58786      




                       ating
                     br
                  ele rm
                 C fo
                  Re




                                               ss
                                      u  s ine
                                     B
                                 ing
THE WORLD BANK


                               Do
Celebrating
Reform




THE WORLD BANK
Table of Contents



                       Preface                                         v

Introduction           Celebrating reform                             1
                       SimeonDjankovandCaraleeMcLiesh

Startingabusiness
EL SALVADOR            Starting a business (quickly) in El Salvador   9
                       JamesNewton,SylviaSolf,andAdrianaVicentini

SERBIA                 How to double business entry in two years      15
                       TomJersildandZoranSkopljak

Employingworkers
MACEDONIA              Employing Macedonia's youth                    20
                       AdamLarson,KirilMinoski,andJanetMorris

Protectinginvestors
MEXICO                 Protecting investors from self-dealing         26
                       MelissaJohnsandJeanMichelLobet

Payingtaxes
EGYPT                  Adding a million taxpayers                     34
                       RitaRamalho

Tradingacrossborders
PAKISTAN               Speeding up trade                              39
                       AllenDennis

Enforcingcontracts
NIGERIA                Repairing a car with the engine running        44
                       SabineHertveldt

Bankruptcy
SERBIA                 Faster, more orderly exit                      50
                       JustinYap

   
                       Acknowledgements                               56
Preface


          Reforming business regulation takes leadership--more than many other reforms.
          Committedleadersprovidevision,energyanddirectiontoimprovingbusinesscli-
          mates,ofteninthefaceofdauntingchallenges.

          TheU.S.AgencyforInternationalDevelopmentandtheWorldBankGrouparefor-
          tunatetoworkwithmanyleadersaroundtheworld,someofwhomarerecognized
          intheaccompanyingcasestudiesofreform.Ithasbeenaprivilegetosupporttheir
          efforts and to see their results. We have also been pleased to partner together in
          manyareasofthiswork,frompioneering"InvestorRoadmaps"or"Administrative
          BarriersAnalysis"togetherinGhanainthemid-1990s,tocollaboratinginintro-
          ducingtheDoing Businessprojecttosub-nationalgovernmentsandontheattached
          casestudies.

          We hope that the case studies will inspire others to reform business regulations.
          Theyfeaturesuccessfulreformsinthe10areascoveredintheDoing Businessreport.
          Thecasestudiesspantheglobe--fromSerbiatoElSalvador,fromEgypttoNige-
          ria--andprovidelessonsonwhatittakestosucceed.Itisthroughsucheffortsthat
          governmentscanencouragebusinessestoinvest,growandcreatethejobsthatlift
          peopleoutofpoverty.




          StephenJ.Hadley                                    MichaelKlein
          Director                                           VicePresident
          OfficeofEconomicGrowth                             Financial and Private Sector
          U.S.Agency                                         Development
          forInternational                                   WorldBankGroup
          Development
                                                                                                   



Celebrating reform
SimeonDjankovandCaraleeMcLiesh


                 Nameyourfavoritedentist.Don'thaveone?That'sbecausenoonelikesgoingtothe
                 dentist.Sometimeshegivesyouunpleasantnews.Sometimesithurts.Onceyouare
                 healthyyoustayasfarawayforaslongaspossible.

                 Reformers are like dentists. Necessary, but generally disliked. Their job is to cure
                 theeconomyandcreatejobs.Veryoftenthisinvolvesunpleasantnewsandithurts,
                 initially.Infact,reformersareevenworseoffthandentists:theyaredislikedeven
                 by their own kind. When a reformist minister says commercial disputes need to
                 beresolvedfasterinthecourts,thejusticeministeraccuseshimofignorance.Or
                 arrogance.Orboth.Whenareformistministersayslaborregulationsaretoorigid
                 andleavemanypeoplestrandedintheinformaleconomy,thelaborministeraccuses
                 himofignorance.Orarrogance.Orboth.

                 Inprosperoustimes,reformersaretoldnottorocktheboat.Incrisistimes,theyget
                 theblamefornotreformingsoonerandavertingthecrisis.Somepursuereforms
                 whilereceivingpersonalthreatsandthreatstotheirfamilies.Itishardtobeare-
                 former.

                 Here are 3 ways to change that. First, document successful reforms and the chal-
                 lenges that had to be overcome along the way. This helps future reformers and
                 highlightsthecontributionsofpastones.Second,createaprizetorecognizereform-
                 ers.MovieshavetheOscars,sciencehastheNobels,andsportshavetheOlympics.
                 Reformerscanhaveawardstoo.Finally,encouragereformerstowriteuptheiroften
                 dramaticstories.Imagineifthesewereturnedintomovies.Itwouldonlytakeafew
                 filmsstarringJudeLaw,AngelinaJolieandGeorgeClooneytomakereformersmore
                 popular.

                 Doing Businessdevelopsthefirstidea,bypresenting8casestudiesofrecentreforms.
                 Thesespantheglobe--fromSerbiatoElSalvador,fromEgypttoNigeria--andshow
                 what it takes to succeed. The case studies show several patterns: Reforms usually
                 happen when new governments take office. They often follow crises. Reformers
                 don't have time for concepts like "getting the right sequencing" and "finding the
                 binding constraint." Reformers are helped by active media and information cam-
                 paigns.Andreformsmaybenefitfromtappingdevelopmentexperts,outsideexper-
                 tise(beitfromISO9000inspectorsorMicrosoft'ssoftwareengineers),andlessons
                 fromothercountries.

                 Wealsotakeonthesecondidea,byorganizingthefirstannualawardsforoutstand-
                 ingreformers(detailsavailableatwww.reformersclub.org).Thethirdideaiswaiting
                 foritschampion.


                                  CELEBRATING REFORM




Reforms are on the rise
                                  Reformstomakeiteasierforbusinessestooperateareontherise.In2005-06,213
                                  reformstookplacein112countries.Thiscomparesto185reformsin99countries
                                  in2004-05.And89reformsin58countriesin2003-04.

                                  Four reasons explain the upswing. First, the collapse of socialism and the entry
                                  of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union in the world economy. Over the
                                  lastdecade,thisregionhasledinreforms(figure1).Thisisnotsurprising:theen-
                                  vironmentfordoingbusinessintheprivatesectorwasdifficultsoalothadtobe
                                  changed.

                                  Second,theincreaseinglobalandregionalcompetition.Regionalagreementssuch
                                  astheUSfreetradeagreementswithCentralAmericancountriesandaccessionof
                                  Eastern European countries into the European Union (EU) have generated huge
                                  reformmomentum.Also,Chinahasbecomeeveryone'scompetitor.In2005-2006,4
                                  ofthetop-10reformershavereformedtoenterregionalagreements:Croatia,Gua-
                                  temala,PeruandRomania.Chinawasatopreformertoo(table1).Countriesare
                                  competingforinvestment,enterprises,andthejobsthatcomewiththem--andasa
                                  resultitisgettingeasiertodobusinessaroundtheworld.

                                  Third, a new focus on reducing corruption. Many reforms to business regulation
                                  aremadenottoincreaseefficiencybuttocutthecorruptpracticesofgovernment
                                  officials.ThisisillustratedmostvividlybyGeorgia,thetopreformerinDoing Busi-
                                  ness 2007 and also the country achieving the biggest drop in corruption in all of
                                  Europe--in200237%ofbusinessessaidthattheyfrequentlypaidbribescompared
                                  withonly8%in2005.

FIGURE 1
The pace of reform is strong in most regions outside of Asia
                                  Percentage of countries that made at least one positive reform
                                                        In 2004                                         In 2005/06
               Eastern Europe
                & Central Asia
                         OECD
                 high income
                Latin America
                  & Caribbean
                 Sub-Saharan
                         Africa
                  Middle East
                & North Africa
                     East Asia
                      & Paci c
                   South Asia

                                  0          20           40         60   80   100     0           20     40         60   80   100

                                  Source: Doing Business database.
                                                                                                                                                                                                          

                                              CELEBRATING REFORM




Table 1
The top 10 reformers in 2005/06
                         Starting Dealingwith Employing Registering                               Getting         Protecting           Paying       Tradingacross Enforcing                Closinga
Economy                 abusiness  licenses    workers   property                                  credit          investors            taxes          borders    contracts                business
Georgia                       3                 3                 3                                  3                                                     3                 3
Romania                                         3                 3                                  3                 3                                   3                                    3
Mexico                        3                                                                                        3                 3
China                         3                                                                      3                 3                                   3
Peru                          3                                                                      3                 3                                                     3                  7
France                                          3                                                    3                                                     3                 3                  3
Croatia                       3                                                    3                                                                                         3
Guatemala                     3                 3                                  3
Ghana                                                                              3                                                     3                 3
Tanzania                      3                                                    3                                   3                                   3
Note: Economies are ranked on the number and impact of reforms. First, Doing Business selects the economies that reformed in 3 or more of the Doing Business topics. Second, it ranks these economies on the
increase in rank in the ease of doing business from the previous year. The larger the improvement, the higher the ranking as a reformer. "X" indicates a negative reform.
Source: Doing Business database.


                                              Finally, what gets measured gets done. New indicators on business regulations in
                                              Doing Business--and from other sources--allow countries to identify bottlenecks
                                              and compare their performance with competitors. This inspires competition--no
                                              onelikeslookingworsethantheirneighbors.In2000,EUcountriesagreedtotrack
                                              thetimeandcosttostartabusiness.Sincethen,everyEUcountryhasmadestartup
                                              easier.Theeffectisevenstrongerwhenmeasurementislinkedtofinancialincentives.
                                              WhentheUnitedStates'MillenniumChallengeAccount(MCA)madeeligibilityfor
                                              fundingdependentontheeaseofbusinessstartup,countriesfromBurkinaFasoto
                                              ElSalvadortoGeorgiatoMalawistartedreforms.IndonesianFinanceMinisterSri
                                              MulyaniIndrawatiarguesthattherealimpactoftheMCAisits"goodhousekeep-
                                              ingsealofapproval,"whichsendsapowerfulsignaltoinvestors."It'snotaboutthe
                                              money.It'sabouttherecognitionthatwe'redoingtherightthing."

How reforms are done
                                              Theexistingmanualsonreformsofferasimplerecipe:takeastrongreformcham-
                                              pion,mixinhighly-qualifiedtechnicalstaff,throwinvaluableadvicefromdevel-
                                              opmentexperts,stiritjusttherightamountoftime,andservewhilestillhot.The
                                              problemisthatreformersoftenmisssomeingredientsandtheresultscanbeabit
                                              lumpy.Herearesomeideasonsubstitutes.

                                              A lot of reforms are sparked by crisis. But there's no need to wait for one to get
                                              change--crises always make things more painful. Reformers can create a sense
                                              of urgency to motivate change--in Nigeria, people were shocked when reformers
                                              publicizedfindingsthat99%oflawyersagreedthejudiciarywascorrupt.InMexico,
                                              reformersusedtheEnronandWorldComscandalsinUnitedStatestopushthrough
                                              higherMexicancorporategovernancestandards.In2004,atthestartoftaxreforms,
                                              Egyptian Finance Minister Youssef Boutros-Ghali pointed to weakening govern-
                                              mentfinancesandsaid,"Doingnothingisdefinitelynotthesolution.Thegreatest
                                              enemytoreformsisinertia."


   CELEBRATING REFORM




   Weknownearly85%ofreformsintopreformingeconomiestookplaceinthefirst
   15monthsofanewgovernment.Butevenwithoutanewpoliticalmandate,reform-
   erscanachievealotbysimplifyingadministrativeprocedures.Whenthegovern-
   ment succeeds in early reforms, citizens start seeing benefits--more jobs, more
   resourcesforhealthandeducation.Theappetiteforfurtherreformsgrows.Unable
   tomakelegislativechangeseasily,ElSalvadorcutthetimetostartabusinessfrom
   155daysto26within2years--allthroughadministrativereformsatthecompany
   registry.Nowtheyareworkingonthelaw.ReformersinPakistanimplementedad-
   ministrativereformsimmediatelywhilepreparingthegroundforthemoredifficult
   andcostlylongertermreforms.OneofKenya'sreformersnotes,"Ifwehadwaited
   forlawstodoanumberofthingswe'redoing,wewouldnotbedoingthem."

   Askdevelopmentagenciesaboutreformstrategiesandthey'lllikelytalkaboutad-
   dressingthebindingconstrainttogrowthorsequencingthereformsefforts.Aska
   successfulreformerandthey'lltalkaboutseizingtheopportunity,anyopportunity.
   "Reformislikerepairingacarwiththeenginerunning,"saysMahmoudMohieldin,
   the Egyptian minister of investment. In Nigeria it did not take years of strategiz-
   ingbeforereformingthecourts.Tenmonthsafteranewattorney-generalofLagos
   Statetookoffice,26newjudgeswereappointed,specializedcommercialdivisions
   set up, and judges' salaries increased. In another example, property registration
   wasreformedinGeorgiain4monthsfollowingtheRoseRevolution.Theprevious
   governmenthadspent6yearsgoingthroughthemotionsofcommissioningstudies,
   consultingwithexperts,andsponsoringseminars.

   Thestrongestoppositionusuallycomesfromwithin.InPakistan,customsworkers
   wereunhappywiththeintroductionofmoreefficientproceduresandtriedtosub-
   vertreform.InMexico,aprominentmediatycoonlobbiedforweakeneddisclosure
   laws.InSerbiaandBulgaria,theministersofjusticedidnotwanttoyieldpowerto
   moreefficientcompanyregistries.InPeru,amodernizedcollateralregistrypromised
   tohelpborrowersbutthreatenedthebusinessofnotaries,whoprotestedloudlyand
   managedtoderailthereforms.InseveralEuropeanUnioncountries,notaryassocia-
   tionslobbyagainsttheadoptionofelectronicsignatures--whichhasvastpotential
   tosimplifybureaucracy.(Thismaychange:recentlytheEuropeanCommissionfiled
   anti-competitivenesschargesagainst9notaryassociations.)

   Onceyoudesignthereformswell,thenextwaytoovercomeoppositioniswitha
   smartoutreachcampaign:tellingpeoplethesearethereformswearedoingandthis
   ishowtheyaregoingtohelpyou.Butmostreformersdon'tspendenoughtimeon
   outreach.Oppositionbuildsandfewentrepreneursgrasphowmucheasierlifecan
   beafterthereforms.ElSalvadorianreformersworkedwiththemediatoexplainand
   buildsupportforthechanges.Otherreformersbargaineddirectlywithstakehold-
   ers.InMacedonia,laborunionswereatfirstdeeplyopposedtothereform.Butonce
   theywerebroughtintothereformprocess,theyworkedwiththegovernmentand
   employerstoimproveregulation.Keytomakingthereformworkwasincludingthe
   unionsinthedraftingofthenewlaw.
                                                                                                  

                      CELEBRATING REFORM




                     Sometimes,areformerevenmanagestoconvincetheopposition.InSerbia,study
                     toursforbankruptcyjudgesbenefitedthereformeffortasmuchastheybenefited
                     thejudges:"Foreverydimewespentonthetours,wesavedtenfoldfromnothaving
                     tospendmoneyonovercomingresistancefromthejudges.Theywerewelcoming
                     thenewlawinsteadoffightingit."OneUSAIDexpertsaidthatthestudytoursbol-
                     steredthecredibilityofreformersintheMinistryofEconomy,asjudgescould"feel
                     andtasteandsmell"forthemselvesandweremoreconvincedthatwhattheywere
                     beingtoldcouldbeputintopractice.

                     Reformerscanalsoblamechangesonoutsiders.ItisnoaccidentthatEasternEu-
                     ropeisthefastestreformingregion.Reformerstherecouldpushthroughcontrover-
                     sialchangesbysayingthattheEUrequiresthem.AndElSalvadorusedaccesstothe
                     MCAasareformrationale.

                     Sometimes a reformer needs luck. A fluke of timing helped Mexico overhaul its
                     securitieslaws,areformthatDoing Business 2007named"ReformoftheYear.""We
                     finisheddraftingthebillinMarch2004,toolatetosubmittoCongressthatterm.
                     ButinsteadofwaitinguntilOctober,wedecidedtoshowittopeopleintheprivate
                     sector,"relatesJos�AntonioGonzalez,directorgeneralforSecuritiesandInsurance
                     intheMinistryofFinanceandakeydrafterofthenewlaw."Theirinputmadeall
                     thedifference."

                     Allreformersgainfromusingindicatorsthatallowthemtomonitorprogressand
                     changecoursewhenneeded.InNigeria,theNationalJudicialCouncilannounced
                     ratingsofjudicialperformanceinMay2006.Judgesnowknowtheyarebeingmoni-
                     toredbyaninstitutionwithdisciplinarypower.Thepoorestperformershavealready
                     leftthebench.InElSalvadorconstantcustomerfeedbackonideasaboutimproved
                     efficiencywascrucialinmeasuringsuccessofthereformsandidentifyingwhatwas
                     stillmissing.Withclientsastheevaluatorsofperformance,reformsquicklybecame
                     moreappreciated--andcustomer-orientationbecamemorethanabuzzword.

Who benefits from reform
                     InBolivia400,000workershaveformaljobsintheprivatesector--outofapopula-
                     tionof8.8million.InIndia8millionworkershavesuchjobs--inacountryof1.1
                     billionpeople.InMalawi,50,000outofapopulationof12million.InMozambique,
                     350,000inacountryof20million.

                     Reformcanchange this, bymaking iteasier for formalbusinesses tocreatemore
                     jobs.Womenandyoungworkersbenefitthemost.Bothgroupsaccountforalarge
                     shareoftheunemployed(figure2).Reformalsoexpandsthereachofregulationby
                     bringing businesses and workers into the formal sector. There, workers can have
                     health insurance and pension benefits. Businesses pay some taxes. Products are
                     subjecttoqualitystandards.Andbusinessescanmoreeasilyobtainbankcreditor
                     usecourtstoresolvedisputes.


   CELEBRATING REFORM




                                                     FIGURE 2
   Between2002and2006Slovakia'sre- High unemployment among youth,
   forms have helped cut the number especially females
   of unemployed people by 67,000. In
                                           Middle East
   Colombiareformsofemploymentand & North Africa
   businessstartupregulationshavecre- Latin America
                                          & Caribbean
   ated300,000jobsintheformalecon- Eastern Europe
   omy. Another success story comes & Central Asia
   from Peru, where in the past decade Sub-SaharanAfrica
   the government has issued property            OECD
                                          high income
   titlesto1.3millionurbanhouseholds.
                                            South Asia
   Secure property rights have enabled                                       FEMALE YOUTH
   parentstofindjobsratherthanstaying         East Asia                      ALL YOUTH
                                               & Paci c
   home to protect their property. Simi-
                                                          0 5     10     15       20     25
   larly, children can now attend school.                     Unemployment rate (%)
   Asaresult,theincidenceofchildlabor Source: ILO (2005).
   hasfallenbynearly30%.

   AhypotheticalimprovementonallaspectsoftheDoing Businessindicatorstoreach
   thelevelofthetopquartileofcountriesisassociatedwithanestimated1.4to2.2
   percentage points in annual economic growth. This is after controlling for other
   factors,suchasincome,governmentexpenditure,investment,education,inflation,
   conflict,andgeographicregions.Incontrast,improvingtothelevelofthetopquar-
   tileofcountriesonmacroeconomicandeducationindicatorsisassociatedwith0.4
   to1.0additionalpercentagepointsingrowth.

   Thegainscomefrom2sources.First, FIGURE 3
   businessesspendlesstimeandmoney More reforms, higher equity returns
   ondealingwithregulationsandchas- Equity market returns (percent, 2003�2006)
   ing after scarce sources of finance. 80                                          �
                                                                            Positive
   Instead, they spend their energies on                                    reforms �
   producingandmarketingtheirgoods. 60 Negative                                     �
                                                                           � � �
                                                                           � �                   �
   The association between reforms and 40        reforms               �         � �                      �
   moreprofitablebusinessesisbestseen                      �        � � � � � � � �
                                                                    � �          �
                                                                                 � � �           �
   in the increase in equity market re- 20                      � � �            �
                                                                                 �
                                                                                 �           �
                                             �                      �
                                                                    �
   turns (figure 3). Second, the govern-
                                          0
   ment spends fewer resources regulat-      4        2         0      2        4       6        8       10
   ing and more providing basic social Source: MSCI, available at www.mscibarra.com, Doing Business database.
   services.
                                                                                                   

                     CELEBRATING REFORM




What can development agencies do
                     If we were at the Oscars, development institutions would take a best-supporting
                     actorawardforseveralofthereformsdescribedhere.Thelargeimprovementsin
                     thebusinessenvironmentinSerbia,Macedonia,ElSalvador,Guatemalawerehelped
                     bytheadviceandattentionofeithertheWorldBank,theUSAID,theMCA,ora
                     bilateralagencylikeSweden'sSIDA.

                     Forexample,in2004donorsincludedareformofbusinessregistrationinthelistof
                     10prioritiesforthenewSerbiangovernment.TheSwedishInternationalDevelop-
                     mentAgencywasthebiggestsupporterofthereform.TheWorldBankandUSAID
                     commissioned several consulting studies, and Microsoft Corporation provided
                     softwareinstallationexpertise.Thetotalcostofreformwasabout2million($2.3
                     million).Theregistryisnowfullyself-financing.

                     As another example, in November 2005 the Ministry of Finance of Mexico made
                     anall-outefforttoshepherdanewsecuritieslawthroughCongress.Butopponents
                     offered amendments that would affect 4 key provisions of the bill--amendments
                     thatwouldevisceratethelaw'ssmallinvestorprotections.Tohelpmakethecasefor
                     reform,FinanceMinisterDiazaskedtheWorldBank'sDoing Businessteamtouseits
                     "protectinginvestors"indicatorsandbenchmarkthedraftproposedbythegovern-
                     mentagainsttheexistinglawandagainstthewatered-downalternativeproposedby
                     aprominenttycoon.

                     Theresultswerestriking.Undertheexistinglaw,Mexicoranked125of145countries
                     measuredbytheDoing Businessinvestorprotectionindex,withsomeoftheweakest
                     protectionsintheworldforminorityshareholders.AmongLatinAmericancoun-
                     triesmeasured,onlyHondurasandVenezuelahadweakerinvestorprotection.

                     If Mexico passed the law as presented by the Ministry of Finance, Mexico would
                     shoot up the ranking index 92 places--to 33. Under the alternative law, Mexico's
                     rankwouldhavefallento132."ThesimulationsstirredenormousinterestinCon-
                     gress and in the media by showing the dramatic differences in Mexico's business
                     environmentifthelawwerenotadopted,"saysoneMinistryofFinanceofficial."If
                     approvedasproposedbythegovernment,thenewlawwouldenhanceinvestorpro-
                     tectionandfosterinvestmentinpubliclytradedandevenprivatelyheldcompanies.
                     Butifthechangesproposedbytheoutsidegroupwereaccepted,theoppositewould
                     happen."

                     Money sometimes helps: to finance new computers and refurbish courts or more
                     generallyprovidethegovernmentwithspaceto"buyout"opponentsofreforms.But
                     mostreformstobusinessregulationaren'texpensive.TheSerbianbusinessstart-up
                     reformscost2million.TransformingMacedonia'slaborlawscostonlythetimeof
                     legaldrafters.ElSalvadorianreformersspentonly$90,000.Instead,donorshelpby
                     bringing in relevantexperience fromothercountriesandbykeepingthe political
                     determinationofthegovernmentunwavering.


   CELEBRATING REFORM




   Perhapsthebiggestcontributiondevelopmentagenciescanmakeistobenchmark
   reformprogress.Publishingcomparativedataontheeaseofdoingbusinessinspires
   governmentstoreform.SinceitsstartinOctober2003,the Doing Businessproject
   hasinspiredorinformed86reformsaroundtheworld.Mozambiqueisreforming
   severalaspectsofitsbusinessenvironment,withthegoalofreachingthetoprank
   ontheeaseofdoingbusinessinsouthernAfrica.BurkinaFaso,MaliandNigerare
   competingforthetoprankinWestAfrica.Georgiahastargetedthetop25listand
   uses Doing Business indicators as benchmarks of its progress. Mauritius and Saudi
   Arabiahavetargetedthetop10.

   Comparisonsamongstatesorcitieswithinacountryareevenstrongerdriversof
   reform. Recent studies across 13 cities in Brazil and 12 in Mexico have created
   fierce competition to build the best business environment. The reason is simple:
   with identical federal regulations, mayors have difficulty explaining why it takes
   longerorcostsmoretostartabusinessorregisterpropertyintheircity.Thereare
   noexcuses.

   Tobeusefulforreformers,indicatorsneedtobesimple,easytoreplicateandlinked
   to specific policy changes. Only then will they motivate reform and be useful in
   evaluating its success. Few such measures exist. But this is changing. In several
   countries, such as Mali and Mozambique, private businesses now participate in
   identifyingthemostneededreforms.Usedtobottomlines,theybringarenewed
   focusonmeasurement.Thecultureofbureaucratstellingbureaucratswhat'sgood
   forbusinessisdisappearing.Goingwithitistheaversiontomeasuringtheresults
   ofregulatoryreforms.
                                                                                                        



Starting a business (quickly) in El Salvador
JamesNewton,SylviaSolf,andAdrianaVicentini


                     On24January2006PresidentAntonioSacaannouncedthelaunchofthenewone-
                     stopshopattheCommercialRegistry,combining8startupproceduresinto1.Start-
                     ingabusiness,whichtook115daysbeforereform,nowtookonly26.Thenextday
                     thevicepresidentcuttheribbonatthebusinessregistrysite.Thingsweregoingwell,
                     thankstoa4-yeareffort."Everythingcanbedonein1placenow,"saysFelixSafie,
                     directoroftheNationalCentralRegistry.

                     Startingabusiness,oftenthefirstcontactbetweentheentrepreneurandthegovern-
                     ment,wasintimidatingbeforethereforms.Ittookalotoftimeandmoney--115
                     daysandmorethan$2,700infees,plus$2,850thathadtobepaidupfrontasmini-
                     mumcapital.This,foracountrywithaverageincomepercapitaof$2,145.Itwasnot
                     uncommonforaseniormanagertospend10hoursadaydealingwithadministra-
                     tiveformalities.Notsurprisingly,38%ofentrepreneurssimplystartedtheirbusiness
                     informally,neverregisteringorpayingtaxes.

                     Thismeantlessrevenueforthegovernment,lessprotectionforconsumers,andno
                     socialsecuritybenefitsforemployees.Italsomeantthatcompaniesusuallystayed
                     small.Investinginnewmachineryorabiggerofficebuildingwasdifficultwithout
                     accesstobankloans.Andthentherewastheconstantworryofbeingdiscoveredby
                     theauthorities.

                     Pressure started rising after several studies highlighted the issue. In addition, the
                     complexstartupprocedurespreventedElSalvadorfromqualifyingforfundingfrom
                     the U.S. Millennium Challenge Account. Funds went only to countries that dem-
                     onstrated above-average performance on several policy and economic indicators,
                     includingthetimeandcosttostartabusiness.Somethinghadtobedone.

                     Safiedecidedtoact.SincehehadbeencalledbythepresidenttoheadtheCentral
                     Registryin1999,hehadalreadyreformedthepropertyregistry.Nowhefocusedon
                     thecompanyregistry.Aformerbusinessowner,heknewthatthewaytochangewas
                     toshiftthefocusfromwhatbureaucratswantedtowhatcustomersneeded.In2001
                     ahumanresourceconsultancy,HGConsultores,studiedtheregistry'sorganization
                     andrecommendedthatitbecomeISO-certified.Thismeantcomplyingwithaseries
                     ofstandardsforqualityassuranceinclientservice.Safielikedtheidea.Itwouldgive
                     thereformaspecifictarget.

Laying the groundwork for change
                     TheISOprocessofferedasimpletargetforthereform,basedonthemotto"what
                     getsmeasuredgetsdone."First,"saywhatyoudo,"thatis,documentproceduresfor
                     workaffectingproductorservicequality.Second,"dowhatyousay,"meaningretain
                     recordsoftheactivitiestomeasureandrecordcompliance.Third,"improvewhat
                     you do" by comparing set goals and actual results, and correct the problems that
                     causethedifferences.InFebruary2003workinggroupswereformedtoanalyze3
                     linesofwork:companydocumentation(suchascommercialregistration),thebusi-
                     nesslicense,andtheregistrationoftheinitialbalance."Thisreviewprocessiswhat
0

Starting a Business   CASE STUDY: EL SALVADOR




                      tookthemosttime,almostawholeyear,"remembersManueldelValle,whomSafie
                      nominatedasthenewdirectoroftheCommercialRegistryinJune2003,"butthe
                      bulkoftheworkwasdone."

                      And since most of it was done in-house, costs were low. Outside experts on ISO
                      standardsprovidedsomeinitialtrainingandguidance,butsoontheregistry'sem-
                      ployeestookover.TheyalsowrotethenewISOmanual(Documentaci�ndeSistema
                      deGesti�ndelaCalidadorQualityManagementSystemDocumentation).Itout-
                      linedforallemployeesanarrativeandschematicmaptoguidethemthroughtheir
                      and(everyoneelse's)processeswithintheregistry.Theguidelinesalsospecifiedhow
                      tocorrectmistakesandmakesurethattheyarenotrepeated.Eachemployeehasa
                      copyofthemanualandisabletorefertoit.Monthlymeetingsperiodicallyreassess
                      therules.Anychangesarepublishedontheregistry'swebsite.

                      Oncethebaselineproceduresweredocumented,thereformsstartedinNovember
                      2003."Everyonehadbeeninvolvedfromthebeginningandwasreadytogo,"says
                      delValle.First,thestaffwasorganizedintosmallteams.Eachemployeewaspartof
                      ateamaccordingtohisorherworkstreamandtask(gruponatural)andareform
                      group(grupodeproyectosdemejora).Theteamsmeteveryweektodiscusstheir
                      previousworkweek,whatwentwrong,andhowtoimproveit.Duringtheweekstaff
                      measuredresponsetimesandthoughtofwaystocutorrearrangeinefficientprocesses.
                      Allmeetingsweredocumentedwithactionitemsforfollow-upthenextweek.

The customer as evaluator
                      To check on implementation and measure results, a new quality control unit was
                      created.Itsolicitedcommentsfromtheregistry'scustomersonthequalityofservice
                      through written and phone surveys and a prominently displayed suggestion box.
                      So-calledmysteryshoppers,differentpeoplecontractedbythequalitycontrolunit,
                      tested the friendliness of client service and processing times. The results of these
                      surveyswereusedtoseewherefurtherimprovementswereneeded.

                      Theeffortspaidoff.Afterayearofhardworkthemajorbottleneck,processingbusi-
                      nesslicenses,wasfixed.Thetimetostartabusinessfellfrom115daysto40byJanu-
                      ary 2005. The original goal of 85% customer satisfaction was exceeded. In March
                      2005theregistrybecameISOcertified,thefirstinLatinAmerica.

                      Thingsalsostartedmovingatthetopofthegovernment.Inthepresidentialcam-
                      paign of 2003-04, soon-to-become-president Antonio Saca promised to launch a
                      programcalledProgramaPresidencial--ElSalvadorEficiente.Theprogramwould
                      improvethelocalbusinessenvironmentbycuttingredtape.

                      Inthe1990sthegovernment'seconomicpolicieshadfocusedonensuringmacro-
                      economicstability.Successfully:thecountryrecoveredstronglyaftertheendofthe
                      civilwar.Buteconomicgrowthslowedtoanannualaverageof3.9%in1995�99,and
                      1.9%in2000�04.Concernedaboutthistrend,PresidentSacarealizedthatmacro-
                      economicstabilitywasnotenough.Redtapewastyingdownbusinessesandholding
                                                                                                     

Starting a Business   CASE STUDY: EL SALVADOR




                      backinvestors,bothdomesticandforeign.

                      Withanincreasinglyopenmarket,competitionwasonlybecomingstronger.ElSal-
                      vadorhadbeennegotiatingtheDominicanRepublic�CentralAmericaFreeTrade
                      Agreement. In December 2004 it was the first country to ratify the agreement. If
                      nothingwasdonetomakedoingbusinesseasierinthecountry,chanceswerethat
                      localcompaniesmightbeoverrunbyfiercecompetition.

                      AttheinsistenceofPresidentSaca,EduardoZablah-Touche,headoftheTechnical
                      SecretariatofthePresidency,developedaplantoeliminate,simplify,andredesign
                      bureaucraticprocessesthatadverselyaffecttheefficiencyandfunctioningofbusi-
                      nesses.BothmenknewwhatitwasliketobeabusinesspersoninElSalvador.Before
                      beingelectedinMarch2004Sacalobbiedonbehalfofprivatebusinessesaspresi-
                      dentoftheNationalAssociationofthePrivateEnterprise.Zablah-Touchehadbeen
                      directorofvariouscompaniesandstartedafewofhisown."Thehappiestmoments
                      arewhenanewcompanyisborn."

How far can you get without changing the law? A long way
                      When it was time to start implementing the plan, the technical secretary formed
                      severalreformcommitteestofocusonredtapefortrade,visarequirements,con-
                      struction and environmental permits, and closing a company. Every committee
                      includedrelevantpublicofficialsandbusinesses.InOctober2005theCommission
                      for the Study of Reforms to the Commercial Code was established to review the
                      commercialcodeandsimplifybusinessstartup.

                      BackedbysupportfromthePresident,MayradeMor�n,thedirectorofthecommis-
                      sion,wastednotime.Shewantedresultsquickly.Shealsoknewthatlegalreforms
                      took time in El Salvador. "Anything that Congress has to approve takes at least 8
                      months." Her solution: let's see how far we can get without legal changes, just by
                      reducingbureaucracy.

                      Anyproceduresnotexplicitlyrequiredbylawwerefirsttogo.Chanceswerethat
                      theymadelittlesenseanyway.Forexample,certainministriesrequiredthatphoto-
                      copieshadtohavecertainsizemargins,withadditionalnotarizationstoensurethat
                      thecopywasaccurate.OnlyveryfewphotocopybusinessesinSanSalvadorcould
                      providethisservice.

                      Next, a single window would be established to allow entrepreneurs to complete
                      formalitieswithdifferentagenciesin1visit.Visitshadbeenrequiredto5different
                      publicagencies.Thiswasnotthefirsttimetheideaofasinglewindowhadcomeup
                      inElSalvador.Alreadyin2000a1-stopshop(OficinaNacionaldeInversiones)had
                      beencreatedinSanSalvador,withbranchesopenedinSonsonateandSanMiguel
                      in2005.Entrepreneurscouldsubmitalltheirdocuments,butthestaffstillhadto
                      organize the registration at different agencies. This took time. And many people
                      thoughtthattheservicewasonlyforforeigninvestors,thoughitwasalsoopento
                      localinvestors.


Starting a Business    CASE STUDY: EL SALVADOR




                       Theplanwastoputofficialsfromthedifferentagenciesin1building.Mostimpor-
                       tant,theywouldhavetheauthoritytocompleteanyformalitybybeingelectronically
                       connectedtotheirrespectiveagencies.Entrepreneurswouldbeabletocomplete8
                       different formalities in 1 place--the company registration, the registration of the
                       initial balance sheet, obtaining the business license, tax ID for both income and
                       value-addedtax,officialinvoicepapers,socialsecurityregistration,andthenotifica-
                       tionoftheMinistryofLabor.

                       It was quickly decided that the customer-oriented commercial registry, with its
                       modern technology, would host the other agencies. To make implementation
                       quickerandsmoother,thecommissionpostponeditsgoalofintroducingasingle
                       registrationform,sincethatmightrequirechangesinagencycomputersystems.

A busy November 2005
                       The Technical Secretariat coordinated the development of service guidelines with
                       interagency working groups and informed the public about the planned single
                       window.Afteraschedulewasdevelopedforreallocatingthedelegatestotheregis-
                       try,workbeganinNovembertobringalltherelevantagenciesonboardandstart
                       implementingthereform.In1weekacoregroupoftechnicians,legalconsultants
                       from the affected ministries, and members of the reform commission drafted the
                       guidelines.AdaylaterthetechnicalsecretarymetwithtopofficialsoftheMinistry
                       ofLaborandtheSocialSecurityInstitute(InstitutoSalvadore�odelSeguroSocial)
                       topersuadethe2toreform.

                       Itworked."Thiswasourgreatadvantage,"recallsMor�n."Thetechnicalsecretary
                       wasnotdirectlyaffectedbythereform,butwaslinkedtothepresidency.Wecould
                       playtheroleofmediatororpushfordecisionswhentheprocessgotstuck."Thefollow-
                       ingweek,thereformplanswerediscussedwithallinstitutionsinvolved.Eachinstitu-
                       tionchoseitsdelegatedofficials,andtechniciansplannedthecomputerconnections.

                       InthethirdweekofNovemberequipmentandpeoplecouldbemovedtothereg-
                       istry.Tosavetimeandmoney,delegatesatfirstbroughttheirowncomputerequip-
                       ment.Formalitiesweredoneonsite,withtheinformationsentelectronicallytothe
                       supervisingagency."Thankfully,mostoftheotheragencieswerealreadycomputer-
                       ized,whichmadethetransferandconnectionmucheasier,"saysMor�n.Onlythe
                       MinistryofLaborwasnot.Butsinceasimplenotificationsuffices,thedelegatecan
                       stampthepaperatthesinglewindowandhavethepackagedeliveredtotheministry
                       attheendoftheday.

                       On21November2005thefirsttestswereconducted.Afewdayslaterarandomcli-
                       entwasaskedtotestthesystem.Basedonthisexperience,theguidelinesandsystem
                       wereadjusted.Testscontinuedinthefollowingweekstomakesurethateverything
                       wasreadyfortheofficialopeninginJanuary2006.Thistimethecommissionmade
                       surethatthereformwouldnotgounnoticed,planning2majorlaunchevents.
                                                                                                      

Starting a Business   CASE STUDY: EL SALVADOR




                      Thereformspiritreceivedanotherboost.InDecember2005ElSalvadorbecame1
                      of2lower-middle-incomecountriesworldwidetoqualifyforMillenniumChallenge
                      Corporation(MCC)funding.(TheotherwasNamibia.)

                      On 24 January 2006 the president announced the opening of the single window
                      togetherwiththeofficiallaunchofElSalvadorEficienteatthepresidentialpalace.A
                      daylaterthevicepresidentcuttheribbonattheregistryinthepresenceofhigh-level
                      officialsfromtheministries.

                      Andso,3monthsafterthefirstmeetingofthereformcommission,thenewsingle
                      windowwasoperating.Entrepreneursfelttheresultsimmediately.Withallagencies
                      in1place,paperworkwascutbymorethanhalf.Justbyhavingdifferentagencies
                      shareinformation,24separaterequirementswereeliminated."Before,Ihadtogive
                      acopyofthecompanystatutestoeachofseveralagencies.NowIjustneed1copyfor
                      thecompanyregistryandtheypassitontothetaxauthorities,"saysoneentrepre-
                      neur.Thetotaltimetostartabusinessdroppedevenfurther,from40daysto26.

                      InNovember2006theMCCBoardofDirectorsapproveda5-year,nearly$461mil-
                      liongrantforElSalvadortostimulateeconomicgrowthandreducepovertyinthe
                      country'snorthernregion,wheremorethanhalfthepopulationlivesbelowthepov-
                      ertyline.Thegrantisestimatedtoimprovethelivesofabout850,000Salvadorans
                      throughstrategicinvestmentsineducation,publicservices,enterprisedevelopment,
                      andtransportationinfrastructure.Incomesintheregionareexpectedtoincreaseby
                      20percentoverthe5-yeartermoftheprogram,andby30percentwithin10years.

                      "We have improved substantially the environment to do business in El Salvador,"
                      said President Saca proudly. "We reduced the cost and time for the government
                      formalities.Withtherecentlaunchoftheone-stopshopattheCentralRegistryfor
                      companystartup,wereducedthenumberofdaystoregisterabusiness,reducingthe
                      costby67%.TheseeffortshavebeeninternationallyrecognizedbytheWorldBank,
                      whichplacedusasoneofthetop15reformersworldwideinthe2007reportand
                      movedusup4positionsontheglobalranking."

What made it work?
                      Reformcanstartonalllevels,particularlywhensimplifyingthebureaucracy.Andit
                      doesnothavetocostmuch.TheISOcertification--includingaudits,training,and
                      15ISOcertificates--cost$66,600.Togetherwithabout$12,000forexternalconsul-
                      tantsandnewequipment,thisamountstobuying4ToyotaCamriesintheUnited
                      States.Asanaddedbenefit,sincetheemployeesredesignedprocesses,wroteguide-
                      lines,andestablishednewrules,everyonewasinformed,feltresponsibleforresults,
                      andtookcreditforthesuccess.

                      Butonceseveralagenciesareinvolved,high-levelsupportandinstitutionalbackup
                      becomeimportant."Oneofthemainreasonsforoursuccesswasthatthecommis-
                      sion operated under the presidency," remembers Mor�n. "We had support from
                      the highest political level. And since we were not directly affected by the reform,


Starting a Business   CASE STUDY: EL SALVADOR




                      wecouldplaytheroleofmediatorordecision-pusherwhennecessary.Everybody
                      knewfromthebeginningthatthepresidentwasgoingtoopenthesinglewindow.
                      Thispushedthereformerstoworkevenharder.Andthankstotheattentionfrom
                      thepresident,therewaslotsofpublicity."

                      When dealing with several independent agencies, the weekly decision-making
                      meetingswithlegalandtechnicalrepresentativesfromtheagenciesmovedthepro-
                      cessalongandensuredthateveryonewasonboard.Sinceallmeetingsanddecisions
                      werewelldocumentedandfollowedup,therewasnoconfusionaboutwhathadto
                      bedone,whatwasexpected,andwhowasaccountable.Quantitativeindicators,such
                      asreducingtheresponsetimeforallformalitiesatthesinglewindowto5days,set
                      measurablegoals,whichgaveeveryoneacleardirection.

                      Constantcustomerfeedbackwascrucialinmeasuringsuccessandidentifyingwhat
                      wasstillmissing.Withclientsastheevaluatorsofperformance,theyquicklybecame
                      moreappreciated--andcustomer-orientationmorethanabuzzword.

                      Thereformersalsorealizedthatitwasnotnecessarytohavealladministrativede-
                      tailsreadytobeeffective.Withalittlecreativity,suchascuttingdownonthenum-
                      berofcopiesrequired,paperworkwasreducedbymorethanhalf,andthecenter
                      couldopenwithin3months.Tosavetimeandmoneyforbuyingnewequipment,
                      delegatessimplybroughttheirowncomputers.

                      Intheend,alltheeffortpaidoff.WhentheDominicanRepublic-CentralAmerica
                      FreeTradeAgreementcameintoeffectinMarch2006,ittook26daystostartabusi-
                      nessinElSalvador,fasterthaninChile,Belgium,orMexico,andmorethantwiceas
                      fastastheregionalaverageof73days.

                      Work still remains. Cost is still high, with 75.6% of income per capita in official
                      fees and 119.7% of income per capita paid before registering. Outdated legal re-
                      quirements remain, such as publishing an establishment notice 3 times in the of-
                      ficialjournalandanationalnewspaper,at3-dayintervals,insteadofsimplyonthe
                      registry'swebsite.Therulesandregulationswerefeltevenduringthereform."One
                      ofthebiggestchallengesduringthereformwasthelegalreviewtocheckwhether
                      anyregulationsexistedthatwouldbeviolated.Thankfully,wealwayshadthelegal
                      expertsineverymeeting,"saysMor�n.

                      Butwiththemomentumgainedfromthesuccessoftheadministrativereform,the
                      reformers have started tackling these more difficult legal changes. The company
                      codehasbeenreviewed.Amongtheproposedamendmentsarecuttingthemini-
                      mumcapitalrequirement,makingthepublicationofnoticeselectronic,andallow-
                      ing notaries, lawyers, and the commercial registry to legalize books to introduce
                      competitionandlowerthecostfortheservice.
                                                                                                      



How to double business entry in two years
TomJersildandZoranSkopljak


                      AtagovernmentpressconferenceinDecember2005SerbianMinisterforEconomy
                      and Privatization Predrag Bubalo said, "The Law on the Registration of Business
                      Entitieshasproducedfascinatingresults."On18January2006theSerbianBusiness
                      Registry Agency celebrated its first anniversary. At the ceremony Bubalo proudly
                      announced,"Duringthefirstyearofoperationtheregistrysetupalmost11,000new
                      companies,anincreaseof70%fromthepreviousyear."

                      Fordecades,startingabusinessinSerbiawastimeconsumingandburdenedwith
                      unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles--the rules inherited from the communist past
                      were not business-friendly. Some of the biggest problems: the $5,000 minimum
                      capital requirement for starting a limited liability company, the necessary inspec-
                      tionsbeforeacompanycouldstartoperating,andthecommercialcourtschecking
                      every document. Sixteen commercial courts were in charge of registering enter-
                      prises,and131municipalitiesdealtwithregisteringentrepreneurs.Thepracticewas
                      soinconsistentthatevenjudgesinthesamecourtrequireddifferentdocuments.As
                      onelawyersays,"Ihadtofilethesameformtothesamecourtin15differentways
                      depending on what judge handled my registration." There were even cases when
                      thecourtsrefusedtoacceptformsfilledoutelectronicallyandinsteadinsistedon
                      handwrittenmaterials.

                      ReportsfromtheU.S.AgencyforInternationalDevelopment(USAID),Deutsche
                      Gesellschaftf�rTechnischeZusammenarbeit(GTZ),theEuropeanUnion,andthe
                      WorldBankidentifiedbusinessregistrationasaseriousproblem.Andin2001�02
                      consensuswasgrowingthatsomethinghadtobedone.AreportfortheMinistry
                      of Economy and Privatization prepared recommendations for reforming Serbia's
                      enterpriseregistrationsystem.Thisreportbecamethebasisforreform.

                      Afterthedecisiontoreform,thedrivingforcebehindtheeffortwastheInter-min-
                      isterialWorkingGrouponDeregulation,whichlaterbecametheCouncilforRegu-
                      latoryReform.Itdraftedtheprimarylaws,coordinatedtheirimplementation,and
                      established the registry. Appointed in late 2002 by Aleksandar Vlahovic, the then
                      MinisterforEconomyandPrivatization,thegroupwasinchargeofdraftingtheLaw
                      ontheBusinessRegistrationAgencyandtheLawontheRegistrationofBusiness
                      Entities.Notallproceededsmoothly.InMarch2003theSerbianprimeministerwas
                      assassinated,andafterseveralmonthsofuncertaintyearlyelectionswerecalledin
                      December.Butthankstotheworkinggroup'senthusiasmandpersistence,continu-
                      itywasmaintained,andsignificantdelayswereavoided.

Changing the laws--and establishing the registry
                      Thereformhad2elements.Thefirstwasaradicalchangeofthelaws,andthesec-
                      ond was making the new system work in practice by establishing a new registry.
                      Threelawswereenacted--theLawontheBusinessRegistrationAgency,theLawon
                      theRegistrationofBusinessEntities,andtheCompanyLaw.Thefirst2established
                      theregistryandradicallychangedtheprocedureforstartingcompanies.Theyalso
                      movedtheprocessfromcommercialcourtsandmunicipalitiestothenewadmin-


Starting a Business   CASE STUDY: SERBIA




                      istrative agency, unburdened by old habits and inertia. Using the Irish system as
                      amodel,thesystemwascentralizedandaccessibleviatheInternet,leadingtofar
                      greaterlegalcertainty.Asoneattorneysays,"NowIcancheckinafewminutesifa
                      companyexists,whatistheaddress,andwhoisauthorizedtorepresentthem.Be-
                      fore,Ihadtogotothecourtforeachinquiry."

                      Another very important change was the deadline of 5 days to register a company.
                      Ifnodecisionismadein5days,theapplicantisfreetobeginoperations("silence
                      isconsent").Thiswasabigchange.PreviouslyunderSerbianlaw,thedecisionwas
                      negativeiftherelevantadministrativebodydidnotrespondintheprescribedtime.

                      Forthecompanylaw,too,ratherthanamendtheoldlaw,anewonemoresuitable
                      foramarketeconomywascreated.Thenewcompanylawreducedtheminimum
                      capitalrequirementforlimitedliabilitycompanies(90%ofallcompaniesinSerbia)
                      from$5,000to500andeasedrequirementsforestablishingcompaniesbymaking
                      therulesmoreflexible.

Out-maneuvering opponents
                      TheworkinggrouporganizedworkshopswithofficialsfromIrishandItalianbusi-
                      nessregistriestoproducereformprinciplesforthegovernment.And3publicdis-
                      cussionswereorganizedwithstakeholdersafterthelawsweredrafted.Thecritical
                      moment was when the government adopted "The Principles" in April 2003. Vla-
                      hovicandMinisterforInternationalEconomicRelationsGoranPiticwerethemain
                      supporters, while the Ministry of Justice was the main opposition. The principles
                      describedthemainpolicyobjectivesofthereformsandconcretestepsforimple-
                      mentation.AndrejaMarusic,theleaderoftheworkinggroup,pointedoutthat"by
                      adoptingtheprinciples,thegovernmentgavepoliticalbackingtotheexpertwork
                      wedidandsilencedlotsofopposition."

                      Theoriginalplanwastohavethenecessarylegislationinplacebymid-2003,and
                      theregistryoperatingbythebeginningof2004.Buttheassassinationoftheprime
                      ministerinMarch2003andsubsequentelectionsdelayedtheregistry'sstartupuntil
                      January2005.

                      ThebiggestopponentsofthereformswerethecommercialcourtsandtheMinistry
                      ofJustice,whichtriedtostalltheprocessandpersuadepolicymakerstokeepbusi-
                      ness registration in the courts. Business registration was a large source of power
                      andinfluenceforcommercialcourts,andsotheyopposedremovingitfromtheir
                      activities.TheSerbianChamberofCommerceandtheNationalBankofSerbiaalso
                      wanteditundertheircontrol.Thankstothepersistenceoftheworkinggroupand
                      latertheCouncilforRegulatoryReform,thereformwasimplementedasenvisaged
                      atthebeginning.Almostallfacetsofthelawwereincludedinthefinallanguage.
                      ButtheMinistryofFinanceandTaxAdministrationretainedcontrolofissuingtax
                      identificationnumbers.
                                                                                                   

Starting a Business   CASE STUDY: SERBIA




                      Thenewcompanylawfacedmuchlessopposition.Fromthebeginningtherewas
                      aconsensusamongpolicymakers,thebusinesscommunity,andacademicsonthe
                      need for change. Foreign experts, mostly funded by USAID, helped early in the
                      processandatsomecrucialmoments,butlocalexpertsdidmostofthework.Even
                      thoughadoptingthenewcompanylawwasmuchsmootherthanestablishingthe
                      registry,limitedpublicdebateleftsomedeficiencies.Oneisthattheminimalcapital
                      requirementforalimitedliabilitycompanywasnotreducedenough.

Costs of reform--about 2 million
                      Whilethecompanylawwasmostlypreparedbylocalexperts,internationaldonors
                      wereimportantsourcesoffinancing.InApril2003theSerbiangovernmentadopted
                      theprinciplesofreformintheJacobsReporttomeetconditionsforaWorldBank
                      loan.In2004donorsincludedreformofbusinessregistrationinthelistof10priori-
                      tiesforthenewSerbiangovernment.Thebiggestcontributionswere1.4 million
                      fromtheSwedishInternationalDevelopmentAgencyand$150,000fromUSAIDfor
                      computers.TheWorldBankfundedagreatdealofconsultancywork,andMicrosoft
                      Corporationdonatedprovisionalsoftwarefortheregistryandotheressentialand
                      timely support. The total cost of reform was about 2 million ($2.3 million). The
                      registryisnowfullyself-financing.

                      Implementingthisreformwasnoteasy.Anewinstitutionhadtobeestablishedand
                      a new system implemented. Having a core group of professionals in the working
                      groupandtheCouncilforRegulatoryReformenabledcontinuityduring2different
                      governmentsandfreedthereformfrompoliticalinfluence.Butthispoliticalneu-
                      tralitywassometimesdamagingbecausepoliticianswerenotfullycommitted.

                      Afterthelawswereadopted,itwasrealizedinthesecondpartof2004thatsoftware
                      andhardwarepurchaseswouldnotbemadeintime.AsAndrejaMarusicfromthe
                      Council for Regulatory Reform describes, "It was clear that we were running out
                      oftime.Wehad2options--topostponethestartoftheregistryforayearandrisk
                      furtherdelays,compromisingthereform,ortostartasplannedandtrytofixthe
                      problemsastheycame."Thedecisionwastocontinuewithstartingup.Theregis-
                      trybeganoperationsatthebeginningofJanuary2005andayearlaterbecamethe
                      country'sonlyaddressforbusinessregistration.

                      Aftertheregistrystartedthebiggestchallengewasre-registeringexistingcompanies,
                      almost70,000ofthem.Itwasabigworkload,andthecommercialcourtsobstructed
                      theprocess.Inaddition,thefacilitiesweretoosmall,butthiswillbefixedin2007
                      whentheregistrymovestonewfacilities.


Starting a Business     CASE STUDY: SERBIA




Immediate effects--from 51 days to 18
                        Theeffectsofthereformwerefeltalmostimmediately.Thetimenecessaryforstart-
                        ingabusinesswasreducedfrom51daysin2004to18in2005.Thenewsystemwas
                        aradicalchange,withafocusoncustomerserviceanduserfriendliness.Andthe
                        formsforregistrationarebeingcontinuallyimprovedtoreducethetimetocomplete
                        them. After the very decentralized and inconsistent practices of the commercial
                        courts, the new system is centralized, with internet access to all registration data.
                        Tounifypracticesonly1person--theregistrar--hasfinalauthorityandthepower
                        tointerprettherelevantlaws.Thisincreaseslegalcertaintyanduniformityacross
                        theboard.

                        Duringitsfirstyear,theSerbianBusinessRegistryAgencyregisteredalmost11,000
                        newcompanies,70%morethanin2004,shrinkingtheinformalsector.In2years,
                        thenumberofregisteredbusinessesmorethandoubled.Praisehasbeenhigh.One
                        attorney says, "Since the registry started operating I did not have to appeal at all
                        againsttheirdecisions,whilebeforeIhadtodoitveryoften."

If it had to be done again
                        IfSerbiahadtodoitagain,itwouldadopttheprinciplesofreformearliertoprevent
                        delays and limit opposition, especially from the courts and the Justice Ministry.
                        If reform implementation is assigned to a professional nonpolitical body, chances
                        increase significantly that the reform will survive governmental or other political
                        changes.Assigningreformcoordinationtoaninter-ministerialworkinggroup,such
                        astheCouncilforRegulatoryReform,accommodatedvariousministriesthatmight
                        otherwisehavebeeninconflict.

                        Reforms should not be delayed because not everything is completely determined
                        aheadoftime.Ifthereformprocesstakestoolong,theriskistolosemomentum.
                        Manyissuesarebetteraddressedduringtheprocess.

                        Creatinganentirelynewinstitutionwithnewspecially-trained,morecapable,and
                        well paid staff, while somewhat extreme, helped avoid the legacy of prior institu-
                        tions.OtheroptionsforanewSerbianbusinessregistrationsystemwerebasedon
                        modifyingexistinginstitutionsandprocedures,butitisdoubtfulthattheywould
                        havebroughtabouttheneededchange.

                        Coordinationwithotherreformsandlegislativechangescouldhavebeenbetter.For
                        example,itisnotpossibletofileregistrationdocumentselectronicallybecausethe
                        LawonElectronicSignaturesisnotinplace.Andotherlawsadoptedwereincom-
                        patiblewiththerulesforregisteringabusiness.

                        Oncethesystemisworking,processimprovementsshouldcontinuetoeliminatede-
                        lays.Andeventhoughitwasoriginallyplannedtohavetaxidentificationnumbers
                        attheregistry,thisstillisnotpossible.TheTaxAdministration,moresophisticated
                        and sensitive to various forms of tax fraud, is now scrutinizing tax identification
                                                                                                   

Starting a Business   CASE STUDY: SERBIA




                      numberapplicationsmoreclosely.Butitslegitimateconcernsfortaxfraudshould
                      notdelaybusinessregistration,socontinuingeffortsarenecessarytoimprovecoop-
                      erationbetweenthecompanyregistryandotherrelevantagencies.

                      ThebusinessregistrationsysteminSerbiacouldbeimplementedinothercountries.
                      TheSerbiansystemisnotuniqueandwasdesignedwithEuropeanbestpracticesin
                      mind,theIrishmodelinparticular.TheSerbianexamplecouldbeespeciallyvalu-
                      able for neighboring countries, which share similar problems and challenges. For
                      example,inJanuary2007theSerbianBusinessRegistryAgencyorganizedawork-
                      shopforBulgariancounterpartswhoareworkingontheirnewregistrationsystem.
0



Employing Macedonia's youth
AdamLarson,KirilMinoski,andJanetMorris


                       ThenumberofjobcontractsconcludedinMacedoniaincreased5.9%forJanuary�
                       October2006oversameperiodayearbefore,witha30.6%increaseforfixed-term
                       contracts--impressivegainsforacountrywhereunemploymenthoveredabove30%
                       throughoutthe1990s,partlyduetorigidemploymentlaws."[Macedonia]wanted
                       flexibilityandwegotit,"saysonelocaleconomist.

                       MacedoniapassedtheLaborRelationsActon22July2005,thefirstsignificantlabor
                       law reform since 1993. Major reforms in labor and employment law are uncom-
                       mon--largelybecauseoftheextraordinarypoliticalwillrequired.Changinglabor
                       lawscaninspirestrongreactionsfromemployersandemployeesalike,ofteninvery
                       different ways. Emotions can run high, with labor laws affecting something that
                       bothcareabout:theirlivelihoods.

                       With Macedoniasuffering fromchronicallyhighunemployment,thegovernment
                       decidedin2003thatitwastimeforamajorreform.Partofthecurewasanewlabor
                       law that could better respond to the economy's needs. Passing the new law was a
                       success for 2 key reasons. First, representatives of both employees and employers
                       took part in the reform process. Each side had a voice, and neither felt excluded.
                       Second,thenewlawenjoyedstrongpoliticalsupportfromboththegoverningand
                       oppositionpartiesinparliament.

                       Whileemployersandemployeesdisagreedonsomeissues,theyagreedthatastrong
                       economywithlowunemploymentwasagoodthing.Withthatasastartingpoint,
                       thegovernmentwenttowork.

Chronically high unemployment
                       Macedonia hadgrappledwithrisingunemploymentfordecades.Theproblemwas
                       oneofitsmostpressingsocialissues.RegisteredunemploymentinMacedoniahad
                       beenrisingsincetheearly1960s,topping20%inthe1970s.By1991,whenMace-
                       doniagainedindependencefromYugoslavia,theeconomyhadbeencontractingfor
                       morethan6years,andunemploymentwasabout24%.

                       High unemployment hit Macedonia's youth and women especially hard. A 2003
                       studyfoundthatnearly30%oftheunemployedwerebetweentheagesof15and24.
                       In2001only32%ofMacedonianwomenofworkingagewereemployed,muchless
                       than51%intheEuropeanUnionand54%inOECDcountries.Nearlytwo-thirds
                       ofthepeoplelookingforworkhadbeenwithoutajobforatleast4years,andthere
                       wasevidencethatmostofthemwereyoung.

Fighting the problem at its source--the law
                       NumerousfactorscontributingtoMacedonia'ssoaringunemploymentwerebeyond
                       the country's control, but reforming Macedonia's labor law was a significant first
                       step in combating unemployment. The Labor Relations Act of 4 December 2003
                       wasprincipallybasedona1993law(theLaborRelationsActof27December1993),
                       writtenmainlywithsociallyownedandstate-ownedenterprisesinmind.Thegov-
                                                                                                   

Employing Workers    CASE STUDY: MACEDONIA




                     ernmentsetouttopassanewlawtoaddressthechangesinMacedonia'seconomy.

                     Reformsfocusedon4keyissues.First,legislatorsintroducedmoreflexibilityinthe
                     typesoflaborcontractspermittedandclarifiedthelanguageofprovisionsgoverning
                     part-timeandfixed-termcontracts.Second,theybuiltmoreflexibilityintoovertime
                     provisions.Third,theysimplifiedredundancyprocedurestomakecomplianceeasier
                     andlesscostly.Fourth,theymadechangestothecollectivebargainingframework,
                     includingthosetocomplywithInternationalLaborOrganizationstandards.

Making the reform happen
                     WhentheSocialDemocraticUnionofMacedoniawonparliamentaryelectionsin
                     2002,withBrankoCrvenkovskiasitshead,oneofitskeyelectionpromiseswasto
                     createjobs.AlthoughBrankoCrvenkovskilefthispositionasprimeministertobe-
                     comepresidentin2004,thepartyremainedinpowerthroughoutthereformprocess
                     thatledtoanewlaborlawin2005.

                     Aside from combating unemployment, the Macedonian government needed to
                     reform its labor laws before it could join the European Union, after applying for
                     membership in March 2004. The European Council Decision of 22 July 2003 set
                     guidelinesthatcalledformemberstatestopromoteemploymentpoliciesthatwould
                     encouragejobcreation.Itsetthegoalofreachinganemploymentrateof70%by
                     2010.Italsocalledformembercountriestopromotejobcreationbyimprovingthe
                     adaptabilityofworkersandfirmstoeconomicchangesandrestructuring--andby
                     transformingundeclaredworkintoregularemploymentthroughmeasurestoelimi-
                     nateundeclaredwork.

                     WorldBankeconomistArvoKuddoadvisedthegovernmentthroughoutthereform
                     process.HestartedinSeptember2004bypreparinglistsofkeyreformobjectives
                     andproposingpossiblesolutionstothegovernment.ThenbetweenNovember2004
                     andJanuary2005,laborandemployerrepresentativeshadtheopportunitytoexpress
                     theirviewsonthekeyobjectivesthroughwrittenproposalstothegovernment.

                     InJanuary2005meetingstookplacebetweenofficialsfromtheMinistryofLabor
                     and Social Policy and several "social partners" (employers associations, trade
                     unions,andotherinterestgroups).Thiswasacrucialstep.Participantssharedtheir
                     perspectives, voiced their concerns, and worked to hammer out a compromise. In
                     March2005theMinistryofLaborheldadditionalconsultationssothatthevarious
                     groupscouldprovidefurtherinputonthedraftlaw.ThroughoutAprilandMaythe
                     partieshotlydebatedarangeofreformproposals.

                     Laborunionswereatfirstdeeplyopposedtothereform.Butoncetheywerebrought
                     intothereformprocessandgivenavoice,theyworkedwiththegovernmentand
                     employer representatives to negotiate compromises. Key to making the process
                     workwasincludingtheunionsinthedrafting,ratherthancraftingalawwithout
                     theirinput.ThroughsustainedinteractionwiththeMinistryofLabor,theunions


Employing Workers                   CASE STUDY: MACEDONIA




FIGURE 4
Timeline of labor law reform in Macedonia                                                                                    Source: Doing Business database.

                                         JUL                  OCT                   JAN                   APR                      JUL

EARLY 2004
Labor ministry begins drafting
new labor law.
FALL 2004                                                           Macedonian government debates reform proposals.
First reform proposals.
WINTER 04/05
Labor and employer representatives submit written proposals
on desired provisions.
JANUARY 2005
Second reform proposals.                                                                      Focus group meetings with social partners.


FEBRUARY 2005
International labor experts provide technical comments on draft.
SPRING 2005
Labor Ministry holds extensive consulations                                                                        Unions' support is won.
with social partners.
MAY 5, 2005
Government submits the draft labor law to parliament for rst reading.

JULY 4, 2005
Government submits the draft labor law to parliament for second and nal reading.

JULY 22, 2005
New law is adopted by parliament.

AUGUST 5, 2005
New law enters into force.



                                    cametorealizethatreformhelpseveryone.Thenewlawwaspassedwithoutdisrup-
                                    tivestrikesthatmighthaveimpededthereformeffort.

                                    Thereformenjoyedsupportacrossthepoliticalspectrum.Infact,thegreatestsur-
                                    prise was probably the ease and speed of parliament's passing the new law. With
                                    unemploymentsopersistent,theoppositionpartymadeapointofnotchallenging
                                    thelegislation,andmostparliamentariansgenuinelyfavoredreform.Anditstotal
                                    costwasminimal,becausetherewerenodirectcosts,simplythetimededicatedby
                                    staffoftheMinistryofLabor.

                                    Thegovernmentfirstsubmittedadraftofthelawtoparliamenton5May2005,and
                                    by22Julythefinalversionwaspassed.On28JulytheLaborRelationsActof22July
                                    2005waspublishedintheOfficialGazetteoftheRepublicofMacedonia,entering
                                    intoforce8dayslateron5August2005.

Introduce flexibility, streamline, and clarify
                                    The2005laborlawcreatednewandmoreflexibleoptionsforlaborcontracts,clari-
                                    fiedandliberalizedovertimeprovisions,limitedtheeventsthatqualifiedforpaid
                                    leave,andstreamlinedredundancyprocedures.Italsoredefinedtheframeworkfor
                                    collectivebargaining,clarifyingseveralrulesandlimitingthedurationofcollective
                                    bargainingagreementsto2years.
                                                                                                    

Employing Workers     CASE STUDY: MACEDONIA




                      Underthepreviouslaborlaw,somearticleswereambiguous,evenaboutwhattypes
                      of contracts they purported to regulate. The new law clarified the rules applying
                      to fixed-term and part-time contracts, and promoted more diverse employment
                      relationships by loosening restrictions on the use of fixed-term, temporary, and
                      part-timeemploymentcontracts.Article46,forexample,cappedthetotallengthof
                      fixed-termcontracts(includingrenewals)at4years,upfrom3.

                      Previously, overtime was allowed only under exceptional circumstances, such as
                      fires and epidemics. Under the new law overtime was no longer limited to those
                      cases.Weeklyovertimewaslimitedto10hours,annualovertimeto190hours,with
                      lowerlimitsforminors.

                      Theoldlaborlawrequiredemployerstonotifyastateemploymentagencyeachtime
                      acontractwasterminatedduetoredundancy.Severancecostswerehighevenbyre-
                      gionalstandards,withthemaximumpaymentsetat8monthlysalaries.Thenewlaw
                      relaxedpreconditionsforvalidredundancydismissalsandlimitedmaximumsever-
                      ancepayto6monthlysalaries.

                      The collective bargaining framework under the old labor law violated ILO stan-
                      dards.Convention144onTripartiteConsultationrequiredthatrepresentationby
                      socialpartnersbevoluntaryandthatcollectiveagreementsbindonlypartiestothe
                      agreement.ButMacedonia'scollectiveagreementsboundtheentirepublicandpri-
                      vatesectors,evenworkerswhoserepresentativeswerenotpartiestotheagreements.A
                      singlechamberofcommercerepresentedallemployers,whetheranemployerwanted
                      toberepresentedbyitornot.Tocomplicatematters,thelawdidnotprovideclear
                      rulesdefiningwhichpartieswerequalifiedtorepresentemployersandemployeesin
                      negotiatingcollectiveagreements,anditplacednolimitsonthedurationofacollec-
                      tivebargainingagreement.

                      The new law made membership in trade unions and employers' associations vol-
                      untary.Itlaiddownrulesfordeterminingwhichpartiesmayrepresentemployers
                      and employees in negotiating collective agreements. And the law made collective
                      agreements binding only for signatories and members of signatory organizations.
                      Inaddition,itlimitedcollectiveagreementstoafixed2-yearterm,makingregular
                      renegotiationnecessary.

Improving opinions--an important first step
                      Forthegovernment,thepassageofthe2005laborlawwasagreatsuccess.Andun-
                      derstandablyso:tohavesmoothlyadoptedareformofsuchbreadthwasnosmall
                      feat,especiallywiththedivergenceofviewsamongthepartiesinthediscussions.

                      Employersandemployeesalikearepleasedwiththeflexibilitythenewlawbrought
                      toemploymentcontracts."Iconsiderthelawpositive,"notesSlagjanMihajlovski,
                      owner of Infinite Solutions, a software development company with 20 employees,
                      "becausemanyoftheobstaclestoflexibleformsofemploymenthavebeenelimi-


Employing Workers   CASE STUDY: MACEDONIA




                    nated."MilivojeDzordevic,theowneroffx3x,avisualeffectsandanimationcom-
                    pany with 20 employees, agrees, "My opinion of the labor law is positive, since it
                    allowsmeflexibleformsofemployment[whichare]essentialforthenatureofmy
                    project-orientedbusiness.Thisissomethingthathasadirectimpactonthecompet-
                    itivepositionofmycompany."Twenty-year-oldMarkoCulev,apart-timeemployee
                    atthecompany,adds,"[It]allowedmetohaveapart-timejob,sinceIcouldwork
                    only4hoursadayduetomyvariousotherresponsibilities."Heandotheremployees
                    wish, however, that a public awareness campaign had brought the changes in the
                    laborlawtothegeneralpublic'sattention.

                    Some employers and employer representatives feel that more reform is needed,
                    though they consider the new labor law a move in the right direction. Valentino
                    Konstantinovski, owner of Etapa Project, an architecture and engineering firm
                    with 6 employees, is pleased that the new law "shortens employment and redun-
                    dancy procedures," but considers it "just the first step for establishing the overall
                    frameworkthatwillsupportthegrowthofsmallandmediumenterprises."Darko
                    Velkov,ownerofaprivateemploymentagencyfortemporaryworkers,Vrabotuvanje
                    Leasing,andmanagerofthelargestprivateemploymentagency,Vrabotuvanje.com
                    (meaning "Employment.com") agrees, "[T]he new Labor Relations Act is a small
                    movementinapositivedirection,butitisjustthefirststepintheadjustmentofthe
                    legislationtothelabormarketneeds."MileBoskov,presidentoftheConfederation
                    of the Employers of the Republic of Macedonia, bluntly says that he supports an
                    "ongoingprocessofregulatoryguillotine."

                    Unions and employer organizations disagree over some of what they feel is good
                    about the labor law. Labor unions emphasize that greater worker protections are
                    needed,whileemployerorganizationsliketheEmployers'OrganizationoftheRe-
                    publicofMacedoniacomplainthatthelawisstilltooburdensomefortheemployer.
                    Whilethequalityofthelegislationwashigh,thelawwastheresultofacompromise,
                    andassuch,itprobablyfitnoone'sideal,"Thelawisnotperfect,butunderthecir-
                    cumstancesandthecompromisesthathadtobemade,itwasasuccess."

                    Butonepointwherebothunionsandemployerrepresentativesagreeistheircriti-
                    cismoftheminimumrequiredbythenewlawforrepresentingemployersandem-
                    ployeesincollectivebargainingnegotiations.AccordingtoArticles212and213of
                    thenewlaw,totakepartinthenegotiationsonacollectiveagreement,unionand
                    employerorganizationsmusteachrepresentaminimumof33%ofthetotalnumber
                    ofemployeesandemployers,respectively,coveredbythecollectiveagreement.

                    Theprobleminsomesituationsisthatnorepresentativeorganizationcanmeetthis
                    threshold.Whilethisisnotanobstacletocollectivebargainingatthefirmlevel,it
                    isatthenationalandbranchlevel.BecauseMacedoniadoesnothaveatraditionof
                    firm-levelbargaining,bargainingcanshifttothefirmlevel,orunionscanconsoli-
                    datetojoinforces.Ironically,thehighthresholdwasproposedbythedominantunion
                    asawaytoprotectitsposition.Thestrategybackfired,however,becauseevenitfails
                    tomeetthethreshold.
                                                                                                     

Employing Workers      CASE STUDY: MACEDONIA




Lesson--include social partners in the dialogue
                       Themainlessonforothercountriesisthatsocialpartnersneedtobeincludedinthe
                       draftingprocessatanearlystage.Unions,chambersofcommercerepresentingem-
                       ployers'interests,andgroupsofbusinessexecutivesallparticipatedindiscussions
                       leadinguptothe2005reform.Thisgavethemavoiceandanopportunitytohave
                       theirinterestsaddressed,whichledtobroadacceptanceofthenewlaw.

                       Groupsincludedinthetalksareclearlymoresatisfiedwiththereform'soutcome.
                       AcoSpasevskioftheMacedonianChamberofCommerce,representingtheinterests
                       ofsmall-andmedium-sizeenterprises,calledthereformprocessa"positiveexperi-
                       ence"andmadeapointofemphasizingtheconcreteresultsofconstructivecoopera-
                       tionwiththegovernment.

Impact of the reform--an early indication of positive results to come
                       Giventhatthenewlawmakesiteasiertoformflexiblelaborcontracts,itwouldnot
                       besurprisingtoseeanincreaseinredundanciesintheshortterm,followedbyan
                       increaseinthenumberoffixed-termandpart-timecontracts.Butlayoffshavenot
                       materialized.Macedoniawillneedtoexperiencebothaperiodofeconomicexpan-
                       sionandoneofcontraction(afullbusinesscycle)beforetheeffectsofthereform
                       materialize.

                       Anearlyindicationthatthereformisworkingistheriseinemploymentofyouths
                       ages15�24.Inthesecondquarterof2006(themostcurrentlaborstatisticsavail-
                       able)ascomparedwiththesamequarterinthepreviousyear,employmentrose4
                       percentage points (from 13.4% to 17.4%) and unemployment fell 5.2 percentage
                       points (from 59.8% to 54.6%). Because young people are the group most actively
                       lookingforwork(astheyarejustenteringtheworkforce),theyaremostlikelytobe
                       affectedbythereformintheshortrun.

                       WilltheresultsofMacedonia'slaborreformcontinuetobepositive?Theearlysigns
                       areencouraging.The2005laborlawwasacriticalmovetowardreducingunemploy-
                       ment.Byconsultingwithlaborlawexperts,buildingbroad-basedpoliticalsupport
                       for the new legislation, and creating an effective dialogue with social partners,
                       Macedoniahasmovedpastanobstaclethatimpedesmanycountries.




Protecting investors from self-dealing
MelissaJohnsandJeanMichelLobet


                      AflukeoftiminghelpedMexicooverhaulitssecuritieslaws."Wefinisheddrafting
                      thebillinMarch2004,toolatetosubmittoCongressthatterm.Butinsteadofshelv-
                      ingituntilOctober,wedecidedtoshowittopeopleintheprivatesector,"relatesa
                      keydrafterofthenewlaw."Theirinputmadeallthedifference."

Persistent underperformance
                      In2004Mexico'ssecuritiesmarketwasatinyfractionofwhatwouldbeexpected
                      from the size of its economy. The Republic of Korea's gross national income was
                      similar($600�$700billion)butithad10timesmorelistedfirms.Chinahadase-
                      curitiesmarketwith4timesthecapitalofMexico's.LatinAmericareceived9%of
                      globalprivateequityflows,butMexico,withmorethanathirdoftheregion'sin-
                      come,receivedonlyatenthofthat.Andmorecompaniesweredelistingratherthan
                      issuingnewsharesontheMexicanstockexchange.Investorslookingformarkets
                      withthegreatestliquidity,transparency,andshareholderrightswerenotinvesting
                      inMexico.

                      Why? Antiquated securities laws and tightly controlled companies gave minority
                      investorslittleassurancethattheirrightswouldbeprotected.In2004,Mexicohad
                      only150companieslistedonthestockexchange,with60%ofthemcontrolledby
                      a single shareholder. A diagnostic report by the World Bank identified a number
                      of weaknesses in the legal framework, including a lack of definition for directors'
                      responsibilitiestowardthecompany.Thelawalsohadnorequirementthatsubsid-
                      iariescomplywiththecorporategovernancerequirements,sonotsurprisinglymany
                      listedcompanieswereholdingcompanies,withsubsidiariesoperatingoutsidethe
                      fullcorporategovernanceregime.Itwasdifficultforminorityshareholders--orany
                      outsiders--toverifymanagers'financialconduct.

                      Theresult:insiderdealswerefrequent,channelingwealthoutofthecompanyinto
                      thecontrollingshareholders'pockets."TherewasasayinginMexico:richbusiness-
                      men,poorcompanies,"saysonereformer.

An opportunity to reform
                      TheFoxadministration'ssuccessinotherfinancialsectorreformsbuoyeditshopes
                      toimproveMexico'ssecuritieslaws.Accordingtoonegovernmentofficial,"Earlier
                      financial sector reforms were not very charged politically." Securities regulations
                      wereseenasanotherstepintheadministration'seffortstoreformMexico'sfinancial
                      markets.Congressionalchampionsofreformwerealsovocal:onecongresswoman
                      challengedtheministeroffinancetoattackvestedinterestsinthesecuritiesmarkets,
                      tauntinghimwiththelabel"ministerofstagnation"ifhefailedtopushsecurities
                      reform.

                      ThehighlypublicizedEnronandWorldComfinancialscandalsintheUnitedStates
                      gaveMexicanpolicymakersanotherpoliticalopportunitytopushthroughtheircap-
                      italmarketreforms.Ratherthanrewriteexistinglegislation,theMinistryofFinance
                                                                                                                                                                                           

Protecting Investors                CASE STUDY: MEXICO




                                    decidedtodraftacompletelynewact.Thegoal:greaterMexicancompetitivenessin
                                    theglobalcontestforfunds.

                                    "Mexicohasahugeneedandabigappetiteforcapitalinvestment,"saysonepart-
                                    neratatopMexicanlawfirm.Mutualfunds,pensionfunds,andforeigncapitalin
                                    search of new destinations for investment had so far avoided Mexico. "There are
                                    fundsinMexicotogoaround.Butwithoutprotection,peoplewon'tinvestlocally."

A small drafting team
                                    Theoriginaldraftingteamforthenewlawwassmall:aseniorMinistryofFinance
                                    official,aseniorofficialfromtheComisi�nNacionalBancariaydeValores("CNBV,"
                                    Mexico'ssecuritiesregulator),alawyerfromeachoffice,and2outsidelawyers.They
                                    startedwithaconceptualbasedraftedinOctober2002andworkedthrough2003
                                    writingthenewlaw(figure5).OnlyinFebruary2004didtheycompleteafulldraft
                                    forinternalreview.Amonthandahalflater--ayearandahalfafterbeginning--the
                                    jointteamwasreadytopresenttheproposedlawtoCongress."Wethoughtwewere
                                    done,butitwasonlythebeginning,"saysonememberoftheteam.

                                    The reform team's timing was off. In March 2004 Congress had only a few weeks
                                    until the end of the session. It was too late to submit such a large and important
                                    pieceoflegislation.ButratherthanwaitingtounveilthebillinCongressandwork

FIGURE 5
Timeline of investor protections reform in Mexico                                                                                                           Source: Doing Business database.
                                             2003                                          2004                                                 2005                                     2005
                                      �    � JAN �   �   �   �   �   �   �   �   �   �   � JAN �    �   �   �     �   �   �   �   �   �   �   � JAN �   �   �   �   �   �   �   �   �   � DEC
1. Min. of Finance and securities
   regulator (CNBV) create                Enron scandal in the U.S. provides political opportunity for reform
   reform team
2. Reform team drafts new                                                                          6-person team is shielded from
   securities law                                                                                  internal politics while drafting


3. Internal discussions within Min. of Finance and CNBV to nalize draft law


4. Private sector representatives review proposed law                                                           1st draft distributed during summer congressional break


5. Reform team and private sector lawyers meet weekly to revise law

                                                                                                                                              2nd draft distributed at Christmas
6. Second version of proposed law distributed, debated                                                                                        congressional break


7. Government presents draft law to congress


8. Supporters lobby for passage                                          Finance minister speaks out against amendments
                                                                                    that would dilute the new regulations.
                                                                                                         Amendments fail.
9. Congress debates and passes law


10. 150+ meetings with accountants, regulators and lawyers to discuss reforms


Protecting Investors   CASE STUDY: MEXICO




                       through any opposition there, reformers took a novel approach: they invited the
                       relevant stakeholders to review a "pre-draft" and participate in shaping it before
                       submittingthebilltoCongress.

                       Thisprocesstook2steps.First,reformersmetwitheverygroupthatwouldbeaf-
                       fectedbythenewlegislation(businessassociations,financeprofessionals,theMexi-
                       canbar,thestockexchange,andlistedcompanies)topresentthegoalsofthereform.
                       These goals were to strengthen the Mexican stock market through 1) new listed
                       firmsand2)higherdemandforMexicanfirms'stock.Asthegovernmentofficials
                       explained,thelawsoughttoaccomplishthisthrough3approaches:1)streamlined
                       regulations for listing a new company; 2) increased transparency and minority
                       investorrights;and3)acorporatestructureforlistedcompaniesthatmoreclosely
                       reflectedinternationalbestpractices.

                       Second,afterthepresentationsthereformersinvitedagroupofprominentprivate
                       sectorlawyers,representativeofallthegroups,toformadraftingcommittee.This
                       committeewouldgothroughtheexistingbill--keepingthegoalsforthelegislation
                       inmind--andeliminateanyambiguities,contradictions,andloopholesthatmight
                       befoundinthe"pre-draft"text.

                       Ministry of Finance and CNBV officials met with representatives of top Mexican
                       law firms every Thursday evening between 5pm and 8pm, April to September. "I
                       callthemthe$15,000meetings[theamounttheattorneyswouldtypicallychargefor
                       theirtime].Intheend,wecompletelyrewrotethelaw.Andthefinalproductmetour
                       goals--greatertransparencyofpubliccompanyoperationsandbroaderprotection
                       ofminorityshareholderrights,"saysoneofficial.

The political battle
                       Thepoliticalbattlecamenext.ThenewdraftwassubmittedtoCongressinOctober
                       2004. Although its prospects were uncertain down to the final vote, it ultimately
                       passedinsubstantivelythesameform1yearlater.

                       OneofthebiggestmediaconglomeratesinMexicowasthemostvocalopponentof
                       thebill,protestingtheminorityshareholderprotectionsandthedisclosureprovi-
                       sions.ThegroupalsoarguedthatthenewlawwastoosophisticatedforMexicoand
                       toocloselymatchedtheUnitedStates'Sarbanes-Oxleylegislation.

                       Atonepointitseemedthereformeffortwouldfail.InNovember2005theMinistry
                       ofFinancemadeanall-outefforttoshepherdthedraftsecuritieslawthroughCon-
                       gress.Butopponentsofferedamendmentsthatwouldaffect4keyprovisionsofthe
                       bill--amendmentsthatwouldevisceratethelaw'sinnovativeprotections.Andthe
                       opponentswereadeptatusingtheiraccesstotheMexicanmediatosquelchsupport
                       forthebill.

                       TohelpmakethecaseforthecompletelawwithoutamendmentstotheCongress,
                       FinanceMinisterDiazpulledintheWorldBank'sDoing Business team.Diazasked
                                                                                                                 

Protecting Investors    CASE STUDY: MEXICO




                       theteamtouseits"protectinginvestors"indicatorstobenchmarkthedraftsecuri-
                       tieslawproposedbythegovernmentagainsttheexistinglawandagainstthewa-
                       tered-downalternative.

                       Theresultswerestriking.Undertheexistinglaw,Mexicoranked125of145countries
                       measuredbytheDoing Businessinvestorprotectionindex,withsomeoftheweakest
                       protectionsintheworldforminorityshareholders.AmongLatinAmericancoun-
                       triesmeasured,onlyHondurasandVenezuelahadweakerinvestorprotection.

                       If Mexico passed the law as presented by the Ministry of Finance, Mexico would
                       shootuptherankingindex92spots--to33."Sincewe'rethe20thlargesteconomyin
                       theworld,wethoughtweshouldberankedaround20ontheDoing Businessrank-
                       ings.Butevenwiththeimprovement,westillhoverinthe30s.Westillhaveworkto
                       do,"saidoneMinistryofFinanceofficial.Underthealternativelaw,Mexico'srank
                       wouldfallto132.

Disclosure and director liability--two key provisions
                       The difference hinged on disclosure and FIGURE 6
                       director liability provisions. The law pro- Protecting investors in Mexico--
                                                                    big improvements
                       posedbythegovernmentstrengtheneddis-
                                                                    Doing business indicator score (0�10)
                       closurerequirementsfordirectorswhoface              8
                       aconflictofinterestintheirdealingswith
                       the firm. It also broadened the company's            6                              6 New law
                       responsibility to report any transactions                                           5 Old law
                       withcompanyinsiders.Andthelawmade
                       it easier for shareholders to hold directors
                                                                                             3
                       accountable for actions harming the com-
                       pany. Mexico's performance on the Doing
                       Business "extentofdisclosureindex"under                               0
                       theproposedlawwouldincreasefrom6to Extent of               Extent of        Ease of
                       8(onascaleof0to10),anditsscoreonthe disclosure              director     shareholder
                                                                                   liability         suit
                       "extentofdirectorliability"wouldrisefrom
                       0to3(figure6).

                       Withtheproposedamendments,however,Mexico'sperformanceonthe"extentof
                       disclosureindex"wouldslidebackwardssignificantly.Theopponents'billremoved
                       allrequirementsforacompanytoreportlargetransactionswithadirectororcon-
                       trolling shareholder immediately to the marketplace and in the annual report. It
                       alsoremovedanyobligationforthedirectororcontrollingshareholdertodisclosea
                       conflictofinteresttotheboard.

                       Minister Diaz presented these results to Congress, along with myriad other rea-
                       sonstopassthenewlawuntouched."Thesimulationsstirredenormousinterestin
                       CongressandinthemediabyshowingthedramaticdifferencesinMexico'sbusi-
                       ness environment if the law were not adopted," says one of the bill's proponents.
0

Protecting Investors   CASE STUDY: MEXICO




                       "Ifapprovedasproposedbythegovernment,thenewlawwouldenhanceinvestor
                       protectionandfosterinvestmentinpubliclytradedandevenprivatelyheldcompa-
                       nies.Butifthechangesproposedbytheoutsidegroupwereaccepted,theopposite
                       wouldhappen."

                       Thebillpassedthelowerchamberwithouttheamendmentson6December2005
                       and was confirmed by the Senate a few days later. Heads of manufacturing and
                       investment companies lobbied for its passage, thanks to the tireless work of the
                       reformerstoworkwithlocalbusinessleadersandtheircounselwhiledrafting.The
                       newlaw(LeydelMercadodeValores)cameintoeffect28June2006.

What does the new law do? Attack self-dealing
                       TheLeydelMercadodeValores:

                       � Definesclearlythedutiesofcompanydirectors.
                       � Heightens disclosure requirements for related-party transactions (transactions
                         involvingaconflictofinterestwithacompanyinsider).
                       � Requirescommitteesofindependentboardmemberstoreviewexecutivecom-
                         pensationandrelated-partytransactionsinpubliclytradedcompanies.
                       � Lowerstheownershipthresholdforminorityshareholderstosuefordamages.
                       � FormallyestablishesthesubpoenapowerofMexicanregulators.
                       � Increasescriminalpenaltiesforcorporatecrimes.
                       Thelawattackedself-dealing.Previouslegislationgaveboardmembers,directors,
                       andshareholdersbroadandimpreciseresponsibilitybenchmarks.Thenewlegisla-
                       tionpresents2distinctdutiesfortheboardofdirectorsofapubliclyheldcorpora-
                       tion.

                       First,adutyofcare.Boardmembersmustfulfilltheirdutiesingoodfaithandplace
                       thebestinterestsofthecorporationandtheentitiescontrolledbyitabovetheirown
                       personalinterests.Theymustattendboardorcommitteemeetingsanddiscloseall
                       informationnecessarytomakedecisions.

                       Second,adutyofloyalty.Thisdutyforbidsdirectorsandindividualswithdecision-
                       making authority over the corporation from diverting to themselves or to other
                       personsabusinessopportunitythatbelongstothecorporation,withoutalegitimate
                       cause.Theycannotfavorashareholderorgroupofshareholdersattheexpenseof
                       others.Norcantheyvoteonissuesinwhichtheyhaveaconflictofinterest,ormake
                       inappropriateuseofprivilegedinformation.Beyondthesebroadfiduciaryobliga-
                       tions, the law provides a nonexhaustive list of activities considered disloyal and
                       behaviorsthatconstitutealackofdiligence.

                       "Fiduciarydutyisthefoundationthatholdsupthebuilding,"remarksoneMexican
                       securitiesexpert."Before,thelawwastoobroadandimprecise.Itsaidyoucould
                                                                                                    

Protecting Investors   CASE STUDY: MEXICO




                       doeverythingtosomeone,butintheendyoucouldn'tdoanything.Itwasabomb
                       without a fuse." The new law blended broad concepts with specific examples of
                       whatthelawmakershadinmind.Theresult,impermeabletoloopholes,isenforce-
                       ablebyjudges.

                       The new law also extends corporate governance obligations to subsidiaries. And
                       finally,thelawrequireslistedcompaniestosetupcommitteesofindependentdirec-
                       tors.Thesecommitteesreviewdealsinvolvingseniorexecutives,limitingexecutives'
                       abilitytousethecompanyresourcestofundlavishlifestylesorenrichthemselvesat
                       companyexpense.

                       Lawyersenthusiasticallygreetedthegreaterdisclosureforcorporateactivitiesand
                       strongerstandardsfordirectors'obligations."Itkeepstheproperbalancebetween
                       protection of minority shareholders and protection of the company from overly
                       burdensome regulatory compliance," says one practitioner. "The main tension in
                       thelawisnotaproblemofshareholdersinapulverizedmarket.Itismoreamat-
                       terofputtingaminorityshareholderonthesamelevelasthelargeshareholders,"
                       addedanother.

Introducing a new corporate form--the SAPI
                       Thenewlawdidn'tonlytargetlistedcompanies.Facingagapbetweenstrongcor-
                       porategovernanceprovisionsforlistedcompaniesunderthenewsecuritieslawand
                       weakerregulationsforprivatecompaniesunderthecompanylaw,drafterssoughta
                       middlegroundforlargerprivatecompaniesseekingabroaderinvestorbase.They
                       founditinanewtypeofcorporateform:onewhoseadoptionisoptional,butwhich
                       offersenhancedcorporategovernance,minorityrightsandbetteraccesstothestock
                       marketasawaytoattractminorityinvestors.

                       That new corporate form is the Sociedades An�nimas Promotoras de Inversi�n
                       (SAPI).SAPIsarestockcorporationsthatofferminorityshareholderstherightto
                       appoint board members, call for extraordinary shareholders meetings, bring civil
                       actionsagainstboardmembers,andpostponevotingwithlowerownershipthresh-
                       oldlevelsthaninothercorporateforms.Inexchangeforvoluntarilyadoptingthese
                       provisions, SAPIs enjoy exemptions from the general corporations law to allow
                       shareholdervotingagreements,tag-alonganddrag-alongrights,buy-backmecha-
                       nismsfortheredemptionofshares,andrestrictionsonpreemptiveandexitrights.

                       AuthoritieshopeSAPIswillbolsterthelownumbersofnewofferingsontheMexi-
                       cansecuritiesmarketbycreatingabreedinggroundforlistedcompanies."Compa-
                       niesthatadopttheSAPIregimewillsignalpotentialinvestorsthatthecompanyisa
                       goodrecipientofprivateequitywithacrediblelegalcommitmenttohonorthecor-
                       poraterightsofinvestors,"announcesoneSAPIpromoter.Evenwithoutanultimate
                       listingonthestockmarket,theregulatorsaimtoincreasemedium-sizecompanies'
                       accesstoequityfinancingthroughthenewstructurewithoutoverloadingthemwith
                       complicatedcompliancerequirements.


Protecting Investors   CASE STUDY: MEXICO




The initial impact--balance, transparency, openness
                       Initialsignsindicatethatinvestorsarehappywiththenewsecuritieslaw."Beforethe
                       newlaw,investorswerediscouragedbythefamilydominationofMexicanfirms,"
                       saysoneMexicanlawyerwhorepresentsMexicanandforeigninvestors."Previously,
                       investorsandjointventurepartnershadtobattleforthe51%share.Lawyershadto
                       beextremelycreativetogetprotectionsfortheirclients.Andwewereneverquite
                       surethatthejudgeswouldupholdtheprotectionsweworkedintothebylaws."Now
                       localbusinessesandforeigninvestorsfeelthenewlawhasincreasedbalance,trans-
                       parency,andopenness.

                       Thisgreaterconfidenceissupported FIGURE 7
                       by market indicators. The value of Mexico's stock performance soars
                                                          �ndice de Precios y Cotizaciones
                       sharesandotherequitiesontheMex-
                       ican stock exchange increased over 25,000
                       the previous year by 13.1% in the
                       firstquarterof2006and15.1%inthe 20,000
                       second--the 2 quarters immediately
                       followingpassageofthenewlaw.The 15,000
                       market has continued to perform
                       well over time: the IPC, Mexico's 10,000
                       primary stock market index, shows
                       asteadyincreasebetweenpassageof                  2004           2005 2006 2007

                       thenewlawandMarch2007(figure
                       7).TheMexicanstockmarketalsorecordedahistoricalhighinforeigndirectinvest-
                       ment,at$128,813million,withinayearofpassingthelaw--a20.89%increasefrom
                       thebeginningof2006.AndprivateinvestmentfundsinMexicoincreasedby84%in
                       2006overtheyearbefore.Themanyinfluencesoninvestmentflowsmakeitdifficult
                       toattributethesemovementsdirectlytothenewlegislation,butsuchfiguressupport
                       thegeneralargumentthatMexicohasbecomemoreattractivetoinvestors.

                       Businessesaretakingadvantageofthelaw'sinnovationsaswell.Morethan40SAPIs
                       havebeencreated,voluntarilyadoptingstrictercorporategovernancerulestoattract
                       moreexternalfinancing.TheNationalAssociationofCorporateLawyers,American
                       ChamberofCommerce,C�maradeComercio,BarraMexicana,MexicanAssocia-
                       tionofFinancialLaw,Asociaci�nMexicanadeCapitalPrivado,andtheAsociaci�n
                       MexicanadeInstitucionesBurs�tileshaveallheldworkshopsonthebenefitsofthe
                       SAPIforcompaniesandinvestorsalike.
                                                                                                        

Protecting Investors   CASE STUDY: MEXICO




Opposition continues
                       Yetoppositiontothenewlawcontinues.Assoonasitcameintoforce,themedia
                       groupthatwasinitiallythemostactivecriticofthelawchallenged54ofitsarticles.
                       Thegroup'sallegations:

                       � TheCNBV'snewabilitytoissuesanctionspriortoalegalprocedureinfrontof
                         the court violates the constitutionally protected right to be presumed innocent
                         untilprovenguilty.
                       � Thelaw'snewdutiesfordirectorsandauditorsviolatetheirconstitutionalrightto
                         work.
                       On18September2006aMexicanadministrativejudgefoundinfavorfor3ofthe
                       group'scompanies,sothe54articleswillnotapplytothesecompaniesuntilafinal
                       decision on the provisions' constitutionality. The provisions in question, if found
                       unconstitutional,couldberevokedfortheentirepopulace.AsofMarch2007,there
                       hadbeennofinaldecisiononthematter.

Talking with stakeholders--priceless
                       Despite this threat, lasting lessons arise from Mexico's securities law reform. Pri-
                       mary among them is the value of involving stakeholders early on in the process.
                       "Throughthedraftingcommittee,businessgroupswereabletomaketheirpoints
                       abouttheproposedregulations.Andthenwe,astheregulators,madeourpoints.In
                       theendwecametocommongroundthatserveduswellduringthepoliticalfight,"
                       explains one reformer. "But you can't elaborate along the way with them," warns
                       another."Thatwayyoulosethepen.Youmusthavethevision,presentacomplete
                       draft,andtakemodifications."

                       Mexico'spolicymakershavesinceincorporatedtheselessonsintomajorlegislative
                       efforts."Whatwepassedwastoorevolutionarytoregulatebyimposition,"saysone
                       drafter."Theopen,inclusiveprocessledtoabetterlaw."Hewasclearonitsvalue:
                       "AsMasterCardsays,priceless."




Adding a million taxpayers
RitaRamalho


                      Mosttaxreformshave1goal:increasetaxrevenues.Egyptisnoexception.Witha
                      budgetdeficitin2004of�E40billion,8.3%ofgrossdomesticproduct(GDP),Egypt
                      hadtoreform.FinanceMinisterYoussefBoutros-Ghalisaid,"Doingnothingisdefi-
                      nitelynotthesolution.Thegreatestenemytoreformsisinertia."Egyptdidnotstand
                      still.Afterreform,taxreturnfilingsincreasednearly50%andincometaxrevenues
                      grewasashareofGDP,evenwithratecuts.

                      With8.2millionpeopleintheinformalsector,37%oftheworkforce,therewasa
                      greatopportunityforbroadeningthetaxbaseandincreasingrevenues.Taxevasion
                      wasthenorm,withmutualdistrustbetweentaxpayersandtaxauthorities.Taxrates
                      werehigh.Egyptcharged32�40%oncorporateincome,morethantwicethe15%
                      inJordanandLebanon.AndEgyptwasthesecondworstintheregionineaseof
                      payingtaxes.

                      InJuly2004anewcabinettookofficewithamandatetoreform.Oneofitsgoalswas
                      toincreaseemploymentthroughinvestment.Todoso,ahighprioritywasplacedon
                      amendingthetaxlaw,customslaw,andcustomstariffsandonenactingcompetition
                      andantitrustlaws.MakingEgyptiantaxlawclosertointernationalpracticewould
                      increaseEgypt'scompetitivenessanditsattractivenessasadestinationforforeign
                      investment.

                      The boldest reform would be to simplify tax law so that every business faces the
                      sametaxburden--withnoexemptions,taxholidays,orspecialtreatmentsforlarge
                      orforeignbusinesses.Manytaxlawsstartthatway.Butwhenhardtimescomeand
                      governmentsneedrevenue,theyoftenraisetaxrates.Andlargeorwellconnected
                      businesses usually get special treatment. Soon the tax law becomes riddled with
                      exceptions,generallyattheexpenseofsmallbusinesses,whichhavetheleastability
                      tolobby.Thispushesthemintotheinformalsector.

Eliminating exemptions and reducing tax rates
                      Fewreformersdareeliminateexemptions,reducetaxrates,andclarifytaxrules.But
                      Egyptdidjustthis.InJune2005theEgyptianparliamentapprovedLaw91/2005.
                      Nowallcompaniesareequalunderthelaw,payinga20%taxonprofit(not32%or
                      40%, depending on the activity, plus 2% as development duty). New tax holidays
                      and special exemptions were eliminated, as was the state development duty. And
                      therulesformultinationalcompanieswereimproved.Egyptnowusesadefinition
                      ofpermanentestablishmentbasedonUNconvention;newrulesfortransferpricing
                      andthincapitalizationareinplace.

                      Thewithholdingtaxoninterestandroyaltieswasreducedfrom32%toa20%flat
                      rate.Thecalculationofassetdepreciationisspecificinthenewlaw,unlikeprevi-
                      ously,whenthedifferentrulestocomputedepreciationgavemuchdiscretiontothe
                      taxinspector.

                      Thepersonalincometaxwaschangedthroughthesamelaw.Thehighestpersonal
                      taxratewentfrom32%to20%.Allindividualtaxpayersgetanannualtaxexemp-
                                                                                                  

Paying taxes         CASE STUDY: EGYPT




                     tionof�E4,000.Benefitsinkind,suchasmedicalinsurance,arenowtaxexempt.
                     Andthetaxbasenowincludesresidentsworkingabroadandnonresidentsworking
                     inEgypt.

                     Taxationadministrationalsoimproved.Self-assessmentreplacedadministrativeas-
                     sessment,essentialforthetaxreform.AsBoutros-Ghalisays,"Thepointofthenew
                     lawistosaywhatyouwant:whateverclaimyoumake,webelieveyou,noquestions
                     asked,butyouwillbeheldcriminallyresponsibleandaccountableforyourclaims."
                     Undertheoldlaw,thetaxpayerwasconsideredguiltyuntilproveninnocent.Now
                     thetaxadministrationtruststhetaxpayer.

                     The tax authority does not examine the tax return at the time of submission.
                     Instead, the authority thoroughly audits a sample of taxpayers within 5 years of
                     submission.Agraceperiodexemptednon-registeredtaxpayersfromoldtaxesdue
                     iftheyregisteredandpaidtaxunderthenewlaw.Andcompaniescannowsubmit
                     computerizedrecords.

                     Underthenewlawthereislessroomforinterpretation,reducingthepossibilityof
                     negotiatingtaxes.AsAshrafal-Arabi,theseniortaxadvisertothefinanceminister,
                     says,"Bargainingisnotinthedealanymore."Replacingtheoldsystemofbonuses
                     for tax collection for inspectors, the punishment for noncompliance was made
                     moresevere,andtheaccountantwasmadeliablefortheveracityoftaxinformation.
                     Underthenewlaw,theaccountantcangotojailfortaxevasion,andfinescangoup
                     to�E10,000($1,839).Atthesametime,thetaxappealsprocessimprovedtoensure
                     taxpayers' rights are protected. Taxpayers who overpaid are entitled to a refund
                     within45daysofthereimbursementapplicationdate.Thegoalofthereformwasto
                     makethetaxadministrationmoretransparentandfair.

Passing the reform
                     InJuly2004newreform-mindedcabinettookofficeandoneoftheprioritiesofthe
                     newministeroffinance,Boutros-Ghali,wastoimprovetheincometaxlaw.Inlate
                     AugusttheInternationalMonetaryFundreceivedarequesttoassistwithdrafting
                     thenewlaw.Ittooklessthanamonthtoproducethefirstdraft.InOctober2004
                     thegovernmentannouncedtheintentiontochangethetaxlawtoreduceratesand
                     improvetaxcollection.Italsostartedamediacampaigntoinformthepublicabout
                     thepossiblereform.BytheendofOctoberthelawwasfinalized.

                     Thelawwaspreparedsoswiftlybecausethefinanceministerwascommittedtothe
                     project. In November 2004 the cabinet approved the new unified corporate and
                     incometaxlaw.Theapprovedversionwasdistributedtotheprivatesectorandto
                     international organizations for review--and sent to the parliament. Roundtables
                     wereheldwithchambersofcommerce,majoraccountants,andtaxpayersinthe6
                     monthsbeforethelawwaspassedinJune2005.Thelawforpersonalincometaxwas
                     effectiveon1July2005andforcorporateincometaxon1January2006.


Paying taxes                        CASE STUDY: EGYPT




FIGURE 8
Timeline of tax reform in Egypt                                                                                                  Source: Doing Business database.
                                       JUL       OCT             JAN            APR             JUL            OCT             JAN           APR              JUL

JULY 04
New reform-minded cabinet                    The cabinet sets custom and tax reform as the major priorities
takes o ce
 SEPT 04
 Draft of income tax law is prepared
OCT 04
Government announces intention                          Media campaign informs the public about new law
to change tax code
NOV 04
Cabinet approves new law

NOV 04                                                      Little oposition, except from bene ciaries of tax breaks under old system
Government sends law to parliament

NOV 04
Private sector review and public discusion of new law

FEB 05
Executive regulations prepared

JUN 05
Parliament approves new law

JANUARY 1ST 2006                                            Tax o cials trained on new audit                                              New law takes e ect,
Law e ective for corporate income                                          and record system                                              retroactive for all 2005



                                   Thereformmetlittleopposition.Thepublicingeneralagreedthatitwasneededand
                                   washappywiththeprospectoflowertaxrates.Theoppositioncamefromthecom-
                                   paniesthatlosttheirtaxholidays(5or10yearsofcorporateincometaxexemption).
                                   Themajorchallengewasimplementingreform.Alongwiththereductionintaxrates
                                   therewasamajoreffortforadministrativereformwithinthetaxauthority.Changing
                                   fromadministrativeassessmenttoself-assessmentmeantawholenewwayofcol-
                                   lectingtaxes.Thetaxadministrationwasnotverysupportivebecauseitwasunfamil-
                                   iarwiththenewsystemandthoughtthatithadmorecontrolundertheoldsystem.
                                   Ithadtobeconvincedthatthechangewaspositive,donethroughtraining.

More tax revenues--better economic performance
                                   Over2.5milliontaxpayerssubmittedtheirtaxreturns,asignificantincreasefrom
                                   1.7 million in 2005, in part because of the amnesty for tax evasion. This number
                                   may seem low in a country with 74 million people. But not all taxpayers need to
                                   filereturns.Ifthesolesourceofincomeiswageincome,taxesarewithheldatthe
                                   source.

                                   Taxpayerswithincomeotherthanwagesmustfileataxreturnattheendoftheyear
                                   todeclarethatextraincome.Sothe2.5milliontaxpayersincludeonlycompanies
                                   andthefewwageearnerswithextraincomefromasmallbusiness.Taxrevenuesin-
                                   creased,eventhoughthegovernmentexpectedareduction.Corporatetaxrevenues
                                   wentfrom�E22billioninfiscalyear2004to�E39billioninfiscalyear2005,despite
                                   thefallincorporatetaxrates(from32�40%to20%).Personalincometaxrevenues
                                                                                                

Paying taxes             CASE STUDY: EGYPT




                     alsoincreased,ifmarginally,from�E8.1billionto�E8.3billion,againdespitethe
                     dropinrates.Overallincometaxrevenueincreasedfrom7%ofGDPto9%.

                     Personalincometaxrevenuesincreasedbothforwageincome(6%)andforsmall
                     businessincome(4%).Muchoftheincreaseincorporateincometaxrevenuecame
                     fromtheoilsector,whichexperiencedaboominprices.Thisisstillapositiveresult
                     forthereform:thetaxratewascutbyhalfandcorporatetaxrevenueshardlyfell.
                     Sothetaxbasemusthaveexpanded.Morecompaniesarecomplyingwiththetax
                     system--morethanamillionmore.Thetimetocomplyincreasedfrom504hoursto
                     536becausecompaniesarestilladaptingtothenewsystem,takinglongerthisyear
                     toprepare,file,andpaycorporateincometax.

                     Egypt's economic performance also improved. Growth in income per capita rose
                     from 2.5% to 4.8%. Domestic investment went from 18% of GDP to 18.7%. The
                     budgetdeficitwasreducedandforeigndirectinvestmentincreased.

Learning from mistakes
                     Bothtaxpayersandtaxofficerswilltaketimetoadapttothenewsystem.Thekey
                     istokeeplearningfrompreviousmistakesandimprovethesystem.Furthermore,
                     thetaxreformisnotlimitedtochangingtheincometaxlawonly.Anextrastepwas
                     takeninMay2006whenthesalestaxdepartmentandtheincometaxdepartment
                     weremergedintotheEgyptiantaxdepartment.With1taxauthoritytodealwith,
                     companiesdonothavetodoubletheireffortstopaytaxes.Thegovernmenthasalso
                     proposedchangestothesalestaxlaw.Themomentumofsuccessfulreformcreates
                     roomforfurtherreform.

                     The new law changed the tax collection system profoundly. Taxpayers used to be
                     toldwhattopay.Nowtheycomputethatthemselves.Somefounditdifficulttocom-
                     pletethetaxforms.Forinstance,theformforcompanieswithanaccountingsystem
                     is46pageslong.Mistakeswerecommon.Severalsectionsoftheformwereleftblank
                     justbecausethetaxpayerdidnotknowhowtofillitout.Norweretaxofficersfully
                     preparedtoexplainhowtheformsshouldbecompleted.

                     ThesolutionwastoextendthefilingperiodtotheendofJuly,thentotheendof
                     November2006.Theextensionsallowedpeopletocorrectpreviousmistakeswith-
                     outhavingtopayafine.Thelesson:havemoredirectcontactwithtaxpayersand
                     answertheirquestions.

                     Prepareforimplementation:thetrainingoftaxofficerswasnottimely.Itoccurred
                     inbatchesandnewtrainingcourseswerestartedevenaslateasOctober2006.On
                     thepositiveside,taxofficers'lackofknowledgeaboutthelawwasidentified,andthe
                     taxauthorityistryingtosolvetheproblem.Thenewlawbringsmoresophisticated
                     concepts,suchasthincapitalizationortransferpricingrules,whicharemoredif-
                     ficulttoimplement.


Paying taxes             CASE STUDY: EGYPT




                         Thenewresidence-basedsystemismorecomplexthantheprevioussource-based
                         system,sotrainingisessential.Atrainingcenterfortaxadministrationwillbeop-
                         erating in mid-2007. With the self-assessment system, tax inspectors become tax
                         auditors. Rather than assess the tax due, they accept the calculation done by the
                         taxpayerandauditafewtaxpayersbasedonriskassessments.Buttheyneedtrain-
                         ingtobecomeadeptauditors.AsofMarch2007ataxauditmanualwasstillunder
                         developmenttohelptaxauditors.Lessonlearned--preparetaxofficerswell,because
                         theyareanessentialpartofimplementingthereform.

                         TheMinistryofFinancefirstdraftedandapprovedthelaw,thendevelopedexecu-
                         tiveregulationstoimplementit.Theseregulationsareaworkbookthatclarifiesthe
                         newtaxlaw,anessentialpieceoftaxreformimplementation.Afterthatcamethe
                         taxformsandtheawarenesscampaignandtraining.TheMinistryofFinancehas
                         learnedthatthismaynothavebeentherightsequence.Boththetrainingandthe
                         awarenesscampaignswouldhavebeenmoreeffectiveifstartedearlier.

Still a long way to go
                         Boththepublicandthegovernmenthaveapositiveviewofthereform.SherifHas-
                         san,ownerofamedium-sizebusiness,says,"Iusedtopay40%ofprofits,nowIpay
                         20%andIdomyowntaxassessment.Idon'thavetowaitforthetaxinspectortotell
                         mewhattopay.Ofcourse,I'mhappywiththisreform."Thegovernmentseesbetter
                         economicperformance,highertaxrevenues,andhappierbusinesses.

                         OthercountriescanlearnfromEgypt'sexperience.Thefocuswasonattractingnew
                         taxpayersintothesystem,accomplishedbyloweringtaxrates,simplifyingtaxcom-
                         pliance,reducingthediscretionarypoweroftaxinspectors,andseeingthetaxpayer
                         asactinglegally,butimposingharshpenaltiesotherwise.Othercountrieswithlarge
                         informalsectorscanusethisreformasatemplateforbroadeningthetaxbaseand
                         increasingtaxrevenues.

                         MahmoudMohieldin,theministerofinvestment,says,"Egypthastakenstridesin
                         the right direction by introducing these reform actions. However, we still have a
                         longwaytogo,maybeanother15�20yearsbeforeEgyptcanaccomplishthemore
                         difficulttaskofeliminatingilliteracy,improvinghealthconditions,andintroducing
                         democraticgovernance."
                                                                                                      



Speeding up trade
AllenDennis


                        TradeisnoweasierinPakistan,withcustomsclearanceattheKarachiinternationalcon-
                        tainerterminaldroppingfrom10daysin2004to4hoursin2007.Customsrevenuesare
                        alsoup,from115billionrupeesto138billion,despiteareductionintariffs.

Failures of earlier reforms
                        CustomsreformsarenotnewinPakistan.Indeed,computerizingthecustomsser-
                        vicesstartedin1979.MorerecentinitiativesincludeanExpressLaneFacility(1998)
                        tosimplifytheexaminationprocedure,anElectronicAssessmentSystem(2000)to
                        automateassessment,andaRiskIndicatedSelectiveExamination(2002)toassess
                        riskintheexaminationprocedure.Othercustoms-relatedreformsincludeoutsourc-
                        ingcustomsvaluationfunctionstopre-shipmentinspectioncompanies,simplifying
                        andenhancingtheinstitutionalsetupforthedutydrawbacks,andbringingcustoms
                        valuationintoconformitywithGeneralAgreementonTariffsandTradeArticle7.

                        Despitethegoodintentions,customsclearancecontinuedtobecumbersomeand
                        slow.Clearinganimportcargorequired62�113stepsand26�34customsofficials.
                        Clearing an export cargo required 31�46 steps and 17�20 handling officials. Not
                        surprisingly,thislefttradersinPakistanatacompetitivedisadvantage.

Why the inability of the earlier efforts to ease customs clearance?
                        � Thereformswerepiecemeal.Clearinggoodsoftenrequiredachainofprocesses
                          (declaration,valuation,examination,payment,andrelease).Sotackling1linkin
                          thechain,evenifeffective,didlittletoshortenclearancetimeswithoutattending
                          totheotherlinks.
                        � Keystakeholderswerereluctanttoparticipate.Tradersexpectedthatsimplifying
                          thedutydrawbacksystemwouldbelessadvantageoustothem.Customsauthori-
                          tiesexpectedthatanewvaluationschemewouldmeanlargerevenuelosses.
                        � Politicalinstabilitymeantthatinthe10yearsto2002,theaveragetenureofthe
                          chairmanoftheCentralBureauofRevenue,apoliticalappointee,waslessthana
                          year.
                        � Theturnoverofkeycustomsstaffwashigh,hamperingcontinuity.
                        � Customs operations lacked funds. Indeed, a fiscal crisis in 2001 prompted the
                          reformoftheCentralBureauofRevenue(CBR),theumbrellaorganizationfor
                          Pakistancustoms.
                        WhenPresidentPervezMusharrafcametopowerinOctober1999,heappointeda
                        reform-mindedfinanceminister,ShaukatAziz.Together,theypushedforreforms
                        inseveralareasoftheeconomy,withrevenueadministrationbeingoneofthemost
                        challenging. In 2000 the budget deficit was 6.4% of GDP, tax receipts were insuf-
                        ficienttoservicedebt,andtherewerehardlyanyfundsremainingfordevelopment.
                        Further,theabilityofthegovernmenttoeffectivelydeliveressentialpublicservices
                        wasunderthreat,andhyperinflationwaslooming.Reformingthetaxadministra-
                        tionwasthesinglemostimportanteconomictaskfacingthenewgovernment.Itwas
                        notanoption--itwasanecessity.
0

Trading Across Borders   CASE STUDY: PAKISTAN




A task force to review and recommend
                         PresidentMusharrafsetupanindependenttaskforceinJune2000toreviewthetax
                         administrationandrecommendhowbesttoimproveit.HeadedbySyedShahidHu-
                         sain,aretiredWorldBankexecutive,thetaskforceconsultedwidelywithintheCBR
                         and among various trade associations. It looked at all aspects of CBR operations,
                         includingsalestax,incometax,excisetax,andcustoms,andpresenteditsfindings
                         inMay2001.

                         In a big departure from the past, the task force viewed customs not merely as a
                         revenuegenerationagency,butasanintegralpartofeconomicdevelopment.Itsaw
                         themajorbenefitfromimprovingcustomsservicesinanimprovedtradingenviron-
                         ment,withreducedtradingtimes,costs,anddocuments.Increasedtradingwould
                         createjobs,spureconomicgrowth,andenlargetherevenuebase.

                         Thetaskforcealsoconfirmedtheinadequacyofthepiecemealapproachtoearlier
                         customsreforms.Andflaggingcorruption,itidentifiedseriousproblemsinbusiness
                         processesandorganization,humanresources,andinformationmanagement.

A reform unit set up
                         ThechairmanoftheCBR,RiazMalik,wasgiventhetaskofcomingupwithareform
                         program. The CBR reform cell had to grapple with several issues. Should the tax
                         collectionsystembeprivatized,turningtheCBRintoacorporation?Whatshould
                         bethetimeframeforachievingtheoverallobjectives?Howshouldsalariesbead-
                         dressed?Shouldexpertsfromtheprivatesectorbehiredforspecificassignments?

                         ThereformunitreceivedinputoninitialdraftsofthereformagendafromtheWorld
                         Bank,InternationalMonetaryFund,UNConferenceonTradeandDevelopment,
                         and a foreign consulting firm (Maxwell Stamp). These consultations enabled it to
                         assembleacomprehensiveprogramtoreformtheCBR,approvedinMarch2003.

                         AspartoftheprogramtheCBR'sCustomsAdministrationReform(CARE)setout
                         to redesign processes in customs operations and modernize customs services--
                         throughround-the-clockclearance,self-assessments,riskmanagement,apaperless
                         single-window environment, and reduced opportunities for discreet interaction
                         betweenimportersandcustomsofficials.

                         As with the failed Public Revenue Authority Bill in 1998, the 2003 reform faced
                         hurdles.Staffresistedchange,fearingjoblossesfromtherationalizationofabloated
                         workforce.Staffalsohadinterestsvestedinacorruptandbadlymanagedcustoms
                         administration. Government rules and procedures reduced the flexibility that the
                         CBR needed to hire private sector experts and offer higher salaries to CBR staff
                         thantootherpublicservants.Alsoneededwasalegalbasisforre-engineeringthe
                         customs business processes through an electronic data interchange. That's not all.
                         Possiblepoliticalchangescouldremovegovernmentsupport.Andseveralaspects
                         ofthereformagendawereexpensive,requiringexternalfunding.
                                                                                                                     

Trading Across Borders   CASE STUDY: PAKISTAN




Start with quick wins
                         The reform cell strategy was to implement the short-term, less costly, quick-win
                         reforms immediately while preparing the ground for the medium- to long-term
                         reforms,perhapsmorecomplexandcostly.

                         Amongthequickwinswassimplifyingthedocumentsrequiredfortrading--asim-
                         pleadministrativedecisionwithverypowerfulconsequencesfortheeaseoftrading.
                         Tradersneededtosubmitonly1document,thePakistanGoodsDeclaration.Other
                         reformsfollowed:

                         � TheCBRreducedthemaximumtariffratesandthenumberoftariffbands,sim-
                           plifyingthevaluationofcustomsduties.
                         � TheCBRpublishedanewprofessionalcodeofethicsandconduct,signallingto
                           stafftheintenttoeliminatecorruption.
                         � Tosustainthereforms,theCabinetCommitteeforFinanceandRevenue,headed
                           by the minister of finance, and the CBR Board, were given fixed 5-year terms.
                           ThecommitteeoversawtheCBRreformandreporteddirectlytothepresident,
                           therebybringingconsiderablepoliticalclouttothereform.
                         � The legal basis for several of the medium- to long-term measures was sought
                           fromtheMinistryofFinanceandthelegislature.TheseincludedtheCBR'sability
                           toformulateitsbudgetandadministrativepoliciesinspecificareas,tohaveflex-
                           ibilityinspendingitsbudget,todecideitscompensationstructure,andtoadopt
                           itsownhumanresourcerecruitmentanddevelopmentstrategy.Giventhestrong
                           backingforreform,thenecessaryapprovalsweregranted.
                         Envisaging resistance to costlier long-term reforms, the CBR adopted a proactive
                         changemanagementstrategy,seekingtoinvolvestaffinthereformprocessbyde-
                         fining expectations, building consensus, and articulating a clear vision. Workers

                          FIGURE 9
                          Time to import cut in Pakistan                                                      2006


                                                                                                    Total time cut
                                                                                                    from 39 days
                                                         14                                         to 19
                                                       days

                                                                                                              2007

                                                                   2 days
                             18
                           days
                                               11
                                              days


                                          Pre-arrival           Customs and       Port and       Inland
                                        documentation         technical control   terminal   transportation
                                                                                  handling
                          Source: Doing Business database.


Trading Across Borders   CASE STUDY: PAKISTAN




                         fearingjoblosseswereassuredthattheywouldnotbeforcedoutoftheirjobsand
                         thatallworkersdepartingvoluntarilywouldgeta"goldenhandshake."Thishelped
                         reduceearlyresistancetoreform.

Costlier long-term reform
                         Finance. While implementing the quick win measures, a medium to long-term
                         reformwasalsobeingprepared.TheInternationalMonetaryFund(IMF)approved
                         aPovertyReductionandGrowthFacilitywithPakistanin2001,includingtaxpolicy
                         changesandtheCBRreform.TheWorldBankapprovedaprojectdealingwiththe
                         CBR'smedium-tolongertermreformprograminDecember2004,withmodern-
                         izingcustomsbeingasignificantcomponent.The$149millionproject,co-financed
                         bythegovernmentofPakistanandtheU.K.DepartmentforInternationalDevelop-
                         ment,istobeunderimplementationuntil2009.

                         Human resources. Amajorlong-termgoalistorationalizetheworkforce.The
                         CBRisknowntobeoverstaffed,particularlyatlowergrades.Withamovetomod-
                         ernrevenueadministration,lowerskillswouldbeinevenlessdemand.Animproved
                         compensation package for the reorganized CBR has been agreed upon. All staff
                         areexpectedtoapplyforvacanciesandthoserecruitedwillhaveamorelucrative
                         package.Newstaffareexpectedtohavehigherqualifications,andthestafftraining
                         programhasbeenimprovedtobuildcapacity.Forstaffnotrecruitedthestrategyto
                         reducetheworkforceisvoluntaryandspacedover5years(2005�09).CBRofficers
                         with25yearsofserviceareexpectedtoretire.Andanysurplusstaff,particularlyat
                         lowergrades,wouldbeofferedcareercounselingandretraining.

                         Modernizing customs services. Customs procedures are being modernized
                         through the Pakistan Customs Computerized System (PACCS). Unlike previous
                         standalonemodules,thePACCSisacomprehensiveintegratedinformationtechnol-
                         ogysystemtoimplementusermanagement,carrierdeclaration,goodsdeclaration,
                         risk management, assessment, examination, payments, management information
                         systems, transhipment management, status notification, clearance management,
                         adjudicationmanagement,securitymanagement,bondedwarehousemanagement,
                         andataxnode.Thenewsystemstreamlinestheclearanceprocess(allowingforpre-
                         arrivallodgingofdeclarations,electronicpayment,andsignatures)andappliesrisk
                         management.

                         PACCS was piloted in April 2005, and the electronic submission of documents
                         wasfullyimplementedattheKarachiInternationalContainerTerminalbyJanuary
                         2006.Traderscannowlodgedocumentsbeforegoodsarriveattheport,avoiding
                         customsdisputesbecausethesystemautomaticallydeterminestheduty.Thanksto
                         riskprofiling(green,yellow,andredlanes),customsofficialsdomuchlessphysical
                         inspectionofgoods.

                         ThesuccesschalkedupsofarismainlyatKarachiInternationalContainerTerminal,
                         itiscurrentlybeingrolledoutto11othercustomscollectorates.
                                                                                                                           

Trading Across Borders            CASE STUDY: PAKISTAN




FIGURE 10
Timeline of trade law reform in Pakistan                                                      Source: Doing Business database.
                                          2001             2002         2003    2004   2005               2006


Setting up of reform task force


Task force presents findings


Design of reform by reform cell


Legislative and administrative measures


Study of other customs administrations


Customs Software evaluation, analysis and design phase


World Bank approves funding for project


Implementation of pilot integrated computerized customs clearance system


Implementation of full-scale computerized customs clearance system in Karachi


Roll-out of new system to 11 other Customs collectorates


Work force rationalization




Repairing a car with the engine running
SabineHertveldt


                      Commercial cases in the Nigerian state of Lagos can now be resolved in about a
                      year--instarkcontrasttothesituationduring16yearsofmilitaryrule.In1997the
                      average duration of commercial cases before the court was over 4 years, and new
                      casesfiledinthelate1990sdidnotstandareasonablechanceofbeingconcluded
                      withinadecade.Peoplehadnofaithingettingjusticethroughthecourts.

                      LagosstartedreformingthecourtsafterNigeriareturnedtodemocraticgovernment
                      in1999.Thegovernor-electofLagos,SenatorBolaAhmedTinubu,promisedtoput
                      thingsright.Immediatelyafterhiselectioninlate1999,hecreatedajusticepolicy
                      committeetoreviewtheentirelegalsystem.Theheadofthiscommittee,Professor
                      Yemi Osinbajo, commissioned a widely publicized study that showed the judicial
                      systemtobesufferingfromrampantcorruptionandseverebacklogs:99%oflaw-
                      yers polled agreed that the Lagos judiciary was corrupt. And pending before the
                      HighCourtinMay2000were40,000cases,with10,000newcasesfiledeveryyear.

                      AssoonashewasappointedattorneygeneralofLagosinJune1999,Osinbajostarted
                      reformingtheentirejudiciary,relyingonstrongsupportfromTinubu.Judicialre-
                      forminLagoscontinuestoday.Whilesomereformswereimplementedimmediately
                      afterthenewgovernmentwaselected,othersareongoing7yearslater.

Corrupt judges dismissed
                      The1999NigerianConstitutioncreatedtheNationalJudicialCouncil,anindepen-
                      dentbodythatcanrecommendtheappointmentandthedismissalofjudgestothe
                      presidentandstategovernors.

                      Before2000nojudgehadeverbeendisciplinedforcorruptioninNigeria.Tosani-
                      tizetheNigerianjudiciary,theNationalJudicialCouncilinstitutedareviewpanelin
                      2001.Overthenext6yearsitreviewed130judges,recommending8fordismissal,
                      15forcompulsoryretirement,and13forreprimands.Asof2002,21magistratesand
                      3highcourtjudgeswereeitherdismissedorretired--themostthoroughoverhaulof
                      thejudiciaryinNigeria'shistory.

                      On22May2001theLagosJudicialServiceCommissionappointed26judgesfrom
                      diversebackgroundstotheHighCourt,bringingthenumberofjudgesto50and
                      reducingtheaverageagefrom55to44.Theappointeeswentthroughacomprehen-
                      sive6weektrainingprogram,includinglegal,Internet,andcomputertraining.In
                      2003another6judgeswereadded.

                      Appointingjudgesfromvariousbackgrounds--fromuniversities,finance,andcom-
                      merce--turnedouttobeagoodstrategy.Sixyearslater,someofthemosthighly
                      regardedjudgesarethosewithexperienceinareasotherthancourtroomlitigation.

                      Toattracttherightcalibertothebenchandreducethedependenceonbribemoney,
                      judges'monthlysalariesquadrupledfrom$600to$2,400between1999and2001.
                      On top of the salary, each judge receives medical insurance, a free vehicle, and a
                      family house. A study showed that the greatest concern for judges is post-retire-
                                                                                                                                                                 

Enforcing Contracts                 CASE STUDY: NIGERIA




FIGURE 11
Timeline of judicial reform in Lagos                                                                                                 Source: Doing Business database.
                                    1999      �      2000       �      2001       �       2002        �      2003      �      2004       �       2005       �


Tinubu elected governor; Osinbajo
appointed attorney-general                                  � Judge salaries increased 4-fold
Perception of corruption survey
                                                                      � Start of review panel for Nigerian judiciary
22 new High Court rooms
+ 18 refurbished court rooms                                             � Citizens Mediation Centers established in Lagos

First Summit of Stakeholders decides review
of High Court Rules is needed                                           � 26 new judges appointed in specialized divisions

Specialized divisions created within Lagos High Court
                                                                                                   � Second Summit of Stakeholders reviews draft High Court Rules

Rules Committee meets regularly to discuss new High Court Rules


High Court Rules nalized                                                                                                       � Lagos parliament adopts
                                                                                                                                 High Court rules


Court Automated Information System established


Citizens Mediation Centers in 12 Nigerian states


National Judicial Council travels to Nigerian states to present judges' performance



                                    ment housing. The compensation package now allows judges to lead comfortable
                                    lives.Andsince2000,theNationalJudicialCouncilhasgiveneachjudgeanallow-
                                    anceof$1,568forcourtroomexpenses,withauditorsroutinelyinspectingexpense
                                    receipts.

                                    Alsoin2000and2001,22newcourtroomsfortheHighCourtwereconstructed,
                                    and18wererehabilitatedandsuppliedwithcomputers,generators,andaircondi-
                                    tionersatacostofmorethan$9.6million.Achallengethenandtodayiselectricity,
                                    withthecostoffuelforgeneratorsrunningthousandsofdollarsamonth.

                                    In2001,whenthe26newjudgeswereappointed,specializeddivisionswereintro-
                                    ducedintheHighCourtforcommercialcases,land,family,revenue,criminal,and
                                    generalcivilmatters.Eachjudgewasappointedtoaspecializeddivision,depending
                                    onbackgroundandprofessionalexperience.Forexample,JusticeAtinukeIpaye,a
                                    formerfamilylawprofessor,wasappointedtothefamilydivision.JusticeHabeeb
                                    Abiru,alawyerwithextensiveexperienceinpropertylaw,wasappointedtotheland
                                    division.


Enforcing Contracts    CASE STUDY: NIGERIA




New rules for the High Court
                       On16October2000,theSummitofStakeholdersontheAdministrationofJusticein
                       the21stCenturyconcludedthatreducingdelaysanddecongestingthecourtswould
                       beimpossiblewithoutreviewingthecourtrules.ThereviewstartedinApril2002.

                       The10membersoftheRulesCommitteewerechosenfromprivateattorneys,serv-
                       ing and retired justices, the Lagos Ministry of Justice, and representatives of the
                       LagosbranchoftheNigerianbarassociation.Hurilaws,anongovernmentalorga-
                       nizationofhumanrightslawyers,preparedafirstsetofdraftrules,inspiredlargely
                       bytheU.K.courtrulesaftertheWoolfreform.TheNigerianInstituteofAdvanced
                       LegalStudiesthendraftedasecondsetofrules.FromApril2002toearly2003the
                       RulesCommitteemetweeklyandsometimesdailytoreviewexistingrulesandto
                       takethebestideasfromthe2setstoproduceafinalversion.

                       Onimportantissues,suchasintroducingpretrialconferences,acommitteemember
                       wasaskedtoprepareaseparatememotobediscussedatthefollowingcommittee
                       meeting.Heateddebatestookplaceoncontentiousissues,suchasputtingacapon
                       thenumberofextensionsandadjournments,whichsomecommitteememberssaid
                       wouldviolatefundamentalrights.

                       Inearly2003theRulesCommitteepresenteditsdraftrulesatthesecondSummit
                       ofStakeholders.Allkeyofficersofthejusticesystemwerepresent,whichwaspar-
                       ticularlyusefulinwinningoveragroupofopposinglawyers.TheRulesCommittee
                       amendedsomeofitsrulesandfinalizedthembytheendof2003.InMarch2004
                       theLagosStateLegislatureadoptedthemwithoutchangesandinJune2004thenew
                       rulesenteredintoforce.

The new High Court rules include three innovations to reduce court delays and frivolous cases:
                       Frontloading evidence.Itisnowmandatoryforpartiestosubmitallevidence
                       they intend to rely on at the start of the legal proceedings. If the plaintiff fails to
                       submittheevidenceupfront,hisclaimwillnotbeacceptedforfilingatthecourt's
                       registry. Because parties must submit witness depositions and copies of all docu-
                       mentstheyplantouseduringtrial,theyarediscouragedfromfilingfrivolousclaims
                       meantonlytoexertpressureontheotherparty.

                       Deadlines for actions. The2004rulesspecifytimeframestotakecertainac-
                       tions.Forexample,defendantsareexpectedtofileastatementofdefensewithin42
                       daysofreceivingthestatementofclaims.Theoldruleshadnotimeframes.

                       Pretrial conferences. A promising aspect of the reform was the mandatory
                       pretrialconference,aninformalmeetingofthejudgeandthepartiestoexplorethe
                       possibilityofsettlingthecaseamicably.Theconferencesalsolimittheareasofdispute
                       andsettlepreliminaryapplications,suchaschallengestothecourt'sjurisdiction.

                       The2004LagosHighCourtruleshaveservedasamodelforotherNigerianstates.
                                                                                                    

Enforcing Contracts     CASE STUDY: NIGERIA




Automating court information
                       TheCourtAutomationInformationSystemstartedinJanuary2005.JusticeAbisoye
                       Ayo, a judge in the commercial division, has managed it since inception. Having
                       workedintheUnitedStatesforanITcompany,shecloselymonitorsweeklyprogress
                       madebyall300judicialassistantsandcourtrecorders,courtregistrars,secretaries,
                       andcomputeroperatorsinputingcourtcasesandcaseeventsintothesystemover
                       theintranet.Theobjectivewasforalllitigationcasestobeuploadedtothesystem
                       byApril2007.Inthenearfuture,lawyerswillbeabletoregistercasesandfollow
                       themonline.

                       Thesystemseekstoreducecasebacklogandcourtdelays,assigncasesrandomly,
                       andcalculatecourtfeesautomatically.Moreimportant,itwillmeasure,manage,and
                       improve individual and overall judicial performance. Case disposition standards,
                       basedontypeofcase,arereportedforeachjudge.Thesystemwillalsomonitorthe
                       performanceofjudgesagainsttargets.

Citizens mediation centers
                       AspartoftheAccesstoJusticeProgram,5citizensmediationcenters,modeledon
                       U.S.communitymediationcenters,openedinLagosin2000.Inthesecenters,38
                       trainedmediatorsworktosettlesmalldisputesthatwouldotherwiseendupinthe
                       courts.Themediatorsarelegalcounsels,employedandpaidbytheLagosMinistry
                       ofJustice.

                       The5centersinLagosresolvedisputesquickly,freeofcostfortheusers,andthey
                       respond to people's need to have their day in court--without getting stuck with
                       formalisticandlengthycourtproceedings.TheLagoscentershavesofarreviewed
                       morethan17,000cases,resolving15,950ofthemamicably.Partieswereadvisedto
                       seekredressincourtinonly332cases.

Fewer cases go to court and fewer cases stay in court
                       Fewer court cases are filed. Up to 25-30% of all commercial cases are re-
                       solvedduringthefirst5 monthsof theproceedings,andaveragecourtdelays are
                       muchreduced.Furtherimprovementsinefficiencyareexpected.

                       Fewer cases go to court. ThecitizensmediationcentersinLagoshavehandled
                       17,000casessofar,manyofwhichwouldnormallyhaveendedupincourt.Alarge
                       number of cases are now filed at the mediation centers because they are resolved
                       faster,atalowercost.In2005,inspiredbytheenormoussuccessofthecentersin
                       Lagos,all35stateattorneysgeneraldecidedtoestablishsimilarcenters.Twelveare
                       alreadyinoperation.

                       Fewer cases stay in court. Duringpretrialconferences,judgesmeetwiththe
                       parties informally and explain to each the strengths and weaknesses of the case.
                       Theytellthepartieswhattheoutcomeofthecaseislikelytobeifthecasewereto


Enforcing Contracts     CASE STUDY: NIGERIA




                       gototrial.Attheendofthemeeting,thepartiesdecideeithertosettlethecaseor
                       gototrial.Thejudgedraftsapretrialconferencereport,describingthehistoryofthe
                       case,theissuesthepartiesaredisputing,andtheoutcomeofthepretrialconference.
                       Ifthepartiesdecidethecaseshouldstillgototrial,thecaseisallocatedtoanother
                       judge, to avoid conflicts of interest between the judge acting as mediator and the
                       judgeactingasadjudicator.

                       Becauseofthemandatorypretrialconferences,upto30%ofallcommercialcases
                       arenowdisposedwithinthefirst5monthsoffiling.Beforethenewruleswerein
                       place, all cases, once filed, stayed in court until a final decision was reached. To
                       insurethecontinuedsuccessofpretrialconferencesjudgesmustbetrainedintheir
                       newroleasmediators.

                       Average court delays reduced. For commercial cases the average time to
                       reach a decision after filing a case dropped by 38%, from 730 days to 457. That
                       movedNigeriafrom105thto66thpositionintheDoingBusinessrankingsforcon-
                       tractenforcement.Incaseswheredefendantsdonotpersuadethejudgethatthey
                       haveareasonabledefense,summaryjudgmentscanbegiveninabout8months.

Reform is like repairing a car with the engine running
                       Nearly85%ofreformstakeplaceinthefirst15monthsofanewgovernment.Re-
                       centlyelectedgovernmentstrytopushreformsthroughatthestartoftheirterm,
                       asLagosdid.

                       It did not take years of careful strategizing to build new courtrooms and repair
                       existingones.LessthanayearafterOsinbajowasappointedasattorneygeneralof
                       Lagos, 26 judges were appointed, specialized divisions set up, and judges' salaries
                       increased.

                       Manyjudicialreformsfailbecausetheyaddresssymptoms,nottheproblem'sroots.
                       Tobeeffective,judicialreformmustaddressallrelevantissuesatonce,including:
                       attractingandretainingtherightpeopleatthebench,disciplininglawyerswhoen-
                       gageindelaytactics,establishingmoderncourtrules,limitingthenumberofcases
                       thatgotocourt,limitingthenumberofinactivecasesthatstayincourtforyears,
                       automatingcourtproceduresandmeasuringjudicialperformance.

                       Lagosdidnotonlymodernizeditscourtrules,dismissedcorruptjudges,andintro-
                       ducedalternativedisputeresolution.Itstartedafightonallfronts,withoutallowing
                       thechallengestoaffectitsdeterminationtoprovideafairandefficientjusticesys-
                       tem,withaccesstojusticeforall.

                       What gets measured, gets done. Measuring performance enhances perfor-
                       mance.Thisappliestoall,includingjudges.Iflazyjudgesarenotdisciplinedand
                       hardworkingjudgesarenotcompensatedorpromoted,performanceflags.
                                                                                                    

Enforcing Contracts   CASE STUDY: NIGERIA




                      TheNationalJudicialCouncilmonitorsjudicialperformanceatthefederallevel.In
                      May2006officersfromtheCounciltraveledtothe36Nigerianstatestoannounce
                      its ratings of individual judges. Those who scored poorly were invited to provide
                      an explanation. Although the performance evaluation system is still developing
                      andoftencriticized,judgesnowknowtheyarebeingmonitoredbyaninstitution
                      withdisciplinarypower.Thisinitselfhasbeenuseful:thepoorestperformershave
                      alreadyleftthebench.

                      Measuringperformanceisusefulatalllevels,includingthelowest:allsupportstaff
                      intheLagosHighCourtmustnowsubmitweeklyprogressreportsonthenumberof
                      casestheyenterinthecourtautomationsystem.AfterJusticeAbisoyeAyocollects
                      theprogressreports,shedistributesthemtoalljudgesforthemtoseewhichstaff
                      membersareperformingwellandwhichappeartobebusyonlywhenthejudgeis
                      around.Healthycompetitioncandowonders.

                      Adjust foreign models to local needs. Reformers often look abroad for
                      inspiration.ThecitizensmediationcenterswerecopiedfromtheU.S.model,suc-
                      cessfulinlargecitieslikeNewYork.Theydowellbecausetheyarefreeandtheir
                      proceduresaresimple.

                      But highly complex features from courts in developed countries cannot be easily
                      transferred to developing countries. The committee in charge of the new Lagos
                      High Court rules rejected the U.K. multiple case-track system because it was too
                      advancedforLagos.

                      Implementing reforms--avoiding one step forward, two steps back.
                      Judicialreformneedsconstantfine-tuning.InLagosthenextchallengesareestab-
                      lishingseparatecommercialcourtswithtailor-maderulesforcommercialcasesand
                      reducingthelongdelaysbeforetheappealscourts.ProgressintheHighCourtrisks
                      beinglostifreformsarenotextendedtotheappealscourt.

                      Initialpositiveresultscandisappearquickly,anddisillusionoverfailedreformscan
                      leadtoquestioningwhetherfurtherreformsareworththeinvestment.Toavoidthe
                      riskofgoing1stepforward,2stepsback,reformsmustbeimplementedatalllevels
                      andtheireffectsmeasuredconsistently.

                      ThatiswhyLagosisnowturningtoitsappealscourts.Ofallcasespendingbefore
                      theappealscourts,80%areagainstinterlocutoryordersfromtheHighCourt.Such
                      ordersdealwithproceduralissues,suchaswhetherornotthecourthasjurisdiction
                      to decide the case or whether the time limits to file have passed. Although High
                      Courtjudgesmaycontinuetodealwithcaseswhileaninterlocutoryorderisbeing
                      appealed,somecasesaresuspendedwhilewaitingfortheappealscourt'sdecision.
                      This is an important reason why the disposal time before the High Court is not
                      fasterandcaseskeepaccumulating.Expandingthereformsandchangingtheap-
                      pealscourtrulescanensureprogresscontinues.
0



Faster, more orderly exit
JustinYap


                      Winding up a failed Serbian enterprise could take 10 years or more.The entire
                      bankruptcy process was susceptible to corruption by bankruptcy administrators
                      andjudges--includinganinfamousgroupknownasthe"bankruptcymafia."After
                      aggressivereforms,theaveragedurationisnowlessthan3years,andtheprocedure
                      itselfenjoysgreatertransparencyandprofessionalism.

                      The new government that took power in January 2001, led by reformist Prime
                      MinisterZoranini,facedadauntingtask.SincethebreakupofYugoslaviain
                      1991-92, Serbia had become embroiled in one regional military conflict after an-
                      other.Theseconflictsravagedaneconomyalreadyweakenedbygeneralgovernment
                      mismanagement. By 2000 Serbia's gross domestic product (GDP) was half that of
                      1989,publicdebtwas130%ofGDP,andinflationhit113%.Between1994and2000
                      theYugoslavdinarlost97%ofitsvalue.

                      The ini government made the privatization of state-owned enterprises a cor-
                      nerstoneofitsliberalizationprogram.InJanuary2001MinisterofEconomyAlek-
                      sandarVlahoviannouncedthat"4yearsfromnowsociallyownedcapitalwillbe
                      completelyeliminated";inJune,Parliamentpassedaprivatizationlaw.Butitsoon
                      becameclearthatmorethan50yearsofstateplanningandneglecthadleftalegacy
                      thatnoprivatizationlawalonecouldfix.

                      A World Bank report observed that a "functioning bankruptcy law is required in
                      Serbiatoprovideanefficientalternativetothemethodsofprivatizationofsocialand
                      statecapitalsetoutinthePrivatizationLaw."TheMinistryofEconomyestimated
                      that 3,000 enterprises were irretrievably inefficient and impossible to privatize
                      throughregularauctionsandtenders.Theywouldfirsthavetoberestructuredand
                      thenprivatizedinbankruptcyproceedings.BankruptcyreforminSerbiawasthus
                      closelylinkedtoprivatization.

                      The law then in effect--on forced settlement, bankruptcy, and liquidation--was
                      not adequate. Courts applied it unevenly, opting in many cases for an unofficial
                      and ad hoc "working bankruptcy" that prolonged the existence of uneconomical
                      enterprisestopreventjoblosses.Thelawalsofailedtoproperlydefinetherolesand
                      responsibilities of bankruptcy administrators and creditors, and it contained no
                      provisionforreorganizingviablecompanies.

Drafting and passing the new law
                      Vlahovi,whosevisionandsupportofthereformprocesswerecrucialinlaunch-
                      ingthebankruptcyreform,decidedtopushforwardwithplanstoprivatizeSerbia's
                      stateandsociallyownedenterprisesandintroduce,intandem,anewbankruptcy
                      lawattherepubliclevel.HeorderedanewlawdraftedinDecember2001,delegating
                      thetasktoaninitialworkinggroupthatincludedseveralcommercialcourtjudges,
                      lawyersandlawprofessors.

                      Progressonthenewlawwasrelativelyslowuntil2003,whendonorpressureandthe
                      needtofitthelawintotheSerbianparliament'sscheduleledVlahoviandDeputy
                                                                                                

Bankruptcy             CASE STUDY: SERBIA




                      Minister Mirko Cvetkovi to demand an accelerated timeframe. At his request,
                      a group of 4 Serbian and several foreign experts from the World Bank and U.S.
                      AgencyforInternationalDevelopment(USAID)producedafirstdraftwithinthe
                      timedemanded.

                      ThecoregroupsubmittedthedraftforpublicconsultationwithvariousSerbianlegal
                      authorities,includingjudgesofthecommercialcourts,thehighcommercialcourts,
                      and the Supreme Court of Serbia, as well as chambers of commerce, attorneys,
                      andlawprofessors.Inaddition,thechambersofcommerceorganizedforumsand
                      roundtablestopromoteanddiscussthedraftlaw.

                      TheMinistryofEconomydistributedthedrafttotheMinistriesofFinance,Justice,
                      andLabor(aswellasthemajortradeunions)forreviewandcomment.Afterthe
                      MinistryofEconomyreviewedthecommentsandfinalizedthedrafttext,thegov-
                      ernmentofSerbiaapprovedthedrafton5June2003.Thedraftwasthenhandedover
                      toalegislativepaneltopolishthetextandprepareitforreadingbyParliament.

                      Threemonthsearlier,however,theassassinationofPrimeMinisteriniplunged
                      Serbiaintoapoliticalcrisisthatstalledthelaw'spassage.Afurthersetback:theDe-
                      cember2003electionsbroughttopoweragovernmentthathadnointerestinthe
                      proposedlawandthatwithdrewthebillfromParliament.OnlyinMarch2004did
                      thegovernmentpickupthedraftagain.InJuly2004,Parliamentapprovedaversion
                      ofthedraftrevisedslightlytoincludetheUNCITRALModelProvisionsonCross-
                      Border Insolvency. The Law on Bankruptcy Proceedings entered into force on 2
                      August2004andtookeffecton2February2005.

Training administrators and judges
                      Trainingtheadministratorsandjudgeswasimportantinimplementingthenewlaw,
                      whichcouldworkonlyifthepartieswithadirecthandinbankruptcyproceedings
                      werefamiliarwiththelaw.SerbiaenlistedUSAIDandGermany'sGesellschaftf�r
                      TechnischeZusammenarbeit(GTZ)toputtogethertrainingprograms.

                      Administrators--valuations in 22 minutes! USAID organized 6 seminars
                      totrainadministrators."Theseminarsfocusedonpracticaltraining,"explainsMilo
                      Stevanovi,theUSAIDconsultantwhoassistedthecommitteeindraftingthelaw.
                      Forexample,theseminarstriedtoeducateadministratorsonhowtoworkwithinthe
                      newlaw'sstricttimelimits."Administratorsthoughtitwasimpossibletoperforma
                      valuationin30days--theythoughtthat1personwouldhavetocounteverynutand
                      boltinthefactory,"Stevanovicontinues."Webroughtin1professionaltrusteeand
                      askedhimtogiveavaluationofthehotelwheretheconferencewastakingplace.
                      Hecameupwithavaluationin22minutes--everyonewasstartled."Otherseminars
                      emphasizedotherpracticalissues,fromdemonstratinghowmanycreditors'claims
                      anadministratorcanevaluatein1hour,tohowtoconductassetsales.


Bankruptcy   CASE STUDY: SERBIA




             Judges--observing proceedings firsthand in Los Angeles.Soonafterthe
             releaseofthefirstdraft,SerbianmembersoftheoriginaldraftinggroupjoinedU.S.
             andGermanexpertsintouringthecountry'scommercialcourtstoseetheproposed
             changes.

             USAIDalsosponsored2conferencesforSerbianjudgestodiscussissuesthatarose
             in their practice, the first in Vrsac, a town in the Vojvodina region near the Ro-
             manian border, and the second at Lepenski Vir, a significant archeological site in
             easternSerbia.ThenewlawmetconsiderableresistanceandskepticismattheVrsac
             conference, but the judges warmed to the law somewhat at Lepenski Vir, as they
             graduallybecamefamiliarwiththereforms.

             Some commercial court judges also had the opportunity to observe firsthand the
             workingsofbankruptcycourtsoverseas.USAIDconsultantStevanoviled3groups
             of 8 commercial court judges on 1- or 2-week study tours to Los Angeles, to ob-
             servetheU.S.BankruptcyCourtfortheCentralDistrictofCaliforniainaction.The
             judgessawhowU.S.judgesreliedonattorneystodraftorders,usedautomation,and
             rantheirbackoffices.

             AccordingtoStevanovi,itwasan"eyeopener"forthejudgestoseetheoperational
             nuances of a court that works quickly, effectively, and efficiently: "One judge said
             shehadthoughtthereformsweremovingmuchtooquickly,butonceshesawhow
             thingsworkedinLosAngeles,shesaidsherealizedthat`wewereincrediblybehind
             andhadtomovemuchfaster.'Anotherjudgereportedthat,ifhehadhadtheclarity
             ofwhathesawinLosAngeles,hewouldneverhaveopposedthechangesinthelaw
             inthefirstplace."InStevanovi'sopinion,thestudytoursbenefitedtheimplement-
             ersofthereformasmuchastheybenefitedthejudges:"Foreverydimewespenton
             [thetours],wesavedtimeandeffortonovercomingresistancefromthejudges.They
             werewelcoming[thenewlaw]insteadoffightingit."Stevanovisaidthatthestudy
             toursalsobolsteredUSAID'scredibilityasreformers,asjudgescould"feelandtaste
             andsmell"forthemselvesthatwhattheywerebeingtoldwasnotjustdrytheory,but
             couldbeappliedintheirpractice.

             TrainingforjudgesdidnotendafterParliamentpassedthelaw.BeginninginJune
             2004GTZorganizedsix2-dayseminarsforCommercialCourtjudges,ledbyJudge
             RudolfVoss,anexperiencedinsolvencypractitionerfromMunich.

             In2006GTZorganized4roundtablesattendedby15�20commercialcourtjudges
             and representatives of the Privatization Agency and the Bankruptcy Supervision
             Agency.Theroundtablesallowedparticipantstodiscussissuesinimplementingthe
             newlaw,especiallyproceduresinvolvingsociallyownedenterprises.Basedonthe
             judges' own evaluations,thesessionswerea"comprehensivesuccess."MilosBalti,
             coordinatorforGTZ,observes,"Althoughbothsideswerereluctanttoopenthedia-
             logueatfirst,afterthefirsthalfhour,itwasdifficulttogetthemtostoptalking."
                                                                                                  

Bankruptcy             CASE STUDY: SERBIA




Eliminating delays
                      Lawyers,administrators,judgesontheHighCommercialCourt,andofficialsinthe
                      BankruptcySupervisionAgency,whilevoicingsomereservations,declaredthem-
                      selves satisfied with the reform. One attorney noted that bankruptcy procedures
                      nowmovemuchfasterandthatthereisnoroomfordelaysanduncertainties.Other
                      improvementsincludetheenhancementoftheroleofcreditorsandthemorestrin-
                      gentqualificationsrequiredofbankruptcyadministrators.AccordingtoJayAllen,
                      insolvency counsel at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
                      (ERBD),thereform"leadsthewayintheregion."Meanwhile,theWorldBankcom-
                      mendedthelawasbeing"designedtominimizetheimpactofexistinginstitutional
                      deficienciesinthejudiciaryandthetrusteecommunity."

                      TheBankruptcySupervisionAgencyisoneoftherealinnovationsofSerbia'sbank-
                      ruptcy law, especially in the Balkans and continental Europe. An agency within
                      theMinistryofEconomy,itwascreatedtoregulatethebankruptcyadministrator
                      profession.RobertGourley,oneofthearchitectsofthereform,saysthathisexperi-
                      ence with the Canadian licensing system led him to promote a similar system in
                      Serbia.Thecodeofethicsandprofessionalstandardsforbankruptcyadministrators
                      wasanothermajorstep.Sofar412individualshavepassedthelicensingexamfor
                      bankruptcyadministrators,339arelicensedbytheagency,and237areinvolvedin
                      bankruptcycases.

The law measurably improved all the major areas it was intended to address
                      Strict deadlines. The reforms set clear timeframes for completing particular
                      partsofthebankruptcyprocedure.Theaveragetimeforacompanytogothrough
                      bankruptcyhasfallenfrom7.3yearstoonly2.7.Thisshorterdurationhasalsore-
                      ducedthecostofbankruptcyandenhancedrecoveryforcreditors.Allwage,rent,
                      andutilityexpensesincurredbythedistressedcompanyafterthestartofproceed-
                      ingsareconsideredbankruptcycostsandhavepriorityovertheclaimsofunsecured
                      creditors.

                      Clearly defined roles of bankruptcy administrators. Thenewlawre-
                      quires the bankruptcy administrator to consult with creditors on most important
                      decisions. For example, the bankruptcy administrator must now obtain creditors'
                      writtenconsentbeforesellinganyassets,takingaloan,orgrantingalien.

                      Reduced corruption. Onlytimewilltellwhetherthenewlaweliminatescor-
                      ruption.Butthelawputsinplaceseveralmechanismsthatdiscouragecollusion:the
                      licensingofbankruptcyadministrators;theseparationofpowersamongjudges,ad-
                      ministrators,andcreditors;andcreditors'greaterabilitytoinfluenceanddetermine
                      outcomes.Thenewlawalsorequirescreditors'writtenconsentforassetstobesold
                      throughdirectnegotiationswithaprivatebuyer.

Bankruptcy          CASE STUDY: SERBIA




                    Priority rankings to creditors' benefit. Secured creditors now enjoy a
                    "super-secured" position that stands above and apart from the priority rankings
                    grantedtoothercategoriesofcreditorsandclaims:(1)bankruptcycosts,including
                    post-bankruptcywages,rentandutilities;(2)pre-bankruptcywagesupto1year,and
                    unpaidsocialsecurityandhealthcontributionsforupto2years,beforetheopening
                    ofthebankruptcyproceedings;(3)taxclaimsupto3monthsbeforetheopeningof
                    thecase;(4)allothercreditors.Thetimerequirementsreducetheclaimsrelatedto
                    bankruptcycostsandpre-bankruptcywages,benefitingunsecuredcreditors.

                    Higher qualifications for bankruptcy administrators.Althoughmany
                    oftheadministratorswhopassedlicensingexamswerealsoadministratorsunder
                    the old system, Jovan Jovanovi, director of the Bankruptcy Supervision Agency,
                    reportsthatthelicensingrequirementshavehadapositiveeffectonadministrators'
                    senseofprofessionalism.Thepassratewasonlyabout20�25%forthefirstexams,
                    but50%forthelastexam.Jovanovisaidthatthisincreasewasduetoadministra-
                    tors"takingtheirjobsmoreseriously."

Buy-in is crucial
                    Obtainingthebuy-inofthevariousstakeholderswascrucialtothereform'ssuccess,
                    butalsoanareawithlessonsforfuturereformsinSerbiaandelsewhere.Meetings
                    withunionrepresentativestovetthelawallowedtheunionstofeelthattheycould
                    havetheirsay.Andintheendtheunionscameoutforthelawbecausetheyreceived
                    a(capped)wagepriorityclaimthatnonethelessrankednearthetop.

                    Notallstakeholdersgavetheirunequivocalbuy-in.Despitetheapparentsuccessof
                    thetrainingforjudges,perceptionsofjudges'acceptanceofthenewlawaremixed.
                    Gourley, one of the key people behind the reform, explained that, by altering the
                    balanceofpowerbetweenjudgesandcreditors,thenewlaw"underminednotonly
                    [judges']independencebutalsotheirfreedomofaction."That,ofcourse,waspre-
                    ciselythepoint.Asaresult,thelawwasneverwidelyacceptedamongalljudges,and
                    todayasegmentofthejudiciaryconsistseitherofpassivecooperatorsorjudgeswho
                    areactivelytryingtounderminethelaw.

                    OneuniqueoutcomeofSerbia'sbankruptcyreformistheemergenceofanadhoc
                    committeethatgroupsrepresentativesfromthePrivatizationAgency,USAID,and
                    GTZ, as well as 2 supreme court judges, 2 high commercial court judges, and 6
                    commercial court judges. At its biweekly meetings, 20�25 people discuss issues
                    in the day-to-day practice and implementation of the bankruptcy law. The issues
                    raised--typically5or6permeeting--aretrackedandrecordedonagrid.Themeet-
                    ingshelppreventmisunderstandingandmakeiteasiertogetstakeholders'buy-in,
                    sinceinterestedpartiescanvoicetheirconcernsandrespondtoreal-lifeissuesthat
                    cropupinimplementingthelaw.
                                                                                                      

Bankruptcy            CASE STUDY: SERBIA




New bankruptcy supervisory agency--a great success, but...
                      The Bankruptcy Supervisory Agency is generally recognized as one of the great
                      successesofthereform.Butthereisdisagreementoverwhetherithasassumedthe
                      fullmantleofdutiesitwasintendedtotakeon.Ithasbeenverysuccessfulintrain-
                      ing administrators, instituting professional standards, conducting examinations,
                      andissuinglicenses.Butithasnotyetassumeditsintendedsupervisoryand--es-
                      pecially--disciplinaryfunctions,stymiedbyanonbindingsupremecourtopinion
                      limitingitsregulatoryfunctions.

                      Oneobserver,toremainanonymous,says,"Theagencywastold,`You'retheregula-
                      tor'andtheresponsewas`What'saregulator?Youcan'texpectsomeonetomakefire
                      iftheyhaven'tseenfirebefore.'"Thatmakesiteasyfortheagencytostrayoutofareas
                      itwassupposedtoregulateintoareaswhereitwasnot.

                      Overall, however, Serbia's experience of bankruptcy reform appears to be an ex-
                      ample of a generally successful reform that continues to inspire efforts to further
                      improvethecountry'sbankruptcylaw.




Acknowledgements



ThecasestudiesweresponsoredbytheDoing BusinessprojectandUnitedStatesAgencyforInternational
Development.

AmyAllen,TomJersild(independentconsultant),JimMcNicholas(independentconsultant),KirilMinoski,
JamesNewton,FarahSheriff,ZoranSkopljakparticipatedinpreparationofthecasestudiesbyBoozAllen
HamiltonInc.onbehalfofUSAID.

Doug Balko, Caroline Brearley, Jelena Bulatovic, Wade Channel, Irina Gordeladze, David Gosney, Peter
Lampesis,MargaretaLipkovska,MarioMartinez,StevenNdele,CoryO'Hara,MarkPickett,MajaPiscevic,
AmyCoganWares,LisaWhitleyofUSAIDprovidedcommentsandreview.

ThecasestudieswereeditedbyBruceRoss-LarsonanddesignedandproducedbyGerryQuinn.

Theprojectwasmadepossiblebythegenerouscontributionofmorethan100publicofficials,lawyersand
businesspeople:

EgyPt                                                 FyR MACEDonIA
AshrafAlArabi                                         MileBoskov
Deputy Minister for Tax Policy                        President of the Confederation of the Employers of
                                                      the Republic of Macedonia
AmrELmonayer
Senior Assistant to Deputy Minister of Finance        MarkoCulev
                                                      part-time employee at fX3X
MohamedFahim
PriceWaterhouseCoopers, Cairo                         MilivojeDzordevic
                                                      Manager and owner of fX3X
SherifMansour
PriceWaterhouseCoopers, Cairo                         NikolaEftimov
                                                      Federation of Trade Unions of Macedonia (SSM)
GeertenMichielse
Economist, International Monetary Fund                DraganJovanovski
                                                      Head of the legal department of a labor union
TerrenceMurdoch
USAID, Cairo                                          ValentinoKonstantinovski
                                                      Manager and owner of Etapa Project
VictorThuronyi
International Monetary Fund                           ArvoKuddo
                                                      Senior Economist, World Bank
EL SALvADoR
                                                      SlagjanMijalovski
MayradeMor�n                                          Manager and owner of Infinite Solultions
Director of the Commission for the Study
of Reforms to the Commercial Code                     EvgenijNajdov
                                                      Economist, World Bank, Skopje
FelixSafie
Director, the National Central Registry               AcoSpasevski
                                                      Macedonian Chamber of Commerce
ManueldelValle
Director of the Commercial Registry (June 2003)       DarkoVelkov
                                                      Manager of Vrabotuvanje.com (Employment.com) and
EduardoZablah-Touche                                  owner with Vrabotuvanje Leasing
Head of the Technical Secretariat of the Presidency
                                                                                                             

Acknowledgements




MExICo                                                  Alh.MuktariA.Tambawel
                                                        Deputy Director at the National Judicial Council
JorgeFamiliarCalder�n
Executive Director, World Bank                          YemiOsinbajo
                                                        Attorney General & Commissioner for Justice of Lagos
Jos�AntonioGonz�lezAnaya                                State
Director General, Securities & Insurance, Ministry of
Finance                                                 EmiolaOyefuga
                                                        Senior State Program Officer, UK DFID Security,
EugeniaGonz�lezRivas                                    Justice and Growth Program Nigeria
Junior Partner, Goodrich, Riquelme y Asociados
                                                        PAkIStAn
YvesHayaux-du-TillyLaborde
Partner, Jauregu�, Navarrete y Nader S.C.               ManzoorAhmad
                                                        Ambassador and Permanent Representative
JorgeS�nchez                                            of Pakistan to the WTO
Junior Partner, Goodrich, Riquelme y Asociados
                                                        SERbIA
nIgERIA
                                                        JayAllen,MilosBalti,NatasaCvetianin,
HabeebAdewaleOlumuyiwaAbiru                             PredragDejanovi
Judge in the Land Division at the Lagos High Court      Attorney at Law, Ninkovi Law Office

AugustineAdetulaAde-Alabi                               AleksandarDmitrov
Chief Judge of Lagos State                              Attorney at Law, Prica & Partners

AdolphousAkwumakwuhie                                   Nikolaorevi
Associate attorney at Aluke & Oyebode                   Attorney at Law, Jankovi, Popovi & Miti

JoannaKataBlackman                                      JelenaEdelman
Consultant, World Bank                                  Attorney at Law, Prica & Partners

AbisoyeEstherAyo                                        JelenaGazivoda
Judge in the Commercial Division at the Lagos High      Attorney at Law, Jankovi, Popovi & Miti
Court in charge of the CAIS project
                                                        RobertGourley
AnseAguEzetah                                           Senior Private Sector Development Specialist, The
Partner at Chief Law Agu Ezetah & Co.                   World Bank, Advisor to the Privatization Agency of
                                                        the Ministry of Economy
TundeFagbohunlu
Attorney at Aluko & Oyebode, former member on the       HugoGreen
Committee establishing the 2004 High Court Rules        Advisor to the Serbian Privatisation Agency
                                                        Bankruptcy Unit and to Serbian Bankruptcy
JeanPaulGauthier                                        Supervision Agency
Consultant, World Bank
                                                        JovanJovanovi
DanladiHalilu                                           Director, Bankruptcy Supervision Agency of the
Secretary at the National Judicial Council              Republic of Serbia

AdeIpaye                                                BiljanaKozlovic
Senior Special Assistant (Legal Matters) to the         Advisor, USAID-Serbian Enterprise Development
Governor of Lagos State                                 Project

O.AtinukeIpaye                                          BrankaKuli
Judge in the Commercial Division at the Lagos High      Deputy Director, Bankruptcy Supervision Agency of
Court                                                   the Republic of Serbia


Acknowledgements




RadomirLazarevi                                       DraganaStanojevic
President, High Commercial Court of the Republic of   Deputy Chief of Party, USAID/Bankruptcy and
Serbia                                                Enforcement Strengthening Activity (BES)

AndrejaMarusic                                        MiloStevanovi,ChiefofParty
Attorney at Law, Council for Regulatory reform and    Bankruptcy and Enforcement Strengthening, Com-
Chair of the Board of SBRA                            mercial Court Administration Strengthening Activity,
                                                      Booz Allen Hamilton
MihajloPrica
Attorney at Law, Prica & Partners                     JelisavetaVasili
                                                      former Justice, High Commercial Court of the Republic
MajaPiscevic                                          of Serbia
Senior Legal Advisor, Economics and Governance
Office USAID/ US Embassy Belgrade                     DjordjeVukotic
                                                      Attorney at Law, Council for Regulatory Reform
MomirRadic
Attorney at Law, Radic Law Office                     TanjaUnguran
                                                      Attorney at Law, CMS Reich-Rohrwig Hasche Sigle
                                                      d.o.o.
                                          G
                                  B .OR
                        RS C LU
                 R ME
           EFO
    W W. R
W