Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY A,tt Z gS7 5 jKf/ Report No. 9391-IN STAFF APPRAISAL REPORT INDIA DAM SAFETY PROJECT APRIL 19, 1991 Agriculture Operations Division Country Department IV Asia Regional Office This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (As of end of January, 1991) Currency Unit = Indian Rupee (Rs) US$ 1.00 = Rs 18.58 Rs 1.00 = US$0.054 FISCAL YEAR GOI, States: April 1 - March 31 WEIGHTS AND MEASURES The metric system is used throughout the report LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS CWC Central Water Commission CWC-DSO Central Water Commission-Dam Safety Organization DSRP Dam Safety Review Panel GOI Government of India GOMP Government of Madhya Pradesh GOO Government of Orissa GOR Government of Rajasthan GOTN Government of Tamil Nadu ICOLD International Committee on Large Dams IMD India Meteorological Department PMF Probable Maximum Flood PMP Probable Maximum Precipitation O&M Operation and Maintenance SDSO State Dam Safety Organization SOE Statement of Expenditures ., FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY DAdS AFETY PRO2JCT STAI' AP RA!AL BEPORT Tklha of Contants EagLNd I. L~~~~EDTTI AND PROei.ypM R * ******* *** * * L NI-ID CT&S =ItybmgNJLL=iE ............................ ; II. WATER RRA URCE nEV7ELYOPMENT.... * ..... .*......#.#** * . ... 3 Agriculture in the National Economy . . 3 Development Priorities.. 3 Water Resource Development......... 3 National Ddm Safety Program. .. 4 Bank Group Support....... .. .... 5 III. THE PROJEC ...................... 5 Rationale for Bank involvement... 5 ProjeCt Area ..5 Project Objectives .. 6 Project Description ..................... 6 Detailed Features - National Level . . 7 Detailed Features - Participating States . . 8 Project Implementation, Organization and Management .. 9 Monitoring and Evaluation ..11 Environmental Impact ... 11 Operation and Maintenance, and Cost Recovery . .12 Status of Preparation and Implementation Schedule . .12 Project Costs ...... ........... 12 Financing Plan .......... ..... ............... 13 Procurement ............. 14 Disbursements and Financial Arrangements . .16 Project Accounts, Audits and Reports ..17 Project Benefits and Justification . .17 Project Risks ..17 IV. AGREEMENTS AND RECMMENDATTN. .18 The project is based on the findings of an IBRD/IDA appraisal mission which visited India in December 1990. The mission consisted of Messrs. W. Price (Task Manager), C. J. Perry, R. K. Malhotra and Ms. N. Mattson (Bank), and Messrs J.R. Malhotra, Y. K. Murthy, L. Duscha (consultants). The report has been endorsed by Mr. H. Vergin (Director) and Mr. J. Wijnand (Division Chief). Assistance was also provided by peer reviewers Messrs. G. LeMoigne, P.N. Gupta, and W. Dobisch. This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only In the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. - iii- LIST OF ANNEXES Page No Annex 1: D*m Safety in India ................ ................... 20 Annex 2: Institutional Strengthening of Dam Safety organizations 33 Annex 3: Basic Dam Safety Facilities .............. .............. 41 Annex 4: Evaluation of the Flood Handling Capability of Existing Dams and Spillways .................................... 44 Annex 5: Remedial Works ................... ..................... 48 Annex 6: Dam Safety Review Panels ..... ......................... 56 Annex 7: Expansion of Flood Forecasting Networks ............... 64 Annex 8: Training, Workshops and Consultancies ................. 67 Annex 9: Environmental Assessments ........................... 72 Annex 10: Monitoring and Evaluation .. 74 Annex 11: Summary of Cost Accounts .. 76 Annex 12: Schedule of Disbursements .. 99 Annex 13: Implementation Schedule .. 100 Annex 14: Procurement Schedule .. 101 Annex 15: Bank Supervision Input into Key Activities . . 102 DAM SAFRTY PROJ7C2T STAF' PRAIRAL REPORT I. LQAN/CRQTT AND PROJT Bo-RowXa : India, Acting by its President Exeauting Agenny: Central Water Commission, Government of India Loan and Credit AmnnntA: IBRD: Loan US$23.0 million equivalent IDA: Credit SDR 96.2 million (US$130 million equivalent) Proiect Reneficiarien: Government of Madhya Pradesh (GOMP) Government of Rajasthan (GOR) Government of Orissa (GOO) Government of Tamil Nadu (GOTN) erms: IBRD loan: 20 years, including 5 year grace period, at the Bank's standard variable interest rate. IDA credit: Standard with 35 year maturity. On-lendingr Terms: GOI would make the proceeds of loan and credit available to states under standard arrangements for develonmental assistance to the states. GOI would assume the foreign exchange risk. ProjaCt nescription: The project would strengthen existing agencies responsible for dam safety assurance in the Central Government, and the four states of Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Rajasthan and Tamil Nadu. This would include upgrading standards and procedures for dam safety inspections and review. Rehabilitation works would be carried out at selected sites where deficiencies have or will be identified and basic safety facilities such as communications, access roads, and standby power generation facilities would be upgraded at important existing dams. Hydrometeorological data collection and early flood warning systems will be installed on one or more river basins involving inter state operations. Benefits and RiskR: The project would increase the assurance of safety of dams in the participating states, thus reducing the risks in these states against loss of life and property. The major risk to the project would be inability of the states to fund the local contribution of remedial works. -2- ;ocal Foreign Total WCOQ2antna - - - - (US$ millllon) - - - CWC Institutional Strengthening 2.7 0.3 3.0 Flood Forecasting Systema 5.2 3.7 8.9 States Institutional Strengthening 7.6 1.3 8.9 States Basic Safety Facilities 18.8 5.6 24.4 States Remedial Works 11 9 L.Q= 126.L- Total Base Costs 151.2 20.9 172.1 Physical Contingencies 25.1 3.0 28.1 Price Contingencies L5-% 2$3,4 Total Project Costs /1 170.4 26.4 196.8 FinanDing Plan Local Foreign Total - - - - -(US$ million) - - - - GOI 5.3 0.2 5.5 Participating States 37.3 1.0 38.3 IBRD/ ID} 127-^8 2 5. 1 2 ,, TOTAL 170.4 26.4 196.8 Est4imated DiAbursAment, (US$ million) PY92 FY93 FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 Annual 15.6 16.9 22.9 35.2 33.7 26.1 2.6 Cumulative 15.6 32.5 55.4 90.6 124.3 150.4 153.0 Eeonnmi! Rate of Return: Not Applicable I/ Including taxes and duties of US$7 million -3- II. WATER RPSOURCE DEVELOPMENT Agriculture in thg National Economy 2.1 India has a land area of 3.27 million km2 of which 49% is cultivable and about 16% irrigated. The population of about 810 million, is growing at an annual rate of about 2%. GNP grew at little more than 3% per annum in the period prior to 1980, but has averaged over 5% in recent years. Per capita GNP reached US$346 in 1989/90. Average per capita income has increased, but there has been limited progress in the living standards of the urban and rural poor with some 280 million people having annual incomes below the poverty line and 80% of whom live in rural areas. Agriculture contributes about 33% of GNP, and remains a key sector in the national economy, despite its recent declining share of GNP. It engages two-thirds of the total labor force and accounts for about 18% of India's merchandise exports. Devglopment PrioritiAs 2.2 Development plans of the Government of India (GOI) and state governments give priority to alleviating poverty and creating employment, especially in rural areas. The primary determinant of rural incomes, especially for the poor, is the performance of the agricultural sector. Since independence, GOI development plans have emphasized agriculture and sought to raise foodgrain production by increasing the use of fertilizers, plant protection chemicals, and improved seed varieties. In support of these objectives, GOI has strengthened the institutions supporting the sector and, particularly, has accelerated the development of irrigation. As a result of these efforts, the annual growth rate in foodgrain production over the last 15-20 years has averaged 2.6%, slightly above the population growth. Water REagu're DevAlopment 2.3 The future of Indian agriculture is inextricably linked to the performance of irrigation. India's arable land is fully cultivated: there has been virtually no expansion in net cultivated area since the 1970s. Growth of output thus depends on sustaining and expanding the area under irrigation, increasing productivity of rainfed and irrigated crops and diversification to higher value crops. 2.4 India is a water-short country in relation to municipal and industrial needs, as well as for agriculture, which is the major user. In India, water resource development almost invariably involves surface storage of water, because rainfall is inadequate, even during the monsoon months, to mature water- sensitive high yielding varieties. Furthermore, the concentration of much of the annual rainfall and runoff in the monsoon months (typically 80% of runoff occurs in three months) requires storage so that supplies for crops, people, livestock and industries can be assured during the dry season. 2.5 These needs can be met to some extent from naturally stored infiltration to groundwater, but much of India is underlain either by poor quality groundwater, due to natural salts, or has no exploitable aquifers. In -4- such cases, surface reservoirs, where suitable sites are available, present the only option for assured, continuous availability of water. 2.6 Some 35 million ha are currently served by irrigation by water stored by over 2,900 large dams. The number of facilities owned and operated by central and state governments in India is among the highest of any country in the world. 2.7 Surface storage also provides two other important potential benefits-hydropower, and flood control. Power is a major constraint to economic development in India, and hydropower provides a cheap, and environmentally clean source. Floods are a recurring thteat to vast areas of India. Lives, property and standing crops are 1ist each year. Storage dams provide the means to dramatically reduce damages by storing peak flows and releasing water at lower rates after appropriate warnings to downstream areas. National Dam SafAty PrograM 2.8 Dam safety assurance is of continuing concern wherever loss of life or property would be threatened by a failure, and most countries including India, have laws, regulations and organizational arrangements d4signed to minimize such hazards. Such arrangements are, however constantly evolving as a result of new analytical techniques, unexpectedly severe natural events, or new legislation. Thus, rmxajor reforms to the procedures for ensuring safety in mtany countries were introduced quite recently, for example in 1972 in the US, and in 1975 in the UK. 2.9 The Central Water Commission (CWC) has general responsibilities for setting standards and criteria to be followed in dam safety throughout the country. Through their monitoring and review functions for projects proposed for central support in the State Development Plan, CWC also exercises a broader quality control function, including technical overview of the analyses on which new project designs are based. In addition, since irrigation is a state responsibility, CWC ensures that projects on inter-state rivers are consistent with downstream safety requirements, an important role which individual states cannot undertake. In 1979 the CWC Dam Safety Organization (CWC-DSO) was established with the purpose of assisting states in evaluating safety-related hazards in existing structures. 2.10 In 1982 a committee was constituted by GOI to review existing practices of inspection and maintenance of dams and set out national standards for dam safety. The committee's report-Dam Safety Procedures-was issued in 1986, followed in 1987 by 'Guidelines for Safety Inspection of Dams' which sets out standards which reflect the dam safety philosophy of the International Commission onl Large Dams (ICOLD). 2.11 Inadequate flood handling capability is the most common cause of dam failures. Checking and upgrading the hydrologic capability is thus a key technical issue in a national dam safety program. The CWC-Hydrology Organization has an active program to perform the hydrologic analysis and recomputation of the design flood for some 5:; nationally important dams throughout the country, as well as providing assistance, as requested, to state governments, and performing mandatory hydrologic review of dams that are a part of new major irrigation projects. -5- 2.1k India's constitutional framework gives each state the primary responsibility with respect to water resource development. While the central agencies such as CWC, have substantial authority to issue guidelines, and review standards, they have virtually no powers of actual enforcement. However, the present capacity to carry out effective dam safety assurance programs varies substantially from state to state due to staffing levels, training, degree of experience and procedures. wshile dam safety assurance is a joint concern of the state and central organizations, it is the state which must eventually provide the necessary staff and equipment to monitor the population of dams within the state. Bank Group Support 2.13 India's development efforts have attracted substantial support from the Bank Group. The Bank has been heavily involved in funding irrigation, power, and water supply projects over the last fifteen years, and these projects have involved directly or indirectly some 150 dams. There has been an extensive dialogue between the Bank, central agencies, and various state authorities on the scope and responsibilities for dam safety in relation to specific Bank funded projects in irrigation, power, water supply and flood control. III. THP; PROJECT Rationale for Bank Involvnyemt 3.1 The Bank's assiuitance strategy to India is to support policies and investments that promote economic growth and social development in a context of macro-economic restructuring. The emphasis is on efficient resource allocation, increased efficiency in the public sector, and the appropriate targeting and delivery of support systems to the poor. 3.2 Water resource development is a central element of this strategy. The process of dam safety assurance, which is of continuing concern wherever life or property would be threatened by a failure, is necessarily a public sector activity: an efficient system reduces risks, and helps assure sustainability and full operational capacity of existing storage reservoirs through the early rectification of problems. Based on its long involvement in the sector, and experience with the institutions involved both at the center and in the states, the Bank is particularly well placed to assist India in developing the institutional framework required to support and fully implement India's existing policies and procedures in dam safety. ProUeet Area 3.3 The project would be implemented throughout the states of Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Orissa and Tamil Nadu. The large dams in these states are located in major river basins to provide storage for irrigation, flood control, municipal and industrial use, and hydropower. The priority of works will be established under the project according to urgency and the status of the preparation of the remedial action plans. The total of 947 large dams, and the -6- 33 proposed to receive initial remedial action based on existing information, are distributed among the four states as follows: Number of Dams to St.-AtA Number of LarAae flma A Remedial Actign Madhya Pradesh 608 8 Rajasthan 124 7 Orissa 131 9 Tamil Nadu 9 Total 947 33 Project ObjectiveAs 3.4 The project would have two primary objectives: (a) to strengthen the institutional framework for Dam Safety Assurance in CWC and in the four participating states; and (b) to upgrade the physical features in and around selected dams to enhance their safety status as required through remedial works, basic facilities additions, and flood forecasting systems. Pr.o4act pDesriptign 3.5 In the Central Water Commission, the project would strengthen the existing central Dam Safety Organization (CWC-DSO), the Hydrology organization, and the River Management Wing through assignment of staff, training, technical assistance, provision of equipment, and consultant support as required. The four participating states were self-selected for involvement in the project and each prepared initiating reports to CWC supporting their proposed activities. An additional four states have expressed interest in participating in a similar dam safety project. In addition, the project would support evaluation and construction of a network of flood forecasting facilities in one or more interstate river basins. 3.6 In each of the participating states, the project would support: (a) technical assistance to the State Dam Safety Committee, which has overall responsibility for the State's program, determining priorities for studies, investigations, and remedial works; (b) a strengthened Dam Safety Organization, responsible for inspection of dams, analysis of information and making reports and recommendations to the State Dam Safety Committee; (c) upgraded safety facilities (power backup system3, communications, all-weather access roads, monitoring instrumentation, etc) at priority sites; (d) investigations and rehabilitation works at dams where potential safety-related deficiencies have already been identified, and at other dams which will be identified and prioritized during execution of the safety assurance program. -7- DetailA FtureA-National Levyl 3.7 Strengthening Qentral Wgter CoMminaion (US$3.0 million, 1.5% of base cob 3, Annex 2). The Central Water Commission would expand its existing responsibilities in dam safety administration, hydrologic analysis, and operation of the national flood forecasting network. 3.8 Dam Safety Adm4ntstration and TrainiBg (Annex 8). The CWC-DSO would continue and expand its activities in formulating and disseminating national standards and guidelines, assembling dam safety technical publications, and assisting states directly, upon their request, in dam safety-related issues. In addition, specific training materials would be developed, including computer simulation software for training gated spillways operators in responding to various flood events. 3.9 HdrllxQ.1&±-A-lyia (Annex 4). Recent advances in recognizing and computing the magnitude an_ characteristics of extreme flood events, and revisions to the Indian engineering standards for most large dams, require re- evaluation of many existing structures. Under the project, the approach to assessing flood handling capability of existing dams and spillways would be upgraded. Precipitation estimates, which are basic inputs to computing design flood magnitudes, are presently calculated on a case-by-case basis by the Indian Meteorology Department (IMD). This process is adequate for the limited number of new dams under planning and design, but is insufficient for the reassessment of the large number of existing dams. 3.10 Under the project, regional maximum precipitation estimates would be assembled and made available as atlases by IMD, together with guidelies for selection and application of appropriate values. The cost of this activity will be financed by the project and the work will be supervised and coordinated by the CWC Hydrology Unit. To facilitate conversion of this data into the applicable flood event, CWC would issue guidelines supported by standardized computer programs, and provide training programs for the state personnel. 3.11 The CWC-Hydrology Organization would also have dlrect responsibility for estimating the design flood for the 33 dams identified for initial rehabilitation. This work has been scheduled in coordination with the states' evaluation schedules so that revisions to spillway capacities can be incorporated into remedial action plans. The state hydrology personnel would participate in analysis on dams within their state and thus simultaneously receive training. Hydrologic analysis would ultimately be performed at the state level with the CWC Hydrology Organization responsible for vetting the results. Assurances were obtained that CWC would perform the design flood hydrology estimates on the 33 dams presently identified and would review and approve all design flood hydrology estimates prepared by the states or any other agency. 3.12 Epannion of Flond EQreaating Network (US$8.9 million, 4.5% of base costs, Annex 7). Interstate river basins within the participating states will be evaluated for the potential to be brought into the national flood forecasting network, (candidate basins include the Chambal, Krishna, and Mahanadi). The project would provide equipment to monitor and predict river flow and stage at important sites, communications facilities for distributing information to the -8- riparian states, data processing and analysis equipment. Timely warning of impending floods is of major assistance in moderating their impact, and these facilities would contribute significantly to the safety of structures and reduction of risks to the population threatened by flood flows. DAta4 lAd r'auAR - PArtiniDating Atatl-aR 3.13 TnatitutionRl StrgngthAning (US$8.9 million, 4.5% of base cost, Annex 2). Safety operations in the participating states would be strengthened. The existing State Dam Safety Organizations (SDSOs) would be expanded to meet the required regularity and intensity of inspections and technical investigations. This will require extra staff (about 175 in total) and upgraded equipment and facilities in all four states. Assurances have been received from the participating states that they would inspect dams in accordance with procedures set out by CWC guidelines and adopted by the National Committee on Dam Safety. The states have assured that they would staff and equip their Dam Safety Organizations sufficiently to meet these requirements and that by Auglust 31, 1996, all incremental staff positions in the SDSO being funded by the project would be made permanent establishment positions. 3.14 StatA Dnm Safety Cmi4tta. The dam safety assurance program of each state requires high level overview. To carry out this function, State Dam Safety Committees would be established. The Secretary Irrigation, or the Engineer-in- Chief would be the chairman of the committee, and the head of the SDSO would be member-secretary. Other Chief Engineers of the Irrigation Department would be members of the committee (see The Organizational chart in Annex 1). While the committee is made up of existing personnel, new staff will be required in the state engineering organizations to make the hydrologic and structural analysis and prepare the designs for the remedial action contracts. Each participating state has established a Dam Safety Committee, by government order. 3.15 Basne Fanflitisn (US$24.4 million, 12.4% of base cost, Annex ,). A variety of facilities and equipment are required to provide safety assurance during operation of a dam, particularly where spillway gates must be operated by on-site personnel during floods. The project would provide: (a) communications equipment to warn site operators of Lpending floods or civil authorities of high releases; (b) all-weather roads to allow site access at all times; (c) backup power supplies to operate gates and other facilities in times of disruption of the normal power supply; and (d) basic instrumentation for monitoring the behavior or performance of the dam and to measure water quality. 3.16 Remedial NaXks (US$126.9 million, 64.5% of base cost, Annex 5). The project would support the investigation, design and construction activities for remedial works at selected dams. A total of 33 dams in the participating states have already been identified and categorized by the participating states to receive remedial action. In some cases additional investigations are required to complete the evaluation and analysis. After the full evaluations have been completod the proposed remedial action plan will be placed before the states' Dam Safety Review Panel (DSRP-see para 3.18) for concurrence of the approach, the analysis and solutions proposed before any remedial work is cleared for construction. -9- 3.17 Assurances were obtained that during project implementation, procedures would be established by the states for prioritizing of dams for inspections, initially inspecting all large dams and then making re-inspection every five years, conducting follow-on investigations, selecting and prioritizing those requiring remedial works and obtaining approval from the DSRP of the remedial action plans. As dams in need of remedial works are identified under this process they will be evaluated against the 33 dams already identified to select the final dams to be funded under the project. CWC would assure that such procedures are followed. Assurances were obtained from the participating states that senior design staff associated with formulating the remedial works designs would participate regularly in field supervision of construction activities and advise on quality assurance measures during the construction phase of each sub- project. 3.18 Each state has also established a Dam Safety Review Panel (Annex 6), comprising experts from various disciplines (typically hydrology, foundation engineering, geology and dam design) who would provide independent technical review of the safety aspects of remedial works. The committees will function under terms of reference satisfactory to the Bank. Each participating state has established a Dam Safety Review Panel to operate under the Terms of Reference jointly agreed to by the National Committee on Dam Safety and the Bank (see Annex 6). Assurances were obtained at negotiations that the participating 3tates would maintain such panels with composition and terms of reference satisfactory to the Bank, during the project period. Projact Iplementation, organization and Management 3.19 Central Government. The CWC-DSO would be responsible for: (a) coordination of project activities, monitoring and reporting progress; (b) ensuring that proposals for remedial works have been processed by the states in accordance with procedures agreed under the project, through the State Dam Safety Organizations, State Dam Safety Committees, and Dam Safety Review Panels; (c) training of SDSO staff in standard procedures of dam inspection and dam assurance programs; (d) developing and disseminating to the states a computer slaulation model for training dam operators in operation of gated spillways during flood events; and (e) developing and disseminating guidelines and procedures relating to dam safety. 3.20 The CWC-Hydrology Organization would be responsible for: (a) supervising preparation of the design precipitation atlases (see paras 3.9 and 3.10); -10- (b) directing state technical personnel seconded to the CWC headquarters during flood hydrology analysis; (c) training state hydrology staff in use of the standardized precipitation atlases and associated computer software to estimate related floods; and (d) vetting all flood hydrology analysis made directly by partic- ipating states. 3.21 The CWC River Management Wing may be required to assist the design, procurement and operation for the flood forecasting operation systems. 3.22 StatA Governments. The State Dam Safety Committees (SDSC, para 3.14) would oversee the dam safety assurance program at the state level, and be responsible for: (a) establishing priorities; (b) ensuring that responsible government officers are aware of problems as they emerge; and (c) formulating budgetary -equirements for investigations and construction, arranging for and supervising construction of remedial works, and allocating available funds. 3.23 State Dam Safety Organizations (para 3.13) would have primary responsibility for carrying out the program of safety assurance. The SDSO would: (a) collate and analyze bi-annual inspection reports from field operation and maintenance staff, and prepare a report summarizing this information; (b) make a ranking by hazard (highest to lowest), of all large dams in the state and use that ranking to prepare a schedule of inpections; (c) carry out regular field inspections to assess the safety status of all large dams in the state; (d) oversee full 5-year reinspection (Phase I) and reassessment of the safety status of large dams in the state; (e) oversee detailed field analysis of structures with identified problems, using their own staff, staff from the Irrigation Department, or outside consultants as required; (f) identify dams requiring detailed investigations and remedial action and advise the State Dam Safety Committee; and (g) maintain a record and data base on each dam in the state in respect to pertinent dam safety information. -11- 3.24 The investigations, design, procurement and implementation of remedial works would be the responsibility of the state Irrigation Departments, and executed either by consultants or line departments. The Dam Safety Review Panels (para 3.18) would review the technical analysis, designs and field exeoution of remedial works. Remedial works are extremely site specific, requiring on-site response to conditions observed during construction and therefore the design staff will be required to actively participate in the construction supervision. 3.25 Assurances were given during negotiations that there would be a mid-term review and assessment of project implementation progress and performanco hold between CWC, representatives of each state, and the Association, just prior to the end of the third year of the project. The review will have particular emphasis on the process established under the project for inspection and investigation of dams, selection of dams for remedial works, formulation and implementation of remedial action plans, training programs, and the functioning of the respective roles of the SDSO, the states' Dam Safety Committees and their DSRP. Monitoring and Evaluation EAnnax 10s 3.26 An existing, nationwide reporting procedure requires the CWC to assemble information on the safety status of all dams in the country and to summarize ongoing activities of the states. Under the project, in the participating states, an information system with common format would be introduced to record the frequency and findings of inspections and evaluations, numbers of dams requiring treatment, type of treatment, and number with remedial works underway. CWC would combine the information from participating states with other states to prepare the Annual Report on Dam Safety. 3.27 As a result of monitoring information from the project, CWC will be able to assess more broadly common sources of problems (designs practices, technical assumptions, materials used, etc). These assessments would form the basis of projections for future action programs and funding requirements for dam safety as well as evaluation of existing practices in safety assurance, planning, design and construction. Environmental IMpact (Annex 9) 3.28 The reduced risk of a dam failure would be a strongly positive environmental impact of the project. In a limited number of cases, changes in the size or location of spillways, permissible flood lift during severe storms,and changes in release patterns during construction may have negative local effects. Typically, these effects would only occur during periods of extreme climatic conditions or for very brief periods, and would be minor in relation to the impact of such natural events. However, in a limited number of cases an environmental impact assessment will be performed to identify mitigating measures aa required. Assurances were obtained from participating states that (a) project reports would identify any environmental impact of project works, such as the impacts from a construction activity or the expansion of a submerged area resulting from a reservoir enlargement, and (b) where such changes are expected to occur, the states would prepare an environmental impact assessment indicating mitigating measures to be taken and setting out a time table for implementing such mitigation measures. -12- Opgrationr and Maintananno. and - Rnvr 3.29 Under the project, the SDSO would review the bi-annual inspection reports prepared by the field operation and maintenance staff for each dam, and evaluate the adequacy of operation and maintenance. Assurances were obtained from the participating states that adequate funds to deal with maintenance requirements of dams receiving remedial action would be made available to the agency responsible for dam maintenance. No specific cost recovery measures would be introduced under the project. StatU_ nf Pragatio ndntation Rohasiula 3.30 Of the 33 dams planned to receive remedial works under the project, seven are in a more advanced stage of preparation of final designs and procurement documents. Five sub-projects are in a moderately ready state of investigation and final evaluation, while the remaining 21 have significant technical analysis, designs, and preparatory work to be performed. In all cases, the plans for the sub- projects must be reviewed by the DSRP before being ready for contracting for construction. Basic safety facilities will be procured early in the project period. Annex 5 provides a tabulation of the dams by degree of readiness and Annex 13 shows the planned Implementation Schedule for the project components. Project Costa 3.31 Total project costs including physical and price contingencies are estimated at Rs. 4,560 million (US$196.8 million). Cost estimates are based on July 1990 prices for similar works recently undertaken in the participating states. Physical contingencies of twenty percent have been applied to construction works, and five percent to machinery and equipment. Price contingencies are based on the following projected inflation rates by Indian financial year: ma91 lQ9 ma ma m2 m 99 Local percent 8.3 6.6 6.5 6.5 6.2 6.2 Foreign percent 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 The total project cost, net of duties and taxes, is US$189.8 million. Identifiable duties and taxes amount to Rs 163 million (US$7.0 million). The breakdown of costs by component is summarized in the following table and detailed in Annex 11. -13- ----- Ra.millions ---- ----- US$millions---- Foreign Total Lgl Foreigrl Tatal LQ1a± Eloraign Total Z2jChAn= hagL (M) M%) ComponAnts CWC Institutional 48.2 6.0 54.2 2.7 0.3 3.0 11.0 1.7 Strengthening Flood Forecasting 93.7 67.2 161.0 5.2 3.7 8.9 41.8 5.2 Networks State Institutional 137.4 23.0 160.4 7.6 1.3 8.9 14.4 5.2 Strengthening States Basic 338.5 100.1 438.8 18.8 5.6 24.4 22.8 14.2 Safety Facility States Remedial 2104.6 179.2 2283.9 116.9 10.0 126.9 7.8 73.7 Works Total Base 2722.4 375.6 3098.0 151.2 20.9 172.1 12.1 100.0 Cost Physical 451.3 54.6 505.8 25.1 3.0 28.1 10.8 16.3 Contingencies Price 77A-7 172.7 956.1 =5.9 2.5 =LA Q_Q o.n Contingencies Total Project 3952.4 607.5 4559.9 170.4 26.4 196.8 13.4 114.3 costs Financing Plan 3.32 Total project costs of US$196.8 million, including contingencies duties and taxes, would be financed as follows: ----- JS$ millions)-------------- Category States GOI Bank Total Land Acquisition 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 Civil Works 14.0 0.3 128.6 142.9 Equipn.ent and Vehicles 1.3 3.6 13.7 18.6 Training, Technical Assistance 0.0 0.0 6.0 6.0 and Consultants Design, Superv:.sion and 16.2 0.3 0.0 16.5 Administration Incremental Staffing 1.3 0.4 4.7 6.4 Recurrent Incremental 5 3 c. Qn. operating Costs Total Project Cost 38.3 5.5 153.0 196.8 -14- 3.33 GO would on-lend loan/credit proceeds to state governments, under standard arrangements for developmental assistance to the states. The IDA Credit and Bank loan of USS153 million would finance about 81% of total project costs (net of taxes and duties), including 95% of the foreign exchange costs equivalent to US$25.2 million. The IDA Credit and the Bank Loan would be made to GOI on standard terms and conditions. The states' contribution of US$38.3 million would be included in their normal budgetary allocations for project activities. Funds for implementing the institutional strengthening, basic facilities and remedial works for each state would be channeled through the Irrigation Departments of each participating state. Incremental costs for sustaining activities established under the project following its completion would be met by the individual states from its budgetary sources or by special fees from the beneficiaries of the benefits incurred as a result of this project. Financial provisions to be made by the States are consistent with budgetary allocations for the project period. 3.34 Procurement arrangements are summarized in the following; figures in parentheses indicate amounts to be financed by the Bank. (US$ millions) ProQU.Mi,nt Method Project Element ICR L22ZR 1L NA TOTAL Land Acquisition - - - 0.2 0.2 (0.0) (0.0) Works - 132.9 10.0 - 142.9 (119.6) (9.0) (128.6) Equipment and Vehicles 7.7 7.4 3.5 - 18.6 (3.6) (6.9) (3.2) (13.7) Training, Technical - - 6.0 - 6.0 Assistance and Consultants (6.0) (6.0) Design, Supervision and - - - 16.5 16.5 Administration (0.0) (0.0) Incremental Staff Salaries - - - 6.4 6.4 (4.7) (4.7) Recurrent Incremental - - - 6.2 6.2 Operating Costs (0.0) (0.0) TOTAL 7.7 140.3 19.5 29.3 196.8 (3.6) (126.5) (18.2) ( 4.7) (153.0) 1/ "Other" includes force account, local shopping and the Bank's selection of consultants' procedures. 3.35 Civil NgXkA. Works to be financed under the project would cost about US$141 million excluding design engineering, construction supervision, administration, and the cost of land. Most of the contracts will require flexible construction schedules to meet existing dam and reservoir operatioins. -15- The work will generally be packaged in specialty contracts and may require multiple contracts for work at each dam, sometimes mixed with force account work. Such works will rarely be suited to International Competitive Bidding. For the purpose of bidding, civil works can be grouped as follows: (a) ICS procedures would be used in the event that any single contract is estimated to be US$10 million or more. While no ICB civil works contract is prejently expected, if one occurred local bidders would be granted a preference of 7.5%. (b) LCB Contracts (US$133 million) would be based on a standard document approved by the Bank. General rate contracts will not be acceptable as a substitute of LCB procedures. Prequalification procedures would be used for all contracts valued at US$2 million or more. Foreign firms will be allowed to bid on LCB civil works contracts. (c) Force account and Unit Price Contracts (US$10 million) would be limited to an amount less than US$200,000 each and the aggregate of all such contracts would be less than US$10 million. (d) Existing state procurement procedures (called here, simplified local bidding procedures) may al80 be used for contracts less than US$200,000 provided the contracting procedure is reviewed and acceptable to the Bank and standard bidding documents are agreed to. 3.36 EQu1pmant and Vah{l61s. Items costing less than US$20,000 would be procured through local shopping procedures acceptable to the Bank, up to an aggregate value of US$2 million. The main components of the flood forecasting communication system are not available in-country and will be procured through ICB. Packages of US$200,000 or more will be ICB and those less than that will be the LCB. Except for the communications system equipment, local firms may be competitive under ICB. Local bidders competing under ICB will be granted a preference of 15% or the custom duties and import taxes, whichever is the least. Foreign firms will be allowed to bid on LCB contracts. Standard bidding documents for ICB a.d LCB acceptable to the Bank would be agreed by the date of effectiveness for use on the project. 3.37 ElpoymAnt of Consultants. All consultant services (estimated at US$6 million) would be obtained on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Bank according to the "Guidelines for the Use Of Consultants by World Bank Borrowers and the World Bank as Executing Agency" published by the Bank in August 1981. 3.38 Contract RAviVe. All bidding packages and bid evaluation reports for civil works estimated to cost US$200,000 or more equivalent, covering about 70% of works contracts, for equipment and vehicles estimated to cost US$100,000 or more equivalent, for all ICB contracts, and for contracts for consultant services would be subject to Bank's prior review. The remaining contracts would be subject to post review. 3.39 Procurement of works, goods or services for retroactive financing will comply with the above provisions and where applicable will be subject to Bank review and clearance prior to contracting. -16- amAnlt and !'inannial ArrangAmAntR 3.40 Disbursements are projected over a period of six years. Project completion is expected by March 31, 1997 and Loan/Credit closing by September 30, 1997. Retroactive financing up to a total of SDR 7.4 million (US$10 Million) is provided to cover eligible project expenditures incurred before signing but after November 30, 1990, the arrival date of the Bank appraisal mission. The proceeds of the Loan/Credit would be disbursed ag2inst the following: (a) 90% of expenditures against civil works; (b) 100% of foreign expenditures or 100% of ex-factory costs or 80% of other local costs of equipment and vehicles; (c) a percentage of the expenditures for incremental staff salaries for institutional strengthening on a declining basis starting at 90% until July 31, 1993, thereafter at 75% until July 31, 1995 and thereafter at 60% until the end of the project; and (d) 100% of expenditures against training and consultants. 3.41 To facilitate disbursements, a Special Account would be established in the Reserve Bank of India with an initial deposit of US$8 million, equal to about four months estimated averags expenditures from which project expenditures would be reimbursed. Disbursements against (a) civil works contracts of less than US$200,000, (b) equipment, vehicles, consulting services and training contracts of less than US$100,000, and (c) incremental salaries would be made against Statements of Expenditures (SOEs). All other payments would be made against full documentation. Annex 12 shows the estimated schedule of disbursements in six month increments. 3.42 The procedures for preparing the SOEs would be: (a) project expenses would be summarized monthly by each participating state/agency under expense headings agreed with the Bank and which would be certified by the designated signing authorities; and (b) CWC would collect these which would be appropriately certified and forwarded each month to the Ministry of Finance in GOI for processing and reimbursement from the Special Account. All supporting documentation for the SOEs would be retained by the responsible participating states/agency, and appropriately filed to enable easy access for subsequent review by Bank supervision missions and annual audits. GOI will fully pass on the proceeds of the Loan/Credit, to the participating states in the normal 70:30 (loan:grant) formula in which assistance from the center is passed on to the states, with GOI assuming the foreign exchange risks. In addition, GOI would throughout the life of the project, make available about two months anticipated reimbursable project expenditures in advance to the participating states for the sole use of the project and the participating states would make similar advances to the executive agencies. For its counterpart financing, the participating states will ensure that anticipated project expenditures are properly and adequately included in their annual budget plans. -17- Projaet Anoun~ts. Aditma And RAnrva 3.43 Project expenditures incurred by each participating state/agency %CWC) would be subject to the normal cost accounting procedures and control. The project accounts would be maintained in a form to show: (a) actual versus planned expenditures for each quarter; (b) actual versus planned accumulated expenditures to date; and (c) how financed, showing expenditures financed by the Bank, GOI, and the participating states. Appended to the project accounts would be a listing of the Withdrawal Applications for the period concerned, showing the amounts reimbursed. The project accounting format will be agreed with the Bank prior to project effectiveness. 3.44 The Auditor General of India will be considered the acceptable auditor and the audited project accounts including a separate opinion on SOEs would be submitted annually, to be received by the Bank no later than nine months thereafter. The Auditor General of India would also be the auditor for the Special Account. The Auditor's Report, which would be accompanied by a Summary Statement of the Special Account, would be submitted to be received by the Bank no later that nine months after the end of each fiscal year. The implementing agency (CWC) would prepare a quarterly report on the projects's progress against the plan for each component, with explanations of any delay from the plan and outlining what remedial actions are being taken. The quarterly report will be submitted to the Bank concurrent with unaudited quarterly project accounts. A Project Completion Report would be prepared by CWC within six months of the closing date. Assurances were obtained during negotiations that the above accounting, auditing and reporting procedures would be followed. Pronect sanafits and Jtuntification 3.45 Conventional cost/benefit analysis is not an appropriate measure or criteria for evaluation of this project. The probability of a dam failing (which is small) and the magnitude of the potential benefits (which are extremely large, but difficult to measure in economic terms) are both impossible to define accurately. 3.46 Thus the justification for the project rests on the fact that dam safety assurance is a regulatory function of government, which is undertaken to prese-ribed standards for the benefit of the general public. The standards to be followed under this project, are essentially those set out by the International Commission on Large Dams, which are generally accepted as applicable in many countries. Projent Risks 3.47 The project faces no major organizational or technical risks. There is a risk that states will be slow in making funds available for remedial action or in providing the additional staff and facilities to inspect, evaluate and identify remedial actions for the nearly 900 existing large dams within the four states that have yet to be fully evaluated. There is also the risk that the states will not make timely and full redeployment of staff to the permanent roster. The project design has incorporated the necessary staff levels and training to address the action needed for successful implementation. -18- IV. A Mr TA AND RE*6MMRNDATT6NR 4.1 Assurances were obtained at negotiations from the participating states that: (a) they woald inspect dams in accordance with procedures established by CWC guidelines adopted by the National Safety Committee on Dams, and would staff and equip their Dam Safety Organizations sufficiently to meet these requirements (para 3.13); (b) by August 31,1996, the SDSO staff would be made a part of the permanent establishment (para 3.13); (c) during project implementation, procedures would be established by the states for prioritizing of dams for inspections, initially inspecting all large dams and then making re-inspection every five years, conducting follow-on investigations, selecting and prioritizing those requiring remedial works and obtaining approval from the DSRP of the remedial action plans. Dams identified under the inspection process will be evaluated against the 33 dams already identified for the states to select the dams to receive remedial work under the project. CWC would assure that such procedures are followed (para 3.17); (d) senior design staff associated with formulating the remedial works designs would participate regularly in field supervision of construction activities and advise on quality assurance measures during the construction phase of each aub-project (para 3.17); (e) Dar, Safety Review Panels would be maintained, with composition and terms of reference satiafactory to the Bank, during the project period (para 3.18); (f) there would be a mid-term review and assessment of project implementation progress and performance held between CWC, representatives of each state, and the Association, just prior to the end of the third year of the project. The review will have particular emphasis on the process established under the project for inspection and investigation of dams, selection of dams for remedial works, formulation and implementation of remedial action plans, training programs, and the functioning of the respective roles of the SDSO, the states' Dam Safety Committees and their DSRP (para 3.25); (g) with respect to environmental effects, project reports would identify any environmental impact of project works, such as the impacts from a construction activity or the expansion of a submerged area resulting from a reservoiz. enlargement, and where such changes are expected to occur, prepare an environmental impact assessment indicating mitigating measures to be taken (para 3.28); -19- (h) adequate funds to deal with maintenance requirements of dams receiving remedial action would be made available to the agency responsible for dam maintenance (para 3.29); (i) project accounts would be maintained in a form to show: (i) actual versus planned expenditures for each quarter; (ii) actual versus planned accumulated expenditures to date; and (iii) how financed, showing expenditures financed by the Bank, GOI, and the participating states (para 3.43); and (j) the project accounts and the Special Account would be audited annually by the Auditor General of India and CWC will prepare quarterly reports of progress and unaudited project accounts (para 3.44). 4.2 Assurances were obtained from the GOI that: (a) The CWC Hydrology Unit would carry out the desigr. flood analysis for the presently identified 33 dams to receive remedial action; and (b) The CWC Hydrology Unit would make a review and give concurrence (vetting) of any flood hydrology analysis made by the states on other dams. 4.3 With the above assurances, the project would be suitable for an IBRD loan of US$23 million equivalent, for a term of 20 years including 5 years of grace at the Bank's standard variable interest rate, and an IDA credit of SDR 96.2 million (US$130 million equivalent) on standard terms with 35 years maturity. - 20 - Page 1 of 12 1AM! SqAFEY_ PROJIFCT Dam Safety in India ndia'a Us of Largg nam 1. India has a geographical area of 3.29 million square kilometers. It receives, on an average, annual rainfall of 1,170 mm, which results in a surface run-off of approximately 1,880 km3. It is estimated that only about 1,100 km3 can be beneficially utilized. The primary reason for this is the seasonal disparity of the rainfall and runoff in which about 90% of the average annual run-off of peninsular rivers and 80% of that of Himalayan rivers is available during the monsoon season, i.e., June to September. Therefore, for meeting the year round needs of irrigation, drinking water supply and industries in the country with such vast population, creation of storages across rivers and streams is vital. These storages are created by construction of dams that are frequently categorized by size as simply, large, medium or small dams. It has been estimated that it is feasible to ultimately create a total storage capacity of about 690 km3 in the country. So far, however, less than 300 km3 of storage has been created in the India, out of which about 200 km3 has been provided by large dams. Thus it is obvious that large dams play a very important role in the water resources development of the nation. 2. The International Commission on Large Dams (ICOLD) classifies a large dam as one with a maximum height of more than 15 meters. A dam having between 10 meters and 15 meters maximum height is also included in the classification of a large dam provided its length is not less than 500 meters or capacity is not less than 1 million cubic meters or the maximum flood discharge is not less than 2,000 cubic meters per second. 3. According to the aforesaid classification, India has about 2,900 completed large dams and another 700 under construction. A tabulation of the dams constructed over time is as follows: YAar whan am wan cgmp1etat Nnmhr of D=nm Prior to 1900 40 During 1901 - 1950 210 1951 - 1960 226 1961 - 1970 454 1971 - 1980 1002 1981 - 1989 740 Dates of completion not available 266 Total 2,938 The above table shows that almost 500 large dams in the country are more than 30 years old, with 900 being older than 20 years and 2,000 older than 10 yrs. - 21 - .MnX 1 Page 2 of 12 4. In India the storage dams are mostly owned, maintained and operated by government agencies, primarily the state governments. The primary use of single purpose dams are those planned and constructed to provide water for irrigation. Many of the large dams however, are multipurpose with hydropower facilities and as the demand in the country for municipal water requirements increase, more and more of the storage is shared for domestic purposes. Some major dams are operated by National, Regional or State Electric Boards. 5. Any public civil works facility such as dams, buildings or bridges present a degree of risk to loss of life or damage to property should it fail. All such structures also have the characteristic to change over time in their adjustment to their surroundings and in their capability to resist the forces imposed upon them by man and nature. Dams, however due to the ever changing conditions of the populations located along the river banks downstream, often constitute a higher hazard in case of failure than other public structures. National governments therefore commonly accept the public role for assuring an acceptable standard for safety of dams. The central governments usually establish the safety standards, monitor the safety status and establish programs that require the owner's to the dam to meet the safety requirements in the public interest. The Government of India has acknowledged and accepted that role in regard to safety of dams and is seeking to become more effective in dam safety assurance. The Dam Safety Project will not guarantee that there will be no future dam failures in the participating States. The project will however provide a significant reduction in the xiAk of such failures. CZgatien n~f India nam Baffatg arnni2at.Innin 6. Although dam safety is considered an inherent function in the design, construction, maintenance and operation activities surrounding dams, it has been reorganized worldwide within the past two decades that dam safety, particularly at existing dams, may not be receiving the concentrated attention that it should considering the number of dams in being, the aging of dams, and the standards and criteria viewed as appropriate under today's technology and knowledge. It has been also generally recognized within the international dam safety community that to achieve a successful dam safety assurance program requires a dedicated institutional structure with access to top management attention. Without top management commitment to providing the necessary resources, the program will be lost amid other demands and more dams will become at risk. 7. With the ever increasing number of dams, the Government of India also realized the importance of dam safety and took a number of steps to reinforce its concern. S. The first formal recognition of dam safety as an institutional process and concern occurred in July 1975, during the first conference of the State Minister of Irrigatlon. At that conference, it was recommended that the Government of India should constitute an Advisory Dam Service to be operated by the Central Water Commission (CWC). Accordingly, in June 1979, a Dam - 22 - Annex Page 3 of 12 Safety organization was established within CWC. Its purpose was to assist state governments to locate causes of potential distress and to recommend suitable remedial measures. It primarily functions as a coordinative and advisory body to the States as the office responsible for promulgating guidelines, compiling relevant literature, organizing training and functioning as the Secretariat for the National Dam Safety Committee. The Dam Safety Organization receives requisite technical assistance from other directorates within the CWC. 9. The fifth conference of the State Ministers of Irrigation in November 1980 recommended that the State Governments also constitute dam safety organizations charged with the responsibility for maintaining an inventory of dams, compiling a history to reveal areas requiring special attention and monitoring administrative and technical procedure regarding dam safety. In pursuance of this decision, twelve states having a significant number of dams created dam safety organizations. The staffing levels, capabilities and activities however, vary widely. 10. Appropriate guidelines issued by the CWC in June 1987 were supplied to the states for adoption through the State Dam Safety Organization as distinct from the Maintenance and Operation Organization. 11. A National Committee on Dam Safety, headed by the Chairman of the CWC and with representatives from all states having a significant number of dams, monitors the dam safety activities of the country. Davelopment of-Indian Dam safatg 2rd 12. A committee was constituted by GOI in August 1982 to review the existing practices of inspection and maintenance of dams and allied structures in various states and to evolve standard guidelines for the same. The committee's report of August 1986 constitutes the document on 'Dam Safety Procedures' for the country to be followed by the State agencies who own the dams and are principally responsible for their planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance and their safety. The proscribed procedures for Dam Safety, as embodied in the report of the aforesaid committee, are summarized below: Funti4ona of tha nArn 9afatg C~all In t~ha RIlA1t Each state which has more than twenty major dams should have a Dam Safety Organization (DSO) to be headed by an officer not below the rank of a Superintending Engine.r. The DSO should include a hydrology unit which would undertake the review of inflow design flood after establishing priorities. The cell may oonsist of one expert on the design of conorete and masonry dams and another expert on earth or rockfill dams with supporting technical staff. One of them should have a good geotechnical baokground. An identified field officer from Geologioal Survey of India should be - 23 - hnnax I Page 4 of 12 associated with the DSO. A. rimarg 'nnctinns ef t at& DAM Call (a) Only large dams as per ICOLD definition to be under the purview of the DSO. (b) Technical documentation should be compiled and records maintained. (c) Each state should issue an executive order for inspection, maintenance and surveillance of dams. The DSO will monitor implementation. (d) Arrange safety review of dams which are more than 15 meters in height or which store 60 million cubic meters (50,000 acre feet) or more, by an independent panel of experts once in 10 years. Ce) Arrange for review of spillway capacity of the existing dams and for the necessary remedial action wherever needed. Cf) Monitor pre and post-monsoon inspections and review the irrigation reports for abnormalities. (g) In case of a problem with a dam, on the request of the Chief L&:.neer in-charge of the dam, officers of the DSO should virs&t the dam to offer appropriate advice on remedial measures. If the problem is complicated, the DSO should writs to the Secretary to Government to constitute a panel to review the problem and to identify the cause and to sug^ st remedial measures. It is envisaged that the panel shouA. consist of (i) an experienced dam engineer having backgrzo,und of design and construction; (ii) the Chief Engineor D.S.O. of CWC; (iii) the Project Chief Engineer; and (:v) the Head of State Dam Safety Cell, as member Secret:ry. The panel should have powers to co-opt any expert considered necessary. (h) Compile statistics concerning failures. Prepare the first information report of any failure which should also initiate action for constituting a committee to review the causes of failure. (i) Act as a data bank with respect to dam safety and make random checks of the data received from the Engineer in- charge of the project to ensure its correctness by making site visits. (j) Prepare a program of review of safety of dams in the state - 24 _ Anndaxl Page 5 of 12 both from hydrological and structural considerations. The committee's report prescribes detailed guidelines for fixing priorities for safety reviews and has directed that the hazard potential of the dam should also be taken into account while fixing priorities for safety reviews. B. Apart from the procedures prescribed regarding the administrative set up of the DSO and its functions as summarized in para 2.0, the committee has prescribed, '-n its report, detailed guidelines on the following issues also: (a) hydrological safety of existing dams; (b) structural review including seismological review; (c) guidelines for inspection, operation and maintenance; and (d) emergency preparedness plans. 13. While the procedures laid down by the committee mainly relate to the existing dams, the report also includes brief directions regarding safety assurance in respect to new dams, including the need to establish independent Dam Safety Panels for such dams and to advise the project authorities in all phases of dam building activity. Gndlinem for InspMnt Ion_of AM= 14. In addition to the Dam Safety Procedures' prescribed by GOI committee's report of August 1986, the Dam Safety Organization of CWC have issued "Guidelines for Safety Inspection of Dams in June 1987. These guidelines are for adoption by the states and have been issued by DSO CWC in pursuance of the recommendations of the Conference of State Ministers of Irrigation and assignment of this function to the DSO constituted in CWC in June 1979. These guidelines apply to the inspection and evaluation of all dams/barriers together with appurtenant works which impound or divert water and which (1) are 8 m or more in height or (2) have an impounding capacity of 6 ha m or more. Barriers which are 2 m or less in height regardless of storage capacity or barriers which have a storage capacity at maximum storage elevation of 2 ha m or less regardless of height are exempt from these guidelines. 15. These guidelines closely parallel those used by the US Army Corps of Engineers in implementing the National Program for Inspection of non-Federal dam in the United States and reflect the philosophy of the International Commission on Large Dams (ICOLD). The guidelines as issued are considered thoroughly adequate for the purpose. As periodic inspections are the centerpiece of any effective and successful Dam Safety Assurance Program, it was recommended and accepted by CWC in formulating this project that dam inspections be conducted at 5-year intervals rather than 10 years as conditions will change because of deterioration and other factors. - 25 - Annex 1 Page 6 of 12 16. The guidelinrs consist of a two-phase inspection and investigation program. Phase I is an inspection to assess the general conditions of a dam ind to determine the need for any additional engineering investigation and analyses, including hydrological. It consists of a visual examination of the dam and a review of available engineering data, including operating records. Costly and extensive exploration or analyses are not intended. 17. Phase II investigations are performed where the results of the Phase I inspection indicate the need for additional investigations and studies. It includes, as required, all additional visual examinations, measurements, foundation exploration and testing, materials testing, hdyrologic and hydraulic analysis and structural stability analyses (including seismic) deemed essential to fully evaluate the safety of the dam. 18. The guideline contains furtLer details explaining the content and extent of each of the features noted in the preceding two paragraphs, plus providing suggested report formats and a checklist for field inspections. Con _ption and Fn lation o Dam Safatg ALaUranng _roj= 19. Although the conceptual framework was laid and guidelines were available, some institutional strengthening was achieved, some inspections were performed and some remedial work accomplished, the tempo of dam safety activity in India has not kept pace with the needs and a backlog of potential risk has accumulated. A lower priority being afforded maintenance and surveillance of existing dams can be attributed to several factors : a lack of constitutional authority and/or legislation for the Central water Commission to enforce a national program of dam safety assurance, an inherent aversion to admitting that some dams may be at risk, the attention of state organizations being diverted to constructing new dams, and perhaps most importantly, a lack of funding and dedicated staff to satisfy the needs of maintaining an active, viable dam safety assurance program. 20. Maintenance and upkeep of the dams has been always been recognized as an important activity and almost all the state government agencies responsible for this activity have had determined their own norms and procedures of surveillance of dams through some type of annual inspection and reporting procedure. In most states, budget allocations are made for maintenance of irrigation projects (including dams) on the basis of a set amount for each hectare under the project command area. This type of budgeting procedure is frequently not equitable for either the dam or the canals and distribution system. As a result of annual inspection, routine repairs are carried out within the limits of the budget allocations. However, wLth the increase of state irrigation developmental activities with emphasis on creation of new potentials by constructing new dams, it has been a common situation that the surveillance and maintenance of existing dams started getting lower priority in all aspects of attention, resources and funds. 21. In the late seventies and early eighties the concern regarding proper dam surveillance to ensure safety was recognized at the national level and the creation of the Dam Safety Organization at the central level in Central - 26 - Anne"X Page 7 of 12 Water Commission was followed by establishing similar organizations in most of the states during the mid eighties. Thus, a foundation was laid for a nation-wide and systematic dam surveillance program. However, the paucity of resources in the non-Plan sector has been one of the reasons coming in the way of making the activity effective. GOl and the Ministry of Water Resources, having recognized the situation, decided that a Dam Safety Assurance Program, including strengthening of the organizations involved and carrying out rehabilitation of dams with deficiencies was required and should become a part of the planned activity from India's Eighth Five Year Plan. 22. The World Bank has been extensively involved in water resources development projects in India over the last two decades and has thereby been associated with funding assistance on projects involving approximately 150 large dams in India. As a result, there has been extensive dialogue between the Bank, central agencies and various state authorities on the scope and responsibilities for dam safety in relation to specific Bank funded projects. Following a CWC-sponsored Dam Safety Workshop (March 1988) in which the Bank participated along with representatives of several states, a joint Bank/CWC/state team visited India. This mission set out a framework for state level dam safety organizations. This framework has been accepted by the central government, which is now advocating its adoption by other states. 23. At a meeting of the state representatives of the National Dam Safety Committee held in conjunction with a dam safety seminar in Nasik in 1989, concepts of having a World Bank funded project was generally outlined. Since the dams are mostly owned by the state goverNments, they were requested by GOI to indicate their views on participation in such a project which would include strengthening the Dam Safety Organizations in both CWC and the states. In addition to setting in motion a more rigorous and regular schedule for safety inspections and evaluations, it was proposed that funding also be made available to carry out remedial action on some of the dams known to be needing immediate attention. As a result of these deliberations four states, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Orissa and Tamil Nadu along with CWC (DSO) agreed to initiate the identification reports to formulate the Dam Safety Project. Other states have expressed interest in participating but have not fully developed their requirements for staffing or rehabilitation. It is expected that another group of states may be ready to undertake similar actions within the next couple of years. 24. Since this project is to deal for the present with four states only, it is appropriate to indicate here the number of completed dams in each state and the period during which these were constructed. - 27 - Annex I Page 8 of 12 fiatA T_;F C__ItECE WES IRs MILLIONS STES I/ Y4.curring Staff Nn-ReemrXniah Tat~A2 Madhya Pradesh 30.635 7.131 37.766 Rajasthan 24.250 7.100 31.350 Tamil Nadu 19.860 5.900 25.76 Orissa 21_QQQ 6-764 21-764 Total of 95.745 26.895 122.640 4 States 1/ Recurrent operating costs not shown. - 39 - ~M SAFEY PROJCT TAL INCR NTA I N ANPOWUIR PROVTD1D IN DSAR PROJRCQ TahniA SAW= Totafl C.W.C. 55 48 103 States Madhya Pradesh 50 51 101 Rajasthan 41 39 80 Tamil Nadu 34 Orissa AZ 2.l Total States 167 145 312 Grand Total 222 193 415 - 40 - Annex 2 Table 6 TNDIA DAM SAETY PROJECT TOTAL COST OF INeREMFNTAL STA'W L CONTTNENCJIER TN DSAR PROJECT - (RS. MILLIONX C.W.C. 5 Years Non-Recurring Total (Rs.M) Recurring D.S.O. 16.15 43.6 20.51 Hlydrology 12.65 15.80 28.45 Total C.W.C. 2L_aQ 20L16 4a 90 States Medhya Pradesh 30.6 7.1 37.7 Rajasthan 24.3 7.1 31.4 Tamil Nadu 19.9 5.9 25.8 Orissa 2LI& LA 21.L Total States .5L. 2.LI 1.l Grand Total 12A4Q .47-.0 171 66 - 41 - DaM SkE-:y P*IMECT RASIC~ DAM4AWT FATLTTRR 1. Many of the older dams were not originally equipped with adequate instrumentation, communication systems and other facilities that have a bearing on monitoring the dams performance or assisting in their safe operations. This project will include upgrading a variety of basic facilities at approximately 10% of the existing large dams in each participating state except in Madhya Pradesh where due to the large number of dams only about 5% will be addressed. 2. It is planned that work in this category can be initiated early in the project period since the level of investigation, design and procurement is much less complex than for remedial work on distressed dams. The primary objective of the basic facilities component is to add features in and around the dam complex that will assist in proper surveillance and operations during the monsoon season. 3. A typical configuration of large dams in India is to have a center section of concrete or masonry forming an overflow spillway with crest gates. This center section is flanked by long earth fill sections outside the riverbed extending to the edge of the wide valleys. The overflow gates are regulated during the latter phases of the monsoon season to capture enough of the flow to end the season with a full reservoir. There is always the risk of a late flood when the reservoir is nearly full and operations at higher stage requires very timely and well coordinated gate manipulation to safely accommodate the flood flow. The combination of all-weather access to the dam, communications to the operators and standby power sources for gate operations are facilities that can enhance the safety of the dam during flood operation. Measurements of precipitation and reservoir levels, plus commnication links to civil authorities also contribute to the basic safety of dams and are included for selected dams under the project. 4. The following is a generalized listing of the type of facilities to be considered for selected dams under the project. The features included at each dam will vary according to the needs and no one dam will have all of these features added to it. a) ±toALJUpn.a * Widening, realigning or surfacing existing access roads to allow vehicle access under adverse weather conditions * Adding connecting roads to each abutment if none exist - 42 - Annez.2 Pogn2 of 3 b) Rnillway Atmi 6.ratigrn * Providing on-site diesel generator set for standby power * Providing spare hoist motors * Providing duplicate hand operating cranks or wheels * Providing lighting to operating areas * Providing gate opening indicators c) t#AAnrina f gan * V-notch weirs and collector system for measuring seepage flow Recorders to provide continuous record of seepage flows * Piezometers in earth sections to measure internal hydrostatic pressures * Rain gauges * Control points to monitor settlement or displacement * Reservoir level gauge and recorder Gauge for measuring river inflow * Wind velocity and direction instruments * Wave height measurement * Climate instrumentation - temperature, humidity, atmospheric pressure, evaporation * Siesmic instruments (if warranted) - tWater quality sampling equipment (variable reservoir depths) d) _ni=naton FacilitieR * Radio or duplicate telephone systems to officials associated with operations * Communication connections to upstream villages as observation posts for flood warning * Local warning equipment such as siren or horn * Flood lights or spot lights for use in communications or warning e) Strategic Matarials Stonkpiles e Stone for wave wash protection and blow hole repair * Unfilled sand bags in dry storage * Sand bag material * Timber and steel structural members * Rope and floating life saver rings * Heavy plastic sheeting * Steel cabling and attachments 5. The base costs (without contingencies) for the basic facilities for each of the States have been estimated as shown in the following tabulation. This is a pre-set allocation among the States and once an individual state has expended their sha.:. no additional funding will be provided unless it is a reallocation agreeu to by all states. - 43 - annin 3 P-aa 2 of £tA.ta Am,n~1n Un. Millni= Madhya Pradeah 175.0 Orissa 92.4 Rajasthan 77..1 Tamil Nadu ,7-2 Total 401.7 - 44 - Annax 4 Page 1 of 4 EVALATION OE THlE FLOOD HA LNQCADZ=LI OF EXISTTNCI DAMS ANSPILLWAY9 1. Studies published by the International Commission on Large Dams (ICOLD) on the causes of failures of dams indicate that approximately one-third of the failures are a direct result of floods exceeding the capacity of the spillways. The examination of the flood handling capability for existing dams and spillways is therefore a vital component of any comprehensive Dam Safety Assurance Program. As more records are maintained and data compiled on the magnitude and characteristics of floods, there becomes a broader knowledge base upon which to base the estimation of possible future flood events. Scientific advances in meteorology and hydrologic analysis over the last two decades have given scientists and engineers many new tools and advanced methodologies to allow more realistic calculation of the upper limits of rare flood events. Thirty to forty years ago, certain levels of risks were taken unknowingly by engineers and public funding agencies in sizing spillways. In many cases the spillways were designed only to safely pass floods that might be expected to occur once in 100 to 500 years. The level of ever increasing development in the river valleys below existing dams and new dam sites create a potential hazard to property damage and loss of life that is much greater than in the past. The existing dams in India, which in many cases were designed to outdated standards and with empirical formula for roughly estimating flood magnitudes, must now be re-examined and re- evaluated in regard to spillway capacity. 2. In India, the present standards for new large dams require the dam, reservoir and spillway complex be capable of safely accommodat:.ng the inflow of the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) or if less than a certain height and capacity, the Standard Project Flood (SPF). The PMF is a flood that may be expected from the most severe combination of critical meteorologic and hydrologic conditions that are reasonably possible in the region. The most critical meteorologic event used to compute a PMF is the Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP). Procedures and standards requiring dams and spillways for large dams to be designed to handle the PMF have been in existence in India for approximately the last decade. Existing dams built prior to that time were based on a variety of standards and methods of calculation of the design flood which in general were smaller than the PMF. 3. An important sub-objective of the Dam Safety Project is to strengthen the technical capability of the states to reassess all their existing dams in regard to flood handling capability. The CWC's technical guidance, training and direction of national policy on hydrologic capability of existing dams is a critical element in attaining this goal. The following summarizes the approach, activities, time frames and inter-relationships of CWC and the states in carryng out the re-evaluation of hydrologic adequacies of existing dams. - 45 - Annax 4 Page 2 of 4 4. The first activity of CWC under the project will be to develop guidelines and procedures for making a quick screening of dams within the participating states for the relative magnitudes of the PMF or SPF in comparison with the design flood employed at the time the dam was initially designed and constructed. By preparation of an envelope curve of recently computed PMFs in the region plotted against basin drainage area, a rough Indlcatlon of the magnitude of the PMF for the subject existing dam will be obtained. Those dams where this approximate PMF deviates significantly from the value of flood used in the designs will then become a prominent candidata to be placed high on the priority for Phase I inspections as provided for in the states Dam Safety Assurance Programs. The preparation of these envelope curves has been initiated and is due to be completed by CWC in the first quarter of 1991. Guidelines for the application of this approach and training to state DSO personnel will be carried out by the Hydrology Organization of CWC. 5. A second stage or intermediate level hydrologic review would be made during the Phase I inspections, especially for those dams showing potential inadequacies on the basis of the previously defined screening process. CWC Hydrology organization will prepare and issue a manual outlining a more detailed procedure for utilizing a unit hydrograph for the catchment area and an approximation of the PMP and the Standard Project Storm (SPS) or other appropriate rainfall values. The manual will cover the computational methodology, commonly used computer programs, and guidelines on making assumptions for infiltration rates, base flow, times of concentration and other relevant factors. 6. While the screening and second stage review provide rough checks on the flood characterization, in each case the result of the flood inflow on the dam, reservoir and spillways must be simulated by making flood routing computations. CWC-DSO will provide written guidelines and standards on assumptions to be made for potential gate malfunction, pre-flood reservoir levels, freeboard, and other relationships for the process of computing the inflow, outflow and storage as the flood is mathematically modeled for being "routed" through the system. 7. Should these two reviews show deficiencies, then a detailed and full level re-evaluation of the flood handling capability of the subject dam(s) and spillway will be performed. The critical element of the detailed review is the determination of the PMP, SPS or otherwise appropriate rainfall amounts to be used in estimating the flood. 8. The present general procedure used in making computations of the PMF for new dams or checking those for critical older structures, is to make a formal request to the India Meteorological Department (IMD) on a project-by-project basis asking for the rainfall values of the design storm or the PMP and its characteristic spatially and over time. For the purpose of re-evaluation of hundreds of dams annually for dam safety analysis, the case by case furnishing of the rainfall data by IMD is impractical. It was decided to have the Dam Safety Project include having IMD prepare regional "charts" or "atlases" that provide the PMP values for use in flood hydrology computations. The atlases will be prepared first for the geographical area of the four rarticipating states and then expanded to cover the entire country of India. The first component will be completed within three years with the total national atlases prepared within four and a half years. - 46 - Annx Page 3 of 4 9. CWC will coordinate the progress and activities of IMD in this effort and a special review committee will be formed by CWC and IMD to monitor and provide general review of the XMD activities and the final product. A similar process with IMD and CWC will produce altases for the Standard Project Storm values over the region including the four participating states. 10. Of the 33 dams identified to require the initial remedial action, only five have been re-evaluated for flood handling adequacy under current Indian standards. A program and schedule has been set out for the hydrology analysis to be nonducted by CWC Hydrology Organization on a case by case basis. The hydrologic adequacy of the dam and spillway is a prerequisite for completing the plans for remedial action unless there are emergency or extremely urgent actions needed structurally that are independent of the spillway. To aid in the training of state hydrology specialists and to assist the CWC Hydrology Organization will arrange for state personnel to be temporarily assigned to CWC headquarters. Table 1 at the end of this annex outlines the schedule of the CWC Hydrology Organization in carring out of flood hydrology analysis. 11. In the later stages of the project after the IMD atlases are complete, it is planned that training sessions for state hydrology personnel would be carried out. The state staff who have by then gained experience from working alongside CWC staff, would prepare their own flood hydrology analysis at the state level. Prior to using the flood hydrographs in analysis for dam and spillway modification, any states hydrology flood computations would be vetted by the CWC- Hydrology Organization. -47- AnDn 4 Paga 4 of 4 GWc - HIYfROL8Y QRGANIZAOTOBRNV SCFL IOR HYflBOLOtITCAL RIEVII~~0'DM tJNDER P~~RAM IOR RHARTLIT N Target Date fgr e6mp1mt£i= 1. Hydrologic review of following dams April 1, 1991 a) Pagara b) Pitlowa c) Kotwal d) Gandhi Sagar e) Periyar f) Kodaganar 2. Hydrologic review of April 1, 1991 Three category C dams in Orissa 3. Completion of hydrologic August 1991 review of Tigra Dam 4. Hydrological review of 4 months after augemented Hiramund Dam staff in position 5. Hydrologic review of Rana 4 months after augmented Pratap Sagar, Jawahar Sagar staff in position and Gandhinagar and Kota Barrage can be addressed spillway decision made. only after decision on Gandhinagar has been taken. 6. Hydrologic reviews of all 4 months after staff is in other dams position Other category B Dams Other Category C Dams After 1993 To be performed by the States To be vetted by CWC - 48 - AnnAxL Page 1 of 5 TNDTA RMDAL WORKS R~abliRhing Prioritia~ or Tnapeation and SeTAntion for Ramedial Antion 1. It is important for the project to assure that the limited resources suitable are utilized in the most effective and efficient manner possible. This requires that attention be directed to those potential problem dams posing the higheat degree of risk. To accomplish this requires the establishment of some sort of screening methodology - albeit not precise - which can be establish a group rank order of some type for pursuing the Phase I inspection, the Phase II evaluations, where necessary, and to select dams requiring remedial work on a logical priority basis. 2. While the most ideal way to establish priorities for initial investigation would be on a nationwide scale, this would become an imponderous and unworkable approach. The states are the only institutions possessing the intimacy needed to evaluate the situation. However, it is also necessary that a degree of uniformity be applied throughout the country. It is, therefore, necessary for CWC to provide to the States, the requisite guidance to aid in prioritizing the work involved with dam safety. 3. As a first order, each state should conduct a hazard classification of all large dams. CWC-DSO should assist with guidelines on how to sub-divide the high hazard potential classification category contained in Table II of the "Guidelines for Safety Inspection of Dams". This is necessary as the bulk of the large dams are high-hazard dams and further delineation into sub-groups is required before prioritizing for Phase I inspections. It ia suggested that the high hazard category be divided into 3 to 4 sub-groups but still based on gradations of potential loss of life and economic loss. Hazard classification should always remain the primary factor for distinguishing an order of priority. Within each of the sub-groups developed, the dams can be further classified and sub-divided by grouping into 3 to 4 sub-categories based on a combination of storage capacity and height of dam. 4. Historically in India and internationally, it has been found that hydrologic deficiencies are one of the most common threat to dam safety. Several factors contribute to this situation: (a) the potential for infrequent events producing extraordinary precipitation had not been considered during design; (b) the determination of such events was hampered by inadequate basic data; (c) and the realization that precipitation forecast for rare events have been approached. To provide a tool for the states to use in further delineation of priorities for Phase I inspections, the CWC will develop parametric envelope curves (order of magnitude curves) for PMF/SPF based on the best available comparative data. These guidelines curves will be ^ 49 - AznnAxS Page 2 of 5 used by the states in making a broad screening for the purpose of identifying potential hydrologic problems and helping to set priorities for which dams to address first. 5. Not related to priority setting for the Phase I inspection, but vital to determining spillway adequacy during the Phase I inspection, is the need for a parametric method of routing the flood and analyzing other aspects which could be used to determine whether a Phase II investigation is required. The approach will be designed to give results which will produce the degree of deviation from the required spillway standard which then can be used to evaluate the priority of Phase II investigations. A guideline manual for this type of quick review should be produced by the CWC-DSO. 6. Since pre-and post-monsoon inspection reports prepared by the O&M units are available for all dams, and in some cases have identified deficiencies or suspected deficiencies, these can be further used to help set the priorities for the Phase I inspection. 7. Taking into account the hazard classification, the potential hydrologic deficiencies and the known physical deficiencies, the State Dam Safety Organization should in the early stages of the project, develop a group order ranking that reflect the risk and thereby establishes the seheclule of priorities for conducting the Phaan I inaection, This by necessity requires the application of composite judgement in the processes. 8. Priority for Phase II investigations is necessarily dependent on the findings of the Phase I inspections. Using the relative degree of deficiency exposed by the Phase I inspection, the SDSO should recommend an order of priority for conducting the Phase II investigation to the State Dam Safety Committee. 9. As a result of the Phase I1 investigation, the problem will be defined to the extent that a remedial solution can be postulated. At this time, it will be necessary to balance the cost of the solution, the severity of the deficiency and the risk involved. This should be done by the SDSO with recommendations to the State Dam Safety Committee who will establish the priorities for designing and undertaking the remaining activities of investigations, designs and contracting to carry out the remedial work. Implemntation of Ramedial Work 10. The primary target of this project is to develop the institutional means and capacity to ensure the establishment and perpetuation of a viable dam safety assurance program in each state. However, there is also support for remedial work on 33 sub-projects which have deficiencies already identified through partial implementation of the program. Inclusion of remedial work in the project will serve as an incentive for the respective states to strengthen their institutions, accelerate inspections, undertake investigations and improve the operational facilities for reacting to threatening floods. Carrying out remedial works will also provide a better perspective to the states of what constitutes a total dam safety assurance program and enable the - so - Page 3 of 5 organization to evaluate the efficacy of the program. It will also enable the staff institutions to evaluate and adjust the procedures for selecting and utilizing the mandatory Dam Safety Review Panels (DSRP). 11. The 33 dams initially identified for remedial action have been categorized by a combination of readiness of investigations, analysis and design as well as critical need for rehabilitation work. The categorization is defined as follows: Category A Dams (7 Dams) - Top priority dams with evaluations and designs nearly complete (Hydrologic reassessments already made) Category B Dams (5 Dams) - Deficiencies identified but investigation and evaluation incomplete. (Hydrologic reassessment not yet made) Category C Dams ( 21 Dams) - Partial deficiencies identified, no significant investigations or designs made. (Hydrologic reassessment not yet made) Category D Dams (undetermined) - Dams yet to be fully inspected and evaluated. Hydrologic reassessment most likely required. Table 1 at the end of this section lists the names of the 33 dams presently identified for remedial works. By year two or three of the project, some of the dams being inspected and evaluated under the expanded activity of the SDSO, may be determined to be more critical in nature than those presently included in the type C category. The states will maintain an active listinig of the categorization of the dams planned to be rehabilitated under the project. This will be reviewed with CWC at each of the bi-annual project management meetings. 12. Table 2 lists the total estimated base costs of the 33 dams by state and by category. These costs are very preliminary because the full extent of the work required has not been determined in detail. Some of the estimates may be conservative in that work estimated at the present time may not ultimately be required. There is also the situation of construction periods needing to be extended over a number of years in cases where normal operation prohibits the remedial activities. 13. The schedule at the end of this annex, illustrates the relative typical time estimated to be required to complete the process of remedial action for a typical dam in category D, B, C, and A. The category D dam would take the longest period due to the time required for initial inspection, evaluations, prioritizations, and eventual design and construction. With over 900 dams in the four states in the category D, only a few will be able to be processed - 51 - Ana 5 Page 4 of 5 within the time-frame of the project. All the dams go through the same general sequence as shown in the implementation schedule. At the start of the project, however, some dams have already been through the basic initial activities, al beit in a less formal manner, but now require a fewer number of actions before being ready for remedial action. 14. In all cases, the proposed remedial work will be reviewed by the newly appointed DSRPs of each state. In some cases, there will be a need for multiple reviews as renewed investigations, modified analysis approaches or revised designs may be required. 15. Following the approval of the sub-project remedial action plans, the state design units of the irrigation department or other owner agencies will indicate the construction packaging and cost estimates for the remedial works. There may be multiple contracts due to the requirements for specialized services. There may also be a combination of force account work by state construction forces and contracted work. These remedial action plans will be brought to the CWC-DSO unit for procedural clearance prior to tendering contracts for construction. This CWC clearance will be a "proforma" type clearance similar to that used by CWC on "medium irrigation projects". The exception to this is in regard to sub-projects where the state engineers have prepared the hydrology evaluations, which must be vetted by the CWC Hydrology Unit. Very few of those cases should occur during the project since the CWC- hydrology unit is scheduled to perform the hydrologic analysis on the remaining of 28 or so dams of the 33 dams in the initial group. 16. The remedial works cost comprise almost 70 percent of the total project- base cost. As there will adjustments in cost estimates of the facilities as the project progresses, there is no pre-project allocation of funds to any individual dam. Each case will be evaluated for implementation as the designs are completed and cleared. 17. Of the 33 dams in the project, Hirakud Dam warrants special mention. The amount included in the estimate (Rs.317.5 million) is based upon the estimated cost to complete sealing the upstream face of the right bank concrete spillway section work which has been started. Historically, the problem of deterioration of the concrete in this dam has been under study for some time; however, a cause for the concrete degradation (in various forms) has not been established. Without understanding the cause, it may not be prudent to undertake a program to repair the visible deficiencies (cracks). This proposed sealing work has not had the benefit of review by a Dam Safety Review Panel. (a) At the time of project appraisal a special panel to evaluate the "cracking" at Hirakud Dam had been formed and held two or three meetings to determine the causes, extent and progression of the concrete cracking. The Government of Orissa in September 1990 requested an international team of experts be formei to assist in assessing the basic cause of the concrete problem and to help devise a comprehensive remedial action plan. GOI is awaiting the results and recommendations of the existing panel evaluating the cracks before taking any further action. - 52 - Annex 5 Page 5 of 5 (b) Considering the suspected distressed condition of the dam, expedited efforts are needed to review the studies made to date, to determine further exploration and investigation needed to assure definition of the problem, to determine propriety of tfis proposed repair at the upstream face and to prescribe a course of action to resolve the problem. Implementation studies and the overall solution should be under the overview of a Dam Safety Review Panel. (c) The development of a comprehensive remedial action plan should be taken before any disbursements are made for Hirakud remedial work under this project. As the cost estimates become available for the total remedial action, there may be a need to consider new and separate project, solely for the rehabilitation of Hirakund Dam. (d) In addition to the observed structural distress, hydrologic reassessment of the design flood has been made for the basin above Hirakud Dam within the last decade. The spillway capacity had been determined to be undersized and some studies were performed on alternative means to upgrade the capability. Since new methods of performing the hydrologic analysis in estimating the design flood, are now in force, an updated estimate of the Probable Maximum Flood will be performed under this project. No cost estimates, however, have been included in this project for spillway modifications. -53 - Annex 5 Attaclgiinent1 INDIA DAM SAFETY PROJECT SEQUENCE OF ACTIVITIES FOR TYPICAL DAM REHABILITATION Elapsed time In yrean 2 1 S 4 a 5 Activities 1 2 3 4 t12I3 4 1l2131411121314 11213 4 12 3 4 TYPIeALCtiEGOn. DAIUU (Average Implmenta-don perIod 5.5 years) (Inspecions yet loDbO eead Zm cn z z z mW ---- ;&Q 22 =z defidendes not identified) TYPICALCAlEGORf CAI (AvMorWe lmplemeintton prod 5.0 yaws) (Partal defildendes Idendfled wifout slgnIfcant I be Az z z m ez s zz .z. E14m m investgaton loepbWd) - I I I I I 1 1 r rYPICALCATEGORY BOAM (Averag Implmmentmalon period 4.5 yes) (Defildendes Identifled but lnvestlons and elua0tns I I 92 ZZZi lM Incomplete) I I T I lI I l TYPICLCATEGORY ADAM (Averae ImpleWmntatIon period 375 yeas (Top prorily with de n & evaluations. Indudinghydreo glc, I I I I 31 I zI nearly complete) Perform dHazd CWsull for al dam In stW|1 Review records and prpost mnoon Inspecon mpor*e Examine Risk and lard PolcntW SPrdiarize dams fr I Collect data for hydroblogi review Conduct Pt e I Inpe_tioIs Conduct hydlogic rwiew In consuaton wilh CVC Establish evaluation tem for Phlse If analysIs Conduct Phase 11 evahiaoans_ Conduct dtaledhyddroogic analysis and tood outing I needed Seleot,sanion andae OSRP _6W Evaluate dlw W prblems and piomtze with D.S.Comn_7tte_ Conduc final fieldnigatinsI Carry out technical analsis and prepare preUlnwy deosgn M Con t flood r aun n prope spwa mdications If ny_ Prnt technkal pprech,nalysis anddegnsa DOSP_ Respond to points andw gestions of DSRP Obtain final approval of DSRP ObtainCOWC cocra d o_xm _d p_ssm _d l l II 1'11m Prepare conw do cw o I M _ _ _ | | | | |Constructon p will vwy Call for and evahSo bkfs. eW a - - end -p - consil145cnderabl fmm cas ame caae-2.5 Con seronWod for ro t worlw8uperles wo* - - - - yes s here as tpcl _ Subnd repol, record nd dM ID SD5 l 1111 U I 77 ____________________ _ _E u__..11 11 11 11 1 . _ _ _IL _ _ … _ 11111111…1 Annex 5 - 54 - Attacbment 2 INDIA DAM SAFPTY PROBJECT Tabnl 1 - Tfat of namn POrOviumlJY Idantified to RanolvA Reedal WnrkRi S1:ate Cataogy Dam Madhya Pradesh A Pagara Pillowa Kotwal Gandhisagar B Tigra C Kaketo Barna Aoda Orissa A Hirakud B None C Dariang Ghodahada Soroda Bhanjanagar Behera Ganianala Jharnai Alikuan Rajasthan A None B Ranapratap Sagar Jawahar Sagar Kota Barrage C Parbati Matri Kundia Alnia Galwa Tamil Nadu A Periyar Kodaganar B Sathanur C Pechiparai Manimuthar Uppar Ponnanlar Gomukhinadhi Vidur - 55 - Annex 5 Attachment 3 DAM -AFETY POJECT Iab1 2 - Rtoimnted Remedial Worka Costa by Category ef Readiness Estimated Construction Cost (in million Rupeas) Category A Dams 775 Category B Dams 378 Category C Dams 794 Category D Dams ad Total 1,947 - 56 - ,Annax 6 Page 1 of 2 D2AM RAFETY PROJRCT 1. The World Bank operating procedures require the formation of a Dam Safety Review Panel (DSRP) for large dams associated with Bank-funded projects. Under this Dam Safety Assurance and Rehabilitation Project, the utilization of DSRPs by each participating state is a vital component of the project. Initially, one DSRP will be formed for each state, yet the workload, complexity of proposed remedial actions and other scheduling factors may require more than one panel in a state. 2. The objective of the DSRP is to provide an independent overview of the reports of distress observed, the investigative analysis performed, and the remedial actions proposed prior to initiation of rehabilitative activities for the dams. The broad experience of the members of DSRP in dam engineering will be applied to assure that appropriate diagnosis of the distress conditions has been made and that the remedial actions proposed by the state are suitable to restore the dam to an acceptable safety status. Care must be exercised by the DSRP to not demand incorporation of minor cosmetic elements, regular maintenance actions or items not relevant to the safety of the dam, yet the examination and evaluation of key elements having a bearing on the dam's safety status must be thorough and backed by sound technical judgement. 3. The DSRP will be evaluating a number of dams at the same time, each of which will be in a different stage of the investigative, design or implementation stage. The DSRP will be also presented information and results of the remedial action construction and will be required to respond to any special technical problems or questions that may arise during that time. 4. CWC and the Bank may attend and observe any of the DSRP meetings. The states will be informed by CWC and the Bank of their intention to attend any particular DSRP meeting. Following the meetings, written comments by CWC or the Bank may be presented where deemed necessary. The states will be obligated to make written responses indicating the actions they have taken on matter so called to their attention. 5. Attachment 1 to this annex summarizes the selection criteria outlined by the World Bank to the participating states. At the time of appraisal the following selections had been made by the respective states and approved by the Bank. - 57 - Page 2 of 2 madhya Pradesh Dr. K. C. Thomas Chairman Mr. K. Madhavan Dam Designs Mr. A. S. Chatrata Dam Construction Mr. T. Kum*ran Das Hydrology Mr. K.C.C. xaju Engineering Geology Orissa Mr. M.G. Padhye Chairman Mr. R. S. Varshney or Mr. K.N. Raju Dam Designs Mr. S. Balasubramanyan or Mr. M. P. Tyagi Dam Construction Dr. Satish Chandra Hydrology Kr. G.S.M. Rao Engineering Geology Rajasthan Mr. Pritam Singh Chairman Mr. S. N. Guru Rao Dam Designs Mr. K.P. Datye Dam Construction Kr. S. M. Seth Hydrology Kr. K. N. Srivastav Engineering Geology Tamil Nadu Mr. G. N. Tandon Chairman Mr. V. A. Parkash Dam Designs Kr. R. RamaswamY Dam Construction Mr. D. P. Ghosh Hydrology Mr. Chalapathy Rao Engineering Geology 6. Attachment 2 to this annex is the Terms of Reference (TOR) covering the activities and actions to be performed by the DSRP, the state, CWC and the Bank for review of existing dams. This TOR has been approved by the Indian National Dam Safety Committee and by the World Bank's India Dam Safety Committee, and will be used to guide the DSRP activities under this project. 7. The DSRP for each state will meet regularly as required to make the necessary reviews of the proposed action-plans for the remedial work under the project. Most commonly more than one individual dam will be addressed at each meetings. 8. The full membership as described in the attached TOR will be maintained during the duration of the project. Members who are unable to continue serving on the DSRPs will be promptly replaced with the replacement member nomination made in coordination with CWC-DSO and then submitted to the Bank for acceptance. - 58 - Annax 6 Atta6nhment 1 Page 1 of 2 Procedures% and Criteri o Select ion and Use of Indapondent Dam Safety Review Panels This note sets out the procedures and criteria to be followed in the establishment and operation of an independent Dam Safety Review Panels (DSRP), for World Bank assisted projects. The attached Terms of Reference (TOR) as applicable will be followed. For dams not covered under any of the attached TORs, modifications may be agreed. 1. Timing When a project with a dam is contemplated to be funded through the World Bank, the DSRP membership should be proposed by the State Governments during the early preparation missions to allow the DSRP to review dam site investigations, designs and implementation programs prior to final World Bank appraisal for funding. World Bank concurrence should be requested in writing from the World Bank staff conducting the project preparation missions. Such requests will be accompanied with the biographical data of the proposed membership. The World Bank concurrence or objection to the proposed DSRP membership and chairman will be made to the States through CWC. The DSRP will continue to function until after construction of the related works and into the operationsl phase. 2. Oualifications and Criteria for Membership of DSRP Proposed DSRP members should have: o Extensive experience in the actual conduct of specific technical work and be recognized as an expert in the particular specialty called for in the TORs. o A positive past work experience record and performance results with excellent standing among peers in the specific field. O Worked a substantial proportion of their career (typically in the order of twenty years) in engineering on dam projects, with at least five years in responsible charge while engaged in problems of the scale and type anticipated to be reviewed. o Not previously worked directly on any project to be reviewed. - 59 - ,hnnnx 6 Attanhment 1 Page 2 of 2 3. DSRP Chairman Special attention should be given in the States selecting and designating the DSRP chairman. In addition to the other membership qualifications, the proposed chairman shall have a broad technical understanding of dam engineering and associated specialties. It is desirable that he has experience in serving on a similar panel for a dam of comparable magnitude, complexity and characteristics. 4. Large or complax Pro ject For very large dams or those with known technical complexities, selection of one or more foreign experts may be required to facilitate the introduction of new technologies and to broaden the DSRP contact with international experts. 5. Short-term E*parts After the DSRP is formed and active, they may select and request the services of short-term experts in accordance with the provisions of the applicable TORs. 6. Sourees of Information on Potential DSRP Members and Short-term Experts The States should seek information from all possible sources in identifying and selecting DSRP member candidates. A list of suitable candidates for DSRP membership and short-term experts in various disciplines will be maintained by CWC for assistance to the States. This list will be regularly reviewed and updated. The World Bank will, upon request, assist in identifying expatriate DSRP candidates or short-term experts in various specialties among experts. 7. Role of Participating Entities during the A-tive Period of the DSRP .t±zatl The state will provide advance project information and data to the DSRP, make arrangements for visits to the site and meetings with the project staff and consultants, if any, and provide other support elements identified in the applicable TORs. The state will subsequently report actions taken in response to DSRP recommendations. CWCo The CWC will participate in DSRP meeting as described in the TOR. It will provide review, monitoring and reporting functions in accordance with the pertinent CWC rules and instruction. World Rank: The World Bank will approve the membership of the DSlu?s. Representatives of the World Bank may attend the DSRP meetings as observers. The World Bank will not otherwise participate in the DSRP review activities - 60 - An;,a 6 Attanhmant 2 Page I of 4 World Bank Aided Projects with Existing Dams exceeding l5m in height or storage volume of 60Mm3 Terms of Reference for Dam Safety Review Panels (The State) (The Project) Responsibility for all matters relating to dam safety during design, construction, and operation rests with the owner, normally the State. A Dam Safety Review Panel (DSRP) provides independent expert review and comment on safety matters to the owner, and to the Bank. The functioning of such a panel, which is advisory, in no way detracts from or substitutes for the expertise, resources, or responsibilities of the owner. The panel's purview is strictly limited to safety matters, and does not extend to financial or economic issues, selection of alternative designs, construction phasing, or any other features of the facilities except where safety is involved. GenAral and Pnoaga 1. In situations where a dam has been designed, constructed, or brought into operation without participation of a DSRP, or in situations where Bank- supported investments depenct upon upstream facilities which have not been subjected to safety review, independent inspections are required. Accordingly, a DSRP shall be established for (the project) by (the state government) to undertake periodic, comprehensive, independent reviews with the objective of evaluating features and actions pertaining to the safety of the dam, and providing recommendations to (the state government) of actions that may be needed to upgrade the dam and appurtenances to acceptable safety standards. The DSRP shall be guided by thq dam safety assurance objectives of the Government of India, (the state government), and related legislation, regulations, standards and guidelines. ganizAtign And MamboRhip 2. The DSRP shall contain a nucleus of members having expertise in the following disciplines: (a) flood hydrology; (b) engineering geology (dam foundations); (c) dam design (concrete, rockfill, earthfill as appropriate); (d) dam construction, engineering and management. There should be four to six members of the DSRP, but all four disciplines should be fully represented. Should the project involve hydropower generation as an integral part of the dam and outlet works, an expert on the design and construction of power plants and appurtenant waterways shall also be included as a member of the DSRP. 3. A Chairman shall be appointed amongst the members by (the state - 61 - Annaxt~f Atanhmnint_ 2 Page 2 of 4 government) to coordinate the communications of the DSRP, to call and chair its meetings, to ensure the membership's objectivity, and to provide balance to its reviews and recommendations. The person responsible for correspondence with the Chairman shall be nominated by (the state government). 4. The flood hydrology member may be released at the discretion of the DSRP. 5. When, in the judgement of the DSRP, additional specific expertise ls required, the Chairman will nominate qualified expert(s) for appointment to the panel to perform special assignments or evaluations on short notice, and report results directly to the panel. The assignments of such experts shall not exceed an aggregate time of ( ) mandays per year; additional time may be allowed subject to direct approval by (the state government) upon written request and justification by the DSRP. Maw inqa 6. The DSRP will meet as frequently as judged necessary by the Chairman to assess the status of (the project) and to present recommendations. 7. DSRP meetings will normally be held at the project site, and attended by all members. Individual inspections of the site, designs, or construction work should occur only under special circumstances, and in such cases the member will send his report of findings to the other panel members for issuance jointly after concurrence by all members. 8. An advance schedule of meetings will be drawn up by the DSRP and (the state government) and sent to the CWC and the World Bank to allow them to send an observer to meetings if they so desire. The Bank will not participate in any manner in the proceedings and discussions. The CWC will directly participate only to the extent that it serves as a consultant and as so requested by (the state government). The CWC, however, may attend the sessions in the course of fulfilling its responsibilities for monitoring the country-wide dam safety program. Specif in Actions 9. The DSRP shall make a general review of the project records and history to become familiar with its operational requirements and their relationship to the facilities. With this background, the specific elements to be reviewed and evaluated by the DSRP shall include, but not be limited to the following: (a) as-built drawings and construction specifications; (b) design records, including geological reports, foundation investigations, materials testing, materials strength parameters and stability analysis; - 62 - Anna AttanhmBn 2 Page 3 of 4 (c) construction records and recent operation and maintenance records, including any instrumentation data; (d) criteria, methodology and determination of the design flood, flood routing studies, and the spillway sizing. Examine spillway operation records, and evaluate the adequacy of spillway sizing: (e) emergency plans including downstream flooding effects, emergency reservoir drawdown, notification of impending dangers to downstream municipal authorities, major flood early warning system, major flood spilling operations plan, and site access during emergencies. 10. The DSRP will carry out a field inspection utilizing a standardized check-list prepared in advance, and note the condition of the elements on the check list and categorize their status as satisfactory, poor, or unsatisfactory. Additional narrative will be provided for poor and unsatisfactory elements. On the basis of these notes and the design review, the DSRP will make a critical evaluation of actions needed to assure the safety of the dam, categorised in regard to urgency. 11. The DSRP may request additional field data including the need for drilling, sampling, laboratory tests, or installation of instruments. - 63 - annWLKri &ttanhnmnt 2 Page 4 of 4 Su2part _ 12. (The state government) shall make the operations and maintenance staff of the dam available to respond to the DSRP's questions at the time of the field inspection. As appropriate, the observations of the operators shall become part of the record of the DSRP's report. (The state government)'s designers a,-- engineering consultants, if any, shall be present during seleoted DSRP meetings. The DSRP will be provided the necessary background information, any relevant data, notes or explanations regarding the designs, computations or methods used. (The state government) 's Chief Engineer for (the project) will coordinate the assembling of such information. The DSRP may suggest additional studies to assist in evaluation of the matters relating to the dam's safety status. 13. (The state government) shall provide clerical, drafting and reproduction services for the preparation of DSRP reports. The GOI and (the state government) shall take necessary actions to allow prompt travel clearance as requested by DSRP members or experts called for the meeting. 14. The report of the meeting will be prepared and signed by all members and presented to (the state government) prior to departure of the members. The report will include: (a) areas of concern, request for additional analysis and recommendations, if any (a) information presented to the DSRP by (the State); (b) issues raised by the State for consideration by the DSRP; (c) actions taken in response to recommendations of the DSRP; (d) actions pending in response to earlier recommendations of the DSRP 15. A copy of the DSRP's report and supplementary information will be transmitted by (the state government) to the CWC, and the World Bank. - 64 - Annax 7 Page 1 of 3 TNnTA DAM SAAETY PRCJCT EXPANST6N OOD FOR A_In N_TWORXS 1. Under the overall 4flood management policy practices, the Central Water Commission (CWC) is playing a significant role in disaster preparedness and mitigation through its country wide network of 157 flood forecasting stations, out of which 25 stations pertain to inflow forecasting into reservoirs. 2. The Dam Safety Project also proposes to upgrade India's flood forecasting capability by improving the data acquisition system for modernizing the inflow forecasting and by attaining better warning time and inflow information. In the first phase of this program river basins such as the Krishna, the Mahanadi and the Chambal which are inter-state basins will be selected for evaluation of real time data acquisition and inflow forecasting using state of the art data transmission systems and mathematical modelling technology. 3. The existing system in the Krishna and the Mahanadi, maintained aad operated by CWC, has a large network of meteorological/hydrological and wireless stations. These stations are yet to be organised into the real time system reducing the manual operation to the minimum. In the case of Chambal basin, the inflow forecasting into the Gandhisagar reservoir is operated and maintained by the Government of Madhya Pradesh with the help of a network of rain gauge/gauge discharge and wireless stations. It is now proposed to modernize these systems by installing real time data acquisition network of stations with advanced sensor technology, micro processor based Data Acquisition System (DAS) coupled with the latest technology of communication. The proposed system would be suitably interfaced with the main computer system in each basin to store, process and interpret the data through mathematical models for issue of real time inflow as well as river level forecasts. 4. The real time stations are called remote stations and are categorized into three groups which include the meteorological stations (MS) to collect data of rainfall and other meteorological parameters, gauge and discharge stations (GD) to collect information on the river level and discharge along with information of silt and water quality at a few selected sites and project stations (PS) at existing structures/projects/gauge sites and also at projects where inflow forecasts are to be issued. It is also proposed to have data of the meteorological parameters not only from the meteorological sites but also from the gauge and dischazge sites and the project sites. The program also envisages modernization of the gauge discharge observation technique by introducing state-of-art technology available in this field. - 65 - nax2 7 Page 2 of 3 5. In the Krishna basin, it is possible to have 109 remote stations out of which 48 will be M.S. stations, 29 GD stations and 32 PS Stations. The main control center in the basin would be located at Hyderabad/Vijayawada alongwith the computer system. The existing CWC network of 27 G&D stations and 31 meteorological stations be merged into the new system. The inflow forecasting activity which is presently done for six reservoirs might be extended to cover two more reservoirs with the proposed network. 6. In the Mahanadi basin, inflow/river level forecasting is presently carried out for the Hirakud reservoir and to river level stations in the Mahanadi delta with the help of 37 GD and gauge stations, and 31 meteorological stations. It is proposed to modernize the forecasting system in the basin with 84 real time remote stations comprising 35 MS Stations, 37 GD Station, 12 PS Stations. The main control center would be located at Sambalpur/Bhubaneswar along with the computer forecasting activity to cover five additional reservoirs and one river level forecasting site. 7. In the Chambal basin, inflow forecasting is done by the Government of Madhya Pradesh (GOMP) with the help of 13 rain gauge and 14 gauge discharge stations for operating of the Gandhisagar Dam and the cascade of two reservoirs and the barrage downstream. This system is proposed to be completely modernized for real time forecasting to improve the performance of operation of the Gandhisagar Dam and other reservoirs for optimum utilization of storage in the reservoirs. In such new network, it is possible to establish 32 remote stations out of which 13 stations would be MS and 13 GD and 4 PS. The main control centre would be located alongwith computer system at Kota/Udaipur. 8. In order to implement, operate and maintain systems proposed above on a real time basis for inflow and river level forecasting, the organizational structure must be evaluated. The technical staff would be fully supplemented with hydro-meteorological, telemetry and wireless and computer specialists. 9. The cost estimates for the organizational proposals will be prepared. The prevailing costs of various equipment and communication systems as available both indigenously and imported will be considered. The operation and the maintenance of the system will be examined. The Tools & Plants (T&P) estimates take into account the equipment including vehicles etc., to be procured both indigenously and imported. Some of the equipment for the project may have to to be imported. The component of study tours and training would be worked out after consultation with the World Bank. 10. The total equipment component in the project would be about 50% foreign exchange. The custom duty at the prevailing rates for different types of equipment to be imported would be fully accounted for in the estimates. 11. Keeping in view the fact that there is already an organization functioning in some basins, there still may be additional technical and administrative staff needed at the start of the project. In the preliminary proposals submitted in May/June, 1990 and which was - 66 - Annex 7 Page 3 of 3 discussed by the pre-appraisal mission of the World Bank, it was envisaged that the project would cover 14 dams amd reservoirs for inflow forecasting. It was also proposed to have either the line of sight telemetry or the satellite telemetry communication system for data acquisition and transmission. Later evaluation considered the advantages of the meteor burst communication and its recommendations for adoption in the Narmada basin for a similar project. It was considered desirable to evaluate the same system for other river basins. The pre-appraisal mission of the World Bank had also desired that the staff proposal should be re-examined. In preparing the revised proposals, the new system to be adopted for the Narmada basin, also under World Bank Assistance, will be kept in view. 13. As desired by the World Bank pre-appraisal mission, and subsequent internal GOI review, the requirement of staff has been examined and it is yet to be decided, the mix of existing organization of CWC and state organizations. - 67 - Annsx i Page 1 of 4 TRATIMNt, WORKSHOPS AMI CO6NSULTANCY 1. The total provision for training, workshops and consultancy in the Dam Safety Project is of the order of Ro.47 million. This contains a provision of Rs.14 million for Central component and Rs.32 milllon for the four participating States. Provisions for workshops and training have been made under separate activities, both Central and State. However, this activity will be centrally managed and coordinated. External consultancy for training will be deployed through CWC only. Cantral ComponAnt 2. The provision under the CWC component of the D8AR Project for training and workshops is as follows: (a) Under the TnA4J4As YLnna1 Rr ahn portion of the Central Component of the DSAR Project, the provision for Training Seminars and Workshops will be about Ra.8.9 millilon. This provision includes: ziam Z~~~~~~~~~~~~at~imatad onmt (in Rs. million) L. Training of CWC engineers abroad 30 man-months (15 DSO + 15 Hydrology) 2.0 Li. Conducting Training Courses, Seminars and Workshops 2.1 iii. External Consultants 12 man-months (6 DSO + 6 Hydrology) 4.0 iv. Study Tours 8 man-months (4 DSO + 4 Hydrology) Li Sub Total 8.9 (b) Under &mtin *g ant i%L. a provision of RAE.6n milLiLn had been made towards training and external consultancy. Details are yet to be finalised. Total - Rs.14.9 million - 68 - Annex A Page 2 of 4 state component 3. The provision under State Component of the DSAR Project for training and workshop is as follows: AcivtltAtA Amount in Rs. million (a) Training and Workshops 6.0 (b) Panel of Experts for Phase 1I inspection 10.4 (c) Consultants for Hydrological and Structural Reviews 7.7 (d) Experts for Dam Safety Review Panels 1_E Total 31.7 Training and Workahop 4. A provision of Rs.4.0 million has been made for deputing two engUinra3r from each of the four participating states for one-and-a-half monthal training abroad every year. This is equivalent to 60 man-months of training for state engineers over the project period. A provision of Rs.2.0 million has been made for workshops to be arranged for the four participating states. Though the provision has been split into four statewise estimates it is proposed to hold joint workshops. These workshops would be conducted twice in a year, generally in May and November. Thus, there would be ten workshops during the project period. 5. Workshops in October 1991 and October 1992 would be for procedures, methods and techniques for performing safety inspection of dams. These workshops would be of two weeks' duration and would be conducted by CWC and State engineers. Other workshops would also be conducted by Indian experts/CWC/States and would cover subjects like hydrology, operation and maintenance, periodic inspections, emergency action planning, structural aspects, dam safety procedures, instrumentation, correcting dam safety deficiencies, etc. IndAn RMXnr+m/CanaUltA= 6. Indian experts/consultants would be engaged for the following: (i) Augmentation of teams for Phase II evaluations; (ii) Consultants for hydrological and structural analysis; and (iii) Dam Safety Review Panels. - 69 - Aa* Page 3 of 4 z5=rt; far Phase I T 7. Where Phase I inspection indicates need for further investigations, the Phase II evaluation would be carried out by state engineering staff augmented with experts. The phase TI evaluation team would consist of one to four members. Assuming five visits of the team of three days each, the requirement would be 60 man-dayn ELxr d-m. Provision has been made for Phase II inspections as under: state Numb&i- f Damn 3nt i" t "d '''' " (in Re. million) 1. Madhya Pradesh 75 5.3 2. Orissa 25 1.8 3. Rajasthan 25 1.8 4. Tamil Nadu 21 .A Total 142. ln Cnanultants for Hvdrolooieal ani rtura1 Imv 8. Provisions are included for technical assitance to the states in structural review by utilizing consultants: Hydrological Structural Total Cost slat& Review Revziw (in Re. millions) Madhya Pradesh 95 dams 20 dams 28.75 2.9 Orissa 20 dams - 7.00 .7 Rajasthan 50 dams 24 dams 37.00 3.7 Tamil Nadu 5 dAm - AM9l0 .1 Total 7 i D_a RafgtX Review Pangla 9. As per requirement of the World Bank, Dam Safety Review Panels are required to be established for dams where remedial measures are proposed to be undertaken. The DSRP would consist of four to five experts. It ls estimated that the DRSPs would spend abut 240 man-days for each project. 10. The number of dams proposed for rehabilitation in this project and the project provisions are as under: - 70 - Annex A Page 4 of 4 Number of Dame Provision for Stat-A ~~PrnpoRad fcrRhSiiat1n DP (in Ra-Milionl Madhya Pradesh 8 1.7 Orisaa 9 2.2 Rajasthan 7 1.5 Tamil Nadu .1 Total L .2. 71 - Annex 8 Attachment I INDIA DAM SAFETY PROJECT SCHEDULE FOR TRAINING, WORKSHOPS, SEMINARS AND CWC.CONSULTANCIES 1091 1992 _ 993 1 0994 1 1995 Activity 1 2131411 23 4112 31412S314 1 21314 TRAINING-INDIAN ENGINEERS ABROAD CWC STAFF-30 man month STATE STAFF40 man morth STUDY TOURS ABROAD a tours _ _ U U WORKSHOPS 10 of two weeks duratlon each _ TRAINING COURSES BY CWC FOR STATE 4 of two weeks each 9 M SEMINARS 3 of two weeks each _ _ _ EXTERNATL CONSULTANCY Dam Break Analyslsb3 man mo. Risk Analysis-3man mo. Flood Gate Operatlon Slmulatlon-3 man mo. Mlscellaneous-3 man mo. ___ _____- -_- _ __ _- __ _ _ - 72 - Annex 9 Page 1 of 2 DlAM SAKYPRJC RNVIRONMANTAL IMPACT 1. The initiation and intensification of the Dam Safety Assurance procedures and the performance of remedial action cannot provide an absolute guarantee that there will be no dam failures within the four participating states. The hazArdsa that a dam with a full reservoir pose to inhabitants downstream is most likely to increase in the future as there will be greater populations, more valuable property and other near river bank development that would cause higher stages of flow should a dam fail. The x±ak associated with dam failure should however be significantly reduced as a result of implementing the project. The increased knowledge of the safety status of the dams by more detailed monitoring and inspection, followed by remedial work to correct deficiencies will over time reduce the risks of failure. 2. The failure of a large dam, particularly one located above densely populated areas as is typical in India, poses an enormous environmental hazard as well as the hazard of loss of life and property. The environmental impact of the project must be considered positive as the primary objective is to upgrade and maintain a higher level of safety of the dams against failure and thus reduce the risks to the public. 3. During the course of carrying out the remedial work on individual sub- project dams, there may be limited positive and negative impacts. For example, the reassessment of the spillway capacity may require the raising of the dam level to accommodate larger than designed for floods. This could cause a negative impact on areas around the reservoir shore-line. Those areas would become subject to inundation during extreme flood events. (Such floods might only be of a return interval of say one in one thousand years and thus only have a slight probability of actually occurring during the life of the project). The same action would however also provide a larger flood storaqe - 73 - nnax 9 Page 2 of 2 capacity that would create positive environmental impacts by allowing greater regulation of large but not extreme floods and reduce the peak flows downstream. 4. The construction work for the basin facilities and for remedial work will largely be confined to the areas immediately in the vicinity of the existing dams. As an example, a contract that requires a foundation grouting or construction of a drain from the toe of the dam will have practically no environmental impact. on the other hand, larger remedial activities such as creating a new acccss road, or opening a quarry for additional materials to expand a dam, could have some negative impact during the construction period. The environmental impact of such activities is obviously extremely site specific. 5. The states have made a commitment to conduct an inventory of environmental impact potentials as an activity of the sub-project design. Where necessary, an environmental impact analysis will be prepared to assess the extent of any negative impacts and to outline means of mediation. Such environmental impact analysis would be carried out under a terms of reference acceptable to the Bank. 6. Another project activity with a positive environmental impact, is the expansion of guidelines and requirements for each dam to have an emergency action plan. Such plans commonly relate to procedures and instruction for communication and notification. Procedures to warn downstream Civil Defense Authorities in case of large and sudden flood flow releases or for situations where failure of the dam appears eminent. The emergency action plans will be prepared in cooperation with local and state officials and periodically updated to assure that they remain active. The SDSO in each atate will help guide the individual project O&M units in preparing such plans and in checking that the information is prominently posted for reference by the dam's operating personnel. - 74 - A,o 10 Page 1 of 2 Dam RAFRTY PRO.1ReT NONITTORING AND RVALUATYTON 1. Monitoring and Evaluation (MQs) are intrinsic parts of the project. The project will establish institutional resources and procedures to monitor on a regular basis the safety status of dams in the participating states, and evaluate and take action upon the information so generated. 2. In addition, the functioning of the project and extent to which it is meeting the targets establish under India's dam safety assurance procedures would be the subject of specific M&E activities. MQnitnring 3. Within each state, the State Dam Safety Organization would prepare an annual report on its activities, and the findings of inspections carried out during the year. This report would c( tamn the following statistical information : (a) number of functioning large dams in state at the end of the year; (b) number of Phase I inspections (i) planned for the year: (ii) started during the year: (iii) completed: (c) number of Phase II evaluations (i) recommended by State Dam Safety Committee during the year; (Li) pending or in progress at the beginning of the year; (iii) completed during the year: (iv) pending at the end of the year; (d) agencies and manpower assigned to ongoing Phase II inspections; (e) number of flood hydrology review and who is performing them: - 75 - annwI Page 2 of 2 (i) requested during the year; (ii) pending or in progress at the beginning of the year: (iii) completed during the year; (iv) pending at the end of the year; (f) breakdown by cause of referrals for Phase II inspection(hydrology, abutments,foundations, etc.) 4. This information provides the basic information for monitoring whether dam safety assurance activities are proceeding according to schedule, or are falling behEnd. On the basis of this infonlation, the CWC prepares its Annual Report on the project. Evaluation 5. Evaluation of the program would be carried out annually by a sub- committee of the National Committee on Dam Safety together with designated members of each participating state's Dam Safety Committee. 6. The purpose of evaluation is to assess whether the objectives of the Dam Safety Assurance program are being met: the scheduled inspections and reports are a means to improve the safety status of dams, not an end in themselves. 7. The Terms of Reference for the evaluation process would be in two parts: first, an analysis of any factors causing a shortfall in the schedule for completion of Phase I inspection for Phase II investigations. (staff, facilities, non-availability of information, slow response from state, central or other agencies, etc.) State agencies would be encouraged to provide information for this review, and recommend changes to the procedures, agencies involved, and resources provided as appropriate. 8. The second aspect of the evaluation process would focus on the results of inspections, and would include such aspects as: percentage of dams requiring Phase II inspections (categorized by age, type, reason); percentage of "problem" dams being dealt with as a first, and percentage left pending due to lower priority, shortage of funds etc. More detailed analysis of causes of problems would be undertaken to ascertain particular weaknesses in design, materials analysis or other factors which can be related to ongoing and future designs to limit further problems. India Daom Safety Project Table 1. Madhya Pradesh - Institutional Strengthening Detl led Cost Table RS. M Base Costs Parameters 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/9S 96/96 96/97 Total Phy. Cont. For. Exch. Gross Tax Sum. Acnt. r. INVESTMENT COSTS A. Office Furniture 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.10 0.60 0.02 EQ B. Vehicles 0.3 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.10 0.60 0.02 EQ C. Equipmnt O.S 2.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 S.S 0.10 0.60 0.02 Eq D. Consultants 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 4.8 0.10 0.20 0.00 TTC E. Training O.S 0.5 0.5 O.S 0.5 0.5 3.0 0.10 0.20 0.00 TTC Total IWESTMENT COSTS 2.4 4.3 4.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 14.9 II. RECURRENT COSTS A. Incrmental Staff 3.0 4.0 5.6 S.6 S.6 4.0 27.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 IS B. Incremntal Oper. Exp. O.S 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 3.9 0.00 O.OS 0.00 IOE Total RECURRENT COSTS 3.5 4.6 6.3 6.3 6.3 4.7 31.7 Total 5.9 8.9 10.6 7.8 7.6 8.0 46.6 - Values scaled by 100000I.0 4/18/1991 9:29 - Values scaled by 1000000.0 4/18/1991 9:29 I'.3 *-'X ON India Dm Safety Project Table 2. Iadhys Pradesh - Basic Safety Facilities Detailed Cost Table RS. M Base Costs Paraeters 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/96 9S/98 98/97 Total Phy. Coot. For. Exch. Cross Tax Sum. Acot. I. INESTMEIT COS A. Acces Roads 23.6 23.6 22.S 21.4 21.4 15.0 127.5 0.20 0.08 0.02 CW 8. Comunication System 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 0.0 7.5 0.10 0.60 0.02 EQ C. Oisel Generator Sets 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 6.2 0.10 0.60 0.02 EQ 9. Instrumnts 6.2 6.2 4.9 4.7 4.7 3.0 27.7 0.10 0.60 0.02 EQ E. Emergency Stock Piles 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 2.3 0.10 0.60 0.02 EQ F. Supervision I Admin. 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 2.5 0.10 0.05 0.00 DSA G. Land 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.05 0.00 0.00 LA Total INVESTMEN COSTS 32.7 32.7 30.9 29.2 29.2 19.6 174.3 II. RECURRENT COSTS A. Incremental Oper. Exp. 3.6 3.6 3.8 3.6 3.6 3.0 21.0 0.00 0.05 0.00 IOE S Total RECURRENT COSTS 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.0 21.0 -.1 Total 36.3 36.3 34.6 32.8 32.8 22.6 195.3 - Values scaled by 1000000.0 4/18/1991 9:29 I..E '-a, tD India Dam Safety Project Table S. Uadhra Pradesh - Remedial Works Detai led Cost Tablo RS. II Base Costs Parameters 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/96 95/96 96/97 Total Phy. Cont. For. Exch. Cross Tax Sum. Acnt. I. DNVESTMENT COSTS A. Civil Works - Dams 50.9 112.8 139.6 135.4 100.5 83.0 624.2 0.20 0.06 0.02 CW B. Supervision A Ackin. 4.8 10.7 13.3 12.9 9.6 8.1 69.3 0.10 0.05 0.00 DSA C. Design 2.0 4.5 5.6 5.4 4.0 3.4 25.0 0.10 0.05 0.00 OSA 9. Consultants 1.4 1.4 1.4 0.6 0.5 0.5 5.7 0.10 0.20 0.00 TTC E. Dam Safety Review Panel 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.2 0.2 1.9 0.10 0.20 0.00 TTC Total INVESENT COSTS 59.6 129.9 100.2 154.6 114.7 97.2 716.1 Total 59.6 129.9 160.2 1S4.6 114.7 97.2 716.1 - Values scaled by 1000000.0 4/18/1991 9:30 -J a India Dam Sat.tf Projeet Table 4. Orissa - Institutional Strengthening Dtald Cost Table RS. U seew Coa Paramters 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/95 96/96 96/97 Total Phy. Cont. For. Exch. Gross Tax Sum. Aent. I. DNESIENT COSTS A. Office Furniture 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.10 0.60 0.02 EQ B. Vehicles 0.6 0.6 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.10 0.60 0. 02 EQ C. Equipmnt 0.5 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.10 0.60 0.02 EQ D. Consultants 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 4.8 0.10 0.20 0.00 TTC E. Training 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 3.0 0.10 0.20 0.00 TTC Total DNESTMENT COSTS 2.6 3.8 4.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 14.6 II. RECURREIT COSTS A. Incremental Staff 2.7 3.6 4.3 4.3 4.3 3.5 22.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 IS B. Incremental Opor. Exp. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.8 0.00 0.05 0.00 IOE Total REOJRRENT COSTS 2.8 3.7 4.4 4.4 4.4 3.6 23.5 S Total 5.4 7.6 8.7 5.7 6.7 4.9 38.1 - Values scaled by 1000000.0 4/18/1991 9:30 giI India Dm Safety Project Tabl- 5. Orissa - Basic Safety Facilities Detailed Cost Table RS. M ase Costs Paramtors 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/95 95/98 96/97 Total Phy. Cont. For. Exch. Gross Tax Sum. Acnt. I. DIVESTIENT COSTS A. Approach Roads 10.4 10.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.0 34.0 0.20 0.08 0.02 CW B. Wireless Camunication 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.6 0.10 0.80 0.02 EQ C. Standby Poer 3.3 3.3 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.5 10.4 0.10 0.80 0.02 EQ D. Instrumentation 2.6 2.5 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 8.0 0.10 0.80 0.02 EQ E. Flood Forecasting/Warning 5.0 5.0 1.6 1.8 1.6 0.0 14.8 0.10 0.80 0.02 EQ F. Supervision A Admin. 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 1.6 0.10 0.05 0.00 DSA G. Land 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.05 0.00 0.00 LA Total INVEISTMET COSTS 22.3 22.3 7.4 7.3 7.3 4.3 70.9 II. RECMtNrdf COSTS A. Incremental Oper. Exp. 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 29.0 0.00 0.05 0.00 IOE OD Total REOIT COSTS 5.0 5.0 4.0 29.0 Totel 27.3 27.3 12.4 12.3 12.3 8.3 99.9 - Values scaled by 1000000.0 4/18/1991 9:30 IX India DaM Satety Project Table 6. Orissa - Remedial Works Detailed Cost Table RS. U Base Cost Parameters 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/9S 9S/96 96/97 Total Phy. Coat. For. Exch. Gross Tax Sum. Acnt. I. DINESIT COSTS A. Civil Works - Dams 26.8 47.2 151.0 150.0 150.0 98.8 623.8 0.20 0.06 0.02 CW 8. Supervision A Admin. 2.S 4.5 14.3 14.2 14.2 9.4 59.3 0.10 0.05 0.00 OSA C. Design 1.1 1.9 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 25.0 0.10 0.05 0.00 OSA D. ConsuItants 3.0 1.8 1.8 1.0 0.5 0.5 8.6 0.10 0.20 0.00 TTC E. Dam Safety Reiew Panel 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 2.4 0.10 0.2C' 0.00 TTC Total INVESTMEiT COSTS 83.9 55.9 173.6 171.7 171.0 112.9 719.0 Total 3.9 55.9 173.6 171.7 171.0 112.9 719.0 - Values scaled by 1000000.0 4/18/1991 9:30 I- rn, India Dan Safety Project Table 7. Tau;lnadu - Institutional Strengthening Detiled Cost Table RS. U Base Cost* Paretrs 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/96 96/96 96/97 Total Phy. Cont. For. Exch. Gross Tax Sum. Acnt. I. DNVESTIENT COSTS A. Office Furniture 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.10 0.60 0.02 EQ S. Vehicles 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.10 0.80 0.02 EQ C. Equipment 0.8 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.10 0.60 0.02 EQ D. Consultants 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 4.8 0.10 0.20 0.00 TTC E. Training 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 3.0 0.10 0.20 0.00 TTC Total INVESTUENT COSTS 2.3 4.1 3.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 13.7 II. RECUREfNT COSTS A. Incremental Staff 2.0 2.7 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.0 17.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 IS B. Incrmernital Oper. Exp. 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.5 3.2 0.00 0.0 0.00 IOE Total RECURfNT cCOSTS 2.4 3.2 4.0 4.0 4.0 3. 21.1 D Total 4.7 7.3 7.3 5.3 5.3 4.8 34.8 - Values scaled by 1000000.0 4/18/1991 9:30 .4W 0 a SMX India DM Safety Project Ttble 8. TaiIlnadu - BOic Safety Fcilitties Detai led Cost Table RS. 1 Be Cost Parameters 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/95 96/96 96/97 Total Phy. Cont. For. Exch. Gross Tax Sum. Aent. I. IWESTENT COSTS A. Road, Co_n., Powr 7.0 8.3 7.0 1.2 1.2 1.0 25.7 0.20 0.06 0.02 Cw B. Iustnmsntaoo 2.0 3.0 2.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 8.4 0.10 0.60 0.02 EQ C. Flood Forecasting/Wrning 2.0 8.5 3.5 0.5 0.6 0.0 10.0 0.10 0.60 0.02 Eq D. Supervision I Admin. 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 1.5 0.10 0.05 0.00 DSA E. Land 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.05 0.00 0.00 LA Total INVESTIMNT COSTS 11 8 16.4 13.0 2.3 2.2 1.5 48.0 II. RECURRIOT COSTS A. Incremental Oper. Esp. 2.6 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.0 14.9 0.00 0.06 0.00 IOE Total RECURRE COSTS 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.0 14.9 = = -. _- = = - Total 14.2 18.0 15.6 4.9 4.8 3.5 60.9 Values scaled by -000000.0 4/19/1991 9:30 - Value scle hi 1000000.0 4/19/1991 9:80 India De Safety Project Table 9. Tmilnadu - Rmdial Works Detiled Co t Table RS. H Bse coat. Paranmters 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/95 9S/96 #6/97 Total Phy. Cont. For. Exch. Gross Tax Sum. Acnt. I. DYESlIENT COSTS A. Civi Works - Dam 21.3 47.8 74.8 72.6 65.4 62.2 334.1 0.20 0.08 0.02 Ca 8. Supervision & Adin. 2.k 4.6 7.1 6.9 6.2 6.0 31.7 0.10 0.05 0.00 DSA C. Design 0.9 1.9 8.0 2.9 2.6 2.1 13.4 0.10 0.00 0.00 DSA D. Consultants 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 6.0 0.10 0.20 0.00 TTC E. Dam Safety Review Panel 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 2.4 0.10 0.20 0.00 TTC Total IEMSTMEIT COSTS 25.7 55.8 86.3 83.8 76.5 60.4 387.6 = -= -__ Total 26.7 56.8 86.8 63.8 71.5 60.4 387.6 - Valu1 scaled by 1000000.0 4/18/1991 9:30 India Dxn Safety Project Table 10. Rajasthan - Institutional Strengthening Detailed Cost Table RS. u Base Cosit Parameters 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 Total Phy. Cont. For. Exch. Gross Tax Sun. Acnt. I. DNBEST( COSTS A. Office Furniture 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.10 0o0. 0.02 EQ S. Vehicles 0.2 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.10 0.60 0.02 EQ C. Equipment 0.5 2.0 8.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.10 0.60 0.02 EQ D. Consultants 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 4.8 0.10 0.20 0.00 TTC E. Training 0.o 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 3.0 0.10 0.20 0.00 TTC Total DNVES1MET COSTS 2.3 4.3 4.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 14.9 I. RECURRENT COSTS A. Incremental Staff 2.3 3.1 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.5 20.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 IS B. Incremental Oper. Exp. 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 5.4 0.00 0.06 0.00 IOE Total RECURRENT COSTS 3 2 4.0 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 26 0 0D LA Total 6.5 8.3 9.2 8.1 6.1 5.6 40.9 - Values sca.i'd by 1000000.0 4/18/1991 9:30 India Dam Safety Project Table 11. Rajasthan - Basic Safety Facilities Detiled Cost Table RS. U Base Costs Parameters 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/95 9S/96 96/97 Total Phy. Cont. For. Exch. Cross Tax Som. Acat. 1. INWESTMENT COSTS A. Obser. A Measuring Points 1.6 S.S 2.6 0.7 0.7 0.5 11.S 0.10 0.60 0.02 EQ B. Access Road. 2.2 7.8 3.7 0.9 0.9 0.7 16.2 0.20 0.08 0.02 CW C. Bridges A Calverts 0.9 3.1 1.5 0.4 0.4 0.1 6.4 0.20 0.08 0.02 CW 0. Wireless Co_munication 0.8 3.0 1.4 0.4 0.4 0.1 6.1 0.10 0.60 0.02 EQ E. Standby Power 0.4 1.3 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.9 0.10 0.60 0.02 EQ F. Flood Forecasting System 1.9 6.8 3.2 0.8 0.8 0.0 13.S 0.10 0.60 0.02 EQ C. Supervision & Admin. 0.4 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 2.0 0.10 O.OS 0.00 OSA H. Land 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.05 0.00 0.00 LA Total INIESTMENT COSTS 8.3 28.6 13.4 3.8 3.5 1.7 59.0 I. RECURRENT COSTS ______________* _ 3 A. Incremental Oper. Exp. 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 23.S 0.00 0.05 0.00 IOE a Total RECURRENT COSTS 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 23.6 Total 12.3 32.5 17.4 7.6 7.6 6.2 82.6 - Values scaled by 1000000.0 4/18/1991 9:30 Indio Dam Safety Project Table 12. Rajaathan - R d ial Works Detk led Cost Table RS. U Bae Costs Paramoers 91/92 92/98 93/94 94/9S 96/96 9S/97 Total Phy. Cont. For. Exch. Gross Tax Sum. Acnt. I. DVESIWIT COSTS A. Civil Works - Daos 12.2 28.7 90.4 100.4 99.6 61.0 8M2.2 0.20 0.06 0.02 CW S. Supervision & Admn. 1.2 2.7 6.6 9.5 9.6 6.8 87.8 0.10 0.06 0.00 DSA C. Design 0.6 1.1 3.6 4.0 4.0 2.4 15.7 0.10 0.06 0.00 OSA D. Consultants 2.1 2.1 7.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 14.2 0.10 0.20 0.00 TTC E. Dan Safety Review Panel 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 1.8 0.10 0.20 0.00 TTC Total DINESTMENT COSTS 16.3 8.1 109.9 115.3 114.1 70.4 461.1 =====_e= Total 16.3 85.1 109.9 115.8 114.1 70.4 461.1 - Values scaled by 1000000.0 4/16/1991 9:30 I 0 IX India DM Safety Prjact Table 13. Dow Safety Organization Detailed Cost Table RS. M Bass Coo" Paramters 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/96 9S/96 96/97 Total Phy. Cont. For. Exch. Cross Tax Sum. Acnt. I. IKESIWIT COSTS A. Equipment 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.10 0.60 0.02 EQ B. Furnitur 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.10 0.60 0.02 EQ C. Training 0.9 1.1 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2 3.4 0.10 0.20 0.00 TTC Total DhWESTENT COSTS 1.7 1.5 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2 4.6 II. RECURRENT COSTS A. Incre mtl Staff 1.6 2.0 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.3 14.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 IS B. Incremental Oper. Exp. 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 O.S 3.2 0.00 0.0S 0.00 IOE Total RECURRENT COSTS 2.0 2.S 3.3 3.3 3.3 2.8 17.2 Total 3.7 4.0 3.9 3.6 3.5 3.0 21.8 c - Value scaled by 1000.0 4/18/1991 9:30 WI.. India am Safety Project Table 14. Hydrology Organization D teiled Coot Table RS. U _S Cost Parameters 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/96 96/96 96/97 Total Phy. Coat. For. Exch. Cross Tax Sm. Acnt. I. 1NVESTT M trCOS A. Equipment 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.10 0.60 0.02 EQ B. Furniture 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,2 0.10 0.60 0.02 EQ C. Training 1.3 1.6 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.2 4.6 0.10 0.20 0.00 TTC D. PP Charts by IU 2.6 2.6 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.5 0.10 0.20 0.00 TTC E. Consultants 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.0 0.8 5.3 0.10 0.20 0.00 TTC Total DIrESTMENT COSTS 6.4 5.5 4.2 1.4 1.2 1.0 18.8 II. RECDRENT COSTS A. Incremental Staff 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.1 2.1 1.8 11.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 IS B. Incremental Oper. Esp. 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 2.1 0.00 0.0 0.00 IOE Total RECURENT COSTS 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.0 13.8 o6 Total 7.5 7.8 6.8 3.8 3.8 3.0 32.4 1 - Values scaled by 10000C0.0 4/18/1991 9:30 IIW India Dam Safety Project Table 15. Flood Forecasting System Detailed Cost Table RS. U Base Costs Parameters 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 Total Phy. Cont. For. Exch. Cross Tax Sum. Acnt. I. INVESTMENT COSTS A. Civil Works 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 12.0 0.20 0.08 0.02 CW S. Land 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.S 0.05 0.00 0.00 LA C. Furniture & Office Equip. 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.10 0.90 0.02 EQ D. Field Equipment 0.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 10.0 0.10 0.60 0.10 EQ E. Boats A Vehicles 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.10 0.60 0.02 EQ F. Main Data Comm. Equipment 10.0 13.0 15.0 22.0 29.8 22.0 111.8 0.10 0.50 0.50 EQ C. Training 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 5.5 0.10 0.20 0.00 TTC H. Supervision A Admins. 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 3.4 0.10 0.05 0.00 DSA _____ ____ ----_ -__ ------ ------ ----_____ --- Total INWESTMENT COSTS 11.0 22.0 26.7 29.7 35.8 23.0 148.2 II. RECURRENT COSTS A. Incremental Staff 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 4.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 IS 'a B. Incremental Oper. Exp. 0.0 0.0 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 8.4 0.00 0.05 0.00 IOE Total RECURRENT COSTS 0.0 0.0 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 12.8 Total 11.0 22.0 29.9 32.9 39.0 26.2 161.0 - Values scalod by 1000000.0 4/18/1991 9:30 IW X~4 rndia Des Safety Project Project Cost Summary RS. M US3 m X Total _-_--_------------------------ --------------------------- X Foreign Base Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total Exchange Costs A. GOI/CWC Actiwities 1. Institutional Strenghten. 48.2 8.0 S4.2 2.7 0.3 3.0 11.0 1.7 2. Flood Forecasting Systems 93.7 67.2 161.0 5.2 3.7 8.9 41.8 5.2 Sub-Total 141.9 73.2 215.2 7.9 4.1 12.0 34.0 6.9 B. States Instit. Strength. 1. Madhys Pradesh 40.6 f.0 46.6 2.3 0.3 2.6 12.9 1.S 2. Oeiss 32.4 5.7 38.1 1.8 0.3 2.1 14.9 1.2 3. Rajasthan 34.8 6.1 40.9 1.9 0.3 2.3 14.9 1.3 4. TaNil Nadu 29.5 5.3 34.8 1.6 0.3 1.9 16.1 1.2 Sub-Total 137.4 23.0 180.4 7.6 1.3 8.9 14.4 5.2 C. States Basic Safety Fac. 1. Madhya Pradesh 157.7 37.6 195.3 8.8 2.1 10.8 19.2 6.3 2. Oriss 74.8 25.1 99.9 4.2 1.4 5.5 26.2 3.2 3. Rajasthan 59.0 23.5 82.5 3.3 1.3 4.6 28.5 2.7 4. Tamil Nadu 47.0 13.9 60.9 2.8 0.8 3.4 22.9 2.0 Sub-Total 338.5 100.1 438.6 18.8 5.6 24.4 22.8 14.2 0. States Remedial Works 1. Madhya Pradesh 860.4 55.7 718.1 36.7 3.1 39.8 7.8 23.1 2. Orissa 862.7 56.3 719.0 38.8 3.1 39.9 7.8 23.2 3. Rajasthn 423.9 37.2 461.1 23.6 2.1 25.8 8.1 14.9 4. Tamil Nadu 357.8 30.0 387.6 19.9 1.7 21.6 7.7 12.5 Sub-Total 2104.6 179.2 2283.9 118.9 10.0 126.9 7.8 73.7 Total BASELINE COSTS 2722.4 375.6 3098.0 161.2 20.9 172.1 12.1 100.0 Physical Contingencies 451.3 54.6 505.8 26.1 3.0 28.1 10.8 16.3 Price Contingencies 778.7 177.3 958.1 -5.9 2.5 -3.4 0.0 0.0 Total PROJECTS COSTS 3952.4 607.5 4S59.9 170.4 26.4 196.8 13.4 114.3 _ _____________________________________--__--_------------------------------______________________________ Values Scaled by 1000000.0 - 4/18/1991 9:31 a':- India Dam Safety Project Summary Accounts Cost Summary RS.m SU U U Total - ---- ------------------------ --------------------------- X Foreign Base Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total Exchange Costs I. WIVESTMONT COSTS A. CiviI Works 2020.4 175.7 2198.1 112.2 9.8 122.0 8.0 70.9 S. Equipmnt 126.4 160.8 288.2 7.0 8.9 15.9 56.2 9.2 C. Land Acquisition 3.4 0.0 3.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0. Training, TA, Consultants 80.4 20.1 100.5 4.5 1.1 5.6 20.0 3.2 E. Design, Supervis.& Admin. 264.3 13.2 277.5 14.7 0.7 15.4 4.8 9.0 Total INVESTMENT COSTS 2493.9 360.8 2863.7 138.5 20.5 159.1 12.9 92.4 II. RECURRENT COSTS A. Incremntal Staff 118.9 0.0 118.9 6.6 0.0 6.8 0.0 3.8 B. Incremental Oper. Exp. 109.7 5.8 115.4 8.1 0.3 6.4 5.0 3.7 Total RECARRENT COSTS 228.8 5.8 234.3 12.7 0.3 13.0 2.5 7.6 Total BASELDE COSTS 2722.4 375.6 3098.0 151.2 20.9 172.1 12.1 100.0 I Physical Contingencies 451.3 S4.6 505.8 25.1 3.0 28.1 10.8 16.3 D Price Contingencies 778.7 177.3 956.1 -5.9 2.5 -3.4 0.0 0.0 ___ - ------ ----- - ________ - ---------------- _____ ---------- - - _ ____________I Total PROJECTS COSTS 3952.4 607.6 4559.9 170.4 26.4 196.8 13.4 114.3 Values Scaled by 1000000.0 - 4/18/1991 9:31 ,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ D X Om. Safety Project S_msry Accot by Projet Coepoenet RS. U 11 Fl.4 Institutional Basic Safety Remedias Friies iratitutrvghein -Facilities Works Ccetingmiee Cotetlameim. S5reeglit le9 Ma6ya RejaaU.a T_ I Udllye i Rojeesta T_al I ad,ya ftej4tbJ Tmil on. System P,edeh Orius a Node Pradesh Ore,i n Nado Pradeab oriss a Ned* Totl s _ s 7. iMESSltT CrOSS A. Ca,ivi wer 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 127.5 34.0 22.6 2S.? 624.2 23. M92.2 334.1 2196.1 20.0 439.2 31.4 _t. S. Eqiment 2.6 125.6 7.1 0.8 7.1 8.9 43.7 34.6 34.0 18.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 236.2 10.0 23.6 W7.6 18.1 C. Laud Acqleatioe 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 S.0 0.2 10.4 0.4 *. Treleg, TA. Consultants 20.8 6.s 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 11.0 16.0 8.4 100.6 10.0 10.0 24.6 14.7 E. Sig. Se lsa.& Adeil. 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 1.6 2.0 1.6 u4.a 64.2 52.9 43.1 277.5 10.0 27.8 28.4 73.9 To%*e UW T CosTS 22.4 14a8.2 14.9 14.6 14.9 13.7 174.3 70.9 59.0 46.0 716.1 719.0 461 1 887.0 26.7 17.7 *06._ 3.4 91010.61 n. IECIJMitT CBTS A. Iaevintel Stiff 21.6 4.4 27.6 22.7 20.8 17.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 116.9 0.0 0.0 23.6 29.4 e. lacreetel Opnr. Exp. s.$ 8.4 3.9 0.8 6.4 3.2 21.0 29.0 23.5 14.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.4 0.0 0.0 23.4 27.1 TO"al 31091 COSTS 30.6 12.6 1.7 23.5 28.0 21.1 21.0 29.0 23.6 14.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 234.5 0.0 0.0 3.7 U.S Totel 91SEI.I COSTS 64.2 161.0 46.6 36.1 40.9 34.8 196.8 99.9 82.5 eo.9 716.1 ns.o 461.1 367.6 309.0 16.3 $66.6 30.9 e.3 Physical Coetleg-e 2.3 15.9 1.S 1.6 1.5 1.4 30.1 10.6 6.1 7.1 134.0 134.3 85.3 72.2 S06. Prie ContlegIae. 11.8 73.2 1l.s 9.4 10.1 8.6 64.7 23.1 19.2 13.1 209.0 237.6 154.4 120.3 956.1 14.0 134.0 _ _ - - -- - - -- - - -- -- -- -- - - - -- - - _ - _ _ _ _ -- -- - - - - Tot# PROJCT COSTS 68.3 260.1 59.6 46.9 52.6 44.8 260.2 133.4 109.8 61.1 1059.1 1091.0 700.9 680.1 4559.9 14.0 639.8 21.0 05.1 Tam 0.1 92.6 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 6.0 1.9 1.6 1.2 18.7 19.2 12.1 10.1 183.1 12.2 19.9 Forign E _Cang 8.4 108.1 8.7 8.2 8.8 7.8 68.7 36.2 38.8 20.0 94.3 96.3 64.6 51.6 607.5 12.6 77.6 atin Scaled by 1000000.0 4118/1992 9:31 a "3 I: s-aX mx_ India DM Safety Project S_mary Accounts by Year Totals Including Contingencies Totals Including Contingenties RS. N us, I 91/92 92/93 98/94 94/95 95/96 98/97 Total 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/9S 95/96 96/97 Total I. DIESTEN COSTS A. Civil Work. 194.7 393.8 718.2 748.0 726.0 548.2 8828.8 9.7 16.5 31.8 31.8 29.8 21.6 142.9 B. Equipment 58.8 94.0 81.8 62.7 78.6 62.5 422.9 2.7 4.4 3.6 2.7 3.2 2.1 18.0 C. Lan Acquisition 1.4 1.6 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.9 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 D. Training, TA. Consultants 23.5 26.7 33.2 17.9 16.6 17.4 138.3 1.2 1.3 1.5 0.8 0.7 0.7 6.0 E. Design, Suprvis.& Admin. 19.8 42.5 83.2 68.6 85.0 65.1 384.2 1.0 2.0 3.7 3.8 3.5 2.6 18.5 Total IWESTENT COSTS 293.3 568.6 911.8 917.1 906.1 63.2 4270.1 14.6 28.2 40.7 88.9 38.9 27.0 184.2 II. RECURRE COSIS A. Incr.afntal Staff 13.7 19.1 27.3 29.1 80.9 27.8 147.3 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.1 6.4 B. Incr_.ntal Opw. Exp. 18.8 20.5 24.5 26.1 27.7 25.0 142.5 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 6.r Total RECREIT COSTS 32.6 39.6 61.8 55.1 68.6 52.8 289.8 1.6 1.9 2.8 2.3 2.4 2.1 12.8 Total PROJECT COSTS 325.8 598.1 963.8 972.2 964.7 738.4 4669.9 16.2 28.1 43.0 41.3 39.3 29.0 196.8 Valus Scaled by 1000000.0 4/18/1991 9:31 In-a, 0KH X-a 'a'- India DM Safety Project Projects Compomnts by Tear Totals Including Cont7ngsncies Totals Including Contingenies RS. u use u 91/92 92/93 98/94 94/96 9S/98 96/97 Total 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/9S 95/96 96/97 Total A. GOI/CRC Activities 1. Institutional Strnghten. 12.6 14.2 18.2 9.7 9.7 8.8 68.3 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.3 3.0 2. Flood Forecasting System 13.6 29.5 42.5 51.3 68.0 47.1 250.1 0.7 1.4 1.9 2.2 2.7 1.9 10.7 Sub-Total 26.3 43.7 65.8 61.0 75.7 65.9 318.4 1.3 2.0 2.6 2.6 3.1 2.2 13.7 3. States Instit. Strength. 1. Madhya Pradsh 6.5 10.7 13.4 9.8 10.4 8.8 59.8 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.3 2.8 2. Crim 6.0 9.1 11.2 7.4 7.9 7.3 48.9 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 2.1 3. Rajasthan 6.1 10.0 11.8 7.9 6.4 8.2 52.5 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 2.3 4. Tamil Nadu 5.3 8.9 9.3 6.9 7.3 7.1 44.8 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 2.0 Sub-Total 23.8 38.7 45.8 82.1 84.1 31.4 205.9 1.2 1.8 2.0 1.4 1.4 1.2 9.0 C. States 8sic Safety Fac. 1. Mdhya Pradesh 44.3 47.8 48.4 49.2 52.4 38.2 280.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 1.5 12.3 2. Grim 32.6 35.1 16.5 17.5 18.6 13.2 133.4 1.6 1.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.5 6.0 3. Rajast3an 14.3 42.1 23.8 10.6 11.1 8.0 109.8 0.7 2.0 1.1 0.4 0.5 0.3 5.0 0D 4. Ti"I ! Nad. 17.0 23.3 21.6 6.8 7.1 5.6 81.1 0.8 1.1 1.0 0.3 0.3 0.2 3.7 Sub-Total 108.1 148.1 110.2 84.0 89.8 64.8 604.6 6.4 7.0 4.9 3.6 3.6 2.6 27.0 D. States Remedial Works 1. Madhy Pradesh 73.8 172.7 227.4 234.0 184.8 166.3 1059.1 3.7 8.1 10.1 9.9 7.5 6.6 45.9 2. Orim 41.9 74.3 246.4 259.9 275.5 193.2 1091.0 2.1 3.6 11.0 11.0 11.2 7.6 46.4 a. Rajasthan 20.0 46.5 155.6 174.4 183.8 120.5 700.9 1.0 2.2 6.9 7.4 7.S 4.8 29.8 4. Tmil aNdu 31.8 74.2 122.4 126.8 121.5 103.4 680.1 1.6 3.6 5.6 5.4 4.9 4.1 24.9 Sub-Total 167.5 387.8 751.8 795.2 765.8 683.4 3431.1 8.3 17.3 33.5 33.8 31.2 23.0 147.1 Total PROJECTS COSTS 325.8 598.1 963.6 972.2 964.7 785.4 4559.9 16.2 28.1 43.0 41.3 39.3 29.0 196.8 _~~~~~~~~ ____ _______-- h---------__ --- - _---- --___-------__- - ---------___ _______ Valus Scaled by 1000000.0 4/18/1991 9:31 |i India DM Safety Project RS. 1 Project Components by Year asse Costa Total 91/92 92/93 98/94 94/96 95/98 96/97 RS.M USOM A. G0OI/CWC Activities 1. Institutional Strn9ghten. 11.2 11.8 10.6 7.5 7.1 6.0 54.2 8.0 2. F:ood Forecasting Systems 11.0 22.0 29.9 82.9 89.0 26.2 161.0 8.9 Sub-total 22.2 33.8 40.4 40.4 46.1 82.2 215.2 12.0 8. States Instit. Strength. 1. Madhya Pradeh 5.9 8.9 10.6 7.6 7.6 6.0 46.8 2.6 2. Oriasa 5.4 7.5 8.7 5.7 5.7 4.9 38.1 2.1 3. Rajasthan 5.6 8.3 9.2 6.1 6.1 5.6 40.9 2.3 4. Te il Nadu 4.7 7.3 7.3 5.3 5.3 4.8 84.8 1.9 sub-total 21.6 32.1 85.9 24.8 24.8 21.8 160.4 8.9 C. States Basic Safety Fac. 1. Madbya Pradesh 36.3 36.3 34.6 32.8 32.8 22.6 196.3 10.8 2. Orissa 27.3 27.3 12.4 12.3 12.8 8.3 99.9 5.6 3. Rajasthan 12.3 32.5 17.4 7.6 7.6 5.2 82.5 4.6 4. Tmi I Nadu 14.2 18.0 15.6 4.9 4.8 3.5 60.9 8.4 'a -_-___ __ _ _ _ ___ ____ 0a sub-total 90.1 114.1 79.9 57.6 57.4 89.6 438.6 24.4 D. States Resmeial Works 1. Madhya Pradesh 59.6 129.9 160.2 154.6 114.7 97.2 718.1 39.8 2. Oriss 33.9 65.9 173.6 171.7 171.0 112.9 719.0 39.9 3. Rajasthan 16.3 35.1 109.9 115.3 114.1 70.4 461.1 25.6 4. Tamil Nadu 25.7 65.8 96.3 83.8 75.6 60.4 387.6 21.6 sub-total 136.5 276.7 530.0 625.4 475.3 340.9 2288.9 126.9 Total BASELINE COSTS 269.4 456.7 686.2 648.1 603.5 434.1 8098.0 172.1 Physical Contingencies 39.3 71.3 113.9 109.3 100.6 71.4 505.8 28.1 Price Contingencies 17.0 70.1 183.5 214.9 260.6 230.0 956.1 -3.4 Total PROJECT COSTS 325.8 598.1 968.6 972.2 964.7 735.4 4559.9 196.8 Taxes 11.0 18.6 27.0 83.5 41.3 31.7 168.1 7.0 Foreign Exchange 56.0 100.9 126.5 114.7 121.0 88.S 607.5 26.4 lues Scaled by 1000000.049 - -: ------ --------- - ------ - ----- ---- Volu s Scaled by 1000000.0 4/18/1991 9:31 Fl India Dam Safety Project RS. N Sumary Accounts by Year Base Costs Foreign Exchange 91/92 92/93 93/94 94/96 96/96 98/97 Total X Amount I. DIVESTMEfl COSTS A. Civil Works 156.2 292.8 496.8 488.7 446.7 316.8 2198.1 8.0 176.7 B. Equipment 44.2 71.1 S8.6 39.7 48.0 28.6 286.2 S.2 160.8 C. Land Acquisition 1.3 1.3 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 D. Training, TA, Consultants 20.2 21.4 24.8 12.6 10.9 10.7 100.5 20.0 20.1 E. Design, Supervis.4 Acnin. 17.3 34.0 63.s 63.6 67.3 41.3 277.6 4.8 13.2 Total INVESTMEBT COSTS 238.2 421.2 642.6 804.4 S59.9 397.4 2888.7 12.9 369.8 II. RECURRENT COSTS F. Incrmental Staff 13.2 17.2 23.1 23.1 23.1 19.2 118.9 0.0 0.0 0. Incremental Oper. Exp. 18.0 18.3 20.5 20.5 20.6 17.4 116.4 6.0 5.8 Total RECURRENT COSTS 31.2 3S.5 43.6 43.6 43.6 36.6 234.3 2 5 S.8 Total BASELDNE COSTS 269.4 45.7 886.2 648.1 603.S 434.1 3098.0 12.1 37S.6 Physical Continoencies 89.3 71.3 113.9 109.3 100.6 71.4 S(S.8 10.8 64.6 Price Contingencies 17.0 70.1 163.6 214.9 260.6 230.0 956.1 18.5 177.3 Total PROJECT COSTS 32S.8 S98.1 963.8 972.2 964.7 735.4 4569.9 13.3 607.5 Taxes 11.0 18.6 27.0 33.5 41.3 31.7 163.1 0.0 0.0 Foreign Exchange 56.0 100.9 126.S 114.7 121.0 88.6 607.s 100.0 607.s Values Scaled by 1000000.0 4/18/1991 9:31 I-', F tD India Dm Safety Project Financing Plan by Disburseomnt Category uSS u Governrent of IDA/IBD India Total Local For. (Excl. Duties Amount X Amount X Amount X Exch. Taxes) A Tax. A. Civil Works 128.6 90.0 14.3 10.0 142.9 72.6 13.1 127.0 2.9 S. Land 0.0 0.0 0.2 100.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 C. Equipmnt 13.7 73.S 4.9 28.5 18.6 9.5 10.8 3.8 4.1 D Con., TA, Training 6.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 3.1 1.3 4.7 0.0 E Dosign & Supervision 0.0 0.0 16.5 100.0 16.6 8.4 0.9 15.6 0.0 F. Incremental Staff 4.7 73.2 1.7 26.8 6.4 3.2 0.0 6.4 0.0 0. Incre. Operating Costs 0.0 0.0 6.2 100.0 6.2 3.2 0.4 5.9 0.0 Total Disbursment 153.0 77.7 43.8 22.3 196.8 100.0 26.4 163.4 7.0 Values Scaled by 1000000.0 4/18/1991 9:31 OD X - 99 - Bank/IDA F4iaeal Yaar us$ millions 1992 First 8.0 8.0 5 Second 7.6 15.6 10 1993 First 7.7 23.3 15 Second 9.2 32.5 21 1994 First 10.7 43.2 28 Second 12.2 55.4 36 1995 First 16.9 72.3 47 Second 18.3 90.6 59 1996 First 18.4 109.0 71 Second 15.3 124.3 81 1997 First 15.3 139.6 91 Second 10.8 150.4 98 1998 First 2.6 153.0 100 - 100 - Annex 13 INDIA DAM SAFETY PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE 101 102 os9s 1994 19CS 1 _lo hT 1n121A14 1121a (41121814Fod2d4 1121r 411 OSPmlaral Irjc I _11 s ODMPM aond Tending dn lIupecllone.liwatIgatIonpa,oull"e E h hE * * _delp _pmpd _u *W. ...l. .. Conalruston,Su00 iaon WP " woCmwtts *W COMM"_____ _____ D5>' 1PAW.1`11tnnd&n. _ ___ __!ee __HTe___ e__ 0yUnC"0* 4dr(20 _ _ _ t _____n CrATE 1111 _ _ _ _ aqwiuat conm * _____ _____ IT'TRBllnd Aensun__ _____ _____ TYPM&TYPEA IDAM__ ___ ___ A__M _S_ 8AEl * forU slfow a _____ n _____ Wsaft"% -W Ar _____ _____ 080p Equnt ftm LA ___ ____ o ____ X auve" Ro r_-Ib ArV w r- 010" .I InveT IpWII|_lon_ __ -TYPCAL TYPECDAM (21DAMS) |jjij|jjj|j_t Db pqInord Tend 11 1 1" W 1MALTYPEBMtD)- 00" n.rr ro ru_ _ Fb Dos" PR waZpt vl _r r _ _ | hO"nsdTeibn _|||up ||| ___ __n I~~~~~- Ce ibnFT Ezr T E|. ___ | TNCLTPECAi OUb ll l ll l =" =- ==- INDIA DAM SAFETY PROJECT PROCUJREMENT SO4HOUE Remote comikmicat ion and 1 34- Bata Processing System A/eu,- ~ t - for Fore-casting Networks ICD 13.2 --- fdial Works for.- Fagara Dam Nadhva PrAdesh T..LR 1 . Remedial Works Per iyar Dam Tami I sdu L.CD 3.5 c -- . Remedial Works Pillova Dam Basic Facilities Equipmut Nadlwa Prsde.sh LCB 1.0 ~TC Basic Facilities orissaC 9 CU ' - Basic IFacilities Equipnmet Rajauthan LCB I.8 C> .- Basic Facilities ~A Equipinnt *tndial Works Retinal Dam NahsPradesh ILCD 3.0 - Reeial Works W5L.- eIl Badu LCDB . oc,muan. .cvrns W~~~~~~~~~~~~~~T.000POTmeRVA ..MOIn.a,sAwRAnw POOInmsWeAwrnsOCUi.Sn e lfSEPllAM0 A.,ASN M.C.1s sn~twin M0VOinAA0"AflfSa 3 MNt CWAA,:AmlIltht1O C5APST.QI .afCUIflnht meICCCSAC NCC*U 555 *,hIm .ccaotr I/ Exclusive of duties and taxes. 9. Work or delivery complete ah - 102 - A£M-1 Page 1 of 2 D_A RAPT PRfl13( 1AN RtPll:RVIS:I6W IMPtTI TNIEO KIC? AflYIVYT!TUIS Approximate Expected Skill Staff Input Dates Activity Requirements (staffweeks) 6/91 Coordinate LCB contract Procurement & Task Manager. 1.0 review. 8/91 Complete evaluation of LCB R. M. Procurement. 1.2 procedures. 9/91 Pronjct Launeh Workshop Review Implementation Sched. Task Manager, International 8.0 Workshop with chairman DSRP, Dam Safety Consultant, clear procurement procedures, MIS/Project Management assure reporting system esta- State Government Consultant, blished, review staffing Procurement Specialist. status, initiate library acquisitioning, start selec- tion of consultants on gate simulations. 1/92 SRuorvia on M"*innn Review of remedial design I Task Manager, Project 6.0 DSRP activities in each state Management Specialist, TOR's on consultancies DSO State Government Consultant. program & inspection sche- dules, DSC procedures. 5/92 Suparvisain Miasion Review initial contracting Task Manager, Dam Engineer 7.0 and active construction, State Consultant, attend 2-3 DSRP meetings MIS/Project Management, field visits of active inspec- Procurement Specialist. tion teams, upgrade project reporting, review DSC prioriti- zation examine IMD progress with CWC and Flood Operations Simulation Software. - 103 - Page 2 of 2 Approximate Expected Skill Staff Input Dates Activity Requirements (staff weeks) 10/92 Supr3EsiQn Miamian Evaluation construction Task Manager, State 8.0 program, quality cortrol, Consultant, Training procurement, review flood Specialist, Construction forecasting evaluations, Engineer. state staffing progress, training programs 5/93 SugArvininn Mianin 9/93 Normal progress Task Manager, State 8.0 Consultant, Specialists as required. 2/94 Mid-Term Review Task Mngr., atate Consultant, 11.0 international. Dam Safety Consultant, MIS/Project Management, Procurement/ Disbursements 8/94 Supervision Thereafter Twice per year.