OFFICIAL USE ONLY IDA/R2007-0099/1 May 3, 2007 Streamlined Procedure For meeting of Board: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 FROM: Vice President and Corporate Secretary Nigeria - HIV/AIDS Programme Development Project Additional Financing Credit Project Paper Attached is the Project Appraisal Document regarding a proposed additional financing credit to the Federal Republic of Nigeria for a HIV/AIDS Programme Development Project (IDA/R2007-0099). This project will be taken up at a meeting of the Executive Directors on Tuesday, May 22, 2007 under the Streamlined Procedure. Distribution: Executive Directors and Alternates President Bank Group Senior Management Vice Presidents, Bank, IFC and MIGA Directors and Department Heads, Bank, IFC and MIGA This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank Group authorization. Documento f The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USEONLY ReportNo: 39409-NG PROJECTPAPER ONA PROPOSEDADDITIONALFINANCING INTHEAMOUNT OF SDR33.1MILLION(US$SO MILLIONEQUIVALENT) TO THE FEDERALREPUBLICOFNIGERIA FORA HIV/AIDS PROGRAMMEDEVELOPMENTPROJECT May2,2007 HumanDevelopment I11 CountryDepartmentAFCW2 Africa Region This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without WorldBank authorization. CURRENCYEQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective March 31,2007) Currency Unit =NigerianNaira Nigerian Naira 128 =US$1 US$1.51= SDRl FISCALYEAR January 1 December 31 ABBREVIATIONSAND ACRONYMS AIDS Acquired ImmuneDeficiency Syndrome API AIDS ProgramEffort Index CBO Community-based Organization CDD Community-Driven Development C G Consultative Group CPS Country Partnershp Strategy CSP Country Strategy Paper cso Civil Society Organization DFID Department for International Development (UK) EU EuropeanUnion FGN Federal Government o f Nigeria FMF Federal Ministry o fFinance FMR Financial Management Report FY FiscalYear GDP Gross Domestic Product GNP Gross National Product HAF HIV/AIDS Fund HIPC Highly IndebtedPoor Country HIV Human Immuno-deficiency Virus IDA International Development Association IEC Information, Education and Communication IMF International Monetary Fund ISR ImplementationStatus and Results Report LGA Local Government Area LOAG Loan Administration Group M A P Multi-country AIDS Program MDG MillenniumDevelopmentGoal M&E Monitoring and Evaluation M I S Management Information Systems N A C A National Agency for the Control of AIDS NBS National Bureau o f Statistics NEEDS National Economic Empowerment and Development Strategy NIF Not IDA Financed N G O Non-Governmental Organization ovc Orphans and Vulnerable Children P A D Project Appraisal Document PDO Project Development Objective SA Special Account SACA State Action Committee on AIDS SDR Standard Drawing Rights SOE Statement o f Expense TTL Task Team Leader USD United States Dollar V C T Voluntary Counseling and Testing Acting Vice President: Hart Schafer Country Director: Hafez Ghanem Sector Manager: Laura Frigenti Task Team Leader: JohnElder .. 11 PROJECTPAPERDATA SHEET Borrower: FederalRepublico fNigeria Responsible agency: National Agency for the Control of HIV & AIDS /State Project Teams policies? oYes X N o Have these been approvedby Bank management? oYes N o Revisedproject development objectives/outcomes Reducing the risk o f HIV infections through behavior change. Improving access to HIV/AIDS counseling, testing and care services. Does the scaled-up or restructured project trigger any new safeguard policies? N o The additional financing does not involve any changes inproject activities. However, since the original project was given a C rating, the Bank's evaluation o f these activities has changed and they now require a Brating. A hazardous medical waste management planis currently being prepared. __. For Additional Financing [ILoan [XICredit []Grant For Loans/Credits/Grants: Total Bank financing (US$): $50 million Proposed terms: Standard IDA Credit Terms Financing Plan (US$m.) Source Local Foreign Total Borrower IBRD/IDA 45.O 5.0 50.0 Total 45.0 1 5.0 50.0 ~ ... 111 NIGERIA-HIV/AIDS PROGRAMMEDEVELOPMENTPROJECT TABLEOFCONTENTS I INTRODUCTION . ...................................................................................... 1 I1. BACGROUNDAND RATIONALE FORADDITIONAL FINANCING .......................... 1 I11. PROPOSEDCHANGES ............................................................................. 3 I V . PROJECTIMPLEMENTATION, FINANCIALMANAGEMENT, DISBURSEMENT AND PROCUREMENTARRANGEMENTS .......................................................... 4 V . CONSISTENCY WITH THE COUNTRY PARTNERSHIP STRATEGY ...................................................................................... 5 VI. EXPECTEDOUTCOMES ....................................................................... 6 VI1. BENEFIT AND RISKS.. ........................................................................ 6 VI11 FINANCIALTERMSAND CONDITIONSFORTHEADDITIONAL . FINANCING ..................................................................................... 7 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULEA: ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS ....................................................... 8 SCHEDULE B: PROCUREMENT ARRANGEMENTS ................................................ 13 SCHEDULE C: INDICATORSAND PROPOSEDCHANGES .......................................... 19 I.Introduction 1. This Project Paper seeks the approval ofthe Executive Directors to provide additional financing inan amount o f SDR 33.1 million ( US$50 million) to the Federal Republic of Nigeria, HIV/AIDS Programme Development Project, (PO7029 l), (Cr.3556 UNI),and introduce changes inthe project andaccompanyingamendments to theproject's legal documents. 2. The proposed additional financing will help finance the costs associated with the scaling up o fthe project from 14to 35 states (the scaling up occurred in2005 inconjunction withthe mid-termproject restructuring). N o changes to the general design, and implementation modalities are sought. The project development objective will be modified to take into account recommendations made under the umbrella restructuring o f projects under the multi-country HIV/AIDS programfor Africa. Key performance indicators will be modifiedto reflect the increased geographic scope o f the project and align it with Bank wide good practice relatedto HIV/AIDS monitoring frameworks. A follow-on project i s being planned, but will take longer than anticipatedto prepare inorder to ensure effective integration with other donor funding and the incorporation o fthe results of a recently completedassessment ofthe on-going project. 3. The additional financing would ensurethat: (i) is continuity untilthe newproject is there operational, (ii) project maximizes the achievement o f the development objective and the outcomes, (iii) the national monitoring and evaluation system i s strengthened, (iv) more targeted civil society actions would be supportedthrough the HIV/AIDS Fund(HAF),and (v) the project continues to complement the work on treatment by the Ministry o f Health, inwhich the Global Fundis financing Anti-Retrovirals and the project is financing the necessary infrastructure and training. 11.BackgroundandRationalefor AdditionalFinancing 4. Project Background: Nigeria has the largest population inAfrica with a GDP of about US$116.4 billion (2006) and a population o f about 140 million. Of that, 4.4% are living with HIV,malungNigeriathe country withthe thirdhighestHIVpositivepopulation inthe world, after India and South Africa. The revisedproject development objectives are: (i) reducing the risk o f HIV infections through behavior change and (ii) improving accessto HIV/AIDS counseling, testing and care services. The original Development Credit Agreement inthe amount o f US$90.3 millionwas approved on July 6,2001. It became effective on April 26,2002, and the original closing date was June 30,2006. It has now been extended to June 30,2007. The project i s currently 80% disbursed with all ofthe remaining funds committed. The project has three components: 1) developing capacity at the federal and state levels to enhance coordination mechanisms; this component supports capacity-building activities and incremental operating costs o f the National Agency for the Control of HIV & AIDS (NACA) at the federal level and the state project teams at the state level. 2) expanding the public sector response; this component finances HIV/AIDS activities supportedby line ministries based on annual proposalspreparedby the ministries with support from the project teams, and 3) supporting civil society organizations through the HIV/AIDSFund(HAF). The HAFprovides fundingto NGOsthat submitproposalsto the federal and stateproject teams. 1 These proposals respondto criteria established by each state and NACA. There have beenno changes to the original objectives since the project was launched. 5. Project Performance: The project progressedslowly untilit was restructured and scaled up inearly 2005. At the beginning ofthe project there was some confusion on the relativeroles o fNACA, the State Action Committees on AIDS (SACA) and the State Project Teams (SPT). At the state levels, the SPTs were meant to implement project activities under the guidance of the SACAs who were to provide input on strategic issues, but not on day to day implementation. At the federal level, N A C A struggledwith the implementation o fmultipledonor funded activities, each of which funded its own personnelwithin N A C A and led to a fragmentation o f staff into project groups. At both state and federal levels there were serious capacity constraints. 6. The restructuring focusedonrationalizing the structure ofNACA andbuilding its capacity, clarifying the roles o f the State Action Committees on HIV/AIDS and the State Project Teams and opening the project to all states that meet the agreed selection criteria. Scaling up the project was the result o f increasing demands from non-project states to be included inproject activities and the strategic decision that an effective response to HIV/AIDSneeded to be implemented at the national level. The project had been designed to work in 16 states and at the time o f the restructuring 14 states hadjoined the project. The team anticipated 10-12 additional states would join after the restructuring. However, inthe end an additional 21 states met the conditions for joining the project. 7. Nigeria now has the institutional infrastructure inplace to effectively utilize the donor funds cominginto the country. HAFactivities at the national and state levels have progressed well. The implementation of HAFactivities inthe new states has beenmuchfaster andmore efficient because these states have benefited from the experience o f the older states. The monitoring and evaluation systemhas been rolled out to all states and the Global AIDS Monitoring & Evaluation Team (GAMET)has beenproviding technical assistanceto prepare a more comprehensive national monitoringand evaluation framework. However, there are still significant weaknesses inthe actual performance o f the system. The project i s currently being supported by GAMET to put inplace a plan for improving performance. NACA has prepared a first draft o f the financing plan for the national strategic framework and i s inthe process of discussing fundingneeds with interested partners. 8. Financial commitment by the Government o f Nigeria has beenpromising. It has contributed, through NACA, approximately Bs 2.0 billion' (actual expenditure) from 2000 to June 2005. In2006, W 1.18 billion2has been allocated to NACA and for HIV/AIDSprogram activities o f the Federal Ministryo f Health(FMOH) and the Ministry o f Women Affairs, among others. There i s thus clear indication that Government will continue to provide committed leadership. 9. Rationalefor Additional Financing: The government has requestedadditional financing to support the scaling up o f the project. Since the project was restructured and scaled up inearly 2005, the number o f participating states has dramatically increased and implementation inmany states has beenrapid. As a result, many states and the federal level have insufficient funds to finance their 2007 workplans. The situation i s particularly serious inthe HIV/AIDS Fund component where states are not able to finance all eligible proposals. At the national level, N A C A also has a significant backlog o f approved HAFproposalswaiting for funding. Although the Government is deeply committed to the project and has started to design an HIV/AIDS I Equivalent to US$15.6 million Equivalent to US$9.2 million 2 ProgramDevelopment Project I1(Project 11) as follow-on to the original project, the extensive internal and external consultationprocess for the preparationo f the follow-on project will require a longer time than anticipated leaving a potential gap infundingbetween the first and second projects. The second project i s now scheduled for early FY09. Without the additional financing to cover the increased costs as the result o f scaling up, there is a very high risk that the institutional structures built-upunder the current project will be critically weakened. 10. The additional financing will continue the support for the institutional strengtheningof NACA, the SACAs and CSOs. Itwill also support SACAs to develop monitored and costed strategies and annual workplans, whichwill help lay the groundwork for the newproject. It will also provide necessary funds to further strengthenthe monitoring and evaluation system interms of quality and efficiency o f data collection and use indecision-making and policy development, an essential pre-requisite to ensure an effective design o f the second project. 11. Based on the latest Implementation Status Results andReport (ISR) updated in November 2006, the project continues to progress satisfactorily. Implementationperformance ratings inthe ISR are satisfactory for overall implementation progress (IF)and development objectives (DOs). 111.ProposedChanges 12. There are no changes proposed to the project's design and scope. The project development objective is beingchanged inline with changes under the MAP Umbrella restructuring. The new PDO is: (i) Reducing the risko f HIV infections through behavior change. (ii) Improving access to HIV/AIDScounseling, testing and care services. Several indicators are beingaddedto better monitor the revisedPDO. Some keyperformance indicators will be modifiedto reflect the scaling up o f activities and to more precisely define the expected outcomes o f the original project. The credit terms and conditions will remain the same. 13. After designing therestructuring and scaling upofthe project inlate 2004, the project credit agreement was amended in2005 as part o f the project restructuring and scaling up exercise and to reflect the changes inthe Country Financing Parameters -indicating 100percent financing inall categories andthe closing date was extendedonce for atotal oftwelve months. The - extension was to ensure completion o f project activities -especially given the slow takeoff. 14. The total project costs ofthe additional financing will amount to U S $50 millionover a period o f 24 months beyond the current closing date (June 2007). A new closing date o f June 30, 2009 i s proposedto accommodate the completion o f project activities including support to the scaled up project activities and the financing o f NGO activities underway and pending. The extendedperiod will be sufficient to achieve amended targets. A separate procurement plan for the additional financing, reflecting the actual project implementation needs has been prepared. The planhasbeenreviewedand agreed at negotiations by the Bank and the Borrower.The financial management, disbursement arrangements and procurement methods will follow those of the current project. 15. Changes in the allocation ofproject Yesources to states. Based on the request from Government, a total o f US$32.5 million would be allocated as supplementary amounts to the currently participating states based on their needs. US$17.5 millionwould be allocated to NACA. 3 16. Therecent Guidelineson SanctionReforms apply to the Additional Financingbut not to the initial credit. So the revised General Conditions, Procurement and Consultants' Guidelines, and Anti-Corruption Guidelines will apply to the Additional Financing 17. To bringthe originalDevelopment Credit Agreement o f the Project inconsistency with the proposedAdditional Financing, an amendment to the original Development CreditAgreement is necessaryto (a) amend he project development objectives and performance indicators, (b) extend the closing date; and (c) requiring the use o f the National Healthcare Waste Management Plan. 18. Accordingly the Project will be governedby two legal agreements: (a) a full Financing Agreement for the additional financing usingthe new model form for additional financing; and (b) a simpleamendment agreement of the original Development Credit Agreement: (i) amending the project development objectives andperformance indicators, (ii) extending the closing date; and (iii) requiringthe use o fthe NationalHealthcareWaste Management Plan. BothAgreements will processed as part o fthis Additional Financingpackage FinancialSummary IMPLEMENTATIONPERIOD Year 1 Year 2 Project Costs Investment Costs 14,700,000 34,700,000 Recurrent Costs 300,000 300,000 Total Project Costs Financing IE3RD/IDA 15,000,000 35,000,000 Total Project Financing 19. The total additional financing cost, includingtaxes and duties, i s estimated at US$50 million. The bulk o f the project financing, approximately 55 percent, will be allocated towards NGO and CSO grants. The breakdown of estimated costs i s shown in Schedule A. The procurement arrangements -agreed with the Borrower - are displayed inSchedule B. The project i s closely andregularly supervised by the Bank team, especially with respect to fiduciary and environmental safeguards. IV. ProjectImplementation,FinancialManagement,Disbursement andProcurement Arrangements 20. The Bank has reviewed the economic, financial, technical, fiduciary, environmental, and social aspects o f the proposed additional activities. As reviewedbelow, appraisal verifies that all arrangements are set, fiduciary controls are inplace, and the borrower i s ready to implement the additional activities. 21. Implementation mechanisms. Implementation arrangements would be the same under the additional financing as for the ongoing project, as they work well. At the federal level, the project will be implemented by NACA. NACA's capacity has increased substantially, at least 4 partly due to activities financed under the existing project. At the state level, the state project teams (SPTs) will continue to beresponsible for implementation in close coordination with the SACAs. The M&E system that i s now inplace inall states will be strengthened as part o f the additional financing. 22. The originalproject was given an environmental category o f C. However, according to current practice it shouldbe a B due to the generation of medical waste at testing and treatment sites. A hazardous medical waste management planhas been finalized. NACA will engage the services of an environmental health specialist to operationalize the implementation o f the National HealthCare Waste Management Plan. 23. Financial management arrangements: Inaccordance with Bank policy andprocedures, the financial management arrangements o f the project have been reviewedand, as there are no proposed changes, the documents prepared for the existing credit are still binding and acceptable. The FMperformance for the current project i s satisfactory and fiduciary riski s low. All external audit reports were duly submitted. These have been reviewed by the FinancialManagement Specialist and the issues noted inthe last FMsupervision have been clearedby the project entities. Financial management under the HAF component has been satisfactory. 24. Procurement arrangements: Inthe past, procurement capacity inthe Public Sector in the country was weak as identified inthe 2000 Country ProcurementAssessment Review (CPAR) and 2004 Lagos State ProcurementAssessment Review (LSPAR). Since then, substantialprogress has been made both at the federal and some states levels to improve the weak capacity. Currently, the Government Procurement reformprogrami s being supported by IDF Grants and an ongoing IDA Credit -Economic Reform and Governance Project with a substantial component focusing on procurement reforms i s assisting Government address the weak procurement capacity inthe public sector and to build appropriate partnership with the private sector. Most o f the required tools such as the procurement codes and implementing regulations, national standard biddingdocuments, are being finalized. Improvement inpublic procurement practice has beennoticed and public expenditure has been more efficient and cost effective. 25. Generally, the procurement management function o f the project has continuedto be satisfactory. On this basis, the arrangements for the proposed additional financing will be the same as the arrangements under the current project. However, procurement o f goods and works to be financed out o f the proceeds of the financing shall be governed by the "Guidelines for Procurement under IBRDLoans and IDA Credit" publishedby the Bank inMay 2004 andrevised inOctober, 2006. Procurementofconsultants' services shallbe governedbythe "Guidelines for the Selection and Employment of Consultants by World Bank Borrowers" publishedby the Bank inMay2004 andrevisedinOctober, 2006. A separateprocurement planfor the additional financing, reflecting the actual project implementationneeds has beenprepared. The planhas beenreviewedand agreed at negotiations by the Bank and the Borrower. Implementation i s progressing satisfactorily. There i s no experience o f undue (political) interference inthe project procurement process. Therefore the procurement risk o f the project i s assessed as moderate. V. Consistencywiththe CountryPartnershipStrategy 26. The additional financing for HIV/AIDS supports the current Country Partnership Strategy (CPS) inNigeria. The strategy recognizes that Nigeria faces considerable human development challenges includingHIV/AIDS. Combating HIVIAIDSi s one o f the long-term goals o f the CPS and improving access to prevention, VCT, and care and support services related 5 to HIV/AIDS is an important CPS outcome. It i s in agreement with the National Economic Empowerment and Development Strategy (NEEDS) that emphasizes the importance of HIV/AIDSas a cross-cutting issue withpotentially devastatingconsequences. VI. ExpectedOutcomes 27. As statedinthe Project Development Objective, the benefits ofthe projectare a reduced risk o f HIV infections through behavior change and an improved accessto HIV/AIDS counseling, testing and care services. The scaled up project is extendingthe benefits of the original project to an additional 21 states, byproviding financing inthe new states for all three components o f the project. Indicators will be updated to take into account the increasednumber of states and the increased financing for NGO activities. Some o fthe existing indicators will be modifiedor eliminated to match similar indicators inthe Nigeria National Strategic Framework and to align the project with overall changes inindicators recommended by the Umbrella restructuring o f World Bank HIV/AIDS project inAfrica. The full set o f performance indicators and the proposedchanges are shown inSchedule C. VII. BenefitsandRisks 28. BeneJits. The benefits remain as describedinthe original Project Appraisal Document. These includeproviding improved care and support, destigmatizing AIDS, and strengthening capacity at national, state and community levels. The additional financing will ensure that: (i) the institutional architecture for HIV/AIDS inthe country i s maintained untilthe new project begins, (ii) theproject'simpactontheimprovementofhumandevelopmentoutcomesisexpanded, that and (iii)about 1000NGOmicro-projects that are proposed or underway are completed. 29. Rish. Most o f the risks are linkedto the political environment inNigeria and some associated project risks mentioned inthe PAD remainvalid, but they are assessedas less . significant comparedto the beginning o f the project. Political risk (substantial risk). Nigeria faced a degree o f political uncertainty inthe run-up to general elections, which were concluded inApril 2007. This reflects the nature o f the political system, where competition for office i s intense. As new governments are settling in at the federal level and inthe states where the project i s implemented, there will be a greater need for outreach to obtain the same . political commitment as under the previous administrations. New political tensions interfere with project implementation (modest risk). A new Government in place may confirm its commitment to the project objectives but it may also want to revisit project implementation mechanisms and seek to have greater control over the project entities. This risk is considered to be modest. The recent legislation establishing N A C A as a government agency will help ensure continued effective implementation. The institutional arrangements at the state level are the product o f legal statutes - bills passed by legislature and signed by Governors. The Bank will continue to monitor the political situation and closely supervise implementation o f the project, in accordance with the Operational Manual and the project's annual operational plans. Weak capacity at federal or state level (moderate risk). The risk o f weak management and implementation capacity by the implementing agencies, envisaged at the start o f the 6 original project has been reduced through the recruitment o f appropriately qualified and competent management staff and a progressive clarification o f roles and responsibilities. Project staff have had extensive access to training programs. Duringimplementation, on thejob skills have beendeveloped. Transparency andfiduciary risks (low risk). The implied risk is that Credit proceeds may not be used for their intended purposes, financial transactions may not be properly accounted for, and control and procurement procedures may not be properly applied. Duringthe implementation o f the current project local skills have been developed and procurement and financial management training provided by Bank staff. Close supervision o f financial management and accounting practices o f the project will continue as under the existing project. . VIII. FinancialTerms And ConditionsFor The AdditionalFinancing 30. The financial terms and conditions for the additional financing are the same as the original credit, including the changes due to the Country FinancingParameters which allow for the various categories to be funded at 100%. The original credit allocation has also beenrevised to accommodate current disbursement o f all implementing entities. As this is, ineffect, an extension of the ongoing project without any modifications, the government o f the Federal Republic of Nigeria has accepted to adhere to the same terms and conditions as those under the existing project. 7 SCHEDULE A NIGERIA HIV/AIDS PROGRAMME DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS (in US$million equivalent) Amour :of the Initir Credit Amounts of the AdditionalCredit Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total ProjectCost by Component 1. Capacity 25.15 2.42 27.57 22.00 0 22.00 I Development 2. Expanding 28.07 3.15 3 1.22 11.oo Public Sector Response 5*0 3. HIV/AIDS 33.66 33.66 17.00 17.00 Fund Unallocated 3.7 0.13 Total Project 90.58 5.70 96.28 45.00 5.OO 50.00 costs Total 90.58 5.70 96.28 45.00 50.00 Financing Required Project Cost by Category Local Foreign Goods, 44.3 1 5.5 1 Consultant Services, Training & Audit Grants 31.65 0 3 1.65 17.00 0 17.00 Operating 10.92 0.06 10.98 0.5 0 0.5 costs Unallocated 3.7 0.13 3.83 Total Project 90.58 5.70 96.28 45.00 5.0 50.00 costs Total 90.58 5.70 96.28 45.00 5.0 50.00 Financing Required 8 ESTIMATEDALLOCATIONS' (in US$) Category Amount of the Initial Amountsofthe Percentageof CreditAllocated AdditionalCredit Expendituresto be Allocated Financed (1) Civil works 0 (2) Goods 0 (3) Grants for Sub- 0 Projects (4) Consultants' 0 services, training, study tours and audits (5) Incremental 0 Operating Costs (6) Refunding o fProject 419,025 Amount due pursuant PreparationAdvance to Section 2.02(b) of thisAgreement (7) Unallocated 10,301,975 (8) Civil works, goods, 100% Consultants' services, training, study tours and audits a) Federal 12,013,560 5,728,337 b) Akwa-Ibom 2,355,600 748,856 c) Benue 2,355,600 748,856 d) Ebonyi 1,570,400 683,044 e) Kaduna 1,805,960 748,856 f) Lagos 1,570,400 748,856 g) Taraba 1,256,320 748,856 h) Adamawa 1,020,760 683,044 i)CrossRiver 1,256,320 748,856 j) Imo 1,256,320 748,856 3 Amounts previously allocated to Categories (l),and (4) are all reallocated to and consolidated into a new category (8). Amounts (2) previously allocated to categories (3) and (5) are reallocated to new categories (9) and (IO) respectively. The amounts available for disbursement under Categories (8) through (10) are only the undisbursed balance under categories (1) through (5) as of the effective date of this amendment letter. 9 k) Kano 785,200 0 1) Plateau 1,570,400 748,85 6 m) Nasarawa 1,570,400 748,856 n) Anambra 1,020,760 748,856 0) Borno 785,200 683,044 P) Ed0 1,256,320 683,044 q) Federal Capital 1,256,320 748,856 Territory r) OYO 1,256,320 748,856 s) Niger 785,200 0 t) Sokoto 706,680 662,794 u) Zamfara 706,680 703,294 v) Katsina 706,680 662,794 w) Kebbi 706,680 703,294 x) Jigawa 706,680 662,794 y) Yobe 706,680 662,794 z) Gombe 706,680 703,294 aa) Bauchi 706,680 662,794 bb) Kogi 706,680 662,794 cc) Kwara 706,680 703,294 dd) Ogun 706,680 662,794 ee) Ondo 706,680 662,794 ff) Osun 706,680 662,794 gg) Ekiti 706,680 703,294 hh) Delta 706,680 662,794 ii)Rivers 706,680 662,794 jj) Bayelsa 706,680 662,794 kk) Abia 706,680 703,294 11) Enugu 706,680 662,794 (9) Grants for 100% of amounts Subprojects disbursed a) Federal 9,24 1,200 9,062,194 b) Akwa-Ibom 1,812,000 287,365 c) Benue 1,812,000 287,365 d) Ebonyi 1,208,000 180,115 e) Kaduna 1,389,200 287,365 f) Lagos 1,208,000 287,365 g) Taraba 966,400 287,365 h) Adamawa 785,200 180,115 i) CrossRwer 966,400 287,365 j) Imo 966,400 287,365 k) Kano 604,000 0 1) Plateau 1,208,000 287,365 m) Nasarawa 1,208,000 287,365 n) Anambra 785,200 287,365 0) Borno 604,000 180,115 PI Ed0 966,400 180,115 q) Federal Capital 966,400 287,365 Territory 10 r) OYO 966,400 287,365 s) Niger 604,000 0 t) Sokoto 543,600 147,115 u) Zamfara 543,600 213,115 v) Katsina 543,600 147,115 w) Kebbi 543,600 213,115 x) Jigawa 543,600 147,115 y) Yobe 543,600 147,115 z) Gombe 543,600 213,115 aa) Bauchi 543,600 147,115 bb) Kogi 543,600 147,115 cc) Kwara 543,600 213,115 dd) Ogun 543,600 147,115 ee) Ondo 543,600 147,115 ff) Osun 543,600 147,115 gg) Ekiti 543,600 147,115 hh)Delta 543,600 147,115 ii)Rivers 543,600 147,115 jj) Bayelsa 543,600 147,115 kk)Abia 543,600 213,115 11) Enugu 543,600 147,115 (10) Incremental 100% Operating Costs a) Federal 1,848,240 1,909,446 b) Akwa-horn 362,400 58,779 c) Benue 362,400 58,779 d) Ebonyi 241,600 36,842 e) Kaduna 277,840 58,779 f ) Lagos 241,600 58,779 g) Taraba 193,280 58,779 h) Adamawa 157,040 36,842 i) CrossRiver 193,280 58,779 j) Imo 193,280 58,779 k) Kano 120,800 0 1) Plateau 241,600 58,779 m) Nasarawa 241,600 58,779 n) Anambra 157,040 58,779 0) Bomo 120,800 36,842 P) Ed0 193,280 36,842 q) Federal Capital 193,280 58,779 Territory r) OYO 193,280 58,779 s) Niger 120,800 0 t) Sokoto 108,720 30,092 u) Zamfara 108,720 43,592 v) Katsina 108,720 30,092 w) Kebbi 108,720 43,592 x) Jigawa 108,720 30,092 y) Yobe 108.720 30,092 11 z) Gombe 108,720 I 43,592 I aa) Bauchi 108,720 30,092 bb) Kogi 108,720 30,092 cc) Kwara 108,720 43,592 dd) Ogun 108,720 30,092 ee) Ondo 108,720 30,092 ff) Osun 108,720 30,092 gg) Ekiti 108,720 30,092 hh)Delta 108,720 30,092 ii) Rivers 108,720 30,092 jj) Bayelsa 108,720 30,092 kk)Abia 108,720 43,592 11) Enugu 108,720 30,092 TOTAL AMOUNT 107,210,000 I 50,000,000 I 12 SCHEDULEB NIGERIA ADDITIONAL FINANCINGFOR THE - HIV/AIDS PRORAMME DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Generally, the procurement management function o f the project has continued to be satisfactory. The Procurement Units of the relevant implementing agencies are adequately staffed with qualified and experienced Procurement Specialists and appropriate tools to work with. Implementation o f project procurement activities is going as per the work program, and payments are effected on a timely basis. The arrangements for the proposed additional financing will be the same as the arrangements under the current project; however, the Procurement Guidelines dated 2004 andrevised in October 2006 will apply. The procurement Plan for the additional financing has been prepared and agreed to at negotiations. Based on the experience under the current project the procurement risk o f the additional financing i s assessed as moderate. PROCUREMENT ARRANGEMENTS (in US$million equivalent) Category International National Other N.1.F Total Competitive Competitive Methods c Bidding Bidding 1.Grants (HAF) NIL NIL $17,000,000 $17,000,000 2.Goods and vehicles NIL 3.Consultant services, includingaudits, and contracted staff NIL NIL 1 $6,000,000 1 1 $6,000,000 4.TrainingKapacity Building/M&E NIL NIL I $8,000,0001 I $8,000,0001 5.Incremental operating costs NIL I I I 6.HlV/AIDS Treatment Infrastructure NIL NIL I $12,500,0001 I $12,500,000 1 Total OfwhichIDA 13 NATIONAL AGENCY FOR THE CONTROL OF HIVAND AIDS NIGERIA HIV/AIDSPROGRAMMEDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Cr. No. 3556UNI ProcurementPlan Procurement Plan for 50,000,000USD Additional Financing April 2007 I.General 1. Projectinformation:NigeriaHIV/AIDSDevelopment Project Cr.No3556UNI 2. Bank's approvalDate of the procurementPlan: Original: 2002, Revision: 2007 3. Date of General Procurement Notice: July 16,2001 4. Periodto be covered by current procurement plan: 24 Months (June 30,2007 - June 30,2009) 11.GoodsandWorks andnon-consulting services. Prior Review Threshold: Procurement Decisions subject to Prior Review by the Bank as stated inAppendix 1to the Guidelines for Procurement 2. Prequalification :None. 3. Proposed Procedures for CDD Components (as per paragraph. 3.17 of the Guidelines): None Reference to (if any) Project OperationaVProcurement Manual: i. ProjectImplementationManual ii. ProcurenientManual iii. FinancialManagementManual iv. HAFmanual Note: ICB = International Competitive Bidding LIB = LimitedInternational Bidding NCB = National Competitive Bidding DC = Direct Contracting HAF = HIV/AIDSFundGrant S - - Shopping 14 Any Other Special Procurement Arrangements: NA ICB, NCB, LIB BS, Direct Contracting, etc depending on the nature, complexity and amount o f the package. The method to be used shall be detailed out in the Procurement Plans for each of the implementing Agency N A C A and the SACAs.. Procurement Packageswith Methods and Time Schedule - - 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10 Start Ref. Contract Prequalification Domestic Review Date Expected Comments No. (Description) Method (yesho) Preference by Bid- (yesho) Bank Opening (Prior Date I Post) Lot 1 3,500,000 LIB NO NO Prior July, December Details in HIViAIDS 2007 2007 NACA/ Diagnostic SACA Equipments Procurement Lot 2. Plans Test Kits and 1,500,000 LIB NO NO Prior July December consumables 2007 2007 Total 5.OmUSD 111. Selection of Consultants 1. Prior Review Threshold: Selection Method Prior Review Threshold Comments 1. QCBS (Firms) >200 All 2. Single Source (Firms) All values All 3 Consultants Qualifications (CQs) 50 A11 6 Individual Consultants (IC) <50 None QCBS - Quality and Cost Based Selection CQ - Consultants Qualifications LCS - - Least Cost Selection I C - ss - - Individual Consultants Single Source (a) Short list comprising entirely o f national consultants; Short list o f consultants for services, estimated to cost less than $200,000.00 equivalent per contract, may comprise entirely o f national consultants in accordance with the provisions of paragraph2.7 o f the consultants Guidelines (b) Any Other Special Selection Arrangements: NA (c) Consultancy Assignments with SelectionMethods and Time Schedule 15 4. Consultancy Assignments with Selection Methods and Time Schedule 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Ref. Descriptionof Estimated Selection Review Expected Comments No. Assignment cost Method by Proposals Bank Submissi (Prior I onDate Post) 1 36 Facilitation at 100,000 ICs Post NO Details in workshops NACAISACA 18Rapid Assessment 250,000 I C s Post Procurement consultants Plans 15 Training consultants 100,000 ICs Post NO 6 Procurement and financial management 50,000 I C s Post NO consultants 5 Programme 150,000 ICs Post NO planning consultants, 25 M& Eand other 250,000 I C s Post NO short term consultants etc. 20 support staff at workshops 100,000 ICs Post NO Total lmUSD 2 "34 CSO Mapping 500,000 CQS Post NO Ditto *37 Surveillance 2,500,000 CQS Post NO Ditto Surveys *34 Sectors situation analysis assessments 1,000,000 CQS Post NO Ditto - Total 4mUSD * Eacstate i s expected to carry heir activities at the state wels 16 IV. ImplementinpAgency CapacityBuilding:Activitieswith Time Schedule 1. The Capacity Building Activities (are in the NACNSACAs Workpland ProcurementPlanssome items couldbefrom CPAR recommendation) No. Expected Estimated Estimated Start Expected Comments outcome/ cost Duration Date end Date Activity Description 1 TrainingICapacity 3,500,000 24 Months July, June Details inNACA Building 2007 2009 ISACA Workplad Local 1,500,000 Procurement Plans International 2 24 Months June Details inNACA +Workshops July, 400,000 2007 2009 ISACA Workplad +Conferences 200,000 Procurement Plans +Capacity 1,500,000 Building +Training 250,000 +NNRIMS +M&E training 1,300,000 350,000 Total I 4.0mUSD 17 HAFGrant 2007-2009 Procurement No. Expectedoutcome / Estimated Method Estimated Start Comments Activity Description cost Duration Date 1 HAFGrants 17mUSD HAFProcess 24 MonthsJuly, (Various Federal HAF 7m USD (Demand 2007 Methods) State HAF 10mUSD driven) Details in The HIV/AIDS Fund N A C A /SACA (HAF) - Activitiesat Workplad the Federal and State Procurement Levels (34 +FCT) Plans The HIV/AIDS Fundwill provide grants to civil society (non- governmental organizations (NGO), faith based organizations (FBO), umbrella organizations (UM),etc at federal and state levels. Thematic areas will cover the followings: 0 Prevention continuum through behavior change communications Care and support for Orphans and Vulnerable Children ( O W Integration o f ReproductiveHealth and STD into HIV/AIDS programming Integration of income generatingactivities into Care and Support for P L W H M A C A And other related activities on the mitigationof HIV/AIDS 18 SCHEDULEC NIGERIA HIV/AIDSProgrammeDevelopmentProject IndicatorsandProposedChanges IndicatorsinPAD RevisedIndicators Original Baselineand Target 1. Outputsfrom each component A. CapacityDevelopment AIDS National Program Effort Increase in National AIDS National Baseline (2005) - Index(API)i s improved Program Effort Index (API); 62% Target (2009) - 75% Annual HIV/AIDS summitopen to Annual HIV/AIDS summit open to Iper year representatives of civil society and representatives o f public sector, civil external partners and external partners Annually, anational HIV/AIDS -society N o change reDort is-Droduced and disseminated Action plans and contracts are - N o change 100% signed with the implementing Dartners SACAs and SPTs are set up and SACAs are set up and functional, in 100% functional, inrelation to the plan relation to the plan The total numbero f states with - The total number of states with Baseline 2006: 4 functional State Action Committees functional State Action Committees states/25% o f on AIDS (SACA) and State on AIDS (SACA) and Local Action LACAs Program Teams (SPTs) Committees on I A D S (LACA) Target 2009: 36 will be 6 states by December 2001 states/75% o f and 18 states by 2005 LACAs Disbursementsfrom special -No Change Baseline 2006: accounts are timely and processed 75% accurately Target 2009: 100% State AIDS Program Effort Index State AIDS Program Effort Index Baseline 2006: (API)is improved (-@I); 20% Target 2009: 75% Annually, a State HIV/AIDS N o Change summit is convened and a HIVIAIDSreport is producedand disseminated Proposals for financing are -No change Baseline: 90% approved and contracts are signed Target: 100% quicklyand efficiently By June 2002, a HIV/AIDS national National M&E framework finalized Baseline: 75% o f monitoringand evaluation and N A C A reports annually on at indictors framework will be designed and least 75% o f indicators in the Target: 100% o f baseline surveys will be conducted. framework indicators The N A C A and SACAs will N o change- Baseline: 50% prepare a HIV/AIDS situation Target: 100% analysis and assessment o f program 19 performance annually. B. Expandingthe PublicSector Response By July 2002, at least four federal % Ministries, Departments and Baseline:23% line ministries will have adopted Agencies that are implementing Target: - 85% HIV/AIDS plans and are HIV/AIDS workplace policy and implementingthem intheir regular programs intheir regular programs work programs, increasingto 10 line ministries by 2005. C. HIV/AIDS Fundand CommunityMobilization CSOspresent a large numbero f CSOs present at least 30 proposals for Baseline:83% funds for financing financing per year ineach state Target: 100% The proposals are approved and The proposals are approved quickly Baseline:50% implementedquicklyand and according to agreed criteria Target: 100% effectively Output indicators specific to the % o f approved proposals are Baseline:90% proposals improve implemented as planned Target: 100% 2. Impact/Outcome By 2005, the HIVprevalencerate Drop as measured among pregnant women by the sentinel surveillance svstemwould not exceed 8%. Decrease in the percentage o f young Baseline 2005 people aged 15 - 24 who are HIV 4.3% infected Target: 3.2% By2005, the proportion ofmenand Percentage of women and men aged Baseline (2005): women who have reducedthe 15-49 who had sex with more than 13.6% number o f sexual partners in one partner inthe last 12months Target: 3.6% response to perceived riskwouldbe increasedby25% in relation to the baseline survey. By2005, reductioninHIV Percentage o f sex workers who in the Baseline: TBD prevalence among core transmitters past 12 months did not use a condom Target: TBD . (CSW and STDpatients) by 25% in consistently during sexual intercourse relation to the baseline survey. with a client (Source - BSS) By 2005, increase theproportion of % of women and men (disaggregated Baseline (2005): the population aged 15-to-49, who by young people and adults) reporting 54.2% report usinga condom intheir last the use o f condom the last time they Target: 78% act o f sexual intercoursewith a non- had sex with a non-marital, non- regular partner, from 6.5% to 25% cohabiting sexual partner; among women and from 15% to 30% among men. By 2005, increase the medianage at Median age at first sex; Baseline: Male: first intercourse to 17 years o f age 20.1 years; Female: 17.4 years Target: Male: 20.6 years, Female: 17 years 20 Percentage o f orphans and No Change Baseline:15% vulnerable children whose Target: 30% households received free basic external support incaring for the child By 2005, increaseby 20%, in Drop. No good data relation to the baseline, help to households caring for chronically ill householdmembers (young adults). Pregnant women livingwith HIV who Baseline: 30% receive a complete course o f Target: 80% antiretroviral prophylaxis to reduce the risk of MTCT Persons aged 15 and older who Baseline: 8.3% received counseling and testing for Target: 20% HIVandreceivedtheir test results By 2005, 80% ofthe population % o fyoung people aged 15 -24 who Baseline: 84.1% knows how to prevent HIV both can correctly identifyways of Target: 94.1% transmission. preventing the sexual transmission o f HIVandwho rejectmajor misconceptions about HIV transmission; 21 Q