Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized ” 70 ” 1999 12 “ 34 “ 21584 1990 ? 9 1 48 277 573 904 -2- 1988 20 1959 1979 Church, Thomas W. 1982. “The ‘Old and the New’ Conventional Wisdom of Court Delay.” The Justice System Journal 7(3): 395-418. Feeley, Malcolm M. 1983. “Speedy Trial Rules and the Problems of Delay.” In Court Reform on Trial: Why Simple Solutions Fail. New York: Basic Books. Kakalik, James S., and others. 1996. Just, Speedy, and Inexpensive? An Evaluation of Judicial Case Management under the Civil Justice Reform Act. Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation. National Center for State Courts. 1999. Selec- tive Bibliography on Caseflow Management and -3- Delay Reduction. Available at http://www.ncsc.dni.us/is/clrhouse/cfbi b99.htm. Neubauer, David W., Marcia J. Lipetz, Mary Lee Luskin, and John P. Ryan. 1981. Man- aging the Pace of Justice: An Evaluation of LEAA’s Court Delay-Reduction Program. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice. Ostrom, Brian J., and Roger A. Hanson. 1999. Efficiency, Timeliness, and Quality: A New Perspective from Nine State Criminal Trial Courts. Williamsburg, Va.: National Center for State Courts. Posner, Richard A. 1998. “Court Delay and the Caseload Crisis.” In Economic Analy- sis of Law. 5th ed. New York: Aspen Law and Business. Priest, George L. 1989. “Private Litigants and the Court Congestion Problem.” Boston University Law Review 69(2): 527-59. Richard Messick Nan Shuker Nicholas Pace Brian Ostrom Geoffrey Sheperd, 87942, PREMnet Thematic Groups ____________________________________________________________________ (logo translation: ) PREM (http://prem) PREM Sarah Nedolast PREM PREM 87736 34 1999 12 -4- 1 90% 904 75% 573 50% 277 25% 48 90% 167 75% 104 50% 60 25% 48 90% 228 75% 142 50% 61 25% 37 90% 274 75% 174 50% 65 25% 13 Neubauer 1981