Report No: AUS0000061 . Kyrgyz Republic Measuring Seismic Risk {P149630} . {December, 2017} . URS . . . © 2017 The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank doe not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because The World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this work ma be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. Attribution—Please cite the work as follows: “World Bank. {YEAR OF PUBLICATION}. {TITLE}. © World Bank.� All queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to World Bank Publications, The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625; e-mail: pubrights@worldbank.org. This note summarizes the key outputs and achievements under the technical assistance (TA) “Measuring Seismic Risks in the Kyrgyz Republic� (P149630) 1. SUMMARY The technical assistance (TA) project “Measuring Seismic Risks in the Kyrgyz Republic� (P149630) was implemented by the World Bank Disaster Risk Management (DRM) Team in the Europe and Central Asia region, with a total grant budget of US$ 1 million. The primary objective of the TA was to develop of new seismic risk information in Kyrgyz Republic. Specific outcomes were: 1. Development of new information on the risks from seismic in Kyrgyz Republic. 2. Training of national agencies in the communication, use and application of seismic risk information and improving their understanding of how risk information can be improved through time. The outputs discuss: the seismic hazard across the territory of the Kyrgyz Republic; the exposure of residential buildings and transport infrastructure; and the seismic risk (expressed in economic losses and fatalities) facing the country. The final output also summarizes a proposed seismic risk reduction strategy, which provides guidance to the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic and other key stakeholders to priorities a range of risk reduction options that will save lives, reduce damage to critical buildings and infrastructure and reduce the economic losses caused by earthquakes in the Kyrgyz Republic. This work informs the Ministry of Finance (MoF) and the Ministry of Emergency Situations of the greatest priorities and options for disaster mitigation at a macro-level level. This analysis does not provide specific building or infrastructure information or detailed designs for risk reduction (e.g. Retrofitting, strengthening of infrastructure etc.). The project started in February 2014 and completed in December 2017. Project objectives and activities: The development objective of the project was to strengthen disaster risk reduction capacity through seismic risk analysis in Kyrgyz Republic. Outputs of the project: The output of the project is divided into five components: ▪ Component 1: Development of Input datasets for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment. Provided a portfolio analysis of the potential losses from earthquakes to: residential structures dis-aggregated to rayon level (including estimates of mortality and morbidity), public buildings, and national-level transport infrastructure. Analysis of direct loss for a range of frequencies and annual average loss should be provided. Qualitative analysis of the potential impact of seismic events on EHV networks and urban water infrastructure also undertaken. ▪ Component 2: Development of Exposure Datasets and Vulnerability Functions for Seismic Risk Assessment. Collected and Quality Assurance / Quality Checking (QA/QC) earthquake input datasets. This include a cleaned historical earthquake catalogue, seismic sources (fault lines and area sources) that generated events in historical times with information on activity level, depth and traces, other seismic sources (egg. Identified fault lines), strong ground motion records, micro-zonation studies, shear wave analysis, GPS strain measurements, etc. 1 ▪ Component 3: Probabilistic and Scenario-based Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis. A series of up to 12 scenario events (from the stochastic seismic analysis) have been selected in collaboration with the Kyrgyz Government for further elaboration of the impacts of events on residential and government buildings and/or transport. These scenarios also compared with a series of historical events for validation if suitable historical event data is available. ▪ Component 4: Macro-level Seismic Risk Reduction Strategy residential and government buildings and transportation system using results of Cost-Benefit Analysis of 10 disaster risk mitigation measures. ▪ Component 5: Communication and Transmission of Datasets, Analysis, and Results and Final Report. Transmittal of datasets collected, value-added or developed through the Consultancy to the WB and Kyrgyz Republic Government. Communication of the risk results through a workshop, simple brochures and a final report. In additional, all input and value add datasets, hazard, exposure and risk modeling results that are in geospatial format provided to the Kyrgyz Republic Government and WB and added to the Kyrgyz Republic Geonode. The project worked in close partnership with State Agency for Architecture, Construction, and Communal Services (Gosstroi), the Ministry of Emergency Situations (MOES). The Steering committee lead by Gosstroy was set up and through the project several meetings with participation of committee members and key stakeholders, like Ministry of Transport, Health, Education, Statistic committee, Academy of Science took place. The project brought together disaster risk and emergency response practitioners and government officials in a series of meetings and workshops. Results and impact: The Kyrgyz Republic is located in a highly seismic region subjected to devastating earthquakes that have caused loss of life, destroyed homes and ruined livelihoods in historical and recent times. Although earthquakes occur less frequently than other natural hazards such as floods and landslides, they cause the largest proportion of disaster related losses across the country. The seismic risk assessment undertaken as part of this project is being considered by the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic to prioritise a range of risk reduction options that will save lives, and reduce damage and economic losses caused by earthquakes to critical buildings and infrastructure in the Kyrgyz Republic. The expected annual economic losses associated with earthquake damage to all assets classes (residential buildings, schools, transport infrastructure) are large. The results of losses to residential buildings when subjected to scenario earthquake ground shaking results indicate the large economic losses and large number of fatalities that can be expected in several of the scenario earthquakes. The estimated economic losses are in the range of 138 million to 11 billion USD but could be significantly higher (up to 16 billion USD). Fatalities are estimated to be in the range of 200 to 10,300 people but could be significantly higher (up to 19,000 people). The mean number of collapsed residential buildings expected for the scenarios ranges from 1,600 to 19,000. The prediction of damage, as well as monetary and human losses due to potential future earthquake events is a valuable tool for decision-makers and policy makers involved in disaster risk reduction. In the context of emergency response and disaster planning, the prediction of damage to the built environment and main lifelines in a given scenario (e.g. the repetition of a significant historical earthquake) is of particular importance. These results are used by civil protection agencies to assess their level of preparedness, to adjust emergency response plans and resources, and to develop plans towards the reduction of adverse impacts in high risk regions. From an economic perspective, probabilistic seismic risk results are used to inform 2 decisions regarding acceptable risk, as well as strategies for coping with the financial strain of recovery in the effected regions. Seismic Hazard and Risk in the Kyrgyz Republic The Kyrgyz Republic is in a highly seismic region subjected to devastating earthquakes that have caused loss of life, destroyed homes and ruined livelihoods in historical and recent times. Seismic risk quantifies the adverse impacts of seismic events by providing a probability that a level of loss (monetary, human and social loss) will occur in each geographical region over a specific time-frame. Seismic hazard represents the ground shaking that earthquakes can produce at the region of interest, and how frequently these effects are expected to occur. Exposure refers to the assets (e.g. buildings, roads) that are in the areas affected by earthquakes. Vulnerability represents the susceptibility of the exposed elements to suffer damage due to seismic action in the event of an earthquake. Seismic risk is calculated by combining information on seismic hazard with information on the distribution and vulnerability of the population, buildings and infrastructure. In this study, direct earthquake losses due to ground shaking have been quantified for residential buildings, schools, hospitals, fire stations, roads and bridges. Each assessment was performed independently, using exposure and vulnerability models specifically tailored to the characteristics of each group of assets. Seismic risk was calculated following a time-based framework and by considering scenario earthquakes. Time-based assessments account for all the possible earthquakes that can occur in the future, as well as the probability that each one will be experienced by the exposed assets. Time-based risk assessment relies on the results of probabilistic seismic hazard assessments (PSHA), whereby information on past earthquake activity and the tectonic setting of the area are considered, to predict the frequency of occurrence of seismic events of different magnitudes within a specific time frame. Scenario earthquake-based assessments, on the other hand, evaluate the probable performance of buildings and infrastructure when subjected to specific scenario earthquakes (of a given magnitude, occurring at a specific location). As part of this study, seismic hazard and risk calculations were undertaken using two interrelated methods as part of this project: • Scenario earthquake seismic hazard and risk assessments; and • Probabilistic time-based seismic hazard and risk assessments. Scenario earthquake seismic hazard calculations were undertaken for twelve (12) representative scenario earthquake events. These scenarios were selected based on the mapped location of known active geological faults located near to urban centres across the country. The magnitudes used for the scenario earthquake calculations are representative of maximum credible earthquakes that have occurred on these geological faults in historic to recent times. It is emphasised that in the future earthquakes could occur on other geological faults located in other parts of the country. The twelve scenario earthquakes were selected to be representative of the type of earthquake events that could occur. Probabilistic risk calculations were also undertaken as part of this study. The probabilistic time-based risk results show that the Kyrgyz Republic is exposed to a severe level of seismic risk, with expected annual economic losses associated with direct damage to buildings exceeding 280 million USD annually – i.e. over 4% of GDP - and expected annual fatalities of up several hundred. The expected annual economic losses are reported because they provide an estimate of what might occur each year on average and this is useful information for financial planning or insurance purposes. The seismic hazard assessment for the Kyrgyz Republic was undertaken using probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (PSHA) methodology. The main assumption in this methodology is that earthquakes are 3 independent and follow a Poissonian distribution. To ensure consistency with this assumption, the earthquake catalogue was processed, removing foreshocks and aftershocks (seismic events that precede and follow a main shock and are therefore not independent). Exposure Datasets and Vulnerability Functions for Seismic Risk Assessment An exposure model of population, residential buildings, schools, hospitals, fire stations, and roads and bridges infrastructure was developed for the Kyrgyz Republic within this project. The development of this exposure model was constrained by an almost complete lack of official data from the relevant authorities (e.g. roads from the Ministry of Transport, school buildings from the Ministry of Education etc.). Given the paucity of institutional data for residential buildings, alternative methodologies (e.g. statistical models) were used to estimate the spatial distribution of the exposure assets across the country, taking as much as possible advantage of the expertise of local experts. Fragility functions have been developed for buildings and infrastructure for use in the seismic risk calculations in the Kyrgyz Republic. Thirteen building typologies representative of the building stock in the Kyrgyz Republic have been considered, and fragility functions have been developed for each building typology. Fragility functions for roads and bridges have been derived, following state-of-the-practice recommendations available in the international literature. It should be noted that commercial, industrial and sensitive government buildings (such as local and national government buildings, police station buildings and military buildings) have not been considered in the present seismic risk assessment. In addition, critical national infrastructure such as energy facilities, water supply, sewerage facilities, telecommunications facilities were not included in the terms of reference for the project. It is recommended that information on these building and infrastructure assets are compiled for future studies. Only direct fatalities, associated with primary damage to buildings, were calculated within this project. This does not take into consideration the potential for secondary fatalities related to earthquake damage to hospitals whose functionality and ability to treat patients are compromised and cannot treat patients or if emergency personnel are not able to respond after a damaging earthquake event. In addition, fatalities caused from falling masonry parapets, pieces of bearing walls, non-structural wall panels, or falling signs and other elements have not been considered directly in the present risk assessment. This may potentially be a source of underestimation in fatalities. The present seismic risk assessment has assumed a fatality rate of 10% for collapsed buildings (damage state D5) as recommended by FEMA (2003). This assumption does not account for possibility of lower or higher fatality rates, as reported for recent deadly earthquakes, e.g. the L’Aquila earthquake (Ferreira et al., 2011). The adopted fatality rate of 10% could be a potential source of underestimation of fatalities but is considered reasonable for the present study. An earthquake catalogue for the Kyrgyz Republic has been compiled as part of the seismic hazard assessment. The earthquake catalogue is a list of historical and recent earthquakes that have occurred in the region. The earthquake catalogue lists the earthquake’s location, date and time, magnitude and the earthquake depth. There are several different magnitude scales that can be used to describe the size of an earthquake and for consistency the moment magnitude Mw has been used. The earthquake catalogue includes events that cover the territory of the Kyrgyz Republic, as well as an area extending 200 km outside its borders. 4 Probabilistic and Scenario-based Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis The probabilistic time-based risk results show that the Kyrgyz Republic is exposed to a severe level of seismic risk, with expected annual economic losses associated with direct damage to buildings exceeding 280 million USD annually –over 4% of GDP – and expected annual fatalities of several hundred. The expected annual economic losses provide an estimate of the losses that might occur each year on average and this is useful information for financial planning and insurance purposes. Table 1 summarizes the risk results for the probabilistic time-based risk assessment provided in terms of mean expected annual losses (EAL). The mean annual monetary losses associated with earthquake damage to residential buildings are estimated to be in the range of 121 to 265 million USD, while the average annual fatalities are in the range of 96 to 200 fatalities. Table 1. Probabilistic time-based results, Expected Annual Losses (EAL) (mean results). Asset portfolio Economic Losses (EAL) Fatalities (FAL) USD GDP Hospital Buildings 27 to 55 million 0,41% to 0, 84% 3 to 6 School Buildings 6,5 to 11, 4 million 0,10 % to 0, 17% 32 to 54 Fire Station Buildings 1,2 to 2,4 million 0,02 to 0,04 % 1 to 2 Residential Building 121 to 265 million 1,8% to 4,0% 96 to 200 As table shows the mean monetary losses for residential buildings that have a 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years, which corresponds to an average return period of 475 years. The results have been aggregated to the district (rayon) level, and take into consideration the uncertainties associated with these estimates. All risk results presented are for ground conditions provided by the Vs30 model of shear- wave velocity of the shallow sub-surface provided by the United States Geological Survey (USGS). Seismic Risk Reduction Strategy The Government of the Kyrgyz Republic has acknowledged the importance of a comprehensive holistic approach to disaster risk reduction (DRR). The implementation of the Sendai Framework and the coordination of efforts from several governmental agencies has been listed as a strategic goal for the country (UN, 2015). There are several policies and laws which incorporate DRM and DRR into national policy, including the ‘National Strategy for Sustainable Development for the Kyrgyz Republic for the period of 2013 to 2017’ and the ‘Draft 2016-2030 Strategy of the Emergencies Protection of the Kyrgyz Republic’. The recommendations in the present project for seismic risk reduction are aligned with current policy. The key seismic risk reduction recommendations for the Kyrgyz Republic are organized in accordance with the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, an intrastate agreement whose main aim is the reduction of disaster risk and losses in lives, livelihoods and health, and in the economic, social and environmental assets of persons, businesses and countries: • Priority 1 – Understanding Seismic Risk • Priority 2 – Strengthening Disaster Risk Governance • Priority 3 – Investing in Risk Reduction for Improved Seismic Resilience • Priority 4 – Enhancing Preparedness for Earthquake Disasters 5 Detailed seismic risk reduction recommendations developed for key stakeholders in the Kyrgyz Republic. In addition to the urgency to act to reduce seismic risk, the recommendations should give the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic and other stakeholders a sense of ownership for their management of the seismic risk. With help from the government to clarify roles and responsibilities and allocate funding, is now time for the stakeholders to use these results and recommendation to form specific plans and to implement those plans. To effectively do so, stakeholders need to collaborate across sectors, departments and institutions. Information should be open and shared in government managed databases. The Kyrgyz Republic is not alone in being exposed to high seismic risk. Many other countries face similar challenges. Engagement and collaboration with the international community and sharing of solutions should be encouraged and increased. The World Bank and the GFDRR continue to show their commitment to support the Kyrgyz Republic in achieving their development goals and to recognize that disaster risk reduction is a key component of sustainable development. Communication and Transmission of Datasets, Analysis, and Results and Final Report. The significance of the seismic risk facing the Kyrgyz Republic has been communicated to a wide range of Kyrgyz stakeholders (e.g. the Office of the Prime Minister, the Ministry of Emergency Situations, the Ministry of Education etc.), and multilateral donor organisations (e.g. the UNDP, GIZ, UNICEF, WFP, ADB, JICA etc.) over a number of meetings and workshops held in the Kyrgyz Republic. Communication of the risk results took place through a workshops for technical staff and students, meeting with Steering committee members and high officials. On May, 2017 the high-level workshop with participation of Minister of MoES, deputy minister of Transport, Education, Health, Statistic committee, State Insurance Company took place. The findings from these seismic hazard and risk calculations have been used to prepare seismic risk management strategy options, to allow cost-benefit analyses of various retrofit measures to be undertaken, and to allow stakeholders to make informed risk management decisions. All datasets collected during the project implementation period along with final outputs (final report, brochures, Seismic Risk Reduction Strategy, hazard, exposure and risk modeling results etc.)translated into Russian and uploaded to the Kyrgyz Republic Geonode and are available at http://geonode.mes.kg/ 2. ANNEXES Annex 1: Final reports (English and Russian versions for Component 1 to 5 ) Annex 2: Brochures (Russian versions still pending, will follow shortly) Annex 2.1. Impact of Historical Earthquakes in the Kyrgyz Republic Annex 2.2. Seismic Hazard Input Datasets Annex 2.3. Seismic Hazard in the Kyrgyz Republic Annex 2.4. Developing the Seismic Exposure Model Annex 2.5. Development of Fragility Functions Annex 2.6. Seismic Risk in the Kyrgyz Republic Annex 3: Poster on seismic hazard Annex 4: Presentations delivered at the final workshop on communication of results All the digital datasets have been uploaded in the Geonode and One Drive. 6