WPS6211 Policy Research Working Paper 6211 Assessing the Investment Climate for Climate Investments A Comparative Framework for Clean Energy Investments in South Asia in a Global Context Muthukumara Mani The World Bank South Asia Region Disaster Risk Management and Climate Change September 2012 Policy Research Working Paper 6211 Abstract One of the strong messages that came out of the recent stronger incentives for conventional energy than clean United Nations Climate Change conference in Durban energy, and a domestic financial sector not experienced in was that the private sector has to play an important role new technologies. if we are to globally move toward a low carbon, climate With the long-term goal of promoting and accelerating resilient—or “climate compatible�—future. However, the implementation of climate mitigation technologies, private investment will only flow at the scale and pace this study aims to facilitate development of a policy necessary if it is supported by clear, credible, and long- framework for promoting sustainable investment climates term policy frameworks that shift the risk-reward balance for clean energy investments in South Asia and elsewhere. in favor of less carbon-intensive investment. The private A key aspect of the study is also the pilot construction sector also needs information on where to invest in of the Climate Investment Readiness Index for several clean energy in emerging markets, and it needs policy countries. The index is a tool to objectively evaluate support to lower investment risk. Barriers to low carbon the enabling environment for supporting private sector investments often include unclear and inconsistent energy investment in select climate mitigation or low carbon policies, monopoly structures for existing producers, technologies. This paper is a product of the Disaster Risk Management and Climate Change, South Asia Region. It is part of a larger effort by the World Bank to provide open access to its research and make a contribution to development policy discussions around the world. Policy Research Working Papers are also posted on the Web at http://econ.worldbank.org. The author may be contacted at mmani@worldbank.org. The Policy Research Working Paper Series disseminates the findings of work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about development issues. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. The papers carry the names of the authors and should be cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank and its affiliated organizations, or those of the Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. Produced by the Research Support Team Assessing the Investment Climate for Climate Investments A Comparative Framework for Clean Energy Investments in South Asia in a Global Context Muthukumara S. Mani12 Key Words: Climate Change, Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency, Investment Climate, South Asia Sector Boards: Environment, Energy JEL Codes: Q43, Q48, Q54 1 Senior Environmental Economist, Disaster Risk Management and Climate Change, South Asia Sustainable Development Department. I would like to thank Mahesh Sugathan, R.V. Anuradha and Narasimhan Santhanam for their contributions and Vivien Foster, Kirk Hamilton, Sudeshna Ghosh Banerjee and Maria Vagliasindi for their excellent comments and suggestions. This paper is a summary of a broader study undertaken by the South Asia Sustainable Development Department on ―Assessing Investment Climate for Climate Investments: A Comparative Clean Energy Framework for South Asia in a global Context,‖ that will be disseminated separately. The financial support of USAID is gratefully acknowledged. 2 The author can be contacted at mmani@worldbank.org, World Bank-SASDC. Assessing the Investment Climate for Climate Investments A Comparative Framework for Clean Energy Investments in South Asia in a Global Context 1. Introduction Climate risk management is fundamental for preserving and enhancing development progress in many developing countries. Successful mitigation efforts by the global community will reduce the burden of adaptation. At the same time, adaptation to aggravating climate risks, and low-carbon growth options, are often directly linked to national development priorities such as energy efficiency (EE), renewable energy (RE), sustainable livelihoods, and environmental protection; as well as to business opportunities such as strengthening the resilience of infrastructure to climate variability. The South Asia Region (SAR) is highly vulnerable to climate change, due in large part to the highest absolute number of people at risk and the highest incidence of poverty in the world. Climate threats are made all the more severe by a degrading resource base (e.g., damaged and depleted aquifers, degrading forests and soils). While vulnerability to climate change is high, the region has also recently emerged as a contributor to greenhouse gas emissions. Increased energy consumption, fueled by a relatively high economic growth, has been accompanied by rising greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). On average, emissions have risen at about 3.3 percent annually in the region since 1990 – more rapidly than in any other region except the Middle East. With economic growth a priority in all SAR countries, climate action can result in multiple commercial, developmental, and environmental benefits. Lessons from the Clean Energy Investment Framework and many longstanding World Bank and International Finance Corporation (IFC) engagements show that the best entry points for client dialogue and program development on climate change arise from the synergies between development progress and opportunities to invest in EE, renewable energy, and other low-carbon projects. The scope for cost-effective, pro-development investments in EE and, increasingly, RE— especially against the background of impending energy crisis—is particularly broad. The Government of India, for example, is beginning to shift its economic growth strategy to include technology and management options that will reduce GHG generation while maintaining social and economic development objectives. The magnitude of the resources needed to finance access to and implementation of environmentally sound technologies and processes, is such that the bulk must be provided through private sources, with donors and the public sector serving in a catalytic and/or facilitating role. The success of these efforts is highly dependent on countries establishing an enabling environment for private sector investment in climate- friendly technologies and services, and on the development of endogenous capacities to adopt, operate, and maintain these technologies. The private sector will be a key driver of the transition to climate- friendly technologies; and both foreign and domestic investors will base their decisions on their assessment of how risky or difficult it will be to make an investment in a given country using a given technology, and how these risks or difficulties will add to their costs. 2 2. Barriers to Clean Energy Investments Generic Investment Barriers One overarching challenge to attracting private investment in clean technologies is a strong and believable government commitment to changing the trajectory of carbon emissions. Investors also look for political and macroeconomic stability, an educated workforce, adequate infrastructure (transportation, communications, energy), a functioning bureaucracy, rule of law, and a strong financial sector (Cosbey (2008)). Investors also need ready markets for their products and services. If a country restricts foreign investment in its power sector, this will likely affect investments in renewable power generation as well. General economic and trade openness is also important to clean technology investors, who may depend, like investors in many other sectors, on supply chains for goods and services that are globally dispersed. Enabling power producers to access goods and services rapidly, at world market prices, will have an impact on the costs of investment and ultimately on energy costs. A World Bank study (World Bank, 2008) suggests that liberalizing trade can significantly increase the diffusion of clean technologies in developing countries. While liberalization policies may help in gaining access to international technology, the success of technology diffusion in general depends on a range of other enabling factors, particularly the capacity to absorb and improve technologies in the host countries. Trade facilitation measures that help speed up the movement of goods at customs will also favorably impact the clean energy sectors. The presence of sound policies and institutions to promote competition and curb anti-competitive practices, while beneficial to private investment in general, particularly benefit renewable energy investors, as access to networks and the degree of buying power exercised by utilities are important for grid-connected power. Annex I presents some of the key technical and economic drivers of and constraints to private sector investment in the solar, wind, biomass, and small hydro sectors, based on worldwide experience. Clean Energy-specific Investment Barriers There are also a number of barriers specific to clean energy investment. These may include market conditions such as prices for electricity and fossil fuels, or the presence of carbon and energy-related taxes. Market failure both in the innovation as well as diffusion sides to development, deployment and diffusion have been well-documented (See for instance Mallett, Sheridan and Sorrell,S.(2010), Barton (2007) and Kofoed-Wiuff, Sandholt and Marcus-Møller,C (2006)). Countries with binding GHG emissions targets and norms may provide a more favorable and predictable investment environment for RE and EE, as both will be required to meet emissions-related targets, particularly in rapidly growing economies. However, a recent World Bank study (Avato and Coony, 2009) suggests renewed efforts in this area may face significant barriers that impact the ability to develop and deploy promising clean energy options such as (a) uncertain future value of CO2 emissions abatement; (b) provision of a public good being hampered by free-riding across space—countries that free-ride on the mitigation efforts of others; (c) the ―Valley of Death,‖ phenomenon which occurs when promising technologies languish between public and private sector research, development and demonstration (RD&D) efforts in innovation; (d) intellectual property 3 rights (IPRs) issues where the large RD&D investments needed for technical advances in certain clean energy technologies will be undermined by uncertain global IPR protection; (e) subsidies for conventional energy products at both the retail and production levels reduce to below-cost the price with which new energy technologies must compete; and (f) deployment of clean energy and energy efficient technologies is often hampered by trade barriers. The types of such barriers will differ from country to country, a function of the many factors that shape national energy policies, including history, politics, and geography. The opportunities and obstacles will also vary significantly from country to country, and diagnostic studies could help to identify the full range of potential actions that are needed to help make clean energy investment more attractive to both domestic and foreign investors (Figure 1 provides an illustration of differences between generic investments barriers and those that are more specific to climate investments). With the long-term goal of promoting and accelerating the implementation of climate mitigation technologies, this study aims to facilitate development of a policy framework for promoting sustainable investment climates for climate friendly investments in South Asia and elsewhere. The objective is twofold:  Systematic evaluation and comparison of the enabling environments in SAR countries for supporting private sector investment in climate mitigation technologies.3  Creation of a climate investment readiness index (CIRI) for South Asian countries and comparison with other countries globally. CIRI is an attempt to benchmark countries in terms of their preparedness and maturity to move into the arena of climate-friendly investments. The CIRI goes beyond the more country-focused investment climate assessments and first such initiative that covers both renewable energy as well as energy efficiency.4 While the opportunities and obstacles will vary significantly from country to country, the new policy framework and CIRI will help country-level policymakers to identify the full range of actions needed to make clean energy investment more attractive to both domestic and foreign investors. The index will also help these policymakers understand the institutional, regulatory, and legislative systems that need strengthening; how deficiencies in these systems may impede the flow of private investment in climate-friendly technologies; and the potential impact of various actions. The index will also aid countries in assessing their progress toward a low-energy/carbon growth path, and inform assistance and cooperative efforts. 3 While a number of other sectors such as transportation, agriculture, and forestry are also crucial from the perspective of attracting climate-friendly investments, the study focuses on the RE and EE sectors, because these are the sectors where private sector investment activity is particularly strong. Further investments in these sectors could also improve the investment climate for, e.g., clean transportation technologies such as electric vehicles. 4 There are other similar initiatives underway that attempt to capture/benchmark countries progress towards climate mitigation or clean energy policies and measures. Notable among them are IADB/Bloomberg‘s ClimateScope, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEE) report ranking countries on energy efficiency and World Energy Congress (WEC) Energy Policy Index, and EBRD‘s CLIM Index. 4 Figure 1. Determinants of Climate Investments (Renewable Power and Energy Efficiency) vs. Other Investments GENERIC DETERMINANTS Climate Investments Power Investments Other Investments Overall Political and Macroeconomic Variables Political and macroeconomic stability; Availability and quality of infrastructure; Ready markets and availability of skilled labor; Pro-competition regulation; Coordinated and streamlined licensing and permitting; Ease of entry and exit; Generally applicable tax holidays and incentives. Energy-related Environmental Regulation Energy taxes on fossil-fuels; CO2 tax; Binding GHG emission targets. Electricity and Energy Market Variables Electricity market prices; provisions that allow entry of IPPs; Un- bundling of transmission and distribution functions; Clear and transparent rules for grid access; Provisions to facilitate grid access; Ability to sell to more than one buyer (open access); Markets for power trading. PRIs specific to renewable energy and energy efficiency (including to reduce revenue and cost risk): RE targets, Feed- in tariffs, RPOs, Energy-efficiency standards, RE tax and fiscal incentives and subsidies. Facilitating operations in RE and EE project cycle (speedy and streamlined): Procedures and agencies required for clearances, access to finance. 5 Further, the quantitative data and benchmarking provided by the index can help to stimulate policy debate, by exposing potential challenges and identifying where policymakers might look for lessons and good practices. These data also could provide a basis for analyzing how different policy approaches and reforms could contribute to broader desired outcomes in addition to climate mitigation, such as competitiveness, growth, and greater employment and incomes. The framework for promoting climate investment will: 1. provide valuable information to help guide and target private sector investment in clean energy and energy efficiency in developing countries; 2. help developing country policymakers to better understand the key elements of their enabling environments, as well as barriers to investment that need to be addressed. The study lays out the findings for SAR—India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal, and Maldives— including a review of the policy landscape (policies, regulations, and incentives) for renewable energy and energy efficiency in the countries as well as key issues and challenges highlighted during the consultations with private sector actors in the region. CIRI index scores for select South Asian countries, based on the presence or absence of these policies, regulations and incentives, are then compared with index scores for a mix of countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America. The comparison includes both high GHG-emitting countries and those that have proactively introduced policies, regulations and incentives for renewable energy and energy efficiency. 3. An Overview of Policy, Regulatory and Institutional Frameworks and Private Perceptions for Climate Investments in South Asia The presence of a sound institutional and regulatory framework is a basic prerequisite for countries wishing to attract investment in RE. The lack of a level competitive playing field for private investment in sustainable energy typically implies that governments will need to intervene by means of sustainable energy policies, including financial incentives. Policies that help lower the cost for RE (including the cost of grid-related equipment and associated technologies) will increase the possibilities for scaling up deployment of sustainable energy. Similarly regulations, standards, and incentives that promote greater diffusion of energy-efficient products and construction practices in buildings will encourage greater deployment of energy-efficient products. Comprehensive RE and EE regulatory frameworks are relatively new developments in the South Asian context, although there may have been specific policies and incentives governing individual sectors (such as wind in India since the mid-1980s). Their relatively recent introduction means that their implications for attracting investment will take some time to be understood. A number of laws and regulations also exist in draft form or are pending approval before the cabinet or parliament, particularly in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Maldives, and further policies, regulations and incentives can be expected to evolve. Box 1 gives an overview of existing policies, regulations, incentives and institutions. 6 Box 1: An Overview of Policies, Regulations, Incentives and Institutions Policies , Regulations India has the largest number of national-level policies, regulations and and Incentives incentives, covering all key RE sectors as well as EE. There are also a large number of state-level schemes. India uses sophisticated policy instruments such as RPOs and RECs for renewable energy; as well as a proposed market- based mechanism, a perform, achieve, and trade (PAT) scheme for EE. Pakistan has prescribed preferential tariffs for wind power, co-generation and small hydro projects, but not for solar or grid-connected biomass. Sri Lanka has preferential tariffs for for electricity produced from mini- hydro, wind, biomass (dendro ), biomass (agriculture and industrial waste), municipal waste, and waste heat recovery; however, the country as yet has no such tariffs for solar production. Bangladesh, Nepal and Maldives still do not have specific legislation for either grid-connected RE or EE. Institutions (for RE) India has a dedicated Ministry for New and Renewable Energy (MNRE). The Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency (IREDA) is the financing arm of the MNRE, which secures funds to be provided as grants or loans to end-users, manufacturers and entrepreneurs. Apart from MNRE, other significant institutions include central and state electricity regulatory commissions, which are responsible for tariff setting, sale and distribution of electricity; National Load Dispatch Centres at the central level; state agencies to regulate RECs; and power exchanges where these certificates are traded. Pakistan’s Alternative Energy Development Board (AEDB), under the Ministry of Water and Power, plays a similar role in RE development. The other key RE institution is the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (NEPRA). Additionally, Pakistan has state-level agencies that support implementation of RE policies either on their own or in collaboration with AEDB. The Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) is in charge of hydro power development. Sri Lanka Sustainable Energy Authority (SLSEA), established pursuant to the Sri Lanka Sustainable Energy Authority Act of 2007, functions as a part of the Ministry of Power and Environment. It has the authority to issue permits for on-grid and off-grid RE projects for the generation and supply of power. The Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) was established by Act No. 35 of 2002 as a multi-sector regulator of certain physical infrastructure industries in the country, and plays a key role in RE development in Sri Lanka. The Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) also plays an important role, as the entity that enters into power purchase agreements with 7 RE developers. In Bangladesh, Nepal and Maldives units or departments dedicated to RE policymaking or financing are still in the process of being established. Bangladesh Power Development Board (BPDB), however, has been playing a significant role in the commissioning of RE projects in the wind and solar sectors. Also, the Infrastructure Development Company Limited (IDCOL), licensed as a non-banking financial institution, has played a significant role in bridging the financing gap for medium and large-scale infrastructure and RE projects Institutions (for EE) India’s EE efforts are coordinate by the Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE). Pakistan’s National Energy Conservation Centre (ENERCON) is responsible for EE. In Sri Lanka, EE efforts are headed by the Sri Lanka Sustainable Energy Authority. Bangladesh, Nepal and Maldives have no specific institutions to administer EE initiatives. In Bangladesh, the Power Division, Ministry of Power, Energy and Mineral Resources and Bangladesh Power Development Board (BPDB) have been undertaking a series of measures designed to improve EE. In Maldives, the draft Maldives Energy Bill 2010 proposes to establish a National Energy Efficiency Division within the Energy Department for promotion of EE measures. Private Sector Perceptions of the Existing Policy, Regulatory and Incentive Framework in South Asia The existence of regulatory frameworks and incentives for RE and EE may not, by itself, lead to perceptions of an attractive investment climate. In addition to broader macroeconomic variables such as infrastructure, the availability of skilled labor, and market size, the effective implementation of existing laws and regulations is also important. Regardless of what exists on paper, investors need to get a sense from those actually involved in the business of producing and selling renewable power about the issues and challenges they face in a country. Outlined below are the results from consultations held with private sector stakeholders —firms active in RE generation; select vertically integrated firms active in both power generation and manufacturing; and manufacturers and distributors of RE equipment—in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. Due to time constraints and the diversity of the sector, similar consultations were not carried out with distributors of EE equipment; this could be done as part of a future study. 8 Cross-cutting factors The consultations revealed a broad range of critical factors—the ―ten Cs‖—that investors see as critical for doing climate business in every country. These are described below. Country-specific issues and challenges revealed by the consultations are discussed in the following section.  Clarity and Coherence. Policies/laws on clean energy should be very clear and transparent as well as coherent. They should send a strong signal about the country‘s intention to move toward cleaner/low carbon energy options.  Consistency. Policies have to be consistently implemented across sectors and regions of a country. In a federal structure, for example, the national standard should guarantee a minimum level of RE development, with states being allowed to set more aggressive targets if needed.  Commitment and Credibility. For policies to be credible, governments should signal a long- term commitment to the RE sector, backed by a comprehensive and transparent regulatory and tariff structure.  Clearances. Investors are often discouraged by the number of clearances required to set up, for example, a wind or solar farm. The approval process can be eased considerably by setting up a single-window clearance system or a no-objection based approval process for specific sectors.5  Capacity. As countries ambitiously expand their clean energy portfolios, the capacity of agencies should be enhanced to ensure compliance with targets, policies and regulations.  Compliance. Investors often are concerned about utilites‘ commitment to comply with PPAs. It is therefore important to establish transparent cost recovery rules and prudency tests for utility compliance with policies and contractual arrangements. It also necessary to ensure utilities‘ compliance with any obligations they may have to purchase RE or RE certificates.  Coordination. Coordination across the multitude of agencies involved in the clean energy sector (regulatory agencies, implementing agencies, utilities, distribution companies, etc.) is critical to ensure that clean energy policies are implemented consistently and efficiently.  Collateral. Banks are often reluctant to finance clean energy projects because of concerns about the bankability of the PPAs, which are often related to utilities‘ compliance. Until clean energy becomes as competitive as conventional energy, countries should consider specialized vehicles or institutions that could ensure adequate clean energy financing and help to mitigate risk.  Connectivity. Access to the grid is an important criterion for investment in the renewable energy sector. Investors look for transparent rules, procedures and standards for grid connectivity for the energy they produce.  Cartography. Since the quality and availability of RE (wind, solar, hydro, biomass) varies across locations, the accurate mapping of potential sites will have a bearing on returns to investment. 5 . Such a process would require officials to explicitly reject an application and provide written explanations for the reasons they did so; unless rejected, an application would automatically be considered approved. (See Unleashing the Potential of Renewable Energy in India, South Asia Energy Unit Sustainable Development Department and ESMAPThe World Bank, 2010.) 9 Country-specific factors Many of the country-specific issues that emerged from the consultations can also be categorized under the ten Cs. India Attractive project financing options and terms and conditions are required. The availability of finance emerged as an important issue in India. Smaller firms pointed to difficulties obtaining project-specific financing, while larger firms had the option of using balance-sheet financing (owing to their large capital base or assets held in non-RE related sectors). According to some firm representatives, rates of interest and loan tenures (both important determinants of a project‘s IRR), could be better. Given that most RE costs are upfront costs, the availability of financing mechanisms and options, including direct subsidies and grants that could alleviate such costs, are seen as desirable. Also mentioned was the need to make the Clean Development Mechanism more easily accessible and less administratively cumbersome. A federal system of governance creates opportunities as well as challenges. Solar PV firms pointed to the diversity of taxes on solar equipment from state to state, some of which were considered burdensome. State-level enforcement of RPOs was also an issue, as were timely payments by state electricity boards. On the other hand, federalism has helped create space for regulatory autonomy, which has enabled some states to move faster than others in terms of providing investors with access to land and clearances. The states of Rajasthan and Gujarat in India were noted for their efforts to facilitate investments in solar energy while the state of Himachal Pradesh was noted for its support of small hydro. Access to both data and grids is vital. Renewable power firms require access to grids to enable easy evacuation of power generated from all renewable sources. A clear and predictable policy regarding grid access was seen as essential if firms are to meet their responsibilities to construct and maintain such facilities, as well as negotiate rights of way for transmission lines with third parties, when required. For wind and solar, access to reliable data on wind speeds and solar radiation would enable firms to select locations that provide maximum return on investment. Such data would also enable investors to more accurately estimate revenue streams, which is essential for obtaining project financing from commercial banks. Technology costs are important, but so is performance. Power generation firms place a great deal of importance on cost-effective technology, whether domestically produced or imported. They also emphasize the need for stable and durable performance—a factor that is vital to calculating revenue streams and to winning the confidence of commercial banks still unsure about renewable technologies (primarily solar), which have not been widely tested under Indian conditions. The investors also noted, in relation to wind, that the prevailing cap on generation-based incentives penalizes firms that use the most efficient technology, as they reach the cap sooner due to their higher productivity. Some suggested that incentives could be designed to benefit the most efficient and productive firms. There were also concerns about ensuring the quality of equipment. Power generation firms would like the freedom to procure the best and most cost-effective equipment globally. However, some domestic manufacturing firms expressed concern about unfair competition from certain countries, 10 and argued that given a bit of breathing space, Indian manufacturers could emerge as cost-effective producers of most RE technologies. Transparency and good governance are essential but not always present. Some firms alluded to non- transparency in the bidding and allotment process, and in issuing clearances and in loan disbursements. In certain cases, firms with no prior experience in delivering solar projects have been selected simply because they submitted the lowest bids. Investors also see the need for greater clarity on the proposed value-added tax (VAT), since it has the potential to neutralize the tax benefits given to RE firms. Streamlining the onerous clearance process would also facilitate the reduction of improper practices. On the issue of transparency, investors said they welcomed initiatives, such as the JNNSM, which provide open access to detailed data necessary for siting and estimation of revenues. Easy access to land and the need for government to control speculative land grabbing emerged as an issue for some investors. Certain states fared better than others in facilitating access to land for RE projects, with Gujarat being a notable example. Sri Lanka The focus of the consultations in Sri Lanka was on net metering and the potential for grid-connected solar projects Grid-connected solar has been in place since 2007, through net metering, which is still at a nascent stage. The approach does not involve actual payments to a supplier into the grid. Instead, excess solar energy produced by a captive user can be fed into the grid, and the value is offset against the consumer‘s electricity bills. Financing is essential for deployment of net metering: Net metered projects are not eligible for RERED funding or grants.6 Investors flagged this as a significant shortcoming, since borrowing from commercial banks carries a high interest rate. They emphasized the need for incentives and subsidies for net metered projects. Clarity, consistency and speedy clearances are required for effective operationalization of net metering. Firms involved in the consultations pointed to a lack of clarity—and lack of commitment on the part of utilities—concerning the procedures for establishing net metering. While one of the two transmission companies in Sri Lanka—the Ceylon Electricity Board—seems to have indicated that credits will be carried forward for 10 years, the second company—Lanka Electric Company (LECO)—has indicated that the credits will lapse after a shorter period. There also is no mechanism to allow for utilities to pay producers for accumulated credits. Further, the time required to obtain relevant permits and clearances is unnecessarily long. Financing and policy predictability are both essential for the success of grid-connected solar parks. There was a general perception that the Government‘s efforts to attract private sector investment through the establishment of solar parks would be ineffective without appropriate financing schemes and other incentives. Many firms also suggested that the Government should not establish preferential tariffs, but 6 The Renewable Energy for Rural Economic Development (RERED) Project. It is a market based Project of the Government of Sri Lanka (GOSL) supported with financial assistance from the World Bank and Global Environment Facility, and implemented by DFCC Bank. The RERED Project aims to expand the commercial provision and utilization of renewable energy resources, with a focus on improving the quality of life in rural areas by using electricity as a means to further income generation and social service delivery. Source: http://www.energyservices.lk/ 11 that allowing tariffs to be negotiated between producers and the utilities would be more conducive to private investment. Pakistan A number of private sector firms praised the efforts of the Government of Pakistan to create an attractive investment climate for RE producers. However, they called for more effective implementation of existing laws and regulations and greater transparency. Many of the issues faced by Pakistani firms echo those in India and Sri Lanka, such as access to easy financing options and effective implementation of laws and regulations. However, one distinct issue that arose repeatedly during the consultations was that Pakistan‘s unstable political and security climate is driving away potential investors—despite one of the most attractive terms and conditions offered by any government in South Asia, notably a guaranteed rate of return of nearly 18 percent. Several firms called for some sort of international political and security risk guarantee mechanism to be provided by international institutions. Existing laws need to be effectively implemented. A major problem facing RE firms in Pakistan is the weak implementation of RE laws and regulations. For instance, while feed-in tariffs for various RE sources exist on paper, in actual practice, tariffs are set through a process of negotiations between the relevant authorities and power companies. Administrative costs need to be reduced. RE in Pakistan comes under the purview of a number of agencies. In certain sectors such as small hydro, the entrepreneur has to obtain both provincial and federal-level clearances and the lack of efficient coordination among these agencies leads to delayed implementation and increases administrative burdens and costs for the entrepreneur. There was also a need for speedier, less political process of obtaining clearances. Private sector groups have suggested the creation of a single agency—the Energy Administration Authority (EAA)—and this needs to be pursued. Difficulties in obtaining finance. Access to finance was also mentioned as very important, especially in sectors such as solar PV, where initial investment is high. Many firms find it very difficult to obtain easy access to finance. More concessional loans were suggested, particularly for smaller players. Cost-effective access to both land and equipment is critically important. Access to land remains a serious constraint to investment. Most land is controlled by the provincial governments, and none has a system in place for allocating land to the private sector at cost-effective rates. Private land is also quite expensive. Investors also noted the need for cost-effective access to equipment and inputs. For wind, as there is no manufacturing in Pakistan, customs duties are zero for wind equipment. But for solar cells and modules, prevailing duties continue to be high—up to 50 percent—which raises investment costs for solar PV producers. For biomass, opportunities to facilitate imports and technology transfer from India needs to be explored, with institutions such as the World Bank playing a facilitating role. Bangladesh Clear and supportive policies are needed. Firms in Bangladesh highlighted the need for a clear set of laws and enabling framework to realize effective deployment of RE. So far such clarity has been missing. There is, for instance, no law on net metering, which would encourage rooftop solar. The Government recently issued an order making it mandatory for new residential and commercial establishments to install 12 solar panels as a condition for securing an electricity connection. While the aim is laudable, the initiative lacks supportive aspects, such as financial help for installation costs, which are likely to be more effective. RE investors must keep in mind the agrarian nature of the country’s economy. Most of the projects in Bangladesh are off-grid in nature, as the existing grid cannot meet rising energy demand. Given the largely agrarian and rural nature of the economy, RE opportunities are primarily in applications such as water pumping, which presently rely on expensive diesel generators, given the intermittent electricity supply. Access to finance is still a difficult issue for small-scale projects. Non-profit organizations are an important vehicle for RE technology diffusion in Bangladesh, given their involvement in micro-credit and the small-scale, off-grid nature of RE deployment in most of the country. Commercial interest rates are typically in the range of 11-14 percent for RE projects, although the Government sometimes provides loans at lower rates for the purchase of capital equipment. Institutional actors such as Asian Development Bank and World Bank are active in efforts to expand RE deployment of RE, although it was noted that large institutional actors are interested mainly in large-scale projects. A programmatic approach with clustering of similar projects was suggested so that smaller private sector players can benefit from these institutional efforts. There is a need to establish and scale up local manufacturing and technological collaboration. Some firms pointed to current efforts to manufacture the hardware required for RE deployment, such as batteries and charge controllers. Bangladesh would benefit from technology transfer and private sector collaboration with countries such as India, which are more advanced in this area. Indian companies are already actively involved in areas of RE technology deployment such as solar-powered mobile towers. Nepal Given the relatively nascent and off-grid nature of solar, wind, and biomass in Nepal, consultations with the private sector focused on the small hydro sector. One issue that was interesting from a regional energy trade perspective is hydropower exports to India. Private sector firms generally felt that easier access to the Indian market would lead to the rapid scale-up of hydro sector investments in Nepal. Nepal could then import power from India during the dry season, and export surplus power during the wet season much more than the presently insignificant levels of trade, leading to a ‗win-win‘ situation for both countries. However, they were concerned that large hydro would benefit from this access much more than small hydro, given the high fixed costs (including transmission lines) of installations that could supply the Indian market. Lack of transmission facilities is a serious constraint to investment in grid-connected small hydro projects. Delayed clearances are often an issue due to lack of coordination among various government departments. The process is presently streamlined, for smaller projects of less than 50MW, for which only a simple environmental impact assessment (EIA) is needed, compared to the full range of environmental clearances required for larger projects. 13 Capacity specifications can be a burden. The Nepal Electricity Authority buys all the power produced by plants of less than 25MW, provided that they generate at full capacity at least 40 percent of time (i.e., Q40 plants). Firms expressed concern that during the wet season, unless the surplus power generated can be exported, it will be wasted, and producers will incur a loss. Developers are also concerned that, in the absence of a larger market, the Q40 requirement means the plants cannot be designed to optimize costs. Access to equipment and inputs for small hydro projects was perceived to be largely free of barriers. The zero VAT and one percent customs duty were considered attractive, as were the 7 to 10-year tax holidays. Only construction materials incur a duty, and the government could help small hydro firms by reducing or eliminating this as well. 4. Constructing a Climate Investment Readiness Index (CIRI) The study undertook a comparative assessment of the investment environment for grid-connected renewable energy and energy efficiency in a select group of South Asian and comparator countries. The objective was to determine whether these countries have policies, regulations, and incentives designed to attract investments in RE generation and EE, at least on paper, and how they rank when compared with each other. The indicators selected were based on an extensive survey of literature on some of the main policies, regulations and incentives introduced by countries to attract private sector investment in RE, as well as enable greater diffusion of EE products and techniques as indicated in Section 3. The selected indicators are illustrated in Boxes 2 and 3. The lists are by no means exhaustive, but they do provide a fair indication of some of the key elements that a country needs to have in place to give a clear signal to private investors. For both RE and EE, two types of indicators were selected. The first comprised cross-cutting policies, regulations and incentives that would broadly affect the investment climate in renewables or EE. The second category included policies, regulations and incentives specific to a sector, such as solar PV or small hydro (for renewables) or lighting and appliances (for EE). For RE, each indicator was assigned a weight of 1, and the weighted score for each indicator was found by multiplying the score for presence or absence. Thus, in the presence of an indicator, the weighted CIRI score (WS) would be: (POLICIES, REGULATIONS AND INCENTIVES Score =1) X (Assigned Weight=1) == = 1 In the absence of an indicator, the weighted CIRI score (WS) would be: (POLICIES, REGULATIONS AND INCENTIVES Score =0) X (Assigned Weight=1) ==POLICIES, REGULATIONS AND INCENTIVES = 0 A slightly different approach to scoring has been followed for policies, regulations and incentives for EE. As one of the indicators—namely, mandatory minimum energy performance standards (MEPS) and labeling initiatives—is a function of the number of appliances covered by such initiatives, there is no maximum ceiling and no absolute total score. Mandatory standards are obviously much more important than voluntary standards for creating a climate that is conducive for the diffusion of EE appliances. If similar scores were given for both mandatory as well as voluntary standards, then country A, for instance, could enjoy a high total CIRI score if it had a large number of appliances covered by voluntary standards 14 and none under mandatory standards, whereas it may actually be country B that has a more attractive investment climate due to the presence of mandatory standards. To reinforce the importance of mandatory standards for lighting, appliances, and building codes, mandatory labeling schemes or minimum energy performance standards are given a scoring weight of 2. Thus for the presence of a single mandatory standard in lighting, a country would receive a score of 1 and a weight of 2, giving it a weighted score of 2. If there are 7 mandatory standards, the country would get a score of 7 and a weighted score of 14. For the presence of voluntary standards in lighting, by contrast, a country would get a weighted score of 1 per standard, so that 1 standard would yield a score of 1, for example, and 7 standards would yield a weighted score of 7. The resulting total score for each country has been taken as the CIRI consolidated score for EE sectors in the country. The consolidated score reflects the overall regulatory attractiveness of a country. However, it does not indicate the effective implementation of these policies, regulations and incentives, or how the private sector may view them; nor does it capture the geographical and sectoral scale or financial depth of individual EE schemes or projects that may exist in any country. Renewable Energy For renewable energy, the decision was made to focus on grid-connected electric power generation, as this is the focus of activity in both developed and developing countries, and thus provides easier comparability. Certain indicators, such as RE targets and tax incentives on equipment purchases, are relevant for the expansion of both grid-connected and off-grid RE; but otherwise the two are quite different in terms of the policies, regulations and incentives that matter for attracting investment. The availability of equipment financing schemes and other consumer subsidies, in fact, matter much more in the case off-grid RE, since they are often targeted at poor communities in remote areas untouched by the electricity grid network. Box 2: Key Indicators for Construction of CIRI RE c Cross-cutting Indicators 1 Existence of RE Policy and Law  RE Policy  RE Law 2 Existence of RE Target 3 RE Purchase/Offtake Obligation 4 Availability of Tradable Instruments for RE Sector Specific Indicators for Solar PV, Wind, Biomass and Small Hydro 1 Preferential tariffs for Solar/Wind/Biomass/Small Hydro 2 Grants/Subsidies/Incentives related to capital/Investment Tax Credits 15 3 Incentives Linked to Generation/Production tax-credits 4 Income Tax Holidays/Exemptions 5 Trade-related Incentives  Customs Duty Exemptions  Absence of Local Content Requirements 6 Other Tax Exemptions (VAT, Excise etc) An examination of the presence or absence of these policies, regulations and incentives in South Asia reveals that India, as expected, scores high for the presence of both cross-cutting and sector-specific policies, regulations and incentives. Only in wind does Pakistan score above India, due to Pakistan‘s income tax holidays. India is the only country that has deployed tradable instruments to facilitate entities‘ obligation to purchase RE. Pakistan scores higher than Sri Lanka for the presence of policies, regulations and incentives in all sectors. A higher CIRI score, however, does not mean that a country is attracting higher levels of investment or even that it offers a better climate for RE investors. It merely indicates that a country has put in place more policies, regulations and incentives to attract investors. Whether this contributes to creating a more attractive investment climate depends on a number of other factors, including effective implementation. As the findings from the private sector consultations reveal, many investors, particularly foreign firms, are still hesitant to invest in Pakistan owing to the prevailing political and security climate, despite the offer of very attractive terms and conditions. Hence, the binary nature of CIRI analysis reveals just one side of the story. As discussed earlier it needs to be complemented with surveys of private sector to get a complete picture. The tables below indicate the existence or absence of policies, regulations and incentives for grid- connected RE investment in India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. Scores are on a scale of 10 (which indicates the presence of key RE policies, regulations and incentives). The presence of an indicator gives a country a score of 1 and its absence a score of zero. Equal weights (carrying a value of 1) have been assumed for each indicator set. One can, in principle, change the weights of various categories to arrive at a revised scoring scheme. However, care must be taken to ensure that the weighting schemes are consistent with private sector perceptions of the policies, regulations and incentives. As noted earlier, Nepal, Bangladesh and Maldives have not been included in the scoring due to their emphasis on off-grid deployment and relatively underdeveloped state of grid-connected RE, as well as the absence of required policies, regulations and incentives. 16 Table 1a: Cross-cutting Grid-Connected RE Policy, Regulation and Incentives: CIRI Scores for India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka Cross-cutting Grid-Connected CIRI India Pakistan Sri Lanka Indicators 1 Existence of Law and Policy on Renewable 1 1 1 Energy a Existence of RE Policy 0.5 0.5 0.5 b Existence of RE Law 0.5 0.5 0.5 2 Existence of RE Target 1 1 1 3 Obligation for Designated Entities to 1 1 1 Purchase/Off-take RE 4 Availability of Tradable Instruments for RE 1 0 0 Generation Total 4 3 3 Table 1b: Solar PV-Grid-Connected RE Policy, Regulation and Incentives: CIRI Scores for India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka Grid-connected Solar PV CIRI Indicators India Pakistan Sri Lanka 1 Availability of Designated Preferential Tariffs 1 0 0 for Solar PV Power 2 Grants, subsidies and incentives related to 1 1 0 capital/Investment tax credits 3 Incentives linked to generation/Production 1 0 0 tax-credits 4 Income-tax holidays/exemptions 1 1 1 5 Trade-related Incentives 0.5 1 1 -Customs-duty exemptions (zero duty on major 0.5 0.5 0.5 components and equipment) -Absence of ‘local-content’ requirements for 0 0.5 0.5 17 power producers 6 Other tax-exemptions (Sales, VAT, Energy 1 1 0 Tax etc) Total 5.5 4 2 Table 1c: Onshore Wind-Grid-Connected RE Policy, Regulation and Incentives: CIRI Scores for India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka Onshore Wind India Pakistan Sri Lanka Grid-Connected CIRI Indicators 1 Availability of Designated Preferential Tariffs 1 1 1 for Onshore Wind Power 2 Grants, subsidies and incentives related to 1 0 0 capital/Investment tax credits 3 Incentives linked to generation/Production 1 1 0 tax-credits 4 Income-tax holidays/exemptions 0 1 1 5 Trade-related Incentives 0.5 1 1 -Customs-duty exemptions (zero duty on major 0 0.5 0.5 components and equipment) -Absence of ‘local-content’ requirements for 0.5 0.5 0.5 power producers 6 Other tax-exemptions (Sales, VAT, Energy 1 1 1 Tax etc) Total 4.5 5 4 18 Table 1d: Small-Hydro Grid-Connected RE Policy, Regulation and Incentives: CIRI Scores for India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka Small-hydro India Pakistan Sri Lanka weighted score Grid-Connected CIRI Indicators 1 Availability of Designated Preferential Tariffs 1 1 1 for Small-hydro Power 2 Grants, subsidies and incentives related to 1 0 0 capital/Investment tax credits 3 Incentives linked to generation/Production 0 1 0 tax-credits 4 Income-tax holidays/exemptions 1 1 1 5 Trade-related Incentives 0.5 1 0.5 -Customs-duty exemptions (zero duty on major 0 0.5 0 components and equipment) -Absence of ‘local-content’ requirements for 0.5 0.5 0.5 power producers 6 Other tax-exemptions (Sales, VAT, Energy 1 0 0 Tax etc) Total 4.5 4 2.5 Table 1e: Biomass Grid-Connected RE Policy, Regulation and Incentives: CIRI Scores for India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka Biomass India Pakistan Sri Lanka Grid-Connected CIRI Indicators 1 Availability of Designated Preferential Tariffs 1 0 1 for Biomass Power 2 Grants, subsidies and incentives related to 1 0 0 capital/Investment tax credits 3 Incentives linked to generation/Production 0 0 0 tax-credits 4 Income-tax holidays/exemptions 1 1 1 19 5 Trade-related Incentives 0.5 1 0.5 -Customs-duty exemptions (zero duty on major 0 0.5 0 components and equipment) -Absence of ‘local-content’ requirements for 0.5 0.5 0.5 power producers 6 Other tax-exemptions (Sales, VAT, Energy 1 1 0 Tax etc) Total 4.5 3 2.5 Consultations with the private sector in South Asia, as well as existing literature on the subject, reveal that the two elements most critical for attracting private sector investment in RE are the attractiveness and stability of the power purchase tariff (i.e., a preferential tariff and the length of time for which it will be available, to allow for more stable returns). Perceptions of what constitutes an attractive tariff will vary from country to country, depending on local investment costs and conditions. In addition to stability of the power purchase tariff, other critical elements include some assurance that the RE generated will be purchased, as well as accelerated depreciation and other investment-related incentives that reduce upfront investment costs. Policy stability is also necessary to make calculations of returns on investment more predictable. An unpredictable policy environment (where PRIs are altered or dropped without warning) will not be attractive to private investors. The CIRI score tables above do not attempt to measure the degree of stability in policies, regulations and incentives, which can be gauged only through private sector interactions and detailed surveys in each country context. As a general rule, however, longer time-frames for maintaining policies, regulations and incentives (for preferential tariffs, firms often cite at least 20 years) is a good indicator of policy stability. As many countries in the developing world, including in South Asia have only recently started introducing policies, regulations and incentives, it may take a while before the degree of stability can be properly ascertained. Comparative Analysis of Renewable Energy CIRI Scores for South Asia and Other Countries How does South Asia fare in terms of the presence of RE policies, regulations and incentives compared with countries outside the region? As it can be seen in Annex II, in sectors such as onshore wind, countries with a very good record in installed wind power capacity, such as China and India, come out with high scores. However, a number of European countries with a good wind power presence, such as Spain, UK and the Netherlands, score lower than, for example, the Philippines. This trend of traditionally dominant countries scoring lower than new comers is also seen in other RE sectors, such as solar PV. One obvious reason for this counterintuitive finding is that a number of countries have geographical advantages for certain RE resources such as solar and wind, as well as an attractive market in terms of population numbers with a certain purchasing power capacity. Countries that may not have these advantages or are new entrants may need to offer significant incentives to make it worthwhile for the private sector to establish a presence, until the market develops and the costs of RE deployment come down. 20 In terms of the presence of cross-cutting framework elements, India is in the same category as Asian countries that have put in place overarching RE policies and laws, including China, Indonesia, Japan, Philippines, Indonesia and Kazakhstan, as well as the major economies of Europe, Australia, Mexico and South Africa. For solar and wind-specific policies, regulations and incentives, India and Pakistan‘s CIRI scores are comparable to those of China, Vietnam and Philippines in East Asia. India, in fact, scores higher than most countries in Europe, Latin America and Africa for solar-specific policies, regulations and incentives; and India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka all score higher than most European, Latin American and African countries as well as Australia for wind-specific policies, regulations and incentives. These findings highlight the fact that countries with lower sector-specific CIRI scores may fall into either more mature markets (as in Europe) that need to rely on fewer incentives to attract wind investments; or else immature or very early-stage markets that have not yet developed investment incentives. Rapidly growing and emerging countries generally reflect higher sector-specific CIRI scores. A higher score can also reflect recognition by pro-active policymakers of the potential of renewables and their desire to attract investment as quickly as possible. The Philippines is a notable example in Asia. Consolidated solar PV and onshore wind index scores put the South Asian countries among the top league among countries from both Asia as and Western Europe. Russia and Ukraine fare rather poorly. A similar picture is emerging for small hydro and biomass. India once again scores high for the presence of policies, regulations and incentives for both sectors, whereas Pakistan and particularly Sri Lanka reflect lower scores similar to those of a number of Latin American and many Asian countries. Japan surprisingly obtains low CIRI scores in many RE sectors more similar to Sri Lanka. Once again this reflects the fact that the Japanese market may not require certain types of incentives (perhaps owing to higher prevailing electricity prices). Reliance on cheaper alternative forms of energy such as oil and gas in Russia and nuclear in Japan may also have a role in explaining their lower CIRI scores, despite a higher level of wealth than many Asian and Latin American countries that score better. Two countries in the MENA region—Egypt and Iran—with an under-developed potential for RE development, both have low CIRI scores, indicating the need to develop a more robust policy, regulatory and incentive framework. Energy Efficiency Unlike the scale of 10 used for scoring policies, regulations and incentives in RE, there is no perfect total score for EE. This is because in addition to scoring for the presence of policies, regulations and incentives, countries are also scored based on the number of appliances covered by mandatory minimum energy performance standards and labeling, which carries a weight of 2. Such an approach means that country A with 10 mandatory standards and 20 voluntary ones gets a higher score than a country with 5 mandatory standards and 100 voluntary ones. From the perspective of deployment of EE appliances, there is a higher probability that mandatory standards will be implemented as compared to voluntary standards. Therefore it is appropriate to give a higher CIRI scores based on the number of appliances covered by mandatory standards and labeling schemes, but to keep the score and weight constant at 1 21 irrespective of how many appliances are covered by voluntary standards or labeling schemes (see Table 6f for the framework used for assessing EE policies, regulations and incentives).7 The CIRI scores for EE reveal that, within the South Asian region, India is well ahead in terms of relevant policies, regulations and incentives as well as institutional structures for EE (See Annex III). India‘s high scores are largely due to a larger number of electric appliances being covered by mandatory energy performance standards, as well to the higher weights assigned to building codes. India has also introduced a trading scheme for EE credits—the first of its kind in South Asia. As EE initiatives get underway in other South Asian countries and more mandatory standards are introduced, the climate for diffusion of energy efficient appliances will certainly improve. However, India—due to the sheer size of its market, coupled with strong economic growth and its imperatives for energy conservation, energy security and greenhouse gas reductions—is likely to remain the most attractive market for energy- efficient products in South Asia. Comparative Analysis of Energy Efficiency CIRI Scores for South Asia and Other Countries The scores obtained in the case of EE policies, regulations and incentives in some ways provides a more robust and quantitative basis to assess where countries stand in terms of the environment to deploy energy-efficient products. This is because while the presence of voluntary standards and labeling initiatives are acknowledged with a nominal score, countries are really rewarded for the presence of mandatory standards and labeling initiatives (which carries a greater weight of 2). Further the more appliances that are covered by mandatory standards and labeling initiatives, the higher the CIRI score countries chalk up. Box 3: Key Indicators for Construction of CIRI EE Cross-cutting 1 Existence of Law and Policy on EE  Existence of EE Policy  Existence of EE Law 2 Existence of EE Targets 3 Designated Implementing Institution/Department 4 Availability of Trading Schemes/Tradable Instruments for EE 5 Existence of Procurements for Energy-efficient products/Construction 7 Information and numbers for lighting and electrical appliances have been obtained from the Collaborative Labelling and Appliance Standards Program (CLASP) at http://www.clasne.org/index.php. Ballast related standards and labels have been included under the category of ‗Lighting.‘ 22 Lighting 1 Existence of Voluntary Standards/Labeling Schemes for Lighting 2 Existence of Mandatory Minimum Energy Performance Standards for Lighting (Score equals number of lighting appliances) 3 Existence of Mandatory Labeling Schemes for Lighting (Score equals number of lighting appliances) 4 Subsidies/Incentive Programs available for EE Lighting Appliances 1 Existence of Voluntary Standards/Labeling Schemes for Electric Appliances 2 Existence of Mandatory Minimum Energy Performance Standards for Electric Appliances (Score equals number of appliances) 3 Existence of Mandatory Labeling Schemes for Electric Appliances (Score equals number of appliances) Buildings 1 Existence of Voluntary Green-building Codes 2 Existence of Mandatory Green-building Codes 3 Subsidies/Incentives Available for 'Green-Construction' The CIRI scores for EE broadly appear to correlate to levels of development, as reflected by the high scores of Japan and Australia and of emerging countries such as Brazil and Mexico in Latin America (Annex III). China scores particularly high, reflecting the realization among policymakers of the need to save energy, given the high energy intensity of it economy and increasing reliance on fossil fuel imports. While India has put in place a sound regulatory framework and certain sophisticated measures (such as tradable EE certificates), overall it scores much lower than China and other countries in Asia (Thailand and the Philippines) and Latin America (Brazil and Mexico) in terms of weighted EE policies, regulations and incentives. India‘s situation in EE is more comparable to Indonesia in Asia and Argentina in Latin America, and it performs better than Egypt, South Africa, Peru and even Malaysia. The main reason for India‘s lower EE CIRI score is the comparatively low number of lighting and electrical appliances covered by mandatory labeling schemes or minimum energy performance standards (MEPS In the cases of Pakistan and Sri Lanka, a low score for mandatory labeling, coupled with missing broader indicators such as EE targets and a lack of green building codes, explain why they score lower than India. 23 5. Conclusion and Next Steps It is clear that investment in RE and EE will continue to expand, driven by government policies, regulations and incentives as well as underlying macro strengths. Policies, Regulations and Incentives will continue to exert influence over investment decisions. As costs of RE and EE technologies decline and renewable power becomes comparable in cost and reliability to power generated from fossil fuels, the need for additional incentives will decline. As this trend progresses, it will be useful to analyze the correlation between policies, regulations and incentives and investment flows into the RE and EE sectors. From a survey of the literature and of regulatory frameworks worldwide, there appears to be a broad set of policies, regulations and incentives that countries usually put in place. For RE, these include preferential tariffs, RE purchase obligations or portfolio standards, income and equipment tax breaks and incentives (for producers and/or consumers), as well as incentives linked to capital and/or generation cost. For EE, the main policies, regulations and incentives include minimum energy performance standards, voluntary and mandatory labeling schemes, and incentives or tax breaks for the sale and purchase of energy-efficient products. Countries may differ in the specific design of these policies, regulations and incentives, choosing those that may be most appropriate to prevailing conditions in the country. As evident from South Asia, countries may also be at various levels of evolution with regard to the introduction of policies, regulations and incentives. Consultations with the private sector, however, have made it clear that in addition to macroeconomic indicators and the presence of policies, regulations and incentives, it is the attractiveness and effective implementation of these policies, regulations and incentives that do the most to attract private investment. Hence to effectively assess and compare various countries in terms of their investment climates, it becomes important to survey firms about their perceptions of those investment climates. The next phase of the study, therefore, will go beyond the binary framework attempted here and seek to deepen its work in South Asia by launching formal private sector surveys, and also expand it to other key developing countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America. These formally structured surveys will go beyond broad informal consultations undertaken during the present phase and attempt to gather and objectively score private sector perceptions of attractiveness of the investment climate including those based on actual implementation-related indicators. The CIRI will seek to be a living and constantly evolving tool. Based on feedback from experts and target audiences, the indices can, over time, ensure that the policy variable elements it measures are the ones that truly matter to clean energy and energy-efficiency investors. Expected Outcomes and Measurement of the Study’s Effectiveness The success of every study lies in the outcomes and long-term impact that it has and the real effectiveness and value of the study will lie in the useful information and analysis it can provide for policy makers, private investors and development agencies. The ―Assessing Investment Climate for Climate Investments‖ study provides a framework that seeks to enable the following outcomes: 24 Transparency: Provide factual information about existence of clean-energy and energy-efficiency laws in a country complemented by a qualitative assessment of the investment climate based on extensive consultations with the private sector as well. Reform: An index-based benchmarking of countries complemented by the perception of their investment climates amongst the private sector will be useful in spurring reform in these countries particularly those that obtain weaker scores. Even countries with strong overall scores will be able to identify specific policy variables that may benefit from further reform. This could lead to better evaluation and understanding of what clean-energy and EE promotion policies may or may not work in different country-contexts both by governments as well as donor agencies. Better targeting of external assistance: The study results will be useful for tailoring country-specific technical assistance to improve investment climate in the clean-energy and EE sectors both from various departments within the Bank group as well as other aid-agencies. Further it is also expected that the results will influence the nature and direction of assistance that is channeled under the auspices of the UNFCCC through the Green Climate Fund and Technology Mechanism. Independent Verification: The results could also be a useful way to independently verify National Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Action (NAMAs) that are related to clean-energy. Indicators that reveal the achievement of these outcomes will be a useful way to assess the impact and success of the study. Over a period of time it may be possible to draw a correlation between individual and a collective group of CIRIs -their evolution and implementation and flows of private sector investments in RE and EE sectors in a country. The lessons from such an exercise may indeed prove invaluable. Measuring some of these impacts will also be an important aspect of assessing the overall effectiveness of the study. 25 References Avato,P. and Coony,J.E. (2009), Accelerating Clean Energy Technology Research, Development, and Deployment: Lessons from Non-Energy Sectors, World Bank. Aaron Cosbey, Jennifer Ellis, Mahnaz Malik, Howard Mann (2008), Clean Energy Investment: Policymakers' Summary, IISD, 2008. Bhattacharya, S. and M. Cropper (2010), ‗Options for Energy Efficiency in India and Barriers to Their Adoption: A Scoping Study,‘ RFF Discussion Paper 10-20. Hamilton, Kirsty (2009), Unlocking Finance for Clean Energy: The Need for ‗Investment Grade‘ Policy, Energy, Environment and Resource Governance | December 2009 | EERG BP 2009/06. Hassett, K.A., and G.E. Metcalf (1999), ―Investment with uncertain tax policy: Does random tax policy discourage investment?‖ Economic Journal 109(457): 372–.93. Hoekman, B., Maskus, K. and Saggi, K. (2005), ‗Transfer of Technology to Developing Countries: Unilateral and Multilateral Policy Options.‘ World Development, 33(10), pp. 1587–1602.Elsevier, Oxford. Holdren.J.P. (2006), 'The Energy Innovation Imperative: Addressing Oil Dependence, Climate Change, and Other 21st Century Energy Challenges, Innovations 1, no. 2 (Spring 2006): 3-23, MIT Press, Cambridge. Barton, John H. (2007), Intellectual Property and Access to Clean Energy Technologies in Developing Countries: An Analysis of Solar Photovoltaic, Biofuels and Wind Technologies. ICTSD Trade and Sustainable Energy Series Issue Paper No. 2. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland. Brown, Marilyn (2001), ―Market Failures and Barriers as a Basis for Clean Energy Policies,‖ Energy Policy, 29 (14): 1197-1207. Jaffe, A.B., and R.N. Stavins (1994), ―The energy paradox and the diffusion of conservation technology.‖ Resource and Energy Economics 16(2): 91–122. Jaffe, A.B., R.G. Newell, and R.N. Stavins (2003), ―Technological change and the environment.‖ In K.-G. Mäler and J.R. Vincent (eds.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, Volume Elsevier Science B.V. Jha, V. (2009). Trade Flows, Barriers and Market Drivers in Renewable Energy Supply Goods: The Need to Level the Playing Field, ICTSD Trade and Environment Issue Paper 10, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland. Kirkegaard,J.F., Hanemann,T. and Weischer,L.(2009), It Should Be a Breeze: Harnessing the Potential of Open Trade and Investment Flows in the Wind Energy Industry, Working Paper, World Resources Institute and Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington D.C. 26 Kirkegaard,J.F., Hanemann,T.,Weischer, L. and Miller,M. (2010), Toward a Sunny Future? Global Integration in the Solar PV Industry, Working Paper, World Resources Institute and Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington D.C. Mallett,A., Sheridan,N. and Sorrell,S. (2010), Barriers busting in energy efficiency in industry– report for UNIDO, January 2010 Newell, R.G., A.B. Jaffe, and R.N. Stavins (1999), ―The induced innovation hypothesis and energy-saving technological change.‖ Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(3): 941–75. Kofoed-Wiuff,A.,Sandholt,K. and Marcus-Møller,C. (2006), A Synthesis of Various Studies on Barriers, Challenges and Opportunities for Renewable Energy Deployment, Ea Energy Analyses for the IEA RETD Implementing Agreement, May 2006. Some Legal Provision and Policy Highlights on Hydro Power Sector in Nepal accessible at http://www.nicci.org Sathaye, J., L. Price, S. de la Rue du Can, and D. Fridley (2005), ―Assessment of energy use and energy savings potential in selected industrial sectors in India.‖ LBNL-57293, Energy Analysis Department Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, August. World Bank (2010), World Development Report. Washington D.C. World Bank (2008) International Trade and Climate Change: Economic, Legal and Institutional Perspectives, World Bank Economic and Sector Work (Environment Department, Sustainable Development Network). Washington D.C. WTO (World Trade Organization) and UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2009), Trade and Climate Change: A Report by UNEP and WTO, Geneva: World Trade Organisation. 27 Annex I: Technical and Economic Drivers for Private Investment in Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency This section focuses on the key technical and economic drivers of and constraints to private sector investment in the solar, wind, biomass, and small hydro sectors, based on worldwide experience. The drivers and constraints are grouped in two categories: (i) those that have a critical influence on the producer‘s IRR; and (ii) others that are important but may not directly influence the IRR. Critical Factors Affecting Revenues Revenues from an RE power project are determined by two factors: (i) the number of units of electricity generated; and (ii) the price per unit. While the former is determined by factors such as technology and siting of the power project, the latter is determined mainly by regulatory support. A more in-depth analysis of these factors is provided below: a. Regulatory support Regulatory support makes RE competitive with the conventional energy and ensures that the unit price brings adequate returns. The most commonly used support mechanisms are feed-in-tariffs (FiT) and renewable purchase obligations (RPO). Some countries also use renewable portfolio standards (RPS).  A feed-in-tariff, also known as a preferential tariff, is a policy instrument to promote RE. Under the FiT mechanism, the RE producer is guaranteed grid access and a preferential price per unit of electricity generated under a long-term power purchase agreement (PPA). Such tariffs are typically offered for a long period of time (20-25 years). From an investor‘s perspective, the guaranteed price and duration of support ensures a stable return over that period. The RPO/RPS and REC are other mechanisms to promote RE power projects. In case of an RPO, the regulatory agency requires the utility companies and other large buyers to purchase a certain percentage of their total electricity from RE sources. An RPS requires electric utilities and other retail electric providers to supply a specified minimum amount of customer load with electricity from eligible RE sources.8 When these obligations are backed by strong enforcement mechanisms, including penalties in case of non-compliance, it ensures demand for RE and leads to better pricing for RE developers. Since RE is a distributed source of energy, it is likely that generation happens far from the place of consumption. In such a scenario, the obligated entities might not be able to purchase RE power. To address this issue, some countries use a mechanism called a renewable energy certificate (REC), which allows an RE generator to split the electricity into two attributes—physical electricity and a green certificate. While the former can be sold to any customer at standard electricity prices, the latter can be sold in trading exchanges to get additional revenue. This ensures an attractive return to the RE generator. 8 http://www.epa.gov/chp/state-policy/renewable_fs.html 28 b. Financial health of power purchasers (private utilities, government utilities, others) An investor does not decide to invest in a particular project based only on a favorable regulatory environment. The financial health of the buyers is equally important. If a government or private utility signs a PPA with the RE generator but is unable to pay because of lack of funds, the viability of the RE generator—and the confidence of investors—is adversely affected. For example, the Government of Spain came up with an attractive FiT policy for solar systems in 2007 and signed PPAs with several developers. In 2008, the country‘s finances were badly affected by the global financial crisis, and Spain imposed retroactive cuts to the FiTs. This created huge losses for many investors and crippled investor confidence in the Spanish RE sector. c. Site selection Site selection also has a critical impact on RE production and revenues. Some of the relevant aspects of site selection are:  irradiation levels/shading effects for solar  wind speed/topography for wind  the availability of biomass  terrain–head difference for small hydro. In developed countries, adequate surveys, studies, and resource mapping have been done and reliable data is available for an investor to predict revenues fairly accurately. However, in many emerging economies and in most of the developing world, the data are not sufficient to confidently predict the power output for a particular location over a period of time. This makes the investment decision more difficult, since if the projections prove wrong, the returns will be badly affected. This also contributes to the reluctance of commercial banks to lend for project financing. d. Technology Selection of the appropriate technology will have a positive impact on the efficiency of output and the long-term performance of the system. Some important technology considerations have emerged from consultations with private operators and investment experts.9  Solar PV – crystalline silicon output is higher for the same area compared to thin film technology.  Wind turbines – turbines with taller masts and larger diameters produce more output than smaller turbines.  Biomass – gasification-based technology has scale constraints (up to only about 2 MW) whereas combustion based technology has no such limits.  Small hydro – while hydro turbines have existed for more than a century, a number of innovations have given them higher power output while requiring significantly less maintenance. While the 9 These considerations of course have been gathered from consultations with private-sector and investment experts and do not reflect the views of the Bank or possibly other private-sector stakeholders and manufacturers. It is also important to bear in mind that given the evolving nature of these technologies these considerations may also alter in future. 29 newer turbines have a 10 to 15 percent higher capital cost, they could result in much project returns, given the long project lifetimes. Other Factors Affecting Revenues A number of other factors also affect revenues. These include: a. Vendor and contractor selection Selection of the right vendor and, where necessary, the right engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contractor to prepare the site and install the equipment, also impacts revenue. b. System degradation Another important factor that impacts revenues is the performance of the system over 20-25 years. If the system degrades more rapidly than expected, leading to progressively reduced power generation, profitability will be affected. For example, in case of solar PV, thin film PV modules have a faster degradation rate than the more robust crystalline silicon modules. c. Transmission and distribution losses These losses are usually caused by grid-inefficiencies (which can be exacerbated over longer transmission distances) as well as power theft. Certain technologies such as high-voltage direct current (HVDC) cables can help significantly reduce transmission related losses over longer distances but are usualy more expensive. d. Effective monitoring and control Electricity generation from a remote RE farm, especially solar PV and wind, depends on both uncontrollable factors, such as wind speed or cloud cover; and controllable factors such as malfunctions of fuses or turbines. An effective monitoring system will enable the timely diagnosis of problems and help to minimize downtime. e. Carbon trading An additional revenue stream for the project developer is carbon trading under the UNFCCC‘s Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). Trading under current guidelines is valid until the end of 2012. With the recent agreement at COP 17 in Durban to extend the Kyoto Protocol beyond 2012, the CDM has gotten a new lease of life and will be a source of additional revenues for RE projects. f. Co-products and byproducts Renewable power sources such as biomass enable a power producer to valorize not just power but also co-products such as charcoal or a digester effluent which serves as a soil nutrient. Waste heat can also be deployed for useful purposes, thus increasing the overall efficiency and profitability of the system. 30 Critical Factors Affecting Costs All forms of renewables except biomass entail a huge upfront fixed capital cost but negligible operation and maintenance (O&M) costs. Further, RE projects are usually shielded against the risks of inflation and supply shortages that typically affect coal-based or oil-based power plants. Some of the major factors impacting costs are given below. a. Capital costs The most important cost driver is capital cost, consisting primarily of EPC, of which the largest component is equipment.  Engineering cost refers to every aspect of system design—site surveys, soil testing, preparation of engineering drawings, validation of the plan by experts. b. Equipment cost constitutes the bulk of the project cost. Depending on the sector, purchases can include wind turbines, hydro turbines, PV modules and inverters, or biomass gasifiers. Some measures such as local content restrictions aimed at promoting indigenous equipment manufacturing can increase capital costs by reducing the competitiveness of less expensive imports thereby leading to escalation of input costs for the project.  Construction cost includes the cost of civil construction, electrical construction, approvals and clearances, erection and commissioning. c. Fiscal incentives Fiscal incentives are designed to bring down the cost of expensive RE systems. They can take several forms.  Capital subsidies reimburse the project developer for a certain percentage of the capital cost. For example, in India, off-grid solar PV projects of up to 100 kW are eligible for a capital subsidy of 30 percent. This improves the return on investment and can accelerate the adoption of RE.  Tax benefits of various types. Credits for constructing RE systems are often used during times of recession to stimulate growth in the sector and increase employment. Credits can be either short or long term. Accelerated depreciation allows the project developer to show higher depreciation upfront, thereby improving the project IRR. Certain countries also provide tax holidays for a fixed period, typically about 10 years.  Duty concessions are another way to incentivize investors. Many countries reduce or waive import duties on equipment required for an RE facility. d. Replacement of parts Over the lifetime of an RE project (20-25 years), important parts might need replacement. For example, inverters on solar PV systems, which contribute about 10 percent of total system cost, have to be replaced approximately after 10 years of operation. e. Cost of raw materials 31 For biomass-based power generation, the availability of feedstock is an important factor impacting the profitability of the project. Since biomass is a commodity, raw material costs can fluctuate, and it is important for the project developer to have a long-term strategy for procuring biomass at a relatively stable price and hedge against any huge inflation. f. Financing cost Financing cost, manifested mainly in the form of interest rates, impacts the equity IRR for a project. The financing cost is determined by many factors, including:  The project’s debt/equity ratio (i.e., the relative share of interest-bearing loans to share capital infused).  Track record of the promoter. A promoter with a good track record for quality, timely delivery, and sound finances will generally pay less interest than one who is new or does not have a good track record.  Project risk, tied to factors such as access to and rights over land where the project is located, the financial health of the power purchasing entity, and predictability of the regulatory framework, among others.  Prevailing interest rates in a country. Interest rates in the OECD countries are presently at historic lows, whereas those in emerging economies such as India are relatively very high. Thus it may make sense for an investor to raise money from the OECD countries for projects in emerging economies. Other factors affecting costs a. Land costs Land cost can be a critical factor in regions close to urban areas and in countries with high real estate values. It can also be a critical factor where the proposed site already earns revenues for the land holder (e.g., a farmer with fertile land). In other cases, especially in developing countries with large stretches of arid land, land accounts for only a small percentage of the overall cost. However, it is expected that as the cost of land continues to rise, it will account for a greater share of overall project cost. b. O&M cost In all forms of renewable energy except biomass, the annual O&M expenses form only a small percentage of the capital cost (ranging from 1 percent to 5 percent). This category of expenses includes:  Periodic maintenance  Qualified manpower  Insurance. c. Inflation Except in the case of biomass-based power, inflation contributes a negligible percentage of the total cost. As noted above, most of the cost for other renewables is upfront capital cost, with very little cost for inputs (consumables, manpower, services) over the project life. In the case of biomass, however, the 32 feedstock is a commodity and is subject to inflation, which will impact the cost of operating the power plant. d. Costs towards infrastructure development (power evacuation cost) In some cases, the nearest grid is far away from the power plant location. In this case, depending on local rules and regulations, the project developer may have to fully or partly contribute to the development of power evacuation infrastructure. This can add significantly to the overall cost. e. Opportunity costs in case of grid instability As more RE is fed to the grid, the grid can become unstable due to the variability in RE generation (e.g., solar power is generated only during daytime; wind power generation depends on wind speeds, which can be intermittent with little or no options for effective storage). A sudden surge in electricity added to the grid can lead to its collapse, which means that the RE generator may have to stop generating electricity during these times. Since the RE generator gets paid only for electricity put into the grid, any grid collapse leads to unrealized revenues and can be considered an opportunity cost. These risks can be addressed through mechanisms to control, plan, and monitor transmission systems and by scheduling outages from RE sources. India‘s Indian Electricity Grid Code is one such regulatory measure. f. Foreign exchange hedging costs This cost occurs mainly at the erection and commissioning phases, when a few months‘ delay in the delivery of imported equipment can increase the cost significantly because of exchange rate variations. g. Licensing and permitting fees The costs of regulatory compliance contribute only a small part of the total cost, but can vary from country to country. In countries with strict environmental protection rules, project developers have to comply with many regulations. Compliance costs can be relatively high in some countries (e.g., the EU), but much lower in others (e.g., Africa). But off course we are not counting here the costs from rent extraction. Given the higher upfront costs and long payback periods of renewable energy, confidence in policy stability and clarity over circumstances that might lead to policy change are also important. While mandatory renewable energy targets, in legislation at national or regional level, do provide confidence that governments are taking renewable energy seriously, a strong level of ambition when setting the target is important in creating the market demand and growth prospects needed to drive investment. In some ways, this can be legislated through ‗grandfathering‘ provisions as a way of providing confidence that a set of policy conditions will continue to apply to investments made under those conditions, regardless of subsequent policy changes (Chatham House, 2009). Energy Efficiency The rate of diffusion of energy-efficient technologies has been widely studied in the international literature. Factors that are likely to prove important in affecting the diffusion of energy-efficient technologies include appliance labeling schemes, energy efficiency standards for buildings, industry, and transportation and opportunities for financing energy-efficient appliances, and electricity prices. 33 One explanation for the slow initial rate of technology penetration is that heterogeneous consumers receive different benefits from a technology (Bhattacharya and Cropper, 2010). As the cost of the technology falls, more consumers receive positive net benefits and adopt the technology. If benefits are normally distributed across consumers, the rate of adoption will follow an S-shaped curve (Jaffee et al. 2003). This suggests that higher energy prices or lower capital costs should increase the rate of technology adoption. Empirical evidence from the United States suggests that higher energy prices have encouraged the adoption of energy-efficient room air-conditioners, central air-conditioners, and gas water heaters (Newell et al. 1999). There is, however, evidence that decreases in capital costs have had a larger effect on adoption than corresponding increases in operating costs (Jaffe and Stavins 1994; Hassett and Metcalf 1999). This suggests that either myopia (i.e., high discount rates) or capital market constraints have played a role in technology. Lack of information is another barrier. Since there are information externalities in this case—adoption by one person conveys information to nonadopters—governments can provide information about energy efficiency by requiring that appliances and machinery be labeled to show their energy usage and that efficiency claims be certified. Agency problems and lack of knowledge of the life-cycle benefits of energy-efficient technologies are also often cited as a rationale for energy efficiency standards.10 10 One classic case of agency problem often cited is if landlords make decisions regarding refrigerator and air- conditioner purchases, but tenants play electricity costs, energycosts will not necessarily be internalized in the purchasing decision (Sathaye et al. 2005). 34 Annex II: CIRI RE Scores for Select Countries Figure A1: Cross-cutting CIRI Scores for Select Countries Figure A2: Grid-Connected Solar-PV CIRI Scores for Select Countries 35 Figure A3: Grid-Connected Onshore Wind CIRI Scores for Select Countries Figure A4: Grid-Connected Small-hydro CIRI Scores for Select Countries 36 Figure A5: Grid-Connected Biomass CIRI Score for Select Countries Annex III: CIRI EE Scores for Select Countries Country Cross-cutting Lighting Appliances Buildings CIRI Scores ASIA India 4 6 13 4 Pakistan 1.5 2 0 0 Sri Lanka 1.5 3 0 3 China 4 32 75 4 Indonesia 3 4 10 1 Malaysia 0.5 2 9 2 Thailand 4 13 39 4 Philippines 3.5 18 25 2 Japan 4 6 66 4 LATIN AMERICA Argentina 4 10 20 1 Brazil 4 12 37 1 Mexico 4 10 59 4 Peru 3 1 8 0 MIDDLE EAST Iran 1 2 20 1 Egypt 0 3 16 1 37 AFRICA South Africa 4 4 30 3 AUSTRALIA Australia 5 12 59 4 38