Document Type: Procurement Plan Report No.: STEP28904 Document Date: JAN 20, 2020

Author: Duong Thanh Hung Disclosure Status: Disclosed

Document Type: Project Paper Report No.: RES38216 Document Date: DEC 30, 2019

Author: Lam,Yin Yin Disclosure Status: Disclosed

Document Type: Procurement Plan Report No.: STEP27589 Document Date: DEC 09, 2019

Author: Duong Thanh Hung Disclosure Status: Disclosed

Document Type: Implementation Status and Results Report Report No.: ISR39356 Document Date: DEC 04, 2019

Author: Lam,Yin Yin Disclosure Status: Disclosed

Document Type: Procurement Plan Report No.: STEP22664 Document Date: JUL 22, 2019

Author: Duong Thanh Hung Disclosure Status: Disclosed

Document Type: Implementation Status and Results Report Report No.: ISR34319 Document Date: DEC 13, 2018

Author: Lam,Yin Yin Disclosure Status: Disclosed

Document Type: Implementation Status and Results Report Report No.: ISR33172 Document Date: JUN 25, 2018

Author: Blancas Mendivil,Luis C. Disclosure Status: Disclosed

From June 2007 to July 2008 UNAIDS and GAMET led a five-country Modes of Transmission (MoT) process. A process evaluation was undertaken of the process, and an impact evaluation is planned at a later stage, once countries have disseminated the results of the study. ... See More + The primary motivation for initiating the Modes of Transmission (MoT) process was the recognition that, in many countries, there is a lack of alignment between programmatic and financial HIV prevention needs and the prevailing prevention responses. Significant resources continue to be invested into a variety of biomedical and behavioral prevention interventions that are not systematically evaluated for their impact or quality. At the same time, efforts at addressing underlying social norms that hinder the capacity of individuals to prevent HIV infection or to deliver services consistent with human rights and service standards remain weak, inconsistent or completely absent. In short, there is a need to ‘know your epidemic’ and ‘know your response’, and make better policy decisions about how to improve the HIV prevention response. The broader aim of the MoT process was to build capacity within countries and the region to be able to undertake similar studies in the future as part of HIV response reviews. Furthermore, the intention was to build capacity to be able to ‘synthesize’ this information, interpret it and propose recommendations and policy interventions. It is hoped that, if this initial round of the synthesis work were to be fruitful, the methods and approaches will be integrated into the ongoing HIV-related evaluation and planning processes within these countries and others in the region. The direct objectives are for the 5 participating countries to produce national HIV synthesis reports that will, over the coming months, feed directly into existing policy development initiatives in the various countries.  See Less -

Document Type: Working Paper Report No.: 127875 Document Date: JAN 01, 2018

Author: Colvin,James Mitchell; Gorgens-Albino, M.; Kasedde,Christine Disclosure Status: Disclosed

Document Type: Procurement Plan Report No.: STEP4214 Document Date: OCT 05, 2017

Disclosure Status: Disclosed

Document Type: Disbursement Letter Report No.: Document Date: JUN 23, 2017

Author: Panou,Aristeidis I. Disclosure Status: Disclosed