OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS1 NEPAL J!Jt %3 ,2012 International Development Association 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433 United States of America Re: NEPAL: IDA Credit No. 5137-NP Grant No. H786-NP Sunaula Hazar Din - Community Action for Nutrition Project Performance Monitoring Indicators Dear Sirs and Mesdames: This letter is in reference to Secticn II. A of Schedule 2 to the Financing Agreement of even date herewith between Nepal (the Recipient) and the International Development Association (the Association) for the above-captioned project (the Project). Unless agreed otherwise with the Association, the Recipient shall monitor and evaluate implementation of the Project in accordance with the performance monitoring indicators attached to this letter. Very truly yours, PAL By: Authokw Representative CONFIRMED: INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION By:_Lt Aut sentative - - Annex: Results Framework and Monitoring Country: Nepal Project Name: Community Action for Nutrition Project (Sunaula Hazar Din) (P125359) Results Framework Project Development Objectives PDO Statement The Development Objective for the Project is to improve attitudes and practices known to improve nutritional outcomes of women of reproductive age and children under the age of 2. Changes in attitudes and practices would address the key risk factors for child malnutrition and create demand for nutrition related services and products. The supply of these services and products will be provided through existing public sector and donor-funded programs, the private sector and, to a limited extent, financed through the Project. Project Development Objective Indicators Cumulative Target Values Data Source/ Responsibility for Indicator Name Core Unit of Measure Baseline YRI YR2 YR3 YR4 End Target Frequency Methodology Data Collection Percentage of unmet Baseline, Mid- family planning needs Percentage 25.00 term and end-of- Surveys Consulting firms among women 15-25 Project years of age Percentage of pregnant 7 Baseline, Mid- women taking iron and Percentage 75.00 term and end-of- Surveys Consulting firms folic acid (IFA) Project supplements for 180 days Percentage of children 0- Baseline, Mid- 6 months age who are Percentage 80.00 term and end-of- Surveys Consulting firms exclusively breastfed Project Percentage of children 6- Baseline, Mid- 24 months age who Percentage 75.00 term and end-of- Surveys Consulting firms consume a minimum Project acceptable diet Attitude of community members towards the Baseline, Mid- importance of keeping Percentage 75.00 term and end-of Surveys Consulting firms eirls in school until at Project Attitude of community members towards the Baseline, Mid- importance of reducing Percentage 75.00 term and end-of- Surveys Consulting firms indoor air pollution Project Attitude of pregnant women towards the importance of eating Baseline, Mid- three time a day Percentage 80.00 term and end-of- Surveys Consulting firms including at least one Project animal-sourced food per day Intermediate Results Indicators Cumulative Target Values Data Source! Responsibility for Indicator Name Core Unit of Measure Baseline YRI YR2 YR3 YR4 End Target Frequency Methodology Data Collection Number of wards .0 0.00 .00 Trimesterly, Routine MOFALD carrying out RRNls 20.0 Annually monitoring Percentage of wards Trimesterly, Routine carrying out RRNIs per 0 Percentage 0.00 80.00 MOFALD selected VDC Annually monitoring Number of RRNIs per Number 0.00 2.00 Trimesterly, Routine MOFAFALD ward per year LiAnnually monitoring Characteristics of RRNI rR teams: % females Percentage 40.00 Trimesterly, Routine MOFALD participating in all RRNIs Annually monitoring Characteristics of RRI teams: % minority T e] Routine participation (eg dalits, Percentage 40.00 MOFALD janajatis, sunuwar) in all Annually monitoring RRIs Percentage of successful Percentage 80.00 Trimesterly, Routine MOFALD RRIs / VDC LiAnnually monitoring Average time between Trimesterly, Routine RRI proposal submission L Days 21.00 MOFALD and approval/rejection Annually monitoring Percentage of RRIs that Li could not take off due to L Trimesterly, Routine public sector supply side Percentage 20.00 Annually monitoring MOFALD, VDC, DDC delays Semi-annual meetings of F_ Text No Twice a year Bi-annually Routine MOFALD coaches conducted I momtormng RRNI Process evaluation I Text No Yes Once, at Mid-term Mid term review MOFALD conducted L