OFFICIAL *a DOCUMENTS Supplemental Letter No. 2 REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN 2016 International Development Association 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433 United States of America Re: Credit No. 4 -UZ (Regional Roads Development Project) Performance Monitoring Indicators Dear Sirs and Mesdames: This refers to Section II.A of Schedule 2 to the Financing Agreement between the Republic of Uzbekistan (the Recipient) and the International Development Association (the Association) for the above-mentioned Project. The Recipient hereby confirms to the Association that the indicators set out in the attachment to this letter shall serve as a basis for the Recipient to monitor and evaluate the progress of the Project and the achievement of the objectives thereof. Very truly yours, REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN By Authorized epr sentative Attachment to Supplemental Letter No. 2 Republic of Uzbekistan - Regional Roads Development Project Performance Monitoring Indicators Project Development Objectives PDO Statement The proposed Project Development Objectives (PDOs) are to reduce road user costs on the project roads and develop a sustainable investment program for regional road asset management. These results are at Project Level Project Development Objective Indicators Cumulative Target Values Indicator Name Baseline YRI YR2 YR3 YR4 YR5 YR6 YR7 End Target Vehicle operating costs for cars per km 0.27 0.27 0.26 0.25 0.24 0.23 0.21 0.21 0.21 (Amount(USD)) Vehicle operating cost for trucks per km 0.52 0.52 0.50 0.48 0.46 0.44 0.42 0.41 0.41 (Amount(USD)) Travel time measured by aproxy variable- 40 43 47 51 55 59 60 60 average vehicle speed, km/hour (Number) Regional road Not Not Prepared Prepared Prepared Prepared Prepared rehabilitation program Not prepared Prepared and and and and and (text) adopted adopted adopted adopted adopted 2 Intermediate Results Indicators Cumulative Target Values Indicator Name Baseline YRI YR2 YR3 YR4 YR5 YR6 YR7 End Target Roads in good and fair condition as a share of total classified roads (Percentage) - (Core) Size of the total classified network 21995 21995 21995 21995 21995 21995 21995 21995 21995 (Kilometers - Sub-Type: Supplemental) - (Core) Length of rehabilitated regional roads 0 0 45 105 165 225 285 300 300 (Kilometers) Regional road asset management system in place and used to prepare No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes road maintenance programs (Yes/No) Adequate equipment used for traffic surveys and road asset inventory No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes conditions (Yes/No) Consolidated regional road data base using a No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes GIS created and used (Yes/No) Road users satisfied with quality of roads 28 28 34 39 46 52 58 60 60 (Percentage) 3 Female road users satisfied with quality of roads 30 30 36 41 47 53 59 60 60 (Percentage - Sub-Type: Breakdown) Male road users satisfied with quality of roads 26 33 38 45 52 58 60 60 (Percentage - Sub-Type: Breakdown) Indicator Description Project Development Objective Indicators Indicator Name Description (indicator definition etc.) Frequency Data Source / Methodology Responsibility for Data Collection Vehicle operating costs for Road user costs are measured by vehicles Annual HDM-4 analysis RRF, World Bank cars, US$/km operating costs for cars on the project roads. The indicator includes the costs of car usage, including fuel, tires, maintenance, repairs and depreciation costs. Vehicle operating cost for Road user costs are measured by vehicles Annual HDM-4 analysis RRF, World Bank trucks, US$/km operating costs for trucks on the project roads. The indicator includes the costs of truck usage, including fuel, tires, maintenance, repairs and depreciation costs. Travel time measured by a Road user costs are measured by travel Annual HDM-4 analysis RRF proxy variable - average time savings that are function of the vehicle speed, km/hour average vehicle speed on the project roads. Investment program for The program covers priority regional Annual RRF RRF regional road asset roads identified on sound technical and management economic basis. (text) 4 Intermediate Results Indicators . Responsibility for Data Indicator Name Description (indicator definition etc.) Frequency Data Source / Methodology Ceon Collection Roads in good and fair Percentage of the total classified road Annual Progress reports RRF condition as a share of total network in the project area that is in good classified roads and fair condition depending on the road surface and the level of roughness. Classified roads are the roads that have been included in the roads legislation as public roads. Please note that this indicator requires supplemental information Supplemental Value: Total classified network in the project area (KM) The Supplemental value is the total classified network in the project area. Classified roads are the roads that have been included in the roads legislation as public roads. Size of the total classified Classified roads are the roads that have Annual RRF RRF network been included in the roads legislation as public roads. Length of rehabilitated No description provided. Annual Progress reports RRF regional roads Regional road asset No description provided. Annual Progress reports RRF/Uzavtoyul management system in place and used to prepare road maintenance programs Adequate equipment used No description provided. Annual Progress reports RRF/Uzavtoyul for traffic surveys and road asset inventory conditions Consolidated regional road No description provided. Annual Progress reports RRF/Uzavtoyul data base using a GIS created and used 5 Road users satisfied with The percentage of respondents who are Annual Road user satisfaction RRF quality of roads satisfied with the quality of the project survey roads. The baseline indicator is obtained from the road user satisfaction survey completed in April, 2015. Female road users satisfied The percentage of female respondents who Annual Road user satisfaction RRF with quality of roads are satisfied with the quality of the project survey roads. The baseline indicator is obtained from the road user satisfaction survey completed in April, 2015. Male road users satisfied The percentage of male respondents who Annual Road user satisfaction RRF with quality of roads are satisfied with the quality of the project survey roads. The baseline indicator is obtained from the road user satisfaction survey completed in April, 2015. 6