SFG2503 REV KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA Livelihood Enhancement and Association of the Poor (LEAP) (Pl53591) Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) December 22, 2016 1~ LEAP P/53591 - Resettlement Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 Livelihood Enhancement and Association of the Poor (LEAP) (P1S3S91) TABLE OF CONTENT LIST OF ACRONYMS................ ....... ... .... .... .................................... ................. .......... iii ................................. EXECUTIVE SUMM.ARY.................................................................................................................... iv I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Social Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.3. Requirements for RPF and Purpose .....................................................................................2 2. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........•....•..•..•..3 2.1. Project Development Objective............................................................................................ 3 2.2. Project Beneficiaries............................................................................................................ .3 2.3. Project Description ...............................................................................................................4 2.4. Project Components .............................................................................................................4 2.5. Overview of Project Location ..............................................................................................6 J. LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK OF THE RPF .............................................................9 3.1. Cambodia Legislation and Regulations Applicable to LEAP ..............................................9 3.1.1. Cambodia Constitution 1993 ...........................................................................................9 3.1.2. Land Law 2001 .. ..............................................................................................................9 3 .1.3. The Expropriation Law .................................................................................................. 10 3.1.4. Sub-decree on Right of Way for National Road and Railroad....................................... I I 3 .1.5. Other Relevant Policies.................................................................................................. 11 3.2. World Bank Policy on Involuntary Resettlement (OP/BP4.12) ......................................... 12 3.3. Gap Between the Government Policies and the World Bank OP/BP4. l 2 .......................... 13 4. POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR LAND ACQUISITION AND COMPENSATION ••••••••••••.•• 17 4.1. Definition ofTerms ............................................................................................................ 17 4.2. Objectives and Principles of the RPF ................................................................................. 19 4.3. Eligibility, Entitlements and Compensation .......................................................................20 4.3.1. Eligibility Criteria ..........................................................................................................20 4.3.2. Entitlements and Compensation .....................................................................................21 4.4. Asset Valuation Method .....................................................................................................25 4.5. Special Considerations .......................................................................................................25 4.6. Gender Strategy ..................................................................................................................26 5. RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK'S PROCESS....................................................26 5.1. Safeguard Screening ...........................................................................................................26 5.2. Procedures Used for Sub-projects NOT utilizing C/S Fund Procedures ............................27 5.2.1. ARAP/RAP Preparation and Approval ..........................................................................27 5.2.2. ARAP/RAP Implementation Process.............................................................................29 5.3. Procedure Used for Sub-projects Funded through C/S Fund Procedures...........................30 6. IMPLEMENTATION AND.MONITORING ARRANGEMENTS •.......•..••.•••••••.••.••.••.....•..••.31 6.1. Institutional and Implementation Arrangement... ...............................................................31 6.2. Monitoring and Disclosure ................................................................................................ .32 6.2.1. Internal Monitoring ........................................................................................................32 I Page LEAP P153591-Resettlement Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 6.2.2. External Monitoring .......................................................................................................32 7. PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE .....................................32 7.1. World Bank Policies for Public Consultation and Information Disclosure........................32 7.2. Public Participation and Consultation in LEAP .................................................................33 7.3. Disclosure ...........................................................................................................................34 8. TRANSPARENCY AND GRIEVANCE MECHANISM ..........................................................34 9. .............................................. ~ ..............................................................35 BUDGET AND COSTS .... ANNEX l: TECHNICAL GUIDELINE ...................................................................................... 37 lA. Gender Action Planning Matrix ......................................................................................... 37 lB. Survey Requirements for ARAP/RAP Preparation ........................................................... .40 ID. Internal Monitoring Indicators ...........................................................................................42 lE. External Monitoring Indicators ..........................................................................................43 ANNEX2: SAFEGUARD SCREENING CHECKLIST FORM ................................................ .45 ANNEX3: SUMMARY INFORMATION MATRIX ON AFFECTED LAND AND INFRASTRUCTURE ..........................................................................................................................46 ANNEX 4: FORMATS OF RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN ......................................................47 A. Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan (ARAP) ....................................................................47 B. Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) ............................................................................................48 ANNEX5: COMMUNITY CONSULTATIONS DOCUMENTATION ...................................52 - I Page ii LEAP P153591- Resettlement Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 LIST OF ACRONYMS AC Agricultural Cooperatives ARAP Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan CCs Commune Councils CLP Commune Level Federations CSF Commune/Sangkat Fund OMS Detailed Measurement Survey ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework GDR General Department of Resettlement IRC Inter-Ministerial Resettlement Committee IDA International Development Association ID Poor Poverty Identification Process IRM Immediate Response Mechanism LEAP Livelihood Enhancement and Association of the Poor Project M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MEF Ministry of Economy and Finance MIP Micro Investment Plans Mol Ministry oflnterior NGO Non-Government Organization PAHs Project Affected Households PAPs Project Affected Persons/People PCO Project Coordination Office PG Producer Group PIM Project Implementation Manual PLUAC Provincial Land Use and Allocation Committee PPC Phnom Penh Capital PPCH Phnom Penh Capital Hall PRSC Provincial Resettlement Sub-Committee RGC Royal Government of Cambodia RAP Resettlement Action Plan RPF Resettlement Policy Framework SHG Self-help Group SLCs Social Land Concessions SLFs Sangkat Level Federations SMT Sub-Management Teams SRP Siem Reap Province ITSSP Tonie Sap Poverty Reduction and Smallholder Development Project UPC Urban Poor Community VLD Voluntary Land Donation WB World Bank WG Working Group I Page iii I LEAP Pl53591-Resett/ement Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. The LEAP project will be implemented in the two distinct contextual and institutional environments of the mostly rural Siem Reap Province and the rapidly urbanizing Phnom Penh Capital. The core project activities will be separated into rural and urban components with specific geographical scope and implementation arrangements customized to each unique setting while maintaining consistency and continuity across the project. The rural and urban components of the Project are both embedded in a community driven development model whereby local communities/groups of households make decisions regarding the types of interventions they seek and these may require the acquisition of land, mainly by voluntary donation. For example, small pieces of land may need to be acquired for the benefit of communities for income generating purposes such as small grain storage, cattle sheds, as well as basic public infrastructure such as the upgrading of roads, water supply, irrigation and drainage systems. For these reasons, World Bank safeguard policy, OP/BP 4.12, Involuntary Resettlement, has been triggered. The key beneficiaries of the project will be IDPoor 1and vulnerable households in the target 47 communes and 13 Sangkats in Siem Reap Province and Phnom Penh Capital, respectively. 1.2. As most of the project activities are to be determined during project implementation based on community demand, it is not possible to develop a firm Plan as to how to address the social risks that may arise. To mitigate potential risks associated with land acquisition and land donation, and to comply with the World Bank policy on Involuntary Resettlement and Cambodian law and regulations, the Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) will be applied to all Project investment activities. The RPF has been cleared and approved by the IRC-MEF. The RPF will establish the principles and procedures to follow if subsequent stages of project implementation are to cause any type of land acquisition. This RPF is part of the Environment and Social Management Framework (ESMF) that sets out the principles, rules, guidelines and procedures to assess the environmental and social impacts, to define the approach and procedures to ensure full Project benefits, and to mitigate negative impacts that may result from the project. 1.3. While the pilot phase did not include small-scale community infrastructure investments, this activity type has been added to the proposed new phase of the project. As such, this RPF draws heavily upon the time-tested, social and environmental risk management procedures included in the Commune/Sangkat Fund Project Implementation Manual (CSF PIM). The Commune/Sangkat Fund has been providing grants to every Commune/Sangkat in the country since 2003 for activities such as road improvements, water supply, irrigation, and other activities that are consistent with the activities to be financed under LEAP. The last update of the CSF PlM was undertaken in 2009. This CSF PIM's relevant procedures and forms will be applied for the implementation of local/community infrastructure activities under LEAP. ln addition to the CSF PIM, the RPF and the ESMF include measures for identifying and managing the environmental and social risks of other project-financed activities that are not included in the CSF PIM, in particular, small- scale livelihood investments by individual households, self-help groups and producer groups. MOI will be responsible for ensuring that the provisions of the ESMF are followed and complied with during implementation. 1 Since IDPoor surveys are only conducted every three years, commune and Sangkat leaders would be asked to identify potential households beneficiaries that may have become poor since the last survey due to economic factors (commodity price drops), natural calamities (drought, floods, destroyed crops) or other shocks based on the IDPoor questionnaire. Those identified as new IDPoor households would be given a proxy means test based on the IDPoor methodology to validate their eligibility. I Page iv LEAP PJ53591 - Resettlement Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 1.4. This RPF has been prepared based on lesson learnt from the LEAP Pilot Project and social analysis conducted at various stages of the project preparation. This RPF will be annexed to LEAP's Project Implementation Manual (PIM). This RPF document is considered a living document and could be modified and revised in line with the changing type of the project activities. When situations make it appropriate that the RPF be revised, the IRC and the World Bank will be consulted prior to its revision and any changes or revisions to the RPF will require IRC cleared and No-Objection by the World Bank. 2. LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK OF THE RPF 2.1 The RPF has been prepared to comply with World Bank OP/BP4.12 on Involuntary Resettlement and relevant Cambodian laws and regulations particularly the Constitution, Land Law, and the Law on Expropriation. Gaps between the two legal frameworks, the RGC and the WB, were analyzed and gap-filling measures are proposed for minimization of impacts on people's livelihoods. In general, the policy frameworks have few inconsistencies. 2.2 The Law on Expropriation, launched in 2010, provides principles, mechanisms, and procedures for expropriation, and defining fair and just compensation for any construction, rehabilitation, and public physical infrastructure expansion project for the public and national interests and development of Cambodia. The Expropriation Law, which is largely consistent with the main principles of the Bank's Involuntary Resettlement Policy (OP 4.12), would be applied in the case of appropriation of ownership of immovable property or the real right to immovable property of a physical person, legal entity, or legal public entity. This includes land, buildings, and cultivated plants, and for construction, rehabilitation or expansion of public physical infrastructure. 2.3 Decision No. 001 SSR/NCDD on Promulgating of the Second Revision of the CS Fund Project Implementation (CSF PIM) dated on 14 January 2009 is for implementing Commune/Sangkat Fund projects. The CS Fund supports local/community infrastructure. A local infrastructure project is a project which creates a durable physical asset that is fixed in one place and can be used by all the people in the local area2• Section 2.9 of the CSP PIM provides guidelines for preparing a land study report consisting of a voluntary land contribution report and a land acquisition report if land and/or assets, used or owned by someone, are affected by the local infrastructure development. 2.4 The overall objective of the Bank's OP/BP4. l2 policy is to avoid or minimize impacts, exploring all viable alternative project designs. Where it is not feasible to avoid resettlement, resettlement activities should be conceived and executed as sustainable development programs, providing sufficient investment resources to enable the persons displaced by the project to share in project benefits. Displaced persons should be meaningfully consulted and should have opportunities to participate in planning and implementing resettlement programs. Displaced persons should be assisted in their efforts to improve their livelihoods and standards of living or at least to restore them, in real terms, to pre-displacement levels or to levels prevailing prior to the beginning of project implementation, whichever is higher. 3. POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR LAND ACQUISITION AND COMPENSATION 3.1 This Policy covers only if sub-projects involve involuntary land acquisition and are funded apart from C/S Fund and serve the national and public interest. However, this is unlikely to happen under the LEAP Project. 2 The "local area" can mean the whole commune (for example, a road project), or a part of one village (for example, a well) but it cannot mean just one house. The parts of the infrastructure that are used by just one house (for example, the wire connecting one house to the electricity system) should be paid for by the house owner. ! Page v LEAP Pl53591 - Resettlement Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 3.2 The objectives of this Resettlement Policy Framework are (a) to avoid or minimize any land acquisition and resettlement deriving from activities under the Project, and (b) to provide fair compensation in case of occurrence of involuntary resettlement. A key principle of LEAP is that there will be no major land acquisition for small-scale sub-projects. If required, land can be acquired by for individual sub-projects by voluntary land donation, but only a small portion can be given to the Project without causing impoverishment to the land donor or by compensation that requires preparation of a resettlement action plan. The LEAP project will not allow physical displacement of peQple. Based on previous exp~rience with small- scale infrastructure investments through the Commune/Sangkat Fund, it is highly unlikely, but not impossible that compensation for land may be required. Landowners usually contribute their land via voluntary donation. 3.3 Eligibility Criteria: In cases where acquired land is not voluntarily donated and compensation is required, all PAPs who are identified in sub-project-impacted areas on the cut-off date of each sub-project are entitled to compensation for their affected assets, and rehabilitation measures sufficient to assist them to improve, or at least maintain, their pre-sub-project living standards, income-earning capacity and production levels. The cut-off date will be the final day of the detailed measurement survey (OMS) in each sub-project investment, for cases that require a RAP. Those who encroach into the sub-project investment area after the cut-off date will not be entitled for compensation or any other assistance. PAPs, under LEAP, may be categorized into i) legal owner, ii) recognizable owner, and iii) umecognized/unauthorized user. The three categories will also be impacted differently based on severity. Thus, eligible PAPs will be entitled to receive compensation based on category of PAP, scope of impact and severity. 3.4 Entitlements are defined as the rights of the PAPs to receive compensation/assistance from the project because the project causes them loss ofland, user rights, and loss of non-land based assets. Different PAPs will have different entitlements for compensation. A Compensation and Entitlements Matrix has been developed as a gap filling measure in order to minimize land acquisition impacts. The Entitlements Matrix will be updated if an ARAP/RAP is developed and impacts are clearly identified. 3.5 Compensation can be in kind or in cash. Land for land is a preferred option if land is acquired for the Project. However, previous practice indicates that a majority of PAPs opt to get paid by cash because they can purchase other land where he/she prefers. A replacement cost study (RCS) would be utilized to establish compensation rates for land, structures and trees at current market price. Normally, the RCS is updated if the project is unexpectedly delayed or market price of materials are inflated drastically. 3.6 Special consideration: RGC recognizes that certain social groups may be less able to resto~e their living conditions, livelihoods and income levels and has incorporated these concerns into the preparation and implementation of Project activities through adoption of a participatory planning and decision-making process for sub-project investments. Women in rural and urban communities play a key role in household finance and community livelihood development. They will be empowered to become active members in community activities and other collective endeavors in support of project implementation and monitoring. During implementation, the Project will give special attention to women and female households as beneficiaries ofProject interventions. Active participation of women will be ensured during the development of appropriate measures to be responsive to specific needs or concerns of groups such as landless, poor, and households headed by women, disabled, elderly or children without means of support. 4. RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK'S PROCESS 4.1 Safeguard screening is required during sub-project preparation. Social safeguard processes will be applied as per the Commune/Sangkat Fund Project Implementation Manual (CSF PIM). Social screening will be carried out by the Commune/Sangkat Councils once the sub-project investment priorities have been identified using CSF PIM's Safeguard Screening Form, see Annex 2. This Form will be updated ifrequired. LEAP District Facilitators and Community Professionals will assist Commune/Sangkat Councils in the safeguard screening process. ! Page vi LEAP Pl53591-Resettlement Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 4.2 Procedures Used for Sub-projects not funded through the C/S Fund: The Expropriation Law identifies public, physical infrastructure that serves national and public interests and that may entail acquisition of land for construction, rehabilitation or expansion. 4.2.1 RAP Preparation and Approval: The Ministry of Interior (Mol) in association with General Department of Resettlement (GDR) of the MEF (secretariat of the Inter-Ministerial Resettlement Committee-IRC) will provide general direction for planning relo~tion and involuntary land acquisition, should the need arise. MOI will ensure coordination between various stakeholders concerned with the Project including those directly connected with relocation and monitoring implementation. Prior to commencement of sub-project activities, stakeholders from investment communities where there are potential resettlement impacts will be consulted to establish planning principles and work arrangements aimed at identifying and mitigating adverse social impacts induced by the construction activities. When needed, the ARAP/RAP will be prepared to obtain information through census, inventory of losses, baseline surveys, valuation of properties, public consultation, and a determination regarding compensation. This may be in the context of temporary or permanent relocation and compensation, or in the context of mitigating other project related social impacts. Annex 4 provides formats for a Resettlement Action Plans including annotated ARAPs and RAPs. ARAP/RAPs, if needed, will be prepared by GDR with the assistance ofMol's Project team and a social safeguard consultant and submitted to IRC for review and approval prior to further submitting to the World Bank for no objection. 4.2.2 ARAP/RAP Implementation Process: After a request for ARAP/RAP implementation by Mol, IRC will mobilize its working group to work closely with PRSC-WG before commencement of any resettlement activities. Land acquisition and relocation of PAP households will not commence until the detailed RAP has been reviewed and approved by both IRC and the WB. Several steps are integral to the ARAP/RAP implementation process, including: (i) Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS) and Baseline Socioeconomic Survey (BSS); (ii) Replacement Cost Study (RCS); (iii) Preparation and approval of ARAP/RAP; (iv) Preparation and approval of resettlement budget; (v) Contract signing and compensation payment; (vi) Public Information, Consultation and Disclosure; and (vii) Notification on Site Clearance. 4.3 Procedures Used for Sub-projects Funded through the C/S Fund: CSF PIM Section 1.7 describes Commune/Sangkat funded projects. Only local or community infrastructure projects will be funded by the CS Fund. A local infrastructure project is a project, which creates a durable physical asset that is fixed in one place and can be used by all the people in the local area. The "local area" can mean the whole commune (for example, a road project), or a part of one village (for example, a well) but it cannot mean just one house. The parts of the infrastructure that are used by just one house (for example, the wire connecting one house to the electricity system) should be paid for by the house owner. Section 2.9 of the CSF PIM provides guidelines for preparing a land study report consisting of a voluntary land contribution report and a land acquisition report if land and/or assets, used or owned by someone, are affe.cted by the local infrastructure development. 5. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING ARRANGEMENT 5.1 Project Steering Committee (PSC). The project will be supervised by a Project Steering Committee, chaired by a Secretary of State in the Ministry oflnterior (Mol). This Committee would provide strategic direction and guidance in the management and operations of the project, and would include members from relevant government institutions involved in rural and urban development programs. Other institutions and individuals from academia, NGOs and the private sector will also be invited to provide advice to the committee. The PSC will ensure that safeguard activities under the Project will be carried out by the various implementing entities in compliance with the provisions set forth in this RPF. 5.2 General Department of Resettlement (GDR) ofMEF: The RPF is required to be reviewed and approved by MEF prior to submitting to the World Bank for no objection. Ifthere are resettlement impacts I Page vii f LEAP Pl 53591 - Resettlement Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 caused by LEAP sub-projects, not through CS fund, and an ARAP/RAP is required, Mol will request the MEF to deal with resettlement impacts. The MEF, through a designated Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee (IRC) and its Working Group (WG), will work closely with the Provincial Resettlement Sub- Committee (PRSC) for coordinating resettlement issues where the sub-project is located and have resettlement impact. In this case, an ad-hoc Provincial Resettlement Sub-Committee Working Group (PRSC-WG) will be established as secretariat to PRSC. In this case, MOI through its PSC will cooperate and assist t~e GDR in the preparatio_ n of the ARAP/RAP. Th~ IRC will review and approve the ARAP/RAP before submitting to the World Bank for its no objection. IRC/GDR will take a leading role in ARAP/RAP implementation. 5.3 Commune/Sangkat Council is in charge of implementing sub-projects that are funded through CIS Fund and will comply with guidelines and forms as per C/SF PIM. 5.4 Monitoring and Disclosure: Implementation of the RPF will be regularly supervised and monitored by GDR and the respective SMTs (Siem Reap and Phnom Penh) for sub-project investment activities that involve land acquisition. The findings and recommendations will be recorded in the project file for possible review by the Bank's mission to be conducted twice a year. The GDR and SMTs will supervise and monitor the process at least one time per year and include the results in the Project annual reports to be furnished to the World Bank. The SMT staff with the assistance of GDR and in close consultation with local governments and P APs will establish a set of practical monitoring indicators. Internal monitoring will be carried out by GDR on an ongoing basis and progress report prepared every quarter. In case ARAP/RAPs are prepared and implemented, monitoring will be required in order to ensure transparency and full compliance. 6. PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOURE 6.1 The World Bank policy on access to information: Public Consultation and Information Disclosure as defined by the Bank's requirements require giving the public access to project information and documentation. It requires that during the planning and preparatory process, project beneficiaries, affected groups and local NGOs shall be consulted and the environment and social aspects of the project should be presented. The consultations should be on an on-going process throughout the design and implementation of investments and must be compliant with all other applicable safeguard policies. The policy also requires that any relevant material such as the environmental assessment study, social assessments, resettlement action plan, etc. should be made accessible, in a timely manner and in a form and language understandable to the groups being consulted. 6.2 Sub-projects to be funded through the CS Fund will follow guidelines of the C/SF PIM. Unless otherwise required, the below participation and consultation approach will be used. 6.3 In the context of LEAP, extensive stakeholder consultations were carried out during the pilot project, project identification and project preparation and will continue during project implementation. The RPF has been developed based on the outcomes of those consultations. See Annex lC for Framework for Community Consultation and Participation Process. PAPs are involved in public consultation meetings in various stages of the process. Their resettlement impacts (if any) and concerns are properly recorded during the data collection process (OMS, BSS and public consultation and focus group discussion). All these issues and concerns are well incorporated into the ARAP/RAP for compensation and rehabilitation assistance. Vulnerable, female and indigenous groups will be consulted separately using focus group discussion methods. Local authorities, heads of village and commune chiefs are members of PRSC-WG. They are represented during public consultative meetings and have an important role in identifying P APs and certifying the OMS form. Representatives of PAPs are members of (i) community/village committee and (ii) grievance redress committee under the LEAP. 6.4 Disclosure: The RPF and other safeguard documents will be uploaded into the World Bank's InfoShop website prior to appraisal and later will be uploaded into project website (both in Khmer and I Page viii LEAP Pl 53591 - Resettlement Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 English). ARAP/RAPs, if prepared, will be translated into local language (Khmer), uploaded into the project website, and a copy will be sent to each Commune Council, or village committee with PAPs and the community, where there is involuntary resettlement. 7. TRANSPARENCY AND GRIEVANCE MECHANISM 7 .1 The World Bank's resettlement policy requires an investment project to establish mechanisms for grievance resolution in order to ensure PAPs' satisfaction with implementation of resettlement and land acquisition related activities, and to provide the PAPs with a legal platform for on-the-ground monitoring and reporting on the implementation of resettlement related activities. Specifically, the purpose of the grievance mechanism is to allow PAPs and persons who believe they are affected persons to seek satisfactory resolution to grievances they may have in relation to possible land acquisition or other project interventions. 7.2 For implementing this RPF, if complaints exist, the grievance procedure stated in Sub-section 2.9 of the C/SF PIM will be utilized. 8. BUDGET AND COSTS 8. l Funds for implementing the resettlement related activities will be provided by the RGC. The budget will prepared by the GDR and approved by the MEF. 8.2 In case ARAP/RAP preparation is required, each ARAP/RAP will include the detailed costs of compensation and other rehabilitation entitlements as part of the process to compensate PAPs. Arrangements will be made for PAP property and assets segregated on the basis of agricultural land, residential land, business land, houses, business assets and other holdings. The detailed budgetary estimates will make adequate provision for contingencies and the RAP. The RAP will ensure that fund flows are compatible with the timetable for payment of compensation and provision of all other assistance. The budget will cover land acquisition, relocation site development, compensation costs, allowances and administration costs, and contingency. Resettlement costs will be part of the Government's counterpart funds, not the project. The RGC will ensure timely provision of counterpart funds for resettlement to meet any unforeseen obligations in excess of the resettlement budget estimates in order satisfy resettlement requirements and objective. 8.3 Costs to cover social safeguard screening and assessment on the eligibility of each candidate sub- project will be part of the project budgets. I Page ix I P153591 LEAP - Resettlemet Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Background 1. The LEAP design has been piloted in six communes in Siem Reap Province of Cambodia, aiming to enhance poverty alleviation through rural livelihood interventions. The Pilot Project worked towards social and economic empowerment (e.g., by increasing rice production, vegetable cultivation, production of artisan handicrafts, fishing OJ," chicken raising, etc.) through the formation of self-help groups and/or producers' gJ,"oups and foundation of federations by and for the poor in Siem Reap. Full-scale implementation of LEAP was intended to cover 50 communes in Siem Reap, but this was never realized. Using a Project Preparation Advance, the full institutional arrangements for implementation were put into place and a pilot was conducted between July 2010 and June 2012. The pilot successfully facilitated the establishment of 100 self-help groups and their development to savings and credit groups. Functioning groups emerged as entry points for capacity building and resource provision for economic activities that strengthened livelihoods and increased incomes from investments in agriculture, livestock and handicraft production. 2. The proposed project would consolidate and scale up the LEAP's early achievements. The RGC also intends to use this model for addressing urban poverty. It will be tested as an instrument to address the needs of urban poor communities in Phnom Penh. The Project will primarily benefit the poorest and most vulnerable households in selected communes/Sangkats in Siem Reap and Phnom Penh, in particular, those identified as IDPoor 1 and 2. Support will be provided through Self-Help Groups, producer groups, and agricultural cooperatives (in Siem Reap Province only), as well as through skills-building and employment support services (in both rural and urban target areas). Potentially all commune/Sangkat or village households could benefit from infrastructure improvements (i.e. water supply or community road repair), but preference will be given to priorities expressed by poor households, so these households should benefit most. 3. As part of project preparation, a screening exercise was conducted in the proposed target area in Siem Reap where the project will be implemented to determine the presence of Indigenous Peoples. There is only two communes in Siem Reap identified as having ethnic indigenous minorities, the Kuoy indigenous group, located in Srae Noy and Khun Ream communes. This is not one of the project target communes. There are also no indigenous groups present in Phnom Penh. In the absence of indigenous groups in the project area, the Bank's policy on indigenous peoples (OP 4.10) is not triggered. 1.2. Social Analysis 4. As part of project preparation, a Social Analysis (SA) was conducted with the following objectives: (i) identify project beneficiaries in urban and rural areas where the project will be implemented; including the presence of vulnerable groups and indigenous communities; (ii) identify how these groups are organized and their preferences to participate during project design and project implementation; and (iii) assess the potential social risks associated with project activities including positive and adverse impacts. 5. Several instruments were drawn upon to comprise a full SA of activities planned under the project in both Siem Reap and Phnom Penh. To inform preparation of the project at the time that it was targeting 50 communes in Siem Reap, and aiming for World Bank approval in 2010, a Social Assessment as well as a Lead Social Development Specialist Report were conducted in late 2009/early 20 l 0 and August 20 I OfJanuary 2011, respectively. While only a pilot project was implemented in six communes, the lessons from this pilot were well documented in project reporting and an impact evaluation was undertaken in 2012 with a specific focus on measuring changes in social capital in treatment villages. Upon reactivation of the preparation process in 2015, the target area was expanded to include Phnom Penh. To understand the unique context of Phnom Penh, an Urban Poor Community Needs Assessment was conducted in 2015. Finally, as a complement to this array of social analysis instruments, community consultations have been reactivated in Siem Reap and expanded to include Phnom Penh. These consultations have provided additional insights into the challenges and opportunities to implementing the proposed activities in Siem Reap and Phnom Penh, highlighting new areas - I Page 1 P1.53591. LEAP - Resettlemet Policy Framework, December 22, 201.6 for livelihood support which have since been incorporated into the project design, namely skills development, training and community infrastructure. 6. Siem Reap Social Assessment (2009-2010). The methodology for the SA included a literature review (including relevant legislation and policy), interviews and group meetings with key stakeholders, and in-depth investigations in a selected, target commune (Chob Tatrav), including focus groups, semi-structured interviews and household surveys. The SA found that there was a significant need for the improvement of livelihoods of poor households to provide income for the improvement of living conditions. There was interest in SHG formation and it was highlighted that support would be needed for.members to successfully raise animals and for vegetable cultivation for consumption and sale. Vulnerable groups such as handicapped, elderly and female-headed households/widows would need additional support to participate in, and benefit from, SHGs. Types of income generation activities identified included paddy rice and farm cultivation; fish raising; animal raising; vegetables and other crops; collect other non-timber forest products such as like resin, rattan, malva nuts, bamboo, etc. For people that live near water sources such as Tonle Sap river, lake and stream, they would prioritize production of Prahouk and Pha Ak, dried fish, etc for selling after fishing season (when fish price increases). 7. Most community members interviewed indicated that they would provide land for livelihood activities, but some had concerns as to potential disputes among members of SHGs and others had very little or no land and would not be able to provide any to group activities. Respondents added that any land donated for SHG activity (i.e. pig raising) must be free of squatters, encroachers or other claims or encumbrances and the land donation of each family had to be recognized by the village and commune authorities, as is normal practice for land donation under the Commune/Sangkat Fund. The SA recommended that the limitation of voluntary land donation of no more than 10% of a household's land applied by the Commune/ Sangkat Fund be applied for LEAP activities. The report also outlined steps to undertake dispute resolution and to address the needs of women and vulnerable groups (i.e. ensuring they are not left out). 8. To assess the potential benefits and impact of the project in the additional coverage area of Phnom Penh, an Urban Poor Community Needs Assessment was conducted in 15 poor communities that were identified as likely target communities under the project. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected. Quantitative data such as estimated number of households, number of poor households, community settlement dates, were mainly from secondary sources and through key informant interviews including officials of PPC, Khan administrators and Sangkat councilors. Relevant data from the secondary sources (for example, MOP/NIS IDPoor reports) were reviewed. A total of 40 officials were covered in the key informant interviews. Primary data were gathered mainly through field investigations in the sample communities. The field investigations allowed for data triangulation and/or updates of information obtained from secondary sources and/or key informant interviews and collection of data, which were not available from the latter. The field investigations used a combination of data gathering techniques, namely, focus group discussions and physical observation. 1.3. Requirements for RPF and Purpose 9. The rural and urban components of the Project are embedded in a community driven development model whereby local communities/groups of households (mainly organized into Self-Help Groups) make decisions regarding the types of interventions they seek and these may require the acquisition of land, primarily by voluntary donation. For example, small pieces of land may need to be acquired for the benefit of communities for income generating purposes such as small grain storage, cattle sheds, as well as basic public infrastructure such as the upgrading of roads, water supply, irrigation and drainage systems (Component 1.3). For these reasons, OP/BP 4.12 Involuntary Resettlement policy is triggered. 10. As most of the project activities for the LEAP project are to be determined during project implementation based on community demand, it is not possible to develop a firm Plan as to how to address the social risks that may arise. To mitigate potential risks associated to land acquisition, and land donation, in compliance with the World Bank (the Bank) policy on Involuntary Resettlement (OP 4.12), the Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) will be applied to all Project investment activities. The RPF has been reviewed and - I Page 2 Pl.53591. LEAP- Resettlemet Policy Framework, December 22, 201.6 approved by the IRC-MEF. The RPF will establish the principles and procedures to follow if subsequent stages of project implementation are to cause any type of land acquisition. The Cambodian Government and the World Bank has agreed to implement the safeguard requirements under the project in accordance with the relevant Cambodian laws and regulations and the World Bank environmental and social safeguard policies in the design and implementation of this project, including OP 4.12, "Involuntary Resettlement". For this project, design and scheduling considerations make it impossible to determine the extent of resettlement planning requirements at appraisal. l I. While the pilot phase·did not include small-scale· community infrastructure fuvestments, this activity type has been added to the proposed new phase of the project. As such, this RPF draws heavily upon the time- tested, social and environmental risk management procedures included in the Commune/Sangkat Fund Project Implementation Manual (CSP PIM). The Commune/Sangkat Fund has been providing grants to every Commune/Sangkat in the country since 2003 for activities such as road improvements, water supply, irrigation, and other activities that are consistent with the activities to be financed under LEAP. The last update of the CSP PIM was undertaken in 2009. This CSP PIM's relevant procedures and forms will be applied for the implementation oflocaVcommunity infrastructure activities under LEAP. In addition to the CSF PIM, the RPF and the ESMF include measures for identifying and managing the environmental and social risks of other project-financed activities that are not included in the CSF PIM, in particular, small-scale livelihood investments by individual households, self-help groups and producer groups. MOI will be responsible for ensuring that the provisions of the ESMF are followed and complied with during implementation. 12. This RPF has been prepared based on lesson learnt from the LEAP Pilot Project and social analysis conducted at various stages of the project preparation.This RPF will be annexed to LEAP's Project Implementation Manual (PIM). This RPF document is considered a living document and could be modified and revised in line with the changing type of the project activities. When situations make it appropriate that the RPF be revised, the IRC and the World Bank will be consulted prior to its revision and any changes or revisions to the RPF will require IRC cleared and No-Objection by the World Bank. 2. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1. Project Development Objective 13. The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to improve access of poor and vulnerable households in selected communities to financial services, opportunities for generating income, and small-scale infrastructure, and to provide immediate and effective response in case of an eligible crisis or emergency. 2.2. Project Beneficiaries 14. The key beneficiaries of the project would be the IDPoor3and vulnerable households in the target 47 communes and 13 Sangkats in Siem Reap Province and Phnom Penh Capital, respectively. 15. The beneficiaries in Siem Reap Province would come from the 47 communes that did not receive support from the TSSD Project. 42 communes did not receive any TSSD support and will be fully covered by LEAP; and 5 communes that did not receive full coverage by TSSD but have above average poverty levels will have villages included in LEAP (Annex 2, Table 1). The beneficiaries in Phnom Penh Capital would come from the 13 Sangkats that were selected as follows: (a) for the eight districts where IDPoor data is available, the Sangkats with the largest total number of IDPoor households were selected one Sangkat each 3 Since IDPoor surveys are only conducted every three years, commune and Sangkat leaders would be asked to identify potential households beneficiaries that may have become poor since the last survey due to economic factors (commodity price drops), natural calamities (drought, floods, destroyed crops) or other shocks based on the IDPoor questionnaire. Those identified as new IDPoor households would be given a proxy means test based on the IDPoor methodology to validate their eligibility. - I Page 3 P153591 LEAP- Resettlemet Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 from the six districts comprising 10 or fewer Sangkats, and two Sangkats each from the two districts with more than 10 Sangkats; and (b) in the four districts for which IDPoor data is not available due to their central/downtown location, one Sangkat per district which has the highest total number of urban poor communities (UPC) households as identified by Phnom Penh Capital was selected. Using the combination of IDPoor and UPC criteria allowed the inclusion of both peri-urban and central-urban districts. The Phnom Penh coverage was purposely set at a modest level to allow the piloting of project activities in the urban context, with the potential of scaling-up on the basis of good implementation experience as the project progresses (Annex 2, Table 2). 16. The IDPoor household members of existing and to be established SHGs, producer groups and agricultural cooperatives would be the main project beneficiaries in Siem Reap. IDPoor households would also be the primary beneficiaries of skills development and employment assistance, with additional use of proxy means testing of applicants who do not have ID Poor cards, but may still meet the IDPoor criteria. It is expected that the households in the target communes/Sangkats would benefit from the planned infrastructure improvements under the project, but preference would be given to priorities expressed by IDPoor households to ensure that they benefit the most. Not all communities will be eligible to receive community infrastructure -only communities classified as permanent settlements will be eligible. 2.3. Project Description 17. The proposed project would be implemented in two distinct contextual and institutional environments of the mostly rural Siem Reap Province and the rapidly urbanizing Phnom Penh Capital. The core project activities would be separated into rural and urban components, each would have specific geographical scope and implementation arrangements which are customized to each unique setting while maintaining consistency and continuity across the project. 2.4. Project Components 18. Component 1: Improving Livelihoods for Rural Poor and Vulnerable Households (total estimated cost US$14.48 million; to be fully financed by IDA Credit). This component aims to address the needs of the IDPoor and vulnerable households in the 47 communes in Siem Reap Province through a demand driven approach. As the predominant sources of income for these rural poor households are from agriculture, livestock and fisheries, the project would leverage the technical support of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (MAFF) and other technical service providers. Drawing from the experience of the pilot project, this component would be implemented by the Siem Reap Provincial Government through the following sub-components: 19. Sub-Component 1.1: Building and Strengthening Institutions of the Rural Poor (total estimated cost US$8.27 million; to be fully financed by rDA Credit). This would support the formation and strengthening ofassociations of poor and vulnerable households in Siem Reap Province, mainly through SHGs, producer groups or agricultural cooperatives, in order to enable their members to engage jointly or individually in productive activities. Capacity building assistance would include basic financial literacy (savings, budgeting, etc.), micro-enterprise/business planning, basic accounting and record keeping, good governance practices, and access to financial services. Furthermore, groups and individual farmers would be assisted and strengthened through facilitation of market linkages, technical assistance and capacity building for producers to increase access to assets, skills, technology and markets. 20. To supplement the initial savings generated by the SHGs, the project would provide seed grants (US$1,000-1,500 per SHG) for on-lending to members to implement their Micro Investment Plans (MIPs). The grant would be for SHGs that have previous experience in implementing and managing microenterprises/livelihood activities. Where commune-level federations of SHGs, producer groups, agricultural cooperatives, etc. are existing and assessed by commune councils as qualified to handle funds for on-lending to member groups, the project would provide them with Community Livelihood Investment Fund - I Page 4 P153591 LEAP - Resettlemet Polley Framework, December 22, 2016 (CLIF) grant of up to US$37,000 per federation. This grant would be on-lent to member groups that are not qualified to access credit from MFis and other formal banking institutions, for their investment plans. T he project would also link the federations with financial institutions to access additionaVbigger credit funds and other financial services. 21. MAFF as well as NGOs/other service providers would be tapped to provide technical assistance and market linkage services to the beneficiary groups and where warranted, to individuals. These would focus on improving production efficiency, productivity enhancement, access to technology extension, logistics infrastructure and information services, and building pro-poor market systems for small and marginal producers that would enable them to participate in higher value chains. 22. Sub-Component 1.2 Enhancing Skills and Employment Opportunities for tire Rural Poor (total estimated cost US$1.96 million; to be fully financed by IDA Credit). Taking advantage of the opportunities offered by enterprises connected to the rapidly growing tourism industry in Siem Reap, this sub-component would provide a complementary livelihood pathway to self-help group, value-chain and market access support under Sub-component l. l. The Project would invest in the development of beneficiary skills (particularly unemployed youth and women from poor households) and the ability to obtain new or improved wage employment. Activities would include: (a) local labor market surveys and training provider assessment; (b) beneficiary selection; (c) employability training and career counseling; (d) voucher provision and skills training; (e)job placement and employment support, including to engage in partnership with the tourism sector (hotels, basic English training for tourism related job opportunities). 23. Sub-Component 1.3: Improving Basic Services and Community Infrastructure (total estimated cost US$4.25 million; to be fully financed by IDA C redit). This would support small-scale community infrastructure and services to respond to the priority needs of the beneficiaries and contribute to their productivity and income generating potential. Investments would include storage or small warehouses, water supply and sanitation facilities, small-scale irrigation schemes, community access roads, and better on-farm water management practices, among others. The identification of priority needs would follow the existing annual participatory identification and planning process that provides opportunity for the beneficiaries to advocate their investment priorities and ensure that these are included in the Commune Investment Plan (CIP). The project will use the Commune/Sangkat Fund Project Implementation Manual (CSF PIM) for the preparation and implementation of community sub-projects. The CSF PIM has been used by Communes to small-scale investments for several years. The CSF-PIM is a tested manual that has been used by Communes for planning and implementation of small-scale investments for several years. 24. Component 2: Improving Livelihoods for Urban Poor and Vulnerable Households (US$3.72 million; to be fully financed by IDA Credit). This component aims to address the needs of the IDPoor and vulnerable households in 13 Sangkats in Phnom Penh Capital through a demand driven approach. Activities would include: (a) skills development training; (b) employment support services; and (c) provision of productive infrastructure to improve livelihood and increase productivity. Direct financial services support would not be provided but where appropriate, linkages to existing financial institutions and services would be facilitated. This component would be implemented by the Phnom Penh Capital Hall through the following sub- components: 25. Sub-Component 2.1 Enhancing Skills and Employment Opportunities for the Urban Poor (total estimated cost US$1.69 million; to be fully financed by IDA Credit). Since there are many training and employment programs in Phnom Penh and a wider range of employment opportunities compared to Siem Reap, support would be provided to more secure, satisfying and higher earning jobs. As in Sub-Component 1.2, Project would invest in the development of beneficiary skills (particularly unemployed youth and women from poor households) and the ability to obtain new or improved wage employment. Activities would include: (a) local labor market surveys and training provider assessment; (b) beneficiary selection; (c) employability training and career counseling; (d) voucher provision and skills training; (e) job placement and employment I Page 5 P1.53591. LEAP- Resettlemet Policy Framework, December 22, 201.6 support. Some of the livelihood priorities identified during project preparation include food preparation and processing, handicraft making, retailing/ buy and sell, off-site garment factory sewing/dressmaking, cosmetology services, transportation operations, etc. Beneficiaries, particularly youth, would be encouraged to consider a wider range of career opportunities and skills where there is high demand and potential for career development in the private sector. 26. Sub-Component 2.2: Improving Basic Services and Community Infrastructure (total estimated cost .US$2.03 million; to be fully financed by IDA Credit). This would follow the same process as in Sub- . Component 1.3, drawing on use of the CSF PIM. To ensure that the sub-projects would most benefit the poor and vulnerable households such as the UPCs, the community planning meetings would include both ID Poor households and representatives of the UPCs. The types of infrastructure facilities that would be funded include but would not be limited to drainage system, community road/footpath, water supply and sanitation system, and street lighting. These community infrastructure investments have been identified in the UPC needs assessment and are expected to increase the beneficiaries' productivity, resilience and ability to adapt to natural and economic shocks. 27. Component 3: Project Management (total estimated cost US$1.97 million; financed by IDA Credit and RGC). This component would support the overall implementation, supervision and coordination of the project at the national, provincial, district/Khan, commune/Sangkat, and village/community levels, including: (a) social and environmental safeguard risk management; (b) procurement planning and contracts management; (c) financial management, disbursement and audit; and (d) monitoring and evaluation (M&E), and communication. 28. Component 4: Contingent Emergency Response (US$0.00 million). This component, with an initial allocation of zero dollar, is part of the World Bank's (IDA's) support to an immediate response mechanism in Cambodia. This would allow the reallocation of a portion of undisbursed balance of the project for recovery and reconstruction support following a formal government request in the event of an eligible emergency. 2.5. Overview of Project Location 29. Siem Reap province is surrounded by five other provinces, in the north is Otdar Meanchey, in the west is Banteay Meanchey, in the east are Preah Vehaer and Kampong Thom, and in the south the province borders partly with Battam Bang and partly with Tonie Sap Lake. In Siem Reap, the project covers 47 communes in 9 districts (Angkor Thum, Chi Kraeng, Kralanh, Prasat Bakong, Puok, Svay Leu, Siem Reap, Srei Snam and Sotr Nikum). These communes have been selected largely on the basis of geographic distribution of the province across two donor-financed projects, the ADB and !FAD-financed TSSD project and LEAP. 58 communes in Siem Reap have already been covered by TSSD, so LEAP will cover the remaining communes in the province. Figure I is map of the project location in 47 communes in rural Siem Reap province. 30. There are five protected areas located in Siem Reap Province, and two of them are located in the project area (Angkor Protected Landscape area and Phnom Kulen National Park). However, it is expected that the Project as well as proposed sub-projects in Siem Reap will finance SHGs and producer groups to invest in agriculture, livestock and fisheries activities as well as small-scale productive infrastructure (e.g. post-harvest processing equipment, storage facilities and poultry shed, etc.). These activities may affect natural habitats, wet land, protected areas and their biodiversity in the project area in particular Tonle Sap Lake from wastewater discharge from livestock raising activity and utilization of illegal fishing gears and methods, etc. These impacts are minor and site specific and it can be mitigated through the application of Technical Environmental Guidelines included in the ESMF. The LEAP Project will not finance activities related to protected areas management, neither facilitation or access restriction activities. I Page 6 P153591 LEAP- Resettlemet Polley Framework, December 22, 2016 Figurel: Map of Project Location in 47 Communes in Rural Siem Reap Province Oddor. Monncho\I· - >- • Prcnh Vih•ar 0 I: u • c e: ~ • • >- Ill - - .-- • c: Ill al .... - • - • ... .... -- • • SI ie m Re - p -- --- - . ...- - - ..... • Battamb 1ng - - -- - Kampoog Thom Pursot I Page 7 f P153591. LEAP - Resettlemet Polley Framework, December 22, 2016 31. In Phnom Penh, 13 out of 105 Sangkats (the urban equivalent of a commune) will be included in the project. Figure 2 is map of the project location in 13 Sangkats in urban Phnom Penh Capital. Figure 2: Map of Pr~ject Location in 13 Sa ngkats in Urban of Phnom Penh Capital Kanda I Kanda I • M.lt41't . . . . . ·~-t~ MAP OF LEAP TARGET OOMMUN/SANGKAT C]Kho,.-.~ c:::J.....-.. _ IN PHNOM PENH 0 '- · I , ~ , , , f ....,., 1 l ective SMTs and investments investment's and compensation and entitlements according to their District and numbers? authority entitlements • Have the PAPs received their payments on time? Beneficiary- • Have special assistance been provided to vulnerable PAPs? communities • Have all PAPs received the agreed transportation and food allowances? • Have all PAPs that lost their livelihoods or small business received their compensation? • Have all the beneficiaries entitled been implementing investments? • Have the women been trained according to their desired livelihood? • Was the number of women trained on desired livelihood the same as that of the actual number engaged in micro enterprises? • Are the beneficiaries engaged in micro enterprises assisted by micro financing institutions? • Were the actual amounts of investment costs and compensation been disclosed to beneficiaries and PAPs? Consultation, • Were IEC campaign materials prepared and distributed to Beneficiaries/Di Grievance stakeholders during investment disclosures? strict and Special • Have consultations, focus group discussions and/or public meetings authority/SMTs Issues been undertaken as scheduled? • Were the beneficiaries and PAPs took active participation in planning and implementation according to what were prescribed in the project? • Have any beneficiaries and/or PAPs used the grievance and redress procedures? What were the outcomes? • How many have filed their grievances? What were the outcomes? • Was social preparation for the PAPs taken place? Benefit • Where there changes occurred in patterns of occupation of the Beneficiaries Monitoring beneficiaries compared to their pre-project situation? • What changes have occurred in income and expenditures patterns compared to pre-project situation? What have been the changes in cost of living compared to pre-project situation? Have the incomes of housing beneficiaries kept pace with these changes? • What changes have taken olace in the lifestyle of beneficiaries? lE. External Monitoring Indicators Types of Indicators Information required in Monitoring and Evaluation Indicators Staffing • Number of SMTs and district staff assigned for project implementation; "'c ~s • Number of Social Development and Resettlement Specialist assigned by Col~ CMUs. e·- 'i Consultation, • Number of consultations and participation programs held with PAPs and Q,; ... Participation, and • various stakeholders; Types of IEC campaign materials distributed to target-beneficiaries and I P age 43 P1.53591. LEAP - Resettlemet Policy Framework, December 22, 201.6 Grievances PAPs; Resolution • Number and types of grievances received from beneficiaries and PAPs and the number of days consumed in resolving them by concerned GRCs; • Number and names of representatives who participated in the consultations and in the implementation of the investment project Operational • Types of forms used in recording the activities undertaken in the project Procedures implementation; • Efficiency of coordination with CMUs, district authority;_PAPs and other institutions/stakeholders; • Type of database being maintained; • Efficiency of SMTs and district government staff; • Efficiency of compensation payment system; • Adequacy of logistical support for implementing the investment project; • Asses if the project policies in ARAPs have adequately been complied with. Issues and Indicate the issues and problems encountered in staffing, during consultations Problems and grievances resolution, and in the execution of operational procedures. Encountered Compensation • Number of PAPs awarded with housing units, if any; and • Indicate if the type of compensation delivery is either one time or Entitlement installment; • Indicate the number of PAPs engaged in micro business who were compensated for their loss of business incomes; • Indicate if the number of PAPs provided with transportation assistance; • Indicate if food assistance were given to PAPs who transferred to staging area or to other destinations; • Indicate if the PAPs were given allowance/assistance for the dismantling and reconstruction of their housing units in as well as for the dismantling of their structures upon transfer. Social • Indicate the number of women that attended the livelihood trainings; Rehabilitation • Indicate the number of PAPs, especially women, who have set up their micro enterprises after the training on livelihood development; • Indicate if the PAPs have adeauate access on safe drinking water. Issues and Indicate the issues and problems encountered in the implementation of Problems investment/s, payment of compensation and entitlement and social Encountered rehabilitation of PAPs. Household • Present income as compared to income from pre-project level; Earning • Employment of housing beneficiary members in investment cons.truction; r.! Capacity • Change in income of micro entrepreneurs. s ... OI u Health and • Problems/issues on waste management disposal; "" .s Environment • Improved access to safe drinking water; ~ Improvement on health conditions of women and children. OS Changes in • More women participating in microenterprises; - c:i.. e Socio- • Accesstonewtechnologybroughtaboutbyhavingelectricityconnections; cultural Pattern ! Page 44 P153591 LEAP - Resettlemet Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 ANNEX2: SAFEGUARD SCREENING CHECKLIST FORM (see a completed example in the CSF PIM) Province/Municioalitv IDistrict/Khan I Commune/Sanakat Name of Project: Does the project need environmental analysis (EA)? Yes [ I No [ I If NO, reason why? .......................................................................................................... Does the project potentially affect any known physical, cultural, and religious resources? If yes, immediately report to the World Bank Group and the re levant Government departments............................... In case of potential damage to chance finds, stop work in the area immediately and proceed in line wi~h the relevant national laws and WB OP 4.11. ........................................................................................................................................ Does the project need report on Environmental Safeguard Measures in connection? Ives[) No [ I If NO, reason why? .......................................................................................................... ········································································································································· Date....................... C/SChief Date: ............................ The official conducted the screening Date.......................Technica!Assistant Source: Adapted from the commune/sangkat PIM 2009. I P age 45 P153591 LEAP- Resettlemet Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 ANNEX3: SUMMARY INFORMATION MATRIX ON AFFECTED LAND AND INFRASTRUCTURE Province: District: Village/Commune: - - - - - - - - - - - HHNo. Name of No. of Total Land to Loss Loss of Assets Loss of Crops Loss of Other Loses Hadof Persons in LaDdholdi.Dc be as o/• other Housdlold Housebold of acquired of Assets HoUKhold (ml) Total Busi.Dess Income Structures Structures Area of Fruit Area of Other Example: Residence (ml) (rented) Lost Lost Permanent Temporary Residential Trees Trees/Crops (Specify) graveyards. (m2) (ml) Land Lost Lost Lost (m2) wells, etc. (ml) (Type (type and and nlUllber) Number) I P age 46 f/ P1.53591. LEAP- Resettlemet Polley Framework, December 22, 201.6 ANNEX 4: FORMATS OF RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN A. Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan (ARAP) Introduction (a) Project description in brief: refer to the RAF that covers the project and provides the policies and principles for the ARAP; (b) Brief description of the subproject development objectives and intended beneficiaries; and (c) Describe the activities that will give rise to impacts that require "resettlement" (i.e., anything that causes loss of land, assets or elements of PAP livelihood - not only physical r.elocation, but also, loss of trees, temporary relocation of roadside stall (kiosk), and comprised access. Census of PAP and Inventory of Assets (a) Brief description of how the data was gathered (e.g., household survey); (b) Table of PAP and PAH, contact details, affected livelihoods, assets, value of affected dwelling/structures/assets; and (c) Brief comment about any significant differences, sources of vulnerability of PAP and different populations (ethnic peoples and vulnerable groups - women and female/male youth and children, the elderly and disabled, landless, and poor, etc.), or state that they are representative of the general socio-economic profile of the country. Compensation to be provided (a) Forms of compensation to be provided (e.g., cash or in-kind); (b) Description of the conditions for voluntary donation (if applicable), including: o Free, prior and informed consultation (FPIC) made of the PAP own volition and is un- coerced with the decision making ability to withhold consent; o No severe impacts on living standards; no physical relocation and not more than I 0 percent of PAP total livelihood assets to be affected; o Availability of complaints and compensation procedure; and o Documentation and independent verification of the donation of land or assets. Consultation with Affected Persons (a) Brief description of the general public disclosure communications to announce the project and invite comment; (b) Subsequent consultations with known or self-identified PAP; o Alternatives discussed with PAP and the community; and o Dissemination of information about the cut-off date for registering as PAP; availability of a complaints/grievance mechanism (c) Arrangements for formal disclosure of resettlement instrument; availability for public disclosure, review and comment, and posted on Mol and the World Bank websites. Institutional Responsibilities for Delivery of Compensation (a) Responsible agencies; (b) Method of notification to PAP; (c) Timing of settlement (before the incidence of the loss to be compensated); ( d) Method of verification, disclosure and witnessing of the settlement (i.e., annex form for recording and witnessing handover of entitlement); and ( e) Process for handling complaints or grievances, and appeals. Implementation Reporting and Monitoring (a) Institutional responsibilities for reporting and monitoring of the ARAP; (b) Independent participation in monitoring (e.g., CSOs, research institutes, etc.); and (c) Summary report on consultation with the wider community (append attendance register to document). I P age 47 Pl53591 LEAP- Resettlemet Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 Timetable and Budget (a) Time and task matrix; (b) Source and flow of funds; o Consultation costs; o Personnel costs; o Office overhead expenses; o Compensation funds; and o Monitoring and reporting costs. B. Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) Introduction (a) General description of project in relation to policies and principles which inform the RAP; (b) Describe sub-project development objectives and intended beneficiaries briefly; and (c) Describe the activities that will give rise to impacts that require "resettlement" and comprised access. Scope of Land Acquisition and Resettlement Impacts (a) Level of detail varies with the magnitude and complexity of the resettlement; (b) Collect up-to-date and reliable information, including: o The proposed resettlement and its impacts on the displaced persons and other adversely affected groups; and o Legal issues involved in resettlement. (c) Any issue described below which is not relevant to sub-project circumstances, should be explained. Description of the Sub-project (a) Short detailed narrative on subproject initiatives and/or activities; and (b) Identification of the subproject area and footprint. Potential Impacts Identified (a) Project component or activities that give rise to resettlement; (b) Zone of impact and region of influence (ROI) of subproject initiatives and/or activities; (c) Alternatives considered to prevent (avoid) or minimize resettlement; and (d) Mechanisms established to minimize resettlement, to the extent possible, during project implementation. Main Objectives of the Resettlement Program (a) Sets out the purpose and objectives. Socioeconomic Studies (a) Conducted in early stages of subproject preparation and with the involvement of potentially displaced people, including: o The results of a census survey covering: • Current occupants of the affected area to establish a basis for the design of the resettlement program and to exclude subsequent inflows of people from eligibility for compensation and resettlement assistance; • Standard characteristics of displaced households, including a description of production systems, labor, and household organization; and baseline information on livelihoods (i.e., production levels and income derived from both formal and informal economic activities) and standards of living including health status and well-being of the PAP and PAH; • The magnitude of the expected loss of assets (i.e., total or partial) and the extent of displacement, physical or economic; I P age 48 P153591 LEAP- Resettlemet Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 • Information on vulnerable groups or persons (OP/BP 4.12, paragraph 8) for whom special provisions may have to be made; and • Provisions to update information on the displaced PAP and PAH livelihoods and standards of living at regular intervals so that the latest information is available at the time of their displacement. (b) Other studies describing the following: o Land tenure and transfer systems, including an inventory of common property natural resources from which PAP derive their livelihoods and sustenance, non-titled usufruct systems (i.e., fishing, grazing, or use of forest areas) governed by local recognized land allocation mechanisms, and any issues raised by different tenure systems in the sub-project footprint; o Patterns of social interaction in the affected communities, including social networks and social support systems, and how they will be affected by the project; o Public consultation and social services that will be affected; and o Social and cultural characteristics of displaced communities, including a description of formal and informal institutions (i.e., civil society organizations including CBOs, NPAs) that may be relevant to the consultation strategy and to designing and implementing the resettlement activities. Legal Framework (a) Findings of an analysis of the legal framework, covering: o The scope of the power of eminent domain and the nature of compensation associated with it in terms of both the valuation methodology and the timing of payment; o The applicable legal and administrative procedures, including a description of the remedies available to displaced persons (PAP and PAH) in the judicial process and the normal timeframe for such procedures, and any available alternative dispute resolution mechanisms that may be relevant to resettlement under the project; o Relevant law (including customary and traditional law) governing land tenure, valuation of assets and losses, compensation, and natural resource usage rights; customary personal law related to displacement; and environmental laws and social welfare legislation; o Laws and regulations relating to the agencies responsible for implementing resettlement activities; o Gaps, if any, between local laws covering eminent domain and resettlement and the World Bank's Resettlement Policy (OP/BP 4.12), and the mechanisms to bridge such gaps; and o Any legal steps necessary to ensure the effective implementation of resettlement activities under the project, including (as appropriate) a process for recognizing claims to legal rights to land (i.e., claims that derive from customary law and traditional usage- see OP/BP 4.12, paragraph 15 b). Institutional Framework (a) Findings of an analysis of the institutional framework, covering: o Identification of agencies responsible for resettlement activities and CSOs that may have a role in project implementation; o Assessment of the institutional capacity of such agencies and CSOs; and o Any steps proposed to enhance the institutional capacity of agencies and CSOs responsible for resettlement implementation. Eligibility (a) Definition of displaced persons (PAP and PAH) and criteria for determining their eligibility for compensation and other resettlement assistance, including relevant cut-off dates. Valuation of Land (a) Methodology to be used in valuing losses to determine their replacement cost; and a description of the proposed types and levels of compensation under local law and such supplementary measures as are necessary to achieve replacement cost for lost assets. I P age 49 P153591 LEAP- Resettlemet Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 Resettlement Measures (a) Description of the packages of compensation and other resettlement measures that will assist each category of eligible displaced persons (PAP and PAH) to achieve the objectives of the policy (see OP/BP 4.12, paragraph 6). In addition to being technically and economically feasible, the resettlement packages should be compatible with the cultural preferences of the displaced persons, and prepared in consultation with them. Site Selection, Site Preparation, and Relocation (a) Alternative relocation sites considered and explanation of those selected, covering: o Institutional and technical arrangements for identifying and preparing relocation sites, whether urban or rural, for which a combination of productive potential, locational advantages, and other factors is at least comparable to the advantages of the old sites, with an estimate of the time needed to acquire and transfer land and ancillary resources; o Any measures necessary to prevent land speculation and influx of ineligible persons at the selected sites; o Procedures for physical relocation under the project; including timetables for site preparation and transfer; and o Legal arrangements for regularizing tenure and transferring titles to resettlers. Housing, Infrastructure, and Social Services (a) Plans to provide (or, to finance PAH provision of) housing, infrastructure (e.g., water supply, feeder roads), and social services (e.g., schools, health services, etc.); plans to ensure comparable services to host populations; any necessary site development, engineering, and architectural designs for these facilities. Environmental Protection and Management (a) Description of the boundaries of the relocation area; and an assessment of the environmental impacts of the proposed resettlement and measures to mitigate and manage these impacts (coordinated as appropriate with the ESMP of the main investment requiring the resettlement). Community Participation (a) Description of the strategy for consultation with and participation of PAH and hosts in the design and implementation of the resettlement activities; (b) Summary of the views expressed and how these views were taken into account in preparing the resettlement plan; (c) Review of the resettlement alternatives presented and the choices made by displaced persons regarding options available to them, including choices related to forms of compensation and resettlement assistance, to relocating as individual families or as parts of pre-existing communities or kinship groups, to sustaining existing patterns of group organization, and to retaining access to cultural property (e.g., places of worship, pilgrimage centers, cemeteries); and (d) Institutionalized arrangements by which displaced people (PAP) can communicate their concerns to project authorities throughout planning and implementation, and measures to ensure that such different populations (ethnic peoples and vulnerable groups - women and female/male youth and children, the elderly and disabled, landless, and poor, etc.), are adequately represented. Integration with Host Populations (a) Consultations with host communities and local governments; (b) Arrangements for prompt tendering of any payment due the hosts for land or other assets provided toPAH; ( c) Arrangements for addressing any conflict that may arise between PAH and host communities; and ( d) Any measures necessary to augment services (e.g., education, water, health and productive services) in host communities to make them at least comparable to services available to PAP (i.e., resettlers). I Page 50 Pl53591 LEAP- Resettlemet Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 Grievance Procedures (a) Affordable and accessible procedures for third-party settlement and disputes ansmg from resettlement; such grievance mechanisms should take into account the availability of judicial recourse and community and traditional dispute settlement mechanisms. Organizational Responsibilities (a) Organizational framework for implementing resettlement, including identification of agencies responsible for delivery of resettlement measures and provision of services; (b) Arrangements to ensure appropriate coordination between agencies and jurisdiction(s) involved in implementation; and (c) Measures (including technical assistance) needed to strengthen the implementing agencies' capacity to design and carry out resettlement activities; provisions for the transfer to local authorities or PAH (resettlers) themselves of responsibility for managing facilities and services provided under the project and for transferring other such responsibilities from the resettlement implementing agencies, when appropriate. Implementation Schedule (a) Schedule covering all settlement activities from preparation through implementation, including target dates for the achievement of expected benefits to PAH (resettlers) and hosts and terminating the various forms of assistance. The schedule should indicate how the resettlement activities are linked to the implementation of the overall project. Costs and Budget (a) Tables showing itemized cost estimates for all resettlement activities, including allowances for inflation, population growth, and other contingencies; timetables for expenditures; sources of funds; and arrangements for timely flow of funds; and funding for resettlement, if any, in areas outside the jurisdiction of the implementing agencies. Monitoring and Evaluation (a) Arrangements for monitoring and evaluation activities by the implementing agency, supplemented by independent monitors as considered appropriate by the World Bank, to ensure complete and objective information; (b) Performance monitoring indicators to measure inputs, outputs, and outcomes for resettlement activities; (c) Involvement of the displaced persons (PAP and PAH) in the monitoring process; and (d) Evaluation of the impact of resettlement for a reasonable period after all resettlement and related development activities have been completed using results of resettlement monitoring to guide subsequent implementation. ! Page 51 Pl5359l LEAP- Resettlemet Polley Framework, December 22, 2016 ANNEXS: COMMUNITY CONSULTATIO NS DOCUMENTATION Below is a summary of each of the community consultation meetings conducted in July 2016, seeking feedback regarding overall project design and safeguard arrangements, as well as a summary of all community consultations during the preparation of the project. Summary of Consultations on Project Design, Project Budget and Implementation Arrangements, and the related safeguards instruments and documentation in Anlong Samnar Commune Hall, Chi Kraeng District, Siem Reap Province, July 22, 2016 Participants: Anlong Samnor Team: Mr. Seng Yon - commune Chief, Mr. Kong Choeun, Mr. Sok Thoeun, Ms. Nob Cheng Nay (see detail attendance list in Annex 11 d) SRP Team: Mr. Chun Chamnan, Mr. Ngom Soytry WB Team: Erik, Kate, Reaksmey, Andreas, Saroeun, Kongkea, Sarin, Narya Topics/issues presented: • Introduction of participants and meeting purposes. • The WB team presented status of LEAP project design. • Provincial team briefresults of LEAP pilot project to the meeting • Villagers shared experiences on the success and failure of their saving and SHGs groups that they have been established and supported by NGOs. • Discussion and brainstorming problems and issues faced in communities Discussion and conclusions: • The importance of NGO involvement in the process of establishing and strengthening saving and SHGs has been acknowledged. • They still need NGOs or other saving or SHG experts to help in group facilitation and book keeping. • In rainy season flood, in dry season, water is not enough for their farming activities, since the existing dump is not high enough (request to repair and add one more meter high) • Road renovation is also the priority for Kampong Samnor commune. • They need technical support on animal rearing, farming both rice and vegetable • They also need other vocational skills to improve their sale labor. List of People Met, Consultation Meeting, Anlong Samnar Commune, Chi Kraeng District No. Name Position Institution 1 Mr. Seng Yon !Commune Chief, Anlong Samnar Anlong Samnar Commune Siem Reap 2 IMr. Kong Choeun I 51 Vice Chief of Commune Council Siem Reap 3 !Mr. Sok Thoeun !Commune Council Member Siem Reap 4 !Ms. Nob Cheng Nav !Commune Council Member Siem Reap 5 Mr. Khim Khloune: Commune Council Member Siem Reap 6 Mr. Korng Nov Commune Council Member Siem Reap 7 Mr. Khiev Sone: Commune Council Member Siem Reap 8 Mr. AthEng Commune Clerk Siem Reap 9 Mr. Poy Phallv Commune Assistant Siem Reap 10 Mr. Ly Langdy Village Chief, Anlong Samnar Village Siem Reap 11 Mr. Pheu Phoeun Village Chief, Sdau Village Siem Reap 12 Mr. Chay Phat Village Chief, Samrong Thom Village Siem Reap 13 Mr. Hun Chen Village Chief, Lbaeuk Villae:e Siem Reap 14 Mr. LeaoHav Villa!!e Chief, Chaek Khsach Kraom Villa!!e 15 Mr. Keov Chin!! Vice Village Chief, Chaek Khsach Kraom Village Siem Reap I P age 52 P153591 LEAP- Resettlemet Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 16 Ms. Samrith Eng Villager, Chaek Khsach Kraom Village Siem Reap 17 Mr. Tim Ry Vice Village Chief, Anlong Ruessei Village Siem Reap 18 Mr. Peng Hay Village Chief, Prek Angkor Thmei Village Siem Reap 19 Mr. Kim Khorn Vice Village Chief, Svay Ta Daok Villfwhom participated in the pilot. rProject Preparation !April 10, 2016 Rolum Run Thmey rro conduct Village Chief, 3 village, Sre Noy iscreening exercise Group Leaders, and !April 9-13, 2016 commune, Varin ~o find out for 159 Villagers !April 18 to May 6, District !Ethnic 12016 Minorities/IP Siem ReapSiem Reap, and Phnom Penh !April 11, 2016 Woth Slaeng, Chi rro discuss and Commune Council ,AM) Kraeng Commune, iexplain Social and Member 14 Vice Chikraeng District !Environmental Village Chiefs from !April 10, 2016 Safeguards and 10 villages, and 31 Siem ReapRolum iconduct capacity villagers from the 10 Run Thmey village, ineed assessment. villages. Sre Noy commune, Varin District rro conduct Village Chief, 3 iscreening exercise Group Leaders, and Siem Reap ~o find out for 159 Villagers !Ethnic [Minorities/IP !April 11, 2016 (PM) LeangDai To discuss and Commune Council Commune, Angkor explain Social and Chief, Member, I0 !April 11, 2016 rrhom District Environmental Village Chiefs, and (AM) Safeguards and Saving Leaders from Siem ReapWoth conduct capacity 7 Villages, and 16 Slaeng, Chi Kraeng need assessment rvillages K::ommune, K:;hikraeng District To discuss and Commune Council explain Social and [Member 14 Vice Siem Reap Environmental ~illage Chiefs from Safeguards and 10 villages, and 31 conduct capacity villagers from the 10 need assessment. villages. April 12, 2016 Kantuot Commune, To conduct Commune Chief, Svay Leu District iscreening exercise Member, Clerk, ~o find out for Assistant, Village I Page 60 P153591 LEAP- Resettlemet Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 April 11, 2016 (PM) Siem ReapLeang Ethnic Chief, and 8 Dai Commune, Minorities/IP. villagers Angkor Thom !District To discuss and Commune Council explain Social and Chief, Member, I0 Siem Reap Environmental Village Chiefs, and Safeguards and Saving Leaders from conduct capacity 7 Villages, and 16 ineed assessment villages V\pril 20, 2016 Provincial Hall Lessons Learned LEAP team Workshop: to members from the !April 12, 2016 Siem Reap, Kantuot identify revisions Siem Reap ~ommune, Svay ~o LEAP design [Provincial Leu District documents based K}overnment, other Siem Reap on pilot lessons ~rovincial line ~epartment rro conduct representatives, screening exercise ADBandNGOs ~o find out for Ethnic Commune Chief, Minorities/IP. Member, Clerk, Assistant, Village Chief, and 8 villagers V\pril 21, 2016 Woth Kampong rr0 present the 4 Commune Council AM) Phluk, Kampong 1Project design, Members, 3 Village IPhluk Commune, iconfirm demand Chiefs, Vice Village !April 20, 2016 IPrasat Bakong iand seek feedback Chief, and 18 District Villagers from 3 Lessons Learned villages Siem Workshop: to ReapProvincial Hall identify revisions "'-'EAP team to LEAP design members from the Siem Reap documents based Siem Reap on pilot lessons Provincial Government, other ~rovincial line department representatives, ADBand NGOs April 21 , 2016 (PM) Sasar Sdam To present the [Village Chief and Commune, Puok project design, [Vice Village Chief !April 21 , 2016 !District confirm demand !from 12 villages, 25 AM) ~nd seek feedback rvillagers from 12 Siem ReapWoth villages4 Commune IK.ampong Phluk, rro present the Council Members, 3 [Kampong Phluk project design, Village Chiefs, Vice Commune, Prasat confirm demand Village Chief, and Bakong District ~nd seek feedback 18 Villagers from 3 Siem Reap villages !April 22,2016 Mr. Proun's house, rro present the Vice Commune Preah Oak Village, proje.ct desi1rn, Chief, Member, ! Page 61 P153591 LEAP- Resettlemet Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 [April 21, 2016 (PM) Preak Oak confirm demand Clerk, Village Chief, Commune, Banteay ~nd seek feedback Vice Village Chief, Srei District and 26 villagers. rro present the Siem ReapSasar project design, Village Chief and Sdam Commune, confirm demand Vice Village Chief Puok District and seek feedback from 12 villages, 25 villagers from 12 Siem Reap villages April 29, 2016 World.Bank Office Lessons Le&rned with Urban Poor workshop to hear NGOs, DPs and April 22,2016 Phnom PenhMr. and share Technical Line Proun's house, examples of good !Departments Preah Oak Village, practices in IPreak Oak identifying and !Vice Commune K:ommune, Banteay targeting poor K:hief, Member, Srei District households and Clerk, Village Chief, communities Vice Village Chief, Siem Reap and 26 villagers. rro present the project design, K;onfirm demand ~nd seek feedback !April 29, 2016 World Bank Office Lessons Learned with Urban Poor ~orkshop to hear ~Gos, DPs and Phnom Penh ~nd share Technical Line ~xamples of good Departments practices in identifying and targeting poor households and communities ~uly 21, 2016 DounKaev Present overall 50 people from Commune, LEAP design, commune councils, benefits, risks and Village chiefs, and Puok District Siem proposed villagers Reap safeguard arrangements. Seek community feedback July 22, 2016 Anlong Samnar Present overall 27 people from Commune, Chi LEAP design, commune councils, July 21, 2016 Kraeng District benefits, risks and Village chiefs, and proposed villagers50 people Siem ReapDoun safeguard from commune Kaev Commune, arrangements. councils, Village Puok District Siem Seek community chiefs, and villagers Reap feedbackPresent overall LEAP design, benefits, risks and proposed safeguard arrangements. I Page 62 I Pl53591 LEAP- Resettlemet Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 Seek community feedback July 27, 2016 (8.30- Sen Sok 1 Village, Present overall 16 people from 10.30am) Sangkat Khmounh, LEAP design, Official Khan, and 6 Khan Sen Sok, , benefits, risks and difference July 22, 2016 Phnom PenhAnlong proposed Communities27 Samnar Commune, safeguard people from Chi Kraeng District arrangements. commune councils, Seek community Village chiefs, and Siem Reap feedbackPresent ~illagers · overall LEAP design, benefits, ~isks and proposed safeguard ~rangements. Seek community feedback July 27, 2016 Sangkat Trapeang Present overall 23 people from (10.30-12.00pm) Krasang, Khan Por LEAP design, Sangkat, and 9 Sen Chey, , Phnom benefits, risks and difference July 27, 2016 (8.30- PenhSen Sok 1 proposed Communities 16 10.30am) Village, Sangkat safeguard people from Official Khmounh, Khan arrangements. Khan,, and 6 Sen Sok, , Phnom Seek community difference Penh feedbackPresent Communities overall LEAP design, benefits, risks and proposed safeguard arrangements. Seek community feedback ~uly 28, 20 16 Sangkat Praek Present overall f4 l people from (8.30am-1 O.OOam) iPhnov, Khan Praek LEAP design, Sangkat, and 4 CTuly 27, 2016 IPhnov benefits, risks and difference ' 10.30-12.00pm) proposed Communities23 Phnom PenhSangkat ~afeguard people from rrrapeang Krasang, ~rrangements. Sangkat, and 9 Khan Por Sen Chey, Seek community difference , Phnom Penh feedback Communities Present overall LEAP design, benefits, risks and proposed safeguard arrangements. Seek community feedback July 28, 20 16 Sangkat Svay Pak, Present overall 9 people Official (10.30-12.00pm) Khan Russey Keo LEAP design, Khan, Sangkat, and Phnom PenhSangkat benefits, risks and 1 community 4 1 proposed people from I Page 63 P153591 LEAP- Resett/emet Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 July 28, 2016 Praek Phnov, Khan safeguard Sangkat, and 4 (8.30am-10.00am) Praek Phnov arrangements. difference Seek community Communities Phnom Penh lfe·edback Present overall LEAP design, benefits, risks and proposed safeguard arrangements. Seek community feedback lTuly 28, 2016 Sangkat Svay Pak, Present overall 9 people Official 10.30-12.00pm) Khan Russey Keo !LEAP design, Khan, Sangkat, and Phnom Penh benefits, risks and 1 community tproposed ~afeguard arrangements. Seek community feedback September 15, 2016 World Bank, Phnom [Discussion of Representatives of 4 Penh safeguard different CSOs arrangements and mainly working in !Overall project Phnom Penh ldesign issues with Social Safeguard Specialist September 22, 2016 Phnom Penh Capital Present overall 1 PPC Deputy !Hall LEAP Status of Governor, PPC Safeguard, Officials LEAP Procurement, FM Members, Official andAWPB target Sangkats and Khans, and concern PPC Technical Departments November 8, 2016 Sangkat Dankor, Informal foformal discussion !Khan Dankor, discussion of with leader of Urban Phnom Penh community needs, Poor Community, seeking feedback Sangkat Councilor on proposed and others project activities November 8, 2016 Sangkat Prey Veng, Informal Informal discussion Khan Dankor, kliscussion of with leader of Urban Phnom Penh ~ommunity needs, Poor Community, seeking feedback Sangkat Councilor Pnproposed and others project activities November 11, 2016 Wodd Bank Office, Present overall !Representatives of 7 Phnom Penh LEAP design, different CSOs benefits, risks and operating in either proposed I P age 64 P153591 LEAP - Resettlemet Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 safeguard Phnom Penh or arrangements. Siem Reap, or both. Seek feedback from civil society organizations Sept 15,2016 World Bank, MRl , Consultation 6 people from civil Phnom Penh meeting with CSO society NGOs to learn about their safeguards implementation ~nd discuss on LEAP safeguard arrangements. Nov 8, 2016 Sangkat Dankor and Informal 48 people from Prey Veng, Khan discussion of Sangkat Councilors, Dankor, Phnom community needs, Urban Poor Penh seeking feedback Communities, on proposed Village Chiefs, project activities community leaders, including ESMF villagers, LEAP andRPF. PPC team and WB Team, include PM on Agr and Program Leader). Nov 11, 2016 World Bank Office, Consultative 14 people from 7 Phnom Penh meeting with NGOs, MOI, Bank CSOs to seek for team. comments and feedback on LEAP overall project design, risks management and safeguard ~rrangements. Dec 13, 2016 Khan Dankor, IField visit to 30 people from Sangkat Dankor and kliscuss with urban Sangkat Councilors, Prey Veng, Phnom poor communities Urban Poor Penh ~bout problems Communities, ~nd issues, the Village Chiefs, support needed, as community leaders, well as safeguards villagers, LEAP issues. PPC team and WB Team include Bank Country Director). Dec. 28, 2016 Phnom Penh Hotel, Consultative 60 people from 13 in Phnom Penh meeting to Sangkat and 11 disseminate and Khan, PPC team, obtain feedback on MOI, NGOs, LEAP project Development design; on environmental and I Page 65 P1.53591. LEAP- Resettlemet Policy Framework, December 22, 201.6 social safeguard Donors, and instruments. Australian Embassy. Dec. 29, 2016 Khemara Angkor Consultative 83 people from 47 Hotel, in Siem Reap meeting to communes, 9 province. disseminate and districts, PPC team, obtain feedback on MOI team and LEAP project NGOs in Siem Reap design; on province. environmental and social safeguard instruments. I Page 66 P153591 LEAP- Resettlemet Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 Consultations and Disclosures a. Consultations: When/Date Location/Place Lamma2e Who/Participants What/documents Conclusions/Remarks October Slaeng Pagoda, Khmer 200 participants Field visit at list of participants on 31,2015 Chi Kraeng and (WB Vice Chikraeng District file of Vice President Commune, English President, WB Siem Reap Visited Chikraeng Team, National province to learn District Team, SHG LEAP pilot and to Siem Reap members, and assess the villagers). sunnorts needed. Nov 30, World Bank, English 7 participants Meeting to list of participants on 2015 MR2 (LEAP director & discuss the file ofldentification Phnom Penh manager, WB safeguards. Mission Safeguards Specialists, TTLs, World Bank safeguards framework used. and Bank Team members). Dec4, Siem Reap Khmer 6 participants Field visit list of participants on 2015 Provincial Hall and (LEAP provincial Meeting to file English team, WB discuss the ofldentification Safeguards Team). safeguards Mission compliance of World Bank safeguards LEAP. framework used Dees, Krabei Riel Khmer 95 participants Consultative list of participants on 2015 Commune - and (commune and meeting to discuss file ofldentification Siem Reap English village authorities, the safeguards Mission District and SHG leaders and issues and causes LeangDai members, affected and Commune - Villagers, safeguards Angkor Thom community leaders, prevention district, Siem LEAP provincial measures. Reap province. team, WB safeguards team) Dec6, Slaeng Pagoda, Khmer 49 participants Consultative list of participants on 2015 Chi Kraeng and (commune and meeting to discuss file ofldentification Commune, English village authorities, the safeguards Mission Chikraeng SHG leaders and issues and causes District members, affected and Siem Reap. Villagers, safeguards community leaders, prevention LEAP provincial measures. team, WB safeguards team) Dec 7, World Bank, English 7 participants Meeting to brief list of participants on 2015 MR2Phnom (LEAP director & safeguard issues file ofldentification Penh manager - MOI, finding in Siem Mission WB Safeguards Reap and discuss Specialists, TTLs, World Bank safeguards safeguards framework used and Bank Team prevention members). measures. Dec7, World Bank, English 13 participants Consultative list of participants on 2015 MRI Phnom (NGOs, WB meeting with file ofldentification Penh Safeguards NGOsto Mission Specialists, TTLs, brainstorm and and Bank Team discuss the members). experiences of NGO on I P age 67 P1.53591. LEAP- Resettlemet Policy Framework1 December 221 201.6 safeguards implementation. April 10, Rolum Run Khmer 159 participants Meeting to list of participants on 2016 Thmey village, and (Villagers, discuss the social file of Preparation Sre Noy English community leaders, and environmental Mission commune, Varin Village chiefs, safeguards and District, Siem CCs, WB conduct screening Reap safeguards exercise to find specialist, LEAP out for IP. national & SRP team, and WB Team) April 11, Slaeng Pagoda, Khmer 54 participants Meeting to list of participants on 2016 (am) Chi Kraeng and (commune and discuss and file of Preparation Commune, English Village Chiefs, explain Social and Mission Chikraeng SHG members, Environmental District, Siem villagers, LEAP Safeguards and Reap provincial team and conduct capacity WBTeam). need assessment. April 11, LeangDai Khmer 36 participants Meeting to list of participants on 2016 (pm) Commune, and (commune and discuss and file of Preparation Angkor Thom English Village Chiefs, explain Social and Mission District, Siem SHG members, Environmental Reap province villagers, LEAP Safeguards and provincial team and conduct capacity WB Team). need assessment. April 12, Kantuot Khmer 20 participants Meeting to list of participants on 2016 (am) Commune, Svay and (Commune Chief, discuss and file of Preparation Leu District, English CC members, explain Social and Mission Siem Reap village chiefs and Environmental Province villagers and WB Safeguards; Team). conduct capacity need assessment; and conduct screening exercise to find out for IP. April 12, Siem Reap Khmer 5 participants Meeting to list of participants on 2016 (pm) Provincial Hall and (Siem Reap prepare simplified file of Preparation English Safeguards focal pest management Mission point, Bank (PMP) and Safeguards revised ESMF. Specialists, TTL and WB Team). April 21, Kampong Phluk Khmer 87 participants Field visit for the list of participants on 2016 Commune, Soutr and (Commune Chiefs, consultative file of Preparation Nikum District English CC members, meeting to discuss Mission and Sasar Sdom Village Chiefs, and explain Social Commune, Puok villagers, LEAP and District, Siem National and Environmental Reap Province provincial teams Safeguards; and WB Team). conduct capacity need assessment. April 22, Anlong Samnar Khmer 47 participants Field visit for the list of participants on 2016 Commune, and (Commune Chiefs, consultative file of Preparation Chikreng English CC members, meeting to discuss Mission District, Siem Village Chiefs, and explain Social Reap Province villagers, LEAP and National and Environmental I P age 68 P153591 LEAP - Resettlemet Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 provincial teams Safeguards; and WB Team). conduct capacity need assessment. April 29 World Bank, English 15 participants Meeting to brief list of participants on 2016 MRI Phnom (LEAPMOI, safeguard issues file of Preparation Penh MAFF, PPC, WB finding in Siem Mission Safeguards Reap and discuss World Bank safeguards Specialists, TTLs, onESMF and framework used. and Bank Team RPF preparation. members). July 21, Doun Kaev Khmer 58 participants Field visit for the list of participants on 2016 Commune, Puok and (Commune Chiefs, consultative file of Technical District, Siem English CC members, meeting to discuss Support Mission Reap Village Chiefs, and explain Social villagers, LEAP and National and Environmental provincial teams Safeguards. and WB Team). July 22, Anlong Samnar Khmer 40 participants Field visit for the list of participants on 2016 Commune, and (Commune Chiefs, consultative file of Technical Chikreng English CC members, meeting to discuss Support Mission District, Siem Village Chiefs, and explain Social Reap villagers, LEAP and National and Environmental provincial teams Safeguards. and WB Team). July 27, Sangkat Khmer 29 participants Field visit for the list of participants on 2016 Khmuonh, Khan and (Sangkat consultative file of Technical Sen Sok and English Councilors, Village meeting to discuss Support Mission Sangkat Chiefs, villagers, and explain Social Trapaing LEAP PPC team and Krasang, Khan and WB Team). Environmental Por Sen Chey, Safeguards. Phnom Penh. July 28, Sangkat Prek Khmer 49 participants Field visit for the list of participants on 2016 Phnov, Khan and (Sangkat consultative file ofTechnical Prek Phnov and English Councilors, CC meeting to discuss Support Mission Sangkat Svay members, Village and explain Social Pak, Khan Chiefs, villagers, and Russey Keo, LEAP PPC team Environmental Phnom Penh. and WB Team). Safeguards. Sept 15, World Bank, English 6 participants Consultation list of participants on 2016 MRl ,Phnom (NGOsand WB meeting with CSO file of Stakeholder Penh Team) to learn about Meeting on Safeguards their safeguards implementation and discuss on LEAP safeguard arrangements. Nov8, Sangkat Dankor Khmer 48 participants Informal list of participants on 2016 and Prey Veng, and (Sangkat discussion of file ofManagement Khan Dankor, English Councilors, Urban community needs, Review and next step on Poor Communities, LEAP Appraisal Phnom Penh seeking feedback Package Village Chiefs, on proposed community leaders, project activities villagers, LEAP including ESMF PPC team and WB andRPF. I P age 69 P153591 LEAP- Resettlemet Policy Framework, December 22, 2016 Team, include PM on Agr and Program Leader). Nov 11, World Bank Khmer 14 participants Consultative list of participants on 2016 Office, Phnom and (representatives meeting with file of LEAP Civil Penh English from 7NG0s, CSOs to seek for Society Consultations MOI, Bank team). comments and feedback on LEAP overall project design, risks management and safeguard arrangements. Dec 13, Khan Dankor, Khmer 30 participants Field visit to 2016 Sangkat Dankor and from Sangkat discuss with urban and Prey Veng, English Councilors, Urban poor communities Phnom Penh Poor Communities, about problems Village Chiefs, and issues, the community leaders, support needed, as villagers, LEAP well as safeguards PPC team and WB issues. Team include Bank CM and CD). Dec. 28, Phnom Penh Khmer 60 participants Consultative list of participants on 2016 Hotel, in Phnom and from 13 Sangkat meeting to file of LEAP Penh English and 11 Khan, disseminate and consultations meeting in PPCH,MOI, obtain feedback PPC. NGOs, on LEAP project International design; on donors, and environmental and Australian social safeguard Embassy. instruments. Dec. 29, Khemara Angkor Khmer 83 participants Consultative list of participants on 2016 Hotel, in Siem from 47 meeting to file of LEAP Reap province. communes, 9 disseminate and consultations meeting in districts, PPC, obtain feedback Siem Reap province. MOI,NGOsin on LEAP project Siem Reap design; on province. environmental and social safeguard instruments. b. Disclosures: When/Date Location/Place Language What/documents Disclosure 29 September MOI website English LEAP ESMF and RPF 2016 Re-disclosure 18 November MOI website English LEAP ESMF and RPF 2016 Re-disclosure 29 November MOI website English and Khmer LEAP ESMF and RPF 2016 I Page 70