ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) Project number: JKTD17002 Table of Contents APPENDIX A DECREE REGENT OF WEST MANGGARAI - EAST NUSA TENGGARA PROVINCE NUMBER 170 / KEP / HK / 2016 ........................................................................................................... A APPENDIX B SUMMARY OF WEST MANGGARAI REGENCY REGULATION NUMBER 9 OF 2012 AND HEAD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND RESETTLEMENTS AGENCY LETTER NO PUPR 760/477/ VI/2018................................................................................................................................................... B APPENDIX C HEAD OF REGIONAL PUBLIC WORKS AND SPATIAL PLANNING AGENCY (PUPR) OF WEST MANGGARAI REGENCY LETTERS ................................................................................... C APPENDIX D INDONESIAN LEGISLATIONS ...................................................................................... D APPENDIX E GENERAL LAYOUT AND INFRASTRUCTURE .............................................................E APPENDIX F WAESANO PROJECT SCHEDULE ................................................................................ F APPENDIX G FORESTRY DATA AND INFORMATION ....................................................................... G APPENDIX H STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN ....................................................................... H APPENDIX I COMMUNITY BASELINE PROFILE.................................................................................. I APPENDIX J GEOLOGY MAP............................................................................................................... J APPENDIX K SENSITIVITY MAP BY PARAMETER ............................................................................ K APPENDIX L PRELIMINARY LARAP REPORT ................................................................................... L Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) Appendix A Decree Regent of West Manggarai - East Nusa Tenggara Province Number 170 / KEP / HK / 2016 Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM A ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) Appendix B Summary of West Manggarai Regency Regulation Number 9 of 2012 and Head of Public Works and Resettlements Agency Letter No PUPR 760/477/VI/2018 Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM B SUMMARY OF WEST MANGGARAI REGENCY REGULATION NUMBER 9 OF 2012 ON THE SPATIAL PLANNING OF WEST MANGGARAI 2012 - 2032 Scope of area for spatial planning of West Manggarai is approximately 9,450 km2 and consists of 10 sub-districts, namely Komodo, Boleng, Sano Nggoang, Mbeliling, Lembor, Lembor Selatan, Welak, Kuwus, Ndoso, and Macang Pacar. Spatial planning policies and strategies are explained in this regulation. Furthermore, the regional spatial structure plan is including (a) Network system for Activity Center; (b) Network system for Main Infrastructure; and (c) Network system for other infrastructures. The Network system for other infrastructure consists of energy, telecommunication, and water resource network systems, as well as environmental management infrastructure system. The Waesano geothermal exploration project is mentioned explicitly in Part 4 Paragraph 1 on Energy Network System Article 13 Number 2.e which states regarding Sano Nggoang geothermal power plant as One of the power plants planned in West Manggarai. The complete document can be found in website of West Manggarai Regency (http://www.jdih.manggaraibaratkab.go.id/cmdownloads/perda-kabupaten-manggarai-barat- nomor-9-tahun-2012/view/download.php?page=peraturan&act=listperaturan&id=56) ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) Appendix C Head of Regional Public Works and Spatial Planning Agency (PUPR) of West Manggarai Regency Letters  PUPR Letter No. PUPR.620/BM/946/V/2018 on Statement of Support for Access Road Land Acquisition fro Geothermal Exploration Drilling Project in Sano Nggoang Lake  PUPR Letter No. PUPR.760/477/VI/2018 on Spatial Suitability Letter (SKTR) Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM C ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) Appendix D Indonesian Legislations Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM D Indonesian Legislation National Level The Government of Indonesia (GOI) issues numerous national regulations (as listed below) including laws, Government Regulations (GR), presidential decrees, ministerial decrees and regulations; to ensure that all major development activities can be managed sustainably with regards to environmental protection and conservation. Laws  Law No. 5 of 1960 on Basic Provisions of Agrarian Regulation – relevant reference for reviewing the land tenure status within the geothermal area;  Law No. 1 of 1970 on Work Safety – relevant reference for work safety issue;  Law No. 5 of 1990 on Natural Resources Conservation and Ecosystem – relevant reference for reviewing the environmental baseline and assessing the potential affected habitat;  Law No. 5 of 1994 on Ratification on the UN Convention relating Biodiversity – relevant reference for reviewing preservation of biodiversity around the project area;  Law No. 41 of 1999 on Forestry (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Of 1999 No. 167, State Gazette Supplement No. 3888) as amended by Law No. 19 Of 2004 – relevant reference for assessing the project impacts to forest within the study area;  Law No. 13 of 2003 on the Workforce – relevant reference for workforce issue;  Law No. 7 of 2004 on Water Resources – relevant reference for assessing the hydrological impact within the study area;  Law No. 26 of 2007 on Spatial Planning – relevant reference for spatial analysis during impact assessment;  Law No. 30 of 2007 on Energy – relevant reference for energy review, including renewable energy policy for geothermal;  Law No. 18 of 2008 on Waste Management – relevant reference for company’s right and responsibility on waste management of the project;  Law No. 22 of 2009 on Traffic and Road – relevant reference for review vehicle and road traffic management plan;  Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environment Protection and Management – relevant reference for AMDAL and ESIA study.  Law No. 36 of 2009 on Health – relevant reference for reviewing the health program;  Law No. 11 of 2010 on Cultural Heritage – relevant reference for reviewing the impact on socio-culture aspect;  Law No. 21 of 2014 on Geothermal – relevant reference for reviewing geothermal permitting terms;  Law No. 23 of 2014 on Regional Government – relevant reference for institutional framework in environmental management at regional level;  Law No. 37 of 2014 on Land and Water Conservation – relevant reference for land function issue and implementation of conservation. Government Regulation  GR No. 7 of 1999 on Flora and Fauna Conservation – relevant reference for biological review;  GR No. 41 of 1999 on Air Pollution Control – relevant reference for reviewing air quality baseline and impact assessment;  GR No. 25 of 2000 on Central and Regional Government Authority – relevant reference for formulating management and monitoring plans, especially which is related to the institutional aspect;  GR No. 74 of 2001 on Hazardous Material Management – relevant reference for reviewing project component on hazardous material management;  GR No. 82 of 2001 on Water Quality Management and Water Pollution Control – relevant reference for reviewing surface water quality baseline and assessing potential water quality impacts;  GR No. 16 of 2004 on Land Use – relevant reference for reviewing land use, land usage and land acquisition by project activities;  GR No. 38 of 2007 on Distribution of Power among the Central Government, the Provincial Government and the Regency/Municipal Government – relevant reference for reviewing the authority of national and local government;  GR No. 26 of 2008 on National Spatial Planning – relevant reference for spatial analysis on the proposed project activity;  GR No. 43 of 2008 on Groundwater – relevant reference for reviewing groundwater management and pollution control;  GR No. 76 of 2008 on Forest Rehabilitation and Reclamation – relevant reference for reviewing rehabilitation and reclamation plan;  GR No. 10 of 2010 on Procedures for Changing of Forest Use and Function – relevant reference for reviewing impact from changing on forest use and function;  GR No. 15 of 2010 on Implementation of Spatial Planning – concerning change of land use in spatial planning processes;  GR No. 24 of 2010 on Utilization of Forest Area – relevant reference for reviewing procedure for forest area application.  GR No. 28 of 2011 on Natural Reserve and Natural Conservation Area Management – relevant reference for reviewing the impact on ecological aspect, especially flora and fauna.  GR No. 38 of 2011 on Rivers – relevant reference for reviewing all water utilization from the river;  GR No. 27 of 2012 on Environmental Permit – relevant reference for preparation of AMDAL and UKL-UPL prior to obtaining Environmental Permit;  GR No. 50 of 2012 on Implementation of Safety and Occupational Health Management System – relevant reference for occupational health management system guideline during construction and operation activities;  GR No. 101 of 2014 on Hazardous and Toxic (B3) Waste Management – relevant reference for reviewing management of hazardous and toxic wastes;  GR No. 44 of 2015 on Implementation Program of Occupational Accident Insurance and Life Insurance for Daily Freelance Workers, Contract Workers and Specified Time Employment Agreement in The Construction Services Sector – relevant reference for workforce issue during construction activity;  GR No. 104 of 2015 on Procedures for Changing of Forest Use and Function – relevant reference for reviewing the impact of the changing of forest use and function;  GR No. 7 of 2017 on Geothermal Activities for Indirect Use – relevant reference for reviewing technical and administration requirements for geothermal activities. Presidential Decree  Presidential Decree No. 32 of 1990 on Protected Area Management – relevant reference for project management activity within the protected areas. Presidential Regulation  Presidential Regulation No. 14 of 2017 on the Acceleration of Electricity Infrastructure Development – relevant reference to have significant influence to any energy infrastructure development, including geothermal. Ministerial Decree  Minister of Transportation Decree No. 69 of 1993 on Freight Transport on the Road – relevant reference for reviewing public road utilization associated to the transportation of material and equipment.  Minister of Environment Decree No. KEP-13/MENLH/3/1995 on Emission Standard for Stationery Sources – relevant reference for review air quality parameter and impacts management;  Minister of Environment Decree No. KEP-48/MENLH/11/1996 on Noise Level Standard – relevant reference for reviewing noise baseline and impact analysis;  Minister of Environment Decree No. KEP-49/MENLH/11/1996 on Vibration Level Standard – relevant reference for reviewing vibration and impact to public health;  Minister of Environment Decree No. KEP-50/MENLH/11/1996 on Odour Level Standard – relevant reference for reviewing ambient odour (especially for H2S);  Minister of Environment Decree No. 37 of 2003 on Surface Water Quality Analysis Method and Sampling – relevant reference for reviewing surface water quality for environmental baseline;  Minister of Environment Decree No. 45 of 2005 on Guidelines of RKL and RPL Reporting – relevant reference for reviewing implementation of Environmental management and monitoring plan (RKL -RPL);  Directorate General of Industrial Relations and Social Assurance of Manpower No. KEP.611/PHIJSK- PKKAD/X/2009 on Social and Health Assurance for Worker – relevant to worker health and safety. Ministerial Regulation  Minister of Public Works Regulation No. 45 of 1990 on Water Quality Control in Water Resources – relevant reference for reviewing control and monitoring of water quality from the project activities;  Minister of Public Works Regulation No. 48 of 1990 on Water and/or Water Source Management in River – relevant reference for surface water management;  Minister of Health Regulation No. 416 of 1990 on Water Quality Requirement and Supervision – relevant reference for reviewing groundwater quality in the surrounding area;  Minister of Mining and Energy Regulation No. 6 of 1991 on Inspection of Occupational Safety on Installation, Equipment, and Techniques Utilized in Oil and Gas Mining and Exertion of Geothermal Resources – relevant reference for occupational safety on installation, equipment, and techniques utilized inspection;  Minister of Environment Regulation No. 13 of 2007 on Requirement and Procedure of Upstream Oil and Gas and Geothermal Business and/or Activities Wastewater Management by Injection – relevant reference for reviewing procedure of wastewater management on exploration activities by injection;  Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation No. 2 of 2009 on Guideline of Geothermal Preliminary Survey Assignment – relevant reference for reviewing the requirements of geothermal preliminary survey;  Minister of Environment Regulation No. 8 of 2009 on Wastewater Quality Standards for Thermal Power Plant Business and/or Activity – relevant reference for geothermal wastewater quality standard;  Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation No. 11 of 2009 on Guideline of Geothermal Business Activities – relevant reference for requirements of geothermal business activities;  Minister of Environment Regulation No. 18 of 2009 on Permitting Procedures for Toxic and Hazardous Waste Management – relevant reference for reviewing permitting procedures and requirement for hazardous waste management;  Minister of Environment Regulation No. 33 of 2009 on Procedures for Land Recovery from Toxic and Hazardous Waste Contamination – relevant reference for reviewing hazardous waste management which is produced by planned activities;  Minister of Environment Regulation No. 19 of 2010 on Wastewater Quality Standards for Oil, Gas and Geothermal Business and/or Activities – relevant reference for reviewing standard for wastewater from brine and drainage wastewater;  Minister of Health Regulation No. 492/MENKES/PER/VIV of 2010 On Qualification of Drinking Water Quality – relevant reference for reviewing drinking water parameter and measures to manage environmental impact to the drinking water sources;  Minister of Environment Regulation No. 5 of 2012 on Type of Business/Activity Plan Compulsory to have Environmental Impact Assessment – relevant reference to define whether the activity will require an EIA or not;  Minister of Environment Regulation No. 16 of 2012 on Guideline of Environmental Documents Preparation – relevant reference for UKL/UPL preparation;  Minister of Environment Regulation No. 17 of 2012 on Guideline of Community Involvement in Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Permit – relevant reference for project socialization to the surrounding community;  Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation No. 18 of 2012 on Amendment to Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation No. 11 of 2009 on Guideline of Geothermal Business Activities – relevant reference for requirements of geothermal business activities;  Minister of Environment Regulation No. 8 of 2013 on Procedure of Assessment of Environmental Document and Environmental Permit Issuance – relevant reference for the assessment of environmental document and environmental permit issuance;  Minister of Environment Regulation No. 14 of 2013 on Symbols and Labelling of Hazardous and Toxic Waste – relevant reference for hazardous waste management, particular for hazardous waste storage;  Minister of Environment Regulation No. 5/2014 on Wastewater Quality Standard – relevant for wastewater standard effluent, includes on geothermal activities.  Minister of Public Works Regulation No. 37 of 2015 on Water Use Permit and/or Water Source – relevant reference for reviewing water source use for activity plan;  Minister of Public Works Regulation No. 26 of 2015 on Diversion of River Flow and/or Spatial Use of Former-River – relevant reference for reviewing river and lake use;  Minister of Manpower Regulation No. 26 of 2015 on Guideline of Work Accident, Death and Pension Assurance for Worker – relevant reference for reviewing health and safety aspect;  Minister of Public Works Regulation No. 28 of 2015 on Determination of River and Lake Boundaries – relevant reference for reviewing river and lake use;  Minister of Environment and Forestry Regulation No. 46 of 2016 on Use of Geothermal in National Park, City Forest Park and Natural Park Area – relevant reference to obtain geothermal use permit in national park, city forest park and natural park area;  Minister of Industry Regulation No.04 of 2016 on the Technical Guidelines for Industrial Area ;  Minister of Environment and Forestry Regulation No. 68 of 2016 on Domestic Wastewater Quality Standard – relevant reference for reviewing domestic wastewater quality in project area;  Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation No. 21 of 2017 on Drilling Mud Waste and Drilling Cuttings Management on Geothermal Activities – relevant reference for reviewing management of drilling mud and drilling cuttings of drilling activities;  Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation No. 37 of 2017 on Geothermal Work Area for Indirect Use – relevant reference to determine criteria of study and data processing on the work area preparation of geothermal business activities;  Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation No. 9553/03/MEM.E/2017 on Proposed Activity Location for Provision of Geothermal Data and Information - the Waesano is one of the prospective geothermal areas of government drilling scheme;  Minister of Finance Regulation No. 62/PMK.08/2017 on Fund Management of Infrastructure Financing for the Geothermal Sector (PISP) - which calls for the provision of geothermal data and information on behalf of the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources. Head of BAPEDAL (Environmental Impact Management Agency) Decree  Head of BAPEDAL Decree No. KEP-056/BAPEDAL/1994 on Guideline to Determine Significance Scale of Environmental Impacts – most relevant reference for reviewing important and significance impacts.  Head of BAPEDAL Decree No. KEP-01/BAPEDAL/09/1995 on Procedures and Requirements for Storage and Collection of Hazardous and Toxic Waste – relevant for evaluation of hazardous material disposal;  Head of BAPEDAL Decree No. KEP-02/BAPEDAL/09/1995 on Hazardous and Toxic (B3) Waste Manifest – reference for evaluating B3 wastes management and proposed plan;  Head of BAPEDAL Decree No. KEP-03/BAPEDAL/09/1995 on Technical Requirements on Hazardous and Toxic (B3) Waste Management – reference for preparing Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan;  Head of BAPEDAL Decree No. KEP-205/BAPEDAL/07/1996 on Technical Guideline to Manage Air Pollution of Stationary Sources – relevance for evaluation of air quality pollution potential. Regional Level  East Nusa Tenggara Province Regulation No. 3 of 2003 on Hydrology Management – relevant reference to assess the impact on hydrology;  East Nusa Tenggara Province Regulation No. 5 of 2008 on Integrated Watershed Area Management – relevant reference to assess the impact on watershed area;  East Nusa Tenggara Province Regulation No. 1 of 2011 on East Nusa Tenggara Province Spatial Planning 2010 – 2030 – relevant reference to ensure compliance on the province spatial planning;  West Manggarai Regency Regulation No. 9 of 2012 on West Manggarai Regency Spatial Planning 2012 – 2032 – relevant reference to ensure compliance on the regency spatial planning;  West Manggarai Regency Regulation No. 12 of 2012 on Solid Waste Management – relevant reference to evaluate solid waste management plan which is not specified as hazardous waste . ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) Appendix E General Layout and Infrastructure Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 LEGEND: NOTE PROCUREMENT LAND BOUNDARY DATUM IS WGS 84 ZONE 51S NEW PAD AND ROAD OUTLINE N A A EXISTING EASEMENT EXISTING ROAD CENTERLINE EXISTING PAVEMENT TO WELLPAD WS-D PROPOSED PAVEMENT WIDENING LAND TO BE PROCURED CULVERT BENCH MARK PEG B B PEG COORDINATE TABLE PHASE-1 EASTING NORTHING POINT (m) (m) EXISTING ROAD TO BE UPGRADED G1 169 563.95 9 036 505.16 TO LABUAN G2 169 538.12 9 036 503.00 BAJO G3 169 541.31 9 036 444.66 G4 169 534.13 9 036 393.51 C C LOCATION: K:\3 - PROJECT\JKTD17002 - Wae Sano Geothermal Exploration Site for PT SMI\4 - Technical Work Area\2 - Client Documents\9 - Jacobs Doc\Jacobs 22 December 2017\LAND DRAWINGS\Dwg\DRILLING BASE CAMP AREA, ROAD TO WELL PAD WS-D JUNCTION AND WTP AREA 2.dwg G5 169 552.80 9 036 371.10 G6 169 560.17 9 036 386.99 G1 G7 169 572.73 9 036 400.45 G8 G8 169 582.79 9 036 424.45 G2 G7 G9 169 565.50 9 036 347.53 G21 G15 G10 169 577.17 9 036 324.31 G6 G11 G16 G11 169 594.94 9 036 305.47 D G3 G9 G10 D G12 G12 169 595.06 9 036 278.68 DRILLING NEW G13 169 590.47 9 036 272.37 G13 G5 BASE CAMP DRILLING ACCESS ROAD DRILLING WATER TREATMENT AREA BASE CAMP G4 G17 AREA 2 PHASE-2 AREA G14 169 643.37 9 036 076.20 PHASE-1 G18 G15 169 704.66 9 036 095.29 G20 G14 G16 169 727.68 9 036 032.87 G17 169 692.33 9 036 021.84 E G18 169 704.65 9 035 982.38 E G19 G19 169 671.58 9 035 966.88 EXISTING ROAD TO BE UPGRADED PEG COORDINATE TABLE PHASE-2 EASTING NORTHING POINT (m) (m) G20 169 627.24 9 036 119.94 G21 169 685.65 9 036 138.17 F F TO WELLPAD SANONGGOANG WS-B LAKE TOTAL AREA TO BE PROCURED FOR : 1. DRILLING WATER TREATMENT AREA 2 = 2 364 m² 2. DRILLING BASE CAMP AREA PHASE-1 = 5 327 m² G 3. DRILLING BASE CAMP G AREA PHASE-2 = 2 931 m² DATE: 12/28/2017 9:34:00 AM LOGIN NAME: PRATIWI, RENEICA AYU 0 20 40 60 80 100m SCALE 1:1000 (A1) 20 10 PRELIMINARY ISSUE CLIENT TITLE CLIENT CONSULTANT SUPPORTING AGENCIES PT SARANA MULTI INFRASTRUKTUR (PERSERO) H PROJECT DRILLING BASE CAMP AREA, WTP AREA NO. 2, H WAESANO GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION PROJECT PUBLIC ROAD STA. 19+600 AND STA. 19+680 B 15/12/17 HWE MT SAV PRELIMINARY ISSUE DRAWN HSM DRAWING CHECK SM REVIEWED APPROVED LAND PROCUREMENT BOUNDARY SETOUT A 17/11/17 HWE MT SAV PRELIMINARY ISSUE DESIGNED DESIGN REVIEW MT SAV SCALE DRAWING No REV REV DATE DRAWN REV'D APP'D REVISION AN MT DATE DATE 1:1000 (A1) GEUDP-WS-DRG-CIV-135 B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NOTE DATUM IS WGS 84 ZONE 51S TO LABUAN BAJO A N LEGEND: A PROCUREMENT LAND BOUNDARY NEW PAD AND ROAD OUTLINE EXISTING EASEMENT EXISTING ROAD CENTERLINE H2 EXISTING PAVEMENT H1 PROPOSED PAVEMENT WIDENING B B LAND TO BE PROCURED CULVERT H3 PEG COORDINATE TABLE EXISTING ROAD EASTING NORTHING POINT (m) (m) C SPOIL DISPOSAL C AREA NO. 4 H1 171 182.40 9 046 986.93 LOCATION: K:\3 - PROJECT\JKTD17002 - Wae Sano Geothermal Exploration Site for PT SMI\4 - Technical Work Area\2 - Client Documents\9 - Jacobs Doc\Jacobs 22 December 2017\LAND DRAWINGS\Dwg\SPOIL DSIPOSAL AREA NO.4 - LAND PROCUREMENT BOUNDARY SETOUT_RAP.dwg H2 171 220.05 9 046 992.95 H4 H3 171 242.68 9 046 977.79 H4 171 230.55 9 046 944.19 H5 171 192.74 9 046 894.07 H6 H6 171 148.94 9 046 927.17 D D TOTAL AREA TO BE PROCURED FOR : SPOIL DISPOSAL AREA No.4 = 5 361 m² H5 E E F F TO WAESANO G G LOGIN NAME: PRATIWI, RENEICA AYU 0 15 30 45 60 75m SCALE 1:750 (A1) 1512 9 6 3 PRELIMINARY ISSUE CLIENT TITLE CLIENT CONSULTANT SUPPORTING AGENCIES PT SARANA MULTI INFRASTRUKTUR (PERSERO) H PROJECT SPOIL DISPOSAL AREA NO. 4 H DATE: 12/28/2017 11:36:38 AM WAESANO GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION PROJECT LAND PROCUREMENT BOUNDARY SETOUT DRAWN DRAWING CHECK REVIEWED APPROVED HSM SM A 17/11/17 HWE MT SAV PRELIMINARY ISSUE DESIGNED DESIGN REVIEW MT SAV SCALE DRAWING No REV REV DATE DRAWN REV'D APP'D REVISION AN MT DATE DATE 1:750 (A1) GEUDP-WS-DRG-CIV-136 A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NOTES : TO LABUAN DATUM IS WGS'84 ZONE 51S BAJO A N N LEGEND: A PROCUREMENT LAND BOUNDARY NEW PAD AND ROAD OUTLINE EXISTING EASEMENT TO LABUAN BAJO H12 EXISTING ROAD CENTERLINE EXISTING PAVEMENT H13 PROPOSED PAVEMENT WIDENING B EXISTING ROAD B LAND TO BE PROCURED CULVERT EXISTING ROAD H14 SPOIL DISPOSAL AREA NO. 5 PEG COORDINATE TABLE C EASTING NORTHING C LOCATION: K:\3 - PROJECT\JKTD17002 - Wae Sano Geothermal Exploration Site for PT SMI\4 - Technical Work Area\2 - Client Documents\9 - Jacobs Doc\Jacobs 22 December 2017\LAND DRAWINGS\Dwg\SPOIL DISPOSAL AREA NO. 5 AND NO.6 - LAND PROCUREMENT BOUNDARY SETOUT_RAP.dwg POINT (m) (m) H7 171 575.54 9 044 870.54 H8 171 556.90 9 044 837.72 SPOIL DISPOSAL H9 171 600.61 9 044 812.81 AREA NO. 6 H7 H10 171 650.22 9 044 812.38 TO WAESANO H11 171 648.65 9 044 844.54 D D SPOIL DISPOSAL AREA NO. 6 SPOIL DISPOSAL PEG COORDINATE TABLE AREA NO. 5 EASTING NORTHING POINT (m) (m) H11 H15 H12 170 598.12 9 039 337.45 H8 EXISTING HOUSE H17 H13 170 616.21 9 039 327.05 H14 170 630.82 9 039 301.23 H15 170 602.35 9 039 243.78 E E H16 170 574.20 9 039 217.78 H17 170 539.59 9 039 237.75 H16 H9 H10 TOTAL AREA TO BE PROCURED FOR : 1. SPOIL DISPOSAL AREA No. 5 = 3 710 m² 2. SPOIL DISPOSAL AREA No. 6 = 4 959 m² F F G G TO WAESANO LOGIN NAME: PRATIWI, RENEICA AYU 0 10 20 30 40 50m SCALE 1:500 (A1) 10 8 6 4 2 PRELIMINARY ISSUE CLIENT TITLE CLIENT CONSULTANT SUPPORTING AGENCIES PT SARANA MULTI INFRASTRUKTUR (PERSERO) H PROJECT SPOIL DISPOSAL AREA NO. 5 AND NO. 6 H DATE: 12/28/2017 11:45:08 AM WAESANO GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION PROJECT LAND PROCUREMENT BOUNDARY SETOUT DRAWN DRAWING CHECK REVIEWED APPROVED HWE SM A 15/12/17 HWE MT SAV PRELIMINARY ISSUE DESIGNED DESIGN REVIEW MT SAV SCALE DRAWING No REV REV DATE DRAWN REV'D APP'D REVISION AN MT DATE DATE 1:500 (A1) GEUDP-WS-DRG-CIV-137 A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A23 NOTES : DATUM IS WGS'84 ZONE 51S A A24 A LEGEND: PROCUREMENT LAND BOUNDARY NEW PAD AND ROAD OUTLINE A22 A21 EXISTING EASEMENT EXISTING ROAD CENTERLINE EXISTING PAVEMENT A25 B B A20 WELLPAD WS-A PEG COORDINATE TABLE PHASE-1 STANDARD HOLE/ PHASE-2 EASTING NORTHING POINT (m) (m) A1 169 633.79 9 034 140.26 A18 A19 A2 169 643.01 9 034 116.65 A3 169 667.92 9 034 096.78 C WATER/ C A17 MUD SUMP A4 169 694.86 9 034 045.33 LOCATION: K:\3 - PROJECT\JKTD17002 - Wae Sano Geothermal Exploration Site for PT SMI\4 - Technical Work Area\2 - Client Documents\9 - Jacobs Doc\Jacobs 22 December 2017\LAND DRAWINGS\Dwg\WS-A, LAYDOWN AREA - CIVIL CONTRACTORS CAMP AND SPOIL DISPOSAL AREA NO. 3.dwg A30 A16 A5 169 598.99 9 033 965.33 A6 169 501.17 9 033 927.66 A29 A27 A7 169 479.93 9 033 942.54 A26 A8 169 469.72 9 034 003.35 A5 A9 169 466.10 9 034 007.47 A6 D A10 169 331.40 9 034 007.53 D A11 169 338.51 9 034 029.36 A7 A12 169 389.08 9 034 014.99 A28 EXISTING STREAM A13 169 418.16 9 034 022.35 WELLPAD WS-A LAYDOWN A14 169 434.72 9 034 014.78 A4 SLIM HOLE/ PHASE-1 AREA EXISTING STREAM A15 169 435.78 9 034 010.58 PEG COORDINATE TABLE PHASE-2 E CIVIL CONTRACTOR CAMP AND E SPOIL DISPOSAL AREA NO. 3 EASTING NORTHING POINT (m) (m) NEW ACCESS ROAD A8 TO WELLPAD WS-A AND A16 169 508.36 9 033 890.59 EXISTING LAYDOWN AREA A17 169 515.90 9 033 890.59 STREAM A9 EXISTING HOUSE A18 169 515.90 9 033 876.59 A19 169 508.35 9 033 876.59 A3 A15 A20 169 502.23 9 033 838.43 F A21 169 515.94 9 033 804.89 F A14 A22 169 456.15 9 033 780.44 NEW ACCESS ROAD TO A13 DRILLING TOTAL AREA TO BE PROCURED FOR : A23 169 444.26 9 033 730.82 A2 A12 WATER TREATMENT A10 WATER/ MUD SUMP A24 169 375.17 9 033 728.79 AREA 1. WELLPAD WS-A, LAYDOWN AREA, CIVIL A25 169 307.22 9 033 751.30 CONTRACTOR CAMP AND SPOIL DISPOSAL A26 169 325.18 9 033 835.13 TO WAESANO AREA NO. 3 PHASE-1 = 20 953 m² VILLAGE A27 169 371.07 9 033 847.21 EXISTING ROAD 2. DRILLING WATER A28 169 371.07 9 033 893.36 TO BE UPGRADED A11 G A1 TREATMENT AREA = 2 057 m² G A29 169 441.60 9 033 871.51 SANONNGOANG 3. WELLPAD WS-A PHASE-2 = 23 835 m² A30 169 483.09 9 033 873.04 LOGIN NAME: PRATIWI, RENEICA AYU LAKE 0 15 30 45 60 75m SCALE 1:750 (A1) 1512 9 6 3 PRELIMINARY ISSUE CLIENT TITLE CLIENT CONSULTANT SUPPORTING AGENCIES PT SARANA MULTI INFRASTRUKTUR (PERSERO) H PROJECT WELLPAD WS-A, LAYDOWN AREA, H DATE: 12/28/2017 11:29:33 AM WAESANO GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION PROJECT DRAWN HSM DRAWING CHECK SM REVIEWED APPROVED LAND PROCUREMENT BOUNDARY SETOUT A 17/11/17 HWE MT SAV PRELIMINARY ISSUE DESIGNED DESIGN REVIEW MT SAV SCALE DRAWING No REV REV DATE DRAWN REV'D APP'D REVISION AN MT DATE DATE 1:750 (A1) GEUDP-WS-DRG-CIV-131 A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NOTES : DATUM IS WGS'84 ZONE 51S A A LEGEND: PROCUREMENT LAND BOUNDARY NEW PAD AND ROAD OUTLINE EXISTING EASEMENT EXISTING ROAD CENTERLINE B18 EXISTING PAVEMENT B B19 B PEG COORDINATE PHASE-1 B17 EASTING NORTHING EXISTING TRACK POINT (m) (m) B1 170 223.19 9 034 690.31 B2 170 223.18 9 034 682.18 WATER/ B3 170 231.55 9 034 669.77 MUD SUMP B4 170 247.11 9 034 662.54 C B9 B5 170 292.37 9 034 659.49 C LOCATION: K:\3 - PROJECT\JKTD17002 - Wae Sano Geothermal Exploration Site for PT SMI\4 - Technical Work Area\2 - Client Documents\9 - Jacobs Doc\Jacobs 22 December 2017\LAND DRAWINGS\Dwg\GEUDP-WS-DRG-CIV-132_B_WELLPAD WS-B - LAND PROCUREMENT BOUNDARY SETOUT.dwg WELLPAD WS-B B6 170 306.81 9 034 690.67 B16 FULL SIZE / PHASE 2 B7 170 352.43 9 034 689.54 B15 B8 170 360.07 9 034 670.14 B9 170 361.52 9 034 616.07 B10 170 297.83 9 034 611.02 B10 B11 170 297.83 9 034 629.27 B14 WELLPAD WS-B SLIM HOLE / PHASE 1 B12 170 235.81 9 034 644.59 B8 D B13 170 203.31 9 034 673.47 D B11 B7 EXISTING HOUSES NEW ACCESS ROAD PEG COORDINATE PHASE-2 B5 EASTING NORTHING POINT (m) (m) E B6 B14 170 507.81 9 034 807.94 E B12 B15 170 528.28 9 034 786.01 EXISTING STREAM B4 B16 170 513.65 9 034 772.36 B17 170 551.48 9 034 731.81 B3 B18 170 547.53 9 034 700.66 B19 170 408.20 9 034 592.93 EXISTING ROAD B2 TO BE UPGRADED B1 B13 TOTAL AREA TO BE PROCURED FOR F F 1. WELLPAD WS-B PHASE-1 = 6 850 m² 2. WELLPAD WS-B PHASE-2 = 20 455 m² ET T O PAD W S-A TL OU KE LA TO G G LOGIN NAME: PRATIWI, RENEICA AYU 0 15 30 45 60 75m SCALE 1:750 (A1) 1512 9 6 3 PRELIMINARY ISSUE CLIENT TITLE CLIENT CONSULTANT SUPPORTING AGENCIES PT SARANA MULTI INFRASTRUKTUR (PERSERO) H PROJECT WELLPAD WS-B H DATE: 12/28/2017 10:15:31 AM WAESANO GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION PROJECT LAND PROCUREMENT BOUNDARY SETOUT B 05/12/17 HWE MT SAV ACCESS ROAD ADJUSTMENT DRAWN DRAWING CHECK REVIEWED APPROVED HSM SM A 17/11/17 HSM MT SAV PRELIMINARY ISSUE DESIGNED DESIGN REVIEW MT SAV SCALE DRAWING No REV REV DATE DRAWN REV'D APP'D REVISION AN MT DATE DATE 1:750 (A1) GEUDP-WS-DRG-CIV-132 B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 PEG COORDINATE TABLE PHASE-2 D21 NOTES : EASTING NORTHING DATUM IS WGS'84 ZONE 51S POINT (m) (m) A N D32 170 434.81 9 036 470.13 LEGEND: A D33 170 481.47 9 036 474.08 D20 PROCUREMENT LAND BOUNDARY D22 D34 170 583.10 9 036 432.02 NEW PAD AND ROAD OUTLINE D35 170 541.01 9 036 304.15 EXISTING EASEMENT EXISTING ROAD CENTERLINE TOTAL AREA TO BE PROCURED FOR : EXISTING PAVEMENT 1. WELLPAD WS-D PHASE-1 = 10 346 m² D19 PROPOSED PAVEMENT WIDENING B 2. SPOIL DISPOSAL AREA No.1 = 10 509 m² B LAND TO BE PROCURED 3. WELLPAD WS-D PHASE-2 = 13 528 m² SPOIL DISPOSAL AREA No.1 CULVERT D18 D23 PEG COORDINATE TABLE PHASE-1 EASTING NORTHING EXISTING POINT (m) (m) STREAM C C D1 170 428.23 9 036 508.89 LOCATION: K:\3 - PROJECT\JKTD17002 - Wae Sano Geothermal Exploration Site for PT SMI\4 - Technical Work Area\2 - Client Documents\9 - Jacobs Doc\Jacobs 22 December 2017\LAND DRAWINGS\Dwg\GEUDP-WS-DRG-CIV-133_B_WELLPAD WS-D - LAND PROCUREMENT BOUNDARY SETOUT.dwg D17 EXISTING D2 170 425.40 9 036 501.24 STREAM D3 170 406.78 9 036 495.96 D4 170 401.80 9 036 479.61 D5 170 408.49 9 036 458.73 EXISTING ROAD TO BE UPGRADED D6 170 510.26 9 036 411.14 EXISTING HOUSE D34 D7 170 462.62 9 036 317.73 D8 170 408.04 9 036 357.29 D D D9 170 416.58 9 036 377.95 D10 170 404.35 9 036 386.63 D33 D11 170 415.99 9 036 414.74 D12 170 393.72 9 036 438.94 D1 D13 170 384.76 9 036 466.95 D16 PUMP D2 WATER/ MUD SUMP D14 170 387.90 9 036 492.16 PAD STANDARD HOLE ROAD D15 170 395.75 9 036 505.67 TO LAKE D3 D32 E D27 D15 D6 D16 170 392.05 9 036 531.04 E D26 D4 D24 D25 D17 170 568.97 9 036 497.57 D14 D5 D18 170 567.57 9 036 548.81 D28 D19 170 579.46 9 036 569.22 D31 D20 170 608.91 9 036 584.99 D30 D13 D21 170 695.85 9 036 562.92 NEW BYPASS WELLPAD WS-D WELLPAD WS-D STANDARD HOLE / PHASE 2 D22 170 696.00 9 036 518.08 D29 F SLIM HOLE / PHASE 1 F D23 170 648.28 9 036 467.77 D12 D11 EXISTING D24 170 233.01 9 036 599.39 STREAM D25 170 236.77 9 036 592.90 D35 D26 170 267.14 9 036 588.76 D27 170 311.08 9 036 569.45 EXISTING D10 D9 D28 170 275.58 9 036 562.43 STREAM D29 170 230.02 9 036 568.67 G G D30 170 222.27 9 036 590.56 LOGIN NAME: PRATIWI, RENEICA AYU D7 D8 D31 170 217.43 9 036 598.93 0 15 30 45 60 75m SCALE 1:750 (A1) 1512 9 6 3 PRELIMINARY ISSUE CLIENT TITLE CLIENT CONSULTANT SUPPORTING AGENCIES PT SARANA MULTI INFRASTRUKTUR (PERSERO) H PROJECT WELLPAD WS-D, SPOIL DISPOSAL AREA NO. 1 AND H DATE: 12/28/2017 10:19:27 AM WAESANO GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION PROJECT PUBLIC ROAD TO WELL PAD WS-D STA. 1+000 B 15/12/17 HWE MT SAV PRELIMINARY ISSUE DRAWN HSM DRAWING CHECK SM REVIEWED APPROVED LAND PROCUREMENT BOUNDARY SETOUT A 17/11/17 HWE MT SAV PRELIMINARY ISSUE DESIGNED DESIGN REVIEW MT SAV SCALE DRAWING No REV REV DATE DRAWN REV'D APP'D REVISION AN MT DATE DATE 1:750 (A1) GEUDP-WS-DRG-CIV-133 B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NOTES : E27 DATUM IS WGS'84 ZONE 51S E26 A N LEGEND: A PROCUREMENT LAND BOUNDARY NEW PAD AND ROAD OUTLINE WATER/ EXISTING EASEMENT E28 MUD SUMP EXISTING ROAD CENTERLINE PUMP EXISTING PAVEMENT PAD B PEG COORDINATE TABLE PHASE-1 B EASTING NORTHING WELLPAD WS-E POINT (m) (m) E25 E6 STANDARD HOLE/ PHASE-2 E1 169 670.59 9 036 675.86 E2 169 680.68 9 036 684.56 E3 169 676.87 9 036 697.84 E8 E4 169 542.12 9 036 758.51 E9 E5 169 492.73 9 036 815.19 C E6 169 547.39 9 036 862.81 C LOCATION: K:\3 - PROJECT\JKTD17002 - Wae Sano Geothermal Exploration Site for PT SMI\4 - Technical Work Area\2 - Client Documents\9 - Jacobs Doc\Jacobs 22 December 2017\LAND DRAWINGS\Dwg\GEUDP-WS-DRG-CIV-134_B_WELLPAD WS-E - LAND PROCUREMENT BOUNDARY SETOUT.dwg E7 169 597.32 9 036 805.50 WELLPAD WS-E E7 E8 169 628.97 9 036 833.07 E5 E10 SLIM HOLE/ PHASE-1 E9 169 671.21 9 036 832.60 WATER/ E10 169 697.65 9 036 807.88 MUD SUMP E11 169 725.65 9 036 716.11 E12 169 704.78 9 036 685.50 SPOIL DISPOSAL AREA No.2 E13 169 715.33 9 036 650.51 D D E14 169 611.81 9 036 664.08 E15 169 607.67 9 036 679.31 E4 E16 169 619.95 9 036 691.70 E17 169 628.08 9 036 692.78 E18 169 650.62 9 036 679.75 E E19 169 929.57 9 036 642.34 E TO LABUAN BAJO E20 169 942.26 9 036 633.89 E11 E21 169 947.09 9 036 614.91 E22 169 958.64 9 036 608.14 E17 E23 169 981.70 9 036 614.28 E16 E3 E24 169 997.89 9 036 642.33 E18 E2 E12 E15 E1 EXISTING ROAD PEG COORDINATE TABLE PHASE-2 F TO BE UPGRADED F EASTING NORTHING POINT (m) (m) E14 E25 169 447.17 9 036 867.49 E13 E26 169 509.36 9 036 929.93 TO WELLPAD E27 169 541.30 9 036 945.94 E19 E24 WS-D E28 169 603.08 9 036 904.78 E20 TOTAL AREA TO BE PROCURED FOR : G SANONGGOANG G LAKE 1. WELLPAD WS-E PHASE-1 = 21 589 m² LOGIN NAME: PRATIWI, RENEICA AYU E21 E23 TO THE LAKE AND SPOIL DISPOSAL No.2 E22 2. WELLPAD WS-E PHASE-2 = 13 743 m² 0 15 30 45 60 75m SCALE 1:750 (A1) 1512 9 6 3 PRELIMINARY ISSUE CLIENT TITLE CLIENT CONSULTANT SUPPORTING AGENCIES PT SARANA MULTI INFRASTRUKTUR (PERSERO) H PROJECT WELLPAD WS-E, SPOIL DISPOSAL AREA NO. 2, H DATE: 12/28/2017 10:34:46 AM WAESANO GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION PROJECT B 15/12/17 HWE MT SAV PRELIMINARY ISSUE DRAWN HWE DRAWING CHECK SM REVIEWED APPROVED LAND PROCUREMENT BOUNDARY SETOUT A 17/11/17 HWE MT SAV PRELIMINARY ISSUE DESIGNED DESIGN REVIEW MT SAV SCALE DRAWING No REV REV DATE DRAWN REV'D APP'D REVISION AN MT DATE DATE 1:750 (A1) GEUDP-WS-DRG-CIV-134 B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A1 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) Appendix F Waesano Project Schedule Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM F ID WBS Task Name Duration Start Finish 2017 2018 2019 2020 MarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec Jan FebMarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec Jan FebMarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec Jan FebMarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec 1 1 Waesano Project 881 days 4/1/17 8/15/20 2 3 1.1 Project Initiation & Control 881 days 4/1/17 8/15/20 4 1.1.1 Notional Start of Project 0.05 ewks 4/1/17 4/1/17 5 1.1.2 EMT Contract Effective 1 day 5/1/17 5/1/17 6 1.1.3 World Bank Finance Available 1 day 8/4/17 8/4/17 7 1.1.4 SMI PMU Establishment 6 ewks 10/1/17 11/12/17 8 1.1.5 Joint Committee Established, Project Assigned 0 days 11/15/17 11/15/17 11/15 9 1.1.6 Pre-Feasibility Study 223 days 4/15/17 2/22/18 10 1.1.6.1 Update PLN Offtake Capability 2.05 ewks 5/13/17 5/27/17 11 1.1.6.2 Outline Exploration Drilling Plan 2.05 ewks 4/15/17 4/29/17 12 1.1.6.3 Develop Drilling Schedule & Budget 2.05 ewks 4/29/17 5/13/17 13 1.1.6.4 Summarise Resource Capacity Report 2.05 ewks 6/5/17 6/19/17 14 1.1.6.5 Describe Possible Developed Project 2.05 ewks 6/19/17 7/3/17 15 1.1.6.6 Preliminary Tariff Assessment 1.05 ewks 7/3/17 7/10/17 16 1.1.6.7 Assemble Pre-Feasibility Study 1.01 emons 7/10/17 8/9/17 17 1.1.6.8 Update Pre-FS for New Drilling Plan 2 ewks 10/23/17 11/6/17 18 1.1.6.9 Joint Committee Review & Decision 78 days 11/6/17 2/22/18 19 1.1.6.9.1 Pre-FS Review by PMU & SMI 1 ewk 11/6/17 11/13/17 20 1.1.6.9.2 Presentation to JC 1 ewk 2/15/18 2/22/18 21 1.1.6.9.3 Go/No Go Decision for Exploration Drilling 0 days 2/22/18 2/22/18 2/22 22 1.1.7 Establish SMI Site Presence 1 emon 2/22/18 3/24/18 23 1.1.8 Prepare Project Information Memo 48 days 5/10/20 7/16/20 24 1.1.8.1 Update Safeguards Screening 1 emon 5/10/20 6/9/20 25 1.1.8.2 Summarise Resource Information 1 emon 6/9/20 7/9/20 26 1.1.8.3 Outline Possible Project & Tariff Requirement 3 ewks 6/9/20 6/30/20 27 1.1.8.4 Assemble PIM 1 ewk 7/9/20 7/16/20 28 1.1.9 Joint Committee Review 195 days 11/16/19 8/15/20 29 1.1.9.1 Decision to proceed with Standard Hole Drilling 1 ewk 11/16/19 11/23/19 30 1.1.9.2 Project Info Memo review by PMU and PT. SMI 1 ewk 7/16/20 7/23/20 31 1.1.9.3 Presentation to JC 1 ewk 7/23/20 7/30/20 32 1.1.9.4 Decision to Tender or Allocate Concession 0 days 7/30/20 7/30/20 7/30 33 1.1.9.5 Assemble Full Data Package 1 emon 7/16/20 8/15/20 34 1.1.9.6 Deliver Data Package to MoF 0 days 8/15/20 8/15/20 8/15 35 1.1.10 SMI Cease Waesano Operations 0 days 8/15/20 8/15/20 8/15 36 37 1.2 Procurement 389 days 4/1/17 9/27/18 38 1.2.1 Preparation of Standard Tendering Items 30 days 1/10/18 2/21/18 39 1.2.1.1 Drafting of Standard Tender & Contract Terms 6 ewks 1/10/18 2/21/18 40 1.2.1.2 Procurement Workshop 1 day 1/10/18 1/10/18 41 1.2.2 Pre-Drilling Phase 263 days 4/1/17 4/4/18 42 1.2.2.1 Geology Survey (Individual Consultant) 221 days 4/1/17 2/5/18 43 1.2.2.1.1 Prepare TOR 15.38 edays 4/1/17 4/16/17 44 1.2.2.1.2 Request CV 5.38 edays 4/16/17 4/21/17 45 1.2.2.1.3 Submission of EOI & CV 1 day 4/21/17 4/21/17 46 1.2.2.1.4 Evaluation of CVs 5.38 edays 4/21/17 4/26/17 47 1.2.2.1.5 Negotiations 5.38 edays 7/28/17 8/2/17 2/15/18 20180203 - GEUDP-WS-SCH-PRM-001 Rev 3 Waesano Schedule Page 1 of 7 ID WBS Task Name Duration Start Finish 2017 2018 2019 2020 MarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec Jan FebMarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec Jan FebMarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec Jan FebMarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec 48 1.2.2.1.6 Contract Signing 0 days 2/5/18 2/5/18 2/5 49 1.2.2.2 Lake Survey (Shopping, NCS) 154 days 7/7/17 2/8/18 50 1.2.2.2.1 Preparation of Bidding Documents 28.38 edays 7/7/17 8/4/17 51 1.2.2.2.2 Advertise Bidding 14.38 edays 10/23/17 11/6/17 52 1.2.2.2.3 Bid Submission 1 day 11/6/17 11/7/17 53 1.2.2.2.4 Evaluation of Bids 4 edays 11/7/17 11/11/17 54 1.2.2.2.5 Letter of Acceptance 0 days 11/11/17 11/11/17 11/11 55 1.2.2.2.6 Contract Documentation 2 ewks 11/11/17 11/25/17 56 1.2.2.2.7 Contract Signing 3 edays 2/5/18 2/8/18 57 1.2.2.3 Geotechnical Survey (Shopping, Small Works) 82 days 11/26/17 3/21/18 58 1.2.2.3.1 Preparation of Bidding Documents 6.58 ewks 11/26/17 1/11/18 59 1.2.2.3.2 Invite Bids 21 edays 2/9/18 3/2/18 60 1.2.2.3.3 Bid Submission 0 days 3/2/18 3/2/18 3/2 61 1.2.2.3.4 Evaluation of Bids 14 edays 3/2/18 3/16/18 62 1.2.2.3.5 Letter of Acceptance 0 days 3/16/18 3/16/18 3/16 63 1.2.2.3.6 Contract Documentation 5 edays 3/16/18 3/21/18 64 1.2.2.3.7 Contract Signing 0 days 3/21/18 3/21/18 3/21 65 1.2.2.4 LARAP Consultant (Direct Appoint, NOL) 10 days 3/21/18 4/4/18 66 1.2.2.4.1 Negotiations 2 ewks 3/21/18 4/4/18 67 1.2.2.4.2 Contract Signing 0 days 4/4/18 4/4/18 4/4 68 1.2.3 Drilling Phase 208 days 12/10/17 9/27/18 69 1.2.3.1 Geochemistry Laboratory Services (Shopping, NCS) 85.75 days 12/10/17 4/9/18 70 1.2.3.1.1 Preparation of Bidding Documents 15 days 12/10/17 2/22/18 71 1.2.3.1.2 Advertise Bidding 21 edays 2/22/18 3/15/18 72 1.2.3.1.3 Bid Submission 0 days 3/15/18 3/15/18 3/15 73 1.2.3.1.4 Evaluation of Bids 20 edays 3/15/18 4/4/18 74 1.2.3.1.5 Letter of Acceptance 0 days 4/4/18 4/4/18 4/4 75 1.2.3.1.6 Contract Documentation 5 edays 4/4/18 4/9/18 76 1.2.3.1.7 Contract Signing 0 days 4/9/18 4/9/18 4/9 77 1.2.3.2 Geology Laboratory Services (NCB, NCS) 85.75 days 12/10/17 4/9/18 78 1.2.3.2.1 Preparation of Bidding Documents 15 days 12/10/17 2/22/18 79 1.2.3.2.2 Advertise Bidding 21 edays 2/22/18 3/15/18 80 1.2.3.2.3 Bid Submission 0 days 3/15/18 3/15/18 3/15 81 1.2.3.2.4 Evaluation of Bids 20 edays 3/15/18 4/4/18 82 1.2.3.2.5 Letter of Acceptance 0 days 4/4/18 4/4/18 4/4 83 1.2.3.2.6 Contract Documentation 5 edays 4/4/18 4/9/18 84 1.2.3.2.7 Contract Signing 0 days 4/9/18 4/9/18 4/9 85 1.2.3.3 Civil Works (NCB, Works, NOL) 117 days 2/22/18 8/4/18 86 1.2.3.3.1 Finalise Bidding Documents 1 emon 2/22/18 3/24/18 87 1.2.3.3.2 Submit to WB 0 days 3/24/18 3/24/18 3/24 88 1.2.3.3.3 WB No Objection 10 edays 3/24/18 4/3/18 89 1.2.3.3.4 Advertise Bidding 6 ewks 4/5/18 5/17/18 90 1.2.3.3.5 Bid Submission 0 days 5/17/18 5/17/18 5/17 91 1.2.3.3.6 Evaluation of Bids 6 ewks 5/17/18 6/28/18 92 1.2.3.3.7 Submit to WB 0 days 6/28/18 6/28/18 6/28 93 1.2.3.3.8 WB No Objection 10 edays 6/28/18 7/8/18 94 1.2.3.3.9 Letter of Acceptance 0 days 7/11/18 7/11/18 7/11 2/15/18 20180203 - GEUDP-WS-SCH-PRM-001 Rev 3 Waesano Schedule Page 2 of 7 ID WBS Task Name Duration Start Finish 2017 2018 2019 2020 MarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec Jan FebMarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec Jan FebMarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec Jan FebMarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec 95 1.2.3.3.10 Contract Documentation 10 edays 7/25/18 8/4/18 96 1.2.3.3.11 Contract Signing 0 days 8/4/18 8/4/18 8/4 97 1.2.3.4 Slimhole Drilling Rig, Services & Materials (NCB, Works, NOL) 91 days 3/24/18 7/31/18 98 1.2.3.4.1 Preparation of Bidding Documents 15 edays 3/24/18 4/8/18 99 1.2.3.4.2 Submit to WB 0 days 4/8/18 4/8/18 4/8 100 1.2.3.4.3 WB No Objection 10 edays 4/8/18 4/18/18 101 1.2.3.4.4 Advertise Bidding 42 edays 4/20/18 6/1/18 102 1.2.3.4.5 Bid Submission 0 days 6/1/18 6/1/18 6/1 103 1.2.3.4.6 Evaluation of Bids 6 ewks 6/1/18 7/13/18 104 1.2.3.4.7 Submit to WB 0 days 7/13/18 7/13/18 7/13 105 1.2.3.4.8 WB No Objection 10 edays 7/13/18 7/23/18 106 1.2.3.4.9 Letter of Acceptance 0 days 7/26/18 7/26/18 7/26 107 1.2.3.4.10 Contract Documentation 5 edays 7/26/18 7/31/18 108 1.2.3.4.11 Contract Signing 0 days 7/31/18 7/31/18 7/31 109 1.2.3.5 Inspection Services (NCB, Small Works) 40 days 4/8/18 6/3/18 110 1.2.3.5.1 Preparation of Bidding Documents 15 edays 4/8/18 4/23/18 111 1.2.3.5.2 Advertise Bidding 21 edays 4/23/18 5/14/18 112 1.2.3.5.3 Bid Submission 0 days 5/14/18 5/14/18 5/14 113 1.2.3.5.4 Evaluation of Bids 15 edays 5/14/18 5/29/18 114 1.2.3.5.5 Letter of Acceptance 0 days 5/29/18 5/29/18 5/29 115 1.2.3.5.6 Contract Documentation 5 edays 5/29/18 6/3/18 116 1.2.3.5.7 Contract Signing 0 days 6/3/18 6/3/18 6/3 117 1.2.3.6 Downhole Logging Services (NCB, Small Works) 95 days 1/22/18 6/1/18 118 1.2.3.6.1 Preparation of Bidding Documents 89.5 edays 1/22/18 4/21/18 119 1.2.3.6.2 Advertise Bidding 21 edays 4/21/18 5/12/18 120 1.2.3.6.3 Bid Submission 0 days 5/12/18 5/12/18 5/12 121 1.2.3.6.4 Evaluation of Bids 15 edays 5/12/18 5/27/18 122 1.2.3.6.5 Letter of Acceptance 0 days 5/27/18 5/27/18 5/27 123 1.2.3.6.6 Contract Documentation 5 edays 5/27/18 6/1/18 124 1.2.3.6.7 Contract Signing 0 days 6/1/18 6/1/18 6/1 125 1.2.3.7 Long Lead Items (Casings) (NCB, Goods) 45 days 4/23/18 6/23/18 126 1.2.3.7.1 Preparation of Bidding Documents 15 edays 4/23/18 5/8/18 127 1.2.3.7.2 Advertise Bidding 21 edays 5/8/18 5/29/18 128 1.2.3.7.3 Bid Submission 0 days 5/29/18 5/29/18 5/29 129 1.2.3.7.4 Evaluation of Bids 20 edays 5/29/18 6/18/18 130 1.2.3.7.5 Letter of Acceptance 0 days 6/18/18 6/18/18 6/18 131 1.2.3.7.6 Contract Documentation 5 edays 6/18/18 6/23/18 132 1.2.3.7.7 Contract Signing 0 days 6/23/18 6/23/18 6/23 133 1.2.3.8 Long Lead Items (Well Heads) (NCB, Goods) 45 days 4/23/18 6/23/18 134 1.2.3.8.1 Preparation of Bidding Documents 15 edays 4/23/18 5/8/18 135 1.2.3.8.2 Advertise Bidding 21 edays 5/8/18 5/29/18 136 1.2.3.8.3 Bid Submission 0 days 5/29/18 5/29/18 5/29 137 1.2.3.8.4 Evaluation of Bids 20 edays 5/29/18 6/18/18 138 1.2.3.8.5 Letter of Acceptance 0 days 6/18/18 6/18/18 6/18 139 1.2.3.8.6 Contract Documentation 5 edays 6/18/18 6/23/18 140 1.2.3.8.7 Contract Signing 0 days 6/23/18 6/23/18 6/23 2/15/18 20180203 - GEUDP-WS-SCH-PRM-001 Rev 3 Waesano Schedule Page 3 of 7 ID WBS Task Name Duration Start Finish 2017 2018 2019 2020 MarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec Jan FebMarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec Jan FebMarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec Jan FebMarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec 141 1.2.3.9 Standard Hole Drilling Rig (NCB, Works, NOL) 102 days 5/8/18 9/27/18 142 1.2.3.9.1 Preparation of Bidding Documents 1 emon 5/8/18 6/7/18 143 1.2.3.9.2 Submit to WB 0 days 6/7/18 6/7/18 6/7 144 1.2.3.9.3 WB No Objection 10 edays 6/7/18 6/17/18 145 1.2.3.9.4 Advertise Bidding 42 edays 6/17/18 7/29/18 146 1.2.3.9.5 Bid Submission 0 days 7/29/18 7/29/18 7/29 147 1.2.3.9.6 Evaluation of Bids 6 ewks 7/29/18 9/9/18 148 1.2.3.9.7 Submit to WB 0 days 9/9/18 9/9/18 9/9 149 1.2.3.9.8 WB No Objection 10 edays 9/9/18 9/19/18 150 1.2.3.9.9 Letter of Acceptance 0 days 9/22/18 9/22/18 9/22 151 1.2.3.9.10 Contract Documentation 5 edays 9/22/18 9/27/18 152 1.2.3.9.11 Contract Signing 0 days 9/27/18 9/27/18 9/27 153 1.2.3.10 Standard Hole Integrated Services (NCB, Works, NOL) 102 days 5/8/18 9/27/18 154 1.2.3.10.1 Preparation of Bidding Documents 1 emon 5/8/18 6/7/18 155 1.2.3.10.2 Submit to WB 0 days 6/7/18 6/7/18 6/7 156 1.2.3.10.3 WB No Objection 10 edays 6/7/18 6/17/18 157 1.2.3.10.4 Advertise Bidding 42 edays 6/17/18 7/29/18 158 1.2.3.10.5 Bid Submission 0 days 7/29/18 7/29/18 7/29 159 1.2.3.10.6 Evaluation of Bids 6 ewks 7/29/18 9/9/18 160 1.2.3.10.7 Submit to WB 0 days 9/9/18 9/9/18 9/9 161 1.2.3.10.8 WB No Objection 10 edays 9/9/18 9/19/18 162 1.2.3.10.9 Letter of Acceptance 0 days 9/22/18 9/22/18 9/22 163 1.2.3.10.10 Contract Documentation 5 edays 9/22/18 9/27/18 164 1.2.3.10.11 Contract Signing 0 days 9/27/18 9/27/18 9/27 165 166 1.3 Environmental, Land & Permitting 244 days 11/20/17 10/26/18 167 1.3.1 ESIA, UKL/UPL 88 days 11/20/17 3/21/18 168 1.3.1.1 Review ESIA and EMP - Finalise Report 3.05 emons 11/20/17 2/19/18 169 1.3.1.2 World Bank Clearances & Disclosure 1 emon 2/19/18 3/21/18 170 1.3.2 Land Acquisition 134 days 2/7/18 8/13/18 171 1.3.2.1 Discussion with MEMR on proposed leasing arrangement 1 ewk 2/7/18 2/14/18 172 1.3.2.2 Preliminary Discussions with Local Authorities 2 ewks 2/14/18 2/28/18 173 1.3.2.3 Draft Standard Lease Documentation 3 ewks 2/14/18 3/7/18 174 1.3.2.4 Land Acquisition Drawings Available 0 days 2/28/18 2/28/18 2/28 175 1.3.2.5 Cadastral Data Collection 1 ewk 2/28/18 3/7/18 176 1.3.2.6 Community Discussion 1 ewk 3/7/18 3/14/18 177 1.3.2.7 Identification of Land and Parties 30 days 3/14/18 4/24/18 178 1.3.2.8 Compensation Discussions 30 days 4/25/18 6/5/18 179 1.3.2.9 Deliver Negotiation Results to MEMR 3 days 6/6/18 6/8/18 180 1.3.2.10 Payment of Lease Deposits 2.05 ewks 6/8/18 6/23/18 181 1.3.2.11 Larap Support 125 days 2/20/18 8/13/18 182 1.3.2.11.1 Larap Consultant Activity 125 days 2/20/18 8/13/18 183 1.3.3 Permiting 172 days 2/28/18 10/26/18 184 1.3.3.1 Principal Permit 64 days 3/21/18 6/19/18 185 1.3.3.1.1 Process with Local Authority 3 emons 3/21/18 6/19/18 186 1.3.3.2 Location Permit 64 days 3/21/18 6/19/18 187 1.3.3.2.1 Process with Local Authority 3 emons 3/21/18 6/19/18 2/15/18 20180203 - GEUDP-WS-SCH-PRM-001 Rev 3 Waesano Schedule Page 4 of 7 ID WBS Task Name Duration Start Finish 2017 2018 2019 2020 MarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec Jan FebMarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec Jan FebMarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec Jan FebMarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec 188 1.3.3.3 SPPL 42 days 3/21/18 5/20/18 189 1.3.3.3.1 Prepare Application to Regency Level 1 emon 3/21/18 4/20/18 190 1.3.3.3.2 Processing & Approval 1 emon 4/20/18 5/20/18 191 1.3.3.3.3 Permit Issued 0 days 5/20/18 5/20/18 5/20 192 1.3.3.4 UKL/UPL 86 days 2/28/18 6/28/18 193 1.3.3.4.1 GOI UKL/UPL Approval Process 4 emons 2/28/18 6/28/18 194 1.3.3.4.2 UKL/UPL Issued 0 days 6/28/18 6/28/18 6/28 195 1.3.3.5 Environmental Permit (Izin Lingkungan) 86 days 6/28/18 10/26/18 196 1.3.3.5.1 Permit Processing 4 emons 6/28/18 10/26/18 197 1.3.3.5.2 Environmental Permit Issued 0 days 10/26/18 10/26/18 10/26 198 1.3.3.6 Borrow/Use Permit (if required) 107 days 3/21/18 8/18/18 199 1.3.3.6.1 Process with Ministry of Environment & Forestry 5 emons 3/21/18 8/18/18 200 201 1.4 Geoscience & Reservoir 831 days 4/1/17 6/9/20 202 1.4.1 Geology Survey 81 days 3/5/18 6/26/18 203 1.4.1.1 Site Visit for Survey 2.14 ewks 3/5/18 3/20/18 204 1.4.1.2 Preliminary Report 3.14 ewks 3/20/18 4/11/18 205 1.4.1.3 Laboratory Analysis for Ar/Ar Dating 2.03 emons 4/11/18 6/11/18 206 1.4.1.4 Final Report 2.14 ewks 6/11/18 6/26/18 207 1.4.2 Lake Survey 47 days 3/8/18 5/13/18 208 1.4.2.1 Preliminary Survey 1 ewk 3/8/18 3/15/18 209 1.4.2.2 Initial Report 0 ewks 3/15/18 3/15/18 3/15 210 1.4.2.3 Confirm Detailed Survey 3 edays 3/15/18 3/18/18 211 1.4.2.4 Detailed Survey & Report 8 ewks 3/18/18 5/13/18 212 1.4.3 Prepare Geological Prognosis 2.05 ewks 4/1/17 4/16/17 213 1.4.4 Update Geological Prognosis for Slimholes 1 ewk 10/23/17 10/30/17 214 1.4.5 Inferred Resource Capacity Report 26 days 5/1/17 6/5/17 215 1.4.5.1 Draft Report 4.05 ewks 5/1/17 5/29/17 216 1.4.5.2 Certify Report 1.05 ewks 5/29/17 6/5/17 217 1.4.6 Well Test Result Analysis 15 days 10/26/19 11/16/19 218 1.4.6.1 Analyse Slimhole Well Results 2 ewks 10/26/19 11/9/19 219 1.4.6.2 Recommend Standard Hole Drilling 1 ewk 11/9/19 11/16/19 220 1.4.7 Updated Reservoir Capacity Report 161 days 10/26/19 6/9/20 221 1.4.7.1 Draft Report 1 emon 10/26/19 11/25/19 222 1.4.7.2 Finalise Report & Certify 2 ewks 5/26/20 6/9/20 223 224 1.5 Infrastructure 876 days 4/1/17 8/8/20 225 1.5.1 Engineering 343 days 4/1/17 7/25/18 226 1.5.1.1 Inspect Access Road Condition 3.38 edays 4/1/17 4/5/17 227 1.5.1.2 Identify Possible Well Pad Locations 3.38 edays 4/1/17 4/4/17 228 1.5.1.3 Identify Possible Drilling Water Sources 3.38 edays 4/4/17 4/7/17 229 1.5.1.4 Identify Other Facility Locations 2.38 edays 4/7/17 4/10/17 230 1.5.1.5 Topographical Survey 4.05 ewks 5/6/17 6/4/17 231 1.5.1.6 Land Acquisition Drawings 1 emon 10/17/17 11/16/17 232 1.5.1.7 Initial Infrastructure Design & Specification 10 ewks 10/17/17 12/26/17 233 1.5.1.8 Geotechnical Survey 12 ewks 3/21/18 6/13/18 234 1.5.1.9 Complete Infrastructure Design & Specification 6 ewks 6/13/18 7/25/18 2/15/18 20180203 - GEUDP-WS-SCH-PRM-001 Rev 3 Waesano Schedule Page 5 of 7 ID WBS Task Name Duration Start Finish 2017 2018 2019 2020 MarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec Jan FebMarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec Jan FebMarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec Jan FebMarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec 235 1.5.1.10 Drilling Water System Design & Specification 2 emons 10/17/17 12/16/17 236 1.5.1.11 Complete Well Test Equipment Design & Spec 1 emon 10/17/17 11/16/17 237 1.5.2 Slimhole Infrastructure Construction 86 days 10/26/18 2/23/19 238 1.5.2.1 Mobilise Contractor 1 emon 10/26/18 11/25/18 239 1.5.2.2 Upgrade Main Access Road 3 emons 11/25/18 2/23/19 240 1.5.2.3 Construct Well Pads and Roads 3 emons 11/25/18 2/23/19 241 1.5.2.4 Fabricate Drilling Water Dosing Equipment 1 emon 10/26/18 11/25/18 242 1.5.2.5 Install Drilling Water Supply System 2 ewks 12/25/18 1/8/19 243 1.5.2.6 Construct Laydown Area & Other Facilities 6 ewks 11/25/18 1/6/19 244 1.5.2.7 Fabricate Well Test Equipment & Piping 3 emons 10/26/18 1/24/19 245 1.5.3 Standard Hole Infrastructure Construction 64 days 11/23/19 2/21/20 246 1.5.3.1 Construct Standard Hole Well Pad and Road 2 emons 11/23/19 1/22/20 247 1.5.3.2 Fabricate Drilling Water Dosing Equipment 1 emon 11/23/19 12/23/19 248 1.5.3.3 Install Drilling Water Supply System 2 ewks 12/23/19 1/6/20 249 1.5.3.4 Fabricate Well Test Equipment & Piping 3 emons 11/23/19 2/21/20 250 1.5.3.5 Expand Laydown Area & Other Facilities 1.5 emons 12/7/19 1/21/20 251 1.5.4 Common Construction Activities 296 days 6/21/19 8/8/20 252 1.5.4.1 Well Test Support 49 ewks 6/21/19 5/29/20 253 1.5.4.2 Site Clean-Up & Secure 2 emons 5/26/20 7/25/20 254 1.5.4.3 Demobilise Contractor 2 ewks 7/25/20 8/8/20 255 256 1.6 Drilling 789 days 4/1/17 4/10/20 257 1.6.1 Drilling Engineering - Slimhole 65 days 10/23/17 1/22/18 258 1.6.1.1 Prepare Well Targets & Drilling Decision Strategy 2 ewks 10/23/17 11/6/17 259 1.6.1.2 Well Design 2 ewks 11/6/17 11/20/17 260 1.6.1.3 Prepare Drilling Program 2 ewks 11/20/17 12/4/17 261 1.6.1.4 Prepare Slimhole Rig and Services Specifications 6 ewks 11/20/17 1/1/18 262 1.6.1.5 Prepare Inspection Services Specifications (both sizes) 3 ewks 1/1/18 1/22/18 263 1.6.2 Drilling Engineering - Standard Hole 240 days 4/1/17 3/5/18 264 1.6.2.1 Prepare Well Targets & Drilling Decision Strategy 2 ewks 4/1/17 4/15/17 265 1.6.2.2 Well Design 2 ewks 4/16/17 4/30/17 266 1.6.2.3 Prepare Drilling Program 2 ewks 4/30/17 5/14/17 267 1.6.2.4 Prepare Long Lead Item Specifications etc 1 ewk 4/30/17 5/7/17 268 1.6.2.5 Prepare Drilling Rig Specification etc 2 ewks 1/22/18 2/5/18 269 1.6.2.6 Prepare Drilling Services Specifications etc 4 ewks 2/5/18 3/5/18 270 1.6.3 Slimhole Drilling Operations 236 days 10/26/18 9/21/19 271 1.6.3.1 Rig Inspection & Mobilisation 2 emons 1/24/19 3/25/19 272 1.6.3.2 Delivery of Long Lead Items 4 emons 10/26/18 2/23/19 273 1.6.3.3 Drill Well #1 85 edays 3/25/19 6/18/19 274 1.6.3.4 Rig Move 3 edays 6/18/19 6/21/19 275 1.6.3.5 Prepare Drilling Program for Well #2 1 ewk 6/4/19 6/11/19 276 1.6.3.6 Drill Well #2 85 edays 6/21/19 9/14/19 277 1.6.3.7 Demobilise Rig 1 ewk 9/14/19 9/21/19 278 1.6.4 Standard Hole Drilling Operations 283 days 3/11/19 4/10/20 279 1.6.4.1 Rig Inspection & Mobilisation 2 emons 11/9/19 1/8/20 280 1.6.4.2 Delivery of Long Lead Items 9 emons 3/11/19 12/6/19 281 1.6.4.3 Drill Well #3 65 edays 1/22/20 3/27/20 2/15/18 20180203 - GEUDP-WS-SCH-PRM-001 Rev 3 Waesano Schedule Page 6 of 7 ID WBS Task Name Duration Start Finish 2017 2018 2019 2020 MarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec Jan FebMarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec Jan FebMarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec Jan FebMarAprMayJun Jul AugSep OctNovDec 282 1.6.4.4 Demobilise Rig 2 ewks 3/27/20 4/10/20 283 284 1.7 Well Testing 245 days 6/18/19 5/26/20 285 1.7.1 Erect Well Test Equipment Well #1 2 ewks 6/21/19 7/5/19 286 1.7.2 Reheat Well #1 2 ewks 6/18/19 7/2/19 287 1.7.3 Test Well #1 (to #2) 1 ewk 9/14/19 9/21/19 288 1.7.4 Move Test Equipment 1 ewk 9/21/19 9/28/19 289 1.7.5 Reheat Well #2 4 ewks 9/21/19 10/19/19 290 1.7.6 Test Well #2 (to #1) 1 ewk 10/19/19 10/26/19 291 1.7.7 Reheat Well #3 1 emon 3/27/20 4/26/20 292 1.7.8 Move Test Equipment 1 ewk 4/10/20 4/17/20 293 1.7.9 Test Well #3 (to as many slimholes as required) 1 emon 4/26/20 5/26/20 2/15/18 20180203 - GEUDP-WS-SCH-PRM-001 Rev 3 Waesano Schedule Page 7 of 7 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) Appendix G Forestry Data and Information  Letter from Head of Forest Gazette Agency (Balai Pemantapan Kawasan Hutan – BPKH) Region IV letter dated 1st March 2018  Sesok BirdLife Data Zone Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM G ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) Appendix H Stakeholder Engagement Plan Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM H Stakeholder Engagement Plan Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Waesano Exploration Geothermal Activity PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 June 6 2018 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Agni Nur Primitasari Kimberlee Myers Novianto Hadisuwito Andrew Sembel Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position st 0 January 19 2018 1 Draft -signed- Andrew Sembel Project Director nd 1 February 2 2018 2 Draft -signed- Andrew Sembel Project Director 2 March 20 2018 Final Draft -signed- Andrew Sembel Project Director 3 June 6 2018 FInal Andrew Sembel Project Director Distribution List # Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name 1 PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) PreparedFor: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Prepared by: Agni Nur Primitasari E: AgniNur.Primitasari@aecom.com PT AECOM Indonesia South Quarter Building Tower-C 5th-floor Jl. R.A. Kartini Kav.8 Jakarta Selatan Jakarta - Indonesia aecom.com Printed on recycled paper notice. © 2018 PT AECOM Indonesia. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by PT AECOM Indonesia (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. PreparedFor: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................. 6 1.2 OBJECTIVE AND THE USE OF THE REPORT ..................................................................................... 6 1.3 SEP SCOPE ................................................................................................................................. 6 2. REGULATION AND REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................................ 8 2.1 NATIONAL REGULATIONS ............................................................................................................... 8 2.2 INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES ......................................................................................................... 8 2.3 PT SMI – GEOTHERMAL ENERGY UPSTREAM DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (GEUDP) ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK (ESMF) ................................................................................... 9 3. SUMMARY OF PAST STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES AND ISSUE IDENTIFICATION .................................................................................................................................. 10 3.1 PRE-ESIA BASELINE SOCIALIZATION ........................................................................................... 10 3.2 PUBLIC CONSULTATION ............................................................................................................... 10 W AE SANO .................................................................................................................................... 11 3.3 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT DURING ESIA BASELINE STUDY ...................................................... 11 3.3.1 First Round of ESIA Baseline Study .................................................................................. 11 3.3.2 Second Round of ESIA Baseline Study ............................................................................. 11 3.4 ESIA DISCLOSURE (SECOND PUBLIC CONSULTATION) AND JOIN-W ALKTHROUGH SURVEY ............. 11 3.5 CSR ACTIVITIES......................................................................................................................... 12 3.6 IDENTIFIED KEY ISSUES............................................................................................................... 12 4. STAKEHOLDER IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS ................................................................ 18 4.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 18 4.2 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY.................................................................................................. 18 4.2.1 Field Survey and Stakeholder Interview ............................................................................ 19 4.2.2 Determining Engagement Level and Method .................................................................... 20 4.3 STAKEHOLDER IDENTIFICATION .................................................................................................... 22 4.4 STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................ 24 5. ON-GOING AND FUTURE STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM .............................. 29 5.1 PROPOSED STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES ................................................................... 29 5.2 DEGREE/LEVEL OF ENGAGEMENT................................................................................................ 36 5.3 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM ..................................................................................... 37 5.3.1 Disclosure of Information ................................................................................................... 37 5.3.2 Communications and Engagement Strategy ..................................................................... 37 5.3.3 Consultation with Women and Vulnerable People ............................................................ 38 6. GRIEVANCE MECHANISM ........................................................................................................ 39 6.1 STEP 1: ACCESS POINT / COMPLAINT UPTAKE.............................................................................. 39 6.2 STEP 2: GRIEVANCE LOG ............................................................................................................ 40 6.3 STEP 3: ASSESSMENT, ACKNOWLEDGMENT, AND RESPONSE ........................................................ 40 6.4 STEP 4: APPEALS ....................................................................................................................... 41 6.5 STEP 5: RESOLVE AND FOLLOW-UP ............................................................................................. 41 6.6 TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION .................................................................................................. 41 7. ORGANISATIONAL ARRANGEMENT, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ............................. 43 8. MONITORING AND REPORTING ............................................................................................. 45 8.1 MONITORING AND EVALUATION .................................................................................................... 45 8.2 REPORTING ................................................................................................................................ 45 8.3 REQUIREMENTS FOR SEP UPDATE.............................................................................................. 45 APPENDIX A PRE-SOCIALIZATION REPORT ................................................................................... 47 APPENDIX B PUBLIC CONSULTATION Q&A, MINUTES MEETING, AND PARTICIPATORY MAPS .............................................................................................................................................................. 48 PreparedFor: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 APPENDIX C PUBLIC CONSULTATION PHOTO DOCUMENTATION .............................................. 49 APPENDIX D PUBLIC CONSULTATION PRESENTATION MATERIAL ............................................ 50 APPENDIX E ESIA DISCLOSURE MINUTES MEETING, ATTENDANCE LIST, PHOTOS DOCUMENTATION, AND PRESENTATION MATERIAL ..................................................................... 51 Figures Figure 4-1 Power and Interest Analysis................................................................................................................. 18 Figure 4-2 Proposed Project Location and SEP Study Area ................................................................................. 21 Figure 4-3 Power and Interest of Stakeholder in Wae Sano Exploration Project .................................................. 28 Figure 6-1 Grievance Redress Mechanism ........................................................................................................... 39 Figure 7-1 Exploration Site Team .......................................................................................................................... 43 Tables Table 3-1 Summary of Stakeholder Engagement Activities To-Date ..................................................................... 14 Table 4-1 Summary of Stakeholder Consultation during the ESIA Development .................................................. 19 Table 4-2 Engagement Levels and Methods ......................................................................................................... 20 Table 4-3 Stakeholder Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 25 Table 5-1 Stakeholder Engagement Programs ..................................................................................................... 30 Table 5-2 Degree/Level of Regular Stakeholder Engagement .............................................................................. 36 Table 6-1 PT SMI Postal Address.......................................................................................................................... 42 Table 7-1 Roles and Responsibilities of PT. SMI ................................................................................................... 44 PreparedFor: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 1. Introduction 1.1 Background This Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP) is prepared by PT AECOM Indonesia on behalf of PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (PT SMI) for the Wae Sano Geothermal Exploration Project (herein after “the Project”) as part of SMI Geothermal Energy Upstream Development (GEUDP) Project. This document is developed as part of the ESIA (Environmental and Social Impact Assessment) process undertaken for the Project financing purposes, focusing on exploration stage of the Project. However, this SEP is meant to be a living document which allows the Project to use the framework proposed for the on-going stakeholder engagement strategy for its future phase of exploitation. Regular updates are suggested following the Project development and changes in local social structure and stakeholders dynamic. The financing of the Project is funded through the World Bank. Thereby the SEP has been prepared in line with the GEUDP Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) on Consultation and Disclosure which has adopted the World Bank Safeguard Policies (including OP 4.01, 4.11, and 4.12). In addition, reference to the World Bank’s Environmental and Social Standard 10 (ESS-10) on Stakeholder Engagement and Information Disclosure (which is planned to be launched in 2018) is also used in development of this document. This SEP is owned by the Project who will be committed to and accountable to ensure meaningful consultation with the affected people in order to avoid/minimize and/or mitigate its impacts to the environment and community. Of note, this SEP is developed during the design phase of the Project exploration, therefore has also included some measures to help the Project for alternative design selections. 1.2 Objective and the Use of the Report This SEP is developed with the main purpose of achieving the objectives and expected outcomes as follows:  To meet Indonesian Regulations as well as the World Bank Safeguard Policy and GEUDP ESMF regarding stakeholder engagement to improve social risks management in whole project cycle and help in obtaining a social license to operate through a better understanding of key individual Project stakeholders;  To assist the Project in the engagement and information disclosure to communities and internal corporate standards related to stakeholder engagement activities;  To assess the level of stakeholder interest and understanding community concerns, to support for the Project to enable stakeholder’s views and concerns on the Project impacts to be taken into account in the Project design and environmental and social performance, and that the impact mitigations are addressed adequately in the ESMP;  To ensure that appropriate project information on environmental and social risks and impacts is disclosed to stakeholders in a timely, understandable, accessible and appropriate manner and format;  To provide project-affected parties with accessible and inclusive means to raise issues and grievances, and allow the Project to respond to and manage such grievances. 1.3 SEP Scope This SEP applies to the Wae Sano geothermal exploration phase only, and includes guidelines for establishing and maintaining good relationships with relevant stakeholders throughout Wae Sano exploration activities. In addition, it provides general framework on stakeholder engagement strategy for the Project future phase of exploitation. The scope of the SEP as structured in in this document includes the following: 1. Overview of the SEP background and objective; 6 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 2. Regulatory framework and international standard requirements for stakeholder engagement; 3. Historical and recent stakeholder engagement activities carried out to -date including approach for undertaking consultation during the ESIA development; 4. Identification and stakeholders analysis, including description of stakeholder relationships (interest and concern) with the Project; 5. Proposed engagement plan for the future stages of the Project; 6. Details of the process for managing stakeholder’s concerns and grievances; 7. The Project organisational arrangement for implementing the SEP; and 8. Monitoring and reporting, which details the mechanism to record, monitor, evaluate, and report on the implementation of the stakeholder engagement process. Of note, in terms of stakeholders addressed in this SEP, this document assesses only those that are external to project implementation. These “external” parties are those who have an interest or are able to influence project operations, such as affected individuals and communities, local government authorities, non -governmental and other civil society organizations, academia, media and other interested or affected parties. Internal stakeholders, who are not considered in this document, are those that are internal to implementation of the project, such as contractors, suppliers, distributors and customers of Wae Sano. These internal stakeholders are not addressed in this document as they are part of the core business function of exploration and are subject to national regulations and established company policies and procedures. 7 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 2. Regulation and Requirements This SEP is developed as in accordance with the GEUDP ESMF principles and in line with Indonesia Regulation, including the Environmental Ministry Regulation No. 05/2012 on Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Environmental Permit Process. The followings are national laws and regulations, international guidelines, as well as the corporate policies and procedures apply to this SEP and serve as reference documents. 2.1 National Regulations 1. Geothermal Law No. 21 of 2014, states that as the Geothermal License Holder, the Company shall implement Community Empowerment and Development Programs that could be started with engaging the community. 2. Law No. 23 of 2009, on Environmental Protection and Management concerning community rights which includes: equal entitlement to a good and healthy environment; entitlement to information about potential impacts; and entitlement to play a role in the framework of environmental management. 3. Corporate Law No. 40 of 2007 states that the Company that works in or related to natural resources shall implement the Social Corporate Responsibility Program. 4. Government Regulation No. 27 of 2012, Article 9 (paragraph 4) of Government Regulation of Republic of Indonesia Number 27/2012 regarding Environmental Impact Assessment, states that within ten working days of the date of the announcement proposed activities, interested members of the community have the right to suggest, express opinions and provide input regarding the planned activities. 5. Government Regulation No. 47 of 2012 observes all companies having business activities in the field of and/or related to natural resources to implement social and environmental Responsibility. 6. Environmental Ministry Decree No. 17 of 2012 related to Public Participation in Environmental Impact Analysis (AMDAL) and Environmental Permit. One of the objectives of this decree is to provide the community rights in the decision of a project’s feasibility, in particular projects which have significant impacts on the environment and/or the community. 7. Head of BAPEDAL Decree (KepKa) No. 8 of 2000, on Disclosure of Information on the AMDAL Process. This decree highlights the protection of community from the impacts of business operation, community participation and open communication in the preparation of environmental impact assessment. 8. Decree of Head of Environmental Impact Management Agency No. 8 of 2000, regarding Community Involvement and Information Availability in the Process of Environmental Impact Assessment requires the Project to announce the project in the mass media and to obtain input by the public. 9. Law No. 2/2012 regarding Land Acquisition for Development of Public Interest requires Public Consultation to seek agreement from community and land owners for land acquisition process. 2.2 International Guidelines This SEP is developed to meet the requirements of the following World Bank Safeguard Policy:  OP/BP 4.01 on Environmental Assessment;  OP/BP 4.04 on Natural Habitats, since project interventions including drilling and access roads are near (or possibly within) protected areas including conservation areas and the unique acid lake environment, for which provisions of appropriate conservation and mitigation measures will be necessary during works;  OP/BP 4.11 on Physical and Cultural Resources as a precautionary measure, no known resources have been identified during screening;  OP/BP 4.36 on Forests, since the forested areas may be part of the future project area of influence; and 8 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002  OP/BP 4.36 4.12 on Involuntary Resettlement. If land acquisition is needed it is likely to be on a willing buyer / willing seller basis, but there may be some involuntary land purchases for road alignments or future restrictions on access to forest resources. In addition, some references to the World Bank Environmental and Social Standard (ESS) 10 on Stakeholder Engagement and Information Disclosure are made. This ESS recognizes the importance of open and transparent engagement between the Project and project stakeholders as an essential element of good international practice. Effective stakeholder engagement can improve the environmental and social sustainability of projects, enhance project acceptance, and make a significant contribution to successful project design and implementation. This ESS 10 may apply for the Project future stage as it will apply to all new Bank investment projects when it launches in 2018, and should be implemented in conjunction with ESS1 (Assessment and Management of Environmental and Social Risks and Impacts). Requirements regarding engagement with workers are found in ESS2 (Labor and Working Conditions). In the case of projects involving involuntary resettlement or impacts on cultural heritage, the Project will also apply the special disclosure and consultation requirements set out in ESS5 (Land Acquisition, Restrictions on Land Use and Involuntary Resettlement) and ESS8 (Cultural Heritage). 2.3 PT SMI – Geothermal Energy Upstream Development Project (GEUDP) Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) This document details the environmental and social safeguard policies, principles, procedures, institutional arrangements, and workflows of PT SMI to guide the avoidance, minimization, or mitigation of any adverse environmental or social impacts of infrastructure projects supported by the Geothermal Energy Upstream Development Project (GEUDP). In the GEUDP ESMF principles, the SEP is developed for the Project as a means to:  Build and maintain a constructive relationship with the stakeholders, in particular project -affected communities;  Promote improved environmental and social performance through effective engagement with the stakeholders;  Promote and provide means for adequate engagement with project-affected communities throughout the project cycle on issues that could potentially affect them and to ensure that meaningful environmental and social information is disclosed to them and to other stakeholders;  Ensure that all stakeholders have ways to access project information and raise issues; and  Ensure that project-affected communities have accessible means to raise issues and grievances, and the Project Company respond to and manage such issues and grievances appropriately. Under the GEUDP Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) on Consultation and Disclosure, the Project needs to identify stakeholders and prepare a Stakeholder Engagement Plan early in project feasibility and at the basic screening step, which will be further developed through the detailed screening step. The Project will be required to undertake a stakeholder analysis before the consultation process. A stakeholder analysis includes:  Identify the individuals and groups with interest in the project and those expected to be affected by the project;  Identify experts and key informants;  Determine the nature and scope of consultation with each type of stakeholder; and  Determine the appropriate communication tools, timeframes, and methods. Stakeholders will vary depending on the sub-project location, but are expected to include: host communities, land owners and users, environmental and social NGOs, local government agencies, forestry concession holders/owners, forest departments, conservation departments, universities and other research organizations and business owners. 9 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 3. Summary of Past Stakeholder Engagement Activities and Issue Identification This section provides a summary of public consultations and disclosure activities that have been conducted by SMI to date, including during the development of the ESIA which is also still being finalized at the time this SEP is developed. 3.1 Pre-ESIA Baseline Socialization Pre-socialization was conducted at Bintang Flores Hotel, Labuan Bajo, East Nusa Tenggara on Thursday 15 September 2016. Pre-socialization activities were carried out to communicate the preliminary understanding to the target audience related to the development of geothermal projects to be undertaken by the government, as well as a means to obtaining feedback from the public related to the preparation of public socialization activities to be undertaken at a later stage. The pre-socialization event was held at 3 PM and was attended by the Head of Regency and Vice Regency of West Manggarai, the regional work units (SKPD), representatives of community leaders, religious leaders, traditional leaders, youth leaders, and representatives of non-governmental organizations. It was also attended by representatives of the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Directorate of Geothermal and Geological Agency, PT SMI and a World Bank representative. After providing project information, the following general outcomes and next steps occurred:  The local government i.e. West Manggarai government are willing to support development of the Wae Sano geothermal exploration project and has issued a Regency Decree regarding establishment of a Coordination Team formation that consists of several West Manggarai government unit works (SKPD).  Received feedback and suggestion from all participants regarding the project development.  The next public consultation meetings to be held between October – November 2016 in project area of influence (AOI) i.e. Sano Nggoang Sub-district and the participants will consist of potential impacted community from Wae Sano Village, Sano Nggoang Village and Pulau Nuncung Village. A complete minute of meeting is attached in Appendix A of this document. 3.2 Public Consultation Following pre-socialization in September 2016, public consultation I took place at the Wae Sano Village Office, Sano Nggoang Sub-district on 3 November 2016. Socialization was carried out in accordance with Ministry of Environment Regulation No. 17 of 2012 regarding Guidelines for Community Involvement in the Environmental Impact Assessment Process. Stakeholders involved in the consultation included social/community leaders, sub- district and village heads from villages in the Project area as well as local government officials. The high-level conclusions from the meeting were:  Community generally agreed with the Wae Sano geothermal project with some notes on mitigation for potential negative impact.  Community expected to be informed and involved in all project activities/stages.  The Project need to engage and create coordination between local government with local community A complete minute of meeting is attached in Appendix B of this document. 10 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 3.3 Wae SanoStakeholder Engagement during ESIA Baseline Study The objective of the stakeholder engagement activities undertaken as part of the ESIA process is to meet the relevant requirements of the GEUDP ESMF in relation to consultation and disclosure requirements. Consultations to project affected people must be initiated as early as possible and throughout project implementation to take their views regarding environmental and social aspects. A range of stakeholder engagement and consultation were conducted during the ESIA for the Project, as discussed in the following sub-sections. 3.3.1 First Round of ESIA Baseline Study The first round of socio-economic data gathering was conducted from 3 to 6 November 2016 in Sano Nggoang Sub-district to gather baseline information including livelihood condition, cultural activities, health and safety conditions and community perception, focusing on the 2 villages of Sano Nggoang and Wae Sano, following the initial design of the proposed project location was located in these 2 villages. Data on community perception was obtained from 96 respondents; most of the respondents (85%) agreed with the development of Project in the area of Wae Sano Village; however the respondents also raised concerns regarding the project’s environmental impact during construction, natural disasters and unsuccessful exploration activities. Following this, a consultation with the local community was conducted from 21 to 23 March 2017, focused on participatory sensitivity mapping with community members to identify local sensitive receptors e.g. cultural sites, religious place, springs etc. to minimize potential impact from project development to sensitive areas. Sensitivity mapping also had the benefit of collecting additional social baseline data of the community in Pulau Nuncung Village. 3.3.2 Second Round of ESIA Baseline Study Additional baseline study was undertaken from 22 – 30 November 2017 following changes in the Project alternatives (including new well pads alternatives and additional road widening areas). A number of stakeholder consultations were conducted in order to obtain a better understanding of the environmental and social issues in the community surrounding the project locations. Consultation with stakeholders focused on land status and obtaining baseline information on socio-cultural aspects. The additional consultation identified new information regarding cultural issues at the location of the proposed well pads areas, which would affect the Project land acquisition process. Some of the proposed well pads areas were located in old historical villages of Mata Wae – sub-ethnic group of the Manggaraian people, who are pre– dominant in the community within the Project area of influence (AOI). Further details of this information are presented in Section 6 and Section 8 of the ESIA. 3.4 ESIA Disclosure (Second Public Consultation) and Join-Walkthrough Survey ESIA disclosure and consultation was conducted at the Wae Sano Village Office, Sano Nggoang Sub-district on 15 May 2018. The consultation main objective was to deliver information about potential impact of environment and social of the Project exploration. Stakeholders involved in the consultation included social/community leaders, Labuan Bajo Regency Government, Sano Nggoang Sub-district government and village heads from three villages in the Project area as well as local government officials. This public consultation also attended by Indonesian Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources and World Bank representative (see Minutes Meeting and other documentation in Appendix E). In addition to the ESIA disclosure session, a join-walk though visit was conducted, in the 14-15 May 2018 with local community and land owners. Some of the proposed areas for the main well pads located within community land (i.e. Well Pad A, B, and E) were visited, as well as location for disposal. However, the survey did not visit the road widening areas, as they are considered owned by regional road agency. During the visit, it was identified that some of the well alternative locations were not feasible to be developed (i.e. Well Pad B1 alternative) due to land contour of the area. This was fed into the finalisation of the Project design and planning. On the other side, 11 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 further consultation is requested to obtain land owner approval and confirmation of boundary of area considered as culturally significant land. The following key issues were raised during the disclosure event and join-walkthrough survey that are considered essential for finalisation of the Project design process and planning:  Community generally agreed with the current proposed Wae Sano Geothermal Project design, however clarity on the land compensation process was asked;  The proposed locations for Well Pad A, D, and E were confirmed during the join-walkthrough survey and have been acknowledged by local community and land owners, however during the ESIA disclosure meeting there were disagreement from some community members and land owners with regard to Well Pad B location, due to the found of “nekara” by the Head of Village which he believed as a sacred object;  Community expected to be informed and involved in all project activities/stages, especially on local workforces recruitment;  The Project need to engage local government and community during the current preparation of the Project as well as later during the Project implementation; and  Expectation from local community that the Project should always respect local customs and belief. 3.5 CSR Activities Aligned with its commitments towards sustainability, PT SMI has implemented a range of corporate social responsibility (CSR) programs for the villages within the Project AOI. These CSR activities are part of the Project stakeholder engagement strategy to obtain a social license to operate prior to commencing its exploration activities. CSR activities in collaboration with the West Manggarai Health Office with the tagline of “ Tumbuh Sehat Bersama” are focusing on health awareness and assistance was held on 2 October 2017. It was conducted with students in 3 primary schools, the activities included:  Counselling and medical check-up for teeth and gums  Height and weight measurement for students  Providing a nutrition breakfast and toothbrush  In collaboration with the 3 primary schools construct a green garden in the school area namely “Pojok Hijau SMI”. The beneficiaries of this CSR program included 93 students from primary school (SD) Sano Nggoang, 60 students from SD Nunang and 95 students from SD Dasak. All 3 schools are located in the AOI (Area of Interest) of the Wae Sano geothermal project. 3.6 Identified Key issues There were several key issues raised in community engagement activities; some of these issues are addressed in the current design process for the Project which is still being finalised at the time this SEP is developed. in addition, they are also considered in the assessment of potential social impacts of the Project (in the ESIA), and management measures to address the issues are proposed in the Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP), attached to the ESIA which is currently still being finalised. A number of key issues reported during the ESIA baseline survey, include the following, while details issues per each past engagement presented in the Table 3-1:  Employment and business opportunities related to the project;  Fears of mud flow (as occurred in the ‘Lapindo case’);  Impacts to natural preserve and physical cultural resources e.g. Sano Nggoang Lake, spring water, old historical villages; 12 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002  Land acquisition process; and  Expectation for CSR program in the form of socio-economic empowerment and infrastructure developmentt. These issues were also raised during the first and second round of public participation which also involved women, although in limited number (see Table 3-1, also Appendix A and B). Of note, most of the past engagement was undertaken in informal setting, some were conducted using Bahasa Indonesia, while consultations for the ESIA baseline was conducted during data gathering facilitated by local surveyors. In addition, during the ESIA disclosure and join-walkthrough survey, some issues were identified concerning the presence of local cultural objects (i.e. Nekara) on the proposed Well Pad B location. 13 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Table 3-1 Summary of Stakeholder Engagement Activities To-Date Date of No Location Theme Participants Type of Engagement Information Disseminated Key Issues Raised consultation 1 15 Bintang Flores Pre-  MEMR representative Public consultation  Preliminary information and Details of pre-socialisation meeting results are presented September Hotel, Labuan Socialization  Head of West Manggarai meeting understanding related to the in the Appendix A, some of the topic discussed including: 2016 Bajo Flores Regency with his team (unit development of geothermal  Potential positive and negative impact work/SKPD) projects including introduction of  Mitigation of potential impact  50 local people from Sano the proponent (PTSMI)  Project footprint for land acquisition and procurement Nggoang Sub-district  Purpose of the project process  NGO including WWF and  Benefits of the project  Public consultation to project affected communities BirdLife International  Next round of public consultation 2 18 October Wae Sano Public Secretary of Wae Sano dan One-on-one meeting Coordination meeting for  Local government providing suggestion for appropriate 2016 and Sano consultation Sano Nggoang villages preparation of Public Consultation location and method for undertaking consultation Nggoang preparation meeting villages  Identification of key stakeholders and community representative to be consulted/ engaged 3 19 October MEMR West UKL-UPL  West Manggarai District unit One-on-one meeting  Study team (AECOM) for UKL- Coordination with West Manggarai District unit works 2016 Manggarai study and works (MEMR, Environmental, UPL study during UKL-UPL and ESIA study Office Public Public Works)  Preparation of pubic consultation Consultation preparation 4 3 November Sano Public  MoEM representative Public Consultation  Dissemination information Details of pre-socialisation meeting results are presented 2016 Nggoang Sub- Consultation  Head of Sano Nggoang Sub- meeting regarding geothermal potential in the Appendix B, some of the topic discussed including: district Office district with his team source in Waisano  Wae Sano is a tourism area on Flores i.e. Sano  Police and Military sub-district  UKL – UPL & ESHIA study as a Nggoang Lake and bird watching; the Project needs to representative part environmental permitting minimize potential impacts to birds  Head of affected villages:  Project work plan, stages &  Question was raised concerning the possibility of Wae Sano, Sano Nggoang schedule accidents that may occur, referring to the past and Pulau Nuncung Indonesia experience of Lapindo mud flow incident  Project affected communities  Disclose and provide information for every project activities  Local community involvement for employment opportunities 5 3–6 Wae Sano Socio- Head of villages, cultural leader,  One-on-one Data collection for UKL-UPL and  Socio-economic profile of the local community in the 2 November Village and economics youth, women and households meeting ESIA villages 14 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Date of No Location Theme Participants Type of Engagement Information Disseminated Key Issues Raised consultation 2016 Sano baseline study  Interview  Health condition of the community Nggoang (questionnaire  Survey  Community perception: Village and interview) questionnaire - Expectation for positive benefit of geothermal project, including for community welfare and electricity - Expectation for fair compensation of land acquisition, in the meantime there was a concern that compensation will be spent in short time, so it is expected that the Project will support longer time livelihood restoration program - Concern that geothermal project activities may damage environment condition of green areas and birds, while the forest, water, and air condition within the area are still clean - Concern regarding sulphur and mud leaking 6 21 – 23 Wae Sano, Sensitivity Head of villages, cultural leader, Focus Group  Data collection for UKL-UPL and  Mapping of the potential sensitive environment and March 2017 Sano Mapping youth, women and households Discussion (FGD) ESIA social receptors within the Project AOI Nggoang and Analysis  Participatory mapping  Potential issues pertaining to the Project land Pulau acquisition Nuncung  Community perception Villages 7 22 – 30 Wae Sano Second round  Head of Wae Sano Village  One-on-one  Observation for Physical Cultural  Changes of project alternative November Village; Sub- of baseline and his unit meeting Resources PCR based on  Baseline conditions of the new proposed areas, 2017 district Office; study  Tu’a Golo from Sub-village of  Interview session Participatory Map and project including environmental, land use and socio-cultural Tourism Office Wae Sano alternative issues potentially affected land acquisition process for  Camat of Sano Nggoang Sub-  Land tenure for access road the Project district  Tourism plan  Land acquisition scheme and implementation  West Manggarai Cultural and  Physical cultural resources identification including Tourism representative historical village areas on the proposed well pad  Wae Sano youth  Tourism plan in Wae Sano village representative 8 2 October Sano CSR activities Three Primary Schools in Sano Community Health awareness and check-up for CSR program deliveries 2017 Nggoang Sub- Nggoang Sub-district engagement students in three primary schools in district the Project AOI 15 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Date of No Location Theme Participants Type of Engagement Information Disseminated Key Issues Raised consultation 9 9 May 2018 Burung Socio culture Burung Indonesia field manager One-on-one meeting  Public consultation and content  Key role of Tu’a Golo Indonesia in Wae Sano related with Burung Indonesia  Custom ceremony for begin and closing the activity Office community  Invitation letter  How to enggage community 10 10 May 2018 House of the Invite to public Head of Sano Nggoang Sub- One-on-one meeting  The general content of public  Camat will be attend consultation II  State of support to the eksploration project Sano consultation II district  Who to invite Nggoang Sub-  Ask for support to project district Head 11 11 May 2018 House of Tu’a Introduction, Tu’a Golo Nunang, Tu’a Beo Stakeholder  The general content of public  Local custom must be respected. consultation II  There is information that one of wellpad is located in Golo Nunang interview and Nunang consultation and the Nunang sacred village, if it is true then we reject it. (Custom consultation discussion because it will affect us in the future. Leader)  How about ceremony and local culture  Custom structure and role of Tu’a Golo  History of Village 12 10-14 May Wae Sano, Distributing Head of villages, cultural leader,  One-on-one  The general content of public  A number community invited in each villages consultation II  Project perception and updating issues about project 2018 Sano invitation letter community figure meeting  Who to invite Nggoang and and interview  Interview  Ask for support to project Pulau Nuncung Villages 13 14 May 2018 Each project Walktrough of Sano Nggoang Sub-district and  Survey  Location of project (wellpad,  According to head of village and some community disposal, camp, water members, Wellpad B is located in culturally sensitivity location in land staff, Tu’a Golo Lempe, Tu’a  Discussion traetment). area for Nunang sub-village (sacred land), however Wae Sano boundaries Golo Nunang (representative),  Information of land boundaries this was not confirmed by other villagers during the Village and land owners, ESIA disclosure event  Information of land owners within boundaries area  Questions from community regarding land acquisition process, by land lease or purchase 14 15 May 2018 Wae Sano ESIA  MEMR representative Consultation of ESIA  Dissemination information Details of public consultation meeting results are Village office disclosure  Ministry of Finance and proposed regarding geothermal potential presented in the Appendix E, some of the topic discussed  Ministry of Energy and Mineral mitigation measures source in Waisano including: Resources  Potential impacts and proposed  Wae Sano is a tourism area on Flores i.e. Sano  Head of West Manggarai mitigation measures Nggoang Lake and bird watching; the Project will Regency with his team (unit  UKL – UPL & ESHIA study as a maximizing potential resources work/SKPD) part environmental permitting  Question was raised by some local figures concerning 16 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Date of No Location Theme Participants Type of Engagement Information Disseminated Key Issues Raised consultation  Head of Sano Nggoang Sub-  Project work plan, stages & the location of wellpad B, however this was disagreed schedule district with his team by larger part of community.  Environment and Social Impact  Police and Military district and Management  Disclose and provide information for each project sub-district representative activities and stages  Head of affected villages:  Local community involvement for employment opportunities Wae Sano, Sano Nggoang  Respect for local custom and culture. and Pulau Nuncung  Project affected communities 15 15 May 2018 Wellpad B Additional visit  Regent Secretary, Head of  Survey Some concerns regarding the Due to unclear boundary and also some different to ensure the Wae Sano Village, and former  Discussion cultural significance of the land. information regarding the cultural significance value of the location of Head of Wae Sano Village However the exact area boundary it land for some of the local figures against larger community sacred land was unclear, as different locations members, further consultation and discussion with land within the were referred by the Head of Wae owners and communities are required. proposed well Sano Village and Regent Secretary pad B location 16 16 May 2018 Wae Sano Consultation Tu’a Beo of Nunang Sub-Village Stakeholder Some concerns regarding the Different perception in community, some part of Village (house about wellpad consultation and cultural significance of the land community members agreed and doesnt have objection of Tu’a Beo B discussion with regard to the sacred land status for well pad B. So Nunang) further disscuss with community is important for finalizing the Project design. 17 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 4. Stakeholder Identification and Analysis 4.1 Introduction Stakeholders are defined as people or entities that are affected or may have an interest in the Project. Stakeholders are individuals or groups of people who have an interest in and/or can influence any decision or activity of the Company. External stakeholders are those external to the core business operational activities, such as affected individuals and communities, local government authorities, non-governmental and other civil society organizations, local institutions and other interested or affected parties. Internal stakeholders are employees, suppliers, distributors, contractors and customers who are not addressed in this stakeholder engagement plan as these interactions are subject to national laws and regulations and company policies and procedures as part of core business activities. 4.2 Approach and Methodology Before any engagement process begins, it is important to consider and define the engagement approach that is being applied to each stakeholder (with each engagement approach being tailored to that specific stakeholder). A common approach is to map the interest and power or influence of each stakeholder group and correlate the engagement approach based on the quadrant it falls in (Bryson 1995). Figure 4-1 below shows four types of engagement approach that can be applied for this project: Source: Stakeholdermap.com Figure 4-1 Power and Interest Analysis 18 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 4.2.1 Field Survey and Stakeholder Interview The development of this SEP is based on stakeholder interview undertaken during the field survey for ESIA scoping and baseline studies conducted in stages, since September 2016 to the latest one in November 2017. Results from the interviews are used to identify relevant stakeholders of importance for the Project; appropriate on-going and future engagement should be undertaken during the Project lifecycle. Figure 4-2 below shows the scope of study area for this SEP overlay with the proposed Project Area of Interest boundary consisting of the Project well pads location and supporting facilities, and access road, while summary of stakeholder interviews during this period is presented in the following table. Table 4-1 Summary of Stakeholder Consultation during the ESIA Development Time Stakeholders Consulted Key Issues Location of Interest 3-6 Community of Wae Sano Livelihood condition, cultural activities, health and Wae Sano and Sano November and Sano Nggoang Village, safety condition and community perception of the 2 Nggoang Village 2016 interview for the first round villages baseline study 21-23 March Group discussion with Head Participatory Sensitivity Mapping Wae Sano, Sano 2017 of villages, Cultural leader, Nggoang, and Pulau youth, women and Nuncung Village household 21-23 March Interview with Pulau Livelihood condition and cultural of importance for Pulau Nuncung 2017 Nuncung village locals, and community perception Village government 26 November Wae Sano Village Head Overview of Wae Sano community and village Wae Sano Village 2017 development 27 November Community Leader Nunang History of Nunang family, ancestors, archeological Wae Sano Village 2017 Clan/Family – Former of findings, historic village Head of Wae Sano Village Tu’a Golo Nunang (Wellpad History of Mata Wae People, historic village, cultural Wae Sano Village B) asset and activity, land identification Local community of Wae Land cover and land status survey of well pad A, B, D, Wae Sano Village Sano village E 28 November Tu’a Golo Lempe (Wellpad History of Lempe family, historic village, cultural asset Wae Sano Village 2017 A) and activity, land identification Tu’a Golo Dasak (Wellpad History of Dasak family, historic village, cultural asset Wae Sano Village D) and activity, land identification Head of Sano Nggoang Consultation for the land owners regarding land Sano Nggoang Sub- Sub-district acquisition district Head of Local Government Consultation for the land owners regarding land Sano Nggoang Sub- Security Personnel acquisition district Local community of Sano Land cover and land status survey of access road Sano Nggoang Sub- Nggoang Sub-district improvement district 29 November Tu’a Golo Taal (Wellpad E) History of Nggoang/Taal family, historic village, Sano Nggoang 2017 cultural asset and activity, land identification Village Cultural and Tourism Office Regional tourism plan in West Manggarai and Wae West Manggarai West Manggarai Sano Village in particular Regency Burung Indonesia Tourism program in Wae Sano Village area and its Wae Sano Village Foundation/ NGO surrounding area Sano Nggoang Homestay Tourism activity and local economy Sano Nggoang Owner Village 9 May Burung Indonesia How to engage community, local customs and culture Wae Sano Village Foundation in Wae Sano, support statement from Burung Indonesia 11 May Head of Pulau Nuncung Livelihood condition and overview of Pulau Nuncung Pulau Nuncung 19 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Time Stakeholders Consulted Key Issues Location of Interest community. Village Tu’a Golo Nunang Cultural asset and customs activity, status of ‘Nekara” Nunang Sub-village found within the well pad B area in Nunang 15 May Regent Secretary Status of sacred land within well pad B, further Manggarai Barat discussion is needed with community and local Regency government. Head of Wae Sano Concern regarding Well Pad B Nunang Sub-village Former Head of Wae Sano Concerning regarding Well pad B Nunang Sub-village Village 16 May Tu’a Beo Nunang Community have different perception about the Nunang Sub-village significance of sacred land within the proposed Well Pad B area, so need more discussion to decide. 4.2.2 Determining Engagement Level and Method The engagement approach involved different degrees of stakeholder participation namely: (1) high power – high interest (the key player), (2) high interest –s low power (show consideration), (3) low power – low interest (the least important), and (4) high power – low interest (meet their needs). Once the type of engagement approach of stakeholders was mapped, the stakeholders were then prioritized in order of importance. The level and method of engaging with stakeholders that are best suited to the purpose and scope of engagement and to the relevant stakeholders was determined by defining the nature of the relationship they have or aim to develop with their stakeholders. The level of engagement will depend heavily on the stakeholder’s degree of influence over the Project by considering the stakeholder’s capacity on initiating ideas, mobilizing people, and legitimation, and degree of interest by considering the stakeholder’s motivation, benefit, modus, distance, and stance regarding their issues/concerns. The engagement level in terms of communication, consultation, participation and partnership usually is used in conditions where the stakeholders are in a position to support issues managed by the Project. If the stakeholders’ position is non-supportive the negotiation approach will be utilized. This approach may be practiced at all levels of engagement. Engagement may take place at more than one level. The owners of the engagement may choose to engage with the stakeholders in one segment of its stakeholder map at one level and with stakeholders in another segment of the stakeholder map at another. The level of engagement may also change over time as relationships become deepen and mature. The engagement method should be selected to best meet the needs, capacity and expectations of the relevant stakeholders. More than one method may be selected for any given engagement. Different methods may be used concurrently or sequentially. Consideration needs to be given to the relative merits of collective and individual consultation within stakeholder groups. For some groups, such as project affected peoples (PAPs), providing views in an independent collective forum of management (such as through their collective group) is an essential part of providing anonymity for individuals and enhancing their capacity for influence. Engagement owners should also include in their planning process activities and methods that are essential to engagement but are not themselves formal engagement methods. Stakeholder levels and associated methods are presented in Table 4-2. Table 4-2 Engagement Levels and Methods Level of Engagement Methods of Engagement Partnership Partnership Multi-stakeholder initiatives Participation Participatory decision-making process Focus Groups Advisory Building process Consultation Focus groups and consultation Feedback surveys Development Meetings 20 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Figure 4-2 Proposed Project Location and SEP Study Area 21 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 4.3 Stakeholder Identification Identification of stakeholders is the first step in the process of stakeholder engagement. This SEP has categorized stakeholders according to the following categories, while a detail of stakeholder analysis is presented in Table 4-3. 1. Communities, Social and Customary Institutions The Project affected communities are located in Sano Nggoang Sub-district, which consist of:  Wae Sano Village (Nunang, Lempe, Taal and Dasak Sub-Villages) – project development location;  Sano Nggoang Sub-district for improvement access road from Trans Flores to project location; and  Sano Nggoang and Pulau Nuncung Villages for indirect potential impact (economics and migration). Local community in these areas are dominated by Mata Wae community, sub-ethnic of Manggarai people. Dominant livelihood in the community is in agricultural sector (i.e. plantation). Further social baseline characteristic is provided in the ESIA. One of the important local institutions for community of Sano Nggoang area including Wae Sano Village is their customary institution, as represented in the role of Tu’a Golo as customary leader in the area. Their role in the community decision making process in relation to social matter is pretty essential, including facilitating dispute resolution. Another local stakeholder group need to be considered as the Project stakeholders are village organisations such as, Woman Organization (PKK), youth group, and Village Government Consultative Body (BPD). 2. Land Owners/ Project Affected People (PAP) Land owners of the land area required for the Project exploration development (including well pad, supporting facilities and access road) and their household members i.e. those who will be impacted from loss of land and income. 3. Women and Other Vulnerable Groups The basic considerations for vulnerability group are as follows:  Households with incomes less than the West Manggarai Regency Minimum Wage (IDR 17.1 million per annum) and under the poverty line (IDR 282,412 per month per capita) in 2016;  Sharecroppers – those who will lose their jobs/livelihood due to land acquisition;  Women-headed households without any other earning members; and  Households headed by elderly or with disabled children. Based on secondary data from Kecamatan Sano Nggoang Dalam Angka 2017 there are 158 household that are under the poverty line and categorized as pre-prosperous family in Sano Nggoang Sub-district with 39 households living in Wae Sano Village or 14% of the total households. The socio -economic survey found that 1 income from 41 household respondents was below the Regional Minimum Wage of West Manggarai District (see details in ESIA Section 6). However, at the time this SEP was developed, the number of vulnerable people impacted by land acquisition process was not yet identified and will be updated during the socio -economics census for the land owners. 4. Government The national and local government play an important role in the project. For the Project, the following government agencies and institutions are considered important stakeholders:  Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (MEMR);  Ministry of Environmental and Forestry; 1 Regional Minimum wage (Upah Minimum Regional, UMR) in West Manggarai Regency in 2016 was about 1,425,000 rupiahs per month (equal to USD 104.78) or 17,100,000 rupiahs per year (equal to USD 1,257.41) 22 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002  Ministry of Public Work;  Governor of East Nusa Tenggara;  Regency of West Manggarai including: Energy and Mineral Resources Office, Environmental Office, Forest Gazette Agency (Badan Pemantapan Kawasan Hutan Regional IV) Office, Public Work Agency, and Regional Planning Agency (BAPPEDA);  Regional Land Acquisition Committee or Team (LAT), including National Land Agency (Badan Pertanahan Nasional or BPN);  Task Force Unit for Forest Management (Unit Pelaksana Teknis Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan) of West Manggarai;  National Road Management Unit (Balai Pelaksanaan Jalan Nasional) in Kupang;  Local Road Office Agency (Dinas Bina Marga);  Military (TNI);  Police (POLRI);  Head of Sano Nggoang Sub-District (Camat); and  Head of Wae Sano, Sano Nggoang, and Pulau Nuncung Villages. 5. Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) National and International Non-Government Organizations and civil based organizations who are actively participating in social and environmental development are considered important Project external stakeholders. Indonesian regulations such as Law no 23/ 2009 on the Management and Protection of Environment urge the involvement of the public including NGOs to participate in Project development process and monitoring. NGOs can be a Project partner in implementing any programs related to environment, social and economic issues. A number of active NGOs and INGOs attended the Pre-Public Consultation and were identified as stakeholders including:  WWF;  Swiss contact;  Yayasan Burung Indonesia (Bird Life Indonesia);  Baku Peduli; and  GERAM. 6. Religious Institutions Religious institutions are a strategic stakeholder that the Project needs to engage to build strong local and regional relationships. The engagement might be in the form of a partnership, through co -operation and participation in the Project programs. The existence of the Paroki Santo Mikael Nunang who manages Santo Mikael Catholic Church is part from Wae Sano history and plays an important role in the religious and social life of Wae Sano people. 7. Private Businesses Private business stakeholders are those businesses that operate inside the Project AOI but are outside the Project’s contractors, suppliers, distributors and customers. Private businesses and local entrepreneurs are considered stakeholders to the Project. One of them is related to tourism e.g. homestay and tourism guide. These local tourism businesses are dominated by men, while women generally more involved in agricultural sector. 23 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 4.4 Stakeholder Analysis The Project’s key stakeholders were identified through a stakeholder analysis process at the beginning of the Project. During this process stakeholders were categorized by identity, roles and interest in and influence on the Project. The key stakeholders were categorized into three groups: 1. Directly Impacted Stakeholders: People or entities that are directly affected by the Project and/or have been identified as most vulnerable to changes due to the Project. They require engagement when identifying impacts, and during mitigation and management measure discussions. Direct stakeholders include land owners, village heads, community and religious leaders, the sub -district head, villagers in the project affected communities, the regency level and provincial level authorities such Environmental Office, Forestry Office, National Land Agency, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resource, Ministry of Forestry etc.; 2. Indirectly Impacted Stakeholders: People or entities who could be indirectly affected by the Project. Indirect stakeholders include NGOs, Community Based Organizations (CBOs); and 3. Other Relevant Stakeholders: People or entities who are interested in the Project or who can influence project operations. Analysis on the key stakeholders identified in this SEP study is shown in the list of stakeholders in the following Table 4-3. 24 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Table 4-3 Stakeholder Analysis Power/Influence and Type of Influence Area of Interest Level No Stakeholders Roles in the community Interest to the Project Stakeholder Stakeholders Power/ Interest Influence 1 Project Affected Community Community Local community with low influence in decision Wae Sano Village Low High Impacts from the Project development making process, but will be impacted by the Project activities (both positive and adverse impacts) 2 Tu’a Golo (Lempe and Nunang Customary Customary/cultural leader in Wae Sano, Wae Sano Village High High Cultural and land issue in relation to the Sub-villages), and their institution involved in community activity (informal leader, Project activities that may create impacts on assistance (Tu’a Beo) cultural activity, dispute resolution, project culture decision maker) 3 Youth and Women Group, and Village-based Outside local government structure, depends Wae Sano Village Low High Concern toward the Project adverse impacts other village organisation organisation on government budget and program, insecure on community, and expectation for benefit for existence from the Project e.g. through community development program 4 Land owners (PAP) and their Community Potential to loss of income and decrease Wae Sano Village Low High Impacts from land acquisition households livelihood, potential become vulnerable caused by loss of productive land 5 Women and other vulnerable Community Unsecure, mostly ignore for decision making Wae Sano Village Low Low Potential significant impacts from the Project groups development 6 Head of Wae Sano Village Government Important stakeholders for the Project, as Wae Sano Village High High Expectation for benefit from the Project legislator and decision point in the community, representative government administrative (village level), one of land owner of proposed well pad B 7 Former Head of Wae Sano Private Alternative figure for community beside Head of Wae Sano Village High High Concern to the sacred land in well pad B Village, family of Head of village and Tu’a Golo Village 8 Regent Secretary, family of Government/ Community figure in Nunang sub-village, he Wae Sano Village High High Concern regarding well pad B and how to Head of Village Private have influence and access to local government. project run 9 Head of Sano Nggoang Village Government Legislator and decision point in the community, Sano Nggoang Village High Low Expectation for potential benefit from the representative government administrative Project 25 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Power/Influence and Type of Influence Area of Interest Level No Stakeholders Roles in the community Interest to the Project Stakeholder Stakeholders Power/ Interest Influence (village level) 10 Head of Pulau Nuncung Village Government Legislator and decision point in the community, Pulau Nuncung Village High Low Expectation for potential benefit from the representative government administrative Project (village level) 11 Camat (Head of Sano Government Legislator and headed government activities at Sano Nggoang Sub- High High Expectation for potential benefit from the Nggoang Sub-district) Sub-district level, headed head of villages in District Project Sano Nggoang Sub-district 12 Pol PP Sano Nggoang Sub- Government Under Head of Sub-district, responsible for Sano Nggoang Sub- Low High Expectation for potential benefit from the district local security surrounding Sub-district area District Project 13 West Manggarai Regent with Government Permitting and government administrative West Manggarai Regency High Low Potential positive impact on regional his work team (SKPD) process development 14 Ministry of Mineral and Energy Government The main Project proponent which will be the National level High High Geothermal development for provision of Resources main implementer and decision maker for future national power target project 15 Environmental Office of West Government Permitting and monitoring for environmental West Manggarai Regency High Low Environmental permitting and monitoring Manggarai Regency activity and impact 16 Forestry Office of West Government Permitting and government administrative West Manggarai Regency High Low Permitting for forest land use Manggarai Regency process 17 Cultural & Tourism Office West Government Develop tourism development, plan, budget for West Manggarai Regency Low Low Cultural preservation and tourism Manggarai Regency cultural and tourism in West Manggarai; development important government agency for the Proponent 18 Religious leader i.e. priest Community Highly important stakeholders for community, Wae Sano Village High Low Potential adverse impact to local alternative leader for community beside Head community of village and Tu’a Golo 19 Bird Life Indonesia (Yayasan NGOs Important stakeholders for the existing bird National and International Low Low Potential impacts on birds and their habitat Burung Indonesia) habitat in Wae Sano, promote bird-tourism, level highly need to engage by the Proponent 20 Homestay owners Private Insecure, lack of support from government, Wae Sano Village Low Low Expectation for benefit from the Project, and 26 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Power/Influence and Type of Influence Area of Interest Level No Stakeholders Roles in the community Interest to the Project Stakeholder Stakeholders Power/ Interest Influence electricity and network coverage, might not concern regarding potential adverse impacts sustain for long-term business process on tourism 21 Local contractors Private Highly expectation for project plan, the issue is West Manggarai Regency Low High Expectation for benefit from the Project permitting and lack of operational support (vehicle, human resources etc.) 27 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Summary of the above analysis is presented in the following Figure 4-3 which shows where each stakeholder sits in relation to their power and influence on the Wae Sano geothermal project. High Quadrant IV Quadrant I Head of Sano Nggoang Village Head of Waesano Village Head of Pulau Nuncung Village Camat Head of West Manggarai Tua Golo Regent with his work team MEMR (SKPD) Environmental Office Forestry Office Priest Power Quadrant III Quadrant II Homestay owner PAPs Bird Life Indonesia Land owners Cultural & Tourism Office Youth and Women Group Local contractors Low High Interest Figure 4-3 Power and Interest of Stakeholder in Wae Sano Exploration Project Referring to the data displayed above, it can be seen that the majority of stakeholders who are concerned about the Project are in Quadrant IV (high power, low interest). The second majority, with a sizeable population, is in Quadrant I (high power, high interest). The stakeholders who support the project are spread across all quadrants; however, stakeholders in Quadrant 1 are dominated by community leaders in project location, their interest based on to gain benefit from the project phase, from land acquisition to local suppliers for the Project. The stakeholders that directly impacted by the Project i.e. community within project location, land owners and youth are in Quadrant II (low power, high interest) as local community without position in government and/or community, their power categorized in low power with high interest regarding project activities i.e. compensation benefit from land acquisition process and employment opportunities. 28 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 5. On-going and Future Stakeholder Engagement Program Referring to the result of issue identification (Section 3) and stakeholder analysis (Section 4), this section provides recommendation for on-going (during the current design process and pre construction stage) and future stakeholder engagement for the Project. Of note, the scope of this SEP mainly covers the exploration stage of the Project. General framework on stakeholder engagement strategy is provided for the Project future phase of exploitation. However it shall be modified and updated in accordance with the progress of project cycles as it entering exploitation stage. Proposed stakeholder engagement program at each different stage of the Project exploration phase is described in Section 5.1 to address some of the identified key issue associated with the potential Project impacts (see Section 3.5). The different exploration stages in which stakeholder engagement is necessary include:  Current project design process;  Pre-construction including the land acquisition process;  Construction of well pads and its supporting facilities;  Operation i.e. well drilling and testing; and  Decommissioning of exploration facilities and equipment. Meanwhile Section 5.2 presents the recommended level of regular engagement for each different stakeholder throughout exploration phase, referring to the stakeholder analysis result (in Section 4.4). In addition, a more general approach for future phase of the Project exploitation is discussed in Section 5.3. 5.1 Proposed Stakeholder Engagement Activities The following table shows the stakeholder engagement program at each different stage of the Project exploration phase. It covers engagement with external stakeholders such as government agencies, project affected communities, local land owners, business, religious institution, NGOs and other project relevant external stakeholders. The Project affected people (PAP) and stakeholders may participate throughout the project cycle via provided media and means of participation such as grievance redress mechanism and regular monitoring surveys/studies that will be carried out by the Project team. 29 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Table 5-1 Stakeholder Engagement Programs Key Issue/ Communication PIC / Responsible Objective Stakeholders Timeframe Location Notes Discussion Topic Strategy Party A. Current Design Process Site and design Alternative location and design, Consultation and one- Tu’a Golo, Head of Village, Head During Pre- Sano Nggoang Sub- PMU safeguards References of selection including: on-one meeting of Sub-district Construction district, Wae Sano team, SMT team, discussion topic:  Well pad locations which were Phase Village Anthropologist  ESIA Project identified culturally sensitivity expert or Description per 22 area safeguards December 2017  Coordination with the Task consultant (if (Section 3) Force Unit for Forest needed)  Preliminary Management of West (Abbreviated) Manggarai Regency to confirm LARAP proposed forest status of the proposed engagement well pads location (Section 4.9.2)  The use of lake water during exploration drilling Consultation on the Result study from ESIA and UKL- Public consultation, Affected communities, village Minimum one time Sano Nggoang Sub- PMU safeguards Proposed measures proposed environment UPL, and the proposed ESMP FGD, website leaders, Tu’a Golo, government after UKL- district, Wae Sano team, SMT, refers to the Appendix and social management agencies, NGOs, contractors, UPL/ESHIA study Village Exploration Site K ESMP of the ESIA plan (ESMP) subcontractors completed Team (EST) – Community Liaison, and E&S Consultant B. Land Acquisition Process Identification of land Land tenure system Consultation and one- Regional Land Acquisition As early as Sano Nggoang Sub- PMU safeguards Details proposed tenure and status on-one meeting Committee or Team (LAT), possible; district, Wae Sano team – land approach and Customary head (Tu’a Golo), Head intensive Village acquisition, discussion topic refers of Village, Head of Sub-district, and meeting before Exploration Site to Preliminary land owners land acquisition Team (EST) – (Abbreviated) LARAP process Community Liaison, (Section 4.9.2). MEMR Approval from land Agreed of the measurement of Consultation and one- Tu’a Golo, Land owners, head of Pre-construction Wae Sano Village PMU safeguards As above owners land boundaries and calculation on-one meeting villages phase, after the (Nunang, Lempe, team – land of land assets. land boundaries Taal, Dasak sub- acquisition, Ensure that the land is private measurement is villages) Exploration Site 30 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Key Issue/ Communication PIC / Responsible Objective Stakeholders Timeframe Location Notes Discussion Topic Strategy Party property and they are not completed. Team (EST) – culturally sensitive area for local Community Liaison, community. MEMR Land acquisition Land acquisition scheme Consultation, FGD Regional LAT (e.g. BPN, Pre-construction Sano Nggoang Sub- PMU safeguards As above process, either through (including seeking agreement on Provincial/Regency Government phase district team – land land lease or purchase land lease mechanism), eligibility, Unit in charge of land affairs, acquisition, compensation and cut-off date village and sub-district government Exploration Site village), Tu’a Golo, land owners Team (EST) – and land users (if any), including Community Liaison, vulnerable groups MEMR Provision of livelihood Consultation with the vulnerable Community Land owners and land users (if Pre-construction Sano Nggoang Sub- PMU safeguards As above restoration assistance and significantly people to identify engagement any), including vulnerable groups to construction district, Wae Sano team, SMT, for vulnerable and appropriate livelihood program stage of the Village Exploration Site significantly affected exploration Team (EST) – people facilities Community Liaison Road widening/ upgrade  Coordination for road widening Consultation and one-  Coordination with the National Pre-construction Sano Nggoang Sub- PMU safeguards As above and upgrade plan on-one meeting Road Management Unit (Balai phase district, West team – land  Coordination with related Pelaksanaan Jalan Nasional) in Manggarai Regency acquisition and government institutions on Kupang and/or Regional SMT, MEMR impacts on quality of public Planning Agency for road road and community access, upgrade on Trans Flores road prior to the road upgrades  Coordinate with the local process to ensure alignment government agency e.g. Local with regional development Road Office Agency (Dinas Bina planning and future road Marga), and the Sano Nggoang maintenance Sub-district Head for road upgrade on Sub-district road Land acquisition  Impacts to loss of agricultural Consultation through  PAP and their households Pre-construction Wae Sano Village SMT and Proposed measures impacts land one-on-one meeting  Local village government and phase Exploration Site refers to:  Disturbance to community and implementation of community figures Team (EST) –  Section 5.2 of this livelihood and income grievance mechanism Community Liaison SEP  Land disputes  Appendix K ESMP of the ESIA 31 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Key Issue/ Communication PIC / Responsible Objective Stakeholders Timeframe Location Notes Discussion Topic Strategy Party C. Pre-Construction Phase – Land Preparation Local recruitment and  Disclosure information on local Public consultation, Sub-district and village government Before Sano Nggoang Sub- PMU Team – HR As above suppliers opportunities recruitment process, FGD per-topics and/or level, Tu’a Golo, land owners, construction district and Wae Sano and procurement and potential adverse opportunity for local supplier per-community groups youth, local suppliers, local phase Village site based, SMT, impacts of the presence access and project information contractor, women and vulnerable Exploration Site of non-locals workers related to workers’ and groups Team (EST) – and increase in- supplier opportunities Community Liaison migrants seeking for  Community development/ business opportunities empowerment plan for from the Project potential local business partners through (a) Consultation with the local business to identify need and potencies for development; and (b) Implement a series of training sessions targeted at improving community capacity to provide materials and services required by the Project Impacts on Cultural  Disturbance to Local Cultural Consultation through  Consultation with cultural Consultation Sano Nggoang Sub- PMU Safeguards As above Heritage Values, Norms, and Practices, one-on-one meeting leaders and family clan owners should start district and Wae Sano Team, SMT, and Changes in Community of the affected land area early prior to Village Exploration Site Perception  Further consultations and land acquisition Team (EST) –  Impacts on local heritage coordination with regional process Community Liaison sites/objects with historical cultural agency and local cultural value, including university compang, nekara, land, lake, and water resources  Consultation regarding the process to relocate any cultural objects identified within the proposed Project facilities locations 32 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Key Issue/ Communication PIC / Responsible Objective Stakeholders Timeframe Location Notes Discussion Topic Strategy Party D. Construction Phase Public awareness about  General project schedule, Milestones Local government, village Regularly from West Manggarai PMU safeguards As above Project progress advance, and milestones Announcement through leaders, affected communities commencement Regency, Sano team environmental achievement. fact sheet, internet, (incl. women and vulnerable of project Nggoang Sub-district, and social, SMT,  Project’s commitment to newsletters, social group of people), environment al activities until Wae Sano Village Exploration Site environmental and social media, posters at and social NGOs, academics, construction Team (EST) – management and monitoring. village and/or sub- Media completion Community Liaison district office Ecotourism Development of local ecotourism Consultation, FGD Local village government, Tu’a Regularly from Sano Nggoang Sub- PMU Safeguards As above development by involving the existing Wae Golo, local business in commencement district, Wae Sano Team, SMT, Sano local tourism group ecotourism such as homestay of project Village Exploration Site owner activities until Team (EST) – operation phase Community Liaison Dust emissions impacts,  Consultation regarding Public consultation and Project affected community, local Prior and during Sano Nggoang Sub- PMU Safeguards As above temporary noise measures of dust and noise implementation of village government and construction district, Wae Sano Team, SMT, disturbance, and H2S impacts and the Project grievance mechanism community figures phase Village Exploration Site exposure and impacts measures to mitigate/reduce Team (EST) – to community health to  Consultation regarding to ERP Community Liaison community health and evacuation drill of nearby community for potential H2S exposure Safety risk of road users Safety awareness campaign Public consultation and Project affected community, local Prior and during Sano Nggoang Sub- PMU Safeguards As above and community residing program for local communities implementation of village government and construction district, Wae Sano Team, SMT, along the access road grievance mechanism community figures phase Village Exploration Site Team (EST) – Community Liaison E. Operation Phase Maintain good Project operation and its Face to Face meeting, National and local government, Regularly and as Sano Nggoang Sub- PMU Safeguards As above Relationship with contribution to local and regional multi stakeholder village leaders, Affected Required from district, Wae Sano Team and SMT, Project key external development Project continuous meetings/briefings, communities (incl. women and commencement Village Exploration Site stakeholders and commitment to protecting FGD vulnerable group of people), of project Team (EST) – develop feeling of environment and contribute to NGOs activities Community Liaison ownership of the project local economic development 33 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Key Issue/ Communication PIC / Responsible Objective Stakeholders Timeframe Location Notes Discussion Topic Strategy Party among communities Support Socio- Continuous contribution Face to Face meeting, Local government, Regularly from Sano Nggoang Sub- PMU Safeguards As above economic and and support to local socio- culture multi stakeholder Village leaders, youth, commencement district, Wae Sano Team SMT, community development and meetings/briefings, Affected communities of project Village Exploration Site programs economic development FGD (incl. women and vulnerable activities Team (EST) – group of people) Community Liaison The impacts Project related Face to Face meeting, PAP, particularly those identified Regularly from Wae Sano Village PMU Safeguards As above of the Project on programs on multi stakeholder as vulnerable households commencement Team SMT, vulnerable affected vulnerable meetings/briefings, of project Exploration Site households households FGD activities Team (EST) – are monitored Community Liaison Maintain strong positive Project operation and its Face to Face National and Regularly from Sano Nggoang Sub- PMU Safeguards As above Relationship with contribution meeting, multi Local government, commencement district, Wae Sano Team SMT, stakeholders to local and regional stakeholder Village leaders, of project Village Exploration Site development. meetings/briefings, Affected communities (incl. activities Team (EST) – Post-operation plan women And vulnerable group of Community Liaison Project continuous people), environmental and social Commitment to protecting NGOs environment During operation and Post operation. Support socio Continuous progress El Face to Face Local government, village Regularly from Sano Nggoang Sub- PMU Safeguards As above development Program report on community meeting, multi leaders, affected communities commencement district, Wae Sano Team SMT, toward community development through progress stakeholder (incl. women And vulnerable of project Village Exploration Site sustainable measures and readiness for meetings/briefings, group of people), business, activities Team (EST) – development sustainable development FGD media Community Liaison Community Project CSR program Community Local government, village Regularly from Wae Sano Village PMU Safeguards As above Development through participation, leaders, Affected communities commencement Team SMT, Project’s environmental public consultation, and (incl. women and vulnerable of project Exploration Site and social programs public awareness group of people) activities Team (EST) – through fact sheet, Community Liaison newsletters, conferences, 34 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Key Issue/ Communication PIC / Responsible Objective Stakeholders Timeframe Location Notes Discussion Topic Strategy Party sustainability report F. Closure Phase Managing stakeholder Project post-operation/ Community Perception Local government, village Annually from Sano Nggoang Sub- PMU Safeguards As above Expectations during decommissioning plan Survey, leaders, Affected communities commencement district, Wae Sano Team SMT, project operation and Sustainability Repot, (incl. women and vulnerable of Project Village Exploration Site post operation /project Grievance Redress group of people), environmental activities Team (EST) – closure Mechanism and social NGOs Community Liaison Throughout Exploration Stage Disturbance to Local On-going stakeholder Consultation through Project affected community (incl. Throughout West Manggarai PMU Safeguards As above Cultural Values, Norms, engagement and consultation not one-on-one meeting women and vulnerable exploration Regency, Sano Team SMT, and Practices, and only at macro/regional level with and implementation of group of people), NGOs, local phase Nggoang Sub-district, Exploration Site Changes in Community the government, but also at local grievance mechanism village, district, and regency Wae Sano Village Team (EST) – Perception level with the cultural groups and government and community Community Liaison the local community figures Managing stakeholder  Recruitment for Project Community Perception Local government, village Annually from Sano Nggoang Sub- PMU Safeguards As above concern and Operation Survey, Sustainability leaders, Affected communities commencement district, Wae Sano Team and SMT, expectation with  Business opportunities during Report, Grievance (incl. women and vulnerable of project Village Exploration Site accurate information Operation Phase Redress Mechanism group of people), NGOs activities Team (EST) – (identified in Section 3)  Adequate disclosure of Community Liaison information regarding the Project operational plan and ESMP which will be implemented during operation phase Community Dissemination of Grievance Consultation, FGD Project affected community (incl. Throughout West Manggarai PMU Safeguards As above participation Redress Mechanism (GRM) women and vulnerable group of exploration Regency, Sano Team SMT, in Project people), NGOs, local village, phase Nggoang Sub-district, Exploration Site development district, and regency government Wae Sano Village Team (EST) – and community figures Community Liaison 35 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 5.2 Degree/Level of Engagement Engaging in an appropriate way and communicating adequately is fundamental for a good relationship. In order to sufficiently meet the needs of the varied stakeholders the Project has developed engagement methods tailored according to the needs of the targeted groups. The Stakeholder level of dialogue is measured by two factors, namely: (1) the intensity of the dialogue between the stakeholders and the Project, which ranges from privileged relationship / active partnership on the one hand to limited contact at the other; and (2) the level of stance starting from the level of engagement, at a varying degree: partnership, participation, consultation and development. Stakeholder engagement degree for each of the identified stakeholder at regular basis throughout the Project exploration phase is proposed in the following table. The recommendation is based on the result of stakeholder analysis (see Section 4.4). Table 5-2 Degree/Level of Regular Stakeholder Engagement Type of Engagement Form of No Stakeholders Dialogue level Related Issues Stakeholders Period engagement 1 Project Affected Community Participation and Related issues to Monthly and Open dialogue, People proactive environment, social, as required participatory, consultation health, employment opportunities etc. 2 Tu’a Golo (Lempe, Customary Consultation and Related to project activity Monthly Open dialogue Taal, Dasak, institution inform Nunang Sub- villages) 3 Youth and Women Village-based Participation Related to employment Monthly Open dialogue Group, and other organisation opportunities FGD village organisation 4 Land owners Community Participation and Related issues to land Monthly and Informed consent, (PAP) and their proactive acquisition, compensation as required open dialogue, households consultation and livelihood impact 5 Women and other Community Participation and Related to livelihood Monthly and Consultation, FGD vulnerable groups proactive improvement and as required for livelihood consultation employment opportunities improvement 6 Head of Wae Sano Government Consultation and Related to project activity Monthly Open dialogue Village inform 7 Head of Sano Government Consultation Related to project activity Monthly Open dialogue Nggoang Village 8 Head of Pulau Government Consultation Related to project activity Monthly Open dialogue Nuncung Village 9 Camat (Head of Government Consultation and Related to project activity Monthly Open dialogue Sano Nggoang inform and influx issue Sub-district) 10 Pol PP Sano Government Inform Related to project Six-monthly Open dialogue Nggoang Sub- development district 11 West Manggarai Government Consultation and Related to project Quarterly Open dialogue Regent with his inform development and regional work team (SKPD) planning 12 Ministry of Mineral Government Partnership Related to project As required Open dialogue, and Energy proponent and project consultation Resources development 13 Environmental Government Consultation and Related to E&S permitting Quarterly Open dialogue, bi Office of West inform and monitoring annually E&S Manggarai monitoring report Regency 14 Forestry Office of Government Partnership Related to land use Quarterly Open dialogue, 36 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Type of Engagement Form of No Stakeholders Dialogue level Related Issues Stakeholders Period engagement West Manggarai permitting forestry land use 15 Cultural & Tourism Government Partnership and Related to tourism impact Quarterly Open dialogue, Office West development and development in Wae CSR and regional Manggarai Sano development Regency 16 Religious leader Community Partnership and Related to project Monthly Open dialogue, i.e. Pastor consultation development and partnership and stakeholder engagement consultation for CSR 17 Bird Life Indonesia NGOs Partnership and Related to tourism impact Quarterly Open dialogue, (Yayasan Burung consultation and development in Wae partnership and Indonesia) Sano Village consultation for CSR 18 Homestay owners Private Partnership Related to tourism and Monthly Open dialogue business business FGD 19 Local contractors Private Proactive Related to HSE and labour As required Information on business information right & issues compliance and labour right including project workers internal audit 5.3 Stakeholder Engagement Program Generally throughout the Project phase including the future exploitation, the following stakeholder engagement program can be used to maintain good relation with stakeholders while ensuring their involvement in the Project decision making process which may affect them:  Disclosure of information program;  Communication and engagement strategy; and  Consultation with women and other vulnerable groups. 5.3.1 Disclosure of Information The following project aspects, issues and activities are the information that is required to being disclosed to relevant stakeholders and affected communities:  Land acquisition process;  Environmental and social impacts and mitigation action plan;  Project activities, timing, progress/milestones and employment opportunities;  Emergency response plan and related community health and safety impact management; and  Environmental and social responsibility programs. Disclosure process will be conducted in informal event, involving local government to facilitate the discussion. Due to generally limited education level of the affected community, information disclosure will use a mix Bahasa Indonesia and local language to ensure the right information received by local community. 5.3.2 Communications and Engagement Strategy In order to provide a foundation for a cooperative relationship with the identified stakeholders, PT SMI, in line with its communication strategy, strives to achieve constructive communication in order to: 37 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002  Reaffirm the relationship of trust and understanding between the company and the local community;  Foster relationship of trust and understanding between the company management and local government;  Relieve any tensions between the company and the local community;  Anticipate and counteract at misrepresenting the Company’s activities;  Promote the contribution of the Company towards an improved living standard in the Project area;  Alleviate concerns related to the introduction of new processes and equipment through facts and evidence-based argument; and  Improve internal Company communication and thereby increase efficiency of the work process as a whole. A number of methods/tools will be employed for stakeholder engagement to consult with each of the identified key stakeholder groups, such as listed below.  Face to face discussions;  Public meetings/open house community forums;  Formal closed-door meetings;  Informal information;  Flyers and public notices;  Formal correspondence; and  Media reports/announcements. 5.3.3 Consultation with Women and Vulnerable People If impacted stakeholders, particularly women and vulnerable populations, are not explicitly recognized and prioritized during stakeholder identification and mapping activities then stakeholder engagement activities risk prioritizing those actors or groups with the most power or influence. If uninfluential yet severally impacted stakeholders are overlooked they may not be factored into engagement strategies and some adverse impacts may not be avoided or addressed through engagement activities. The Project has included women and vulnerable groups as stakeholders that need to be engaged and has some specific strategies on consultation and engagement activities including:  To ensure representation of varied views during the public consultation sessions, include consideration of participant’s age, gender, and vulnerability and/or minority group status;  Consultation to be undertaken in a manner that is appropriate and comfortable for the vulnerable groups to convey their concern such as: use the local language when consulting with native locals with limited Bahasa Indonesia skill; separate consultation with women; have sessions led by a woman; or undertake consultation at home for the elderly who are limited in their ability to attend sessions far from their residence; and  Clear mechanisms for responding to people’s concerns and suggestions to be disclosed during the consultation. As mentioned earlier in this document, the Project has involved women participation including from women empowerment group in the first and second round of public participation, however to increase women’s and vulnerable group’s awareness and to obtain perspective, the Project may need to conduct separate engagement of group consultation meeting. 38 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 6. Grievance Mechanism Referring to the GEUDP ESMF, a Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) is proposed for the Project to serve as an effective tool for early identification, assessment, and resolution of complaints on stakeholder engagement issues. If the GRM is properly implemented, affected members of the public, stakeholders, local communities or individuals, and PAPs will be able to file complaints and receive satisfying responses in a timely manner. The system will record and consolidate complaints and their follow -ups. This system will be designed for handling complaints of any other issues including environmental and other social safeguard issues, as well as for LARAP. In addition, the GRM should provide for fair, transparent and timely redress of grievances for all stakeholder groups, both men and women, youth, elderly, minority, and other groups within the affected community, to convey their grievances. GRM process for the Project is presented in the following Figure 6-1. Figure 6-1 Grievance Redress Mechanism 6.1 Step 1: Access Point / Complaint Uptake Step 1 of the GRM involved the following activities: 1. An easily accessible and well publicized focal point or user -facing ‘help desk’ will be set up within PT SMI and with each drilling Contractor; 2. Uptake channels will include email, SMS, webpage, and face -to-face conversation. The uptake channels will be publicized and advertised via local media and via the Contractor; 3. Staff members who receive complaints verbally will immediately put them in writing to be considered. Many complaints may be resolved ‘on the spot’ and informally by the Contractor or Site Management Team (SMT) 39 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Safeguards staff. Resolutions should be logged to (i) encourage responsiveness; and (ii) ensure that repeated or low-level grievances are being noted in the system; 4. The Contractor’s GRM system will be coordinated with the project GRM so that all complaints are captured within the PT SMI GRM system; 5. The GRM will have the ability to handle anonymous complaints; 6. The complainant will be provided with a receipt and ‘roadmap’ telling him/her how the complaint process works and when to expect further information. 6.2 Step 2: Grievance Log Proper grievance storage is a key for grievance resolution status tracking, include the following activities: 1. All complaints will be logged in writing and maintained in a simple database; 2. Complaints received will be assigned a number that will help the complainant track progress via the database; 3. Complainants will be handed a receipt and a flyer that describes the GRM procedures and timeline (staff should be trained to read this orally for illiterate complainants); 4. Where possible, the grievance log will capture complaints being made via informal or traditional systems, such as village councils or elders; 5. This will often require training local people and putting in place a formal link between the traditional systems and the GEUDP GRM (this could take the form of a verbal agreement or a written MoU); 6. At a minimum, the database will track and report publicly the complaints received, complaints resolved and the complaints that have gone to mediation. The database will also show the issues raised and location of complaints circle around. 6.3 Step 3: Assessment, Acknowledgment, and Response Initial steps in identifying appropriate resolution for each of the received grievance are as follow: 1. Eligibility will be a procedural step to ensure that the issue being raised is relevant to the project; 2. Complaints that cannot be resolved on the spot will be directed to the grievance focal point within the Project Management Unit (PMU )Safeguards team who will have 5 working days to assess the issue and provide a written response to the complainant, acknowledging receipt and detailing the next steps it will take; 3. Grievances will be categorized according to the type of issue raised and the effect on the environment/claimant if the impacts raised in the complaint were to occur. Based on this categorization, the complaint will be prioritized based on risk and assigned for appropriate follow up; 4. Assessment of the issue will consider the following: a) It is anticipated that the majority of issues raised during the sub-project preparation will be informational in nature or feedback that requires small course corrections; these should generally be handled by the SMT, however during the infrastructure and drilling operations, the majority of complaints will be the responsibility of the Contractor. b) Complaints that constitute a higher-risk issue for the project should be overseen by the Exploration Project Manager (EPM). 40 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 c) If an issue is already being handled, for example by a local court or mediation body, or within the World Bank, then the issue will be excluded from the grievance redress process in order to avoid duplication and confusion on the part of the complainant. 5. Resolution: Once the above issues have been considered, the complainant will be offered option(s) for resolution of their issue. The option offered is likely to fall into one of the following three categories: a) The complaint falls under the mandate of SMT or the Contractor and resolution can be offered immediately according to the request made by the complainant. The response will describe how and when resolution will be provided by the client and the name and contact information of the staff member responsible for it. b) The complaint falls under the mandate of EPM, Exploration Management Team (EMT), SMT or the Contractor but various options for resolution can be considered and/or extraordinary resources are required. The focal point will invite the complainant to a meeting to discuss these options. c) The complaint does not fall or only partially falls under the mandate of PMU. The focal point will indicate that the complaint has been referred to the appropriate body, which will continue communications with the complainant. 6.4 Step 4: Appeals Where an agreement has not been reached, the complainant will be offered an appeals process. This will be through the national courts, unless the complainant requests facilitation or mediation via a third party. 1. If the complainant accepts the option, and an agreement is reached, implementation will be monitored by the independent monitoring agency and a memo will be signed signalling the complaint has been resolved. 2. If the complainant does not accept these options or if he/she does but an agreement is not reached, the case will be closed. The complainant may seek redress through courts or other mechanisms available at the country level. 6.5 Step 5: Resolve and Follow-Up Grievance resolution and closure mechanism include the following steps: 1. Where there is an agreement between the complainant and PMU or Contractor on how the complaint will be resolved, a memo will be drafted and signed by both parties. After due implementation of it, a new memo will be signed stating that the complaint has been resolved; 2. All supporting documents of meetings needed to achieve resolution will be part of the file related to the complaint. This will include meetings that have been escalated to an appeals level or are handled by a third party; 3. PMU Safeguards Team will provide quarterly reports to the public that track the complaints received, resolved, not resolved, and referred to a third party. The World Bank project team will receive either the raw grievance data or the quarterly reports, in order to support the PMU in early identification of developing risks; 4. The GRM data will be available to feed into World Bank reports to demonstrate responsiveness and early resolution of issues (and help Bank teams identify outstanding complaints in need of attention). 6.6 Timeline for Implementation SMI has committed for implementation of the on-site based grievance mechanism to be initiated align with the commencement of the Project pre-construction activities (details are presented in the ESIA Section 3). For the moment, grievances may be submitted / communicated to PT SMI at the following postal address and phone number, see Table 6-1. 41 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Table 6-1 PT SMI Postal Address PT SARANA MULTI INFRASTRUKTUR (Persero) Address: Sahid Sudirman Center 47th -48th Floor Jl. Jend. Sudirman No. 86, Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10220, Indonesia Tel: (+62 21) 8082 5288 / Fax. (021) 8082 5258 Email: eksplorasipanasbumiWae Sano@gmail.com At the time this report was developed the formal grievance mechanism has not yet been established or disbursed to the community. The general flow of the GRM to be implemented by the Project is proposed, as presented on Figure 6-1. 42 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 7. Organisational Arrangement, Roles and Responsibilities As stated in SMI GEUDP ESMF, the stakeholder engagement process is managed by Project Management Unit (PMU) and supported by the PMU Safeguards team, Exploration Site Team (EST) and field staff i.e. Community Liaison. Other sections or departments such as Legal, Project, Drilling, Supply Chain Management, Contract, Accounting, and Human Resource (HR) will be included on a need basis. The team will be monitored by the PMU Manager. Specifically for the Wae Sano Geothermal Exploration Project, the organisational structure of the on -site based team is presented in the figure below. Source: (PT SMI (Persero), 2017) Figure 7-1 Exploration Site Team Responsibilities of for the implementation of this SEP are spread across from PMU to EST, include but are not restricted to the following (details see Table 7-1):  Disseminate Project information;  Provide timely communication to stakeholders and key stakeholders;  Create news releases, information and presentation materials;  Develop and maintain interactions with stakeholder groups;  Involvement in joint projects; and  Liaise with the local government, community, and other strategic stakeholders. 43 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Table 7-1 Roles and Responsibilities of PT. SMI Position Role and Responsible PMU Manager  Coordinate, communicate and monitor implementation of the stakeholder engagement programs with the Site Support Manager.  Manage and monitor the local stakeholders’ behaviours toward the Project activity.  Identify the local stakeholders’ potential risk and impact/problems due to project activity  Communicate all major grievances to management  Assist EST Safeguards Team and PMU Safeguards Team to investigate incidents and complaints, and resolve issues.  Ensure the consultation plan conducted and use of public consultation tools with local government and residents living around the geothermal field location so that all information will be passed through and to minimalize the potential of resident’s rejection towards the geothermal energy upstream development project. PMU Safeguards Team  Developing and maintaining relationships with key community groups, government officials, media and the public in general.  Develop and proposes strategic stakeholders engagement.  Manage grievance redress mechanism, including coordination with Contractors’ GRM, EST grievance redress activities and PT SMI Corporate GRM system. Follow up and close out incidents, complaints and non-conformances.  Plan, propose and implement community development and social programs in accordance with the Work Plan & Budget and the objectives and policy of the company.  Monitor the implementation and progress of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) programs at the site and provide consultation where necessary.  Develop and supervise updates to the stakeholder database.  Report SEP implementation to Senior Manager Exploration Site Team (EST)  Provide technical training to Contractors on GRM, complaints management, community engagement and other aspects of environmental and social impact mitigation where necessary, or recruit consultants to perform training.  Manage local stakeholder engagement and community liaison and respond to complaints and grievances.  Environmental and social monitoring. Community Liaison  Assist in the development of stakeholder engagement program and activities  Implement stakeholder engagement program and activities with the direct referrals from PMU Safeguards Team  Record and document stakeholder engagement activities  Prepare regular reports on stakeholder engagement activities  Record and document stakeholder grievances in the grievance mechanism log  Implement the roles as secretary of the GRM  With guidance from PMU Safeguards Team develop and maintain stakeholders’ database and commitment register. 44 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 8. Monitoring and Reporting 8.1 Monitoring and Evaluation Monitoring of the stakeholder engagement process is still new to the Project. A process of establishing monitoring scheme is the initial phases of development. The results of monitoring and evaluation will provide a basis for planning better initiatives for the operation, closure and rehabilitation project stages. The following SEP activities require monitoring and evaluation from assigned personnel and teams in the Project:  Implementation of the SEP requires regular updates of the stakeholder database and issues, as well as documentation of stakeholder engagement activities. Throughout the project life the Project will maintain communication channels with relevant stakeholders as identified. Requirements for SEP update is provided in the Section 8.3;  Evaluation is essential to provide feedback to improve the Project SEP and enhance the Project- stakeholder relationship; and  Implementation of the GRM as part of the SEP which includes dissemination of the grievance mechanism process, receiving grievance through accessible channel for all community groups, adequate storage system, and resolution process requires identification for an effective way of grievance management and tracking of number of grievances resolved. Regular monitoring and evaluation of the SEP implementation will be carried out bi-annually throughout the Project exploration stage. This is aligned with the proposed monitoring plan observed in the Appendix K ESMP, attached to the ESIA. 8.2 Reporting Stakeholder engagement activities, stakeholder’s concerns, environmental and social issues will be continuously reported in an integrated stakeholder and grievances database system. The SEP reporting to include and enable:  Documentation of all consultation activities have been undertaken into an integrated stakeholder and grievances database system as basis for regular monitoring. Any feedback related to the Project design and process will be channelled to the engineering team and contractors for improvement;  Reviews of appropriateness and effectiveness of methods used in engaging with stakeholders i.e. evaluation of the achievement of SEP objectives and the planned engagement (as recommended in the Section 5); and  Relevant information which may affect larger community shall be disclosed in a transparent way through public domain documents and websites such as sustainability report, annual report, newsletters, articles, local media, UKL-UPL implementation monitoring report, and other outreach tools. 8.3 Requirements for SEP Update The SEP is a living document which will be regularly updated following the Project development and changes in local social structure and stakeholders dynamic. These include:  At the end of exploration stage, as the Project entering planning phase for exploitation, an update on this SEP is required as different or new potential issues may arise in relation to the potential exploitation impacts to the environment and surrounding community, follow by higher expectation on the Project benefit; and  Changes in the local social structure and stakeholders’ dynamic may occur due to e.g. changes in population with the increase in-migration and potential changes in local customs and habits following industrial activities in the village. 45 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 According to the latest Project schedule dated March 2018, well exploration stage will commence in end of 2018 up to mid-2020. Thereby, the next SEP update is suggested to be initiated in early 2020. 46 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Appendix A Pre-Socialization Report 47 Laporan Kegiatan Pra-Sosialisasi Labuan Bajo, 15 September 2016 Divisi Pengembangan Proyek dan Advisory 3 LAPORAN KEGIATAN PT SARANA MULTI INFRASTRUKTUR (PERSERO) Tanggal : 15 September 2016 Waktu : 15.00 – 18.00 Kegiatan : Pra-Sosialisasi Publik Lokasi : Hotel Bintang Flores, Labuan Bajo, Nusa Tenggara Timur Agenda Sosialisasi rencana kegiatan eksplorasi panas bumi di Wae Sano Nusa Tenggara Timur Peserta Institusi Peserta PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur 1. Divisi Pengembangan Proyek dan (Persero) Advisory: - Andy Budiman, - Rizka Amorini - Adyaksa Paripurna, - Dewi Agustiani 2. Divisi Management Risiko - Sunu Tantra World Bank Bp. Jeffry 1. Bupati Manggarai Barat Pemerintah Daerah 2. Wakil Bupati 3. Sekda 4. Asisten II 5. Kadis Pertambangan dan Energi 6. Ka BPM dan Perizinan Terpadu 7. Kadis Pariwisata 8. Ka BAPPEDA 9. Kadis PU 10. Sekretaris Distamben 11. Ekonomi Setda Kab.Mabar 12. Kabid Geologi Distamben 13. Sekretaris BAPPEDA 14. Kabid Pengawasan BLH 15. Kabid Perizinan pada bid. Energi dan Migas 16. Kabid Energi Minyak dan Gas Distamben 17. Sekretaris Dinas Kehutanan 18. Kabid Pengawasan Distamben 1 19. Kabag Tata Pemerintahan Sekda 20. Kakan Badan Pertanahan Nasional Kab. Mabar 21. Kabid Bina Marga Dinas PU 22. Ka. PLN Manggarai Barat 23. Kasi. Potensi Tambang pada Bid. Geologi Perwakilan masyarakat 50 orang perwakilan masyarakat kecamatan Sano Nggoang yang terdiri dari: 1. Camat 2. Wakil Camat 3. Tokoh Masyarakat 4. Tokoh Adat 5. Tokoh Agama 6. Tokoh Pemuda 7. LSM: - GERAM - Yakines - Burung Indonesia - Baku Peduli - Swiscontact - WWF Perwakilan Kementerian ESDM 1. Direktorat Panas Bumi: - Bp. Eddy Hindiarto Judoadi - Bp. Agus Sudiaman 2. Badan Geologi: - Bp. Nur hadi Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Kegiatan pra-sosialisasi publik dilaksanakan untuk memberikan pemahaman awal kepada peserta kegiatan terkait pengembangan proyek panas bumi yang akan dilakukan oleh Pemerintah sekaligus sebagai sarana untuk mendapatkan masukan dari masyarakat terkait penyiapan kegiatan sosialisasi publik yang akan dilakukan pada tahap selanjutnya. Kegiatan pra-sosialisasi publik yang dilaksanakan pada Hari Kamis, 15 September 2016, pukul 15.00 dihadiri oleh Bupati dan Wakil Bupati Manggarai Barat, Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah, perwakilan tokoh masyarakat, tokoh agama, tokoh adat, tokoh pemuda, dan perwakilan lembaga swadaya masyarakat. Kegiatan juga turut dihadiri oleh perwakilan Kementerian ESDM dari Direktorat Panas Bumi dan Badan Geologi, PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) (“PT SMI), dan Bank Dunia. Kegiatan pra-sosialisasi diawali dengan sambutan pembukaan yang disampaikan oleh Bupati Manggarai Barat. Melalui sambutannya, Bupati Manggarai Barat menyampaikan dukungan atas kegiatan eksplorasi panas bumi yang dilakukan Pemerintah mengingat besarnya manfaat yang dapat ditimbulkan dari kegiatan tersebut bagi masyarakat. Oleh karena itu, untuk mendukung kegiatan tersebut, Bupati Manggarai Barat telah menerbitkan Keputusan Bupati 2 terkait pembentukan Tim Koordinasi yang di koordinasikan oleh Dinas Pertambangan dan beranggotakan SKPD terkait. Bupati Manggarai Barat juga turut mengajak seluruh peserta untuk ikut mendukung terlaksananya program Pemerintah tersebut. Kegiatan dilanjutkan dengan sesi presentasi oleh para panelis perwakilan dari Direktorat Panas Bumi dan Badan Geologi Kementerian ESDM, serta PT SMI. Sesi presentasi langsung dilanjutkan dengan sesi diskusi dan tanya jawab dengan seluru peserta dan ditutup dengan acara makan malam bersama. Pembahasan dan Hasil Pembahasan 1. Peserta :Yanche Taban Perwakilan : Badan Lingkungan Hidup Saran dan masukan yang diberikan: Agar kegiatan sosialisasi dapat memberikan kesempatan yang banyak kepada perwakilan tokoh masyarakat untuk mengutarakan pertanyaan. Pertanyaan dan jawaban: Apa tahapan selanjutnya yang akan dilakukan oleh PT SMI dalam waktu dekat terkait pengembangan proyek eksplroasi panas bumi di Wae Sano? Jawab: - Sebelumnya telah dilakukan pengeboran landaian suhu dan kegiatan surface survey yang dilakukan oleh tim Pusat Sumber Daya Mineral, Batu Bara, dan Panas Bumi. - Setelah surface survey selesai dilakukan, selanjutnya akan dilakukan penyusunan kajian lingkungan dan sosial. Penyusunan kajian lingkungan dan sosial akan dilakukan oleh konsultan yang akan bekerja dengan mengikuti standar pedoman lingkungan dan sosial World Bank yang cukup ketat untuk menghindari dampak yang ditimbulkan dari kegiatan yang akan dilakukan. 2. Peserta : Pater Perwakilan : Tokoh Agama Pertanyaan dan jawaban: a) Mohon dijelaskan sejelas-jelasnya apa saja dampak positif dan negatif dari pengembangan panas bumi di Wae Sano? Jawab: Dampak Positif dan Negatif serta langkah yang dapat dilakukan untuk memitigasi dampak negatif yang mungkin terjadi adalah: - Terdapat banyak dampak positif dari pengembangan panas bumi di suatu daerah. Selain dapat meningkatkan kapasitas listrik, pengembangan panas bumi juga dapat meningkatkan perputaran roda perokonomian karena 3 meningkatnya ketersediaan listrik, panas bumi juga dapat dimanfaatkan secara langsung oleh masyarakat misalnya saja untuk mengeringkan hasil perkebunan serta dapat pula meningkatkan jumlah penyerapan tenaga kerja dalam wilayah tersebut. - Dampak negatif yang dapat terjadi adalah peningkatan aktifitas disekitar lokasi, dapat terjadi peningkatan arus lalu lintas - Namun untuk meminimalisir terjadinya dampak negatif yang terjadi akan dilakukan kajian lingkungan dan sosial serta penyusunan UKL/UPL, dalam kajian tersebut akan diformulasikan informasi terkait social mapping. Untuk menghindari hal-hal yang merugikan masyarakat, Kementerian ESDM melalui Direktorat Panas Bumi akan melakukan pengawasan terhadap seluruh kegiatan panas bumi yang akan dilakukan, baik pada fase eksplorasi maupun eksploitasi. - Selain itu, akan dibentuk komite bersama yang terdiri atas Kementerian dan lembaga terkait yang juga bertugas dalam memformulasikan langkah-langkah yang akan ditempuh untuk kegiatan eksplorasi ini serta mengawasi kegiatan yang akan dilakukan. b) Bagaimana mengatasi dampak lingkungan terutama apabila terjadi bencana alam seperti yang terjadi di Lapindo? Jawab: Contoh dampak negatif dari proses eksplorasi atau pengeboran yang terjadi adalah Lapindo. Kegiatan pengeboran eksplorasi yang terjadi di Lapindo merupakan pengeboran di sektor migas yang memiliki kontur dan komposisi tanah dan batuan yang berbeda dengan sektor panas bumi. Pada sektor migas, kontur tanah dan batuan cenderung lebih lembek daripada sektor panas bumi yang memilik kontur tanah dan batuan yang keras karena umunya berasal dari magma. Kontur tanah dan batuan di wilayah sumber daya migas menyebabkan besarnya kemungkinan terjadi ledakan (blow out) seperti yang terjadi di Lapindo pada fase eksplorasi. Keadaan tersebut berbeda dengan eksplorasi panas bumi, karena wilayah potensi panas bumi umumnya memiliki kontur tanah dan batuan yang keras, maka sangat kecil kemungkinan terjadi ledakan seperti yang terjadi di Lapindo. Hal yang mungkin terjadi adalah adanya semburan air panas yang terjadi pada fase eksplorasi, namun semburan tersebut dapat dimitgasi dengan teknologi blow out preventer yang digunakan pada saat pengeboran eksplorasi dilakukan. c) Jelaskan bagaimana sistem ganti rugi tanah dilakukan dalam pengembangan proyek ini? Jawab: Proses ganti rugi tanah akan melibatkan SKPD serta badan-badan terkait. 4 3. Peserta : Bapak Simon Perwakilan : Tokoh masyarakat Desa Sano Nggoang Saran dan masukan yang diberikan : Bapak Simon merasa bahwa sebenarnya tidak ada dampak buruk dari kegiatan eskplorasi yang akan dilakukan bila seluruh tahapan dilakukan dengan baik.Tetapi karena pada dasarnya kegiatan eksplorasi panas bumi merupakan hal baru dan asing bagi masyarakat, maka masyarakat perlu dijelaskan secara detail terkait setiap tahapan yang akan dilalui agar tidak terjadi penolakan dari masyarakat. 4. Peserta : Bapak Pasaputra Perwakilan : Tokoh masyarakat Pulau Nuncung Saran dan masukan yang diberikan : a) Diharapkan agar dapat dijelaskan hal-hal terkait keadaan dan kontur tanah disekitar lokasi potensi panas bumi di Kecamatan Sano Nggoang. b) Dalam sesi presentasi konsultasi publik yang akan dilakukan nantinya, diharapkan agar dapat dijelaskan secara mendalam terkait dampak-dampak yang dapat terjadi dalam fase eksplorasi panas bumi kepada mayarakat. c) Peserta memberikan saran kepada Pemerintah Daerah melalui Bappeda agar membuat tata ruang lingkar danau secepatnya. Hal ini untuk mencegah terjadinya bentrokan aktivitas tata ruang antara dinas pariwisata dengan kegiatan pengembangan pembangkit listrik tenaga panas bumi pada wilayah tersebut, mengingat Danau Sano Nggoang telah ditetapkan sebagai kawasan wisata yang akan dikembangkan. 5. Peserta : Bapak Blaisius Perwakilan : Tokoh Masyarakat Desa Wae Sano Pertanyaan dan jawaban : a) Bagaimana jika proses lelang Wilayah Kerja Panas Bumi (WKP) yang dilakukan Pemerintah gagal atau tidak mendapatkan pemenang lelang, padahal sudah dilakukan eksplorasi panas bumi pada wilayah tersebut? Jawab : - Apabila proses lelang yang dilakukan pemerintah tidak mendapatkan pemenang lelang, maka secara Undang Undang, perusahaan yang melakukan eksplorasi memiliki kewajiban untuk menutup kembali sumur yang telah di bor. - Sebelum memberikan izin untuk melakukan kegiatan eksplorasi kepada perusahaan, Pemerintah mensyaratkan perusahaan untuk menyetorkan dana deposit sebesar 50% dari total biaya yang dibutuhkan untuk pelaksanaan eksplorasi. Dalam hal kegiatan eksplorasi tidak berhasil, maka Pemerintah akan 5 menggunakan dana deposit tersebut untuk menutup sumur dan memperbaiki lingkungan. b) Siapakah yang akan bertanggung jawab jika terjadi kerusakan pipa yang mengalirkan uap dari sumur panas bumi menuju pembangkit listrik? Jawab: Hal tersebut menjadi tanggung jawab perusahaan yang menjadi pengembang pembangkit listrik panas bumi pada lokasi tersebut. Masyarakat diharapkan untuk tidak khawatir akan hal tersebut karena seluruh kegiatan pengembangan dan pengeoperasian PLTP akan diawasi oleh Pemerintah. Dalam proyek pengembangan dan pengoperasian PLTP yang telah ada di beberapa daerah dapat dibuktikan bahwa keberadaan proyek tidak mengganggu masyarakat dan lingkungan, diantaranya sektor pertanian dan perkebunan di sekitar proyek tidak terganggu. c) Berapa luas lahan yang dibutuhkan untuk kegiatan eksplorasi panas bumi? Jawab: Untuk satu sumur dibutuhkan lebih kurang 2 hektar. d) Sebelumnya masyarakat mengetahui bahwa Pemerintah sudah pernah melakukan pengeboran panas bumi sebelumnya di daerah Kecamatan Sano Nggoang, mengapa sumur yang telah di bor tersebut saat ini tidak pernah dimanfaatkan atau dikelola lagi? Jawab: - Sumur bor di daerah Taal yang pernah di bor oleh Badan Geologi merupakan pengeboran landaian suhu saja. Pengeboran landaian suhu merupakan pengeboran kecil untuk mengetahui suhu di dalam bumi dan lubang bor tersebut hanya sebesar botol air mineral. Sumur tersebut saat ini sudah ditutup oleh semen yang kedap. Tidak dilakukan pengelolaan lebih lanjut pada sumur tersebut karena memang pada sumur tersebut tidak dapat dimanfaatkan untuk kegiatan lain dan hanya untuk mengambil data suhu saja. 6. Peserta : Bapak Ferry Perwakilan : Perwakilan LSM Geram Saran dan masukan yang diberikan : Agar kegiatan sosialisasi/konsultasi publik dilakukan lebih sering kepada masyarakat. Pertanyaan dan jawaban : 6 a) Kegiatan pengeboran eksplorasi tentunya akan membutuhkan banyak air, sementara warga kecamatan Sano Nggoang juga membutuhkan air untuk keperluan sehari-hari, bagaimana jika masyarakat menjadi kekurangan air karena kegiatan eksplorasi juga menggunakan sumber air yang sama dengan masyarakat? Jawab: Memang benar bahwa kegiatan eksplorasi panas bumi akan membutuhkan banyak air pada saat kegiatan pengeboran berlangsung. Namun sumber air yang digunakan bukan lah sumber air permukaan seperti yang digunakan oleh masyarakat untuk memenuhi kebutuhan sehari-hari melainkan air tanah pada kedalaman tertentu, sehingga tidak akan mengganggu penggunaan air milik masyarakat. b) Secara ekologis seberapa jauhkah radius area yang dapat terkena dampak dari kegiatan eksplorasi ini? Jawab: Perihal hal tersebut, baru dapat di informasikan setelah penentuan titik bor dilakukan dan konsultan lingkungan mulai melakukan proses pengambilan data dan penyusunan kajian lingkungan dan sosial. Hasil penyusunan kajian tersebut juga akan dipresentasikan pada konsultasi publik yang akan diselenggarakan nantinya yang melibatkan para konsultan dan masyarakat agar masyarakat dapat memahami secara mendalam terkait dampak yang dapat ditimbulkan dari kegiatan eksplorasi tersebut. 7. Peserta : Bapak Hendrikus Perwakilan : Tokoh Masyarakat Desa Wae Sano Pertanyaan dan jawaban : a) Mohon jelaskan lokasi titik-titik bor untuk eksplorasi? Jawab: Penetuan titik bor saat ini masih dalam tahap pembahasan lebih lanjut dan tentunya akan mempertimbangkan lokasi air, kawasan hutan, perkebunan masyarakat. b) Bagaimana jika air danau menjadi kering karena kegiatan eksplorasi? Jawab: Kegiatan eksplorasi tidak akan mempengaruhi jumlah air danau karena air danau hanya sedalam 600m sedangkan kedalaman titik bor mencapai 3000m dan tidak menggunakan air danau untuk kegiatan eksplorasi. Selain itu air danau bersifat asam dan korosif sehingga tidak dapat di gunakan untuk kegiatan eksplorasi. 7 c) Bagaimana jika suara bising dari kegiatan eksplorasi dapat memberikan dampak buruk yakni membuat burung-burung kabur dari habitatnya pada hutan disekitaran danau? Jawab: Dalam kajian dampak lingkungan dan sosial yang akan disusun oleh konsultan, akan dilakukan juga kajian terkait fauna burung yang tentunya untuk mengetahui dampak yang ditimbulkan dari kegiatan eksplorasi pada fauna burung disekitar lokasi dan bagaimana cara memitigasi dampak tersebut. 8. Peserta : Bapak Stef Perwakilan : Perwakilan Dinas Kehutanan Saran dan masukan yang diberikan: Agar rencana kegiatan eksplorasi dapat disampaikan kepada Dinas Kehutanan sehingga diketahui apakah titik-titik bor eksplorasi berada pada kawasan hutan atau tidak. Tanggapan panelis: Tentunya akan dilakukan koordinasi dengan Dinas Kehutanan. Karena ada izin-izin yang perlu diurus pada tingkat kabupaten terlebih dahulu. 9. Peserta : Bapak Fredi Perwakilan : Tokoh Masyarakat Desa Wae Sano Saran dan masukan yang diberikan : Dengan adanya kegiatan eksplorasi, bukan tidak mungkin harga tanah juga akan melonjak, makas sebaiknya pemerintah menetapkan regulasi harga tanah. Dokumentasi Bupati Manggarai Barat sedang memberikan sambutan pada kegiatan pra-sosialisai. 8 Peserta kegiatan pra-sosialisasi Kesimpulan - Pemerintah Daerah bersedia memberikan dukungan terkait pengembangan proyek eksplorasi panas bumi di Wae Sano yang dilakukan oleh Pemerintah. Salah satu bentuk dukungan yang telah dilakukan oleh Pemerintah Daerah adalah melalui pembentukan Tim Koordinasi yang beranggotakan SKPD terkait melalui penerbitan SK Bupati. - Melalui kegiatan pra-sosialisasi yang diselenggarakan, telah diterima masukan dan saran yang sangat bermanfaat dari seluruh peserta kegiatan sosialisasi yang akan menjadi catatan untuk penyelenggaran sosialisasi publik kedepannya. - Tokoh masyarakat berharap agar kegiatan sosialisasi kepada masyarakat dapat lebih sering dilakukan untuk terus memberikan pemahaman dan informasi terkait tahapan yang dilalui dalam proyek. Tindak Lanjut Kegiatan sosialisasi publik akan diselenggarakan sekitar akhir Oktober 2016 atau di bulan November 2016 di Kecamatan Sano Nggoang dengan mengundang seluruh masyarakat Desa Sano Nggoang dan Desa Wae Sano. 9 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Appendix B Public Consultation Q&A, Minutes Meeting, and Participatory Maps PreparedFor: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 48 First Round of Public Consultation Minutes of Meeting (3rd November 2016) LAPORAN KEGIATAN KONSULTASI PUBLIK STUDI LINGKUNGAN DAN SOSIAL RENCANA PEMBANGUNAN PEMBANGKIT LISTRIK TENAGA PANAS BUMI TANGGAL : 3 NOVEMBER 2016 TEMPAT : KANTOR DESA WAESANO KEC. SANO NGGOANG KAB. MANGGARAI BARAT PESERTA : 1. Kementrian ESDM, Direktorat Panas Bumi 2. PT. SMI 3. Kapolsek Lano 4. Danramil 5. Kepala Desa : Desa Waesano, Desa Sano Nggoang, Desa Pulau Nuncung 6. Masyarakat Desa Waesano 7. Masyarakat Desa Sano Nggoang 8. Masyarakat Desa Pulau Nuncung 9. Konsultan AECOM I. SAMBUTAN-SAMBUTAN 1. CAMAT SANO NGGOANG  Kami menyambut baik tentang rencana pembanguna pembangkit listrik tenaga panas bumi dan kami merasa senang karena pada hari ini semua dapat berkumpul dan dapat berdiskusi terkait rencana kegiatan dan membahas dampak positif maupun negative dari rencana kegiatan. 2. PT. SMI, Bapak Gangan  Kegiatan rencana pembangunan pembangkit listrik tenaga panas bumi di Sano Nggoang dilakukan ketika Kementrian ESDM melihat ada potensi di Sano Nggoang untuk energy listrik.  Kegiatan saat ini masih tahap awal baru berupa kajian untuk melihat apakah ada potensi untuk energy listrik di Sano Nggoang.  Pemerintah Indonesia sedang mencari dana untuk melakukan kajian potensi panas bumi di Sano Nggoang agar dapat dimanfaatkan untuk energy listrik.  Kegiatan konsultasi publik dilaksanakan agar masyarakat dapat memahami tentang rencana kegiatan yang akan dilaksanakan dan mendiskusikannya bersama. Sehingga dapat diambil keputusan bersama bagi tahap-tahap selanjutnya.  Juga mendiskusikan dan mengkaji dampak sosekbud dari rencana kegiatan yang akan dilaksanakan. 3. Kementrian ESDM, Direktorat Panas Bumi (Bpk Husin)  Pemerintah sedang melakukan kajian di wilayah-wilayah mana saja di Indoensia yang memiliki potensi energy panas bumi. Indonesia dengan kondisi geografisnya memiliki potensi dan energy sangat besar untuk dimanfaatkan bagi energy listrik.  Di wilayah-wilayah Urumbu, Pataloko sudah dilakukan kegiatan eksplorasi.  Diharapkan di Flores pasokan listrik dapat dimanfaatkan dari energy panas bumi seluruhnya.  Proses panas bumi dapat diibaratkan secara sederhana sebagai cerek, uap , dan tungku. Dimana cerek berisi air dan kompor atau tungku.  Di Sano Nggoang khususnya di Desa Waesano ada sumber air panas secara disederhanakan sebagai tutup cerek. Kegiatan eksplorasi yang akan dilaksanakan dengan melubangi tutup cerek,dimana yang akan diambil adalah uap airnya. Uap air akan memutar turbin dan akan menggerakan generator, sehingga dari generator ini akan dihasilkan listrik. Uap air akan diproses dan akan dimasukan kembali ke bumi.  Pembangkit listrik dengan menggunakan energy panas bumi sudah lama dilakukan. Di negara-negara lain sudah lama dikembangkan. Seperti di Itali sudah 100 tahun menyala terus. Begitu pula di Indonesia seperti di Jawa Barat ada Kawah Kamojang yang telah dijadikan sebagai energy panas bumi. Kawah Kamojang telah beroperasi selama 35 tahun. New Zealand sudah beroperasi 65 tahun.  Proses energy panas bumi selama dikelola dengan benar akan menghasilkan energy listrik secara maksimal. Air akan dipanaskan dan dikembalikan lagi ke dalam bumi.  Indonesia memiliki potensi energy panas bumi di 65 lokasi. Di Wae Sano telah dilaksanakan survei pendahuluan. PT. SMI yang akan menjadi penanggung jawab di Wae Sano.  Potensi panas bumi yang ada di Wae Sano diperkirakan dapat menghasilkan energy listrik 30 MW yang dapat mensuplai kebutuhan listrik di Kabupaten Manggarai Barat. Potensi 30 MW baru perkiraan, bisa lebih tinggi atau kurang. Harus dibuktikan dengan pengeboran.  Biaya yang akan dikeluarkan sekitar 1,25 – 3 juta dollar.  Direncanakan di Waesano akan dibangun 3 sumur eksplorasi. Apabila berhasil akan dilanjutkan. Apabila tidak brehasil rencana kegiatan tidak akan dilanjut atau dipindah ke lokasi lain.  Di Waesano akan dilakukan penghitungan ulang betul tidak ada potensi 30 MW ?  Tahapan kegiatan dilakukan pengeboran setelah itu pembangunan PLTP atau Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Panas Bumi. Direncakan akan dicoba dengan kapasitas 10 – 20 MW.  Pemerintah Indonesia akan melakukan pengeboran dan setelah ditemukan ada potensi akan ditawarkan ke pihak swasta untuk pembangunan power plant. Kalau sudah terbukt ada potensi sumber panas bumi, maka investor akan banyak berinvestasi di Flores.  Di sepanjang wilayah Pulau Flores dari barat ke timur, potensi panas bumi sangat besar. Di wilayah Flores – Alor akan tergantung untuk energy listrik ke panas bumi untuk melepaskan ketergantungan dari batu bara dan diesel. Batu bara memang murah tapi harus diambil dari pulau lain. Sementara diesel sangat mahal. Sehingga panas bumi dapat dijadikan alternative energy karena pemasangan pipa tidak akan mengganggu lingkungan dan akan sinergi dengan alam dan masyarakat.  Perusahaan melalui program Comdev/CSR akan membuat program pemberdayaan ekonomi, sosial dan pendidikan. Program yang dapat dilaksanakan seperti membangun sekolah dan gereja. Program akan disusun sesuai kebutuhan dan permintaan masyarakat. Program akan dilaksanakan secara bertahap dan dibahas antara perusahaan dengan masyarakat. Kementrian ESDM akan melakukan supervisi.  Pemanfaatan langsung energy panas bumi lainnya misalnya seperti untuk pengeringan hasil pertanian/perkebunan. Misalnya mengeringkan kopi, kopra, coklat. Kopi yang dikeringkan dengan panas bumi akan berkualitas lebih baik atau kualitas premium. Manfaat lain untuk mengolah air danau yang melimpah dimana kondisinya saat ini belum bisa dimanfaatkan karena terlalu asam dapat digunakan menjadi sumber air bersih bagi masyarakat. 4. PT. AECOM (Pak Agus)  Rencana yang akan dilaksanakan dengan mengkaji potensi yang ada melalui pengeboran. Diperkirakan potensi yang ada di sebelah timur Danau Sano Nggoang. Tepatnya di Desa Waesano dan Desa Sano Nggoang.  Dilakukan juga kajian terhadap kegiatan mobilisasi peralatan dilihat dari aspek lingkungan dan sosial (kajian kualitas air, udara, dan sosekbud).  Kegiatan kajian dilaksanakan dari tahap pra eksplorasi. Misalnya dengan memprakirakan dampak dari kegiatan mobilisasi alat dan material untuk kegiatan pengeboran. Kemudian akan dilakukan pengelolaan. Misalnya dengan perbaikan jalan di lokasi-lokasi tikungan dan pembangunan jembatan di titik-titik yang perlu diperlebar.  Tahapan kegiatan yang akan dilaksanakan sebagai berikut: 1) Pembebasan lahan 2) Konstruksi Pengeboran 3) Pemasangan pompa air 4) Pembangunan bak penampung 5) Eksplorasi, untuk menentukan titik lokasi pengeboran menjadi PLTB 6) Material sisa, akan diolah di bak penampung. 7) Pengujian sumur 8) Pembngkaran mesin bor dan fasilitas penunjang 9) Rehabilitas lahan 10) Demobilisasi alat  Dampak Sosial yang akan dikaji : 1) Keterlibatan masyarakat dalam pekerjaan 2) Persepsi/tanggapan masyarakat 3) Kegiatan ekonomi : wisata dengan adanya homestay, kegiatan bertani, warung- warung kecil, dan penginapan. 5. SESI TANYA JAWAB SESI I : PERTANYAAN 1) Alexander Lombo, Guru Desa Waesano. Mantan Ketua BPD.  Merasa bangga dengan rencana dari pusat yang telah melihat potensi dari Sabang – Merauke termasuk Desa Waesano.  Sisi positif upaya pemerintah harus diapresiasi dan didukung.  Hanya perlu dikaji secara mendalam hal-hal yang akan menimbulkan dampak negative. Seperti energy yang akan digunakan yang berasal dari pusat bumi akan membawa berbagai kandungan kimia, seperti dalam proses pengeboran yang akan dilaksanakan. Bagaimana dampak yang akan terjadi dan solusi yang harus dilaksanakan ?  Kondisi alam disini sangat indah, aman dan ada suara alam dengan burung- burung yang senantiasa berkicau setiap hari. Untuk dampak negative yang akan terjadi perlu dikaji secara menyeluruh.  Kondisi di Desa Waesano dan adanya rencana pembangunan di wilayah ini sudah lama dibicarakan mulai dari tingkat bawah sampai menengah. Desa akan menjadi maju karena desa akan terang denga masuknya listrik ke wilayah ini. Tetapi juga akan menjadi mundur karena adanya titik api di wilayah ini. Ada kekhawatiran akan terjadi kondisi seperti di LAPINDO. Siapa yang akan bertanggung jawab ? Bagaimana tindakan yang akan dilakukan baik terhadap lingkungan maupun dengan penghuni (masyarakat) ?  Setuju terhadap rencana kegiatan karena akan memberikan kemajuan.  Keluhan dari masyarakat lewat Musrembang sudah didengar oleh pemerintah.  Perlu dibuat satu rekomendasi terkait hal yang tidak diinginkan dari rencana kegiatan. 2) Lasiuscopon, Desa Waesano  Apa kerugian dari rencana pembangunan PLTPB ? Rencana kegiatan sudah dilaksanakan di Hotel Bintang Flores. Pasti akan ada kerugian yang akan terjadi.  Masih ada keraguan dari rencana kegiatan yang akan dilaksanakan. Perlu mempelajari bahan tayangan yang sudah disampaikan.  Apa sosialisasi yang dilaksanakan sekarang merupakan kiat untuk meminta persetujuan warga ? Kalau memang bermanfaat mengapa tidak langsung dilaksanakan ?  Pemerintah akan melakukan pengeboran perlu diperhatikan dampak terhadap penyakit, juga antisipasinya pasca dampak pengeboran. 3) Matheus  Melihat kejadian kegiatan pengeboran yang telah dilaksanakan di LAPINDO, banyak kecelakaan yang terjadi.  Merasa khawatir terhadap rencana kegiatan karena belum mendengar langkah- langkah yang perlu dilaksanakan untuk menghadapi masalah yang terjadi.  Masih terjadi kekhawatiran di masyarakat terhadap rencana kegiatan. 4) Simon  Telah dilaksanakan kegiatan pengeboran tahun lalu, tapi sampai sekarang belum ada realisasi.  Ada kegiatan pengeboran sedalam 200 meter namun sekarang sudah tidak ada lagi mengapa ? 5) Paulus, Kepala Desa  Kegiatan survey yang akan dilaksanakan merupakan kegiatan lanjutan dari kegiatan sebelumnya. Apabila akan dilakukan pengeboran perlu diinformasikan ke masyarakat.  Kondisi di dekat danau kurang lebih 10 meter sudah ada belerang. Apabila akan dilakukan pengeboran beresiko besar untuk keberadaan danau itu sendiri dan juga wilayah permukiman penduduk yang berlokasi sangat dekat.  Di wilayah lereng gunung seperti di Desa Nunang kondisnya ada kaitan dengan gunung berapi.  Hasil survei yang telah dilaksanakan kalua tidak ada resiko bagi lingkungan, apa manfaatnya bagi masyarakat ? SESI I : JAWABAN 1) Kementrian ESDM Pak Alex  Kementrian ESDM tidak akan menyembunyikan rencana kegiatan dari masyarakat dan akan disampaikan secara transparan ke masyarakat.  Setiap kegiatan ada dampak positif dan negatifnya. Zat-zat kimia bawaan dari hasil pengeboran akan diidentifikasi oleh AECOM.  Pemerintah akan bertanggung jawab melakukan pengelolaan baik dampak positif maupun negatif dari rencana kegiatan.  Kegiatan LAPINDO merupakan lapangan gas yang berbeda dengan panas bumi dengan kondisi batuan yang berbeda pula. Sehingga dampak yang akan ditimbulkan akan berbeda pula.  Energy panas bumi untuk resikonya lebih rendah dari minyak dan gas.  Untuk mengatasi berbagai resiko yang akan terjadi dilakukan standarisasi. Mislanya : a) Mensertifikasi orang-orang yang melakukan kegiatan pengeboran b) Sertifikasi alat yang digunakan c) Proses pengeboran : digunakan BOP yaitu alat untuk mencegah terjadinya dampak seperti di LAPINDO. Masalah yang terjadi di LAPINDO yaitu kurangnya pengawasan terhadap alat-alat yang digunakan.  Dampak yang akan ditimbulkan dengan adanya PLTPB relative minim karena pipa-pipa transmisi yang dipasang akan menyatu dengan alam, sehingga tanaman/pohon dan binatang buas tetap bisa hidup.  Sosialisasi rencana kegiatan sangat diperlukan untuk itu kegiatan yang dilaksanakan pada hari ini adalah untuk menyampaikan rencana kegiatan dan mengadakan diskusi dengan masyarakat.  Dilakukan juga kegiatan monitoring secara periodik untuk melihat pelaksanaan pengelolaan dan kemungkinan dampak yang akan terjadi.  Energy panas bumi tidak akan memberikan pengaruh terhadap air tanah. Pengeboran akan dilaksanakan dengan kedalaman 1.500 meter. 2) Badan Geologi  Kegiatan pengeboran dilakukan guna mengetahui komposisi batuan. Kondisi di wilayah Waesano adalah andesit/basal.  LAPINDO merupakan aktifitas minyak dan gas berbeda karakter batuannya karena berada di wilayah dataran. Kegagalan melakukan pengeboran sebagai akibat adanya bencana gempa bumi di Yogyakarta. Wilayah LAPINDO akan diubah statusnya menjadi kawasan geopark.  Secara geologi di Waesano kondisi batuan keras tidak akan terjadi longsoran. 3) PT. AECOM (Pak Agus)  Akan mengkaji kemungkinan dampak yang akan terjadi di setiap tahapan, baik dampak positif maupun negatifnya. 4) PT. SMI  Pengeboran/eksplorasi akan dilakukan setelah kajian dampak lingkungan dilakukan. SESI II : PERTANYAAN 1) Kepala Desa Waesano  Kami akan menyampaikan informasi sebagai berikut: a) Keberadaan Waesano memiliki banyak potensi sumber daya alam : penduduk, burung-burung, satwa liar, danau, mata air panas, lahan pertanian, ekowisata, sosekbud. Sudah memberikan kontribusi terhadap keberadaan panas bumi. b) Flores telah menjadi asset nasional c) Danau Sano Nggoang merupakan danau dari gunung api, bagaimana kalua kondisnya meletus lagi ? karena ada bau belerang. Pada musim hujan tanah labil/lemah. Ada bunyi dentuman keras. d) Berdasarkan kondisi diatas, perlu dibuat komitmen untuk bisa menjaga kearifan lokal, dimana setiap aktifitas yang akan dilaksanakan tidak akan mengganggu/menjamin bentang alam. 2) Kepala Desa Sano Nggoang  Sosialisasi sudah dilakukan di Kabupaten dan dampak yang akan terjadi juga sudah dibicarakan. Masih merupakan tahapan kajian.  Desa Sano Nggoang memiliki potensi di bidang perkebunan dan pertanian.  Program yang akan dilaksanakan titik sumber pembangkit ada di Desa Sano Nggoang.  Kondisi akan terjadi retak/rawan karena ada kegiatan pemboran. Sehingga apabila ada kendala teknis agar dipikirkan jangan sampai ada sorotan ke pemerintah desa.  Sudah diperhitungkan oleh pemerintah pusat, dampak positif dan negatifnya.  Apabila akan dilakukan kegiatan pengeboran di Sano Nggoang kira-kira akan seperti apa bentuk kegiatannya ? Perhitungannya bagaimana ?  Perlu koordinasi dengan pihak desa apabila akan dilaksanakan kegiatan survey. 3) Desa Pulau Pulau Nuncung  Perlu berpikir secara positif terkait kondisi lingkungan  Kondisi ekonomi masyarakat hanya petani, rencana kegiatan yang akan dilaksanakan harus memperhatikan dampaknya ke masyarakat. Jadi tidaknya diserahkan ke pemerintah pusat. 4) Yayasan Burung  Mengucapkan terima kasih ke pemerintah pusat telah mencoba menawarkan program yang sudah dilaksanakan di wilayah lain dan sekarang akan dilaksanakan di wilayah ini.  Terpenting rencana kegiatan yang akan dilaksanakan harus menerapkan prinsip- prinisip : partisipatif, keserasian, ekologis.  Kecurigaan yang terjadi terhadap rencana proyek karena informasi masih simpang siur karena belum memberikan informasi secara detail ke masyarakat, sampai ke tingkat RT/RW/Kampung.  Kajian eksplorasi perlu disampaikan ke masyaakat agar masyarakat bisa menerima rencana proyek karena pengetahuannya bukan karena keterpaksaan.  Program CSR/Comdev agar bisa sampai dilaksanakan di masyarakat harus membangun komunikasi dan memberdayakan masyarakat.  Fasilitasi masyarakat di ke-3 desa untuk mengunjungi lokasi-lokasi yang ada kegiatan eksplorasinya.  Perlu ada kejelasan berapa lama kegiatan eksplorasi dan eksploitasi akan dilaksanakan ?  Perlu dibangun kesepakatan antara kedua belah pihak.  Perlu adanya selektifitas terhadap informmasi baru yang sampai ke masyarakat. 5) ALFONS  Masyarakat tidak memiliki keahlian khusus untuk melakukan pengeboran.  Hasil pengeboran harus dapat dinikmati oleh masyarakat, jangan sampai masyarakat hanya menjadi penonton. 6) BONI  Pembangunan yang akan dilaksanakan agar dapat mewujudkan partisipasi masyarakat dalam setiap tahap kegiatan.  Harus ada garansi/jaminan dari kecamatan/desa untuk memberikan penjelasan bahwa rencana kegiatan aman.  Rencana kegiatan harus dipublikasikan dengan baik dan disampaikan secara bertahap sesuai dengan rencana kegiatan yang akan dilaksanakan.  Kondisi alam di wilayah ini masih baik, maka rencana kegiatan harus dapat menjamin kondisi akan lebih baik. 7) STEFAN  Salut untuk program eksplorasi yang akan dilaksanakan di wilayah ini.  Kegiatan masih tahap perencanaan, jadi kondisi masih 50 : 50.  Prosedur/mekanisme kerja yang berhubungan dengan lahan, bagaimana resikonya ?  Perlu dijelaskan tahapan kerja dari kegiatan yanag akan dilaksanakan.  Harus dilibatkan tokoh masyarakat di wilayah ini dalam setiap tahapan kegiatan  Sumber Daya Alam di Desa Waesano merupakan icon kedua setelah Pulau Komodo. Perlu dikaji bagaimana dampaknya terhadap pariwisata.  Listrik bisa masuk ke Desa Waesano merupakan mimpi kami dan merupakan tanda kemajuan.  Memang ada ketakutan/kekhawatiran di masyarakat. Maka perlu dilakukan penjelasan secara terus menerus di masyarakat. SESI II : JAWABAN 1) Kementrian ESDM  Guna menyampaikan rencana kegiatan secara jelas ke masyarakat akan ada rencana untuk mengundang tokoh-tokoh masyarakat untuk dating ke lokasi-lokasi dimana kegiatan eksplorasi panas bumi dilaksanakan. Misalnya dengan mengundang tokoh masyarakat ke Gunung Salak dan wilayah lainnya.  Setiap rencana kegiatan pasti ada dampak positif maupun negative. Dampak negative untuk kegiatan eksplorasi panas bumi memang ada, hanya minimal.  Program CSR/Comdev yang akan dilaksanakan tidak hanya untuk kegiatan-kegiatan sosial, seperti membangun rumah ibadah, tapi akan diarahkan untuk program berkesinambungan untuk meningkatkan taraf ekonomi dan sosial masyarakat.  Komunikasi secara intensif dengan masyarakat akan dilaksanakan  Tahapan Eksplorasi – Eksploitasi sangat tergantung dari hasil kajian.  Komitmen masyarakat untuk melakukan pengawasan terhadap berbagai dampak yang akan terjadi sangat diperlukan. 2) PT. SMI  Badan Geologi + SMI telah melaksanakan kegiatan survei awal dengan menangkap adanya potensi panas bumi di wilayah ini. Diajukan untuk dieksplorasi karena perlu dibuktikan. Biaya yang harus dikeluarkan mencapai 400 miliar untuk mengetahui di bawah ada potensi sebesar apa. Dana yang akan dikeluarkan merupakan gabungan dari Hibah World Bank dan APBN.  Untuk kegiatan eksplorasi sendiri biaya belum ada.  Perlu juga dilakukan kajian lingkungan, dapat dilaksanakan apabila semua aspek mendukung.  Pelaksanaan Comdev akan masuk dalam skema eksplorasi jika akan dilaksanakan.  Kegiatan yang dilaksanakan saat ini akan dijadikan model karena pemerintah belum pernah melaksanakan kegiatan eksplorasi secara lengsung, biasanya yang melaksanakan swasta.  Sosialisasi yang dilaksnakan untuk memenuhi peraturan yang berlaku dan harus dilaksanakan mulai dari perencanaan.  Pembebasan lahan akan mengikuti peraturan yang berlaku.  Proses jual beli secara langsung akan dilaksanakan, apabila sesuai dengan peraturan yang berlaku.  Apabila status tanah adat prosesnya bagaimana ? hal ini perlu dilakukan kajian  Untuk mendapatkan izin eksplorasi ada 30 izin yang harus dipenuhi dan membutuhkan waktu 7 tahun sampai ada listrik. Kalau dilaksanakan pihak swasta memakan waktu 6 – 7 tahun.  Tahapan eksploitasi merupakan proses sampai menghasilkan energy listrik. KESIMPULAN 1. Masih terjadi pro dan kontra di masyarakat terhadap rencana pembangunan eksplorasi panas bumi. Masyarakat yang tidak setuju karena merasa khawatir akan terjadi dampak seperti kasus LAPINDO juga akan mengganggu kondisi flora dan fauna yang telah dijadikan icon kedua setelah Pulau Komodo. 2. Rencana kegiatan secara detail belum tersampaikan di masyarakat, sehingga masih terjadi simpang siur informasi. 3. Masyarakat belum memahami dampak positif maupun negative dari rencana kegiatan secara benar. 4. Perlu dijalin komunikasi dan koordinasi secara intensif dengan kecamatan, desa, tokoh masyarakat dan masyarakat yang akan terkena dampak. 5. Perlu dilakukan kajian mendalam terhadap kondisi flora, fauna, sosial ekonomi dan budaya masyarakat agar dapat diketahui dampak dan pengelolaannya secara komprehensif. Pre-Public Consultation Second Round Minutes of Meeting (21st – 23rd March 2017) Participatory Social Mapping Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Appendix C Public Consultation Photo Documentation PreparedFor: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 49 First Round of Public Consultation (3rd November 2016) Pre-Public Consultation Second Round (21st – 23rd March 2017) Sano Nggoang Village Wae Sano Village Pulau Nuncung Village Esia Disclosure-Second Round of Public Consultation (15th May 2018) Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Appendix D Public Consultation Presentation Material PreparedFor: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 50 Sosialisasi Studi Lingkungan dan Sosial Rencana Kegiatan Eksplorasi Situs Panas Bumi Desa Wae Sano dan Sano Nggoang, Kecamatan Sano Nggoang, Kabupaten Manggarai Barat Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur 03 November 2016 Agenda Acara 1. Kegiatan Upacara Adat 2. Pembukaan oleh Protokol Acara 3. Kata Sambutan oleh Bupati / Wakil Bupati Manggarai Barat 4. Presentasi dari Perwakilan Direktorat Panas Bumi, Kementerian ESDM 5. Presentasi dari perwakilan PRKN Kementerian Keuangan 6. Penjelasan Rencana Kegiatan Eksplorasi Panas Bumi oleh Tim SMI 7. Penjelasan potensi dampak lingkungan dan sosial oleh Tim Konsultan AECOM 8. Penjelasan Rencana Kegiatan Survei Lingkungan dan Sosial 9. Diskusi dan Tanya Jawab 10. Pembacaan Hasil & Penandatanganan Berita Acara 11. Penutup oleh Protokol Acara Wae Sano 03 November 2016 TUJUAN SOSIALISASI 1) MENYAMPAIKAN INFORMASI 2) MENCIPTAKAN SUASANA KEMITRAAN 3) MENAMPUNG SARAN, PENDAPAT DAN TANGGAPAN Informasi yang akan disampaikan : 1) Pemrakarsa Kegiatan 2) Jenis Rencana Kegiatan 3) Lokasi Rencana Kegiatan 4) Potensi Dampak Lingkungan & Sosial Wae Sano 03 November 2016 Halaman 3 PEMRAKARSA KEGIATAN KEMENTERIAN ENERGI DAN SUMBER DAYA MINERAL (ESDM) Up. Divisi Pengembangan Proyek dan Advisory 3 Alamat : Sahid Sudirman Center Lantai 47-48, Jl. Jend. Sudirman No. 86, Jakarta Pusat DKI Jakarta 10220, Indonesia Telepon : (021) 8082 5288 Faksimili : (021) 80825258 Email : eksplorasipanasbumiwaesano@gmail.com Wae Sano 03 November 2016 Halaman 4 LOKASI RENCANA KEGIATAN Desa Wae Sano dan Sano Nggoang, Kec. Sano Nggoang, Kab. Manggarai Barat, Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur Crossrail United Kingdom Gambar 1. Lokasi Daerah Prospek Panas Bumi Wae Sano Wae Sano 03 November 2016 Halaman 5 LOKASI RENCANA KEGIATAN Sano Nggoang Crossrail United Kingdom Wae Sano Gambar 2. Usulan Lokasi Kegiatan Eksplorasi Wae Sano 03 November 2016 Halaman 6 JENIS RENCANA KEGIATAN (PRA-EKSPLORASI) 1. Mobilisasi Peralatan Lokasi Kegiatan Wae Sano 03 November 2016 Halaman 7 JENIS RENCANA KEGIATAN (PRA-EKSPLORASI) 2. Konstruksi Tapak Pengeboran Wae Sano 03 November 2016 Halaman 8 JENIS RENCANA KEGIATAN (PRA-EKSPLORASI) 3. Pemasangan Pompa Air Wae Sano 03 November 2016 Halaman 9 JENIS RENCANA KEGIATAN (PRA-EKSPLORASI) Water Pump 4. Konstruksi Bak Penampungan dan Pengolahan Material Sisa Pengeboran Wae Sano 03 November 2016 Halaman 10 JENIS RENCANA KEGIATAN (EKSPLORASI) 1. Pengeboran Eksplorasi Wae Sano 03 November 2016 Halaman 11 JENIS RENCANA KEGIATAN (EKSPLORASI) 2. Pengolahan Material Sisa Pengeboran Wae Sano 03 November 2016 Halaman 12 JENIS RENCANA KEGIATAN (EKSPLORASI) 3. Pengambilan Air untuk Pengeboran Wae Sano 03 November 2016 Halaman 13 JENIS RENCANA KEGIATAN (EKSPLORASI) 4. Pengujian Sumur Wae Sano 03 November 2016 Halaman 14 JENIS RENCANA KEGIATAN (PASCA EKSPLORASI) 1. Pembongkaran Mesin Bor dan Fasilitas Rehabilitasi Sumur Penunjangnya 2. Rehabilitasi Lahan 3. Demobilisasi Alat 4. Pengamanan Sumur Bor Pengamanan Sumur Wae Sano 03 November 2016 Halaman 15 POTENSI DAMPAK LINGKUNGAN & SOSIAL (PRA EKSPLORASI)  Dampak fisik  Lalu lintas,  Kondisi Jalan,  Kebisingan dan Debu,  Kualitas air,  Dampak Biologi  Flora  Fauna (Burung)  Dampak Sosial  Keterlibatan Masyarakat dalam Pekerjaan  Persepsi/tanggapan Masyarakat  Kegiatan Ekonomi Wae Sano 03 November 2016 Halaman 16 POTENSI DAMPAK LINGKUNGAN & SOSIAL (EKSPLORASI)  Dampak fisik  Buangan Gas Belerang,  Kualitas air,  Dampak Biologi  Fauna (Burung)  Dampak Sosial  Persepsi/tanggapan Masyarakat  Kegiatan Ekonomi Wae Sano 03 November 2016 Halaman 17 POTENSI DAMPAK LINGKUNGAN & SOSIAL (PASCA EKSPLORASI)  Dampak fisik  Kebocoran Gas,  Dampak Sosial  Keamanan Masyarakat  Persepsi/tanggapan Masyarakat Wae Sano 03 November 2016 Halaman 18 RENCANA KEGIATAN SURVEI LINGKUNGAN DAN SOSIAL 1. Persiapan 2. Mobilisasi Tim 3. Pengamatan dan Pengambilan Contoh (4 – 11 November 2016) – Komponen fisika-kimia (5 orang) – Komponen biologi (3 orang) – Komponen sosial (3 orang) 4. Demobilisasi 5. Analisis Data 6. Pelaporan Wae Sano 03 November 2016 Halaman 19 KEGIATAN SAMPLING (FISIK KIMIA) Wae Sano 03 November 2016 Halaman 20 KEGIATAN SURVEI BIOLOGI Wae Sano 03 November 2016 Halaman 21 RENCANA KEGIATAN SURVEI SOSIAL Wae Sano 03 November 2016 Halaman 22 PENYAMPAIAN SARAN, PERTANYAAN DAN TANGGAPAN Saran, masukan, pendapat dan tanggapan dapat disampaikan kepada – Badan Lingkungan Hidup (BLH) Kabupaten Manggarai Barat Alamat : Jl. Daniel Daeng Nabit, Labuan Bajo, Flores, Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur 86554 Telepon : 0821 4508 5707 – KEMENTERIAN ENERGI DAN SUMBER DAYU MINERAL (ESDM) Up. Divisi Pengembangan Proyek dan Advisory 3 Alamat :Sahid Sudirman Center Lantai 47-48, Jl. Jend. Sudirman No. 86, Jakarta Pusat DKI Jakarta 10220, Indonesia Telepon : (021) 8082 5288 Faksimili : (021) 80825258 Email : eksplorasipanasbumiwaesano@gmail.com Hamad Port Doha, Qatar Wae Sano 03 November 2016 Halaman 23 PENYAMPAIAN SARAN, PERTANYAAN DAN TANGGAPAN Hamad Port Doha, Qatar Wae Sano 03 November 2016 Halaman 24 Terima Kasih aecom.or.id 03 November 2016 Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 Appendix E ESIA Disclosure Minutes Meeting, Attendance List, Photos Documentation, and Presentation Material PreparedFor: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 51 ESIA Disclosure (Second Public Consultation) (15th May 2018) Kegiatan Eksplorasi Situs Panas Bumi Waesano Konsultasi Publik Tahap 2 15 Mei 2018 Agenda Acara 1. Registrasi Peserta 2. Pembukaan oleh Protokol Acara dan Doa (5 Menit) 3. Kata Sambutan oleh Bupati/Wakil Bupati Manggarai Barat (5 Menit) 4. Kata Sambutan dari Perwakilan Direktorat Panas Bumi, Kementerian ESDM (5 Menit) 5. Kata Sambutan dari Perwakilan Kementerian Keuangan (5 Menit) 6. Potensi Panas Bumi Waesano dan Rencana Kegiatan Eksplorasi Panas Bumi Waesano (Badan Geologi dan PT SMI)) – 20 Menit 2 Agenda Acara 7. Penjelasan Potensi Dampak dan Rencana Pengelolaan Lingkungan dan Sosial (oleh Tim Konsultan AECOM) – 15 Menit 8. Pesan dan Kesan atas Kunjungan ke Proyek PLTP Patuha dan PLTP Kamojang, Jawa Barat (5 Menit) 9. Diskusi dan Tanya Jawab 10. Istirahat dan Makan Siang 11. Pembacaan Hasil & Penandatangan Berita Acara 12. Penutup oleh Protokol Acara 3 Latar Belakang 4 Apa Tujuan Konsultasi Publik?  Menyampaikan informasi  Menampung pendapat atau saran 5 Mengapa harus dilakukan Konsultasi Publik Tahap 2? Masyarakat berhak mengetahui*: 1. Pemrakarsa Kegiatan 2. Kegiatan yang telah, sedang dan akan dilaksanakan 3. Potensi Dampak Lingkungan dan Sosial 4. Rencana Pengelolaan Dampak Lingkungan dan Sosial *) Sesuai dengan saran Bank Dunia (Environmental Assessment OP 4.01) 6 Gambaran Umum Kegiatan Eksplorasi Panas Bumi Wae Sano 7 Koordinasi Pelaksanaan Kegiatan dan Pelibatan Masyarakat Koordinasi dengan Pemerintah Pusat: - Komite Bersama Proyek - Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Koordinasi dengan Pemerintah Kabupaten:  Pembentukan Satuan Kerja  Rapat Koordinasi Kerjasama dengan Bank Dunia dan Pemerintah Selandia Baru untuk Peningkatan Kapasitas SDM Pelibatan masyarakat:  Kunjungan Pemkab Mabar dan Masyarakat ke PLTP Patuha dan Kamojang di Jawa Barat, Juni 2016  Pra Konsultasi Publik, Labuhan Bajo, 15 September 2016  Konsultasi Publik Tahap Pertama, Nunang, 3 November 2016  Pemetaan Reseptor Sensitif dan Sosial Budaya Berbasis Partisipasi Masyarakat, di Desa Wae Sano, P.Nuncung dan Sano Nggoang, 21-23 Maret 2017 8 Status Kegiatan Sampai Saat Ini Survei yang sudah dilakukan  Survey pendahuluan (geologi, geofisika, geokimia)  Studi lingkungan dan sosial  Survei kelayakan infrastrukur  Survei topografi dan geoteknik  Survey bathymetry (kedalaman dan suhu) danau Persiapan pada tingkat pusat  Penyiapan dana kegiatan  Rekrutmen tenaga ahli 12 Survei & Sosialisasi yang akan dilakukan:  Survey & Pengukuran Batas Tanah/Lahan oleh Tim GeoIndo  Survei Sosial Ekonomi Pemilik Tanah/Lahan -> Rencana Penggunaan Tanah/Lahan oleh Tim AECOM  Sosialisasi Rencana Penggunaan Tanah/Lahan oleh Tim AECOM Perizinan: − Rekomendasi Prinsip dari Bupati − Surat Kesesuaian Tata Ruang − Izin Lingkungan − Izin Pinjam Pakai Kawasan Hutan (IPPKH) − Izin Penggunaan Air − Izin Pengelolaan Limbah Sementara 13 Jadwal Kegiatan (Pekerjaan Sipil) 14 Lokasi Rencana Pemboran Eksplorasi  Sumur-A di Dusun Lempe  Sumur-B di Dusun Nunang  Sumur-D di Dusun Dasak  Sumur-E (alternatif) di Dusun Ta’al 16 Potensi Dampak Sosial & Lingkungan 20 Dampak Positif (Jangka Pendek) 1. Infrastruktur jalan yang lebih baik, sehingga memperlancar arus transportasi penumpang dan barang 2. Terbukanya kesempatan kerja dan berusaha untuk mendukung kegiatan Proyek 3. Terbukanya wawasan masyarakat tentang potensi sumber daya alam selain ekowisata berupa pemandangan alam (danau), air panas dan ekowisata minat khusus (pengamatan burung) 21 Dampak Positif (Jangka Menengah - Panjang) 1. Kemajuan ekonomi daerah yang ditopang oleh ketersediaan energi listrik yang memadai 2. Kesejahteraan masyarakat meningkat sebagai efek berganda (multiplier effect) kemajuan ekonomi daerah, khususnya sektor energi, pertanian dan pariwisata 3. Meningkatnya taraf pendidikan dan kesehatan sebagai dampak timbal balik meningkatnya kesejahteraan masyarakat 22 Antisipasi & Mitigasi Dampak Sosial Lainnya (Jangka Pendek dan Sementara) Dialog dengan Masyarakat yang terkena dampak serta unsur terkait untuk mengatasi permasalahan yang timbul akibat:  Perubahan fungsi tanah pada lokasi yang digunakan untuk Proyek  Perekrutan tenaga kerja lokal  Perbedaan pandangan antara pekerja pendatang dan masyarakat setempat  Dampak lingkungan yang terjadi 23 Antisipasi & Mitigasi Dampak Sosial Lainnya (Jangka Pendek dan Sementara) Untuk mengurangi gangguan kenyamanan/ kesehatan masyarakat akibat meningkatnya kebisingan, emisi kendaraan dan debu pada waktu tertentu (mobilisasi kendaraan pengangkut peralatan dan material, pemboran sumur eksplorasi):  Pengaturan waktu kegiatan  Penerapan syarat Baku Mutu Emisi Pemeliharaan Berkala bagi kendaraan Proyek dan  Penyiraman jalan 24 Antisipasi & Mitigasi Dampak Sosial Lainnya (Jangka Pendek dan Sementara) Untuk mengurangi gangguan keselamatan masyarakat akibat meningkatnya lalu lintas Proyek pada waktu tertentu (mobilisasi kendaraan pengangkut peralatan dan material)  Penerapan waktu aktivitas Proyek,  Pemasangan rambu-rambu dan  Penempatan petugas pengatur lalu lintas 25 Antisipasi & Mitigasi Dampak Lingkungan (Jangka Pendek dan Sementara) Menghindari dan mengurangi dampak terhadap satwa liar:  Pemagaran sekitar area proyek  Stop bekerja sementara apabila terdapat satwa liar masuk dalam wilayah kerja, sampai dilakukan evakuasi  Sosialisasi terhadap pekerja: • Jenis satwa liar dan habitatnya di sekitar lokasi proyek • Konservasi satwa liar yang dilindungi • Larangan menangkap, berburu dan membunuh satwa liar 26 Antisipasi & Mitigasi Dampak Lingkungan (Jangka Pendek dan Sementara) Menghindari dan mengurangi dampak terhadap kualitas air permukaan dengan Prosedur Standar Operasi Pengelolaan Limbah Pemboran Eksplorasi (sisa lumpur dan serbuk pemboran), termasuk:  Penyediaan kolam penampungan sementara didasari dengan lapisan HDPE (bersifat kedap air)  Pengujian kualitas limbah -> apakah berbahaya bagi lingkungan atau tidak jika dibuang atau dimanfaatkan  Pemantauan selama pemboran 27 Kolam Penampungan Sementara Limbah Pemboran Kolam Penampungan Sementara Limbah Pemboran 29 Presentation Title Antisipasi & Mitigasi Dampak Lingkungan (Jangka Pendek dan Sementara) Menghindari dan mengurangi resiko terjadinya pencemaran tanah dan air tanah:  Penggunaan palet  Aplikasi Oil Spill Kit (kain majun/pasir/ serbuk gergaji, dsb) untuk mengatasi tumpahan  Pengecekan rutin untuk memastikan langkah pencegahan dan peralatan/ fasilitas pencegahan berfungsi dengan baik 30 Antisipasi & Mitigasi Dampak Lingkungan (Jangka Pendek dan Sementara) Untuk mencegah dan mengurangi resiko dan bahaya terhadap lingkungan setelah pemboran eksplorasi selesai, dilakukan:  Rehabilitasi Lingkungan  Pengamanan sumur bor yang potensial dengan: • Pemasangan alat pencegah kebocoran • Pemasangan pagar • Pemasangan rambu peringatan 31 Antisipasi & Mitigasi Dampak Lingkungan dan Sosial (Jangka Pendek dan Sementara) Penerapan Mekanisme Penanganan Keluhan: 1. Penerimaan keluhan dari masyarakat 2. Pencatatan keluhan masyarakat 3. Validasi dan verifikasi keluhan bersama masyarakat yang menyampaikan keluhan dan pihak terkait lainnya (jika diperlukan) 4. Perencanaan penanganan keluhan 5. Penyampaian tata cara penanganan keluhan dan perkiraan waktu penyelesaian keluhan kepada masyarakat yang menyampaikan keluhan 6. Penyelesaian keluhan 7. Penyampaian hasil penyelesaian keluhan kepada masyarakat yang menyampaikan keluhan 8. Penutupan keluhan 32 Tanya & Jawab 33 Tata Cara  Sesi tanya jawab: 4 Tahap  Tahap 1: Tokoh Adat/Agama dan Masyarakat  Tahap 2: LSM & Tokoh Pemuda/i  Tahap 3: Kelompok Wanita  Tahap 4: SKPD Kabupaten/Kecamatan Setiap Peserta Tanya Jawab diharap menyebutkan: • Nama • Desa tempat tinggal/Organisasi/Kelompok yang diwakili • Pertanyaan/tanggapan secara ringkas dan jelas 34 TERIMA KASIH Stakeholder Engagement Plan PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 PT AECOM Indonesia South Quarter Building Tower-C 5th-floor Jl. R.A. Kartini Kav.8 Jakarta Selatan Jakarta - Indonesia aecom.com PreparedFor: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 52 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) Appendix I Community Baseline Profile Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM I Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study 1. Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline 1.3 Social, Economic, and Cultural Component The social, economic, and cultural component of the baseline study addresses factors such as the demography, economic status and cultural resources of the local community within the study area as shown in Figure 6-1. In particular, these factors will be considered for Wae Sano, Sano Nggoang, and Pulau Nuncung Villages in Sano Nggoang Sub-district, West Manggarai Regency. The project site for Waesano geothermal exploration activities is located in Sano Nggoang Sub-district. The actual well-pads will be located in Wae Sano and Sano Nggoang Village. Pulau Nuncung Village is the nearest village (located at the west part of Lake Sano Nggoang) to the geothermal site that will not contain a well pad. This village is included in the scope of study area due to the potential for indirect impacts from geothermal exploration activity in this area, such as air quality impacts due to mobilization and construction of well pads and supporting facilities as well as the requirement of local labor during construction and operation phases. The data used for this baseline study includes both secondary sources such as government census data, as well as household surveys with residents in Wae Sano, Sano Nggoang and Pulau Nuncung Villages in 2016. A total of 96 household representatives were interviewed, comprising 88 male and 8 female respondents. Male respondents were interviewed more than female respondents as most heads of households are male. For men, the age of the respondents ranged from 26-84 years old, and for women it ranged from 35-55 years old. These respondents lived at Nunang, Lempe, Ta’al, Dasak, and Wakar Sub-villages (Dusun) in Wae Sano Village; Nggoang, Golo Mburing, Cowang Anak, and Bokak Rangga Sub-villages (Dusun) in Sano Nggoang Village; and Lokong and Kandang Sub-villages (Dusun) in Pulau Nuncung Village. Further details are provided in Table 1-1. Table 1-1 Total Respondents Interviewed Total Respondents (Head of Location Family) Wae Sano Village 46 Sano Nggoang Village 22 Pulau Nuncung Village 28 Total 96 A general description of the respondents targeted for this study can be seen in Figure 1-1 and Figure 1-2. From the total interviewed respondents, 88% % were titled as husband and 96% male were % head of family (KK). Child Wife Husband Male Female 5% 7% 4% 88% 96% Figure 1-1 Respondent Status Figure 1-2 Head of Family by Sex Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-1 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study 1.3.1 Demography Demographic data is used as a basis to assess the socio-economic condition in the areas surrounding the project. This data can be utilized as a reference for workforce needs of the Waesano geothermal exploration activity and is useful information to understand the total population affected by geothermal exploration in this area. 1.3.1.1 Population The total population in West Manggarai Regency is 257,582 people with up to 2.34% population growth rate in 2015-2016. This is an increase of 0.05% from the previous year, potentially resulting from the growing population of West Manggarai Regency itself as well as migration from the surrounding area. As seen in the population pyramid (Figure 1-3), West Manggarai Regency is dominated by a younger. This is due to higher fertility and mortality rates in 2015, as well as lower life expectancy. The male population is 2% lower than the female population in West Manggarai Regency, due to men in the regency moving to cities to find work. 65+ 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 Male 30-34 Female 25-29 20-24 15-19 10-14 5-9 0-4 20000 10000 0 10000 20000 Source: (Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Manggarai Barat, 2017) Figure 1-3 Population Pyramid of West Manggarai Regency Sano Nggoang Sub-district, in the area of study, has been divided into two sub-districts including Sano Nggoang and Mbeliling. The total area of Sano Nggoang and Mbeliling Sub-districts is 55,518 ha or 18.8% of the total mainland of West Manggarai. The capital of Sano Nggoang Sub-district is Werang, and this sub-district is responsible for 15 villages, divided into 130 Rukun Tetangga (RT) under its coordination. Those villages are:  Matawae  Wae Sano  Sano Nggoang  Golo Sengang  Golo Mbu  Golo Manting  Golo Ndaring  Golo Kempo  Nampar Macing  Golo Leleng  Wae Lolos  Pulau Nuncung  Watu Panggal  Golo Kondeng  Poco Golo Kempo Prior to expansion of the area by the local government, Wae Sano Village was the only village around Lake Sano Nggoang. Currently, Wae Sano has been divided into three villages, namely Wae Sano, Sano Nggoang, and Pulau Nuncung. Wae Sano Village has seven sub-villages, which are Taal 1, Taal 2, Nunang, Lempe, Dasak, Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-2 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study Ponceng and Wakar. Sano Nggoang Village has four sub-villages, called Nggoang, Cowang Anak, Bokak Rongga and Golom Mboring while Pulau Nuncung has four sub-villages, namely Lokong, Angkor, Kandang, and Lenda. Table 1-2 shows the population of West Manggarai Regency, Sano Nggoang Sub-district, Wae Sano Village, Sano Nggoang Village, and Pulau Nuncung Village. Table 1-2 Demography in Study Area, 2016 Study Area Total Population (people) Gender Population Total Average Area Ratio Density Household Number of 2 2 (km ) (people/km ) (HH) Occupants Male Female Total (people/HH) West Manggarai 2,947.50 127,409 130,173 257,582 98 85 59,658 4 Regency Sano Nggoang 241.88 7,234 7,134 14,368 101 59 3,284 4 Sub-district Wae Sano Village 20 578 627 1,205 88 60 277 4 Sano Nggoang 23 552 537 1,089 79 47 248 4 Village Pulau Nuncung 11,29 326 284 610 92 54 129 5 Village Source: (Central Bureau of Statistics of Sano Nggoang Sub-district, 2017); (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017) 700 600 500 Population 400 300 200 100 0 Male Female Male Female Male Female 2014 2015 2016 Wae Sano Village 525 572 578 607 578 627 Sano Nggoang Village 535 604 549 531 552 537 Pulau Nuncung Village 336 310 318 293 326 284 Source: (Central Bureau of Statistics of Sano Nggoang Sub-district, 2017) Figure 1-4 Population Number in Wae Sano Sano Nggoang and Pulau Nuncung Villages by Sex, 2014 - 2016 As shown in Table 1-2, the population of Sano Nggoang Sub-district in 2016 was 14,368 people. The total population of Wae Sano Village was 1,205 people which consist of 578 males and 627 females. Sano Nggoang Village had a total population of 552 males and 537 females. There were 610 people recorded in Pulau Nuncung Village, comprising 326 males and 284 females. This village has the lowest population among the three villages surrounding Lake Sano Nggoang. Total head of family (KK) in Sano Nggoang Sub-district in 2016 was 3,284 KK. The distribution of KK in Wae Sano was about 6.7%; Sano Nggoang Village was 7.3%; Pulau Nuncung Village was 3.8% of total KK in Sano Nggoang Sub-district. In nearly all study areas, the average number of occupants was 4 people in each household for Sano Nggoang Sub-district, Wae Sano Village and Sano Nggoang Village. Pulau Nuncung Village has a higher average number of occupants with 5 people per household. 2 2 2 The total area of Wae Sano, Sano Nggoang, and Pulau Nuncung is about 20 km , 23 km , and 11.29 km , respectively, which also means 8.27%, 9.51%, and 4.67% of the total area of Sano Nggoang Sub-district area. Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-3 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study Population Density Population density in Sano Nggoang Sub-district in 2016 was about 59 people per km2. The population of Wae Sano Village accounted for some 8.4% of the population in Sano Nggoang Sub-district, with population density slightly higher than the sub-district, about 60 people per km2. Sano Nggoang Village has the lowest population density with 47 people per km2, compared to other study areas. All are less populated than West Manggarai Regency. Gender Ratio As shown in Table 1-2, the population structure by gender in the study area shows that the percentage of male population in Sano Nggoang Sub-district (50.35%) is slightly higher than the female population (49.65%) or gender ratio of 101 (this means that there are 101 males for every 100 females). Wae Sano, Sano Nggoang and Pulau Nuncung Villages also have fewer men than women, with gender ratio of 88, 79, and 92, respectively. The same occurs in the West Manggarai area where the female population is higher than the male population, with a gender ratio of 98. Dependency Ratio Dependency ratio (i.e. the ratio between the economically-productive age population (15 to 64 years old) and the non-economically-productive population) in West Manggarai is high at 77.08%. This means that every 100 economically-productive persons have to support 77 non-economically productive persons. This appears to have been affected by an increase in the 10-14 year-old portion of the population in 2016. According to Central Bureau of Statistics, the dependency ratio in Pulau Nuncung Village is the highest (65), consisting of not-yet - economically-productive persons including 52 younger people and 13 older-aged people (see Table 1-3). Table 1-3 Dependency Ratio in Study Area Younger People Older People Location Dependency Ratio Dependency Ratio Total Dependency Ratio (0 to 14 years old) (+65 and over year old) West Manggarai Regency 70.64 6.44 77.08 Sano Nggoang Sub-district 47.61 9.35 56.96 Wae Sano Village 50.97 9.73 60.71 Sano Nggoang Village 50.84 7.46 58.30 Pulau Nuncung Village 52.50 12.76 64.97 Source: (Central Bureau of Statistics of Sano Nggoang Sub-district, 2017); (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017) 1.3.1.2 Workforce Technically, the population in the productive age category is divided into 2 groups, workforce and non-workforce. ”Workforce’ consists of people who are actively employed or seeking employment. People who are classified as seeking employment are mentioned as open unemployment. People who are categorised as non-workforce are those who are still of school age, homemakers, pensioners, and others. The method of workforce counting in Indonesia is 15-64 years old as stipulated by Law No. 13 of 20031 which aligns with the international standard (i.e. International Labour Organisation (ILO). As seen in Table 1-4, in 2016, there were 153,492 people in the productive age category who lived in West Manggarai Regency with a workforce population of approximately 109,577, and a non-workforce population of 43,915. The Workforce Participation Rate or WPR (Tingkat Partisipasi Angkatan Kerja, TPAK) is the percentage of working-age people who are active in the job market (either as a worker or job seeker/unemployed), compared with the total working-age population. The WPR of West Manggarai Regency in 2016 was 71.38%. This number is similar to the previous year, which was 71.39%. Information for the workforce in Sano Nggoang Sub-district is not available in Central Bureau of Statistics or CBS ( BPS) data. 1 https://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/docs/ELECTRONIC/64764/71554/F1102622842/IDN64764.pdf Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-4 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study Table 1-4 Population Category of Productive Age by Main Activity and Gender in West Manggarai Regency Population Category Male Female Total Productive Age Population 75,293 78,199 153,492 Workforce 63,255 46,322 109,577 Employed 61,608 45,385 106,993 Unemployed 1,647 937 2,584 Non-workforce 12,038 31,877 43,915 School 7,661 8.881 16,542 Taking care of household 91 20,083 20,174 Others 4,286 2,913 7,199 Source: (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017) Open Unemployment Rate or OUR (Tingkat Pengangguran Terbuka, TPT) is the portion of workforce who are not working or are currently looking for a job (both for the people who have not worked yet and people who have worked before), those who are actively preparing a business, people who are not looking for a job but are able- bodied, and people who already have a job but have not yet started worked. The proportion or total open employment of the workforce can be used for the government reference for opening a new job field. OUR in West Manggarai Regency in 2016 was 2.36% of the total workforce. This number is similar to the previous year. Meanwhile, Work Opportunity Rate or WOR ( Tingkat Kesempatan Kerja, TKK) in West Manggarai Regency was about 97.64%. This condition indicated that work opportunities opening in 2016 could only absorb 0.45% of the workforce in West Manggarai. Based on Sano Nggoang Sub-District data in 2016, the total workforce in Sano Nggoang Sub-district, Wae Sano Village, Sano Nggoang Village, and Pulau Nuncung Village was 9,075 people, 742 people, 719 people, and 376 people, respectively. The total non-workforce in Sano Nggoang Sub-district, Wae Sano Village, Sano Nggoang Village, and Pulau Nuncung Village was 739 people, 610 people, 592 people, and 316 people, respectively. Table 1-5 illustrates total population of people working in Sano Nggoang Sub-district (7,227 people), Wae Sano Village (631 people), Sano Nggoang Village (580 people), and Pulau Nuncung Village (340 people). The table notes the number of unemployed people in each village. Table 1-5 Population by Type of Job in Study Area Location Type of Job Sano Nggoang Wae Sano Sano Nggoang Pulau Nuncung Sub-district Village Village Village Unemployed 2,165 390 233 54 Taking care of household 1,312 9 12 12 Student 4,038 209 347 250 Pensionary 24 2 0 0 Government employee (PNS) 186 15 15 5 Indonesian National Police (POLRI) 2 0 0 0 Farmer 6,603 590 536 318 Honorary employee 175 11 18 7 Private Employee 58 0 1 0 Monk 2 0 0 0 Driver 35 0 1 0 Village Staff 166 15 9 10 Source: (Sano Nggoang Sub-district, 2016) According to interviews and surveys conducted in 2016, the potential workforce in Wae Sano Village are about 150 people who could doing work as a mason or carpenters living in Poceng, Wakar and Nunang Sub-villages. The community has a high willingness to work. However, the population in Nunang Sub-village is dominated by older people, where potential workforce is about 20 people who could do work as a mason or carpenters. Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-5 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study 1.3.1.3 Education Community indicators of quality and well-being in a given area can be observed from its education facilities. Community participation in education is shown by the magnitude of School Participation Rate or SPR ( Angka Partisipasi Sekolah, APS) of a community in all population groups of school age people. SPR is the percentage of people who are still attending school at a given age, compared with the overall population of that same age group. This number shows how many persons of school age have utilised available education facilities. The increase of school participation rates illustrates success in the education sector, especially related to the ability to expand education facilities. Table 1-6 shows the School Participation Rate (SPR) in West Manggarai Regency for ages 5-24 years. The SPR for 16-18 years of age was about 58.71%, a decrease from the previous year at 66.57%. The SPR for 19-24 years of age increased 1.46% from previous year to 11.16%. The most interesting point is the high rate of SPR for group of female population ages 7-12 years and 13-15 years achieving 99.51% and 97.23%, compared to the male population in the same age range. Table 1-6 School Participation Rate by Gender and Age Group in West Manggarai Regency School Participation Rate Age Group Male Female Total 5-6 years 19.30 37.54 29.23 7-12 years 98.71 99.51 99.11 13-15 years 90.32 97.23 93.26 16-18 years 60.26 57.20 58.71 19-24 years 9.98 12.01 11.16 Source: (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017) The number of schools, teachers and students are shown in Table 1-7. In 2016, elementary schools in West Manggarai Regency had a ratio of 14.83 student to teacher, which means approximately 15 students will be managed by 1 teacher. In Sano Nggoang Sub-district, the ratio of student to teacher at the elementary school level is 11.03, or 11 students to 1 teacher. Similar statistics are shown in Table 1-7 for junior high school and senior high school. Higher ratios of student to teacher indicate that class sizes are larger and there are more students per teacher or school. This can mean that there are fewer learning opportunities because schools or classrooms are overcrowded. A high ratio of student to classroom is not negative unless there are not enough teachers in the classroom. None of the ratios are high enough to indicate a poor educational environment. Table 1-7 Ratio of Student-Teacher, Teacher-School, and Student-School in Study Area Number Number Ratio of Ratio of Ratio of Number Study Area Education Level of of Student- Teacher- Student- of School Teacher Student Teacher School School West Elementary School 257 2,655 39,384 14.83 10.33 153.25 Manggarai Junior High School 85 1,283 8,556 6.67 15.09 100.66 Regency Senior High School 35 814 11,423 14.03 23.26 326.37 Sano Nggoang Elementary School 23 196 2,161 11.03 8.52 93.96 Sub-district Junior High School 8 100 651 6.51 12.50 81.38 Senior High School 4 65 579 8.91 16.25 144.75 Source: (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017) and (Central Bureau of Statistics of Sano Nggoang Sub-district, 2017) One of the barriers to education is the lack of outreach and access of education services, especially for underprivileged/poor communities or residents living in the rural areas and remote areas. This generates a low rate of school participation. In the study area, participation is low for secondary and higher education. As there are only 3 senior high schools in Sano Nggoang Sub-district and none in Wae Sano Village, Sano Nggoang Village and Pulau Nuncung Village; young people who want to continue to Senior High School or equivalent must leave their villages. Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-6 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study Source: (Sano Nggoang Sub-district, 2016) Figure 1-5 Working Population by Education Level in Study Area Figure 1-5 represents the education level of community in Wae Sano, Sano Nggoang, and Pulau Nuncung Villages. The average education level of the community working in the study area is Elementary School (Sekolah Dasar, SD) or equivalent. A Diploma IV or Bachelor was the highest education level of Sano Nggoang Village (33 people) and Pulau Nuncung Village (7 people) in 2015. 1.3.1.4 Community Welfare In 2016, West Manggarai Regency was 15th of 22 regencies in East Nusa Tenggara Province with respect to the Human Development Index (HDI) with a score of 60.63. This consists of life expectancy of 66.19, school life expectancy of 10.67, average school life expectancy 6.82 and capita income of IDR 7,149,000 per year (Central Bureau of Statistics of East Nusa Tenggara Province, 2017). 1.3.2 Socio-Economic 1.3.2.1 Regional Economic Gross Regional Domestic Product or GRDP (Produk Domestik Regional Bruto, PDRB) of West Manggarai Regency at current prices (Atas Dasar Harga Berlaku, ADHB) in 2016 was 2,651,081.7 million rupiahs (equal to USD 194,941,000), an increase from 2,342,289.08 million rupiahs (equal to USD 172,234,000) in the previous year. Meanwhile, GRDP at constant prices (Atas Dasar Harga Konstan, ADHK) in 2016 was 1,923,495.1 million rupiahs (equal to USD 141,439,000). As seen in Table 1-8, between 2012 and 2016, no major shifts in economic structure of West Manggarai were noted with regard to industry sector. The highest proportion of income in 2016 was produced by agriculture, forestry, and fishery sectors (42.12%), followed by government administration, defense, and compulsory social insurance (12.78%); construction sector (12.31%); while others were under 10%. The rate of economic growth in West Manggarai Regency increased from 4.45% in 2015 to 4.76% in 2016. The highest growth came from the accommodation and food and beverage services sector at 5.96% and the lowest growth occurred in the water supply, waste management and recycling services sector at 2.28%. The agricultural, forestry, and fishery sector which is the backbone of the economy in West Manggarai Regency only grew 0.23% (remained constant). Table 1-8 GRDP Growth Rate of West Manggarai Regency Based on Industry Sector, 2011-2015 (Percentage) Category Description 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 A Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishery 3.32 3.66 2.82 2.84 2.61 B Mining and Quarrying 4.95 5.68 6.13 6.60 5.68 C Manufacturing Industry 1.97 2.60 3.49 4.06 5.48 Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-7 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study Category Description 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 D Gas and Electricity Supply 5.49 3.61 18.22 10.77 13.78 E Water Supply, Waste 2.29 3.09 2.85 2.89 0.61 Management and Recycling F Construction 4.50 5.31 4.26 7.03 7.25 G Wholesale and Retail Trade; Car 6.69 7.38 5.46 6.05 6.24 and Motorcycle Repairs H Transportation and Warehousing 5.21 5.62 5.06 4.36 7.62 I Accommodation and Food and 5.97 6.87 7.63 6.25 12.21 Beverage Services J Information and Communication 2.79 3.43 5.49 5.19 6.29 K Financial and Insurance Services 3.58 3.47 4.28 3.54 5.98 L Real Estate 0.99 3.03 3.02 4.35 4.56 M, N Company Services 6.89 6.98 6.10 2.48 4.48 O Government Administration, 3.90 5.19 6.00 6.17 6.14 Defense, and Compulsory Social Insurance P Education Services 3.99 5.28 5.07 3.79 4.84 Q Health Services and Social 1.06 1.49 1.19 4490 7.67 Activity R,S,T,U Other Services 1.73 1.51 2.26 1.32 6.30 Source: (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017) 1.3.2.2 Livelihood As seen from Table 1-9, most of people in West Manggarai Regency work in the agricultural sector with more women than men working in this field. The next highest is the services sector, followed by trade/hotel restaurant sector. The data shows that there is no livelihood from electricity, gas and water sector for people in West Manggarai Regency. Table 1-9 Percentage of Population Aged 15 years or above Working in Main Job Area Main Job Area Male Female Total Agriculture 69.62 78.55 73.40 Mining and Quarrying 1.34 0.00 0.77 Manufacturing Industry 2.99 5.56 4.08 Electricity, Gas and Water 0.00 0.00 0.00 Construction 4.00 0.00 2.30 Trading, Hotel, and Restaurant 2.68 8.00 4.93 Transportation and 7.34 0.00 4.22 Communication Finance, Rental, and Company 1.54 0.32 1.02 Services Services 10.51 7.57 9.26 Total 100 100 100 Source: (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017) In villages surrounding Mbeliling Forest, such as in Sano Nggoang Sub-district, communities depend on farming for their livelihoods. Table 1-10 shows that Wae Sano, Sano Nggoang, and Pulau Nuncung Villages profiles are agriculturally dependent (92.98%). Table 1-10 Community Livelihood in Wae Sano Village, Sano Nggoang Village, and Pulau Nuncung Village in 2015 Village Total Percentage No Job Type Sano Pulau Wae Sano (people) (%) Nggoang Nuncung 1 Farmer 590 536 318 1,444 92.98 Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-8 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study Village Total Percentage No Job Type Sano Pulau Wae Sano (people) (%) Nggoang Nuncung 2 Government Employee 15 15 5 35 2.25 (PNS) 3 Retiree Government 2 0 0 2 0.13 Employee 4 Employee 11 18 7 36 2.32 5 Private 0 1 0 1 0.06 6 Driver 0 1 0 1 0.06 7 Village Office Staff 15 9 10 34 2.19 Total (Population) 633 580 340 1,553 100.00 Source: (Sano Nggoang Sub-district, 2016) A questionnaire distributed to affected villages identifies the livelihoods in Sano Nggoang Sub-district, as seen in Table 1-11. The data shows that 86.46% of heads of family in Wae Sano, Sano Nggoang, and Pulau Nuncung Villages are farmers. The rest are working in local government and the private sector, as well as entrepreneurs. Table 1-11 Community Livelihood in Sano Nggoang Sub-district (Study Area) Village Total Percentage No Job Type Sano Pulau Wae Sano (people) (%) Nggoang Nuncung 1 Not Answer 2 0 0 2 2.08 2 Farmer 36 21 26 83 86.46 3 Civil Servant 3 1 2 6 6.25 4 Private 3 0 0 3 3.13 5 Entrepreneur 1 0 0 1 1.04 6 Retired 1 0 0 1 1.04 Total (Population) 46 22 28 96 100 Source: Primary Data Results, 2016 As seen in Table 1-12, farming is also a main activity performed by the family members (non-head of family). From 96 respondents, 44.79% of people work as farmers, and the other working respondents have jobs in local government as civil servants and the private sector, as well as entrepreneurs. Table 1-12 Jobs of Family Members in Village (Study Area) Village Total Percentage No Job Type Sano Pulau Wae Sano (people) (%) Nggoang Nuncung 1 Not Answer 24 8 7 39 40.63 2 Farmer 14 11 18 43 44.79 3 Civil Servant 2 0 0 2 2.08 4 Private 4 3 2 9 9.38 5 Entrepreneur 1 0 1 2 2.08 6 Unskilled / daily labourer 1 0 0 1 1.04 Total (Population) 46 22 28 96 100 Source: Primary Data Results, 2016 In addition to their primary jobs, many community members in the study area also have a secondary income source. This occurs because they cannot fulfil all household needs if they just depend on one income source. In the study area approximately 36.5% of total respondents have a secondary livelihood (Table 1-13). The secondary activity is usually the same as the main activity, which is working in the agricultural sector. Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-9 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study Table 1-13 Secondary Livelihood in the Study Area Village Total Percentage No Job Type Sano Pulau Wae Sano (people) (%) Nggoang Nuncung 1 Not Answer 26 20 15 61 63.54 2 Farmer 11 0 1 12 12.50 3 Private 1 1 0 2 2.08 4 Entrepreneur 4 0 9 13 13.54 5 Breeder 1 0 0 1 1.04 6. Village staff 1 1 2 4 4.17 7. Taxibike (ojek) 1 0 0 1 1.04 8. Carpenter 0 0 1 1 1.04 9. Unskilled / daily labourer 1 0 0 1 1.04 Total (Population) 46 22 28 96 100 Source: Primary Data Results, 2016 1.3.2.3 Agricultural West Manggarai has areas covered by farm land and crop land. Based on Table 1-14, the total area of paddy in West Manggarai Regency in 2016 was about 36,361 ha, with productivity of a wet paddy at 5.79 ton/ha and dry paddy at 1.46 ton/ha. Sano Nggoang Sub-district has high output in the agricultural sector that contributes to West Manggarai Regency. Overall crop production is 12,597 tonnes produced from 3,170 ha of total plantation area in 2016. The most widely-produced palawija2 in this regency is cassava (9.81 tonnes/ha), similar to Sano Nggoang Sub- district with 9.58 tonnes/ha of cassava production. Some palawija in Sano Nggoang Sub-district were not produced in 2016 for unknown reasons, these include peanuts, soy beans, and green beans. Table 1-14 Total Plantation Area, Average Production of Paddy and Palawija by Type of Plants in Study Area West Manggarai Regency Sano Nggoang Sub-District Type of Plantation Total Average Total Average Production Production Plantation Production Plantation Production (tonnes) (tonnes) Area (ha) (ton/ha) Area (ha) (ton/ha) Wet Paddy 33,797 195,533 5.79 2,964 12,289 4.15 Dry Paddy 2,564 3,754 1.46 206 308 1.19 Corn 2,630 7,209 2.74 295 772 2.62 Cassava 762 7,474 9.81 175 1,677 9.58 Sweet Potato 262 1,949 7.44 21 170 8.09 Peanuts 1,026 10 0.01 0 0 0 Soybean 1,355 1,831 1.35 11 0 0 Green Beans 273 463 1.70 0 0 0 Source: (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017) In general, trees planted by the farmers are traditional agricultural trees and shrubs, such as candlenut, cashew, coffee, and clove. Candlenut is a superior commodity in villages located on the plateau, such as Sano Nggoang and Wae Sano Villages (Figure 1-6). Historically, the head of Sano Nggoang Village brought the first seed of candlenut in 1969. The first plantation occurred in 1980 and the plant bears fruit every year. The community will sell candlenut to collectors who come to the villages. Then, commodity travels to Ruteng before being sent to Surabaya. The largest farm plantation commodities in 2016, in both West Manggarai Regency and Sano Nggoang Sub- district area were coffee, candlenut and cocoa (Table 1-15). In Sano Nggoang, candlenut had the highest production in 2016 with 285.83 tonnes, this number was decreased compared to production in 2015 with 345.05 tonnes. 2 Palawija means subtitutions crops, which ususally consists of coarse grains, pulses, roots, and tuber (CGPRT) crops Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-10 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study Table 1-15 Total Plantation Area, Average Production of Farm by Type of Plants in Study Area West Manggarai Regency Sano Nggoang Sub-District Type of Plantation Total Total Production Production Plantation Plantation (tonnes) (tonnes) Area (ha) Area (ha) Coconut 1,130.78 282.29 156.55 60.58 Coffee 3,346.57 954.55 239.25 120.58 Clove 1,248.45 411.89 43.15 6.60 Cacao 1,730.24 451.69 143.99 49.38 Cashew 3,997.69 305.19 602.50 85.73 Candlenut 4,629.65 750.33 907.42 285.83 Kapok 603.58 52.26 98.50 29.55 Areca Nut 137.67 95.88 42.60 9.28 Vanilla 21.07 18.09 0 0 Source: (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017) Source: Primary data, 2016 Figure 1-6 Candlenut Surrounding Lake Sano Nggoang in Mbeiling Forest Area Source: Primary data, 2016 Figure 1-7 A Woman Drying Candlenut Crops Traditionally The community activity of farming is supported by the dry paddy field landscape surrounding the settlements in Lake Sano Nggoang, Wae Sano and Sano Nggoang Villages. Aside from candlenut, other plant communities include coconut trees, enau, vegetables, fruits, and seasonal fruits, such as banana, cassava, pineapple, and others. Land surrounding Lake Sano Nggoang is very fertile with many different plant species growing well in this area (Figure 1-8). Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-11 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study Source: Primary data, 2016 Figure 1-8 Vegetation Surrounding Lake Sano Nggoang According to monographic information on the land area in Sano Nggoang Sub-district in 2016, Sano Nggoang Village has the largest total area of functional wetland compared to other villages with annual cropping frequency of 111 times for 51 ha of land. Meanwhile, the total area of wetland in Pulau Nuncung Village is only 1 ha with only 1 times annual cropping. Dry land consists of yard, farm, field, swamp, temporary unused land, customary forest, country forest, and other areas. Total dry land in Wae Sano Village is about 4,560 ha, Sano Nggoang Village 2,216.85 ha and Pulau Nuncung Village 1,128 ha. The division of total dry land in each village in the study area can be seen in Table 1-16. Table 1-16 Total Wet and Dry Land in Wae Sano Village, Sano Nggoang Village, and Pulau Nuncung Village Type of Land Wae Sano Village Sano Nggoang Village Pulau Nuncung Village Wet Land Potential Land (ha) 0 34 0 Functional Land (ha) 11 51 1 Annual Cropping Frequency (ha) 1 Time 8 108 1 2 Times 3 3 0 Total 11 111 1 Dry Land Yard (ha) 20 18 6 Farm (ha) 253.85 253.85 81.25 Field (ha) 50 25 35 Swamp (ha) 262.50 0 0 Temporary Unused Land (ha) 400 500 250 Customary Forest (ha) 500 150 0 Public/Private/Country Forest 2,814.65 885 731.25 Plantation (ha) Other Dry Land (ha) 59 85 24.50 Source: (Sano Nggoang Sub-district, 2016) Livelihoods sourced from traditional plants require large areas. This necessity brings the community to use the forest as a plantation area using the lodok system. A Lodok area is farmed together with other extended family members, with equal distribution into polygons by drawing radial lines starting from the middle to the outside of area. The division line forms a pattern which looks like a spider web, the typical of this land tenure division in Flores is shown in Figure 1-9. The data on land use in Sano Nggoang Sub-district (Sano Nggoang Sub-district, 2016) mentions that most of the soil is used for grove forest and prairie. Accordingly, land uses consist of these following areas:  Resident area 119 ha  Paddy field with once a year harvest is 92 Hha  Paddy field with two times a year harvest 546 ha  Moor or field 994 ha  Plantation 294 ha Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-12 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study  Mixed plantation 1,552 ha  Converted forest 9,189 ha  Grove forest 20,466 ha  Others forest 46 ha  Brushwood and prairie 21,745 ha  Lake 474 ha Source: (www.liputan6.com, 2016) Figure 1-9 Typical of Land Tenure (Lingko) in Flores, East Nusa Tenggara 1.3.2.4 Animal Farming Based on data from BPS, the most numerous domestic livestock in West Manggarai is hens, with a total population of 119,448 in 2016, with 6.2% coming from Sano Nggoang Sub-district. Livestock owned by the community in the Sano Nggoang Sub-district includes cows, buffaloes and horses, while the small livestock population is 77% dominated by pigs. Further detail regarding livestock ownership (for large livestock, small livestock and poultry) is provided in Table 1-17. Table 1-17 the Population of Big Livestock, Small Livestock and Poultry in Study Area Big Livestock Small Livestock Poultry Study Area Domestic Duck/ Manila Cow Buffalo Horse Pig Goat Hen Duck West Manggarai 16,429 20,026 436 41,985 9,035 119,448 901 Regency Sano Nggoang Sub 361 2,207 172 1,824 559 7,459 254 District Wae Sano Village 9 116 36 217 101 232 3 Sano Nggoang 0 171 11 82 17 526 16 Village Pulau Nuncung 0 13 11 38 14 108 0 Village Source: (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017) 1.3.2.5 Forestry The forest area in West Manggarai in 2016 was 269,567.16 haha, a decrease from the previous year at 275,489.60 ha (Figure 1-10). The National Park of West Manggarai Regency is the largest forest area with total Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-13 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study area of 173,300 ha or 64.29% of the total forest in West Manggarai Regency. The regency has limited city forest with an area of only 5 ha. 0% 0% 1% Natural Reserve 14% National Park Protected Forest 7% Production Forest 14% Limited Production Forest 64% City Forest Other Forest Source: (Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Manggarai Barat, 2017) Figure 1-10 Total Forest Area by Its Function in West Manggarai Regency The largest engineered wood production in West Manggarai Regency in 2016 was mixed forest (Rimba campuran) of 4,145.86 m3 with an average production of 345.49 m3 per month. Other production woods are teak (1,588.77 m 3), mahogany (319.50 m3), candlenut wood (536.17 m3) and coconut wood (9.02 m 3) (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017). The forestry status in the project area (i.e. the Project Area of Interest and Area of Influence) is shown in the following table and Figure 1-11. Table 1-18 Forest Large Area Based on the Forestry Status Area of Interest Area of Influence No. Forest Status Large Area (Ha) Percentage (%) Large Area (Ha) Percentage (%) 1 Lake 216.4 14 508.1 20 2 Protected forest 48.8 3 63.3 2 3 APL (designated for 1,265.8 83 1,993.9 78 other uses) Total 1,531.1 100 2,565.3 100 Source: Primary data results, 2016 Utilization of Forest Area by the Community Blok Sesok forest is the forest area surrounding Lake Sano Nggoang (Figure 6-20 Mbeliling Landscape and Blok Sesok Protected Forest). Based on the profile data of Wae Sano Village (Wae Sano Village, 2014), the forest area in the village is 20,000 ha, consisting of 19,000 ha of state-owned forests, 918 haof indigenous/communal forests, 30 ha of sectoral institutions owned forest/agroforestry and 1,052 ha of private property. From the total area of 19,000 ha of state-owned forests, 18,000 ha is classified as protected3. Pulau Nuncung Village has a total forest area of 250 ha, consisting of 50 ha protected forest, 100 ha of community forest (hutan rakyat)4, 50 ha of customary forest (hutan adat)5 and 50 ha of natural forest6 (hutan alami) (Pulau Nuncung Village, 2014). In the traditional Manggarai community, by shifting cultivation, Lodok may be abandoned as cultivation area and are later re-planted as forest, which the Manggarai local language iscalled Puar. Puar in the perspective of Manggarai indigenous peoples is different with the definition forest under Law No. 41 of 1999 on Forestry. Forest is defined as a unit of ecosystem with biological natural resources dominated by trees in their natural environment, in which one and the other cannot be separated. The Puar concept of the Manggarai indigenous people in Mbeliling is an area that is not used as land for farming or other agricultural activities, and the 7 8 authorization is under the Tua Golo . By this definition, free land that was previously a lingko and is no longer 3 Protected forest is defined as forest areas which primarily function to protect life-support system by managing waterworks, preventing flood, controlling erosion, preventing seawater intrusion, and maintaining soil fertility. 4 Community forest (hutan rakyat) is defined as right forest area which is subjected to property rights according to GOI law No. 41/1999. 5 Customary forest (hutan adat) is defined as state forest areas located within the local customary law, has strong cultural values for local community, and is usually managed communally for the community interest according to GOI law No. 41/1999. 6 Natural forest (hutan asli) is defined as primary forest, untouch by human activities. 7 Tua Golo is an indigenous top leader in West Manggarai community leadership for a Golo (mountain). Golo is the lowest administrative system in West Manggarai in customary governance system. Currently, Golo-Golo already turned into the village since the New Order government (Orba) governs the village administration. 8 Lingko is a land which opened together in a circle form with the distribution system in the spider webs forms. Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-14 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study managed as a farm is called Puar. Thereby the forest from the perspective of the community is not an area dominated by trees, but some vacant land that was not managed for agriculture, of which the status is under the authority of the Tua Golo. In the traditional mechanisms, taking Puar contents for any purpose cannot be done freely; it must be authorized by a Tua Golo by using a customary mechanism called Tuak9 (local liqueur/wine). Even taking a stone which is used for a fence on a farm in a Puar requires the community to ask permission of the Tua Golo. Currently, the regulation is not implemented because customary functions are increasingly loosening in an increasingly complex and heterogeneous society. The mechanism of Tuak is the procedure of requesting the entire forest. Tuak contents are cigarettes, money and sopi as opening story in conveying the intention to Tua Golo. In making the decision, Tua Golo summoned Tua Batu in the golo he leads to deliberate the request of a family member who wishes to take away the contents of the puar. In the meeting, if the decision of the meeting gives permission, then koe can take the wood as needed, but if the decision does not give permission, then he should not take wood without permission. If he still takes the wood without the permission of Tua Golo, then Tua Golo is authorized to impose sanctions as a form of punishment. The sanctions may be in the form of customary sanctions as well as state legal sanctions, with criminal charges of theft. 9 Tuak Mechanism is a procedure for requesting forest contents by tuak. The content may consist of cigarettes, enough money or gin as the opening story in conveying the intent to the Tua Golo. In making decisions, the community will call the Tua Golo to lead the request of family members who wish to take the contents of Puar . Tuak brought is used for consumption at the meeting. During the meeting, a decision will be made. If the decision of the meeting was giving permission, then the Koe may take the wood in Puar limited to the minimum requirement. But if the decision does not give permission, that person should not take the timber without permission. If the person still took without permission from the Tua Golo, then the Tua Golo has the authority to impose sanctions as a form of punishment. The sanction could be a custom law or a state law on charges of criminal act of theft. Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-15 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study Figure 1-11 Waesano Forest Status Map Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-16 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study 1.3.2.6 Industry In 2016, the number of small industries and home industries in West Manggarai Regency had increased, although the total number is still relatively small. The number of small industries in 2016 increased by 4 new enterprises to 368 enterprises, while the home industries increased by 391 new enterprises to 1,474 enterprises. Increasing the number of new enterprises also affected the labor requirements. There was an increase in the number of workers including 10 people for small enterprises and 360 people in the home industries (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017). Most industrial enterprises located in West Manggarai Regency are agriculture and forestry including 755 business units with 1,435 workers in 2016. This number increased from 2015 about 741 business units with 1,403 workers. Economic Activity of Households The Government of Wae Sano has implemented an economic enhancement program for households by forming several business groups in 2010. The business groups are formed by considering business potential which can be developed in Wae Sano Village, based on the great potential of natural resources as well as lake tourism. Those groups are: 1. Travel Agent 2. Home Stay, 15 groups 3. Cultural Centers, 3 groups. For instance, Caci and Tetek Alu Dancing Group 4. Craft, woven hats (kopiah) groups, and woven fabrics. 5. Tour Guide 6. Tracking, to the top of savanna 7. Local Food Processing 8. Freshwater Fish Farmers 9. Local Liqueur (Tuak/Sofi) Industry Palm Tree. The community uses palm trees to produce sugar sap and fiber for roof material for housing (Figure 1-12). Source: Primary data, 2016 Figure 1-12 Utilization of Ijuk from Palm Tree for Roof Material Betel Leaves. Eating betel leaf (seen in Figure 1-13) is a community habit in East Nusa Tenggara. The betel from Wae Sano and Sano Nggoang Villages is well-known for its quality and is ordered by communities from other areas. Usually, betel is sold on market day at Werang Village, the capital of Sano Nggoang Sub-district. The betel is sold in bunches of 15 trunks, each bunch costing 1,000 rupiahs. This bunch is then tied in bundles of 15 bunches with each bundle costing 20,000 rupiahs (USD 1.50). Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-17 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study Source: Primary data, 2016 Figure 1-13 Many Betel Plants are Planted at Garden or Yard in Wae Sano Village Pandan Leaves. Many people in Wae Sano Village use pandan leaves to be wattled and made into several crafts, such as kopiah, a typical hat worn by Manggarai men to attend formal meetings. Pandan leaves are also used to make mats (Figure 1-14). Depending on the quality of the weave, Kopiah/hat prices range from 25,000 - 150,000 rupiahs (USD 1.88-11.28). Source: Primary data, 2016 Figure 1-14 Community Weaving Pandan Leaves Ikat Fabric (Songke). Ikat fabric produced by handcrafters in Wae Sano Village is well-known as Songke. In general, this fabric is produced by using a Manggarai design, called Songke Manggarai (Figure 1-15). Songke is usually used for the guest-welcoming ceremony in Wae Sano Village. Usually, Songke in the form of a scarf is laid around a guest’s neck as a welcoming gesture. Generally, women of Flores produce wide weaving scarves to be used as a blanket for men and a sarong for women. Songke of Manggarai is longer than a typical weaving sarong at 2 meters. Other than using it as a sarong which can be wound around the waist, women can use songke as kemben. In addition, headwear of Songke can be used in marriage cerimonies and for covering bodies. Songke fabric can be obtained directly from handicrafters in Wae Sano Village or on market day at Werang Village. The price of a Songke is in the range of 30,000 – 100,000 rupiahs (USD 2.26-7.50) for scarves and 200,000 – 500,000 rupiahs (USD 15.03-37.59) for sarongs. Songke also can be found at souvenir shops in Labuan Bajo. Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-18 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study Source: Primary data, 2016 Figure 1-15 Gedogan Weaving Tools and Several Pattern of Songke from Manggarai and Variation of Products (sarong, scarf, and cap) Bamboo. Many communities plant bamboo in their farms and typically use it for house walls. Many houses in Wae Sano Village and Sano Nggoang Village use bamboo for walls (Figure 1-16). Source: Primary data, 2016 Figure 1-16 Bamboo Trees Planted by Community and Used For House Walls Homestay There are many homestays in Wae Sano Village which are managed by the local people in a group, church, or individually. Total homestay groups in Wae Sano Village are approximately 15. The cost for staying in a homestay ranges from 100,000 – 350,000 rupiahs (USD 7.52-26.31) per person per night. 1.3.2.7 Others Potential Natural Resources In the study area there is a potential resource that can be utilized in the construction activities. Based on information from the Head of Wae Sano Village, potential construction materials are available in Wae Sano Village, such as brick in Dusun Nunang and Dusun Ta'al (owned by individuals). Rock and sand materials are available in the Dusun Nunang (owned by individuals). The sand and stones in Dusun Taal belong to the community while in Sano Nggoang Village it is owned by individuals. Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-19 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study Based on data from the Sano Nggoang Sub-district, the main potential quarrying material is sand and stone. In Wae Sano Village, the greatest quarry potential is ground rock located in the Dusun Ta'al. A complete overview of the quarry potential in Sano Nggoang Sub-district can be seen in Table 1-19. Table 1-19 Quarry Potential in Sano Nggoang Sub-district No Villages Location Type of C Quarry Note 1 Golo Mbu 1. Wae Weter Sand, stone No permit 2. Wae Racang Sand, stone No permit 2 Watu Panggal 1. Wae Weter Sand, stone No permit 3 Golo Manting 1. Wae Ose Paku Sand, stone No permit 4 Matawae 1. Wae Mese Naga Sand, stone No permit 5 Golo Kempo 1. Rambang Ground rock sand No permit 2. Compang Tanah Liat No permit 6 Nampar Macing 1. Wae Molang Sand, stone No permit 7 Golo Leleng 1. Wae Sapo Sand, stone No permit 2. Wae Longge Sand, stone Permit available/Floresco 8 Wae Sano 1. Taal Ground rock soil No permit Source: (Sano Nggoang Sub-district, 2016) 1.3.2.8 Ecotourism Tourism potential in Wae Sano10 can be developed to boost the local economy in the study area, in particular ecotourism such as described in the following and further the Figure 1-19 shows the tourism locations in surrounding Project location Lake Sano Nggoang11 Lake Sano Nggoang is located at Wae Sano village, Sano Nggoang Sub-district, West Manggarai Regency. This lake is the largest lake in East Nusa Tenggara and has ecotourism potential (Figure 1-17). The lake is the biggest volcanic lake in Eastern Indonesia and the water is clear green. It is located on Wae Sano volcano with an area of 513 ha, perimeter of 7.8 km and a depth of 600 m. It is located at an altitude of 750 m above sea level. This volcanic lake is situated in the southeast of Mbeliling Forest area and the Blok Sesok Forest. Mbeliling Forest itself plays an important role as a store and source of water for the surrounding areas including Labuan Bajo. Source: Primary data, 2016 Figure 1-17 Lake Sano Nggoang Rocks in this region consist of lava, breccia, agglomerate, and tephra formed from tuffaan volcanic acid or andesitic-basiltic rocks. In this lake there are Fumarole and Solfatara that produce heat in the lake water. In the list of Destination Data of Sano Nggoang Sub-district Tourism, the type of tourist attraction of Lake Sano Nggoang which has an area of 16 km2 is to enjoy the hot spring and sulfur, endemic birds and herbs medicine. 10 Wae Sano region (meaning in Manggarai language: water lake) covers an area around Lake Sano Nggoang (meaning in Manggarai language: smoldering or boiling lake), which consists of three villages: Wae Sano, Sano Nggoang and Pulau Nuncung 11 Lake’s coordinate: 809’- 8036’S, 122045- 122051’E Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-20 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study Lake Sano Nggoang is a source of sulfur, earth asphalt, salt, natural gas and petroleum. In this lake there are ducks, crabs and dragonflies live in. The lake can be used for drinking the pets (buffaloes and cows), horses and goats only. This lake is also the habitat of several species of birds, including Flores endemic birds, namely Flores Crow (Corvus florensis). It is recorded that there are several species of birds in the vicinity of lake, such as mountain ducks (Anas superciliosa), benjut duck (Anas gibberifrons), tesia timor (Tesia everetti), kipasan flores (Rhipidura diluta), white-tackled cekakak (Caridonax fulgidus), and others. Bird watching is an activity that tourists are interested in. Erwin Schmutz, a German priest, discovered and identified several species of trees and endemic birds in the Lake Sano Nggoang area. Schmutz who had lived in Nunang sub-village for 22 years until 1985 was considered a public figure by the people of Nunang. Blok Sesok Forest. Sesok is located in upper Nunang village, with the peaks and slopes of Poco Dedeng volcano reaching 1,230 meters above sea level. Sesok forest also offers a bird watching area where bird watchers can see water birds species that come to Lake Sano Nggoang and other species that inhabit the forest surrounding the lake. This forest is dominated by semi-preserved green tropical forest vegetation green. Wae Bobok. Wae Bobok is a hot spring located about 10 m to the east of Lake Sano Nggoang. It is used by the community in Wae Sano Village for daily baths. Tourists also use the warm water for bathing. Its condition is still natural and it has not been developed yet (Figure 1-18). Source: Primary data, 2016 Figure 1-18 Wae Bobok, Source of Hot Water near Lake Sano Nggoang Golo Dewa Peak. For cultural and religious tourism, tourists can visit a complex of old villages on the Golo Mblecek hills. This village is the village ancestor of the Nunang community that supposedly originated from the Minangkabau and was part of the Bima Kingdom. In addition, there is an old church on the banks of the lake which is the center of the first Catholic religion spread in Wae Sano Village and its surroundings. Pulau Nuncung Village. This village takes 45 minutes by walk to from Nunang Sub-village and is located west of Lake Sano Nggoang. Nuncung Island. This village is located on the west part of Lake Sano Nggoang, about 3 km or 45 minutes walking from Nunang Sub-village. Kamtis Stone, from the erupted volcano material. Other local attractions in the three affected villages have cultural and religious value for communities, including Nunang Church and Watu Nggoang (see Section 1.3.3.5 for more details). A full description of tourist destinations in Sano Nggoang Sub-district can be seen in Table 1-20. Table 1-20 Tourist Destinations in Sano Nggoang Sub-District Distance from Capital City of Road Condition No Tourism Object Location Attraction Sub-District to Location (Km) 1 Lake Sano Nunang sub-village, 65 1. a 100° C hot water Asphalt road Nggoang Wae Sano village 2. Medium hot water Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-21 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study Distance from Capital City of Road Condition No Tourism Object Location Attraction Sub-District to Location (Km) 3. area of 16 km 4. Tracking 5. Bird watching 2 Cunca Pinggong, Golo 50 Waterfall with a height of Asphalt road Rami/Waterfall Ndaring village about 250 meters 3 Cunca Lolos/ Tembel, Wae Lolos 50 Waterfall with a height of Ground path Waterfall village about 150 meters about 750 meters 4 Wae Bobok/ Pereng, Golo Mbu 55 Water overflowing above the Asphalt road Overflowing water village mountain peaks as high as about 7 m and the surrounding area is paddy fields 5 Cunca Wae Tahu/ Wae Munting, Nampar 100 Waterfall with a height of Ground path Waterfall Macing village about 250 meters about 750 meters 6 Burung Dewa Paku, Golo Manting 65 Bird species that are only Asphalt road Sano/Endemic Bird village found in Mbeliling forest 7 Cunca Murung/ Rami Rii, Poco Golo 50 Waterfall with a height of Ground path Waterfall Kempo village about 150 meters about 1 km 8 Watu Nggoang, Sano 65 In the years before 1970 this Asphalt road Nggoang/Lighted Nggoang village stone is lit up at night. Stone 9 Watu Panggal Daleng, Watu Panggal 50 Asphalt road village Source: (Sano Nggoang Sub-district, 2016) Tourism Infrastructure The distance from Labuan Bajo to Wae Sano is approximately 63 km, taking around 2-3 hours. It is accessible by both four-wheel-drive and two-wheel -drive vehicles. The tarmac road from Labuan Bajo City to Werang, the capital city of Sano Nggoang Sub-district is in good condition; from Werang to the lake the paved road is in much poorer condition. Wae Sano Village is connected by both main and access road. The length of the paved main road is 38 km long, at 5 m width. The length of the paved access road is 23 km, with a width of 2 m. The quality 12 of the access road, which is barely passable, is one of the obstacles for tourism development . Wae Sano village infrastructure for tourism is more developed than Sano Nggoang. Nunang Sub-village in Wae Sano is the centre of all Lake Sano Nggoang tourism activities. In this sub-village, tourists can get a homestay, 13 14 food and drink and a tour guide . Currently there are 12 homestays owned by both individual and community group in Nunang and three in Lempe Sub-village as the accommodation facilities. The most challenge for tourist development in the village is related to the electricity infrastructure; the houses that provide room for homestay use solar cell or generator for lighting at night. The village also has tourism business group covering homestay, processed food and drink, tracking, studio, woven handicrafts, poultry, bamboo crafts, fresh water fish, brown sugar processing, cashew nuts, medicinal plants, palm oil processing and clay handicrafts groups. Meanwhile, the development of ecotourism in Sano Nggoang Village is still limited; no homestay is available in the village, therefore no tourist stays in the village and none of the Sano Nggoang Village people work as a tour guide. Tourists usually just pass through this village as part of the trip walking around the lake. . A Village Ecotourism Institution has been established in Wae Sano Village to accommodate the interest and need of Wae Sano Village citizens to develop integrated ecotourism. This establishment was facilitated by Burung Indonesia, a non-government organization which is active in arranging various activities in the Wae Sano area and its surroundings. The members of this Village Ecotourism Institution are all community tourism businesses in 12 If accessibility to this area were better, the tourism pressure to this area would be high. However if the number of visitors from outside increases it might have negative effects on the ecosystem and the nature life. Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-22 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study Wae Sano Village. The village also has a tourism business group covering homestays, processed food and drink, tracking, studios, woven handicrafts, poultry, bamboo crafts, fresh water fish, brown sugar processing, cashew nuts, medicinal plants, palm oil processing and clay handicraft groups. Information and data on tourism is not well documented. The limited information gathered shows that the number of tourists from 2012 to 2014 showed a significant increase after decreasing in 2013 (Table 1-21). Table 1-21 Number of Visitors to Wae Sano No Year Number of Visitation % Increase/Decrease Visitation 1 2012 85 - 2 2013 76 -11 3 2014 271 71 Total 432 - Source: (Wae Sano Village Ecotourism Institution, 2014) Based on interview results, tourists came for recreation, enjoying the Lake Sano Nggaong scenery, bird watching, trekking to the peak of the mountain and enjoying the experience of living in a non-tourist location such as resident’s home and living life as a village person. The tourists stay ranged from 2 hours to two days / one night. The majority of tourists were two parties of two arriving by riding a motorcycle. The information on Sano Nggoang area is obtained by internet media or travel agent in Labuan Bajo. This area is a side destination before or after tourists visit Komodo Island. The motivation to travel are looking for tranquillity, increased knowledge and feeling the atmosphere of the countryside. The perception/opinion about nature tourism is the beautiful scenery, the calm atmosphere and the friendly community. Most of the visitors are first timers. The time to travel is usually a long holiday. The visitor expenditure is around Rp 195,000 (USD 14.64) per person15. The improvement of structure and infrastructure needed by the tourists include accommodation, access to paved road, public trashcans, public toilets and an increase in marketing. Tourism Enhancement Program Wae Sano Village in 2010 made tourism promotion programs for Lake Sano Nggoang in cooperation with the Ministry of Tourism with a grant of 75 million rupiahs and has been distributed to each group in the form of goods. In 2011 there was a grant of 100 million rupiahs that was delivered to each tourism provider group. To increase tourism to Lake Sano Nggoang in Wae Sano Village, the Governance and Ecotourism Institution was formed. The institution has been cooperating with the Wae Sano Village government in managing ecotourism with a profit sharing system, where 30% of revenues will be incorporated into the village treasury, 30% to institution treasury and 40% for conservation. The people who go to Lake Sano Nggoang will be charged 10,000 rupiahs (USD 0.75) per person. Based on interviews with the Culture and Tourism Agency of West Manggarai Regency in 2017, the program of increasing tourism in 2017-2018 in Wae Sano Village includes access road development along the 2 km to the Savana (location of bird ecotourism) near Lake Sano Nggoang. The land status for the access road during the UKL-UPL study is still in the land acquisition phase. In 2018, tourism development in Wae Sano Village had not become the main focus / program of West Manggarai Regency government; this is because approximately 90% of funds from the Culture and Tourism Agency will be focused on improving Batu Licin tourism in Labuan Bajo. 1.3.2.9 Public Amenities Access Road The road condition in the study area in Wae Sano and Sano Nggoang Villages is already paved, so that it can facilitate the accessibility of the public to get to / from the villages. Only Pulau Nuncung Village has an unpaved road. A complete description of roads in Sano Nggoang Sub-district can be seen in the following table. 15 Assuming the number of tourists in the coming year increased by 50% and the average expenditure per person is Rp 200.000, the income in 2015 and 2016 would Rp 81,300,000 and Rp 121,950,000 respectively Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-23 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study Table 1-22 Road Condition in Sano Nggoang Sub-District Road condition to capital village No Village Note Aspalt Telford Dirt Road 1 Mata Wae - 1 - Four (4) capital cities of village unreached of paved roads. 2 Wae Sano 1 - - 3 Sano Nggoang 1 - - 4 Golo Sengang - 1 - 5 Golo Mbu 1 - - 6 Golo Manting - 1 - 7 Golo Ndaring 1 - - 8 Golo Kempo 1 - - 9 Nampar Macing 1 - - 10 Golo Leleng 1 - - 11 Wae Lolos 1 - - 12 Pulau Nuncung - 1 - 13 Watu Panggal 1 - - 14 Golo Kondeng 1 - - 15 Poco Golo Kempo 1 - - Total 11 4 Source: (Sano Nggoang Sub-district, 2016) Market In order to meet the daily needs of the community, in Sano Nggoang Sub-district provides a weekly market that operates on certain days every week. For example in Werang Village (±5-6 km from study area) there is the Werang Inpres Market which operates every Saturday. In other villages the markets operate every Monday, Thursday and Tuesday. A complete overview of market infrastructure in Sano Nggoang Sub-district can be seen in the following table. Table 1-23 Weekly Market Facility in Sano Nggoang Sub-District No Market Name Location Schedule Description 1 Werang Inpres Werang, Golo Mbu Every Saturday - Parking area is not feasible (on ground) Market Village - Lack of supporting facilities - Less market activity 2 Indrong Regional Indrong, Golo Every Monday - Permanent Building Market Leleng Village 3 Leheng Regional Leheng, Golo Every Thursday - Heavily damage permanent building Market Sengang Village - Less support facilities - Less market activity 4 Naga Village Market Naga, Matawae Every Tuesday - Permanent building Village PNPM Program 5 KUD Sano Nggoang Werang, Golo Mbu - - Severely damaged permanent building Village - Severely damaged Fertilizer Warehouse - Types of savings and loan businesses and shops 6 BUMDES Bersama Werang, Golo Mbu - - Permanent building (ex PNPM Program). Village - Women’s group savings and loans Source: (Sano Nggoang Sub-district, 2016) Economic Institution Economic institutions comprise savings and credit groups, cooperatives, and joint business groups. Based on BPS data, in 2016 economic institutions in Sano Nggoang Sub-district includes 1 village unit cooperative (KUD) with 20 members, 5 savings and credits cooperatives (KSP) with a total of 432 members, 1 multipurpose Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-24 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study cooperative (KSU) with 31 members, 1 farmer cooperative with 63 members, and 2 combined farmer group (GAPOKTAN) with a total membership of 344 people (Central Bureau of Statistics of Sano Nggoang Sub-district, 2017). Most respondents surveyed in 2016 illustrate that all these economic institutions are still active and helpful to the community when experiencing cash difficulties for various needs. These economic institutions also help to buy various agricultural produce, especially candlenut and coffee. Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-25 Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study Figure 1-19 Tourism Locations Within the Area Surrounding the Project Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 1-26 Appendix F Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study 1.3.2.1 Women in Economy Women have a significant role in the household as can be seen from their primary involvement in agricultural activities such as candlenut harvesting and processing. Women also contribute to household income through small-scale home industries such as crafting from pandan leaves, weaving ikat fabric/ songket, and helping to manage homestays for tourists. The ESIA survey identified a number of concerns and expectations, including the expectation of improved electricity to support household activities, to have decent lighting, and to improve the local economy. Some of them have no concern about the project development but a few concerns are about the negative impacts from project development including disturbing the natural beauty of Lake Sano Nggoang. They are also afraid of fire during drilling activities. 1.3.2.2 Community Income and Expenditure The income level of a community is a measure of community welfare. Factors that may affect income education level, age, type of work, the level of ownership of household assets, family, and the distance from home to business premises. Data about community income in West Manggarai Regency was difficult to find. Household expenditure was used as a proxy to assess approximate levels of income. Grains Tubers Fish 14.28% Meat 33.42% 14.32% Egg & Milk Vegetables Nuts 1.37% Fruits Oils & Fats 1.68% 8.43% 0.76% Beverage Ingrediants 6.20% Spices 8.18% 2.78% Other Consumption 0.30% 2.77% Instant Food & Drink 2.99% 2.53% Cigarette (a) 3.94% 2.47% Housing 16.71% Miscellaneous Goods & Services 5.70% 52.89% Apparel & Footware 18.29% Durable Goods Taxes & Insurance Feast Purpose (b) Source: (Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Manggarai Barat, 2017) Figure 1-20 Percentage of Average Household Expenditure in a Month: Food Expenditure (a) and Non- Food (b) Expenditures As seen in Figure 1-20, the largest average expenditure of households in West Manggarai is food at 55%, while non-food expenditures are 45%. Based on statistical data, cigarette is included in the consumption goods in the food sector with an average expenditure quite high at around 14.28%. According to the population expenditure per month per capita (Figure 1-21), a total of 0.56% of the population expenditure in West Manggarai is between 150,000 to 199,999 rupiahs (USD 11.26 to 15.02) per month per capita which is very low and may be insufficient to meet the needs of daily life. In West Manggarai, population Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 27 Appendix F Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study groups with spending of 300,000 to 499,999 rupiahs (USD 22.52 to 37.54) per month per capita are the highest (39.28%). 0.00% 0.56% 7.90% 4.82% <150,000 14.07% 150,000-199,999 39.28% 200,000-299,999 300,000-499,999 33.36% 500,000-749,999 750,000-999,999 >1,000,000 Source: (Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Manggarai Barat, 2017) Figure 1-21 Percentage of Population by Expenditure Group per Month per Capita in West Manggarai Regency Based on the survey questionnaire with 96 heads/members of households in 2016, about 72 respondents (75%) have a household income of less than 500,000 rupiahs (USD 37.54) per month. Meanwhile, about 13 respondents (13.5%) had a household income in the range 500,000 (USD 37.54) to 1,000,000 rupiahs (USD 75.08) per month and the rest, 11 respondents (12.3%), had an income level above Rp 1,000,000 (USD 75.08). More information on household income level can be seen in Table 1-24. Table 1-24 Household Income per Month in Study Area Income (Rupiah/Month) Total Household No. Village <500.000 500.000 – 1.000.000 >1.000.000 1 Wae Sano 35 6 5 46 2 Sano Nggoang 13 5 4 22 3 Pulau Nuncung 24 2 2 28 Total 72 13 11 96 Percentage (%) 75.00 13.54 11.46 100 Source: Primary data results, 2016 The BPS set the food poverty line (FPL) in September 2015, and specifically for rural communities in West Manggarai Regency East Nusa Tenggara Province the FPL was 263,746 rupiahs (USD19.80) / month / capita. With an average number of household members of 4 people, 75% of households in the study area are below the food poverty line. In addition to the head of families, some family members also worked and earned money. Detailed information about the income of family members can be seen in Table 1-25. Table 1-25 Family Member Income per Month Income (Rupiah/Month) Total No. Village Do not answer <500,000 500.000 – 1.000.000 >1.000.000 Household 1 Wae Sano 24 15 4 3 46 2 Sano Nggoang 8 12 2 0 22 3 Pulau Nuncung 8 18 1 1 28 Total 40 45 7 4 96 Percentage (%) 41.67 46.88 7.29 4.17 100 Source: Primary data results, 2016 Analyzing the economic level of household conditions is more complete if both household income level and household expenditure levels are considered. By taking into account the household income and expenditure levels, the concepts of subjective poverty, absolute poverty and relative poverty can be assessed. Data on the household expenditure level per month is presented in Table 1-26. The data indicates that the percentage of the highest household expenditure level less than 500,000 rupiahs per month amounted to 36.46%, while the Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 28 Appendix F Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study expenditure level in the range of 500,000 to 1,000,000 rupiahs per month amounted to 31.25%. The remaining 15.63% of respondents spent more than 1,000,000 rupiahs per month. Table 1-26 Household Expenditure per Month Expenditure (Rupiah/Month) Total No. Village Do not answer <500,000 500.000 – 1.000.000 >1.000.000 Household 1 Wae Sano 10 18 15 3 46 2 Sano Nggoang 0 5 10 7 22 3 Pulau Nuncung 6 12 5 5 28 Total 16 35 30 15 96 Percentage (%) 16.67 36.46 31.25 15.63 100.00 Source: Primary data results, 2016 Regional Minimum wage (Upah Minimum Regional, UMR) in West Manggarai Regency in 2016 was about 1,425,000 rupiahs per month (equal to USD 104.78) or 17,100,000 rupiahs per year (equal to USD 1,257.41), compared to a Decent Standard of Living or DSL (Kebutuhan Hidup Layak, KHL) of 1,365,101 rupiahs16 (USD 100.38) (Central Bureau of Statistics of East Nusa Tenggara Province, 2017). This amount of DSL positioned West Manggarai Regency in 12th place out of 22 regencies in East Nusa Tenggara Province with North Timor Tengah having the highest DSL at 1,813,603 rupiahs per month. Table 1-24 and Table 1-26show that most respondents (54.17%) have income levels below the Regional Minimum Wage (UMR). A comparison between income and expenditure shows that some of respondents have higher expenditure than their income, indicating a negative cash flow each month. Respondent’s expenditures are largely for subsistence and other needs; Figure 1-22 shows that the largest amount is spent on food (60.05%). This condition illustrates that most household expenditures meet only primary needs. More information about household expenditure can be seen in Figure 1-22. Wae Sano Sano Nggoang Pulau Nuncung School Shelter and Clothing food Combination of food, clothing, and shelter 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Source: Primary data results, 2016 Figure 1-22 Household Expenditure in Study Area 1.3.2.3 Poverty According to BPS (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017), poor people are those who have an average expenditure per capita per month below the poverty line. In 2016, the number of poor people in West Manggarai Regency was 19.35% or 49,550 people with a poverty line of IDR 282,412 (USD 20.77) per capita per month. In Sano Nggoang Sub-district, the number of poor households (RTM) identified by BPS in 2015 was 1,571 households or about 6,284 people (with average 4 members per household in the Sano Nggoang Sub-district) and the number of very poor households (RTSM) was 158. 16 https://ntt.bps.go.id/linkTableDinamis/view/id/318 Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 29 Appendix F Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study In order to help the poor families, various social programs have been implemented in the community. According to results from the interviews with village officers and the community of Wae Sano, social activities that have been implemented in the community are as follows: • Beras Miskin Program (Raskin) program is routinely given to poor families. Raskin is a rice subsidy program for low-income households as a part of Government of Indonesia’s efforts to improve food security and social protection among targeted households17. • Kartu Indonesia Pintar (Indonesia Smart Cards) for poor children Smart Indonesia Card (KIP) is a programme that guarantees and ensures that all school -aged children from disadvantaged families receive financial assistance for education up to the completion of high school or vocational school18. • Kartu Perlindungan Sehat (Social Security Card) Health Indonesia Card (KIS) guarantees and ensures the provision of healthcare services to the disadvantaged, as implemented through the National Health Insurance (JKN), which was under The Health Care and Social Security Agency (BPJS) Health19. • Program Keluarga Harapan (Family Hope Program) Family Hope Programme (PKH) provides cash to very poor households. This type of programme is known globally as conditional cash transfers (CCT)20. In August 2016, the government distributed 263,430 kg Raskin to Sano Nggoang Sub-district, amounting to 92.98% of the RASKIN program target. Wae Sano, Sano Nggoang and Pulau Nuncung Villages have 134, 147 and 98 poor households, respectively. Each of the poor households was given 180 kg of rice (Sano Nggoang Sub-district, 2016). In addition, there were very poor families (RTSM) in Wae Sano Village and Sano Nggoang Village which amounted to 39 households and 7 households, respectively. Each very poor family in Wae Sano Village and Sano Nggoang Village were also given government program funds amounting to 1,972,756 rupiahs and 2,267,857 rupiahs, consecutively, through the Keluarga Harapan Program (PKH) (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017). Table 1-27 identifies the number of pre-prosperous and prosperous families in West Manggarai Regency and Sano Nggoang Sub-district. Overall, the number of pre-prosperous families in West Manggarai Regency in 2016 decreased significantly compared to the available data in 2014, which is 158 very poor families and 1,571 poor families. Conditions may have improved due to government poverty alleviation programs, such as Raskin. Table 1-27 Household Classification Prosperous Prosperous Study Area Pre-Prosperous Total Family 1 Family 2 West Manggarai Regency 10,266 34,417 7,766 52,449 Sano Nggoang Sub-district 683 2,156 754 3,593 Source: (Central Bureau of Statistics of East Nusa Tenggara Province, 2017) Note: - Pre-Prosperous Family: Family who has not been able to meet basic needs at a minimum, such as food, clothing, house, health, and religious teaching; - Prosperous Family 1: Family who has been able to meet basic needs at a minimum - Prosperous Family 2: Family who has been able to meet basic needs and psychological needs 17 http://www.tnp2k.go.id/en/frequently-asked-questions-faqs/cluster-i-2/subsidised-rice-for-the-poor-programme-raskin/ 18 http://www.tnp2k.go.id/en/programmes/programmes-to-create-productive-families/smart-indonesia-card/ 19 http://www.tnp2k.go.id/en/programmes/programmes-to-create-productive-families/healthy-indonesia-card/ 20 http://www.tnp2k.go.id/en/frequently-asked-questions-faqs/cluster-i-2/family-hope-programme-pkh/ Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 30 Appendix F Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study 1.3.3 Socio-Culture 1.3.3.1 Community History Community of West Manggarai Regency The Manggarai ethnic group primarily live in Manggarai Regency, West Manggarai Regency and East Manggarai Regency on Flores Island. The Manggarai people practice a patrilineal heritage structure, with the lineage inherited by the males. The Manggarai language consists of several dialects, these being Pae, Mabai, Rejong, Mbaen, Pota, Central Manggarai, East Manggarai and West Manggarai. The first four dialects are the languages 21 from a separate ethnic group that conforms to the Manggarai people in ancient times . At one time, Manggarai was a kingdom, the traditional zoning to the indigenous territories called dalu is a legacy of this time. At that time there were 39 dalu, and each dalu was dominated by one clan or wau. Each dalu 22 consists of several glarang and below it there are villages named beo. The people from the dominant wau controlled the dalu thought of themselves as aristocrats. Each dalu was subordinate to the king, and was led by a 23 kraeng. The kraeng was usually called a Kraeng Adak. Kraeng, and was also entitled Sangaji by the king. Different dalus often engaged in marriage alliances using a system called furnace marriage ( perkawinan tungku), a kind of cross-cousin marriage. The social stratification in the Manggarai community is clear with the existence of the dominant wau. First is the aristocrat class with the title of kraeng. Second is the commoner class named ata lahe. The third class is the slave class or mendi. In more recent times this social stratification is fading. The nuclear family in the Manggarai family system is called cak kilo. Some nuclear families then engage in patrilineal main family (limited extended family) named kilo. Several kilo from one ancestor emerged in a clan named panga. In recent times these panga are functioning as the source of the name of the kinship. In old times, these panga are still part of the big clan (wau). According to the Manggarai people, they need five main things to survive: a. mbaru bate kaeng, which is a place to live in b. uma bate duat, which is a garden/lingko as a livelihoods source c. wae bate teku, which is a water spring for drinking, bathing, washing and other activities d. natas bate labar, which is a collective large yard in the village used for a playground and to hold big rituals such as caci, sae kaba, etc. e. compang bate, which is an altar/mezbah that has been set by the ethnic group as the village spiritual centre that protect, provide, and arrange the ethnic group life sources ( naga beo/golo) Community of Mata Wae Tribe in Sano Nggoang Sub-district The community of Sano Nggoang Sub-district, especially in Wae Sano Village is referred to as Mata Wae community which is a sub-ethnic group of the Manggarai tribe. They are referred to as the Eye of Wae, which has a clear territory (hamente) which is derived from the Sano Ngoang region and its surroundings. In Wae Sano Village, the Mata Wae community is divided into three clans / families namely Lako, Nando and Dese. As for the kinship, territory, land and pattern of custom systems have no difference with the Manggarai tribe in general, the Mata Wae community has its own traditional dialect, a gesture which is different from other Manggarai people in Flores. There are three versions of the origin of Mata Wae ancestors, the first is said to be from Minangkabau (Minang- Sumatra), the second version is said to originate from Goa (South Sulawesi) and the third version is said that they came from Sumba Island. The general community of Wae Sano Village and Sano Nggoang Sub-district believe that the community of Mata Wae are not from the Manggarai tribe but are from Minangkabau descent. 21 http://suku-dunia.blogspot.co.id/2014/12/sejarah-suku-manggarai.html 22 Glarang reflects part of Dalu as special area which consists of a group of villages (http://www.sejarah-negara.com/suku- manggarai-di-flores-barat/) 23 Name like “Kraeng” and “Sangaji” are the influence from the Goa Kingdom (Sulawesi) and Bima (Sumbawa) that overpowered Manggarai in the Dutch colonialism. See Maribeth Erb, “Adat Revivalism in Western Flores”, in Jamie S. Davidson and David Henley (ed), The Revival of Tradition in Indonesian Politics’ the Deployment of Adat from Colonialism to Indigenism, Routledg e – Contemporary Southeast Asia Series, 2007 Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 31 Appendix F Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study The history of Mata Wae community originated from an area called Lampang which is an old village where the ancestors of the villagers of Wae Sano, Sano Nggoang and Pulau Nuncung settled for the first time. Lampang is located in the hilly area of Wae Sano Village north of Lake Sano Nggoang. Based on the results of interviews and focus group discussions (FGD) conducted in 2017 with community leaders in Dasak, Taal, and Lempe Kampung / Sub-villages as well as Wae Sano Village, it was discovered that all the people in the region came from the same ancestor - Lampang old village. The identity of local community of Wae Sano Village as Mata Wae is very strong as their identity base. For example, they acknowledge that as Mata Wae they have a special area called hamente mata wae, as their ancestor/ old kampong areas. In some stories they mentioned that they never left Sano Nggoang Sub-district and the surrounding areas. Thus, the area of Mata Wae's people is special in the area of Lake Sano Nggoang. The descendants of these ancestors are now divided into three clans, namely Lako, Nando and Dese that are spread in Wae Sano, Sano Nggoang and Pulau Nuncung Villages. Loko people mostly live in Sano Nggoang Village and Lempe Sub-village, and the Nando people live in Taal Sub-village. The Dese people are migrant community that married into the Wae Sano community. The identity of the community remains internal to the community, basing social position on history and marriage. Mythology The Manggarai people believe they are not natives from this island. This is noted by Robert Lawang (1989), Maribet Erb (1987), and Verheijen (1991). It is also recorded from the interviews with the village elder or Tu’a Golo in Wae Sano that claim their ancestors are from the Minangkabau ethnic group who came from the south island of Sumba, and then to Flores. They said their ancestors came to the area and met a group of local people in Lake Sano Nggoang, where they were married, and this spawned the current population of the area. It is difficult to prove whether they came from the Minangkabau tribe, who sailed and arrived in this region from Sumba. Further analysis proposes that they believe this because it strengthens the community to believe that they are part of a more advanced and better civilization, although told in the form of local myth there are groups of people who have lived in this Sano Nggoang region. The myths of the origin of their existence in this region at minimum prove that the local community is people who have lived in this region from generation to generation. As a traditional subsistence society, the Wae Sano community has experienced several migrations. From some old stories, it is told that their home village of Golo Lampang, as the oldest kampong, moved to some other areas, and settled in its current location. 1.3.3.2 Land in the Life of the Manggarai and Mata Wae Community In Manggarai culture, land is the mother, the source of life and provides the personal and community identities for the Manggarai people. Land is also a prerequisite to build a village. As such, for the Manggarai people, a conflict related to land is always a serious matter. In order to understand the community systems in Manggarai or in Wae Sano, we cannot separate it by just their cultural landscape. It is not only the land, but it is a cohesive system comprise of settlement, communities, natural environment, and the values that support it. In Manggarai culture, with and through land, a system is formed, rules and ethics are tied, solidarity is preserved and furthermore the life and all its aspects are cultivated. From this perspective, Manggarai people know the term ‘gendang one lingko pe’ang’ which means that Manggarai people do not only believe that village with its centre, mbaru gendang (drum house), is vital but also lingko, as soil and arable land for the people, is the source of life. In the lingko system, the land is divided equally by the village elderly or leaders to families who are deemed capable of managing and cultivating the land. The division of each plot of land to the families will form a spider web pattern, as seen in Figure 1-9. Lingko was formed when the Manggarai people moved from a nomadic lifestyle to a sedentary life, which required a residential area (beo – village). New settlements were obtained by clearing away the forest, a practice known as lingko. In each beo the number of lingko depends on the ability of citizens to clear away the nearby forested area, as well as the population of each beo. Each lingko has a different size and is given a unique name, often referring to natural features such as local plants or rivers. Where lingkos border a neighbouring lingko, a borderline (called a rahit) is implemented to define the ownership rights of each lingko. As seen through the initial process of an ownership of a lingko, it can be said that the lingko owner is the citizen of beo that is usually a member of one ethnic group genealogically. The elders, called tu’a teno, tu’a beo or tu,a Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 32 Appendix F Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study golo, are responsible for dividing lingko. Arrangements regarding lingko are made at the mbaru gendang (drum house). Lingko can be given as a gift to other beo to maintain harmonious relationships, for example as part of arranging a marriage between beo. Under national law, lingko is known as communal (customary) land and is thus owned by the local community. Likewise, lingko is formed by placing a piece of wood – teno - in the centre of the land area to be divided. The outer border of the lingko is formed by ‘pulling’ a straight line around the radius of the teno. The land at the centre of the lingko, known as moso, is split first. Land area awarded to residents is based on the population of the village and a person’s standing in the community hierarchy. For example community leaders and land owners usually will receive up to three times more land area than other community members. The division of lingko – known as the lodok system – where the land and cultivation system is integral to the neighborhood and settlement system called “golo”. The Manggarai people not only regard the land as a place for production or farming but they also see the land as part of the landscape that has its own autonomous power. They believe in the spirit or spirit that lives with them. Therefore, this form of reverence for the spirit on the land within their area is very strong in every aspect of their lives. The lodok system reflects the traditional layout of the Manggarai village dwellings. Pillar houses (mbrang niang) are built encircling a main central pillar, such that a circle is formed around the pillar ( Sri bonkok). This central pillar forms an alter and/or a place for offerings, such as at penti (New Year). The roof of the dwellings is cone shaped and made from palm tree or reed. The lodok system has similarity with mbaru niang (original house) structure and beo structure in Manggarai. Mbaru niang is a pillar house with eight pillars (siri leles), which encircle the main pillar (siri bongkok) which is one solid piece of wood (without any joint) forming a circle. Siri bongkok is the place to put offerings for the ancestors at ritual ceremonies, such as penti (New Year). The rooftop is cone-shaped made from the fibre of palm tree (wunut) or blady grass (ri’i). Houses were built encircling compang (stone staircase steps building) in the center of the village. Compang is the place to deliver offerings for beo citizens and functioning as a beo altar. 24 The lodok system of dividing the lingko starts from teno at the center of lingko, and pull a straight line (radius) until the lingko outer line as a border (langang). The splitting process is as follows: a piece of wood is placed at the center of the lingko, called teno. From this teno, a borderline is pulled and called as langang (soil borderline) until the outer line of lingko called cicing (lodok one cicing pe’ang). The land space at the center of the lingko is the moso (one finger) as the base for the first split. The space of the moso depends on the number of citizens as receivers in the lingko. The more number of receivers, the less moso received. The number of moso received by each person also depends on the person`s position in the beo. Citizens who are considered as leaders (tu’a beo, tu’a golo) or land owners (tu’a teno) usually get moso wase (three fingers) while other citizens would get moso biasa (one finger) or moso kina (one and a half finger). In the Manggarai custom, citizens that are entitled to receive lingko include: 1) native beo citizens from genealogical descent (one ethnic group) that are seen as the land owners in the village and the main heirs of the communal land; and 2) Migrants from other ethnic groups who are permanent residents of the local community due to marriage or other societal functions (e.g. teachers). Once a citizen receives lingko the ownership is passed on to heirs. Ownership of lingko enables citizens to have an automatic connection to customary practices and matters within the community. In the study area, the land was traditionally (pre-Indonesian independence) managed under tu’a golo authority. However, in line with the development era and laws development of Indonesia, particularly Agrarian law, the pattern of land ownership management in the study area is evolving from communal to more individual systems. The present role of the tu’a golo focusses on conflict resolution and customary rituals and / or ceremonies, such as the ‘ground breaking ceremony’ for developments. During the 1980s the land was divided with permanent ownership and cultivated land use. Nowadays, the land rights are permanently owned by individuals. For land or communal management, the current communal lands are part of the Adat land and are utilized by the public. There are 16 Ha of communal land under the Adat authority, of which 6 Ha are used for schools and churches and the remaining 10 Ha are uncultivated land located in Taal Sub-village. Based on the information collected from the interviews from the secretary of Wae Sano Village and several 24 Named teno because the pillar is taken from a tree named haju (tree) teno.Teno is the centre of lingko circle and further called as lodok (centerpoint). Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 33 Appendix F Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study village officers and custom leaders, the patterns of land ownership and land authorization in the study area almost all have become right to ownership. Proof of ownership of private land in the study area is mostly via payment receipts from the Land & Building Tax (L&B Tax) rather than land ownership certificates released by the National Land Agency (NLA). All lands affected by the exploration drilling area owned and managed by individuals and as such any negotiations will be with landowners, with the role of the tu’a golo being to witness the process. The role of tu’a golo currently is more related to the implementation of traditional rituals and resolving social conflicts between communities. Likewise, when there is physical development, such as houses, village offices, houses of worship and government buildings, tu'a golo are always present to lead the ceremony in the ground- breaking event. Data on land use in Sano Nggoang Sub-district is shown in Figure 1-23, showing that most land is grove forest. Resident Area Moor or Field 46 21,745 93 Plantation Mix Plantation 474 Covert Forest 639 Grove Forest 119 546 Sort of Forest 994 Brushwood and Prairie 20,466 294 Lake 9,189 1,552 Paddy Field (once a year harvest) Paddy Field (two times a year harvest) Source: (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017) Figure 1-23 Land Use in Sano Nggoang Sub-district (including Mbeliling Sub-district) 1.3.3.3 Land Status in the Study Area The project well pad drilling sites are located in several alternative locations in Wae Sano Village; the road upgrade plan for widening includes 3 villages in Sano Nggoang Sub-district and affects the Trans Flores Road. Based on observations and interviews with stakeholders in 2017, the background of land status for the project including ownership and socio-cultural conditions are described below and the detail information of land status can be referred to section 5.1 in Preliminary LARAP Document. Table 1-28 Land Status in the Study Area Area Location Land Status Well Pad A (WS-A) Well pad A is located in Lempe Sub-village  Based on interviews with the Tu’a Golo of about 1 km from the Wae Sano Village Office Lempe, the land ownership is private/  Phase 1: 0.57 Ha community/individually-owned property. Phase 2: 2.38 Ha  There is a cultural heritage (CH) area of Compang located near the well pad drilling location. The location is 150 m from settlements in Lempe Sub-village. Well Pad B (WS-B)  The Well pad B drilling site is located in  According to Wae Sano Village Head and Alternative locations Nunang Sub-village, Wae Sano Village Tu’a Golo of Nunang, the well pad B is include well pad B1 and  Well pad B1 is located around 260m East of located in the old village of the Nunang B4 well pad B, Sub-village (i.e. locally called as Kampung  Well pad B4 is located in Nunang Sub- Lingko). Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 34 Appendix F Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study Area Location Land Status  WS-B Phase 1: 0.68 village, Wae Sano Village about 300 meters  Some historical relics such as Compang Ha (South-West) from the Wae Sano Village and artefacts are found in the location.  WS-B Phase 2: 2.05 Ha Office.  The well pad B located approximately 80  WS-B1 Phase 2: 0.64 m away from settlements of Nunang Sub- Ha village.  WS-B4 Phase 2: 0.64  Well pad B1 is indicated located within the Ha protected forest area, based on the letter of Head of BPKH Region IV dated 1 March 2018. However this needs to be confirmed with the local forestry agency. Well pad B4 drilling pad is across an old village called Kampung Laja, located in Nunang and Lempe Sub-villages. Well Pad D (WS-D) Well pad D is located in Dasak Sub-village,  Well pad D is indicated located within the Wae Sano Village protected forest area, based on the letter  Phase 1: 1.03 Ha of Head of BPKH Region IV dated 1 Phase 2: 1.35 Ha March 2018. However this needs to be confirmed with the local forestry agency.  It is located in relative safe distance from the nearest settlement of Dasak Sub- village i.e. 150 m. Approximately 500 m to the south of the well pad drilling site, there is a customary area of the Wae Sano community namely Golo Lampang which is the first village of the ancestors of Mata Wae community. Well Pad E  Well pad E located in Taal Sub-village, Wae  Well pad E is private/ individually-owned Alternative locations Sano Village property include well pad E  The alternative well pad E is located  It is the location of ancient relics of the (alternative) between Taal and Dasak Sub-villages. Taal old village called Kampung Wewa. Based on a survey at the site, some old  WS-E Phase 1: 0.79 village relics were found, i.e. the Ha foundation stone of the building, former  WS-E Phase 2: 3.15 Ha hedge, settlement patterns and public  WS-E (Alternative) space (Nantas) patterns. Phase 1: 0.55 Ha In addition, about 300 m to the southwest of  WS-E (Alternative) the well pad boundary, there was a Phase 2: 1.37 Ha settlement and public cemetery of Taal Sub- village. Laydown Area Laydown area is located near well pad A 0.70 Ha Civil Contractor and Basecamps are located near well pad A Drilling Contractor Base Camp  Phase 1: 0.35 Ha  Phase 2: 0.53 Ha Spoil Disposal Area 1 Located near well pad D 1.05 Ha Spoil Disposal Area 2 Located near well pad E 1.61 Ha Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 35 Appendix F Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study Area Location Land Status Spoil Disposal Area 3 Located near well pad A 1.18 Ha Spoil Disposal Area 4-6 Along the proposed road widening area  Area 4: 0.54 Ha  Area 5: 0.37 Ha  Area 6: 0.50 Ha Drilling Water Supply No. Located near alternative well pad A 1 0.21 Ha Drilling Water Supply No. Located near alternative well pad E The Trans Flores road is managed/owned 2 by government; therefore it isn’t likely to have significant social issues. 0.24 Ha Widening of sharp bends Trans Flores National Road is the main road  Based on interviews with the Sano at a few locations on the from Labuan Bajo port before going south to Nggoang Sub-district Head, the road Trans Flores National the sub-district road of Sano Nggoang upgrade land area ownership status is Road between Labuan mostly private/ community/individually- Bajo Port and junction to owned property local public road (at  There was no significant social issues around KM30) found during the field survey in November 2017 0.04 Ha Source: Preliminary LARAP Site Visit, 22-30 November 2017 and Jacob’s Aerial Photography, 3 November 2017 1.3.3.4 The Traditional Custom of Manggarai and Mata Wae Community The Manggarai community is led by the tu’a golo, who has authority for all areas of the region including villages, land, forests and waterways. His subordinates are the tu’a beo (village leaders) and the tu’a teno, who is responsible for managing land related matters. The tu’a teno is elected by consensus from landowners. The main responsibilities of the Tu’a golo are: a. Working to ensure the security and safety of all areas and citizens b. To give mandates to Tu’a Mukang to divide the land to weki beo (village citizens) c. To give mandates to Tu’a Mukang to solve all problems occurring in the village, including land disputes in the first degree d. To solve all the problems that occur in the village at the highest level and final stages e. To lead customary ceremonies such as marriage, death, birth, ground breaking for a new building, welcoming official guests, opening a new agriculture field, etc. Tasks and roles of the Tu’a Mukang are: a. To help the Tu’a Golo distribute the land to the village citizens b. To help the Tu’a Golo in solving all problems that occur in the village including land disputes in the first degree c. As a mediator for the village citizens in solving all problems occurring in the village including land disputes in the first degree d. As a mediator between Tu’a Golo and village citizens. The majority of respondents stated that customary institutions in the study area (Wae Sano, Sano Nggoang and Pulau Nuncung Villages) still exist and are still performed their functions (Figure 1-24). Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 36 Appendix F Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study TU’A GOLO (Head of Sub-village) TU’A MUKANG TU’A MUKANG TU’A MUKANG (Head of Tribe / Clan) (Head of Tribe / Clan) (Head of Tribe / Clan) WEKI BEO (Sub-villagers) Source: Primary Data, 2017 Figure 1-24 Customary Institution Structure in the Study Area In the Wae Sano study area25, there are nine tu`a golo26 whom still performing their tasks and roles. The distribution of tu`a golo in Wae Sano is shown in Table 1-29. Table 1-29 the Distribution of Golo in the Study Area No Village Tu’a Golo 1 Wae Sano Nunang Lempe Ta’al/Wewar 2 Pulau Nuncung Lokong Kandang 3 Sano Nggoang Nggoang Lando Manuk/Golo Mbering Bokak Rangga Cowang Anak Source: Primary Data, 2017 According to the interviews with 97 respondents in the study area, the socio-cultural status in those communities is: 1) Customary activities in villages Usually the customary activities in the village surrounding Wae Sano includes marriage, death and building a new house/new building, while the customary ceremony is related to the agricultural cycle and is rarely held. Marriage ceremonies are usually held between the months of June to October, as these months are harvesting months, when more money is available in the community. Death ceremonies will be held when a person dies and is often without any preparation. Traditional and customary ceremonies are usually lead by a tu’a golo. In the past year, there were few intense conflicts in the three villages in the Wae Sano project area. Conflicts typically occur amongst the native community on the issue of land boundary and family matters. If a conflict occurs, the problem is usually solved in the family and customary institutions under tu’a golo authority. The 25 Wae Sano reflects the area surrounding Lake Sano Nggoang, consists of Wae Sano village, Sano Nggoang village and Pulau Nuncung village. 26 The distribution of golo had been done before the distribution of administrative was applied and sometimes the number is not equally with the distribution of government structure. For example, in Wae Sano village, administratively there are seven sub villages but only three golo; Sano Nggoang has three sub village and three golo with different names; Pulau Nuncung has four sub villages and two golo Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 37 Appendix F Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study friction is generally solved through Lonto Leok (consensus), with Manggarai customary ways, especially in solving land disputes. In the Lonto leok forum, the Manggarai customary and cultural symbols are used and in this forum the land dispute is pursued to be peacefully solved. It is rare for a conflict to not be resolved by customary institutions. 2) The active social institution in village Besides the traditional structure, other social institutions that have an effect on the community in the study area include religious groups, youth groups (Karang Taruna), and women’s groups (PKK). According to respondents, these social groups are still active in the villages. 27 The religious institution, in this case the Catholic Church (at the parish level and the structure underneath) and the government institution which is represented by the village government (the head of the village and its subordinates) have a large influence on the social life of community in the study are and its surrounding area. In the development of community activities in the study area, it was observed that the women’s role is not limited to domestic activities in the house, but includes active involvement in taking care of the community institutions in exist in the village28. 3) The active economic institution in village Economic institutions consist of saving and credit groups, cooperatives, joint business groups and others. Most of respondents confirmed that these economic institutions are still active and very helpful for the community when they are having cash difficulties. These economic institutions also help to buy and promote the variety of community agricultural products, especially candlenut and coffee. 4) Active voluntary activities carried out by the community in Wae Sano The community in Wae Sano is very active in participating in voluntary activities both for public interest and personal/family interests within village. Activities that are often carried out are religious services, family gatherings, cleaning the surrounding home complex, and mutual cooperation in processing of agricultural fields. 5) Frequent environmental cleaning activities This activity includes cleaning drainages and streets, waste management, and planting trees for security purposes. In residential areas, most domestic waste is organic waste such as dry leaves and unnecessary agricultural waste, while inorganic waste such as plastic containers is rarely found because the area is quite far from urban areas. 1.3.3.5 Cultural Heritage in Study Area The existing traditional custom and culture in the study area includes: a. The Manggarai traditional dance includes Caci Dance, Ndundu Ndake Dance, Tetek Alu Dance, Pacek Mawo Dance, Tuk Mawo Dance, Sanda Dance and Kiris Dance. Each traditional dance has its own meaning which has been told for generations and is still practiced and preserved. b. Tuak (palm wine): the traditional custom of drinking Tuak when a family wants to have a discussion in a traditional manner with other people, especially with a Tu’a Golo. This tradition also includes bringing cigarettes and money as offerings. c. Curu and kapu tradition: welcoming guests, respect and family concepts of the local community to tourists29 27 th The Catholic Church in Flores has a long history since the arrival of Dominican nuns from Portugal in Flores Timur in the 16 century. In Manggarai, the situation was different because this region was never visited by the Portuguese and was controlled th by the Gowa Kingdom and Bima Kingdom and converted to Islam since the early of the 17 century. The control was confirmed by Bongaya Treaty in 1667 between The Kingdom of Bima and the Dutch when the Dutch control the colonialism. The SVD missionaries opened a facility in Ruteng in the 1920s and started protecting the implementation of Muslim law and in 1928 the Dutch approved Manggarai to have a king selected by the people. Maribeth Erb, op cit. page 258 28 One of them is Maria Sumur Habur, the Head of Ecotourism Lake Sano Nggoang Institution. She is active in the establishment and management of the community institution since 2000 and at the previous village election (2016) she was proposed to be one of the candidates, but in the end she refused the offer. In-depth interview in Wae Sano Village, 4 October 2016 29 Curu is the welcoming guest tradition by parading them all the way to the house. At the house, the guests are welcomed by kapu tradition, which is welcoming by using a white rooster as a sign of sincerity and sense of family. To add the feast, palm wine also served, the signature drink to overcome thirsty and fatigue after a long trip. In the end of the procession, the guests are usually give money as an expression of prayer to God and to respect the ancestor spirit. Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 38 Appendix F Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study There are few remaining old buildings in the study area: a. The church and pastor`s house of Wae Sano parish, built from wood and located at the edge of Lake Sano Nggoang. This church is the center of the first spread of Catholic in Wae Sano Village and the surrounding area. b. The old village residence at the top of Golo Mbelecek Hill, on the east side of Nunang. This village is the Nunang`s ancestor village. According to the community, their ancestor is from Minangkabau and some of them came from Bima Kingdom. 30 c. Artefact compang and an old cemetery at Puncak Lampang; an old village of the Nunang citizens’ ancestors. d. Watu Nggoang in Dusun Nggoang, Sano Nggoang Village. Stones remain from an old village and the graves of Nggoang ancestors. Before 1970 the stone was believed to shine at night, but it no longer does so. Until this study was conducted, the area was still preserved and used as a place to deliver offerings to ancestors for some ceremonies or when a village citizen wants to live outside the village. Nggoang Sub-village people requested not to disturb or move the shrine for any reason because it is believed that that would cause unwanted problems. There are more sacred and historic sites found in the study area as described in Table 1-30. According to information obtained from interview with respondents in 2016, most of these places have been slowly abandoned by the community since 1965 in conjunction with the influence of the Catholic Church. This is because the Catholic teachings believe that such worship is idolatry and therefore it must be abandoned. The impact is that the current generation tends to regard these places as just historical but not sacred sites. However, most people want the places to be maintained. Table 1-30 Sacred Places in The Project Area No Village Name of Sacred Places Description 1 Wae Sano Lampang, Lingko Laja, and The first ancestral villages of the Wae Sano, Sano Nggoang Wewa Old Villages and Nuncung Island Villagers. Nekara and Compang Artefacts found in the old villages. 2 Sano Nggoang Nengkur Place to perform a ritual to ask the ancestors to rain in the event of a prolonged dry season. According to the respondents interviewed, this ritual was last done about a 12 years ago and the current generation has never performed it. Golo/Compang Hiher Location of an old village of Sano Nggoang. In this location, some Sano Nggoang villagers often give offerings to their ancestors when there is a need, for example consideration to wander or ask for healing from illness. Ndalo/Wae Owak Old village. Golo Wasekoe Location for performing rain rituals. Golo Tai Ntala Historic place as a stopover place for the ancestors of Parek villagers. Until now, there are people who give offerings to the ancestors here. Compang Lando Manuk Place to ask for power/strength when going to litigation or war with other parties as well as if someone wants to wander. 3 Pulau Nuncung Watu Pangkang Place of a ritual to eliminate the evil intentions of any outsiders entering the Kandang Sub-village. Kaka Mese The residence of aspirit guard or forest watchman. Sambinareng Place to ask for rain, but now it has been converted into a community garden. Golo Kalo Places to investigate any outsiders into the village as well as eliminate their evil intentions towards the residents in the village. Source: Primary Data, 2017 Settlements are marked inside the golo where there should be a drum or large traditional house for the golo, then the compang or stone or place of study, then there is the entrance and exit as a mark of kampong, and there 30 Compang is a place to put the sacrifice or used as an altar for the beo (village) citizens; usually placed in the centre of the beo Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 39 Appendix F Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study natas as public place. Later also, within the Wae Sano region itself as a territorial landscape Mata Wae found many old kampongs that have been abandoned, marked also with the former gardens and cemeteries that are still preserved and hereditary existence from generation to generation. Such as the former kampong of Golo Lampang, as the origin of all residents or clans in Wae Sano, then kampong Wewa which is the origin of Taal Sub-village community, and there is also kampong of former community in Sano Nggoang as well. The former land of kampong and its assets in it is maintained by the citizens up to now. It becomes a cultural resource of society as part of their cultural identity. The location of these physical cultural resource (PCR) locations within the study area is shown in Figure 1-25. Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 40 Appendix F Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study Figure 1-25 Physical Cultural Resources (PCR) within the Surrounding of Project Area Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 41 Appendix F Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study 1.3.3.6 Religion and Belief Aside from the traditional structure, other social institutions have had an effect on the Manggarai community including the Catholic Church. These three pillars influence the social life of Wae Sano citizens and the surrounding area. However, the traditional customary structure has continuously faded with the presence and roles of the church. This also resulted in the increased roles of women in the community as described above. Both in West Manggarai Regency and Sano Nggoang Sub-district, the Catholic religion is held by more than 74% of the population. Islam is the second largest faith in these areas. Other active religions are also shown in Table 1-31. Table 1-31 Number of Religion Adherents in Study Area, 2016 Religion Study Area Catholic Protestant Islam Hindu Buddhist West Manggarai Regency 210,326 2,064 57,597 232 12 Sano Nggoang Sub-district 10,726 19 3,622 0 0 Wae Sano Village 1,132 0 73 0 0 Sano Nggoang Village 840 0 248 0 0 Pulau Nuncung Village 560 0 50 0 0 Source: (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017); (Central Bureau of Statistics of Sano Nggoang Sub-district, 2017) Table 1-32 shows the type and number of worship facilities in the area. Even though the Moslem faith has the highest number of worship facilities, Catholics dominate the two areas and all sub-districts in West Manggarai Regency. Each village in the study area has 1 mosque. Wae Sano and Sano Nggoang Village has 1 and 2 churches respectively. Wae Sano Village is also equipped with a parish facility as the worship facility for Catholics (Sano Nggoang Sub-district, 2016). Table 1-32 Worship Facility in Study Area, 2016 Worship Facility Langgar Study Area Catholic Catholic Protestant Mosque Mushola (small Temple Church Chapel Church mushola) West Manggarai Regency 128 31 23 134 9 1 1 Sano Nggoang Sub-district 20 0 2 8 0 1 0 Source: (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017); (Central Bureau of Statistics of Sano Nggoang Sub-district, 2017) According to statistical data in 2017, religious leaders in Sano Nggoang Sub-district are Islamic and Catholic; protestant and Hindu followers in Sano Nggoang Sub-district have no religious leaders. Table 1-33 shows religions leaders in the project area. It shows that Islamic leaders in Sano Nggoang Sub-district in 2016 increased from about 8 people from 2015 to 56 people. Meanwhile, Catholic leaders in Sano Nggoang Sub-district increased significantly (fourfold) compare to the previous year. Table 1-33 Religious Leaders in Study Area, 2016 Study Area Religious Leaders West Manggarai Regency Sano Nggoang Sub-District Islamic Leaders Ulama 18 2 Imam of the mosque 134 20 Mubaliq 34 4 Khatib 134 20 Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 42 Appendix F Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study Study Area Religious Leaders West Manggarai Regency Sano Nggoang Sub-District Islamic counsellor 20 4 Islamic teacher 47 6 Catholic Leaders Bishop 1 0 Priest 44 3 Bruder 16 0 Nun 48 0 Catechist 216 9 Frater / brother 6 1 Protestant Leaders Pastor 8 0 Penatua (Elders or Lay Leader) 31 0 Deacons 5 0 Hindu Leaders Pinandita (priest) 1 0 Source: (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017); (Central Bureau of Statistics of Sano Nggoang Sub-district, 2017) 1.4 Community Health and Safety Component Community health status is one of the most important factors that can affect the productivity level of the community. Information regarding any health problem identified in the communty could help the Project in managing working conditions for its labours while providing more understanding in managing potential adverse impacts of the Project activities. Health information helps the Project to understand the current community health condition in relation to the potential impacts the community may be exposed to. 1.4.1 Health Status The Human development index (HDI) and life expectancy rate (LER) generally indicates the success level of a region’s economic and health development. High life expectancy shows good community health conditions, health knowledge and education levels, as well as good access to health services. In 2016, West Manggarai th Regency HDI was about 60.63, ranking 15 out of 22 regencies in East Nusa Tenggara Province. The LER of this regency is 66.82, school expectancy rate is 10.67, the school average rate 6.82, and expenditure per capita is IDR 7,149,000 (equal to approximately USD 529) per year (Central Bureau of Statistics of East Nusa Tenggara Province, 2017). According to Central Bureau of Statistics of East Nusa Tenggara from 2017, LER of this province in 2016 was 66.04. Other health indicators that could provide a general overview of community health condition are the infant birth and mortality numbers. High mortality numbers indicate poor community health conditions. In West Manggarai Regency 2017 data shows that there were 4,740 live born infants to 14 succumbing to infant mortality in 2016 (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017), this is show that the infant mortality is less than 1%. Data on community health status at the village level was not available at the time the ESIA survey was conducted, however information on disease concerns, health facilities and housing conditions in the following sections would help to better understand the current community health condition. 1.4.2 Disease Prevalence According to statistics of West Manggarai Regency in 2016, the diseases most suffered by the community are including Upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) and 22 myalgia (Figure 1-26). HIV/AIDS increased in West Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 43 Appendix F Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study Manggarai Regency by 8 patients from the previous year and sexually transmitted infections (STI) increased by 8 patients from the previous year 72 patients. Dengue Hemorrhargic Fever spreads significantly in West Manggarai Regency, and has been identified in 383 patients; this number almost triples in the cases in 2015. Disease prevalent in Sano Nggoang Sub-district in 2016 is not provided by BPS (Center of Statistic Bureau). Upper respiratory tract infection Myalgia 6% Gastritis 11% 5% 5% 4% Hypertension 3% Febrile observation 3% Skin allergies 22% 7% Diarrhea Acute Rheumatic Arthritis 3% Influenza 0% Dyspepsia 0% 37% HIV/AIDS 1% Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DBD) Source: (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017) Figure 1-26 Disease Cases in Study Area Health data at the village level on disease occurence was not availabe, however from consultation with the community in the three villages of Wae Sano, Sano Nggoang and Pulau Nuncung during the ESIA survey, it was identified that influenza, cough, and common fever were the most common illnesses in the community. There was no concern related to respiratory illness or STIs identified during the survey. 1.4.3 Health Facility The availability of adequate health facilities and qualified medical personnel is a key to enabler the success development in the health field (Table 1-34). Statistical data of West Manggarai Regency shows the integrated health center (Posyandu) and village health center (Poskesdes) is the main health facility for people to get treatment. The spread of active Posyandu units in each sub-district also plays an important role in dealing with health problems from an early age. By 2016, there were 2,085 active Posyandu units recorded in the West Manggarai Regency and as many as 9.83% are active cadres in Sano Nggoang Sub-district. West Manggarai Regency has two hospitals: West Manggarai Regional Public Hospital located on Labuan Bajo Street, East Nusa Tenggara Province; and Siloam private hospital, also located in Labuan Bajo. Both hospitals are prioritized communities in West Manggarai Regency. Health facilities in Sano Ngoang Sub-district are dominated by integrated health centers (Posyandu) (42 units) and village health centers (Poskesdes) (9 units). If the community of Sano Nggoang Sub-district is referred to a hospital, they must to go to Labuan Bajo for treatment at West Manggarai Regional Public Hospital. Table 1-34 Health Facilities in the Study Area, 2016 Mother and Puskes- Pos- Child Polin- Poskes- Study Area Hospital Pustu Clinic mas yandu Health des des Center West Manggarai Regency 2 18 NA 455 4 2 18 67 Sano Nggoang Sub-district 0 1 3 42 0 0 0 9 Wae Sano Village 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 Sano Nggoang Village 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 Pulau Nuncung Village 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 Source: (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017); (Central Bureau of Statistics of Sano Nggoang Sub-district, 2017) Note: NA= data is not available in BPS Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 44 Appendix F Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study There was 1 specialist doctor, 16 general practitioners and 6 dentists who worked in several community health centers (puskesmas) in West Manggarai Regency in 2016; other health workers include 369 nurses, 213 midwives, and 238 other medical personnel. In Sano Nggoang Sub-district, there is 1 general practitioner, 1 dentist, 15 nurses, 11 midwives, and 10 other medical personnel. In the villages in the study area, Wae Sano Village has 1 Pustu (auxiliary puskesmas) and 3 Posyandu (integrated health center); Sano Nggoang village has 2 Poskesdes (village health center) and 4 Posyandu; and Pulau Nuncung Village only has 2 Posyandu. There are 2 nurses in the Pustu of Wae Sano Village, and there are 1 nurse and 1 midwife in the Poskesdes of Sano Nggoang Village. Health insurance is available to Indonesian citizens. In West Manggarai Regency more than half of people already have health insurance (Figure 1-27). Jamkesmas/PBI 22.59% Healthcare Security (BPJS Kesehatan) 37.12% Social Security (BPJS Ketenagakerjaan) Jamkesda 36.57% Askes/Asabri/Jamsostek 1.45% 1.62% No Insurance 0.65% Source: (Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Manggarai Barat, 2017) Figure 1-27 People in West Manggarai Regency by Health Insurance Owned 1.4.4 Housing In 2016, West Manggarai statistical data (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017) showed that about 85.84% of housing status is private property. The second largest percentage is free lease status at approximately 8%. Only a small percentage of people stay in rent houses (4.2%). In densely populated urban areas where housing ownership can be a social issue and is often used to indicate levels of poverty, when a majority of the community is able to live their own homes, it can indicate a relatively good level of community welfare. Further information regarding community living condition should be considered to better understand the level of community welfare, such as availability of clean water, electricity and sanitation, as discussed in the following sections. 1.4.4.1 Residential Buildings Based on Statistic Center Bureau (BPS) data in 2016 (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017), the most common type of roof is a zinc roof at 96.28%; the rest are palm fiber/thatched roof t 1.71% and asbestos t 0.90. The most common type of wall is woven bamboo / wooden rod at 42.40%, followed by bamboo walls and brick walls respectively at 23.27% and 25.13%. The most common type of floor is cement at 56.50%, the rest have no floor/soil (25.03%), bamboo/wooden (10.89%), marble/ceramic (5.7%), parquet / vinyl / carpet / flooring (0.42%). 1.4.4.2 Clean Water Sources Clean water obtained by households in West Manggarai Regency is primarily from protected spring water at 39.66% and unprotected spring water at 17%. One of the mountain spring waters is called Golo Lampang which is widely used by the community for household needs. Others clean water sources are shown in Figure 1-28. Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 45 Appendix F Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study 0.04% 1.31% 6.43% bottled water 10.47% Water refills 14.59% 0.32% Tap water 17.00% 0.03% Tap water for sale 7.06% Drill/pump well Protected well Unprotected well 39.66% 3.09% Protected spring water Unprotected spring water Surface water Rain water Source: (Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Manggarai Barat, 2017) Figure 1-28 Drinking Water Sources in West Manggarai Regency The Waesano community primarily uses mountain spring water or Poco Dedeng which is channeled using pipes to residential areas. For people with high incomes, clean water sources from the pipeline will be pumped into a water tank for storage (Figure 1-29). Source: Primary Data, 2016 Figure 1-29 Clean Water from Golo Lampang (left) and Pumped Water into Water Tank 1.4.4.3 Electricity and Fuel Sources The most lighting used by households in West Manggarai Regency is electricity from PLN (State Electricity Company) at 47% (Figure 1-30)Error! Reference source not found.. There are still many people who use alternative light sources in the form of traditional lamps (pelita/sentir) or torches (about 34%). This is because PLN has not been able to reach the area or the population cannot afford to use electricity from PLN. 34% 47% PLN Electricity Non PLN Electricity 19% No Electricity Source: (Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Manggarai Barat, 2017) Figure 1-30 Lighting Source in West Manggarai Regency Another light source is SEHEN (Super Ekstra Hemat Energi) lamp or lamp that uses solar power, provided by PLN or other private companies (Figure 1-30). It may also come from individual generators. SEHEN lamps are actively used by the community but their use has begun to decrease due to the difficulty in charging batteries or for nonpaying customers. They usually charged for IDR 37,000 per month for a subscription to use the lamp and they pay IDR 3 million for installation per unit. Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 46 Appendix F Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study The current solar home system is not sufficient to provide electricity 24 hours a day. This limited electricity is used for domestic purposes only. No electric-based public utilities (i.e. public lighting, public telephone, etc.) are provided. Figure 1-31 Solar Home System for SEHEN Lamp In 2016, the use of wood as fuel was common in West Manggarai Renecy at about 85.14%, while users of kerosene were only 14.58%. Based on these conditions, there is a high expectation that the electricity generated from the Project during operation is distributed locally. 1.4.4.4 Household Disposal Another important facility for measuring welfare level is the ownership of a toilet, because it affects the health of the environment. In 2016, more than a half of households (55.34%) in West Manggarai Regency owned a toilet. Fecal landfills are still dominated by making holes and burying waste (about 49.92%), while 24.37% of people use tanks as fecal landfills and 21.14% of people choose to defecate on shore/vacant land/yard; the rest choose to defecate in ponds/paddy fields/rivers/lake/sea (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017). This is due to not having a toilet in their house. This reflects low awareness of community on health and environment sanitations. 1.4.5 Community Safety In 2016, the total traffic violations and accidents are 1,016 and 24 cases respectively. From the 24 traffic accidents, there were 19 victims died, 10 serious injured and 12 light injured. All victims died get compensation from PT Jasa Marga, a state-controlled toll road operator that constructs and provides toll road services in Indonesia. However, the financial loss in 2016 was almost twice higher than 2015. The following table presents the number of violation and accidents in West Manggarai from 2012 to 2016. Table 1-35 Number of Traffic Violations and Accidents in West Manggarai, 2012 - 2016 Financial Loss Total Traffic Death Serious Injured Light Injured Year Total Accident (in thousand Violation (person) (person) (person) rupiahs) 2012 3,073 24 8 39 24 176,450 2013 2,116 21 14 8 5 73,100 2014 3,889 28 9 14 23 92,250 2015 1,300 35 20 9 31 47,000 2016 1,016 24 19 10 12 82,650 Source: (Central Bureau of Statistics of West Manggarai Regency, 2017) Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 47 Appendix F Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study 1.5 Community Perception Community involvement during the development of the ESIA and UKL-UPL were as follows: th 1. Pre-Socialization on 15 September 2016 at Bintang Flores Hotel, Labuan Bajo, East Nusa Tenggara Province; rd 2. First Round of Public Consultation on 3 November 2016 at Wae Sano Village Office, Sano Nggoang Sub-district, including consultation during the Socio-Economic Baseline Survey; 3. Pre-Public Consultation Second Round and Participatory Social Mapping on March 2017 at Wae Sano, Sano Nggoang and Pulau Nuncung Villages; 4. Consultation with customary leaders and participatory mapping with the Wae Sano villagers as part of the community engagement in the initial project activities and as part of the initial baseline mapping related to site location, land status, customary and local cultural activities and community perceptions. Consultation activities with customary leaders and the community were conducted from 26th - 29th November 2017. The pre-socialization was held in order to familiarize the community with the Waesano Geothermal Exploration activity. Then, the first round of public consultation was held to communicate the Waesano Project description and potential environmental and social issues, to discuss the ESIA process and to capture the communities’ concerns about the project. Due to some gaps identified from the 1st round of consultation, another consultation session was conducted before the second round of stakeholder consultation which is planned to be conducted after the completion of ESIA. In addition to these, consultation with local communty was also conducted during the ESIA socio-economic baseline survey. Socio-economic interviews using a community perception questionnaire were conducted in November 2016 and March 2017. Of 96 respondents, most of them (85 respondents) agree to the project plan and about 8% and 3% respectively disagree and or did not answer, see Figure 1-32. 3% 8% Agree Not Answer Disagree 89% Source: Primary Data, November 2016 and March 2017 Figure 1-32 Community Feedback to the Project Electricity and lighting are the main reason for respondent to agree with the project. About 35% of respondents said they wanted to get decent lighting, about 7% want the existence of electricity to improve the local economy, and 26% said that electricity would support the needs of the community (include activities of the household). Respondents who disagree to the project plan (3%) have the perception that the project activity would pose a risk to the authenticity of Lake Sano Nggoang and its surrounding area. They were also afraid of the negative impacts caused by the project if there is no agreement between the proponent and the affected land owners. Responses and feedback are presented in Table 1-36. Table 1-36 Community Perception of the Project in the Study Area Number of No Response to Project Reason Respondents 1 Agree 85 - Improve community welfare, local economy, including household industries; - Electricity is needed by the community and provides many Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 48 Appendix F Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study Number of No Response to Project Reason Respondents advantages and supports household activities; - Facilitate access to information and many activities; - Geothermal electricity is environmentally friendly energy; - Have seen the study case of Ulumbu Manggarai Geothermal Power Plant; - Increase the advancement of Wae Sano Village and tourism in Lake Sano Nggoang - Job opportunities - Plenty of natural resources that cannot be managed by the local community - Reducing the Wae Sano volcanic activity - Save the use of petroleum 2 Disagree 8 - Activities will disturb the authenticity of Lake Sano Nggoang; - Communities are concerned about the risks of activities, such as explosions, air pollution, land and plantation disruptions and other impacts that may disrupt local people; - Do not interfere with community settlements. 3 Not Answer 3 - N/A Source: Primary Data, November 2016 and March 2017 Many respondents expressed concern that the project may lead to environmental pollution (15%), natural disasters and environmental damage (17%), and about 14% of respondents expressed fear of failure in the process of geothermal development. Environmental damage feared by the respondents refers to drilling activities that may impact the ecosystem balance, increase in the emergence of diseases, affect the beauty of the natural and local environment, or causing environmental pollution such as air pollution that will disrupt the community health (Figure 1-33). Failure in the process of geothermal development The project is done not by the experts The project endangers the community 14% 1% 26% The project interferes with private property rights 8% 1% The well pad drilling is done near the Lake Sano Nggoang 2% Environmental pollution 8% 15% Natural disaster and environmental damage 17% The occurence of fire during drilline 3% 3% Rejection from community to the project 2% The occurrence of community resettlement No concern No answer Source: Primary Data, November 2016 and March 2017 Figure 1-33 Community Concern to Waesano Geothermal Project As many as 33% of respondents expressed that they expected the project to succeed, and 11% of resepondents expect the project workers should be from the local area. They also expect that the project will improve the local economy. Other expectations are shown in Figure 1-34. Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 49 Appendix F Social, Economic, Cultural and Health Baseline Study The project runs safe and smooth The availability of electricity for people's lives Discounts or free of charge on electricity 3% 1% 3% 3% The government and community should cooperate 5% 8% 5% Improve the economic level of local communities 2% 6% 8% The project also contributes to the social interest of the 11% community The project is immediately realized and should not fail 11% The project should be environmentally friendly 33% Project workers should be from the local area No negative impact for community and environment 1% The project does not interfere with tourism The project does not interfere with community settlements The government is responsible for all community concerns No answer Source: Primary Data, November 2016 and March 2017 Figure 1-34 Community Expectation of the Waesano Geothermal Project Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 50 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) Appendix J Geology Map Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM J ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) Appendix K Sensitivity Map by Parameter Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM K 119°0'0"E 119°20'0"E 119°40'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°20'0"E 120°40'0"E 121°0'0"E 121°20'0"E Figure CLIENT - 7°40'0"S 7°40'0"S Map Title Disaster Prone Area Index Map Administrative Details Regency Manggarai Barat Province Nusa Tenggara Timur Scale Map Information 8°0'0"S 8°0'0"S µ Scale 1:1,000,000on A3 Paper 0.3 0.6 0 0.6 Kilometers Index Location 118° 0' 0"E 120 °0 '0 "E 122 °0 '0 "E 124 °0 '0 "E 8°20'0"S 8°20'0"S 8°0 '0 "S 8°0 '0 "S Kota Bima Bima Manggarai Timur 10° 0' 0"S 10° 0' 0"S Manggarai Barat Ngada 8°40'0"S 8°40'0"S Ende 12° 0' 0"S 12° 0' 0"S 118° 0' 0"E 120 °0 '0 "E 122 °0 '0 "E 124 °0 '0 "E Legend Project Location Disaster Prone Index 9°0'0"S 9°0'0"S High Medium 9°20'0"S 9°20'0"S Sumba Barat Data Sources 1. Site Visit Data (November 2016) 2. Wae Sano & Sanonggoang Village Map, BirdLife (2012) 3. Topographical Map of Indonesia scale 1:25.000, BIG (2001) 4. Disaster Prone Area Index Map, BNPB (2010) 9°40'0"S 9°40'0"S Map Information Sumba Timur Datum World Geodetic System 1984 Projection Universal Transverse Mercator Zone 50 South & 51 South Unit Meter Provided by Drawn : CF Date : April 2017 10°0'0"S 10°0'0"S PT AECOM Indo nesia Checked : ADW Project ID : JKTD17002 119°0'0"E 119°20'0"E 119°40'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°20'0"E 120°40'0"E 121°0'0"E 121°20'0"E 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E Figure CLIENT - Map Title 8°41'0"S 8°41'0"S Disaster Prone - Sensitivity Map Administrative Details SANO Regency Manggarai Barat NGGOANG Province Nusa Tenggara Timur VI LLAG E Scale Map Information Taal Sub-Village µ Scale 1:25,000 on A3 Paper 0.5 0.25 0 0.5 Poncengkalo Sub-Village Kilometers Index Location Wakar Sub-Village ! WS-E A 4 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E 1 A ! A ! Nggoang Sub-Village 8°0 '0 "S 8°0 '0 "S Dasak Sub-Village 8°42'0"S 8°42'0"S 2 A ! A' ! WS-D A 9°0 '0 "S 9°0 '0 "S SANO N G G OAN G A ! Angkor Sub-Village LAK E 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E Legend Proposed Wellpad (Nov 2016) Sensitivity A ! Medium A ! Proposed Wellpad (March 2017) P U LA U WAE SAN O NUNCUNG VI LLAG E Access Road 8°43'0"S 8°43'0"S VI LLAG E Indicative Village Boundary Lokong Sub-Village ! ! Area of Influence 3 Nunang Sub-Village Initial Area of Interest Waterbody 3'A Lama Ndajot Sub-Village ! ! WS-B A Settlement A ! Lenda Sub-Village Lempe Sub-Village ! WS-A A Data Sources Disaster prone sensitivity results is generated from classified the type of disaster prone data based on level of sensitivity by expert justification. Map Information Kandang Sub-Village Datum World Geodetic System 1984 8°44'0"S 8°44'0"S Projection Universal Transverse Mercator Zone 50 South & 51 South Unit Meter Provided by Drawn : RAP Date : Mar 2017 PT AECOM Indo nesia Checked : ADW Project ID : JKTD17002 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E 119°56'0"E 119°57'0"E 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E 120°2'0"E 120°3'0"E Figure CLIENT - 8°39'0"S 8°39'0"S Map Title FORESTRY STATUS Administrative Details Regency Manggarai Barat Province Nusa Tenggara Timur Scale Map Information 8°40'0"S 8°40'0"S µ Scale 1:50,000 on A3 Paper 0.5 0.25 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Kilometers Index Location 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E 8°41'0"S 8°41'0"S SANO 8°0 '0 "S 8°0 '0 "S NGGOANG VI LLAG E 4 1 ! WS-E A A !A! 8°42'0"S 8°42'0"S 2 9°0 '0 "S 9°0 '0 "S A ! A' ! WS-D SANO N G G OAN G A ! A 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E LAK E Legend Proposed Wellpad (Nov 2016) P U LA U A ! NUNCUNG 8°43'0"S 8°43'0"S VI LLAG E WAE SAN O A ! Proposed Wellpad (March 2017) 3 VI LLAG E 3' Access Road A! WS-B !A ! Area of Influence A Initial Area of Interest Settlement ! WS-A A Water Bodies Non Forestry Protected Forest 8°44'0"S 8°44'0"S Limited Production Forest Data Sources 1. Site Visit Data (November 2016 and March 2017) 2. Wae Sano & Sanonggoang Village Map, BirdLife (2012) 3. Deforestation Map - Directorate of Forestry Planning (2009-2011) 4. ESRI - Topographic Map Basemap Services 8°45'0"S 8°45'0"S Map Information Datum World Geodetic System 1984 Projection Universal Transverse Mercator Zone 50 South & 51 South Unit Meter Provided by Drawn : CF Date : April 2017 8°46'0"S 8°46'0"S PT AECOM Indo nesia Checked : ADW Project ID : JKTD17002 119°56'0"E 119°57'0"E 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E 120°2'0"E 120°3'0"E 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E Figure CLIENT - Map Title 8°41'0"S 8°41'0"S Forestry Status - Sensitivity Map Administrative Details SANO Regency Manggarai Barat NGGOANG Province Nusa Tenggara Timur VI LLAG E Scale Map Information Taal Sub-Village µ Scale 1:25,000 on A3 Paper 0.5 0.25 0 0.5 Poncengkalo Sub-Village Kilometers Index Location Wakar Sub-Village ! WS-E A 4 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E 1 A ! A ! Nggoang Sub-Village 8°0 '0 "S 8°0 '0 "S Dasak Sub-Village 8°42'0"S 8°42'0"S 2 A ! A' ! WS-D A 9°0 '0 "S 9°0 '0 "S SANO N G G OAN G A ! Angkor Sub-Village LAK E 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E Legend Proposed Wellpad (Nov 2016) Sensitivity A ! Low Proposed Wellpad (March 2017) P U LA U WAE SAN O A ! Medium NUNCUNG VI LLAG E Access Road High 8°43'0"S 8°43'0"S VI LLAG E Area of Influence Lokong Sub-Village ! ! Indicative Village Boundary 3 Nunang Sub-Village Initial Area of Interest Waterbody 3'A Lama Ndajot Sub-Village ! ! WS-B A Settlement A ! Lenda Sub-Village Lempe Sub-Village ! WS-A A Data Sources Forestry status sensitivity results is generated from classified the type of forestry status based on level of sensitivity by expert justification. Map Information Kandang Sub-Village Datum World Geodetic System 1984 8°44'0"S 8°44'0"S Projection Universal Transverse Mercator Zone 50 South & 51 South Unit Meter Provided by Drawn : RAP Date : Mar 2017 PT AECOM Indo nesia Checked : ADW Project ID : JKTD17002 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E Figure CLIENT - Map Title 8°41'0"S 8°41'0"S GEOLOGY Administrative Details Regency Manggarai Barat DESA Province Nusa Tenggara Timur SANO NGGOANG Scale Map Information Taal Sub-Village µ Scale 1:25,000 on A3 Paper 0.6 0.3 0 0.6 Poncengkalo Sub-Village Kilometers Index Location Wakar Sub-Village ! WS-E A 4 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E 1 A ! A ! Nggoang Sub-Village 8°0 '0 "S 8°0 '0 "S Dasak Sub-Village 8°42'0"S 8°42'0"S 2 A ! A' ! WS-D A 9°0 '0 "S 9°0 '0 "S SANO N G G OAN G A ! Angkor Sub-Village LAK E 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E Legend A ! Proposed Wellpad (Nov 2016) Proposed Wellpad (March 2017) DESA DESA A ! P U LA U WAE SAN O Indicative Village Boundary 8°43'0"S 8°43'0"S ! ! NUNCUNG Access Road Lokong Sub-Village Area of Influence 3 Nunang Sub-Village Initial Area of Interest Settlement 3'A Lama Ndajot Sub-Village ! ! WS-B A Geology A ! Waterbody Young Volcanic Product Old Volcanic Product Lenda Sub-Village Lempe Sub-Village ! WS-A A Data Sources 1. Site Visit Data (November 2016 and March 2017) 2. Wae Sano, Sanonggoang, & P.Nuncung Village Map, BirdLife (2012) 3. Topographical Map of Indonesia scale 1:25.000, BIG (2001) 4. Geologycal Map of Indonesia Komodo (1978) and Ruteng Sheet (1994) Map Information Kandang Sub-Village Datum World Geodetic System 1984 8°44'0"S 8°44'0"S Projection Universal Transverse Mercator Zone 50 South & 51 South Unit Meter Provided by Drawn : CF Date : April 2017 PT AECOM Indo nesia Checked : ADW Project ID : JKTD17002 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E Figure CLIENT - Map Title 8°41'0"S 8°41'0"S Geology - Sensitivity Map Administrative Details SANO Regency Manggarai Barat NGGOANG Province Nusa Tenggara Timur VI LLAG E Scale Map Information Taal Sub-Village µ Scale 1:25,000 on A3 Paper 0.5 0.25 0 0.5 Poncengkalo Sub-Village Kilometers Index Location Wakar Sub-Village ! WS-E A 4 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E 1 A ! A ! Nggoang Sub-Village 8°0 '0 "S 8°0 '0 "S Dasak Sub-Village 8°42'0"S 8°42'0"S 2 A ! A' ! WS-D A 9°0 '0 "S 9°0 '0 "S SANO N G G OAN G A ! Angkor Sub-Village LAK E 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E Legend Proposed Wellpad (Nov 2016) Sensitivity A ! Low Proposed Wellpad (March 2017) P U LA U WAE SAN O A ! Medium NUNCUNG VI LLAG E Access Road High 8°43'0"S 8°43'0"S VI LLAG E Indicative Village Boundary Lokong Sub-Village ! ! Area of Influence 3 Nunang Sub-Village Initial Area of Interest Waterbody 3'A Lama Ndajot Sub-Village ! ! WS-B A Settlement A ! Lenda Sub-Village Lempe Sub-Village ! WS-A A Data Sources Geology sensitivity results is generated from classified the type of geology formation based on level of sensitivity by expert justification. Map Information Kandang Sub-Village Datum World Geodetic System 1984 8°44'0"S 8°44'0"S Projection Universal Transverse Mercator Zone 50 South & 51 South Unit Meter Provided by Drawn : RAP Date : Mar 2017 PT AECOM Indo nesia Checked : ADW Project ID : JKTD17002 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E Figure CLIENT - Map Title 8°41'0"S 8°41'0"S HYDROGEOLOGY Administrative Details Regency Manggarai Barat DESA Province Nusa Tenggara Timur SANO NGGOANG Scale Map Information Taal Sub-Village µ Scale 1:25,000 on A3 Paper 0.6 0.3 0 0.6 Poncengkalo Sub-Village Kilometers Index Location Wakar Sub-Village ! WS-E A 4 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E 1 A ! A ! Nggoang Sub-Village 8°0 '0 "S 8°0 '0 "S Dasak Sub-Village 8°42'0"S 8°42'0"S 2 A ! A' ! WS-D A 9°0 '0 "S 9°0 '0 "S SANO N G G OAN G A ! Angkor Sub-Village LAK E 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E Legend A ! Proposed Wellpad (Nov 2016) Proposed Wellpad (March 2017) DESA DESA A ! P U LA U WAE SAN O Indicative Village Boundary 8°43'0"S 8°43'0"S ! ! NUNCUNG Access Road Lokong Sub-Village Area of Influence 3 Nunang Sub-Village Initial Area of Interest Settlement 3'A Lama Ndajot Sub-Village ! ! WS-B A Geohydrology A ! Waterbody Regions without exploitable groundwater Lenda Sub-Village Lempe Sub-Village Locally productive aquifers ! WS-A A Data Sources 1. Site Visit Data (November 2016 and March 2017) 2. Wae Sano, Sanonggoang, & P.Nuncung Village Map, BirdLife (2012) 3. Topographical Map of Indonesia scale 1:25.000, BIG (2001) 4. Hydrogeological Map of Indonesia Flores Sheet (1983) Map Information Kandang Sub-Village Datum World Geodetic System 1984 8°44'0"S 8°44'0"S Projection Universal Transverse Mercator Zone 50 South & 51 South Unit Meter Provided by Drawn : CF Date : April 2017 PT AECOM Indo nesia Checked : ADW Project ID : JKTD17002 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E Figure CLIENT - Map Title 8°41'0"S 8°41'0"S Hydrogeology - Sensitivity Map Administrative Details SANO Regency Manggarai Barat NGGOANG Province Nusa Tenggara Timur VI LLAG E Scale Map Information Taal Sub-Village µ Scale 1:25,000 on A3 Paper 0.5 0.25 0 0.5 Poncengkalo Sub-Village Kilometers Index Location Wakar Sub-Village ! WS-E A 4 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E 1 A ! A ! Nggoang Sub-Village 8°0 '0 "S 8°0 '0 "S Dasak Sub-Village 8°42'0"S 8°42'0"S 2 A ! A' ! WS-D A 9°0 '0 "S 9°0 '0 "S SANO N G G OAN G A ! Angkor Sub-Village LAK E 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E Legend Proposed Wellpad (Nov 2016) Sensitivity A ! Low Proposed Wellpad (March 2017) P U LA U WAE SAN O A ! Medium NUNCUNG VI LLAG E Access Road High 8°43'0"S 8°43'0"S VI LLAG E Indicative Village Boundary Lokong Sub-Village ! ! Area of Influence 3 Nunang Sub-Village Initial Area of Interest Waterbody 3'A Lama Ndajot Sub-Village ! ! WS-B A Settlement A ! Lenda Sub-Village Lempe Sub-Village ! WS-A A Data Sources Hydrogeology sensitivity results is generated from classified the type of hydrogeology formation based on level of sensitivity by expert justification. Map Information Kandang Sub-Village Datum World Geodetic System 1984 8°44'0"S 8°44'0"S Projection Universal Transverse Mercator Zone 50 South & 51 South Unit Meter Provided by Drawn : RAP Date : Mar 2017 PT AECOM Indo nesia Checked : ADW Project ID : JKTD17002 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E Figure CLIENT - Map Title 8°41'0"S 8°41'0"S HYDROLOGY Administrative Details SANO MA Wae Lempus Regency Manggarai Barat N G GOANG MA Wae Minak Province Nusa Tenggara Timur VI LLAG E MA Wae Pentawul MA Wae Heli Taal Sub-Village Scale Map Information µ MA Wae Wunis MA Wae Ndareng Scale 1:25,000 on A3 Paper 0.6 0.3 0 0.6 Poncengkalo Sub-Village Kilometers MA Wae Wakar Index Location Ma Wae Nara MA Wae Kerara Wakar Sub-Village ! WS-E A 4 MA Wae Cancor 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E 1 MA Wae Lenang MA Wae Mbelang A ! A ! MA Wae Mata Jua Nggoang Sub-Village MA Wae Roho MA Wae Ndiru MA Wae Bowor MA Wae Wesang MA Wae Heang MA Wae Ora MA Wae Gantong MA Wae Nampe 8°0 '0 "S 8°0 '0 "S MA Wae Wes MA Wae1 Buning 2 Dasak Sub-Village 8°42'0"S 8°42'0"S MA Wae Buning 2 A ! MA Wae Lolas A' ! WS-D A 9°0 '0 "S 9°0 '0 "S SANO N G G OAN G A ! LAK E MA Wae Kondong 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E MA Wae Cake Legend P U LA U NUNCUNG Proposed Wellpad (Nov Initial Area of Interest VI LLAG E A ! 2016) Area of Influence WAE SAN O Proposed Wellpad VI LLAG E A ! Settlement MA Wae Nduu (March 2017) 8°43'0"S 8°43'0"S MA Wae Lokong Waterbody Hot Water Spring Lokong Sub-Village MA Wae Jua ! MA Wae Bobok ! Water Spring 3 MA Wae Ras Nunang Sub-Village Access Road Lama Ndajot Sub-Village Indicative Village 3'A MA Wae Ajang ! ! WS-B A Boundary ! ! MA Wae Beel River MA Wae Kuta MA Wae Rowang A ! MA Wae Koe MA Wae Kembek MA Wae Litur MA Wae Lus 2 MA Wae Mberas Lempe Sub-Village MA Wae Lilo ! WS-A A Data Sources 1. Site Visit Data (November 2016) 2. Peta Desa Wae Sano & Sanonggoang, BirdLife (2012) 3. Peta Rupabumi Indonesia skala 1:25.000, BIG (2001) 4. ESRI - Openstreet Map Basemap Services MA Wae Pu'u Map Information Datum World Geodetic System 1984 8°44'0"S 8°44'0"S Projection Universal Transverse Mercator MA Wae Kondeng Zone 50 South & 51 South Unit Meter MA Wae Sau MA Wae Buning Provided by Drawn : CF Date : April 2017 PT AECOM Indo nesia Checked : ADW Project ID : JKTD17002 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E Figure CLIENT - Map Title 8°41'0"S 8°41'0"S Hydrology - Sensitivity Map Administrative Details SANO MA Wae Lempus Regency Manggarai Barat NGGOANG MA Wae Minak Province Nusa Tenggara Timur VI LLAG E MA Wae Pentawul Scale Map Information MA Wae Heli Taal Sub-Village µ MA Wae Wunis MA Wae Ndareng Scale 1:25,000 on A3 Paper 0.5 0.25 0 0.5 Poncengkalo Sub-Village Kilometers MA Wae Wakar Index Location Ma Wae Nara MA Wae Kerara Wakar Sub-Village ! WS-E A 4 MA Wae Cancor 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E 1 MA Wae Lenang MA Wae Mbelang A ! A ! MA Wae Roho MA Wae Ndiru MA Wae Bowor MA Wae Mata Jua Nggoang Sub-Village MA Wae Wesang MA Wae Heang MA Wae Ora MA Wae Gantong MA Wae Nampe 8°0 '0 "S 8°0 '0 "S MA Wae Wes MA Wae1 Buning 2 Dasak Sub-Village 8°42'0"S 8°42'0"S MA Wae Buning 2 A ! MA Wae Lolas A' ! WS-D A 9°0 '0 "S 9°0 '0 "S SANO N G G OAN G A ! Angkor Sub-Village LAK E MA Wae Kondong 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E MA Wae Cake Legend Proposed Wellpad (Nov 2016) Sensitivity A ! Low A ! Proposed Wellpad (March 2017) Medium P U LA U MA Wae Nduu WAE SAN O NUNCUNG VI LLAG E Access Road High 8°43'0"S 8°43'0"S MA Wae Lokong VI LLAG E MA Wae Jua Indicative Village Boundary Lokong Sub-Village ! ! MA Wae Bobok River 3 MA Wae Ras Nunang Sub-Village Area of Influence Initial Area of Interest 3'A Lama Ndajot Sub-Village MA Wae Ajang ! ! WS-B A MA Wae Beel Waterbody A MA Wae Kuta ! Settlement MA Wae Rowang MA Wae Koe MA Wae Kembek MA Wae Litur Lenda Sub-Village MA Wae Lus 2 MA Wae Mberas Lempe Sub-Village MA Wae Lilo ! WS-A A Data Sources Hydrology sensitivity is generated from geoprocessing the hydrology data using 'Buffer' tools in ArcGIS Software. Hydrology data includes river, lake, and waterspring. MA Wae Pu'u Map Information Kandang Sub-Village Datum World Geodetic System 1984 8°44'0"S 8°44'0"S Projection Universal Transverse Mercator MA Wae Kondeng Zone 50 South & 51 South Unit Meter MA Wae Sau MA Wae Buning Provided by Drawn : RAP Date : Mar 2017 PT AECOM Indo nesia Checked : ADW Project ID : JKTD17002 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E Figure CLIENT - Map Title 8°41'0"S 8°41'0"S LAND COVER Administrative Details Regency Manggarai Barat DESA Province Nusa Tenggara Timur SANO NGGOANG Scale Map Information Taal Sub-Village µ Scale 1:25,000 on A3 Paper 0.6 0.3 0 0.6 Poncengkalo Sub-Village Kilometers Index Location Wakar Sub-Village ! WS-E A 4 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E 1 A ! A ! Nggoang Sub-Village 8°0 '0 "S 8°0 '0 "S Dasak Sub-Village 8°42'0"S 8°42'0"S 2 A ! A' ! WS-D A 9°0 '0 "S 9°0 '0 "S SANO N G G OAN G A ! Angkor Sub-Village LAK E 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E Legend Paddy Field A ! Proposed Wellpad (Nov 2016) Forest A ! Proposed Wellpad (March 2017) Bushes Land DESA DESA P U LA U Savanna WAE SAN O Indicative Village Boundary 8°43'0"S 8°43'0"S ! ! NUNCUNG Access Road Settlement Lokong Sub-Village Area of Influence 3 Nunang Sub-Village Initial Area of Interest Waterbody 3'A Lama Ndajot Sub-Village ! ! WS-B A Crop Land A ! Farm Land Lenda Sub-Village Lempe Sub-Village ! WS-A A Data Sources 1. Site Visit Data (November 2016 and March 2017) 2. Wae Sano, Sanonggoang, & P.Nuncung Village Map, BirdLife (2012) 3. Topographical Map of Indonesia scale 1:25.000, BIG (2001) 4. ESRI - Openstreet Map Basemap Services Map Information Kandang Sub-Village Datum World Geodetic System 1984 8°44'0"S 8°44'0"S Projection Universal Transverse Mercator Zone 50 South & 51 South Unit Meter Provided by Drawn : CF Date : April 2017 PT AECOM Indo nesia Checked : ADW Project ID : JKTD17002 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E Figure CLIENT - Map Title 8°41'0"S 8°41'0"S Land Cover - Sensitivity Map Administrative Details SANO Regency Manggarai Barat NGGOANG Province Nusa Tenggara Timur VI LLAG E Scale Map Information Taal Sub-Village µ Scale 1:25,000 on A3 Paper 0.5 0.25 0 0.5 Poncengkalo Sub-Village Kilometers Index Location Wakar Sub-Village ! WS-E A 4 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E 1 A ! A ! Nggoang Sub-Village 8°0 '0 "S 8°0 '0 "S Dasak Sub-Village 8°42'0"S 8°42'0"S 2 A ! A' ! WS-D A 9°0 '0 "S 9°0 '0 "S SANO N G G OAN G A ! Angkor Sub-Village LAK E 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E Legend Proposed Wellpad (Nov 2016) Sensitivity A ! Low Proposed Wellpad (March 2017) P U LA U WAE SAN O A ! Medium NUNCUNG VI LLAG E Indicative Village Boundary High 8°43'0"S 8°43'0"S ! ! VI LLAG E Access Road Lokong Sub-Village Area of Influence 3 Nunang Sub-Village Initial Area of Interest Waterbody 3'A Lama Ndajot Sub-Village ! ! WS-B A Settlement A ! Lenda Sub-Village Lempe Sub-Village ! WS-A A Data Sources Land cover sensitivity results is generated from classified the type of land cover data based on level of sensitivity by expert justification. Map Information Kandang Sub-Village Datum World Geodetic System 1984 8°44'0"S 8°44'0"S Projection Universal Transverse Mercator Zone 50 South & 51 South Unit Meter Provided by Drawn : RAP Date : Mar 2017 PT AECOM Indo nesia Checked : ADW Project ID : JKTD17002 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E Figure CLIENT - ! ! ! Map Title ! ! 8°41'0"S 8°41'0"S & ! ö ! POTENTIAL SENSITIVE RECEPTOR ! ! k Administrative Details ! ! SANO ! ! k Regency Manggarai Barat k NGGOANG ! k ! ! Province Nusa Tenggara Timur ! ! VI LLAG E ! Scale Map Information ! ! Taal Sub-Village µ ! Scale 1:25,000 on A3 Paper ! ! 0.6 0.3 0 0.6 ! ! k! & " n Poncengkalo Sub-Village Kilometers ! ! ! Index Location ! ! & Sub-Village Wakar ! WS-E A 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E ! 4 1& ! ! ! & ! ! ! ! n A ! G! ! ! ! &! k A ! ! ! ! ! ! Nggoang ! Sub-Village ! ! ! ! ! î ! k ! k! ! ! !! ! 8°0 '0 "S 8°0 '0 "S ! !! & Dasak Sub-Village ! 8°42'0"S 8°42'0"S ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! ! A ! ! ! ! ! î !k ! ! ! k ! k A' ! WS-D A 9°0 '0 "S 9°0 '0 "S ! k SANO N G G OAN G A ! ! Angkor Sub-Village ! k LAK E ! 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E Legend ! k Hot Water Spring A ! Proposed wellpad (Nov 2016) ! ! Water Spring Proposed Wellpad (March 2017) P U LA U ! WAE SAN O A ! î ! Churc h Village Office NUNCUNG ! VI LLAG E Indicative Village Boundary ! n 8°43'0"S 8°43'0"S &! ö ! ! & VI LLAG E ! n ! ! & Access Road Cemetery Lokong Sub-Village ! n Initial Area of Interest ö ! Mosque ! k ! Area of Influence ! k Sacred Plac e ! ! G!k 3 Nunang Sub-Village Settlem ent ! G Health Fac ility k! ! î !! Lama Ndajot Sub-Village n 3' &!AA ! WS-B ! Waterbody k ! Elementary School High Sensitive Area k ! Junior High Sc hool ! A ! ! " n Village Land ! ! ! ! î Churc h Plan Lenda Sub-Village Mosque Plan Lempe Sub-Village ö ! ! k ! ! n Village Office Plan ! WS-A Data Sources ! A ! ! 1. Site Visit Data (November 2016 and March 2017) & 2. Wae Sano, Sanonggoang & P.Nuncung Village Map, BirdLife (2012) ! & 3. Topographicxal Map of Indonesia scale 1:25.000, BIG (2001) ! ! k ! 4. ESRI - Openstreet Map Basemap Services ! Map Information Kandang Sub-Village ! Datum World Geodetic System 1984 8°44'0"S 8°44'0"S ! ! Projection Universal Transverse Mercator ! Zone 50 South & 51 South ! ! Unit Meter ! ! ! ! ! Provided by Drawn : RAP Date : April 2017 ! ! ! PT AECOM Indo nesia Checked : ADW Project ID : JKTD17002 ! 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E Figure CLIENT - Map Title 8°41'0"S 8°41'0"S Sensitive Receptor - Sensitivity Map ! Administrative Details SANO MA Wae Lempus Regency Manggarai Barat NGGOANG Province Nusa Tenggara Timur VI LLAG E ! MA Wae Pentawul MA Wae Minak ! ! Scale Map Information ! MA Wae Heli Taal Sub-Village µ MA Wae Wunis ! MA Wae Ndareng Scale 1:25,000 on A3 Paper 0.5 0.25 0 0.5 ! Poncengkalo Sub-Village ! Kilometers ! MA Wae Wakar Index Location Ma Wae Nara MA Wae Kerara ! Wakar Sub-Village ! WS-E A 4 MA Wae Cancor 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E 1 ! MA Wae Lenang ! MA Wae Mbelang MA Wae Ndiru ! MA Wae Roho ! A ! ! A ! ! ! MA Wae Bowor Nggoang ! MA Wae Mata Jua Sub-Village ! ! MA Wae Wesang ! MA Wae Heang MA Wae Ora ! MA Wae Gantong MA Wae Nampe !! ! MA Wae Buning 2 8°0 '0 "S 8°0 '0 "S MA Wae Wes ! Dasak Sub-Village 8°42'0"S 8°42'0"S MA Wae Buning 1 2 A ! ! MA Wae Lolas A' ! WS-D A 9°0 '0 "S 9°0 '0 "S SANO N G G OAN G A ! ! Angkor Sub-Village LAK E MA Wae Kondong ! 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E MA Wae Cake Legend Church A ! Proposed Wellpad (Nov 2016) î ! ! n Village Office MA Wae Nduu A ! Proposed Wellpad (March 2017) & Cemetery P U LA U MA Wae Lokong ! WAE SAN O Indicative Village Boundary Mosque NUNCUNG ö ! VI LLAG E ! 8°43'0"S 8°43'0"S MA Wae Jua ! ! Sacred Place VI LLAG E ! ! Access Road ! k Lokong Sub-Village MA Wae Bobok Initial Area of Interest ! G Health Facility Area of Influence k ! Elementary School 3 ! MA Wae Ras Nunang Sub-Village Waterbody k ! Junior High School ! Village Land 3' A ! WS-B Lama Ndajot Sub-Village MA Wae Ajang ! Settlement " n ! A MA Wae Kuta ! MA Wae Beel Sensitivity ! î Church Plan ! MA Wae Rowang ! A ! Low ö ! Mosque Plan ! MA Wae Koe ! ! MA Wae Kembek Medium ! n Village Office Plan MA Wae Litur Lenda Sub-Village MA Wae Lus 2 Hot Water Spring Lempe Sub-Village High ! MA Wae Mberas ! ! Water Spring ! WS-A Data Sources ! MA Wae Lilo A Sensitive receptor sensitivity result is generated from geoprocessing the sensitivity receptor data using 'Buffer' tools in ArcGIS software. Sensitivity receptor includes settlement, ! water spring, school, village office, church, and health facilities. MA Wae Pu'u Map Information Kandang Sub-Village Datum World Geodetic System 1984 8°44'0"S 8°44'0"S ! Projection Universal Transverse Mercator MA Wae Kondeng Zone 50 South & 51 South ! Unit Meter MA Wae Sau ! MA Wae Buning Provided by Drawn : RAP Date : Jan 2017 PT AECOM Indo nesia Checked : ADW Project ID : JKTD17002 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E Figure CLIENT - Map Title 8°41'0"S 8°41'0"S SLOPE Administrative Details Regency Manggarai Barat SANO Province Nusa Tenggara Timur NGGOANG VI LLAG E Scale Map Information µ Taal Sub-Village Scale 1:25,000 on A3 Paper 0.6 0.3 0 0.6 Poncengkalo Sub-Village Kilometers Index Location ! WS-E A Wakar Sub-Village 4 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E 1 A ! A ! Nggoang Sub-Village 8°0 '0 "S 8°0 '0 "S 8°42'0"S 8°42'0"S Dasak Sub-Village 2 A ! A' ! WS-D A 9°0 '0 "S 9°0 '0 "S SANO N G G OAN G A ! LAK E 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E Legend P U LA U Proposed Wellpad (Nov 2016) Slope (Percent Rise) NUNCUNG A ! 0% - 5% VI LLAG E A ! Proposed Wellpad (March 2017) 5% - 10% WAE SAN O 10% - 30% VI LLAG E Indicative Village Boundary 8°43'0"S 8°43'0"S ! ! Access Road 30% - 100% Lokong Sub-Village Area of Influence 3 Initial Area of Interest Nunang Sub-Village Sano, Wai Waterbody Lama Ndajot Sub-Village 3' A ! ! WS-B A Settlement A ! Lempe Sub-Village ! WS-A A Data Sources 1. Site Visit Data (November 2016) 2. Wae Sano & Sanonggoang Village Map, BirdLife (2012) 3. Topographical Map of Indonesia scale 1:25.000, BIG (2001) 4. ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model (2011) Map Information Datum World Geodetic System 1984 8°44'0"S 8°44'0"S Projection Universal Transverse Mercator Zone 50 South & 51 South Unit Meter Poco Dedeng Provided by Golo Tewasano Drawn : CF Date : April 2017 PT AECOM Indo nesia Checked : ADW Project ID : JKTD17002 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E Figure CLIENT - Map Title 8°41'0"S 8°41'0"S Slope - Sensitivity Map Administrative Details SANO Regency Manggarai Barat NGGOANG Province Nusa Tenggara Timur VI LLAG E Scale Map Information Taal Sub-Village µ Scale 1:25,000 on A3 Paper 0.5 0.25 0 0.5 Poncengkalo Sub-Village Kilometers Index Location Wakar Sub-Village ! WS-E A 4 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E 1 A ! A ! Nggoang Sub-Village 8°0 '0 "S 8°0 '0 "S Dasak Sub-Village 8°42'0"S 8°42'0"S 2 A ! A' ! WS-D A 9°0 '0 "S 9°0 '0 "S SANO N G G OAN G A ! Angkor Sub-Village LAK E 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E Legend Proposed Wellpad (Nov 2016) Sensitivity A ! Low (0% - 15%) A ! Proposed Wellpad (March 2017) Medium (15% - 30%) P U LA U WAE SAN O NUNCUNG VI LLAG E Access Road High (>30%) 8°43'0"S 8°43'0"S VI LLAG E Indicative Village Boundary Lokong Sub-Village ! ! Area of Influence 3 Nunang Sub-Village Initial Area of Interest Waterbody 3'A Lama Ndajot Sub-Village ! ! WS-B A Settlement A ! Lenda Sub-Village Lempe Sub-Village ! WS-A A Data Sources Slope sensitivity result is generated from geoprocessing the topography data (AsterGDEM) using 'Slope Spatial Analysis' tools in ArcGIS software. Map Information Kandang Sub-Village Datum World Geodetic System 1984 8°44'0"S 8°44'0"S Projection Universal Transverse Mercator Zone 50 South & 51 South Unit Meter Provided by Drawn : RAP Date : Mar 2017 PT AECOM Indo nesia Checked : ADW Project ID : JKTD17002 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E Figure CLIENT - Map Title 8°41'0"S 8°41'0"S SPATIAL PLANNING Administrative Details Regency Manggarai Barat SANO Province Nusa Tenggara Timur NGGOANG VI LLAG E Scale Map Information µ Scale 1:25,000 on A3 Paper 0.6 0.3 0 0.6 Kilometers Index Location WS-E 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E 4 1 8°0 '0 "S 8°0 '0 "S 8°42'0"S 8°42'0"S 2 A' WS-D 9°0 '0 "S 9°0 '0 "S SANO N G G OAN G LAK E 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E Legend P U LA U Spatial Planning NUNCUNG A ! Proposed wellpad (Nov 2016) Waterbody VI LLAG E A ! Proposed Wellpad (March 2017) Residential WAE SAN O Agricultural area Indicative Village Boundary VI LLAG E 8°43'0"S 8°43'0"S ! ! Farm area Access Road Community forest Initial Area of Interest Limited production forest Area of Influence 3 Settlement Sano, Wai 3' WS-B WS-A Data Sources 1. Site Visit Data (November 2016) 2. Peta Desa Wae Sano & Sanonggoang, BirdLife (2012) 3. Peta Rupabumi Indonesia skala 1:25.000, BIG (2001) 4. Peta RTRW, Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Manggarai Barat NTT (2010) Map Information Datum World Geodetic System 1984 8°44'0"S 8°44'0"S Projection Universal Transverse Mercator Zone 50 South & 51 South Unit Meter Poco Dedeng Provided by Golo Tewasano Drawn : CF Date : May 2017 PT AECOM Indo nesia Checked : ADW Project ID : JKTD17002 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E Figure CLIENT - Map Title 8°41'0"S 8°41'0"S Spatial Planning - Sensitivity Map Administrative Details SANO Regency Manggarai Barat NGGOANG Province Nusa Tenggara Timur VI LLAG E Scale Map Information Taal Sub-Village µ Scale 1:25,000 on A3 Paper 0.5 0.25 0 0.5 Poncengkalo Sub-Village Kilometers Index Location Wakar Sub-Village ! WS-E A 4 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E 1 A ! A ! Nggoang Sub-Village 8°0 '0 "S 8°0 '0 "S Dasak Sub-Village 8°42'0"S 8°42'0"S 2 A ! A' ! WS-D A 9°0 '0 "S 9°0 '0 "S SANO N G G OAN G A ! Angkor Sub-Village LAK E 120 °0 '0 "E 121 °0 '0 "E Legend Proposed Wellpad (Nov 2016) Sensitivity A ! Low A ! Proposed Wellpad (March 2017) Medium P U LA U WAE SAN O NUNCUNG VI LLAG E Access Road High 8°43'0"S 8°43'0"S VI LLAG E Indicative Village Boundary Lokong Sub-Village ! ! Area of Influence 3 Nunang Sub-Village Initial Area of Interest Waterbody 3'A Lama Ndajot Sub-Village ! ! WS-B A Settlement A ! Lenda Sub-Village Lempe Sub-Village ! WS-A A Data Sources Spatial planning sensitivity result is generated from classified the type of spatial planning based on level of sensitivity by expert justification. Map Information Kandang Sub-Village Datum World Geodetic System 1984 8°44'0"S 8°44'0"S Projection Universal Transverse Mercator Zone 50 South & 51 South Unit Meter Provided by Drawn : RAP Date : Mar 2017 PT AECOM Indo nesia Checked : ADW Project ID : JKTD17002 119°58'0"E 119°59'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°1'0"E ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) Appendix L Preliminary LARAP Report Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM L Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) Waesano Geothermal Exploration Activity Wae Sano Village, Sano Nggoang Sub-District, West Manggarai Regency, East Nusa Tenggara Province PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Project number: JKTD17002 March 19 2018 Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Action Plan (LARAP) Project number: JKTD17002 Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Agni Nur Primitasari Kimberlee Myers Novianto Hadi Suwito Andrew Sembel Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 0 January 22 2018 1st Draft -signed- Andrew Sembel Project Director 1 March 19 2018 Final Andrew Sembel Project Director Distribution List # Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name 1 PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Action Plan (LARAP) Project number: JKTD17002 Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Prepared by: Agni Nur Primitasari E: AgniNur.Primitasari@aecom.com PT AECOM Indonesia South Quarter Building Tower-C 5th-floor Jl. R.A. Kartini Kav.8 Jakarta Selatan Jakarta - Indonesia aecom.com Printed on recycled paper notice. © 2018 PT AECOM Indonesia. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by PT AECOM Indonesia (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Action Plan (LARAP) Project number: JKTD17002 Abbreviation AJB Akta Jual Beli / sales-and-purchase deeds AMDAL Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan Hidup / Environmental Impact Assessment APBD Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah / Regional Budget APBN Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Nasional / State Budget APL Land Allocated for Other Purposes/non-forest area ATR Ministerial of Agrarian and Spatial Planning BAU Business-As-Usual BG Badan Geologi / Geological Unit BPN Badan Pertanahan Nasional / National Land Agency CH Cultural Heritage CSR Corporate Social Responsibility Ditjen EBTKE Directorate General of Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation DR Reforestation Fund ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan GEUDP Geothermal Energy Exploration Upstream Development Project GHG Greenhouse Gas GW Gigawatt IFC International Finance Corporation IMB Izin Mendirikan Bangunan / permit or letter of building construction IPPKH Izin Pinjam Pakai Kawasan Hutan / Forest Borrow-to-Use License KJPP Kantor Jasa Penilai Publik / Public Appraisal Office LAP Land Acquisition Plan LARAP Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan LAT Land Acquisition Team MA Mahkamah Agung / Supreme Court MAPPI Masyarakat Profesi Penilai Indonesia / Indonesian Society of Appraisers MEMR Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources MK Mahkamah Konsititusi / Constitutional Court MOF Ministry of Finance MOHA Ministry of Home Affairs NGO Non-Government Organization Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Action Plan (LARAP) Project number: JKTD17002 NTT East Nusa Tenggara OP/BP Operational / Bank Policy PAP Potentially / Project Affected People Perda Peraturan Daerah / Regional Regulation PNBP Non-Taxes of State Revenue PR Presidential Regulation PSDH Forest Resource Provision RPJMN National Medium Term Development Plan RPJPN National Long Term Development Plan SEP Stakeholder Engagement Plan SKPD Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah / Regional Work Units SMI PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) UKL-UPL Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup dan Upaya Pemantauan Lingkungan Hidup / Environmental Management and Monitoring Efforts WB World Bank Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Action Plan (LARAP) Project number: JKTD17002 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................ 8 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 10 1.1. BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2. OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................................................................. 10 1.3. METHODOLOGY AND APPROACH .................................................................................................................. 11 1.4. STUDY LIMITATIONS.................................................................................................................................... 11 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................ 12 2.1. OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................ 12 2.2. PROJECT LOCATION ................................................................................................................................... 12 2.3. LAND REQUIREMENTS FOR W ELL PAD DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORTING INFRASTRUCTURES ............................. 13 2.4. SUITABILITY WITH THE REGIONAL SPATIAL PLAN IN EAST NUSA TENGGARA PROVINCE ....................................... 15 3. REGULATIONS AND POLICIES FOR LAND ACQUISITION ....................... 18 3.1. LAW AND REGULATION FOR LAND ACQUISITION IN INDONESIA ......................................................................... 18 3.2. THE W ORLD BANK SAFEGUARDS POLICY ON LAND ACQUISITION AND INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT .................. 19 3.3. SMI GEUDP ESMF ON RESETTLEMENT POLICY ......................................................................................... 20 4. PROJECT LAND ACQUISITION PROCESS ................................................ 22 4.1. THE PROJECT POTENTIAL SCHEMES OF LAND ACQUISITION ........................................................................... 22 4.1.1. Land Lease ............................................................................................................................................. 22 4.1.2. Willing Buyer – Willing Seller Scheme .................................................................................................... 22 4.2. KEY PRINCIPLES FOR GOVERNMENT ACQUISITION PROCESS OF LAND FOR PUBLIC INTERESTS .......................... 23 4.3. PLANNING AND PREPARATION STAGE ........................................................................................................... 25 4.3.1. Public Notification ................................................................................................................................... 25 4.3.2. Initial Inventory ........................................................................................................................................ 25 4.3.3. Public Consultation ................................................................................................................................. 25 4.3.4. Establishment of Location ....................................................................................................................... 26 4.4. IMPLEMENTATION STAGE ............................................................................................................................. 26 4.5. COMPLETION REPORT SUBMISSION STAGE ................................................................................................... 28 4.6. COMPENSATION APPRAISAL ........................................................................................................................ 28 4.6.1. Government Valuation for Compensation ............................................................................................... 28 4.6.2. Full Replacement Cost and Livelihood Restoration ................................................................................ 29 4.7. ELIGIBILITY FOR LAND COMPENSATION ......................................................................................................... 30 4.7.1. Eligibility Criteria of the Project Affected People (PAP) ........................................................................... 30 4.7.2. Vulnerable People and Gender Considerations ...................................................................................... 30 4.8. ENTITLEMENT FRAMEWORK ........................................................................................................................ 31 4.9. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION ......................................................................................... 35 4.9.1. Historical Engagement Activities ............................................................................................................. 35 4.9.2. On-going and Future Engagement ......................................................................................................... 36 4.9.3. Grievance Management.......................................................................................................................... 37 4.10. TIME SCHEDULE ........................................................................................................................................ 38 4.10.1. Cut-off Date ............................................................................................................................................ 38 4.10.2. The Project Schedule for Land Acquisition ............................................................................................. 38 5. SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF THE PAP AND LAND TENURE ............ 40 5.1. OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................ 40 5.2. LAND TENURE WITHIN THE PROJECT FOOTPRINT ........................................................................................... 40 5.3. LIVELIHOOD OF THE PAP ............................................................................................................................ 47 6. ORGANISATIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES .................................................... 48 7. COST AND BUDGET .................................................................................... 49 7.1. COMPENSATION COST ................................................................................................................................ 49 Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Action Plan (LARAP) Project number: JKTD17002 7.1.1. Estimated Compensation for Well Pad Area and Its Supporting Facility ................................................. 49 7.1.2. Estimated Compensation for Road Widening Area ................................................................................. 49 7.2. LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION BUDGET ............................................................................................................ 50 7.3. BUDGET PLANNING .................................................................................................................................... 50 8. MONITORING AND REPORTING ................................................................ 53 9. BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................... 54 Figures Figure 2-1 The Project Proposed Land Acquisition Area ....................................................................................... 16 Figure 2-2 Forest Status of the Project Proposed Land Acquisition area .............................................................. 17 Figure 4-1 Land Acquisition and Resettlement Process (Based on Law Number 2/2012 and PR Number 71/2012)24 Figure 4-2 Grievance Redress Mechanism ........................................................................................................... 38 Figure 5-1 Land Cover of the Project Proposed Land Acquisition Area................................................................. 45 Figure 5-2 PCR Location in the Proposed Land Acquisition Area ......................................................................... 46 Tables Table 2-1 Land Requirement ................................................................................................................................. 14 Table 4-1 Entitlements Matrix for Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project (Based on GEUDP ESMF) ............. 32 Table 4-2 Historical Stakeholder Engagement Relevant to Land Acquisition ........................................................ 35 Table 4-3 On-going and Future Stakeholder Engagement .................................................................................... 36 Table 4-4 Land Acquisition Schedule .................................................................................................................... 38 Table 5-1 Land Tenure within the Project Exploration Area ................................................................................... 42 Table 6-1 Roles and Responsibility of the Project Land Acquisition Process ........................................................ 48 Table 7-1 Assumption for Land Purchase Compensation ...................................................................................... 49 Table 7-2 Land Acquisition Budget Planning ......................................................................................................... 50 Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Action Plan (LARAP) Executive Summary This document presents the Preliminary (Abbreviated) Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (Preliminary LARAP) for PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (SMI) proposed Waesano geothermal exploration activities in West Manggarai Regency, East Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia (hereafter referred as “the Project”). The write -up reflects the land acquisition implementation plan/procedures specifically for the Waesano Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project’s land acquisition process. This document will be treated as a living document with the method potentially updated to better fit the Project future development including adding socio-economics condition of each of the affected people and their households. The methodology to obtain information regarding land tenure of the potentially affected area included in this document is based on rapid assessment survey and interview with several key stakeholders including Head of Sano Nggoang Sub -district, Head of Wae Sano Village, and customary leaders, to seek information regarding land tenure system and land owners without direct interview and socio-economics survey of PAPs to avoid potential issue raised for land acquisition process that will start in 2018. The Project is administratively located at Wae Sano Village in Sano Nggoang Sub -district, West Manggarai Regency, East Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia. Exploration activities will require land for the development of exploration well pads, laydown and project auxiliary areas, and access roads widening. The land acquisition process will be completed prior to the land clearing activity. The status of ownership for each of the land parcels that will be acquired by the Project will be confirmed once the Project survey and civil design is finalised. Since the exact locations for some of the Project facilities have not been confirmed at the time this Preliminary LARAP is developed, the document could only present general land use and ownership info within the Project area of influence (AoI). The Project is still in the planning phase and layouts and operations may change according to the ongoing evaluation. In the previous Project Description received by AECOM in November 2016, the Project was planning for 6 well pads including Well pad 1, 2, 3, 3’, 4, and A’. AECOM has issued a Land Acquisition Conclusion and Recommendation Report on May 2017 to provide general guideline of land acquisition for these well pads locations, based on survey to the proposed well pad locations. However due to changes in the Project Description received in 27 October and 3 November 2017, and considering the GEUDP ESMF requirements for the development of Abbreviated LARAP for the Project, this Preliminary (Abbreviated) LARAP is developed focusing on the recent proposed design (which includes new locations of well pad A, B, D, and E) provided to AECOM prior to the additional field survey to the new proposed locations. In addition, as has been described earlier in Section 1.4, this report also included the 3 new alternative well pads (of WS-B1, WS-B-4, and WS-E (Alternative)) were planned in 22 December 2017. SMI’s land acquisition objective is to provide land procurement which complies with the Indonesia law and regulations pertaining to acquisition of land for public interests, as well as adhering to the World Bank policy on land acquisition and resettlement. This document outlines the Project and its need for land acquisition, the policy and guideline including potential scheme for land acquisition process using two options of “Lease to Purchase Agreement” for the main Project facilities area (i.e. well pad and its supporting facilities) and “Purchase Agreement’ for the access road widening. The proposed guideline expresses SMI’s values and policies specific for the Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project, which may differ for the exploitation phase. The proposed land acquisition will be conducted in stages, includes the following process combining the applicable national regulations and international standards:  Planning and preparation stage, including disclosure of the Project plan for land acquisition, consultation with the potentially affected people (PAP), and establish location;  Implementation stage, including development of the detailed land acquisition plan with confirmed schedule and budget, inventory of all potentially affected assets and socio -economic data of the affected people/household, and appraisal for compensation;  Compensation appraisal, including full replacement cost;  Eligibility for land compensation;  Stakeholder engagement and mechanism for objection/ grievance mechanism; Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 8 Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Action Plan (LARAP)  Cut-off date mechanism; and  Completion report submission stage. Generally, land area within the Project footprint is owned individually by local community of Mata Wae, sub-ethnic of Manggaraian people. Tu’a Golo, a village traditional leader, takes control of land tenure in Manggarai including in Wae Sano Village. The land ownership of Manggaraian Community is generally known as Lodok, where the land and cultivation system is integral to the neighborhood and settlement system called Golo. The Golo has its own production system and land use scheme called lingko. In the lingko system, the land is divided equally in the form a spider web pattern. Nowadays, the land rights are permanently owned by individuals. However, some of the proposed Project footprints are identified as culturally sensitive area requires further consultation with the customary leader and family clan of the land owner. With regards to community livelihood, based on observation and interviews with local communities during this Preliminary LARAP study, it was identified that the majority of the interviewed households are working as farmers as their primary livelihood. The land use within the proposed Project area is predominated by commercial crops such as candlenut, areca nut, coffee. To sustain livelihoods, communities are also engaged in small -scale land- related activities generally for secondary income sources (i.e. small retail shops, homestays, raising chickens and ducks, other animal husbandry). These indicate community alternative source of income not solely depend on agricultural activities. Other than privately-owned community land, the Preliminary LARAP survey also identified some of the proposed Project facilities footprint area located within forestry area (indicated protected forest based on the Letter of Head of BPKH Region IV dated 1 March 2018). However this needs to be confirmed with the regional forestry agency. Therefore coordination with the Task Force Unit for Forest Management of West Manggarai Regency is recommended to arrange for a joint site visit. For the road upgrading or widening on Trans Flores area, it is recommended to coordinate with the National Road Management Unit (Balai Pelaksanaan Jalan Nasional) in Kupang and/or Regional Planning Agency, while for road widening on sub-district road, direct consultation with land owners, coordinated with the local government agency e.g. Local Road Office Agency (Dinas Bina Marga), and the Sano Nggoang Sub-district Head is recommended. The land acquisition process will be undertaken by Regional Land Procurement Committee (or Land Acquisition Team/LAT) which includes BPN and relevant regional government offices, as according to Law Number 2 of 2012 and its implementing regulations. The process of land acquisition for development in the public interest is divided into stages: (1) planning; (2) preparation; (2) implementation; (3) submission of land acquisition completion report; and (5) monitoring and evaluation. On budget matters, SMI has allocated approximately USD 65,000 (approximately IDR 862 million) for Phase I slimhole drilling and USD 4,000 (approximately IDR 53 million) for Phase II standard drilling of the Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project. Some of these budgets will be used for acquiring the required land area. Information regarding land rental cost was not available, since land rental was not a common land transaction in the area, while estimated budget for land purchase is provided in the Section 7 of the document. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 9 Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Action Plan (LARAP) 1. Introduction 1.1. Background With the identified great potential for geothermal energy in Indonesia, the Government of Indonesia has set up a government-sponsored exploration-drilling program in partnership with the World Bank under the Geothermal Energy Upstream Development Project (GEUDP), to manage barriers of geothermal power development due to large risk and prohibitive costs associated with exploring the resource. Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) (“SMI”) will be one of the implementing agencies for the program based on the assignment from the Ministry of Finance of Indonesia. From a technical point of view, the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (MEMR) under the Directorate General of Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation (Ditjen EBTKE) and the Geological Unit (Badan Geologi – BG) will take part actively in the program. The program will be focused on green field areas in the eastern part of Indonesia. Based on a recommendation from the MEMR, SMI proposes the first geothermal exploration site at Wae Sano Village on West Manggarai Regency, Flores Island (hereafter referred as “the Project”). The Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project is one of several projects planned by the Government to facilitate the exploration phase and deliver data to the market on exploitable geothermal resources. The activities would be carried out to accelerate renewable energy development in Indonesia and to promote sustainable development in the energy sector. Following the Project plan to seek funding from the World Bank, AECOM is commissioned to develop a Preliminary (Abbreviated) Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) to meet the World Bank requirements for managing land acquisition and involuntary resettlement, as has been adopted by SMI in its GEUDP Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) for Geothermal Energy Upstream Development Project (see Section 3.3). Since the Project is currently still at the design stage, this document is developed as a preliminary document to the full LARAP which will be developed at a later stage of the Project once the requirements of land and location for each of the Project facility has been confirmed. 1.2. Objectives This Preliminary (Abbreviated) Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) is prepared as a significant part of the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) and Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMP) for the Project. Abbreviated LARAP is required to be developed when involuntary land acquisition for a sub-project affects less than 200 people, and less than 10% of households’ productive assets are affected and/or does not involve physical relocation. Following the GEUDP ESMF on resettlement policy, the objective of this Preliminary LARAP is to provide recommendations on the approaches of land acquisition implementation for the Project (see Section 4). Conclusions and recommendations will be made in terms of how land acquisition and resettlement will be 1 managed for the project, either through willing buyer/willing seller , or involuntary land acquisition and resettlement, or a combination of both, and how this should be implemented to adhere to Indonesian laws and World Bank Operational Policy 4.12 on Involuntary Resettlement. Of note, full LARAP could not be developed at the current stage of the Project, until confirmed location for the Project facilities have been finalised and direct interview with each of the affected people can be undertaken to obtain the socio-economic data of their households. This Preliminary LARAP will only provide general information on land status and land tenure system (see Section 5), and to seek several options for land acquisition scheme specific for the Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project, derived from the SMI GEUDP ESMF. Therefore, this document shall be updated after the Project established the Land Acquisition Team (LAT) to provide details of land that will be acquired for the Project, livelihood condition of PAPs which may confirming each of the household’s loss of productive assets, and breakdown budget for each land acquisition activities. Development of the full LARAP document itself will be led by the Site Management Team (SMT) / Safeguard Team, which would then need to be reviewed and approved by the PMU, MEMR and World Bank, when the physical works and land acquisition are to be commenced. 1 The process of buying and selling comprises bargaining and making a deal between buyer and seller and is conducted willingly, without any force. If the land is accounted as customary land (tanah ulayat), the process should involve Tu’a Golo, head of the village and boundary witness. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 10 Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Action Plan (LARAP) 1.3. Methodology and Approach The following approaches were undertaken to meet the objective of this Preliminary LARAP, to enable the team obtaining relevant information pertaining to land ownership status and condition of each of the proposed Project locations (details of the land requirements are provided in Section 2 of this document):  Interview with local and regional stakeholders, including Head of Sano Nggoang Sub-district, Head of Wae Sano Village, and customary leaders, were undertaken during the team site visit from 22 to 30 November 2017 to gather land tenure information specific to the proposed Project locations (e.g. well pads, laydown area, spoil disposal, and widening area of access road) – these include interviews with Wae Sano Village Head, Customary Leaders, and Sano Nggoang District Head;  Observation survey for most of the proposed Project facilities locations in accordance to the Project Description made available to AECOM prior to site visit;  GIS mapping to obtain information regarding land cover and land use for all locations, including the proposed alternative well pads locations and some of the road widening changes provided in 22 December 2017; and  Desktop review of available secondary data on forest status and regional spatial planning that were obtained during the ESIA (environmental and social impact assessment) study undertaken within the same timeline as this Preliminary LARAP. 1.4. Study Limitations The framework for development of this Preliminary (Abbreviated) LARAP referring to the GEUDP ESMF Appendix L, with some study limitations, as discussed and agreed with SMI and the World Bank in 13 October and 21 November 2017. These include the followings:  Census of all land owners and users (if any) could not be conducted, refer to the Term of Reference of the Request for Proposal dated 2 November 2017, Task 7 (point 7) which suggested that the report to be developed based on secondary data without any primary engagement from the local communities, except with Sano Nggoang Sub-district and Wae Sano Village Offices and/or observation (see Section 5);  As also specified in the same point, cost and budget estimation for land acquisition implementation should use standard of land NJOP and market price, while measurement of large land area should be done without direct measurement on the land itself (see Section 7);  During coordination meeting with SMI and the World Bank Team on 21 November 2017, as per SMI directions, information regarding the proposed Project locations and boundary to be kept confidential, and only limited information could be shared to stakeholders including to district and village head, to avoid potential land acquisition issue such as land speculator – therefore details land ownership number could not be obtained; and  Limited timeframe provided to develop the report and undertake the site visit within the first week after kick-off meeting, based on the Project design provided to AECOM in 27 October and 3 November 2018. Of note, some of the road widening locations were not confirmed prior to site visit, while the three (3) well pad alternatives of WS-B1, WS-B4, and WS-E (alternative) were only identified in 22 December 2017, due to the cultural sensitivity of the original locations that were just identified during the site visit. Since these new proposed areas were not surveyed during the site visit, information regarding the general on-site condition presented in this report are obtained from GIS-based mapping and secondary data. These study limitations are expected to be addressed in the full LARAP which will be developed at a later stage once the requirements of land and location for each of the Project facility has been confirmed. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 11 Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Action Plan (LARAP) 2. Project Description 2.1. Overview The Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project would be implemented to facilitate investments in geothermal energy and to provide technical assistance and capacity building in geothermal exploration. The focus of the Project will be on the geothermal power development market on Flores Island, where electrification rates are lowest, poverty rates are highest and electricity generation is heavily reliant on diesel. Investing in geothermal power is expected to have long-term benefits for Indonesia’s sustainable development, electricity generation diversification and energy security. To utilise geothermal energy, production wells are drilled down into the heated water contained within the Earth's crust - the geothermal reservoir. Once these geothermal reservoirs are tapped into, the heated water and steam rise to the surface where the steam is separated and used to power steam turbines, which then generate mechanical energy that can be harnessed as electricity. Brine and condensate are returned via reinjection wells back to the geothermal reservoir. 2 The Project’s name under some reports used as referenced as The Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project , meanwhile, the Sano Nggoang name is used in other documents such as the Spatial Planning policy of West 3 Manggarai Regency and also some segments of the Screening Report as well. The name of Wae Sano is referring to the name of the village where the project was first initiated, while Sano Nggoang is the name of the lake, which is also used as the name of the village and sub district. Although both name of “Wae Sano” and “Sano Nggoang” are used interchangeably in the references, this document would use Waesano as the name of the project. The Waesano Project will cover the exploration phase of geothermal development, including permitting and field survey, land acquisition, workforce recruitment, land clearing and preparation, equipment and material mobilization, access road improvement, infrastructure and well pad development, exploration drilling, well testing, site closure, and site restoration and revegetation. The Project is still in the planning phase and layouts and operations may change according to the ongoing evaluation. Currently, the exploration activities will be carried out in a maximum area of 1.5 ha for slimhole well pad and 2.5 ha for standard well pad with the depth of each well reaches 1,500 – 2,500 meters. The exploration activities will be divided into Phase 1 and Phase 2. Phase 1 will include three slimhole drillings selected at Well Pad A, B, or E. The scope of activities in Phase 2 will include one standard hole drilling at any selected well pad after Phase 1 is completed. Alternative locations for well pad are prepared to anticipate the Project change. The estimated total land requirement for project development is presented in the Section 2.3. It is understood that geothermal exploitation is a separate development phase that will not be part of the Waesano Geothermal Exploration project. The nature and scale of the exploitation phase will not be well understood at the time of the preparation of this LARAP. If the drilling concludes that the geothermal resource is sufficient for energy production, and there is sufficient demand for additional electricity generation on Flores, the resource could be developed. This development will occur beyond the life of the Waesano Geothermal Exploration project. Land acquisition is included as one of project activities for the exploitation phase. 2.2. Project Location The Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project is mainly located in the Wae Sano Village in Sano Nggoang Sub - District, West Manggarai Regency of East Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia. This includes the proposed 4 well pads areas of WS-A, B, D, and E, and 3 alternatives well of WS-B1, B4, and E (alternative). The total size of the 2 proposed geothermal exploration activity is approximately 10 km situated in the area surrounding Lake Sano Nggoang, a 2.5 km diameter sulfuric crater lake in the center of Mount Wae Sano, on the southwest corner of Flores Island. Although the location is only about 35 km east of Labuan Bajo, the capital of West Manggarai Regency, because of the poor road conditions within the last 23 km to the site, it takes around two to three hours to reach the 2 Terms of Reference for Wae Sano Project, RFP, 2016; GEUDP Social and Environmental Safeguards Screening of Potential Sites for Geothermal Development in Eastern Indonesia – Screening Report for Wae Sano, March 2016 3 According to Central Bureau of Statistics (Badan Pusat Statistik), the written form of the village name uses 2 words – “Wae Sano”. The name of the geothermal project will use “Waesano” as one word. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 12 Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Action Plan (LARAP) location. The asphalt road from Labuan Bajo to Wae Lolos, the entry point to Werang, which is the capital of Sano Nggoang Sub-District, is in good condition, though there are some potholes found on the road from Wae Lolos to Werang; while the road from Werang to the lake is in even less good condition. Wae Sano Village is connected by Trans Flores Road from Labuan Bajo Port to the main Sano Nggoang Sub- district Road, and local village access road. The main road is an asphalt road and that is 38 km and 5 m wide; the local access road is also an asphalt road at 23 km and 2 m wide. Some roads widening are also planned along these roads. 2.3. Land Requirements for Well Pad Development and Supporting Infrastructures The preliminary prospective footprints for the well pads for the Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project were planned to be in Nunang and Dasak Sub-villages of Wae Sano Village and Nggoang Sub -village of Sano Nggoang Village, however with the current changes in the Project Description, the Project footprint has been reduced as all the main proposed well pads are located only in Wae Sano Village. The suitability of the Project with the Regional Spatial Planning is based on the Law of West Manggarai Regency on Spatial Planning under Local Regulation of West Manggarai Number 9 of 2012 (see Section 2.4). In the previous Project Description received by AECOM in November 2016, the Project was planning for 6 well pads including Well pad 1, 2, 3, 3’, 4, and A’. AECOM has issued a Land Acquisition Conclusion and Recommendation Report on May 2017 to provide general guideline of land acquisition for these well pads locations, based on survey to the proposed well pad locations. However due to changes in the Project Description received in 27 October and 3 November 2017, and considering the GEUDP ESMF requirements for the development of Abbreviated LARAP for the Project, this Preliminary (Abbreviated) LARAP is developed focusing on the recent proposed design (which includes new locations of well pad A, B, D, and E) provided to AECOM prior to the additional field survey to the new proposed locations. In addition, as has been described earlier in Section 1.4, this report also included the 3 new alternative well pads (of WS-B1, WS-B-4, and WS-E (Alternative)) were planned in 22 December 2017. The development of the following Project exploration facilities require a number of land area to be acquired:  4 well pads areas (i.e. WS-A, WS-B, WS-D and WS-E) and the 3 alternatives (WS-B1, WS-B4, and WS- E (alternative));  Laydown area;  A small temporary workshop will be built at the site to provide routine for maintenance and minor repair of vehicles and machinery at the well pads;  Base camps for civil contractor and for drilling, includes logistics, maintenance and stores, mess, water and sanitation, power generator set, and fencing;  Cuttings storage area;  Explosives bunker;  Spoil disposal area;  Drilling water supply from the lake (including a, probably small, holding pond for treated water at the end of the pipeline to be run from the lake outline, and a working area for mixing and holding caustic soda in tanks); and  Road widening for access to the well pads. The location of these indicative Project facilities, also the proposed access road widening, can be seen in Figure 2-1. Meanwhile, details of large areas are presented in the table below. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 13 Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Action Plan (LARAP) Table 2-1 Land Requirement Land Acquisition Scheme for the Coordinate Location* Estimated Area Well Pad and Supporting Facilities Current Stage of (WGS 1984 Zone 51S) (Ha)** the Project Exploration Well Pad WS-A – Phase 1 (Slimhole) 169550 E . 9033989 S 0.57 Lease Well Pad WS-A – Phase 2 (Standard hole) 169412 E . 9033824 S 2.38 Lease Well Pad WS-B – Phase 1 (Slimhole) 170293 E . 9034651 S 0.68 Lease Well Pad WS-B – Phase 2 (Standard hole) 170455 E . 9034696 S 2.05 Lease Well Pad WS-B1 – Phase 2 (Standard hole) 170717 E . 9034766 S 0.64 Lease Well Pad WS-B4 – Phase 2 (Standard hole) 169965 E . 9034438 S 0.68 Lease Well Pad WS-D – Phase 1 (Slimhole) 170444 E . 9036415 S 1.03 Lease Well Pad WS-D – Phase 2 (Standard hole) 170504 E . 9036392 S 1.35 Lease Well Pad WS-E – Phase 1 (Slimhole) 169352 E . 9037351 S 0.79 Lease Well Pad WS-E – Phase 2 (Standard hole) 169289 E . 9037315 S 3.15 Lease Well Pad WS-E (Alternative) – Phase 1 169544 E . 9036810 S 0.55 Lease (Slimhole) Well Pad WS-E (Alternative) – Phase 2 169540 E . 9036875 S 1.37 Lease (Standard hole) Spoil Disposal 1 170631 E . 9036529 S 1.05 Lease Spoil Disposal 2 169642 E . 9036750 S 1.61 Lease Spoil Disposal 3 169627 E . 9034052 S 1.18 Lease Spoil Disposal 4 171196 E . 9046945 S 0.54 Lease Spoil Disposal 5 171605 E . 9044839 S 0.37 Lease Spoil Disposal 6 170587 E . 9039275 S 0.50 Lease Road Upgrade – Widening of sharp bends 170276 E . 9049070 S 0.04 Scheme will be (curves) at a few locations along the Trans selected after Flores National Road from Labuan Bajo to coordination around KM30 (junction to the existing local between access road government agency Road Upgrade – Widening of sharp bends From Intersection Trans 0.70 Purchase (curves) at some locations along the access Flores Road and Local Road road from the Trans Flores National Road to Project Location intersection to the Project area of interest Laydown Area 169496 E . 9033973 S 0.35 Lease Drilling Base Camp – Phase 1 169665 E . 9036107 S 0.53 Lease Drilling Base Camp – Phase 2 169665 E . 9036107 S 0.29 Lease Drilling Water Treatment Area 1 169381 E . 9034010 S 0.21 Lease Drilling Water Treatment Area 2 169548 E . 9036443 S 0.24 Lease TOTAL 22.86 Source: (Jacobs, December 2017) * : The coordinate is centroid of project footprint boundary ** : Area is estimated using ArcGIS software Information on land tenure/ownership of these required areas is described in Section 5, of this Preliminary LARAP. Further for the Project next stage of exploitation phase, the geothermal power plant operation will require land acquisition for the main facility including the power house, operation control room, cooling tower, steam pipelines, access road and supporting facilities including a switchyard, transmission line, etc. The power plant will require a Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 14 Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Action Plan (LARAP) maximum of 1 ha, irrespective of the generation technology selected (binary plant normally has a larger footprint than condensing steam plant, but either should fit within this 1 ha area). It is most likely that access will be by extension from an existing well pad and, given the rugged topography, this will require approximately 3 km of new road to be constructed. This, however, will be confirmed once the Project exploration phase is completed. 2.4. Suitability with the Regional Spatial Plan in East Nusa Tenggara Province The East Nusa Tenggara (NTT) Province’s regulation in spatial planning is under the NTT Regional Regulation (Perda) Number 1 of 2011, concerning the NTT Province Spatial Planning 2010 – 2030. One of the spatial planning strategies in the province is to intensify the quality and extent of infrastructure performance by expanding alternative and renewable energy, including geothermal energy. At regional level, the suitability of the Waesano project within the regional spatial planning in the area is reflected in West Manggarai Regency’s Spatial Planning Regulation Number 9 of 2012, regarding West Manggarai Regency’s Spatial Planning 2012 – 2032. In Article 13 (2e) of Energy Network System, the Sano Nggoang geothermal power plant is included as one of the energy sources to be developed in the regency. Although the regulation has mentioned the specific project in its spatial planning, it is yet to be reflected in the map; in the 2010 West Manggarai Spatial Planning Map, the Sano Nggoang Sub-district was only listed for tourism development plans and therefore needs to be updated. However, referring to the West Manggarai Regent Decree Number 170/KEP/HK/2016 dated on 8 August 2016, the regional government has committed to support the development of geothermal potency in Wae Sano for electricity energy source. The other consideration needed to be taken is forest status with the proposed location of the Project (see Figure 2-2). The Ministry of Environment and Forestry delegated BPKH (Forest Gazettement Agency) to prepare the map that demarcates forest and non-forest areas, which in turn becomes the basis of local government’s spatial plan. In theory, the delineation process should be carried out in close coordination with the district forestry agency (recently named Unit Pelaksana Tugas Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan or Task Force Unit for Forest Management) of West Manggarai Regency. However, BPKH may not carry out consultation with the regional forestry agency or the local government of West Manggarai Regency and may not consider the local government’s current spatial plan during forest map preparation. The letter of Head of BPKH Region IV dated 1 March 2018 advised that mapping analysis of the existing forest status map and area of forestry moratorium (known PIPPIB) indicated that most of the location of the Project’s well pads is located outside of forest area and area of forestry moratorium except for WS-B1 and WS-D that are indicatively located within the protected forest area. Furthermore, this letter also advised that the Project owner coordinate with the Task Force Unit for Forest Management of West Manggarai Regency for a joint site visit to confirm the boundary of the protected forest. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 15 Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Action Plan (LARAP) Figure 2-1 The Project Proposed Land Acquisition Area Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 16 Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Figure 2-2 Forest Status of the Project Proposed Land Acquisition area Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 17 Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) 3. Regulations and Policies for Land Acquisition This section provides regulatory framework applicable for the Project, mainly for the current phase of exploration. There are 3 main frameworks that will be used, as described in the following sub-sections:  Indonesia law and regulations;  The World Bank safeguard policy on land acquisition and involuntary resettlement (OP 4.12); and  SMI GEUDP ESMF on resettlement policy. 3.1. Law and Regulation for Land Acquisition in Indonesia Geothermal exploration is important for energy infrastructure development, and under the country system it is categorized as a public interest development. Land acquisition for development of public interest in Indonesia is regulated under a number of law and regulation. The following are applicable for the Project, as follow: 1. Law number 2 of 2012 on Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest (Land Acquisition Law) for acquiring land for public use activities, with the implementing regulations, including (a) Presidential Regulation (PR) number 71 of 2012, which has been amended by PR number 40 of 2014, PR number 99 of 2014, PR number 30 of 2015 and the most updated one, PR number 148 of 2015; and (b) Head of Land Agency Regulation 5 of 2012 and its amendment number 6 of 2015. The Law 2 of 2012 Article 10 (e) clearly states that geothermal energy infrastructure is included as activities for public interest. Meanwhile the Article 7 (2) states: “Where Acquisition of Land is made for geothermal energy infrastructure, the acquisition shall be performed with reference to the Strategic Plan and the Working Plan of the Agencies needing land as intended by section (1) point (c) – the Strategic Plan and point (d) – the Working Plan of each agency needing land. The Presidential Regulation number 71 of 2012 has been amended four times. The key changes are:  40 of 2014 (...Land acquisition up to 5 hectare can be directly conducted by the agency needing land with holders of land right through a business transaction or other way agreed by both parties...), it has changed the threshold of small-scale land acquisition from 1 to 5 hectares, the small-scale land acquisition can be done directly by the institution requiring land through normal land purchase, land exchange or other scheme agreed by both parties (article 121);  PR number 99 of 2014 (...Head of Land Acquisition Implementation issues compensation value resulted from appraiser or public appraiser);  PR number 30 of 2015 (...Finance for land acquisition can be sourced from a company (Badan Usaha) as Agency acquiring the land has been given the right to act on behalf of the state, ministerial, non-ministerial government agency, or provincial or district government), it allows private company assigned by the government to develop public infrastructures to use the Law; and  PR number 148 of 2015 (...Land acquisition for public interest development purpose up to 5 hectares does not need location determination letter. to the agency that requires land must use an appraiser for land valuation...).  Meanwhile, the latest Regulation 6 of 2015 for the Amendment Regulation of the BPN 5 of 2012 on Technical Guidelines for the Implementation of Land Acquisition opens up the opportunity for private entrepreneurs to bailout land acquisition fund for public -interest infrastructure projects. The bailout would then be replaced using state budget funds through the relevant ministries or agencies. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) 2. Law Number 5 of 1960 regarding Standard Agrarian Law and Regulations can be referred for land lease and rentals. The land lease agreements must comply with the standard legal drafting according to the terms and conditions which each party has agreed upon. 3. The Presidential Regulation Number 56 of 2017 concerning the Management of Social Impact in the Procurement of Land for National Strategic Project. The regulation observes the need for provision of additional allowance/supports as part of management of social impacts from land acquisition to consider cost of mobilisation, cost for moving, house rent during transition, and loss of income. These should be incorporated into a document of social impact management plan. It also regulates the use of lands by squatters and illegal tenants. This regulation defines those who have no land rights, its criteria, how to identify it, the procedures to deal with it and who is responsible. 4. The Minister for Agrarian and the Head of the National Land Agency Regulation 3 of 1997 specifies the implementation procedures for Government Regulation number 24 of 1997 on the Registration of Land. It specifies all the procedures and requirements for the land registration and acquisition process. The initial part/step(s) of the process includes scaling and other requirements for maps, plotting coordinate projections; regulations pertaining to boundary markets; legitimate survey procedures; prescriptions for necessary documentation; official publication of claim and title processes; objection processes; land title verification and administrative procedures; and the issuance of land certificates. 5. The transfer of land title is also specified in the Degree of the Minister for Agrarian and the Head of the National Land Agency Number 21 of 1999 regarding procedure for obtaining land by capital investment companies, which include:  The agreement for sale and transfer of control over land;  Applications for change of land status or right over land;  Application forms for particular land use permits; and  The appropriate forms registering transfer of right over land. 6. The Presidential Regulation (PR) number 24 of 2010 on Forest Area (Kawasan Hutan) regulates the permit (Ijin Pinjam Pakai Kawasan Hutan/IPPKH) required for any activities in the forest area. Geothermal activities in the forest area will need to obtain the permit before the geothermal license is granted. 7. Law No. 40 Year 2007 Concerning Limited Company Article 74 (1) observed all companies having its business activities in the field of and/or related to natural resources, shall be obliged to perform its Social and Environmental Responsibility. Implementing regulation for the implementation is provided in the PR Number 47 of 2012. 3.2. The World Bank Safeguards Policy on Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement The World Bank's safeguard policies and procedures that are triggered for the proposed Waesano Project with respect to land acquisition is OP/BP 4.12 on Involuntary Resettlement. This is because, even though the land acquisition prioritizes and prefers a willing buyer – willing seller basis, there may be some involuntary land purchases for road alignments, or future restrictions on access to forest resources, in the exploitation phase. The “involuntary resettlement” refers both to physical displacement (relocation or loss of shelter) and economic displacement (loss of assets or access to assets that leads to loss of income sources or other means of livelihood) as a result of the project activities. Resettlement is considered involuntary when affected persons or communities do not have the right to refuse land acquisition or restrictions on land use that result in physical or economic displacement. This occurs in cases of: (i) lawful expropriation, or temporary or permanent restrictions on land use, and (ii) negotiated settlements in which the buyer can resort to expropriation or impose legal restrictions on land use if negotiations with the seller failed. The World Bank's policies on involuntary resettlement are: 1. Involuntary resettlement should be avoided where feasible, or minimized, exploring all viable alternative project designs; Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) 2. Where it is not feasible to avoid resettlement, resettlement activities should be designed and executed as part of a sustainable development program, e.g., providing sufficient resources to enable the persons displaced by the project to share in project benefits. Persons displaced by the project should be meaningfully consulted and be given the opportunity to participate in the planning and implementation of resettlement programs; and 3. Displaced persons should receive assistance in their efforts to improve their livelihoods and living standards, or at least to restore them, in real terms, to pre-displacement levels or to levels prevailing prior to the project commencement, whichever is higher. The policy aims to avoid involuntary resettlement if possible, as well as the requirements for participation in resettlement planning, compensation provision that improves, or at least restores, incomes and living standards if an involuntary resettlement could not be avoided. The Bank's experience with geothermal projects in Indonesia with regard to involuntary resettlement indicates that land is acquired through commercial transactions rather than expropriation, and involuntary resettlement does not occur. The World Bank OP 4.12 does not apply to resettlement resulting from voluntary land transactions (i.e., market transactions in which the seller is not obliged to sell and the buyer cannot resort to expropriation or other compulsory procedures sanctioned by the legal system of the host country if negotiations fail). It also does not apply to impacts on livelihoods where the project is not changing the land use of the affected groups or communities. Land acquisition of the land for the Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project’s drilling activities will be conducted through voluntary land transaction mechanisms of land lease or willing seller-willing buyer4. In cases of any adverse economic, social, or environmental impacts from the project activities (exploration drilling) other than land acquisition (e.g., loss of access to assets or resources or restrictions on land use), the Project aims to avoid, minimize, mitigate or compensate. However, if significant impacts from voluntary land acquisition are occurred, the project will apply the requirements of the World Bank OP 4.12 on Involuntary Resettlement to avoid, remedy or mitigate the impacts. Prior to implementation of land acquisition and resettlement activities of the Project, the following processes are required by World Bank OP 4.12 requirements (details applicability for the Project are discussed in Section 4):  Avoid involuntary resettlement and, if unavoidable, minimize its potential impacts;  Assess the potential economic and social impacts of involuntary land acquisition and resettlement on the project affected people (PAP) and their livelihoods;  Identify categories of affected persons and their respective entitlements;  Set out clear process of consultation with and participation of PAPs in the preparation and planning of involuntary land acquisition and resettlement, if any, as well as information dissemination to the PAPs;  Compensate for lost assets at full replacement cost;  Compensate informal/illegal land users for lost assets and provide assistance in relocating, if needed;  Compensate and obtain legal access to expropriated land before starting construction;  Provide information and prepare special assistance programs for vulnerable groups including the persons without any immovable property; and  Provide and prepare plans for grievance redress and monitoring. 3.3. SMI GEUDP ESMF on Resettlement Policy SMI has developed a high-level Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) which provide guidance and principles to avoid, minimize, and mitigate any adverse environmental or social impacts of all of its geothermal energy upstream development projects, including resettlement process for the Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project. SMI policy framework for resettlement observes the following process, applicable for the Project: 4 This means market transactions in which the seller is not obliged to sell and the buyer cannot resort to expropriation or other compulsory procedures if negotiations fail Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP)  Preparation and approval of Abbreviated LARAP, which include: - Provision of documentation regarding land acquisition needs (including the lands that will be needed for the project in future, where, and what the existing land ownership and land uses); - Determine cut-off date and eligibility criteria for all affected persons; - Collection of evidences as proof of eligibility; and - Development of entitlement matrix to ensure that compensation will be paid at replacement value in addition to transitional assistance, land is replaced with that of equal value and amenities, livelihood assets are replaced with those of equal value, and benefit sharing is assured through additional support mechanisms where possible.  Application of negotiated land compensation which include meaningful consultations, offer of fair price, and transparency in negotiation. Specifically for the Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project, land acquisition process will be conducted to comply with Indonesia law and regulation, as well as the SMI GEUDP ESMF on Resettlement Policy. The processes are detailed in the following Section 4 of this document. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) 4. Project Land Acquisition Process 4.1. The Project Potential Schemes of Land Acquisition The Project will acquire the proposed land areas through two (2) potential schemes of (i) land lease; and (ii) willing buyer – willing seller scheme. GEUDP ESMF has provided guidance for each of the scheme, as discussed in the following sections. 4.1.1. Land Lease At the current phase of exploration, the Project will use land lease scheme to acquire most of the proposed land. The agreement will pay attention to the local customs for leasing land. The Land Lease Agreement must also comply with the terms and conditions that each party has agreed on and have it in writing; this shall also be approved by the customary leaders. Land lease scheme is regulated in the Basic Agrarian Law Number 5 of 1960, Government Regulation Number 40 of 1996 on Land Use Rights and Law Number 2 of 2012 regarding Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest. 4.1.2. Willing Buyer – Willing Seller Scheme Willing buyer – willing seller scheme will be applied mainly for the road widening, as would be permanent changes regardless the Project phase. Referring to the land requirements for the Project, land required for each of the Project facilities are less than 5 ha. As per the provision under the Presidential Regulation Number 40/2014, acquisition of land less than 5 ha will be undertaken through transaction, exchange, or other means acceptable by landowners and parties that need the land. The following principles will be applied in undertaking land acquisition through willing buyer – willing seller scheme:  Compensation is paid at replacement value, which takes into account the prevalent market prices as determined by a Licenced Independent Appraiser(s). No administrative cost will be deducted and tax obligations will be covered by the negotiated transaction;  All negotiations with the landowners and users, if any, will be carried out in an accessible location, in an open and consultative manner without any coercion and with sufficient time for consideration of offers;  The documents pertaining to the land acquisition such as map, land registries, sales written records, consultation records, decision records, law and policies for the negotiations and development plans are to be disclosed to the entitled parties involved in the negotiated land acquisition or settlement;  Adequate and fair price for land and/or other assets will be offered. If negotiations fail, an alternative way will be sought and the process begins again, which will follow the Law 2/2012 requirements;  The negotiated amount will be paid immediately to landowners after all necessary documents required for the land acquisition processes have been completed by land owners;  Negotiation and other consultation proceedings will be documented and the land sale and purchase agreement will be signed by the negotiating parties in the presence of a land deed official (notary);  Grievance mechanism will be used to receive and facilitate resolution of the entitled parties concerns (see 4.8); and  Proper documentation of the whole process, including grievance received and resolutions. The project will not start a civil works contract until (a) payment has been fully provided to the entitled parties and rehabilitation measures are implemented if any; (b) already-compensated entitled parties have cleared the area in a timely manner; and (c) the area is free from any encumbrances. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) 4.2. Key Principles for Government Acquisition Process of Land for Public Interests As in accordance with Indonesia law and regulations, land acquisition for public interest to be proposed by the Government agency who requires the land (in the case of this Project, this will be proposed by the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resource / MEMR). Land acquisition for the Project will be undertaken in three stages which includes:  Preparation Stage;  Implementing Stage; and  Submission stage. Requirements of the World Bank for resettlement which has been adopted in GEUDP ESMF will be implemented in parallel along with the implementation of these 3 stages of government process. The land acquisition process will commence after the Land Acquisition Plan document (prepared in the planning stage) is handed over to the Regent. The land acquisition process is presented in Figure 4-1. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Figure 4-1 Land Acquisition and Resettlement Process (Based on Law Number 2/2012 and PR Number 71/2012) Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 24 Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) 4.3. Planning and Preparation Stage The most significant part of the land acquisition process in the preparation stage is the exchange of information to the PAPs and the local community. They must be provided with information regarding the land acquisition and must be aware of the implementation plan. Moreover, community should be involved, provide writing or verbally feedback on the land acquisition activities, and provide support in the implementation of the land acquisition. Land acquisition activities for the Waesano Geothermal Exploration project preparation stage will include (as discussed in the following sub-sections):  Conducting public notification;  Undertake initial inventory; and  Public consultation. Part of this stage is the establishment and announcement of notice of project location determination. This is aligned with the World Bank safeguard and GEUDP ESMF policy on resettlement which emphasize the importance of public consultation and stakeholder engagement to allow community feedback toward the process and input into the Project decision making which may affect to their life. 4.3.1. Public Notification Public notification aims to provide clear information about the activities of land acquisition to the public. It will be conducted directly through: (a) socialisation, (b) face to face meetings, (c) a letter of notification, or (d) notification indirectly through print and electronic media. Notification of the development plan, signed by the Chairman of the Preparation Team, shall be shared with the public a maximum of 20 working days after the Land Acquisition Planning Document is officially accepted by the Regent. The information will be presented in a public notification which includes: purpose and objectives the development plan; lay of the land and the area of land required; stages of the land acquisition plan; the estimated period of implementation of land acquisition; and other information that is considered necessary. One important consideration is preparing public notification documentation of activities as part of the process of land acquisition. The results of notifications conducted directly through socialization or face to face meetings shall be documented in meeting minutes which are signed by the Leader of the Preparation Team or appointed official. If notifications are sent directly by providing a letter to the community, then the evidence of delivery of the notice shall be made in the form of a receipt from the village head. If the notice is issued directly through print and electronic media documentation of the document shall be saved. 4.3.2. Initial Inventory The initial data collection will include an inventory of the activities of the PAPs and the Objects of Land Acquisition. The activity is conducted through working together with village officials no more than 30 working days after the notification of the development plan. The whole process must be completed within 30 working days, after which time there is an initial inventory of PAPs and Objects of Land Acquisition. The survey results are signed by the Chairman of the Preparation Team, as a material for the implementation of Public Consultation. For PAP criteria for inclusion in the initial inventory, refer to the Section 4.8 Entitlement Framework, of this document. 4.3.3. Public Consultation Public Consultation on the development plan will provide more information on the location of the development plan area to the PAPs and affected communities. The goal of the public consultation is to gain agreement on the development plan area from the community. The agreement on the location of the development plan will be outlined in an agreement report. Public consultation will be conducted with an oral presentation and participation of the PAPs and communities. PAPs and the community will be given an opportunity to express their views and responses to the location of the project development plan of the Waesano Geothermal Exploration project. The role and the presence of PAPs shall be demonstrated in the form of an attendance list. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) Implementation of the public consultation shall be carried out within 60 working days from the date of signing of the initial inventory. The public consultation can be conducted several times. The location of public consultation can be settled based upon an agreement by the Preparation Team. The public consultation invitation can be addressed directly to the PAPs or to the village government officials no later than three (3) working days prior to the public consultation activities. The Preparation Team shall preserve a receipt/record of the invitation. In the public consultation, the following activities will be described: purpose and objectives the project development plan for the Waesano Geothermal Exploration project; stages and the timing of the land acquisition; Assessment Team’s role in determining the value of compensation; description of the object to be assessed for compensation; forms of compensation; rights and PAPs obligations. If in the Public Consultation, the PAPs or their proxies do not agree or have objections, then a repeat public consultation shall be carried out within 30 working days from the date of the agreement report. If in the next Public Consultation there are still parties that object to the location of the development plan, then the agency requiring the land should report the objections to the Regent through the Preparation Team. The Objection Assessment Team will identify the cause of the objection and will do the following: prepare an inventory of the problem which is the reason for the objection; hold meetings or clarification with the parties who submit the objections; make recommendations on acceptance or rejection of objections signed by the Chairman of the Objection Assessment Team and sent to the Regent. Based on the recommendations of the Assessment Team, the Regent will issue a letter of acceptance or rejection of the objection. Handling of objections by the Regent shall not exceed 14 working days from receipt of the objections. If the Regent decides to accept one’s objections, agencies requiring land should cancel the development plan or relocate development plan elsewhere. 4.3.4. Establishment of Location The Development Location Determination is made based on an agreement between the Preparation Team and the PAPs or based on the rejected objections from Parties who submit the objection. The Development Location Determination is also attached as a map and prepared by the agency requiring the land. The Development Location Determination is valid for a period of 2 years and can be carried for an extension period of 1 time for a maximum of 1 year by the Regent who submitted. The extension must be initiated no later than 2 months before the expiration of the Development Location Determination. The Announcement of Development Location Determination for projects in the public interest no later than 3 days from the date the Development Location Determination is issued and implemented for at least 14 working days, by means of: affixed in District/Village office, and/or the Regency/City office; at the construction site; and announced through print and/or electronic media. Announcement of the establishment of the construction site will include: number and date of decision of the location establishment; mapped location of development; purpose and objectives the construction and location of area of land required; approximate period of implementation of land acquisition; and the estimated period of construction. 4.4. Implementation Stage Based on the Location Development Determination, the agency requiring the land proposes the implementation of Land Acquisition to the National Land Agency (Badan Pertanahan Negara – BPN) with the completed Land Acquisition Planning Document and Development Location Determination enclosed. Provisions concerning the implementation of land acquisition are submitted to BPN, and the implementation is carried out by the Head Office of BPN as the Chief Executive of the Land Acquisition, who may be assisted by local regency BPN offices, as well as the local government leaders (e.g. Camat and village leaders). BPN, as the land acquisition Implementer, subsequently will prepare a detailed plan for implementation of the Land Acquisition as outlined in a work plan that includes at least:  Plan for funding of the implementation;  Plan for time and implementation scheduling;  Plan for procurement requirements of implementation;  Plan for materials and equipment needs; Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP)  Inventory and alternative solutions for inhibiting factors in the implementation; and  System monitoring for implementation. The Chief Executive of the Land Acquisition will establish the Land Acquisition Executive Task Force. The Task Force is in charge of the inventory and identification activities which are set up into two teams (task forces): Team A in charge of identifying the physical data, assets, land ownership details (including boundaries), use and land utilization; and Team B is in charge of identifying PAPs and information on the PAPs. Implementation of the Land Acquisition includes the following four steps: 1. Asset Inventory This activity performed within a maximum period of 30working days from the establishment of the implementation team. The activities include: a. Measurement and mapping of areas per plot of land; and b. Data collection of the PAPs and the Objects of Land Acquisition. The results of the inventory and identification of control, ownership, use, and utilization of the land shall be announced at the village office, sub-district office and at the location of Land Acquisition within a period of 14 working days from the inventory date. In the event that a PAP does not accept the results of the inventory, the PAPs may submit an objection to the Chief Executive of Land Acquisition within a period of 14 working days after the announced results of the inventory. The objection must be verified and addressed within a period of 14 working days after the submission of objections. In addition to the government requirements for the inventory of the affected assets, the World Bank policy observed a full socio-economic data of each of the affected people and households are gathered. 2. Appraisal of Compensation The announcement of results and/or verification after an objection of the inventory and identification of control, ownership, use, and utilization of land are set by the Chief Executive of Land Acquisition and subsequently become the basis for determining PAPs in granting the compensation. The determination of the value of the compensation is based on the appraisal report from an external Appraisal Service, or public appraisers appointed and determined by the Chief Executive of Land Acquisition. The duration of the valuation assessment shall be carried with 30 working days after establishment of the valuation team. The Asset Valuation is described in Section 4.5. 3. Negotiation and Deliberation on Compensation Determination The implementer of Land Acquisition shall conduct deliberations with the PAPs within a period of 30 working days after the appraisal results from the Appraiser are submitted to the Chief Executive of Land Acquisition to define the forms and/or amount of compensation. Compensation is based on the appraisal results. The agreed results of these deliberations provide the basis of compensation to PAPs/their proxy and shall be stated in the minutes (Official Report) of the final deal. In the case that there is no agreement regarding the form and/or amount of compensation, the PAPs may submit their objection to the local District Court within a period of 14 working days after deliberation on the compensation determination. A court will decide the forms and/or the amount of compensation within a period of 30 working days after the submission of the objection. Parties who objected to the District Court decision may submit a cassation to the Supreme Court within a period of 14 working days. The Supreme Court must make a decision within a period of 30 working days after the request for cassation is received. District Court/Supreme Court which has permanent legal force shall become the basis for payment of compensation to the party who submitted the objection. 4. Compensation Provision Compensation payment may take the form of: Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) a. Cash; b. Land replacement; c. Resettlement; d. Shareholding; and/or e. Other forms as approved by both parties. The Land Acquisition Implementer makes a determination regarding the form of compensation based on the minutes (official report) of the agreement and/or the District Court/Supreme Court decision. The provision is made in the minutes (official report) of compensation provision, which includes: a. List of PAPs as the recipient of compensation; b. Forms and amount of compensation that has been given; c. List and proof of payment/receipt; and d. The minutes (official report) for land rights release and the delivery of evidence of occupancy or ownership of the Object of Land Acquisition to the agency requiring the land through the Land Acquisition Implementer. In terms of the PAPs who reject the form and/or amount of compensation based on the results of deliberation or the District Court/Supreme Court decision, the compensation is deposited in the local District Court. Compensation may be deposited in the local district court in cases where: a. The whereabouts of the PAPs are unknown; b. The Objects of Land Acquisition to be provided for the compensation, include:  Objects that are the subject of a case in court;  Objects that whose ownership is disputed;  Objects that have been seized by the authorities; or  Objects subject to a guarantee from the bank. At the time of provision of compensation and relinquishment of rights has been executed or the provision of compensation has been deposited in the District Court, the ownership or Land Rights of PAPs is to be removed, the right to objection is revoked and the land is controlled directly by the state. 4.5. Completion Report Submission Stage The Chief Executive of Land Acquisition shall submit the results of the land acquisition to the agency requiring the land along with all land acquisition data no later than 7 working days after the release of compensation, with the record of minutes (official report). After the submission process, within a period of 30 working days, the agency requiring the land shall undertake land registration/certification in order to start the development process. Financing the land acquisition for development of projects in the public interest is the responsibility of the agencies that require land. For efficiency and effectiveness, land acquisition for public interest that requires less than 5 hectares of land can be carried out directly by the agency requiring the land with the holders of land rights in a way that is agreeable by both parties. 4.6. Compensation Appraisal 4.6.1. Government Valuation for Compensation In accordance with Law 2 of 2012 on Land Acquisition for Public Interest, the land compensation process will be conducted by a Regional Land Procurement Committee (or Land Acquisition Team/LAT), established by the Regent. The LAT will be consisted of relevant regional government agency and the land national agency (BPN). Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) The land valuation/appraisal will then to be conducted by licensed appraisers, which is assigned by BPN in 5 accordance with the national procurement regulations. The valuation will be carried out based on the MAPPI Standards as specified in the MAPPI Guidelines. The Standard follows the same principles as the Law, in term that the determination of the compensation amount is based on the “principles of humanity, fairness, usefulness, certainty, transparency, agreement, participation, welfare, harmony and sustainability”. The Fair Replacement Value is based on the market value of the property, with attention to non -physical elements associated with loss of property ownership, caused by the land acquisition. The result of the appraisal 6 would be used by the Land Office as the base of the BPN to negotiating the form of the compensation. The 7 detail objects of valuation are as follow : 1. Physical values, includes: land; space above ground and underground; building; plants and crops; objects related to the land, such as utilities and facilities support building, with the following provisions – evaluation to be conducted by land price appraisal team or institution appointed by the Regent:  Compensation for loss land to consider the based tax object sale value (NJOP) evaluated by the appointed land price appraisal team or institution;  Compensation for loss of structure to be evaluated by relevant regional agency (i.e. public works office); and  Compensation for loss of plants to be evaluated by relevant regional agency (i.e. agricultural agency) 2. Non-physical values, include:  Compensation on disposal rights of landowners, which will be given a premium, and is measured in terms of money under the provisions of the legislation in force. These substitutions may include matters relating to: a) loss of a job or the loss of business, including change of the profession; b) emotional loss (solatium), intangible losses associated with the acquisition of land use as the residence of the owner;  Transitional cost may include moving expenses and corresponding taxes;  Compensation of waiting period, the number of funds that considered as a substitute for the time difference between the valuation date by the estimated payment date;  Loss of remaining land accounts for the decline in the value of land as a result of partial plot land acquisition. This means that after acquisition the value of the remaining land is reduced; therefore the project should purchase the entire land area; and  Physical damage, such parts of a building are cut off as a result of land acquisition and therefore should be included in the compensation value. 3. In addition, the most updated PR Number 56/2017 indicates the need for provision of additional allowance/supports as part of management of social impacts from land acquisition to consider cost of mobilisation, cost for moving, house rent during transition, and loss of income. 4.6.2. Full Replacement Cost and Livelihood Restoration In addition to government requirements, GEUDP ESMP requires full compensation to be paid at replacement value in addition to transitional assistance; replacement land of equal value and amenities. Livelihood assets are replaced with those of equal value. Benefit sharing is assured through additional support mechanisms where possible. Provision of compensation for, both, government valuation and loss of livelihood for each affected people category will be specified in an entitlements matrix that includes the range of measures for compensation that includes cash or kind compensation, relocation cost, income rehabilitation assistance, transfer assistance, 5 Indonesian Society of Appraisers or ISA 6 According to Law 2 of 2012, the function of the appraisal is for negotiating form and amount of compensation; meanwhile the derivative regulations of the law, i.e. Presidential Regulation Number71/2012 and Head of BPN Regulation Number5/2012 rule that the function of the appraisal is for negotiating form of compensation 7 Indonesia Valuation Standards 306 (SPI 306), Land Acquisition Assessment For Development for the Public Interest, Code of Ethics Indonesia Appraisers and Indonesia Standard 2013, Jakarta, Gelora Karya Bharata, 2013. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) income substitution/business restoration, which are due to affected peoples, depending on the type, extent and nature of their losses, and which suffice to restore their social and economic base (see Section 4.7). Detailed calculation of compensation such as replacement cost, independent appraisal, etc. will be provided by the appointed certified Public Appraisal Office (KJPP). 4.7. Eligibility for Land Compensation 4.7.1. Eligibility Criteria of the Project Affected People (PAP) The PAPs in the project area would consist of three types: (i) persons with formal legal rights to land lost in its entirety or in part; (ii) persons who lost the land they occupy in its entirety or in part who have no formal legal rights to such land, but who have claims to such lands that are recognized or recognizable under national laws; and (iii) persons who lost the land they occupy in its entirety or in part who have neither formal legal rights nor recognized or recognizable claims to such land. The involuntary resettlement requirements apply to all three types of displaced persons; however, compensation varies according to the condition of displaced persons. According to Law 2 of 2012 following Presidential Decree 71 of 2012, there are different types of persons or entities eligible for compensation:  Land owner, who has full ownership rights over land;  Right to build title (hak pengelolaan, pihak yang menguasai tanah negara dengan itikad baik, pemegang dasar penguasaan atas tanah), which includes the right to construct and own buildings on state-owned land;  Recipient (nadzir) for donated wakaf land;  Right to cultivate title (bekas milik adat) which includes the right to use state-owned land for agricultural purposes;  Community with traditional land rights (hak ulayat) and individuals with traditional rights (hak adat); and  Owners of buildings, crops and plants and other affected non -land assets. Law No 2 of 2012 requires that all holders of land rights affected by the Project are entitled to compensation for loss of land and other assets on the land. In the proposed project, holders of land rights are also entitled to relocation assistance (if they must relocate as a result of land acquisition for the project) and rehabilitation support (if they suffer losses of income and/or livelihoods). 4.7.2. Vulnerable People and Gender Considerations In addition the above, as in accordance to the World Bank Safeguard Policy adopted in the GEUDP ESMF, the project will be required to pay particular attention to ensure that vulnerable parties and women are the recipients of compensation pertaining to and reflecting their full activities. The project will ensure that women who are de - facto household heads are clearly listed as beneficiaries of compensation and rehabilitation proceedings. In order to ensure that vulnerable parties are fully compensated, the following actions will be considered:  Impact assessment will disaggregate the PAP’s gender (or by vulnerable people if appropriate) and will clearly indicate the number of affected woman-headed households (or vulnerable people) and their pre- project socioeconomic status;  Women and vulnerable people will be encouraged to actively participate in all land acquisition resettlement-related consultations and negotiations, to be facilitated by women’s’ groups;  When required, special mitigation actions/measures for vulnerable people/women will be prepared and included in the resettlement plan;  All compensation given to woman-headed families will be given to only the woman family head, and;  Resettlement plan monitoring and evaluation will pay special attention on the impact of resettlement on women and other vulnerable people. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) Eligibility of land compensation premise for Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project is presented in an Entitlements Matrix to define fair compensation for losses associated with the Project. It include compensation of lost assets based on the principle of replacement cost (not value at purchase), which is also consistent with current government regulations. 4.8. Entitlement Framework 8 Entitlements matrix (Table 4-1) has been prepared to define the Project strategy to ensure adequate compensation for all affected people. This Entitlements Matrix is developed based on the types of loss that a PAP may suffer from, the criteria for eligibility (who will be entitled to value compensation, rehabilitation, and resettlement support), and a range of entitlements (forms of compensation for each different impacts which are not always financial). The entitlement variables are based upon National Regulations Regulation defined by Law Number 2 of 2012 and Presidential Regulation (PR) Number 71 of 2012. The matrix also provides additional consideration based upon international standards as defined by the World Bank Safeguard and GEUDP ESMF on Resettlement. Each entitlement that has been developed notes which regulatory framework it addresses. Essentially, adherence to World Bank Safeguard and GEUDP ESMF require the inclusion of more informal owners in the corridor in some form of compensation or resettlement plan. It requires that the project can clearly demonstrate that the lifestyles and livelihoods of all affected parties are maintained or enhanced. Adoption of the World Bank and GEUDP ESMF process are expected to reduce or mitigate the social impacts of the project and are likely to derive tangible longer term benefits in community acceptance of the project. 8 This entitlements matrix is based on the current understanding of the project, it will be updated with more specific information as more research is undertaken on the specific land affected by the project, and the parties affected by its change of use. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) Table 4-1 Entitlements Matrix for Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project (Based on GEUDP ESMF) Type of Loss Category of Project Affected Person Compensation Entitlements Regulatory Reference Permanent land loss (for Owner: person/group with legal title/registration Full replacement cost for land purchase (see Section 4.5). Eligibility criteria will follow the Presidential Regulation all type of land) of land ownership (including customary and Number 71/2012, article 17-26. traditional rights under Indonesian law) Land replacement based on Law Number 2/2012 article 36 and Presidential Regulation Number 71/2012 article 74. Law Number 2/2012 article 35 regulating non-viable land. GEUDP ESMF on Resettlement Policy Temporary land loss Owner: person / group with legal Land lease in the form of cash compensation for rent, and plot Law Number 2/2012 article 33 and PR Number 71/2012 title/registration of land ownership (including rehabilitation to 1/10th of market land value. article 65. customary and traditional rights under GEUDP ESMF on Resettlement Policy Indonesian law) Crop losses Owner of crops and trees (e.g. sharecroppers) Advance notice to harvest last crop and tree products is required. Law Number 2/2012 article 33 and PR Number 71/2012 article 65. Cash compensation to equal amount of market value of crop and tree lost plus cost of replacement of seed based on Agriculture GEUDP ESMF on Resettlement Policy Department estimate (for loss of tree, taking into account type, age and productive value). Income losses All PAP For a permanent impact, cash compensation of one year net Law Number 2/2012 article 33 and PR Number 71/2012 business income or salary. article 65 For a temporary impact, land lease compensation of net income PR Number 56/2017 or salary for the number of months of business or employment GEUDP ESMF on Resettlement Policy stoppage for a period of up to 1 year. Assessment to be based on paper evidence or oral testimony and Village Head confirmation. At least government decreed minimum salary will be provided. Commercial and non- Owner of commercial or non-residential Cash compensation for non-residential building and other fixed Law Number 2/2012 article 33 and PR Number 71/2012 buildings/assets with residential buildings/ registration assets at replacement value based on market price free of article 65 asset loss (e.g. plantation depreciation/transaction costs and salvaged materials plus Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) Type of Loss Category of Project Affected Person Compensation Entitlements Regulatory Reference huts) relocation allowance. GEUDP ESMF on Resettlement Policy Partial impacts will entail the compensation of the affected portion of the building plus repairs. Value of compensation of loss of structure for houses and huts referring to the regional government regulation on the value of structure. Community public Associated authority (owners of facilities) and For public facilities and infrastructure, in additional to provision of GEUDP ESMF on Resettlement Policy Infrastructure losses public as users of the facilities compensation agreed with associated local government agencies, (including religious and the process need to be consulted with community. public service structures) Or else, they will be fully replaced or rehabilitated so as to satisfy their pre-project functions. Reconstruction of lost structure in consultation with community. Allowance for severe All severely/significantly affected PAPs including For severe land impacts, an additional allowance equal to the GEUDP ESMF on Resettlement Policy impacts informal settlers and relocated tenants market value of the land for one year. Rehabilitation assistance For those being relocated, a rehabilitation allowance of equal to for PAPs with more than six months of average annual salary. 10 percent of income losses from the loss of land affected or to be relocated Allowance for vulnerable Especially vulnerable’ include households Allowance equivalent to 6 months of average annual salary and GEUDP ESMF on Resettlement Policy people headed by a single parent, woman or widow; employment priority for a household family member in project- include a pregnant woman or woman with a related jobs. newly born child; have more than six dependent children; and have a family member who has a disability, long term illness (including mental illness), or who has mobility challenges Forestry land Government (Forestry Agency) The compensation will be guided under the Ministry of Forestry; Object of land acquisition for public purposes that belongs to land use permit issued for the project government regulated according to the PR Number 71/2012. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) Type of Loss Category of Project Affected Person Compensation Entitlements Regulatory Reference Valuation will be conducted by the District/Province Forestry Land belonging to Government or government agencies refers Office. Normally it covers PSDH (Forest Resource Provision), to Law Number 2/2012 article 45, 46, and 47, and PR Number PNPB (Non-taxes of State Revenue) and other costs for survey 71/2012 article 82 or article 19. and delineation of the project area. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) 4.9. Stakeholder Engagement and Consultation A Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP) has been developed specifically for Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project consisting of stakeholders’ engagement programs and proposed grievance mechanism. The SEP has included a stakeholder analysis and proposed planning for on-going stakeholder engagement; which will be a supporting activity in line with the implementation of environmental and social management plan (ESMP), UKL- UPL monitoring, as well as during the land acquisition process. The SEP will be function as a living document which will need to be revised along with the Project development or changes. Moreover, the implementation of SEP will require a coordinated program for community engagement. Historical recent stakeholder engagement and the proposed on-going and future engagement associated with land acquisition are detailed in the following sub-sections. 4.9.1. Historical Engagement Activities In relation to land acquisition activities, SMI has started the process of stakeholder engagement for land acquisition preparation including coordination with local government, engaging village administrative office for the land use status, drawing participatory map together with local community during ESIA study for sensitivity map and direct interview with customary leaders to seek basic information regarding the land tenure and land status in the potential project location. There were several key issues raised during these historical community engagement activities. Some of the key issues regarding land acquisition included:  Land status in potential well pad location;  The existence of physical cultural resources e.g. old historical village, artefact and sacred stone;  Uncertainty of land acquisition process; and  Expectation from community leaders to disclose information and involving community for identification of potential well pad main and alternative location. Summaries of all engagement and consultation undertaken for the Project and key issues identified associated with land acquisition issues are presented in the following table. Table 4-2 Historical Stakeholder Engagement Relevant to Land Acquisition Time Stakeholders Consulted Key Issues Location of Interest 26 November Wae Sano Village Head Overview of Wae Sano community and village Wae Sano Village 2017 development 27 November Community Leader Nunang History of Nunang family, ancestors, archeological Wae Sano Village 2017 Clan/Family – Former of findings, historic village Head of Wae Sano Village Tu’a Golo Nunang (Well History of Mata Wae People, historic village, cultural Wae Sano Village pad B) asset and activity, land identification Local community of Wae Land cover and land status survey of well pad A, B, D, Wae Sano Village Sano village E 28 November Tu’a Golo Lempe (Well pad History of Lempe family, historic village, cultural asset Wae Sano Village 2017 A) and activity, land identification Tu’a Golo Dasak (Well pad History of Dasak family, historic village, cultural asset Wae Sano Village D) and activity, land identification Head of Sano Nggoang Consultation for the land owners regarding land Sano Nggoang Sub- Sub-district acquisition district Head of Local Government Consultation for the land owners regarding land Sano Nggoang Sub- Security Personnel acquisition district Local community of Sano Land cover and land status survey of access road Sano Nggoang Sub- Nggoang Sub-district improvement district 29 November Tu’a Golo Taal (Well pad E) History of Nggoang/Taal family, historic village, Sano Nggoang 2017 cultural asset and activity, land identification Village Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) 4.9.2. On-going and Future Engagement To address potential issues potentially occur associated with the Project land acquisition, future and on-going stakeholder engagement and consultations are proposed, for each different stage of the land acquisition process. The stages of the Project land acquisition includes planning, preparation, implementation and submission of land acquisition report require on-going engagement with various stakeholders involved in each of the stage, as described in the following table. Table 4-3 On-going and Future Stakeholder Engagement Topic and Information Stakeholders Approach and Methodology Timeframe Shared A. Identification of land Regional Land Acquisition  Socio-economic data of each of As early as possible; tenure and status Committee or Team (LAT), the affected people as a basis to intensive meeting Customary head (Tua Golo), identify vulnerability associated before land acquisition Head of Village, Head of Sub- with loss of agricultural land process district, and land owners  Further consultation with each of the Cultural Leaders/Family Clan owners of the proposed land is required to enable the land release, along with appropriate disclosure and consultation to all affected persons regarding the Project land acquisition process through stakeholder interview through one-on-one meeting or focus group discussion (FGD) B. Land lease option Planning compensation Customary head (Tua Golo), Consultation to ensure appropriate During land survey Head of Village, and land mechanism of compensation for land and inventory up to owners rental and same standard of fair completion of rental value across areas with clear compensation land classification which may payment, pre- influence differences in construction phase compensation value Negotiation and payment of Customary head (Tua Golo), Direct negotiation and payment to During land survey land rental compensation Head of Village, and land the PAP and inventory up to owners completion of compensation payment, pre- construction phase C. Land purchase option Planning and preparation Regional LAT, Customary head Public consultation with the identified Post land survey and stage of land acquisition (Tua Golo), Head of Village, affected land owners, involving and inventory, pre- process Head of Sub-district, and land cultural leaders regarding: construction phase owners  the result of land boundary survey and ownership inventory  compensation value and payment mechanism Implementation of Regional LAT (e.g. BPN, One-on-one meeting with Throughout land government land acquisition Provincial/Regency stakeholder and land owners acquisition process at Government Unit in charge of pre-construction of land affairs, village and sub- exploration facilities district government village), Tua Golo, land owners and land users (if any), including vulnerable groups Submission of land Regional LAT (e.g. BPN, Stakeholder meeting Post completion of acquisition completion Provincial/Regency land compensation for report Government Unit in charge of all required area land affairs, village and sub- district government village) D. Provision of livelihood Land owners and land users (if Consultation with the vulnerable and Pre-construction to restoration assistance for any), including vulnerable significantly people to identify construction stage of vulnerable and groups appropriate livelihood program the exploration significantly affected facilities people Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) In general, the following approaches will be used throughout the land acquisition process as part of the Project stakeholder engagement program:  Inform, consultation, and involve all PAPs in the decision making process of the land acquisition and compensation;  Collaboration and empowerment/development with the PAPs, and vulnerable and significantly affected people in particular; and  Consultation with stakeholders involved in the Project land acquisition process and figures/leaders that have a strategic role in the community. 4.9.3. Grievance Management Management of grievances has been proposed in the SEP – it has an important role in managing social issues and risks. The grievance mechanism is a way for the community to be able to provide aspiration, feedback or submit a grievance related to all project activities, both orally and in writing, in order to garner support for the implementation of project activities, including land acquisition activities. Generally, the Project grievance mechanism will be in line with GEUDP ESMF, which states that "the grievance mechanism establishes a procedure to receive and facilitate resolution of Affected Communities' concerns and grievances about the client's environmental and social performance". However, specifically for land acquisition matters, government mechanism will be used along with the general grievance mechanism for the whole Project activities. 4.9.3.1. Government Mechanism for Objection of the Land Acquisition and Project Development As in accordance to the Law 2/2012 and PR 71/2012, objections from the public and PAPs against land acquisition activities will be channelled through a judicial mechanism. In the process, there will be two possibilities of objections: the objection of the Plan Development Location; and the objection of compensation. The two processes are described here:  Objection of Plan of Development Location. Objection to the development location can be submitted to the Local Administrative Court no later than 30 days after the determination of the location is issued. The Administrative Court will decide on the acceptance or rejection of claims within 30 working days upon receipt of the lawsuit. An appeal process can be initiated if the objecting party is not satisfied with the decision of the Administrative Court. The process of submitting an appeal to the Indonesian Supreme Court can be submitted within 14 working days. The Supreme Court (MA) will provide a decision within 30 working days after the appeal is accepted and the decision of the Court will be the basis of whether or not the process of land acquisition activities can be conducted.  Objection of compensation. If no agreement is reached on the form and/or amount of compensation, the PAPs can file a complaint with the local (District) court no later than 14 working days after the appraisal; the court will decide the form and/or the amount of compensation within a period of 30 working days after the submission of objections. If PAPs object to the decision of the District Court, the PAPs may then appeal to the Supreme Court within a period of 14 working days after the decision of the District Court is issued. The Supreme Court will issue a decision within 30 working days after the appeal is received. The court decision will be the basis of payment of compensation to PAPs. 4.9.3.2. Grievance Redress Mechanism The Project grievances mechanism consisted of few steps, from grievance received and record, assessment, and resolution (see Figure 4-2), as follow:  The Project PMU and SMT will accept all comments and complaints associated with the Project, including land acquisition process. Any person or organisation may send comments and/or complaints in person to the SMT on-site representative or by phone.  SMI will keep a grievance log of all grievances (including those received and addressed by the LAT).  All comments and complaints will be responded verbally, in accordance with the preferred method of communication specified by the complainant, or by phone if contact details of the complainant are provided. Individuals who submit their comments or grievances have the right to request that their name be kept confidential. At all times, complainants are also able to seek legal remedies in accordance with the laws and regulations of Indonesia. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP)  The Project SMT will monitor the way in which grievances are being handled by their staff and/or the land acquisition team (LAT) and ensure they are properly addressed within deadlines specified above. Regular grievance management reports will be produced and included in the environmental and social management and monitoring implementation report. Figure 4-2 Grievance Redress Mechanism 4.10. Time Schedule 4.10.1. Cut-off Date The cut-off date is a date of completion of the census and assets inventory of PAPs, people occupying the project area after the cut-off date are not eligible for compensation and/or resettlement assistance. Similarly, fixed assets (such as building structures, crops, and tress) which have been established after the date of completion of the assets inventory, or an alternative mutually agreed date, will not be compensated. The cut -off date will be established and disclosed to the affected people when the LAT team announces the result of inventory data. This step is to anticipate issues on compensation matters, potential opportunistic behaviour and other potential negative impacts. 4.10.2. The Project Schedule for Land Acquisition The schedule for land acquisition is accordance with the updated schedule of Waesano Exploration Project as shown in the following table. Table 4-4 Land Acquisition Schedule Responsible No Activities Timeframe Budget Party 1 Discussion with MEMR on proposed 7 – 14 February 2018 PMU and SMT No budget leasing arrangement 2 Preliminary discussions with local 14 – 28 February 2018 PMU and SMT No budget authorities 3 Draft standard lease documentation 14 February – 7 March 2018 PMU and SMT No budget 4 Land acquisition drawings available 28 February 2018 PMU and SMT Construction Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) Responsible No Activities Timeframe Budget Party budget 5 Cadastral data collection 28 February – 7 March 2018 PMU and SMT TBC after final project design 6 Community consultation 7 – 14 March 2018 SMT and LAT TBC after final project design 7 Identification of land affected people 14 March – 24 April 2018 SMT and LAT TBC after final project design 8 Compensation discussions 25 April – 5 June 2018 SMT and LAT TBC after full LARAP study 9 Deliver negotiation result to MEMR 6 – 8 June 2018 SMT and LAT No budget 10 Payment of lease deposits 8 – 23 June 2018 SMT and LAT TBC after full LARAP study Source: PT SMI, March 2018 Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) 5. Socio-Economic Profile of the PAP and Land Tenure 5.1. Overview Generally within the area of interest for the Project current and future development, lands are owned individually by local community of Manggaraian ethnic. Specifically in Wae Sano Village, the locals identify themselves as Mata Wae community, a sub-ethnic group of the Manggarai people, with a clear territory (hamente) within the Sano Nggoang region and its surroundings. They generally have the same identity and traditions as other sub- ethnic groups in Manggarai. What distinguishes them is that they have dialects and some special traditions. But in particular they recognize themselves as Mata Wae people, which is a different identity from the larger Manggarai community. This indicates that the identity of local community of Wae Sano Village as Mata Wae is very strong as their identity base. For example, they acknowledge that as Mata Wae they have a special area called hamente Mata Wae, as their ancestor or old village (kampong) areas. From some local stories they mentioned that they never left Sano Nggoang lake areas and its surrounding. Thus, the area of Mata Wae people is special in the area of Lake Sano Nggoang. As discussed further in the Project Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) that is still being finalized at the time this report is developed, the Mata Wae community residing within the surrounding of Sano Nggoang Lake is not categorized as vulnerable indigenous people category defined in the World Bank Safeguard Policy which has been adopted in the GEUDP ESMF. Mata War community is identified as a dominant group within the affected area, while their cultural practices and traditional land tenure system are fading since the national government land certification program in the 1980s. This is as also has been confirmed in the GEUDP Environmental and Social Screening Report, dated 25 March 2016, which stated that no indigenous people residing within the Project area of interest. However, in relation to potential impacts on the Mata Wae remaining cultural heritage due to land acquisition, further consultation is still recommended (see Section 4.9 and 5.2). 5.2. Land Tenure within the Project Footprint In order to understand the social systems of Manggarai community or Mata Wae people, we cannot separate it by just their cultural landscape. Land for Manggaraian, including Mata Wae community, historically and culturally was very important and considered part of their individual and communal identity, as the mother of the community and source of life, and as a precondition for a village to exist. It is not only the land, but it is a cohesive system comprise of settlement, communities, natural environment, and the values that support it. The land ownership in Manggarai is generally known as Lodok, where the land and cultivation system is integral to the neighborhood and settlement system called golo. Golo is a centrally communal settlement unit. In each settlement unit, the Golo has its own production system and land use scheme called Lingko. The Manggaraian community does not only regard the land as a place for production or farming but they also see the land as part of the landscape that has its own autonomous power. A village traditional leader called Tu’a Golo would take control of land tenure in Manggarai including Wae Sano and Sano Nggoang Villages. Each village had under its tenure system named Lingko, which is a communal land management system based on the Golo (kampong) of the Manggarai Community. In the Lingko system, the land is divided equally by the village elderly or leaders to families who are deemed capable of managing and cultivating the land. The division of each plot of land to the families will form a spider web pattern. Frequently land areas were left fallow at any given time in the traditional slash-and-burn agricultural system. However, this traditional land tenure system has faded as they are now owned by households on individual/private basis. During the 1980s the land was divided with permanent ownership and cultivated land use. Nowadays, the land rights are permanently owned by individuals. Formal land status is shown through a Village Head Reference Letter for Land Ownership (Surat Keterangan Tanah or SKT). There were 16 Ha communal lands identified in Wae Sano Village, but are utilized for public areas – 6 Ha are used for schools and churches, while the remaining 10 Ha are uncultivated land located in Taal Sub -village of Wae Sano Village, however located outside the proposed Project footprint for Well Pad A, B, D, and E visited during the site survey undertaken in 22-30 Novermber 2017. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) Well pad drilling sites and their supporting facilities are located in several alternative locations in Wae Sano Village; while for the access road, the Project will use the Trans Flores Road from Labuan Bajo Port and then going through Sano Nggoang Sub-district road, traversing 3 villages of Wae Sano, Wae Lolos, and Golo Kodeng. Based on field survey observation and interviews with stakeholders during the 22-30 November 2017 site survey, the land use, status of ownership, and potential social issues for each of the proposed Project facilities locations are described in the following table, while land cover map and physical cultural resources (PCR) location map which was developed based on participatory mapping with the villagers, are presented in Figure 5-1 and Figure 5-2. Of note, as described earlier in Section 1.4, after AECOM site visit in November 2017, 3 alternatives well pads were proposed in 22 December 2017 – these new indicative well pads are relatively close to the previous design, however they were not surveyed during the November 2017 site visit. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) Table 5-1 Land Tenure within the Project Exploration Area Project Facility Location Land Cover/ Land Use Land Status/ Potential Issues Recommendation and Large Area Well Pad A (WS-A) Well pad A is located in Lempe Mixed plantation land such as  Based on interviews with the Tu’a Golo of The Tu’a Golo has indicated that the Sub-village about 1 km from the candlenut, coffee, cacao, coconut, Lempe, the land ownership is private/ identified CH object (Compang) has less  Phase 1: 0.57 Ha Wae Sano Village Office clove, and pepper community/individually-owned property. significant cultural value, therefore  Phase 2: 2.38 Ha  There is a cultural heritage (CH) area of relocation is possible. Compang located near the well pad drilling Further consultation with with the Tu’a location. Golo and the family clan owner of the  The location is 150 m from settlements in land is recommended to avoid or to Lempe Sub-village. ensure appropriate land acquisition/compensation mechanism. Well Pad B (WS-B)  The Well pad B drilling site is  Well pad B area is a mixed  According to Wae Sano Village Head and Tu’a  For the proposed WS-B area, the Alternative locations include located in Nunang Sub-village, plantation land such as candlenut, Golo of Nunang, the well pad B is located in Wae Sano Village Head did not well pad B1 and B4 Wae Sano Village coffee, cacao, coconut, clove, and the old village of the Nunang Sub-village (i.e. recommend using the land for  Well pad B1 is located around pepper locally called as Kampung Lingko). development in order to honor the  WS-B Phase 1: 0.68 Ha 260m East of well pad B,  Alternative well pad B1 area, based  Some historical relics such as Compang and ancestors of the Nunang people.  WS-B Phase 2: 2.05 Ha  Well pad B4 is located in Nunang on aerial photography data, the artefacts are found in the location. Further consultation is required to  WS-B1 Phase 2: 0.64 Ha Sub-village, Wae Sano Village location is in a region of dense  The well pad B located approximately 80 m avoid or to ensure appropriate land  WS-B4 Phase 2: 0.64 Ha about 300 meters (South-West) vegetation away from settlements of Nunang Sub-village. acquisition/compensation mechanism. from the Wae Sano Village Office.  Alternative well pad B4 is located in  Well pad B1 is indicated located within the  For WS-B1 area, since it is located a vacant land at the edge of the protected forest area, based on the letter of within forestry area, coordination with existing local road or about 200 m Head of BPKH Region IV dated 1 March 2018. the Task Force Unit for Forest from Lake Sano Nggoang However this needs to be confirmed with the Management of West Manggarai local forestry agency. Regency for a joint site visit.  Well pad B4 drilling pad is across an old village called Kampung Laja, located in Nunang and Lempe Sub-villages. Well Pad D (WS-D) Well pad D is located in Dasak Sub- Mixed plantation land mostly covered  Well pad D is indicated located within the Similar recommendation for WS-B1, to village, Wae Sano Village by candlenut protected forest area, based on the letter of undertake coordination with the Task  Phase 1: 1.03 Ha Head of BPKH Region IV dated 1 March 2018. Force Unit for Forest Management of  Phase 2: 1.35 Ha However this needs to be confirmed with the West Manggarai Regency for a joint site local forestry agency. visit.  It is located in relative safe distance from the nearest settlement of Dasak Sub-village i.e. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) Project Facility Location Land Cover/ Land Use Land Status/ Potential Issues Recommendation and Large Area 150 m.  Approximately 500 m to the south of the well pad drilling site, there is a customary area of the Wae Sano community namely Golo Lampang which is the first village of the ancestors of Mata Wae community. Well Pad E  Well pad E located in Taal Sub-  Observation in the field found some  Well pad E is private/ individually-owned Based on the results of interviews, Tu’a Alternative locations include village, Wae Sano Village old trees, among others, Bayan and property Golo of Taal did not recommend using well pad E (alternative)  The alternative well pad E is coconut trees  It is the location of ancient relics of the Taal the land for development in Kampung located between Taal and Dasak  Within the alternative well pad E, old village called Kampung Wewa. Based on a Wewa in order to honor the ancestors.  WS-E Phase 1: 0.79 Ha Sub-villages. based on aerial photography, the survey at the site, some old village relics were Further consultation may help the project  WS-E Phase 2: 3.15 Ha site is covered by plantation and dry found, i.e. the foundation stone of the building, understanding the cultural boundary of  WS-E (Alternative) Phase 1: land area former hedge, settlement patterns and public Kampung Wewa. 0.55 Ha space (Nantas) patterns.  WS-E (Alternative) Phase 2:  In addition, about 300 m to the southwest of 1.37 Ha the well pad boundary, there was a settlement and public cemetery of Taal Sub-village. Laydown Area Laydown area is located near well Refer to information presented for well pad A pad A 0.70 Ha Civil Contractor and Drilling Basecamps are located near well Refer to information presented for well pad A Contractor Base Camp pad A  Phase 1: 0.35 Ha  Phase 2: 0.53 Ha Spoil Disposal Area 1 Located near well pad D Refer to information presented for well pad D 1.05 Ha Spoil Disposal Area 2 Located near well pad E Refer to information presented for well pad E Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) Project Facility Location Land Cover/ Land Use Land Status/ Potential Issues Recommendation and Large Area 1.61 Ha Spoil Disposal Area 3 Located near well pad A Refer to information presented for well pad A 1.18 Ha Spoil Disposal Area 4-6 Along the proposed road widening Refer to information presented for the proposed road widening area along the sub-district road of Sano Nggoang area  Area 4: 0.54 Ha  Area 5: 0.37 Ha  Area 6: 0.50 Ha Drilling Water Supply No. 1 Located near alternative well pad A Refer to information presented for well pad A 0.21 Ha Drilling Water Supply No. 2 Located near alternative well pad E Refer to information presented for well pad E 0.24 Ha Widening of sharp bends at a Trans Flores National Road is the Based on aerial photography, land The Trans Flores road is managed/owned by Upgrading of roads in Trans Flores will few locations on the Trans main road from Labuan Bajo port use of the proposed widening area is government; therefore it isn’t likely to have require coordination with the National Flores National Road between before going south to the sub- covered by dry land forest land. significant social issues. Road Management Unit (Balai Labuan Bajo Port and junction district road of Sano Nggoang However the site survey identified that Pelaksanaan Jalan Nasional) in Kupang to local public road (at around the area land use is dominated by and/or Regional Planning Agency. KM30) shrubs. 0.04 Ha Widening of access road from Along the sub-district road of Sano Road widening area is dominated by  Based on interviews with the Sano Nggoang Direct consultation with land owners, the Trans Flores National Road Nggoang, traversing the 3 villages shrubs, and some are mixed Sub-district Head, the road upgrade land area coordinated with the local government intersection to the Project area of Wae Sano, Wae Lolos, and Golo plantation ownership status is mostly private/ agency e.g. Local Road Office Agency of interest, going through the Kodeng community/individually-owned property (Dinas Bina Marga), and the Sano sub-district road of Sano  There was no significant social issues found Nggoang Sub-district Head. Nggoang during the field survey in November 2017 0.70 Ha Source: Preliminary LARAP Site Visit, 22-30 November 2017 and Jacob’s Aerial Photography, 3 November 2017 Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Figure 5-1 Land Cover of the Project Proposed Land Acquisition Area Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 45 Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Figure 5-2 PCR Location in the Proposed Land Acquisition Area Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 46 Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) 5.3. Livelihood of the PAP The interview results found that the Wae Sano people have experienced major changes in their livelihoods in recent history. During the 1970s and 1980s, government policies changed their settlement and living arrangement system and centralized the expanses of rural settlements into kampong and villages. Previously they lived in a dispersed location within small clusters of settlement units on the basis of joint field management. The village administration forced the locals to move into villages and sub-villages (kampongs) as they are today (Wae Sano, Sano Nggoang, and Pulau Nuncung Villages). This change is followed by modifications in their livelihood patterns where gardening or subsistence farming are grouped and converted to long-term plantations, namely coconut and candlenut. They cultivated these crops in several areas in Sano Nggoang which used to be a savanna changed it to forest and plantation. For example, the Taal Sub-village was once a grassland area. Gradually they also abandoned their subsistence system and began growing produce for the market, which is prone to market rises and drops in crop value. Under such conditions the Wae Sano community is particularly vulnerable to market influence. They no longer have independence in the market. When previously the communities fulfilled their subsistence by cultivating the land, now their subsistence is based on the income generated by the sales of the candlenut crop or other plantation resources or by selling livestock. These livelihood changes altered the direction of their land management, from being communal land to individual ownership. Adat and customs are still being used as guidance, but the current land ownership system has affected communal bonding by reducing close relationships built by owning land communally. As presented in the previous Table 5-1, the land use within the proposed Project area of interest is predominated by commercial crops such as candlenut, areca nut, coffee, as well as to various food crops that are grown locally and used for domestic household consumption such as coconut, palm sugar, cacao, rice, corn, peanuts, soybean, and common vegetables such as chilli, tomatoes, sweet potato, bananas, and cassava. Observation and interviews with local communities during the baseline survey undertaken for ESIA document identified that the majority of the interviewed households are working as farmers as their primary livelihood. Only some of them were working in the service and private sector or entrepreneurship as the household’s main income source. This indicates that the community has a strong livelihood connection to agricultural land. However the baseline also identified that these community plantations are considered small -scale undeveloped plantations, still managed traditionally within the family (i.e. minimum used of migrant labours). Therefore, in addition to their primary income, most households would also have a secondary income source from casual labour as they cannot depend only on the land. To sustain livelihoods, communities are also engaged in small- scale land-related activities, generally for secondary income sources, such as small retail shops, homestays, raising chickens and ducks, other animal husbandry, including buffalo, cows, pigs and goats. These indicate community alternative source of income not solely depend on agricultural activities. Further details livelihood data of each of the affected household will be required to be obtained directly from the PAP to identify the loss of households’ productive assets. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) 6. Organisational Responsibilities Referring to Law Number 2 of 2012 and GEUDP ESMF, the following organizational arrangement is suggested for the Project’s land acquisition implementation, as shown in Table 6-1. Table 6-1 Roles and Responsibility of the Project Land Acquisition Process No Stage Responsibility Roles 1 Planning  The Project Land Team Prepare the Land Procurement planning document based on (within the SMT/ Safeguard Law No. 2 of 2012 at the planning stage and adjust to the Team) Spatial Plan of the Region and the medium and long term  Province/Regional Land development plan. At this stage this process produces an Procurement Committee (or AMDAL or UKL/UPL and Land Procurement Planning Land Acquisition Team/LAT) Documents. 2 Preparation Preparatory Team consisted of: The preparatory stage should be through notification of a  The Project Land Team development plan or project, this notice may be socialized, (within the SMT/ Safeguard face-to-face or through a notification letter that can be Team); and through direct mail or through print media and local  Provincial/Regional LAT, government websites. Subsequently, initial data collection of which will be established by the project plan is in the form of initial data collection of the Regent/Regent after the eligible parties and land procurement object, in which the planning phase is intended data covers the holder of land rights, management completed, and the location holder and nadzir for wakaf land, the owner of the former permits is approved customary land, the customary law community, the controlling party the right to state land in good faith and the holder of land rights (individuals / legal entities) as well as owners of buildings, plants and other objects related to the land. At the preparatory stage, a public consultation of the development plan will be held with a recorded attendance list. In the public consultation, the preparatory team explains the purpose and objectives of the development plan, the process of land procurement, determines the value of the change of profit, the form of loss and the rights and obligations of the party entitled. Public consultation is also a way to inventory any problems or objections and to classify the objection (type and reason for objections, objections and suggestions of the opposing parties). 3 Implementation The implementation is organized During implementation stage, all inventory and identification by the Provincial/Regional LAT of affected land is assessed, negotiated and paid for. Compensation will be provided for those that are physically and economically impacted by the project. This stage should hold deliberations with the affected landowners of the project with respect to the change of income. 4 Submission of The Project Land Team (within After the land acquisition is finalized and the submission of Land the SMT/ Safeguard Team) certificates is completed, the Project proponent can begin to Acquisition implement the development. Completion Report 5 Monitoring and The Project Land Team (within Monitoring of the land acquisition process, including Evaluation the SMT/ Safeguard Team) evaluation toward the livelihood restoration of the Project affected people/ households. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) 7. Cost and Budget 7.1. Compensation Cost 7.1.1. Estimated Compensation for Well Pad Area and Its Supporting Facility Based on interview with stakeholders, it was identified that the range of land price based on NJOP and market 2 price is IDR 10,000 to 15,000 per m or IDR 100 million to 150 million per Ha – differences in land price will depend on location of land. However, the price of land and other compensation such as for crops, trees, structure, and other affected assets shall be provided based on land survey through the independent and certified public appraisal office (KJPP) under the Provincial/Regional LAT. The main option for the Project land acquisition is to rent the required land area (with purchase option for the future stage of the Project exploitation phase). Since land rental was not a common land transaction in the area, there was no benchmark or market value on compensation for lease on private land ownership. Therefore the average cost for land lease is based on the agreement with the land owners. If there are land areas identified owned by the regional government of West Manggarai, then the land rental should refer to the Head of West Manggarai Regency Decree Number 16 of 2015 concerning Lease for Land and Property Owned by West Manggarai Regency. If the Project decides to purchase land area for well pads and supporting facilities in the future, the estimated cost for 22.12 hectare area of land is IDR 2.212 billion (minimum) to IDR 3.318 billion (maximum) based on current market price (see Table 7-1). Meanwhile, compensation for plant/trees/crops, the basic price will follow Law Number 2/2012 concerning compensation or following the GEUDP ESMF on Resettlement Policy, as defined in Section 4.8 of Entitlement Matrix, which consider seasons lost from the plants while the replacement plants reach their full production. 7.1.2. Estimated Compensation for Road Widening Area Land acquisition process for the proposed road widening area will be conducted through land purchase. Since the potentially affected area is located within the same sub-district, estimated compensation is calculated at the 2 same land price per m or per ha with the area of well pad and its supporting facility. Estimated value is provided in the following table. Table 7-1 Assumption for Land Purchase Compensation Compensation Cost of Land Purchase based on NJOP and Market Price (IDR) No Project Facilities Large Area (m2) Minimum Maximum (IDR 10,000 per m2) (IDR 15,000 per m2) All well pad and its supporting 1 221,200 2,212,000,000 3,318,000,000 facilities (Phase 1 & 2) Road Upgrade – Widening of some sharp bends of the Trans 2 Flores National Road from Labuan 400 4,000,000 6,000,000 Bajo to the junction of local public road of Sano Nggoang Road Upgrade – Widening of access road from the Trans Flores 3 7,000 70,000,000 105,000,000 National Road intersection to the Project area of interest Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) 7.2. Livelihood Restoration Budget As mentioned earlier in Section 4 of this document, in addition to government requirements, GEUDP ESMP requires compensation to consider the livelihood restoration of the affected people. Should this not cover in the calculation of the rental or purchase value by the government team, additional measures may be applied such as through provision of livelihood restoration program. The implementation of the program could be aligned with the social and environmental responsibility program of the Project. This is observed by Indonesia Law 40 or 2007 for all companies having its business activities in the field of and/or related to natural resources shall be obliged to perform its Social and Environmental Responsibility. 7.3. Budget Planning In relation to funding for land acquisition activities based on the National Regulation, there are two sources of budget for development of public interest from national or local government budgets:  If associated with funding from the state budget, then it is set by the Minister of Finance Regulation Number 13/PMK.02/2013, while the regional budget is set by the Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 72 in 2012; and  Internal State Owned Enterprise (SOE) budget i.e. at the current Waesano Geothermal Exploration stage from PT SMI. Funding of land acquisition for public projects is fully allocated by relevant agencies in accordance with the prevailing regulation. The budget for land acquisition based on Law Number 2 of 2012 is intended for planning activities, preparation, submission of results, administration and management, and socialization. Funding for land acquisition for public projects will be made by the relevant agencies and reflected in the budget documents. Meanwhile, operational budgeting of land acquisition activities is regulated by Regulation of Ministry of Home Affairs Number 72 of 2012, Regulation of Ministry of Finance Number 13/PMK.02/2013, as well as Circular letter of Head of BPN Number 1/SE-100/I/2013 about Imposition of tariffs on non-tax revenue. The regulation of the Ministry of Home Affairs regulates the operational cost to support implementation of land acquisition, and the Ministry of Finance regulation refers to instructions for using operational funds and support in the administration of funds for land acquisition for construction in the public interest. As for livelihood restoration budget could be sourced from the allocated budget for implementing the corporate social and environmental responsibility, obligated by Indonesia law and regulation (see Section 3.1), by prioritising the land acquisition PAP as program receiver and ensuring the program to focus of livelihood improvement of all project affected community/villages. Regulatory framework for budget planning specifically for public interest development project is provided in the following table. Table 7-2 Land Acquisition Budget Planning Law/ Regulation Description Article 52 of Law Number (1) Funding of Land Acquisition for Public Interest comes from the State Budget 2/2012 (APBN) and / or the Regional Budget (APBD). (2) In the case of institutions that require land such as State Owned Legal Entity / State Owned Enterprises that has been given special assignments, funding comes from internal sources or other sources in accordance to legislation. (3) Special Assignment as referred in article (2) should be in accordance with laws and regulation provision. Article 116 of PR Number Funding of Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest is conducted by the 71/2012 institution that requires land, outlined in the budget document in accordance with the laws and regulations provision. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) Law/ Regulation Description Article 117 of PR Number Funding for Land Acquisition for Public interest comes from the State Budget and / or 71/2012 Regional Budget. Article 118 of PR Number (1) In the case of Land Acquisition conducted by State Owned Legal Entity / State- 71/2012 Owned Enterprises that have been given special assignments, funding comes from internal sources or other sources in accordance to legislation provision. (2) Special Assignment as referred in article (1) should be in accordance with laws and legislation provision. Article 120 of PR Number Further provisions on operating and supporting costs are sourced from the State revenue 71/2012 and expenditure budget set by the Regulation of the Minister of Finance. Cost of Land Acquisition Regulation of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia Number governed by Ministry of 13/PMK.02/2013 on Operating Costs and Supporting Costs of Land Acquisition for Finance (MOF) Regulation Development in the Public Interest comes from State Revenue and Expenditure Budget. Number 13/PMK.02/2013 Annex 2 of by MOF (1) Operating and Supporting Costs For Activity during Implementation Stage and Regulation Number Delivery of Results 13/PMK.02/2013 (2) Operating Costs and Supporting Costs for activities during implementation stage and delivery of results are determined by the calculation starting from 4% (four percent) of the value of the land restitution less than or equal to IDR 10,000,000,000, - (ten billion rupiahs) first and then the percentage of follows:  Compensation up to 10 billion = 4% (max 400m)  Compensation 10b – 15b -> (max operational cost of 10b)+(3% x 5b) – max 450m  Compensation 15b – 30b -> (max operational cost of 15b)+(2% x 15b) – max 850m  Compensation 30b – 55b -> (max operational cost of 30b)+(1% x 25b) – max 1.1b  Compensation 55b – 105b -> (max operational cost of 55b)+(0.5% x 50b) – max 1.35b (3) Compensation over 105b -> (max operational cost of 105b)+(0.25% x 100b) – max 1.6b. Cost of Land Acquisition Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia governed by MOHA Number 72 of 2012 on Operating Costs and Supporting Cost of Land Acquisition for Regulation Number 72/2012 Development in the Public Interest should come from Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget. Cost of Land Acquisition in (1) Based on the submission of the Land Procurement Agency that requires land to the article 51 of BPN Regulation Chairman of the Land Acquisition activity in accordance with the provisions of Number 5/2012 (Technical Article 52 of Presidential Regulation Number 71/ 2012 on the Implementation of Guideline of Land Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest, the Chairman of the Land Acquisition Implementation) Acquisition activity propose the costs of the land acquisition activity to the institution that requires land. (2) Costs required for land acquisition in accordance with the activities as referred in Article 5 of this Regulation include:  Preparation of implementation;  Inventory and identification;  Determination of assessors;  Deliberation to determine the forms of compensation;  Delivery of compensation;  Delivery of compensation in special circumstances;  Custody of compensation; Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) Law/ Regulation Description  The release of land acquisition object;  Termination of the legal relationship between the entitled parties and the object of land acquisition; and  Documentation of maps and data administration nominative list of land acquisition. (3) In addition to the cost referred in article (2), the cost of socialization, administration and management, monitoring and evaluation and delivery of results of land acquisition activity is required. (4) The cost referred in article (2) and (3) could be:  Spending on goods; and / or  Capital expenditure. Based on the GEUDP ESMF dated December 2016, SMI allocated budget estimation of USD 400,000 9 (approximately IDR 5.3 billion ) for land transactions and associated compensation for project affected people and LARAP implementation of all GEUDP project. Meanwhile, specifically for Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project, the followings budget has been planned:  For Phase I (slimhole drilling) of land acquisition, SMI has allocated approximately USD 65,000 (approximately IDR 862 million); and  USD 4,000 (approximately IDR 53 million) for Phase II (standard hole drilling). Details of the budget allocation will need to be updated once the inventory of all affected assets and socio- economic data of all affected people/households including non-titled land users are available, referring to Section 4.8 Entitlement Framework. 9 Exchange Transaction of Bank of Indonesia per January 22, 2018 Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) 8. Monitoring and Reporting The Project shall monitor and measure the progress of implementation of its land acquisition process. The extent of monitoring activities will be commensurate with the project’s risks and impacts. In addition to recording the progress in compensation payment and other resettlement activities, the project will prepare monitoring reports to ensure that the implementation of the resettlement plan has produced the desired outcomes. The Project has also planned to retain qualified and experienced external experts to verify the Project’s land acquisition monitoring information. The external experts engaged by the project will advise on safeguard compliance issues, and if any significant involuntary resettlement issues are identified, a corrective action plan will be prepared to address such issues. Until such planning documents are formulated, disclosed and approved, the Project will not proceed with implementing the specific project components for which involuntary resettlement impacts are identified. The purpose of monitoring and reporting is to: (a) Comply with national regulation and World Bank’s OP 4.12 which has been adopted in the GEUDP ESMF; (b) Determine effectiveness of institutional arrangements; (c) Identify problems and remedial actions if any; (d) Identify methods of responding immediately to resolve or mitigate problems; (e) Verify if the standard of living of displaced persons are restored or improved; (f) Assess sustainability of income restoration program; and (g) Determine if human and financial resources allocated are adequate and effective. Monitoring of the land acquisition and resettlement implementation will typically focus on the following aspects:  Verification of compliance of implementation;  Restoration of living standards/livelihoods;  Levels of displaced person’s satisfaction;  Effectiveness of resettlement planning which identifies the strengths and weaknesses of the implementation in terms of achieving equitable resettlement outcomes, and benefit to the displaced persons;  Resettlement impacts – includes impacts on the displaced person’s social economic situation, on public utilities and on institutions and staff particularly of mass organizations; and  Any pending issues: complaints, non-compliance issues. The Project will prepare a semi-annual monitoring report that describes the progress of the implementation of resettlement activities and any compliance issues and livelihood restoration of the PAP. The report will closely follow the involuntary resettlement monitoring indicators agreed at the time of resettlement plan approval. Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Action Plan (LARAP) Project number: JKTD17002 9. Bibliography Jacobs. (2017). Civil Preliminary Site Visit Report. Jakarta: Jacobs. BAPPEDA Kabupaten Manggarai Barat. 2012. Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kabupaten Manggarai Barat Statistics of Manggarai Barat Regency. 2015a. Manggarai Barat in Figures 2015. Maribeth Erb, “Adat Revivalism in Western Flores”, in Jamie S. Davidson and David Henley (ed), The Revival of Tradition in Indonesian Politics’ the Deployment of Adat from Colonialism to Indigenism, Routledge – Contemporary Southeast Asia Series, 2007. Lawang, Robert M.Z (1999), Konflik Tanah Di Manggarai, Floret Barat, UI Press Lawang, Robert M.Z (1989), Stratifikasi Sosial di Cancar-Manggarai Flores Barat, Disertasi, Jurusan Sosiologi, Universitas Indonesia Verheijen, Jilis (1991) Manggarai dan Wujud Tertinggi, terjemahaan Alex Beding an Marcel Beding (Jakarta: LIPI - RUL) Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 54 Preliminary Land Acquisition and Resettlement PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) Action Plan (LARAP) Project number: JKTD17002 PT AECOM Indonesia South Quarter Building Tower-C 5th-floor Jl. R.A. Kartini Kav.8 Jakarta Selatan Jakarta - Indonesia aecom.com Prepared For: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM 55 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) PT AECOM Indonesia South Quarter Building Tower C, 5th Floor Jl. R.A. Kartini Kav. 8 Cilandak Barat Jakarta 12430 aecom.com Prepared for: PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (Persero) AECOM N