Skip to Main Navigation

Evaluating workfare when the work is unpleasant : evidence for India's national rural employment guarantee scheme (English)

Prevailing practices in evaluating workfare programs have ignored the disutility of the type of work done, with theoretically ambiguous implications for the impacts on poverty. In the case of India's National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, past assessments have relied solely on household consumption per person as the measure of economic welfare. The paper generalizes this measure to allow for the disutility of casual manual work. The new measure is calibrated to the distribution of the preference parameters implied by maximization of an idiosyncratic welfare function assuming that there is no rationing of the available work. The adjustment implies a substantially more "poor-poor" incidence of participation in the scheme than suggested by past methods. However, the overall impacts on poverty are lower, although still positive. The main conclusions are robust to a wide range of alternative parameter values and to allowing for involuntary unemployment using a sample of (self-declared) un-rationed workers.


  • Author

    Alik Lagrange,Arthur, Ravallion,Martin

  • Document Date


  • Document Type

    Policy Research Working Paper

  • Report Number


  • Volume No


  • Total Volume(s)


  • Country


  • Region

    South Asia,

  • Disclosure Date


  • Disclosure Status


  • Doc Name

    Evaluating workfare when the work is unpleasant : evidence for India's national rural employment guarantee scheme

  • Keywords

    consumption;manual labor;household consumption per capita;participation rate;targeting performance;measure of poverty;daily wage rate;impact on poverty;square poverty gap;distribution of consumption;Poverty & Inequality;development research group;cumulative distribution function;real wage rate;rural labor market;increase in inequality;household consumption expenditure;consumption of commodity;measurement of poverty;poverty gap index;poverty line using;benefits of participation;linear regression model;decomposable poverty measure;incidence of poverty;depth of poverty;level of consumption;poverty impact;labor supply;wage labor;involuntary unemployment;Poverty measures;summary statistic;casual work;headcount index;welfare measurement;job satisfaction;survey data;consumption distribution;workfare program;economic welfare;long hour;development study;welfare gains;wage work;Rural Poor;parameter value;high wage;welfare indicator;fighting poverty;welfare function;rural area;raw data;scatter plot;social program;Public Spending;survey instrument;standard deviation;household weight;base year;survey sample;measured inequality;Population Growth;sampling frame;sampling design;work requirement;household size;wage increase;welfare effect;cultural change;open access;official poverty;total wage;relief work;household expenditure;agricultural labor;gross wage;real consumption;horizontal axis;evaluation method;great depression;consumption aggregate;adult male;adult female;survey design;income gain;working day;household survey;positive value;transfer benefit;minimum wage;farm productivity;rice price;weight gain;standard for method;welfare consequence;regular job;private market;statistical association;public scheme;subsidiary activity;measuring welfare;social group;downward adjustment;regression function;household characteristic;demographic characteristic;labor history;result data;development policy;wealth distribution;measure of use;measured poverty;



Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)

  • Official PDF
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.


Alik Lagrange,Arthur Ravallion,Martin

Evaluating workfare when the work is unpleasant : evidence for India's national rural employment guarantee scheme (English). Policy Research working paper ; no. WPS 6272 Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group.