Skip to Main Navigation

Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms : in search of spillovers through backward linkages (English)

Many countries compete against one another in attracting foreign investors by offering ever more generous incentive packages and justifying their actions with the productivity gains that are expected to accrue to domestic producers from knowledge externalities generated by foreign affiliates. Despite this being hugely important to public policy choices, there is little conclusive evidence indicating that domestic firms benefit from foreign presence in their sector. It is possible, though, that researchers have been looking for foreign direct investment (FDI) spillovers in the wrong place. Multinationals have an incentive to prevent information leakage that would enhance the performance of their local competitors in the same industry but at the same time may want to transfer knowledge to their local suppliers in other sectors. Spillovers from FDI may be, therefore, more likely to take place through backward linkages-that is, contacts between domestic suppliers of intermediate inputs and their multinational clients-and thus would not have been captured by the earlier literature. This paper focuses on the understudied issue of FDI spillovers through backward linkages and goes beyond existing studies by shedding some light on factors driving this phenomenon. It also improves over existing literature by addressing several econometric problems that may have biased the results of earlier research. Based on a firm-level panel data set from Lithuania, the estimation results are consistent with the existence of productivity spillovers. They suggest that a 10 percent increase in the foreign presence in downstream sectors is associated with 0.38 percent rise in output of each domestic firm in the supplying industry. The data indicate that these spillovers are not restricted geographically, since local firms seem to benefit from the operation of downstream foreign affiliates on their own, as well as in other regions. The results further show that greater productivity benefits are associated with domestic-market, rather than export-oriented, foreign affiliates. But no difference is detected between the effects of fully-owned foreign firms and those with joint domestic and foreign ownership. The findings of a positive correlation between productivity growth of domestic firms and the increase in multinational presence in downstream sectors should not, however, be interpreted as a call for subsidizing FDI. These results are consistent with the existence of knowledge spillovers from foreign affiliates to their local suppliers, but they may also be a result of increased competition in upstream sectors. While the former case would call for offering FDI incentive packages, it would not be the optimal policy in the latter. Certainly more research is needed to disentangle these two effects.


  • Author


  • Document Date


  • Document Type

    Policy Research Working Paper

  • Report Number


  • Volume No


  • Total Volume(s)


  • Country


  • Region

    Europe and Central Asia,

  • Disclosure Date


  • Doc Name

    Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms : in search of spillovers through backward linkages

  • Keywords

    Trade and Foreign Direct Investment;foreign presence;small and medium size enterprise;foreign affiliate;downstream sector;direct foreign investment;panel data set;share of export;number of workers;machinery and equipment;foreign equity participation;quality of data;overseas development council;refined petroleum product;standard financial statement;foreign equity share;academy of science;total factor productivity;movement of labor;number of scientists;share of investment;proportion of sector;correction of errors;transition economy;Transition economies;firm productivity;horizontal spillover;positive correlation;productivity spillovers;standard error;foreign ownership;multinational corporation;fixed effect;incentive package;estimation result;positive spillover;knowledge spillover;foreign investor;domestic supplier;public policy;optimal policy;intermediate product;increased competition;productivity growth;productivity effect;downward bias;aggregate variable;enterprise survey;vertical linkage;econometric problem;domestic producer;foreign company;significant correlation;multinational client;empirical study;firm exit;study including;local market;parent company;data limitation;positive externality;productivity gain;Technology Transfer;transnational corporation;knowledge externality;information leakage;transport equipment;wood product;optical instrument;summary statistic;electrical machinery;production function;privatization process;foreign share;statistical significance;food product;intermediate input;empirical evidence;increase productivity;unbalanced panel;local competitors;sectoral distribution;productivity benefit;projects lead;technological capability;small country;qualitative variable;radical change;foreign participation;downstream industry;manufacturing sector;firm entry;discussion papers;global economy;tax environment;firm size;gross profit;increasing return;estimation procedure;input supply;multilateral development;total output;Learning and Innovation Credit;export catalysts;international economics;chemical product;shared ownership;metal product;plastic products;industrial restructuring;trade theory;supply chain;statistical system;manufacturing industry;empirical result;financial constraint;sampling technique;Tax Holiday;missing value;special treatment;firm sale;estimation strategy;government action;import liberalization;intellectual property;capital participation;product quality;production management;increased demand;present value;Financial Sector;quantitative information;leather products;foreign supplier;pioneering work;market economy;tax concession;real output;finished goods;national treatment;domestic industry;unskilled worker;retail trade;financial intermediation;research base;average productivity;imported inputs;local partner;production process;international production;raw material;Industrialized countries;direct payment;theoretical model;industrialized country;equity stake;local source;productivity increase;estimation method;scale economy;competition effect;high wage;skilled labor;transition country;transition countries;firm level;welfare implication;million people;technology spillover;global market;quality requirement;production input;aggregate market;output growth;basic specification;technological opportunity;coefficient estimate;exogenous variable;domestic plant;basic model;unobserved variable;summer camp;



Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)

  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.



Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms : in search of spillovers through backward linkages (English). Policy, Research working paper series ; no. WPS 2933 Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group.