Skip to Main Navigation

Lebanon - First Municipal Infrastructure Project (English)

Ratings for the First Municipal Infrastructure Project for Lebanon were as follows: outcomes were satisfactory; risk to development outcome was moderate; Bank performance was satisfactory; and borrower performance was also satisfactory. Some lessons learned includes: keeping the scope of the project straightforward and simple while including some forward looking, developmental elements, and allowing for maximum feasible flexibility of implementation greatly facilitates successful implementation of projects of such nature. The project's design included flexible and adaptable elements that helped it thrive in difficult circumstances and laid the groundwork for continued improvements to municipal finances and overall municipal strengthening. Taking advantage of existing implementation capacity and extending the life of an already proven and tested Project Completion Unit (PCU) rather than creating new structures, helped improve the success of the project in a difficult environment. This project built on what was already there and working, rapid response from the Bank project staff based in Lebanon for a large part, contributed to the success of project. They were able to quickly respond to problems when they arose and facilitated project restructuring as needed. The success of the project is linked to the overall effort that was sustained over time, in a context of political turmoil and uncertainty. Whilst focusing on emergency needs, the project was also able to address capacity building issues and to set the basis for effective municipal strengthening and decentralization. It also contributed to improving the life of people on a daily basis. Such an approach can only be developed and implemented over time as it is essential to establish meaningful reforms and achieve concrete progress on the ground. The short time allotted to the preparation of emergency operations, coupled with a rapid preparation process may require further development of the monitoring and evaluation framework at the early stages of implementation. The Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) framework is a key element of the project design which can only be well apprehended and developed after the initial steps of implementation of emergency reconstruction projects. It then can be at the core of project monitoring.

Details

  • Document Date

    2012/10/30

  • Document Type

    Implementation Completion and Results Report

  • Report Number

    ICR2491

  • Volume No

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • Country

    Lebanon,

  • Region

    Middle East and North Africa,

  • Disclosure Date

    2012/11/01

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Doc Name

    Lebanon - First Municipal Infrastructure Project

  • Keywords

    infrastructure and service delivery;Indicator Baseline;Quality Assessment of Lending Portfolio;Municipalities;preparation of bidding documents;access to public facilities;Environmental and Social Safeguard;restoration of water supply;ip disbursements archived;access to basic service;Fiscal and Debt Sustainability;built up area;number of beneficiaries;central government transfer;water and sewerage;intermediate outcome;Social Safety Nets;adaptation to change;Exchange Rates;accountability of municipality;quality of work;agricultural research center;sewage treatment plant;central government revenue;cost benefit analysis;quality at entry;Rule of Law;operations and maintenance;outputs by components;risk of accident;distribution of wealth;access to water;capacity building component;local government official;kilometers of road;infrastructure and services;lack of investment;source of funding;service delivery system;economic development opportunity;industry and trade;affordable health care;income generation activities;repair of infrastructure;water pumping station;cost of construction;Environmental Management Plan;quality control procedure;increase in prices;cessation of hostility;capacity building intervention;lack of focus;retaining wall;storm water;street light;Municipal Finance;Public Infrastructure;public market;municipal building;municipal revenue;municipal sector;economic recovery;local economy;direct beneficiaries;external factor;equity indicator;construction sector;municipal election;financial operation;local infrastructure;transportation cost;civil unrest;basic infrastructure;local development;adequate infrastructure;physical work;municipal management;rehabilitation need;municipal authority;infrastructure reconstruction;agricultural product;illegal construction;beneficiary municipality;construction material;hands-on training;municipal asset;municipal property;Project Monitoring;high poverty;political tension;social influence;Civil War;religious group;investment rise;procurement activities;Financial Stability;construction supervision;external partner;investment planning;artisanal production;product market;municipal fund;procurement capacity;investment choice;local resident;crop disease;approval process;own-source revenue;rental value;emergency operation;financial autonomy;comparable data;increased revenue;agricultural center;medium-term perspective;municipal dependence;recovery effort;community center;city environment;municipal autonomy;political instability;increased security;road repair;project impact;development path;procurement transaction;transportation capability;project execution;consulting service;severe shortage;core indicator;construction work;regional context;security threat;beneficiary assessment;Consulting services;primary author;institution building;reconstruction activities;social impact;additional expense;internal conflict;counterpart funding;loan proceeds;municipal staff;political situation;development partner;recovery activity;monitoring indicator;international community;Water Network;project approval;infrastructure component;field visits;representative sample;financial resource;secondary road;municipal institution;regional infrastructure;mitigation measure;loan experience;reconstruction assistance;emergency procedure;supplemental financing;loan amounting;Economic Management;human capital;poverty effect;infrastructure program;rehabilitation component;regional economy;local revenue;housing sector;intergovernmental transfer;financial flow;Property tax;tax base;municipal government;refugee camp;emergency reconstruction;financial sustainability;disbursement profile;access road;primary service;road safety;sewer network;capacity strengthening;urban roads;municipal area;finance market;water reservoir;financing source;Private School;infrastructure facility;local investment;living condition;good governance;monthly reports;gender disparity;regional disparity;economic infrastructure;Environmental Assessment

Downloads

COMPLETE REPORT

Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)

  • Official PDF
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.

Citation

Lebanon - First Municipal Infrastructure Project (English). Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/211461468276895862/Lebanon-First-Municipal-Infrastructure-Project