Skip to Main Navigation

Kyrgyz Republic - Public expenditure review policy notes : social assistance (Russian)

This note proposes a reform agenda to address the challenges facing the system of social assistance This will require: i) a progressive shift of public expenditure toward pro-poor programs; ii) improving coherence and complementarity among social protection programs, and iii) making social assistance programs more inclusive and responsive. The structure of this chapter is as follows. The next two sections provide an overview of poverty and the composition and trends in non-contributory social protection expenditure in the Kyrgyz Republic. The fourth section looks at performance of the social assistance expenditure in the Kyrgyz Republic and shows that while spending has increased significantly in recent years, its performance in terms of coverage and targeting of the poor, as well as in terms of its impact on poverty remains modest. Other issues, which are important to take into account in the process of improving effectiveness of social assistance expenditure, are discussed in the following section. The last section concludes by summarizing key challenges and proposing recommendations for system reform, as well as areas requiring further research and analysis.

Details

  • Author

    Mamadaliev,Erkin

  • Document Date

    2014/05/01

  • Document Type

    Policy Note

  • Report Number

    89022

  • Volume No

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • Country

    Kyrgyz Republic,

  • Region

    Europe and Central Asia,

  • Disclosure Date

    2015/06/15

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Doc Name

    Kyrgyz Republic - Public expenditure review policy notes : social assistance

  • Keywords

    people with special need;social assistance program;weights and measure;data needs;extreme poverty;extreme poverty line;household consumption per capita;pension and social assistance;impact on poverty reduction;terms of poverty reduction;terms of poverty status;headcount index of poverty;number of beneficiaries;Social Protection Benefits;early retirement;cash compensation;social protection program;per capita income;social assistance system;social transfer;social assistance spending;central government budget;social protection expenditure;decline in poverty;share of benefit;flat rate benefit;guaranteed minimum income;categories of beneficiaries;people with disability;social protection spending;absence of transfer;targeted social assistance;households with income;social insurance contribution;social insurance scheme;increases in benefit;reduction of poverty;cash transfer program;poverty reduction impact;high growth rate;Public Expenditure Policy;social protection policy;access to certification;Exchange Rates;share of transfer;early retirement pension;size of pension;social insurance program;allocation of energy;alleviate Extreme Poverty;person with disability;high exclusion error;number of workers;vulnerable population group;social protection system;general price subsidy;global economic crisis;services for disabled;living in poverty;high poverty rate;high poverty incidence;cost of living;social protection beneficiaries;social insurance transfers;national postal service;public investment management;delivery of payment;Wage Bill Management;social protection transfer;households with pensioner;families with child;central government agency;household welfare indicator;pace of increase;categorical social assistance;public works program;absolute poverty;poverty gap;beneficiary household;welfare quintile;high altitude;energy tariff;lifeline tariff;bottom quintile;poor household;electricity tariff;poverty impact;poverty estimate;early retiree;total consumption;general revenues;energy price;program beneficiary;cash benefit;pension scheme;coverage rate;performance criteria;institutional care;unemployment benefit;food price;benefit amount;residential consumer;cost efficiency;free transportation;state budget;compensation amount;electricity subsidies;inclusion error;geographic area;poverty index;compensation measures;living standard;financial flow;administrative datum;household survey;rural area;old-age pension;local self government;headcount rate;income supplement;solid fuel;administrative cost;housing subsidy;Temporary Work;social worker;unmet demand;vulnerable family;low-income family;budget revenue;evaluation framework;reform measure;Public Spending;consumer choice;cash payment;pension benefit;categorical targeting;budget envelope;poor child;utility bill;pension system;reduced poverty;vulnerable household;social integration;adverse incentive;natural disaster;employment opportunities;employment opportunity;mitigation measure;disability insurance;school feeding;smaller share;severe disability;eligibility criterion;intergovernmental transfer;social pension;donor support;large transfer;higher growth;local budget;program account;monetary equivalent;Price Subsidies;Health Service;budget allocation;delivery mechanism;disability status;social allowance;Rural Poor;essential services;gap index;poverty severity;poverty source;urban population;fee waiver;disability benefit;social program;subsidy scheme;budget outlay;regional disparity;contributory program;data exchange;target system;economic shock;annex annex;child benefit;average spending;program administration;poverty poverty;public workfare;global economy;tariff increase;administrative support;demographic characteristic;global food;internal shocks;life situation;family environment;social impact;Equal Opportunity;social life;social infrastructure;social rehabilitation;nonfood item;roumeen islam;fiscal saving;fuel price;housing cost;poverty distribution;vulnerable group;household composition

Downloads

COMPLETE REPORT

Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)

  • Official PDF
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.

Citation

Mamadaliev,Erkin

Kyrgyz Republic - Public expenditure review policy notes : social assistance (Russian). Public Expenditure Review (PER) Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/232171467986292211/Kyrgyz-Republic-Public-expenditure-review-policy-notes-social-assistance