Most development objectives focus on the well-being of individuals. Policies are targeted to increase the percentage of individuals who avoid poverty, who can read, who are free from hunger and illness, or who can find gainful employment. Individual welfare, however, is based in large part on a complex set of interactions among family members. Until recently most policy analyses implicitly viewed the household as having only one set of preferences. This assumption has been a powerful tool for understanding household behavior, such as the distribution of tasks and goods. But a growing body of evidence suggests that this view is an expedience that comes at considerable, and possibly avoidable, cost. The article argues that more effective policy instruments will emerge from analyzing the processes by which households balance the diverse interests of their members.
Details
-
Author
Alderman, Harold Chiappori, Pierre-Andre Haddad,
-
Document Date
1995/02/28
-
Document Type
Journal Article
-
Report Number
14300
-
Volume No
1
-
Total Volume(s)
1
-
Country
-
Region
-
Disclosure Date
2010/07/01
-
Disclosure Status
Disclosed
-
Doc Name
Unitary versus collective models of the household : is it time to shift the burden of proof?
-
Keywords
Household data; Models; Consumption per capita; Standard of living; Poverty mitigation; Policy analysis
- See More
Downloads
COMPLETE REPORT
Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)
- Official PDF
- TXT*
- Total Downloads** :
- Download Stats
-
*The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.
Citation
Alderman, Harold Chiappori, Pierre-Andre Haddad,
Unitary versus collective models of the household : is it time to shift the burden of proof? (English). Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/233181468739240149/Unitary-versus-collective-models-of-the-household-is-it-time-to-shift-the-burden-of-proof