Skip to Main Navigation

Globalization, growth, and distribution : framing the questions (English)

In the last two decades, across a range of countries high growth rates have reduced poverty but have been accompanied by rising inequality. This paper is motivated by this stylized fact, and by the strong distributional concerns that persist among populations and policy makers alike, despite the poverty reduction observed in official statistics where growth has been sufficiently high. This seeming disconnects frames the questions posed in this paper. Why the disconnect, and what to do about it? It is argued that official poverty statistics may be missing key elements of the ground level reality of distributional evolution, of which rising inequality may be an indirect indicator. Heterogeneity of population means that there may be significant numbers of poor losers from technical change, economic reform and global integration, even when overall measured poverty falls. In terms of actions, attention is drawn to the role of safety nets as generalized compensation mechanisms, to address the ethical and political economy dimensions of such a pattern of distributional evolution. Addressing structural inequalities is also a long term answer with payoffs in terms of equitable growth. In terms of future analysis, diminishing returns have set in to the inequality-growth cross-country regressions literature. Further work to help policy makers should focus on: (i) new information to illuminate the disconnect; (ii) analysis and assessment of safety nets as generalized compensation mechanisms; and (iii) addressing specific forms of structural inequality related to assets, gender, and social groupings like caste or ethnicity.


  • Author

    Kanbur, Ravi

  • Document Date


  • Document Type

    Working Paper (Numbered Series)

  • Report Number


  • Volume No


  • Total Volume(s)


  • Country


  • Region

    The World Region,

  • Disclosure Date


  • Disclosure Status


  • Doc Name

    Globalization, growth, and distribution : framing the questions

  • Keywords

    increase in inequality;impact on poverty reduction;equality of opportunity;representative household survey data;incidence of income poverty;civil society at large;rate of poverty reduction;increase in income inequality;high growth rate;social welfare function;rising inequality;growth and development;inequality of income;measure of poverty;inequality will;degree of inequality;reduction in poverty;Poverty & Inequality;measure of inequality;world development;incidence of poverty;official poverty;increasing inequality;pattern of change;redistribution of income;burden of proof;change in poverty;negative distributional consequence;political economy dimension;millennium development goal;depth of poverty;forms of income;implications for policy;evolution of inequality;inequality of opportunity;dynamics of growth;state of knowledge;country case study;total population size;local public good;perception of poverty;equality of treatment;risk and vulnerability;per capita gnp;household and individual;income distribution datum;civil society observers;high population growth;population at large;decomposable poverty measure;Public Services;intrahousehold inequality;official statistic;global integration;economic liberalization;measured poverty;Gender Inequality;gender inequalities;discount rate;cross-country data;Poverty measures;inequality measure;tradable sector;household income;inequality decline;decreasing inequality;Poverty Measurement;household composition;expenditure survey;steady state;increase poverty;Transition economies;national poverty;rural area;poverty index;conventional policy;economic reform;ground level;poverty datum;poverty decline;thematic papers;individual level;Equal Opportunity;transition economy;compensation mechanism;spatial inequality;Public Goods;accounting framework;beneficial impact;consumption datum;economics literature;global poverty;statistical agency;income share;individual consumption;poverty outcome;differential mortality;income gain;conceptual issue;cash crop;Street Children;foreign affair;child bearing;soup kitchen;child rearing;policy shift;econometric analysis;declining inequality;real income;econometric work;empirical literature;price differential;relative inequality;financial integration;research study;adult equivalent;monetary equivalent;average consumption;inequality index;black population;redistributive measures;household level;household size;free food;life chances;racial group;blunt instrument;average household;educational achievement;consumption need;national-level poverty;observed increase;relative weighting;child's home;measured inequality;minimum level;equal distribution;individual preference;international agency;anthropometric measure;root crop;declining poverty;market activity;risk taking;government preference;equitable policy;empirical study;moderate poverty;social grouping;cross-country regression;diminishing return;multilateral institution;home consumption;population mean;headcount ratio;qualitative assessment;housing service;social unrest;shadow value;Labor Market;lorenz curve;primary source;international capital;empirical knowledge;Industrialized countries;short period;industrialized country;Fiscal policies;global economy;subsidiary right;development cooperation;fiscal policy;



Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)

  • Official PDF
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.


Kanbur, Ravi

Globalization, growth, and distribution : framing the questions (English). Commission on growth and development working paper ; no. 5 Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group.