Skip to Main Navigation

Rural development - from vision to action - Phase II (English)

The report covers the Second Phase evaluation of the Bank's rural development strategy, - From Vision to Action - examines partners perceptions on the strategy in five countries, - Latvia, Morocco, Mozambique, Peru, and the Philippines - and their progress consistent with the strategic targets. It also reports on the progress achieved Bank-wide in implementing Phase I recommendations. Suggestions imply that, although the principles of the strategy are broadly sound, this strategy failed to provide an enabling framework for effective action, for while the Bank's effectiveness at rural development is perceived to have increased, it is still not satisfactory. Furthermore, the Bank's rural work is not sufficiently focused on poverty reduction, implying that the rural strategy needs to be further articulated in Country Assistance Strategies, which would strengthen rural advocacy, both within the Bank, and beyond. Likewise, the practice of rural-urban linkages should be strengthened, to address the cross-sector nature of rural development. The study argues on the relevance of this strategy to the Bank's partners, and whether it is perceived as effective, recommending further outreach by the Rural Sector Board to country management units, and partners outside the Bank; closer links of the strategic principles to poverty reduction; and, redesign of the budget coding system, to reflect the Bank's work in rural areas.

Details

  • Document Date

    2000/06/22

  • Document Type

    IEG Evaluation

  • Report Number

    20628

  • Volume No

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • Country

    Peru,

    Philippines,

    Mozambique,

    Latvia,

    Morocco,

  • Region

    Middle East and North Africa,

  • Disclosure Date

    2008/04/09

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Doc Name

    Rural development - from vision to action? - Phase II

  • Keywords

    economic and sector work;rural water supply and sanitation;rural development strategy;share of public spending;local government capacity building;Policy and Institutional Framework;Management of Natural Resources;Public and Private Institution;Rural Water and Sanitation;Urban and Rural Development;Natural Resource Management;rural strategy;rural area;support Rural Development;addressing poverty reduction;Promoting Private Sector;central government expenditure;central government fiscal;size of farm;safety net program;consultations with stakeholders;population at large;public investment program;analysis of variance;areas of trade;quality at entry;focus group meeting;current account balance;managing natural resources;degree of influence;country case study;rural development plan;public sector ownership;social development fund;public expenditure program;private sector representative;delivery of service;small rural municipality;improved agricultural technologies;capacity of farmer;water supply system;partner bank;local accountability mechanisms;rural infrastructure service;agricultural extension service;local water supply;civil society;shared growth;rural family;agriculture sector;portfolio quality;country rating;donor coordination;government intervention;resident missions;rural work;rural population;budget code;staff capacity;donor representative;Agrarian Reform;Rural Sector;irrigated area;poverty action;Land tenure;economic integration;policy orientation;rural content;budget datum;coherent policy;local ownership;project approval;evaluation framework;fiscal balance;Water Allocation;credit subsidy;social indicator;Quality Enhancement;macroeconomic performance;government representative;economic recovery;poor farming;credit access;water right;fiscal decentralization;financial crisis;institutional resource;land holding;foreign assistance;social trends;Agricultural Trade;open economy;food self-sufficiency;agricultural market;direct intervention;smallholder farmer;indigenous communities;crisis services;indigenous community;paternalistic attitude;economic security;local condition;price stability;Civil War;national forest;Exchange Rates;fiscal deficit;legal framework;water law;explicit poverty;macroeconomic targets;active portfolio;summary statistic;regional equity;portfolio performance;effective outreach;effective action;natural environment;water resource;potential conflicts;teacher supervision;respondents felt;sanitation committee;staff survey;aggregate result;participatory approach;Political Systems;rural woman;civil conflict;urban poor;Rural Poor;veterinary Services;investment capital;poor community;agriculture trade;industry lobby;productive activity;vulnerable group;agricultural support;technical standard;local infrastructure;subsequent years;volatile capital;community level;market economy;rural community;negative correlation;produce food;agricultural intensification;effective strategy;agricultural economy;fiscal implication;water sector;free market;section show;evaluation study;administrative support;primary audience;poverty alleviation;activity code;institutional environment;agricultural value;cashew nut;rural portfolio;sector reports;budget scenario;environmental infrastructure;farm sector;proportional increase;poverty indicator;stream order;quantitative data;macro indicators;Macroeconomic Stability;standard indicator;investment account;

Downloads

COMPLETE REPORT

Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)

  • Official PDF
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.

Citation

Rural development - from vision to action - Phase II (English). Sector or Thematic Evaluation Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/395421468052452228/Rural-development-from-vision-to-action-Phase-II