Skip to Main Navigation

Burundi - Food Crisis Response Development Policy Grant Project (English)

Ratings for the Food Crisis Response Development Policy Grant Project for Burundi were as follows: outcome was unsatisfactory; risk to development outcome was significant; Bank performance was moderately unsatisfactory; and borrower performance was moderately satisfactory. Some lessons learned includes: the choice of instruments and policy measures for an emergency food crisis intervention needs to take into account the local causes of poverty and hunger. In the case of the Burundi food crisis operation, recent sector work emphasized the centrality of long-run constraints to agricultural productivity to these problems, while the analysis in the program document gave the impression that the main problem for Burundi was short-term in nature caused by the 2007-08 spikes in world commodity prices. For budget support as for other operations, it is difficult to assess results in the absence of a clear framework setting out links between policy actions, outputs, and outcomes and of baseline measures of the outcomes against which progress can be measured. The food crisis grant operation for Burundi did not clearly specify the links between the various actions that were supported and the outcomes underpinning project objectives. Scaling up of safety nets is a common strategy in an emergency situation, but expanding a program to new areas may take time. In the case of Burundi, not all schools had the necessary infrastructure to support the feeding program, and local management had to be put in place in the new areas.


  • Document Date


  • Document Type

    Project Performance Assessment Report

  • Report Number


  • Volume No


  • Total Volume(s)


  • Country


  • Region


  • Disclosure Date


  • Disclosure Status


  • Doc Name

    Burundi - Food Crisis Response Development Policy Grant Project

  • Keywords

    Spring Meeting;Sustainable Land and Water Management;International Fund for Agricultural Development;food crisis;school feeding program;social and economic development;achievement of development outcome;Demographic and Health Survey;food price;Operational Core Curriculum;global food crisis response;water supply and sanitation;millennium development goal;maternal and child health;finance and risk management;incidence of public spending;fiscal stability;social unrest;balance of payment;consumer price index;domestic food prices;school year;tariff on import;tariff import;quality at entry;list of countries;fuel price increase;caloric intake;Balance of Trade;international food prices;targeted safety nets;lack of food;investments in infrastructure;high population density;donor agency staff;total government spending;extent of poverty;basic food item;quality of preparation;quality of supervision;school management committee;mortality of child;children under age;pattern of development;household food security;Development Policy Operation;value added tax;sustainable land management;long term funding;budget support operations;package of policy;risk management instrument;decline in productivity;investments in agriculture;calories per day;Social Safety Nets;primary school child;cash transfer program;economic growth rate;Food Price Index;adequate food supply;availability of food;food staple;Tax Exemption;reducing hunger;agricultural productivity;commodity price;food aid;local food;cassava flour;displaced person;rural area;agriculture policy;urban agricultural policy;food production;tax policy;sweet potato;domestic output;crisis intervention;panel review;food crop;government transfer;trade balance;net importer;food import;expenditure survey;maize flour;staple food;tea markets;household welfare;short term impact;Civil War;short-term impact;price spike;fiscal stabilization;nutrition survey;monetary expenditure;maize price;rapid assessment;sustainable policy;improved communication;local factors;market participation;consumption expenditure;supply response;peace agreement;armed groups;conflict countries;annual imports;welfare impact;Rural Poor;significant correlation;tea sector;net exporter;government budget;imported oil;external factor;massive increase;fuel import;domestic price;calorie deficiency;welfare quintile;national household;composite measure;fuel tax;school inspector;internal review;program expansion;local source;Support for Agriculture;price trend;gasoline imports;Fiscal policies;fiscal policy;fiscal deficit;domestic tax;foreign trade;improved technologies;agricultural commodity;extension program;Irrigation Rehabilitation;pupil number;humanitarian intervention;output market;macroeconomic reform;world food;goods vehicle;dollar value;information campaign;countervailing measure;food intake;cluster survey;chronic hunger;budget allocation;Donor Commitment;diesel prices;donor representative;logistical support;emergency response;increased access;outcome indicator;decline in agriculture;nutritional intake;fresh meat;Government Performance;administrative support;results framework;government operation;admission rate;budget law;field work;Borrowing Countries;watershed management;irrigation development;coffee sector;agriculture sector;cotton sector;emergency management;stated objective;livestock sector;adjustment operation;transition arrangement;credit closing;social assistance;custom duty;support policy;fundamental problem;Market Intelligence;livestock subsector;adequate supply;government commitment;emergency food;sector work;quality seed;common strategies;emergency situation;local management;volatile commodity;market basket;external assistance;world market;long-term strategy;budgetary cost;produce food;evaluation method;sectoral approach;project ratings;crop yield;secure tenure;farm household;marketable surplus;cereal yield;food demand;subsistence crop;market access;import tariff;irrigation system;agricultural fertilizer;social security



Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)

  • Official PDF
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.


Burundi - Food Crisis Response Development Policy Grant Project (English). Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group.