Skip to Main Navigation

Can Local Participatory Programs Enhance Public Confidence : Insights from the Local Initiatives Support Program in Russia (English)

This paper reviews the performance of the Russia Local Initiatives Support Program (LISP) as an instrument for directly addressing the needs of the population to access socioeconomic infrastructure, for increasing public confidence in self-governance frameworks and institutions through dialogue and community budgeting consultations, and for strengthening the capacity for local self-governance. The paper does this by looking at historical and survey data from the implementation of the LISP methodology as part of regional programs in Russia.

Details

  • Author

    Shulga,Ivan, Shilov,Lev, Sukhova,Anna, Pojarski,Peter Ivanov

  • Document Date

    2019/05/01

  • Document Type

    Working Paper (Numbered Series)

  • Report Number

    137448

  • Volume No

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • Country

    Russian Federation,

  • Region

    Europe and Central Asia,

  • Disclosure Date

    2019/06/05

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Doc Name

    Can Local Participatory Programs Enhance Public Confidence : Insights from the Local Initiatives Support Program in Russia

  • Keywords

    microproject selection criterion; local self-governance; low levels of access; Housing and Communal Services; treatment group; public confidence; water supply facilities; social effect; number of beneficiaries; socioeconomic infrastructure; participatory budget; availability of infrastructure; selection of respondent; participatory budget practice; participatory decision making; Type of Investment; quality of public; linear probability model; level of governance; flow of fund; source of income; source income; safety net mechanism; transparency of decisions; sense of ownership; improvements in access; number of assets; role in society; public opinion poll; access to infrastructure; level of support; local infrastructure; community meetings; rural settlement; quantitative survey; local population; regional budget; rural area; survey methodology; local problem; community center; survey data; citizen involvement; institutional infrastructure; direct participation; local stakeholder; municipal budget; focus group; survey results; project approval; social need; public satisfaction; disadvantaged area; road repair; small-scale infrastructure; participatory practice; project identification; average score; traditional sector; urban districts; Public Infrastructure; social infrastructure; federal law; public good; Public Goods; Social Protection; welfare program; public meeting; historical data; disadvantaged population; common goals; school student; business community; social issue; international level; efficiency improvement; institutional framework; participatory democracy; urban settlement; local demand; local capacity; local priority; rural community; community contribution; budgetary practice; official statistic; vulnerable group; government representative; public authority; social capital; administrative level; budget planning; information exchange; poor community; rural inhabitant; citizen reporting; participatory mechanism; territorial units; public oversight; improved public; social priority; sample result; european commission; political values; sports facilities; survey sampling; public environment; recreation facilities; participatory design; population level; population number; participation rate; binding constraint; floor boards; high probability; Equal Opportunity; basic infrastructure; evaluation study; beneficiary interviews; individual level; qualitative data; building material; local resident; local development; program results; community ownership; survey respondent; community consultation; financial contribution; beneficiary population; regional regulation; municipal official; transport program; broad participation; municipal staff; awareness campaign; construction waste; territorial development; adult population; community participation; improved communication; assessment criterion; awareness raising; cultural institution; physical distance; permanent resident; institution building; legal system; citizen engagement; Wastewater Disposal; government capacity; small municipality; budgetary system; centralized state; administrative structure; community budget; budget fund; equal right; Public Services; local legislation; financing mechanism; social value; public budget; local public; noncommercial purposes; subsidiary right; residency status

Downloads

COMPLETE REPORT

Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)

  • Official PDF
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.

Citation

Shulga,Ivan Shilov,Lev Sukhova,Anna Pojarski,Peter Ivanov

Can Local Participatory Programs Enhance Public Confidence : Insights from the Local Initiatives Support Program in Russia (English). Social protection and jobs discussion paper,no. 1931 Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/431001559771571513/Can-Local-Participatory-Programs-Enhance-Public-Confidence-Insights-from-the-Local-Initiatives-Support-Program-in-Russia