Skip to Main Navigation

Cost recovery, equity, and efficiency in water tariffs : evidence from African utilities (English)

Water and sanitation utilities in Africa operate in a high-cost environment. They also have a mandate to at least partially recover their costs of operations and maintenance (O&M). As a result, water tariffs are higher than in other regions of the world. The increasing block tariff (IBT) is the most common tariff structure in Africa. Most African utilities are able to achieve O&M cost recovery at the highest block tariffs, but not at the first-block tariffs, which are designed to provide affordable water to low-volume consumers, who are often poor. At the same time, few utilities can recover even a small part of their capital costs, even in the highest tariff blocks. Unfortunately, the equity objectives of the IBT structure are not met in many countries. The subsidy to the lowest tariff-block does not benefit the poor exclusively, and the minimum consumption charge is often burdensome for the poorest customers. Many poor households cannot even afford a connection to the piped water network. This can be a significant barrier to expansion for utilities. Therefore, many countries have begun to subsidize household connections. For many households, standposts managed by utilities, donors, or private operators have emerged as an alternative to piped water. Those managed by utilities or that supply utility water are expected to use the formal utility tariffs, which are kept low to make water affordable for low-income households. The price for water that is resold through informal channels, however, is much more expensive than piped water.


  • Author

    Banerjee,Sudeshna Ghosh, Foster,Vivien, Skilling,Heather, Wodon,Quentin T., Ying, Yvonne

  • Document Date


  • Document Type

    Policy Research Working Paper

  • Report Number


  • Volume No


  • Total Volume(s)


  • Country


  • Region


  • Disclosure Date


  • Disclosure Status


  • Doc Name

    Cost recovery, equity, and efficiency in water tariffs : evidence from African utilities

  • Keywords

    urban water;poverty and social impact analysis;consumption;marginal cost of water;marginal cost of supply;large quantity of water;millennium development goal;connection fee for sewerage;cubic meters per month;tariff structure;level of consumption;water utility;water utilities;minimum consumption charge;consumption level;block tariff structure;Learning and Innovation Credit;water and wastewater;gross national income;water tariff structure;monthly fixed fee;volume of water;operations and maintenance;water use;average consumption;global knowledge base;lack of competition;per capita cost;subsidies for water;water demand management;provision of water;provision water;water connection charge;water usage charge;wastewater tariff structure;average water tariff;water and electricity;per capita consumption;payment for water;amount of investment;recovery of investment;water service delivery;investment cost;connection cost;water bill;block structure;effective price;large consumer;piped water;residential tariff;utility charge;average price;efficient price;pipe size;commercial tariff;water consumption;wastewater service;rehabilitation costs;higher consumption;subsistence consumption;operational expense;wastewater charge;block price;price signal;household size;enforcement mechanism;volumetric charge;tariff design;household consumption;cost-recovery policy;residential consumer;water meter;tariff level;poor household;consumer behavior;water scarcity;water market;public standposts;efficient utility;input cost;free water;quality water;public health;implicit assumption;average consumer;consumption blocks;supply shortages;investment need;cost information;discount rate;asset use;annual production;explicit subsidy;cost structure;high tariff;household connection;collected information;official estimates;aggregate benefit;financial cost;marginal benefit;cross subsidy;financial sustainability;conventional wisdom;flat charge;residential water;residential connections;water conservation;consumption need;demographic trend;population number;rising trend;supply side;reducing prices;infrastructure service;safe water;unit price;exorbitant tariff;high-volume consumers;private investment;urban service;stated objective;administrative cost;meter reading;economic efficiency;flat fee;minimum charge;low volume;private operator;state utility;large utility;decentralized system;infrastructure sector;tariff change;governance performance;low-income household;informal channel;equity objective;formal utility;low-volume consumer;affordable water;raise revenues;low tariff;public fountain;commercial system;price structure;nonresidential consumer;price decline;tariff block;sanitation utility;sewerage service;sewerage facilities;On-Site Sanitation;performance data;water user;production cost;water price;Water Services;utility performance;wastewater system;market condition;average cost;cost data;environmental benefit;unintended consequence;tariff policy;urban wastewater;



Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)

  • Official PDF
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.


Banerjee,Sudeshna Ghosh Foster,Vivien Skilling,Heather Wodon,Quentin T. Ying, Yvonne

Cost recovery, equity, and efficiency in water tariffs : evidence from African utilities (English). Policy Research working paper ; no. WPS 5384 Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group.