Skip to Main Navigation

Philippines - National Community Driven Development Project (English)

The objective of the National Community Driven Development Project for Philippines is to empower communities in targeted municipalities to achieve improved access to services and to participate in more inclusive local planning, budgeting and implementation. The project has 3 components. (1) Barangay (Community) sub-grants for planning and Investment component will support two types of assistance to participating barangays. First, planning grants will be made available to communities to support the Community Empowerment Activity Cycle (CEAC). Second, investment grants will support community sub-project investments and activities (community based public infrastructure and services such as roads, bridges, schools, day care centers, etc.) that respond to community-identified priorities. (2) Local capacity building and implementation support component supports the strengthening of municipal local government units and staff to facilitate and oversee the planning and implementation of community infrastructure sub-projects. The component will also help to ensure quality of infrastructure investments and the integrity of resource management, and to monitor and report on sub-project progress and results. (3) Project administration, monitoring and evaluation component will finance the overall management of the project including goods, consultant services, training, workshops, and operating costs.


  • Document Date


  • Document Type

    Project Appraisal Document

  • Report Number


  • Volume No


  • Total Volume(s)


  • Country


  • Region

    East Asia and Pacific,

  • Disclosure Date


  • Disclosure Status


  • Disclosure Type


  • Doc Name

    Philippines - National Community Driven Development Project

  • Keywords

    local poverty;Economic Internal Rate of Return;autonomous region;community empowerment;roads and highway;Participation and Civic Engagement;Risks and Mitigation Measures;economic and financial analysis;capacity building of community;access to basic service;monitoring and evaluation data;community management of resource;conditional cash transfer program;day care center;reduction in poverty;sphere of influence;social protection program;rural health units;effective safety nets;quality of infrastructure;maternal and child;access to information;attendance at school;local capacity building;Safeguard Policies;safeguard policy;readiness for implementation;maintenance of infrastructure;basic social service;quality of data;cases of corruption;conflict resolution mechanism;per capita allocation;block grant allocation;project management structure;barrier to woman;disaster prone area;national government agency;human development outcome;scale and scope;Public Financial Management;capacity building support;measure of poverty;productive employment opportunity;incidence of poverty;improvements in access;public service delivery;combination of factor;service delivery responsibility;participation of citizens;investment in school;per capita consumption;per capita expenditure;Disaster Risk Mitigation;poverty reduction effort;public sector provider;international good practice;marginalized group;good governance;poverty incidence;positive impact;result indicator;local planning;participatory planning;Public Infrastructure;civil society;institutional context;management responsibility;inclusive growth;action planning;poverty targeting;village assembly;response effort;municipal income;public resource;female participation;gender mainstreaming;community base;indigenous people;community group;community level;social capital;community volunteer;Indigenous Peoples;health station;community facilitator;community drive;financial operation;strategic management;recovery activity;local development;municipal government;governance practice;effective approach;household welfare;household survey;labor activity;citizen participation;legal mandate;fiscal framework;elected officials;outcome indicator;partnership arrangement;community investment;indigenous population;diagnostic tool;budget requirement;international community;indigenous community;government units;project quality;eligibility criterion;Capital Investments;patronage politics;vulnerable communities;gender assessment;population number;participatory development;community reconstruction;project identification;financial analyst;operational recommendations;investment process;household consumption;poor household;legal system;municipal offices;indigenous communities;operational capacity;contract arrangement;community procurement;Exchange Rates;philippine peso;community planning;vulnerable group;results framework;universal coverage;Basic Education;positive outcome;working relationship;water system;government planning;project intervention;counterpart fund;active engagement;project impact;investment yield;community participation;Institutional data;eligible community;investment grant;train activity;national revenue;strategic objective;gini coefficient;funds flow;learning approach;Violent Conflict;community control;development partner;external financing;vulnerable area;horizontal inequity;front-end fee;counterpart contribution;baseline cost;price contingency;operational procedure;project's impact;unfunded mandate;administrative region;physical inspection;secondary classroom;community health;emergency relief;access infrastructure;school building;institution building;spatial inequality;reconstruction assistance;education outcome;service access;geographic isolation;oversight arrangement;annual budget;incidental costs;legal instrument;budget transparency;performance criteria;reporting system;care service;governance outcome;governance risk;budget execution;



Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)

  • Official PDF
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.


Philippines - National Community Driven Development Project (English). Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group.