Skip to Main Navigation

Distinguishing between types of data and methods of collecting them (English)

The author examines the role of different data collection methods--including the types of data they produce--in the analysis of social phenomena in developing countries. He points out that one confusing factor in the "quantitative-qualitative" debate is that a distinction is not clearly made between methods of data collection used and types of data generated. He maintains the divide between quantitative and qualitative types of data but analyzes methods according to their "contextuality": the degree to which they try to understand human behavior in the social, cultural, economic, and political environment of a given place. He emphasizes that it is most fruitful to think of both methods and data as lying on a continuum stretching from more to less contextual methodology and from more to less qualitative data output. Using characteristic information needs for health planning derived from data on the use of health services, he shows that each combination of method (more or less contextual) and data (more or less qualitative) is a unique primary source that can fulfill different information requirements. He concludes that: 1) Certain information about health utilization can be obtained only through contextual methods--in which case strict statistical representability must give way to inductive conclusions, assessments of internal validity, and replicability of results. 2) Often contextual methods are needed to design appropriate noncontextual data collection tools. 3) Even where noncontextual data collection methods are needed, contextual methods can play an important role in assessing the validity of the results at the local level. 4) In cases where different data collection methods can be used to probe general results, the methods can--and need to be--formally linked.

Details

  • Author

    Hentschel, Jesko

  • Document Date

    1998/04/30

  • Document Type

    Policy Research Working Paper

  • Report Number

    WPS1914

  • Volume No

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • Disclosure Date

    2010/07/01

  • Doc Name

    Distinguishing between types of data and methods of collecting them

  • Keywords

    primary health;qualitative data;health policy and planning;cost of health services;data collection method;local population;primary health care facilities;accessibility of health care;quality of public service;male head of household;cross-price elasticity of demand;provision of health service;health service utilization;health facility;data type;data collection process;household survey;health sector planning;health service use;health demand study;basic health care;health care service;data collection instruments;quality of health;health care consumption;health care utilization;public health center;health care facility;health care allocation;beneficiary assessment;government health service;distribution of resource;poor rural population;conditions of payment;equipment and supply;health facility use;quality and quantity;hard budget constraint;demand for girl;cost recovery program;data collection forms;private sector service;health care demand;health policy makers;health care cost;public health service;health policy formulation;health care planning;government health facility;public revenue generation;Population and Health;health care centers;human capital investment;severity of disease;health insurance scheme;choice of provider;primary health facility;health beliefs;health utilization;quantitative data;human behavior;focus group;utilization rate;health expenditure;traditional healer;primary source;provider choice;qualitative method;epidemiological profile;social phenomenon;data generation;participatory assessment;health survey;political environment;rapid assessment;medical equipment;social stratification;social capital;catchment area;rural health;informant interviews;gender discrimination;rural area;young child;health status;village survey;drug supply;health knowledge;quantitative method;old children;qualitative research;average price;payment system;transaction cost;health behavior;social realities;vulnerable group;methodological approach;public primary;participant observation;Social Sciences;comparative advantage;quality service;support network;anthropological research;health users;transport problem;local evaluation;learning process;Public Transport;exemption policy;price response;individual household;hispanic women;health resource;representative household;cultural factor;social information;evaluation design;information requirement;subjective perceptions;quality indicators;scientific approach;research design;investigative methods;qualitative approach;community influences;empirical investigation;empirical analysis;user behavior;qualitative study;research result;formal interviews;potential contribution;childhood disease;private clinic;software package;common knowledge;dead body;survey design;participatory method;social security;political analysis;cultural environment;personal health;causal link;older woman;rural woman;treatment seeking;traditional recipes;transmission process;food production;important policy;Health policies;gender difference;health investment;caste system;individual assessment;raw data;rural community;diagnostic skill;error variance;Birth Spacing;female health;central regions;literature review;local culture;social scientist;disease profile;water availability;health program;traditional practitioners;demographic variables;ethnic divide;Health Workers;medical visit;primary factors;Birth Control;private hospitals;kinship network;rising cost;data recording;public expenditure;fee exemption;representative sample;statistical analyses;subjective assessment;objective assessment;anthropological study;low-income household;epidemiological survey;Public Services;tertiary care;Infectious Disease;modern health;personal income;accurate information;public policy;public provision;household income;primary care;urban population;alternative provider;survey methods;benefit incidence;social anthropologists;political participation;quantitative survey;Labor Market;quantitative research;meaning system;section show;social factor

Downloads

COMPLETE REPORT

Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)

  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.

Citation

Hentschel, Jesko

Distinguishing between types of data and methods of collecting them (English). Policy, Research working paper ; no. WPS 1914 Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/575761468766463068/Distinguishing-between-types-of-data-and-methods-of-collecting-them