Skip to Main Navigation

Planning public financial management reforms in pacific island countries : guidance note (English)

This note provides guidance on planning, prioritizing, and accessing appropriate capacity for Public Financial Management (PFM) reform in Pacific Island Countries (PICs). It is intended for use by government officials, donor agencies, and consultants. It complements, and is consistent with, extensive previous work carried out by the Pacific Financial Technical Assistance Center (PFTAC) and joint efforts by the Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) Secretariat, International Monetary Fund (IMF), and European Commission. Recommendations are based on a review of the literature and experiences of PFM reform in the region to date, with a focus on issues that are of particular relevance in PICs. Author start point that creative approaches are sometimes needed to PFM reform in Pacific Countries because of the extent and duration of capacity constraints. Authors have two key messages. Firstly, PFM capacity should be prioritized to areas that matter most in achieving development outcomes, and reforms should be intended to address specific, identified, problems, rather than to achieve blueprint 'good practice' standards. Secondly, with small numbers of staff and high staff turnover limiting potential for sustainable gains from standard capacity building solutions, broader options for meeting capacity gaps should be considered, including accessing ongoing support for specialized tasks or even the wholesale 'outsourcing' of certain functions.

Details

  • Author

    Haque,Tobias Akhtar

  • Document Date

    2013/01/01

  • Document Type

    Other Financial Sector Study

  • Report Number

    78582

  • Volume No

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • Country

    Pacific Islands,

  • Region

    East Asia and Pacific,

  • Disclosure Date

    2013/06/19

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Doc Name

    Planning public financial management reforms in pacific island countries : guidance note

  • Keywords

    broad range of stakeholders;quality of public spending;capacity constraint;allocation of resource;resources and capacity;economies of scale;ministries of finance;political economy factor;cash flow problem;access to skill;members of parliament;transfer of skill;accountability for results;absence of staff;constraints to development;high opportunity cost;overseas development institute;local private sector;local labor market;debt sustainability analysis;difference in income;cross country evidence;accounting and reporting;implementation of reform;accumulation of debt;assessment of revenue;sovereign wealth fund;source of revenue;private sector provider;reform priorities;small country;aggregate expenditure;reform plan;political level;political support;reform process;reform effort;resource constraint;small population;local capacity;Macroeconomic Management;sustainable level;fiscal risk;budget process;budget allocation;average score;donor agencies;budget support;limited resources;external stakeholder;fiscal forecast;government priority;discretionary programs;communication strategy;government ownership;adequate resources;expenditure pressures;cash rationing;debt dynamic;political process;skilled staff;state functions;expenditure decision;public servant;approved budget;reform implementation;regional experience;budget levels;Macroeconomic Stability;long-term strategy;extensive consultation;government leadership;reform measure;resource requirements;broad ownership;conservative approach;macroeconomic sustainability;unnecessary duplication;fiscal stability;fiscal control;political interest;tax inspection;resource availability;budget priority;budget expenditure;population size;contingent liability;reform requirements;capacity requirements;political cycle;contingent liabilities;expenditure framework;external factor;capacity shortage;previous work;european commission;adequate capacity;financial statement;budget formation;public expenditure;expenditure revenue;fiscal implication;future obligation;forecasting method;economic volatility;development partner;economic shock;stated objective;budget performance;sector ceiling;priority program;export base;public entity;island countries;reform design;sustainable capacity;monitoring progress;rent seeking;financing constraint;contract management;accountability arrangement;increased accountability;comparator group;improve revenue;cash reserve;built flexibility;political circumstances;government actor;scarce resource;ongoing support;staff turnover;existing capacity;policy priority;political context;institutional change;administrative problem;cash need;fiduciary risk;financial resource;assessing progress;long-term changes;external assistance;personnel information;political opposition;public finance;staff rotation;basic charge;government resource;expenditure ceiling;legal framework;standardized assessment;debt service;political imperative;expenditure budget;input mix;budget system;insufficient information;common use;professional body;internal control;government objective;fiscal decentralization;expenditure limit;government staff;natural disaster;civil society;cash management;financial compliance;Tax Administration;accurate forecast;reform package;budget execution;expenditure policy;

Downloads

COMPLETE REPORT

Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)

  • Official PDF
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.

Citation

Haque,Tobias Akhtar

Planning public financial management reforms in pacific island countries : guidance note (English). Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/603671468292212459/Planning-public-financial-management-reforms-in-pacific-island-countries-guidance-note