Skip to Main Navigation

Growth before and after trade liberalization (English)

The empirical study of the impact of trade liberalization has not convinced the skeptics about the economic gains after trade reforms. Some have even argued that trade reforms have led to economic collapse and to deindustrialization. Using a sample that excludes countries that were subject to major exogenous disruptions, the authors note that post-reform economic growth was 1.2 percentage points higher than before the reforms. This is remarkable considering that pre-reform periods were characterized by highly expansionary state policies and large external borrowing, and the crisis years that preceded trade liberalization in the comparisons are eliminated. Through multivariate fixed effects estimations the authors calculate that annual per capita GDP growth rates increased by up to 2.6 percentage points after the trade reforms, compared to a counterfactual that takes into consideration the evolution of several growth determinants. Moreover, trade liberalization has been followed by an acceleration of growth in investment, exports of goods and services, and manufacturing exports, and as opposed to common belief, outward orientation did not lead to significant deindustrialization and actually seems to have increased export diversification. Growth acceleration occurred irrespective of income per capita level and was quite significant in Sub-Saharan Africa. As expected, small countries benefited most from the reforms.

Details

  • Author

    Aksoy,M. Ataman, Salinas,Gonzalo

  • Document Date

    2006/11/01

  • Document Type

    Policy Research Working Paper

  • Report Number

    WPS4062

  • Volume No

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • Country

    World,

  • Region

    The World Region,

  • Disclosure Date

    2010/07/01

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Doc Name

    Growth before and after trade liberalization

  • Keywords

    impact of trade liberalization;fixed effect;real exchange rate misalignment;determinants of economic growth;impact of trade reforms;competitive real exchange rate;volatility in commodity prices;foreign direct investment policy;terms of trade;current account deficit;structural adjustment reform;current account balance;effect of trade;measure of trade;reducing trade barriers;share of export;trade policy stance;demand for import;gross capital formation;cross-country growth regression;determinants of growth;share of output;development of market;annual economic growth;department of economics;increase in income;benefits of trade;open trade policies;exogenous technological change;gdp growth rate;export of goods;number of researchers;exchange rate reform;empirical growth literature;structural adjustment program;school enrollment rate;factor in production;open trade regime;physical capital investment;statistical significance;output growth;independent variable;human capital;Trade Restrictiveness;outward orientation;population size;manufacturing export;fiscal balance;Exchange Rates;stable growth;empirical study;natural disaster;export concentration;basic specification;liberalization episode;higher growth;social indicator;trade flow;socialist system;export marketing;economic crisis;income convergence;merchandise export;empirical findings;nontariff barrier;sample selection;fiscal adjustment;literature review;empirical literature;life expectancy;inflation growth;small country;Macroeconomic Policy;steady state;industrial value;recessionary period;external shock;oil dependence;Population Growth;empirical exercise;saving rate;constant return;export growth;cross-country comparison;econometric technique;export company;value added;geographic region;trade opening;supply response;equilibrium value;state involvement;economic evolution;privatization program;macroeconomic variable;economic reform;conflict countries;oil price;foreign exchange;export share;economic isolation;capital inflow;negative coefficient;equilibrium level;Capital Inflows;world demand;foreign capital;slight reduction;average values;investment industry;internal market;fuel export;fiscal deficit;restrictive trade;liberalization process;downward bias;statistical technique;empirical research;alternative route;capital accumulation;conditional convergence;random error;depreciation rate;cross-country regression;convergence hypothesis;conventional wisdom;empirical analysis;income gap;liberalization program;tariff structure;weighted average;panel regression;positive impact;widespread consensus;government consumption;aggregate income;standard approach;market economy;external environment;import barrier;technological spillover;increased trade;economic stagnation;intermediate input;economic recovery;small economy;excessive levels;output level;technological development;external equilibrium;political conflict;white noise;policy orientation;liberalized trade;statistical evidence;external borrowing;state policy;trade theory;endogenous growth;increase growth;classical assumption;positive production;market failure;economic vulnerability;cross-country evidence;sectoral reform;complementary policies;study including;lagged dependent;inflation reduction;dynamic specification;gradual reformer;transition economy;Transition economies;

Downloads

COMPLETE REPORT

Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)

  • Official PDF
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.

Citation

Aksoy,M. Ataman Salinas,Gonzalo

Growth before and after trade liberalization (English). Policy, Research working paper ; no. WPS 4062 Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/622251468141266954/Growth-before-and-after-trade-liberalization