Skip to Main Navigation

IEG review of 20 World Bank-funded projects in tiger landscapes (English)

Biodiversity is critical to maintaining the integrity of ecosystems and the ecological processes that support species and human well-being. The world is facing an unprecedented rate of species extinction: one in eight bird species, one in four mammals, and one in three amphibians are threatened. Species can recover with concerted conservation. As a charismatic endangered species, tigers have become a powerful symbol of biodiversity loss globally, as their numbers have dropped from 100,000 at the turn of the 20th century to an estimated 3,000-3,500 tigers in the wild today. The need to protect tigers has taken on great urgency, and international efforts are attempting to pull them back from the edge of extinction. From November 21 to 24, 2010, the Russian Federation hosted leaders from 13 tiger range countries at a conference in St. Petersburg. The goal was inter alia to eliminate illegal trade in tiger parts while protecting tiger habitats and to double the tiger population by 2022. The World Bank has provided strong leadership and support for the initiative. Biodiversity interventions can have potentially large co benefits: biodiversity conservation, climate change stabilization, food and water security, and poverty reduction. The World Bank has been the largest financier for biodiversity, with commitments of more than $2 billion over the last two decades and substantial leveraging of co financing. However, the number of new projects approved that contain biodiversity activities has dropped considerably since the mid-2000s. At present, the Bank is according importance to biodiversity by taking a leading role in strategic partnerships, such as the Global Tiger Initiative (GTI), the Critical Ecosystems Partnership Fund (CEPF), and the Save Our Species (SOS) program. By prioritizing such initiatives, the Bank aims to bring crucial attention and funding to ecosystem and biodiversity conservation. It is also crucial at the same time to integrate conservation in development projects in sectors such as infrastructure and rural development, which can have negative effects on biodiversity without adequate mitigating actions. This review has shown that as important as these targeted biodiversity efforts is the need for the Bank, countries, and partners to strengthen efforts to integrate biodiversity conservation into projects in sectors where they can have negative biodiversity impacts without mitigating actions, such as rural transport, watershed management, or integrated rural development.

Details

  • Author

    Rees,Colin P., Worden, Richard Carlos

  • Document Date

    2011/01/01

  • Document Type

    Working Paper (Numbered Series)

  • Report Number

    63684

  • Volume No

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • Country

    World,

  • Region

    The World Region,

  • Disclosure Date

    2011/08/17

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Doc Name

    IEG review of 20 World Bank-funded projects in tiger landscapes

  • Keywords

    Save Our Species;Convention on International Trade;natural habitat;extension of closing date;water supply and sanitation;conservation of biological diversity;national parks and reserves;Urban & Social Development;Environmental and Social Safeguard;protected species;threats to tiger;Safeguard Policies;safeguard policy;significant adverse impact;Natural Resource Management;conservation of biodiversity;Environment Sector Unit;private sector engagement;threats to biodiversity;environmental assessment process;global public good;tiger range country;legally protected areas;integrated rural development;types of threats;wild tiger populations;staff appraisal reports;effects on biodiversity;biodiversity conservation efforts;regional environmental assessment;adverse environmental impact;loss of species;environmental safeguard policy;critical natural habitats;mitigation measure;indirect impact;potential threat;baseline data;Protected Habitats;natural areas;endangered species;cumulative impact;evaluation question;sensitive species;Natural Resources;rural transportation;mitigation plans;adequate supervision;bird species;international efforts;project impact;adequate mitigation;baseline study;standardized assessment;plant species;ecological condition;non-governmental organization;assessment method;biodiversity issues;water drainage;insufficient information;road work;grant financing;animal species;ecological process;negative effect;natural log;internal consistency;illegal poaching;small sample;information policy;precautionary measure;assessment tool;cumulative effect;environmental concern;government control;international convention;mitigation policy;water bodies;water use;worker camp;sustainability policy;baseline conditions;ecological niche;watershed management;issue note;Mainstreaming Biodiversity;steep decline;biological resource;conservation experts;local stakeholder;selection criterion;disposal area;assessment policy;transnational level;biodiversity index;strategic partnerships;land price;macro level;biodiversity experts;access road;environmental issue;environmental outcome;environmental context;wildlife crime;carbon market;targeted intervention;illegal trade;trade datum;applicable law;regional cooperation;public concern;tiger parts;network traffic;global biodiversity;biodiversity loss;ecosystem service;specific issue;tiger initiative;protection measure;level of support;habitat conservation;funding gap;biodiversity impact;sensitive habitat;subnational levels;soil erosion;species management;public consultation;ample opportunity;Road Networks;top predator;environmental monitoring;conservation value;logistical support;signaling effect;water erosion;species extinction;adaptive management;wildlife reserve;monitoring data;increased transparency;wildlife traffic;land-use patterns;social pressure;physical barrier;civil society;corrective action;authoritative sources;government oversight;viable populations;construction camp;development partner;migratory species;positive impact;

Downloads

COMPLETE REPORT

Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)

  • Official PDF
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.

Citation

Rees,Colin P. Worden, Richard Carlos

IEG review of 20 World Bank-funded projects in tiger landscapes (English). IEG evaluation brief Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/674841468177840086/IEG-review-of-20-World-Bank-funded-projects-in-tiger-landscapes