Skip to Main Navigation

Global ID Coverage, Barriers, and Use by the Numbers: An In-Depth Look at the 2017 ID4D-Findex Survey (English)

The ID4D-Findex data was collected as part of the 2017 round of the World Bank's Global Findex survey, carried out by Gallup, Inc. as part of its Gallup World poll. The survey was conducted on representative samples of the non-institutionalized civilian population over age 15.8 The survey included three questions related to ID that were asked in 97 countries: (1) whether or not a person had their country's national ID or equivalent foundational ID credential; (2) for those with the ID, whether they had used it for specific purposes; and (3) for those without the ID, what their reasons were for not having one. In five economies with no ID system or very limited coverage, people were asked a single question on whether or not they had been unable to access certain services due to lack of identity documents (see Annex 2 for full text of questions). Combined with other individual-level indicators from the 2017 Global Findex, these data provide new insights into who has an ID, how they are used, and persistent barriers to access. At the same time, the data have some limitations. First, while the ID4D-Findex questions cover countries that represent close the three-quarters of the world's population, they do not cover all countries. For example, most high-income countries, some low- and middle-income countries, and some smaller economies are not included. In total, the countries included in the ID4D-Findex data account for a little over 80 percent of the population in low and lower-middle income countries. Second, the Findex survey is limited to people ages 15 and older, and therefore does not capture the identity gap or correlates of identification for the youngest people. Importantly, we have restricted the analysis in this paper to those respondents who are above the age when the ID is mandatory, using information from the ID4D Global Dataset. In countries where the mandatory ID age is greater than 15 years old, excluding these observations provides more conservative estimates of the gap in identification than if they were included, as young people may not have an ID simply because they are not yet eligible or required to have one.

Details

  • Author

    Metz,Anna Zita, Clark,Julia Michal

  • Document Date

    2019/01/01

  • Document Type

    Working Paper

  • Report Number

    146705

  • Volume No

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • Country

    World,

  • Region

    The World Region,

  • Disclosure Date

    2020/03/06

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Doc Name

    Global ID Coverage, Barriers, and Use by the Numbers: An In-Depth Look at the 2017 ID4D-Findex Survey

  • Keywords

    government financial support; proof of identity; financial service; access to financial service; primary level of education; complete secondary school; access to mobile; social protection services; mobile service; government service; ID Systems; educated adult; Learning and Innovation Credit; mobile phone service; rural area; private sector service; identity documents; social protection program; government transfer; birth registration; million people; former soviet republics; Identification for Development; privileges and immunity; acquisition of citizenship; social security number; forum for woman; lower income countries; delivery of service; educated woman living; bottom income quintile; gap in access; women in society; person with disability; social protection initiative; high income economy; Birth of Child; cash transfer program; government and service; lack of money; financial service provider; mobile phone access; risk of exclusion; opportunity for woman; access to bank; primary school education; child support grant; financial account; government benefit; regression results; Gender Gap; household income; demographic group; marital status; mobile money; high share; fixed effect; voter registration; financial inclusion; application process; education level; income gap; birth certificate; young adult; point gap; geographic location; positive correlation; reasons given; minimum age; limited coverage; marginalized group; administrative datum; adult population; demand-side factor; negative correlation; regression table; urban dweller; rural dweller; digital identification; account opening; older adult; demographic predictors; education gap; middle-income economy; geographic area; married man; future research; account ownership; demographic factor; gender breakdown; low education; variable list; gender difference; individual level; Gender Inequality; government payment; inclusive development; financial benefit; coverage rate; fewer people; gender inequalities; Financial Sector; demographic characteristic; survey data; young people; legal barrier; daily life; mobile access; population registers; ownership rate; lost wages; marginalized communities; Health Economics; development perspective; supply constraint; new practice; unmarried man; educated people; bottom quintile; constant rate; married woman; weighted average; regression model; cash payment; money laundering; terrorist financing; documentation requirement; commercial bank; country survey; causal relationship; positive relationship; intended recipient; public pension; Global Gender; economic empowerment; civil conflict; first account; survey population; digital channel; other barriers; government pension; usage rate; government support; income individual; targeted population; social program; children's right; individual welfare; formal services; survey respondent; supply-side constraints; Public Services; necessary support; response rate; application requirement; citizenship certificate; childhood immunization; longer distance; rural woman; urban woman; rural man; disproportionate burden; financial issue; separate category; assessing progress; in school; building permit; formal sector; knowledge gap; civil registration; representative sample; civilian population; digital identity; small economy; digital age; raise awareness; identification system; informal mechanism; Thought Leadership; digital development; global knowledge; total sample; copyright owner; sole responsibility; original work; international foundation; assessing barrier; marginal effect; family relationship; electoral system; unique id; universal availability; negative coefficient; online transaction; quantitative evidence; digital world; rural population; urban location; open society; social media; base standard; large population; saharan africa; lower-income economy; high concentration; cultural barrier; vulnerable group; Ethnic Minorities; universal coverage; digital governance; odds ratio

Downloads

COMPLETE REPORT

Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)

  • Official PDF
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.

Citation

Metz,Anna Zita Clark,Julia Michal

Global ID Coverage, Barriers, and Use by the Numbers: An In-Depth Look at the 2017 ID4D-Findex Survey (English). Identification for Development Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/727021583506631652/Global-ID-Coverage-Barriers-and-Use-by-the-Numbers-An-In-Depth-Look-at-the-2017-ID4D-Findex-Survey