Skip to Main Navigation

Costs and benefits of agricultural price stabilization in Brazil (English)

In recent years, agricultural price stabilization policies have been recommended in Brazil as a way to reduce government intervention and open the sector for international trade without internalizing the instability of world prices. The proposal discussed (and eventually implemented in 1987) was to establish a system of price bands around a moving average of past prices, with the government relying on stocks to defend the bands. The authors evaluated the "band proposal" for six commodities, using historical data and posing this question: what would have happened if price bands had been adopted in the past six to ten years (compared with free trade)? There were two major findings. First, the implications of adopting a band-rule policy depend heavily on the specific characteristics of the commodities. Second, the welfare gains for risk reduction through agricultural price stabilization are unlikely to be large relative to the welfare gains from price reform that reduces market distortions for these six agricultural commodities. More research into the macroeconomic implications of price stabilization policies is necessary, particularly in countries with unstable but moderate rates of inflation.

Details

  • Author

    Braverman, Avishay Kanbur, Ravi Brandao, Antonio Salazar P. Hammer,Jeffrey S. Lopes, Mauro de Rezende Tan, Alexandra

  • Document Date

    1990/12/31

  • Document Type

    Policy Research Working Paper

  • Report Number

    WPS564

  • Volume No

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • Country

    Brazil,

  • Region

    Latin America & Caribbean,

  • Disclosure Date

    2010/07/01

  • Doc Name

    Costs and benefits of agricultural price stabilization in Brazil

  • Keywords

    coefficient of variation;producer price;consumer price;single market;informal risk sharing arrangements;price elasticity of supply;producer surplus;free trade price;world price;price stabilization;soy oil;soy meal;agricultural price stabilization;cost risk;average price;rate of inflation;equilibrium exchange rate;cotton producer;efficiency cost;relative risk;marketing of wheat;commodity price stabilization;revenue from sales;free trade policy;wheat producer;tax on consumers;official exchange rate;free trade regime;stabilization of price;soybean producer;impact on productivity;level of consumption;effect of price;benefit to consumer;elasticity of demand;negative supply shock;complete free trade;average real wage;system of price;welfare gains;agricultural commodity;risk premium;reference price;price band;risk analysis;government intervention;international market;transfer benefit;historical data;average values;price instability;efficiency gain;price reform;domestic price;income stream;government deficit;net effect;risk market;macroeconomic implication;market distortion;trade flow;reasonably high;domestic demand;export demand;soybean price;risk benefits;nominal wage;average revenue;agricultural expenditure;average consumer;deadweight loss;consumer income;fiscal deficit;policy regime;rice production;soybean production;rainfed area;minimum price;transportation cost;Government Accounts;rice marketing;price fluctuation;driving force;wide band;market analysis;open economy;traded goods;market specification;implicit tax;price series;food crop;textile industry;Political Economy;food staple;trade advantages;efficiency loss;export commodity;credit rationing;utility function;implied deficit;supply elasticity;average consumption;irrigated land;data availability;capacity utilization;export quota;important component;joint product;net result;domestic supply;wholesale price;human consumption;Exchange Rates;government budget;guarantee price;domestic producer;wheat market;market imperfection;demand curve;government benefit;foreign demand;private storage;risk aversion;equilibrium condition;intervention price;complete liberalization;wheat yield;supply function;budgetary cost;competitive equilibrium;future research;random variable;price variation;price policy;sensitivity analysis;risk averse;income variability;income risk;agricultural producer;equity implication;urban agricultural policy;quantitative analysis;high inflation;Stabilization policies;International Trade;social gains;price decline;high wage;price differential;net importer;net exporter;government stocks;credit constraint;small producer;factor productivity;storage cost;estimate impact;

Downloads

COMPLETE REPORT

Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)

  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.

Citation

Braverman, Avishay Kanbur, Ravi Brandao, Antonio Salazar P. Hammer,Jeffrey S. Lopes, Mauro de Rezende Tan, Alexandra

Costs and benefits of agricultural price stabilization in Brazil (English). Policy, Research, and External Affairs working papers ; no. WPS 564. Agricultural policies Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/732851468743394429/Costs-and-benefits-of-agricultural-price-stabilization-in-Brazil