Skip to Main Navigation

Tailor-made off the shelf: reducing the cost and construction time of thermal power plants (English)

Over the last ten years, the average cost and construction time of greenfield fossil fuel-fired power plants has been reduced by approximately 50, even as their performance has improved. This is the result of technological changes and increased competitive pressures arising from the deregulation of power markets. This paper provides an overview of steps that have been taken by the power industry to respond to this challenge by designing and building standardized power plants based on sound technical solutions and optimized economics, with short preparation and construction times and a high degree of operational reliability. The paper deals with the key factors which have contributed to these changes: standardization of power plant designs; modularization; automation of power plant design; technological improvements; and the impact of these changes on design and manufacturing of power plants in developing countries. The paper discusses the advantages of the approach for the client and supplier. Modularization Significantly Reduces the Costs of Thermal Power Plants. Compared with the customized approach for project design and construction, modularization can significantly reduce project-financing costs (by up to 10 percent) in three categories: detailed engineering and supervision, price contingencies and interest during construction.

Details

  • Author

    O'Leary,Donal T., Paul, Ingo, Taud, Robert

  • Document Date

    1999/03/01

  • Document Type

    Newsletter

  • Report Number

    30524

  • Volume No

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • Country

    World,

  • Region

    The World Region,

  • Disclosure Date

    2010/07/01

  • Doc Name

    Tailor-made off the shelf: reducing the cost and construction time of thermal power plants

  • Keywords

    gas;fuel gas;Finance, Private Sector & Infrastructure;Gas Turbine;steam power plants;market for gas;cycle plant;oil;output classes;power system;primarily due;thermal power plant;detailed engineering design;market for power;interest during construction;computer aided engineering;turbine generator;construction and operation;delivery contract;low cost fuels;construction time;modular approach;power industry;gas plant;modular structure;price decline;project risk;black box;market requirement;plant capacity;electrical utility;ambient condition;Investment Flow;limited resources;power capacity;efficiency improvement;telecommunications sector;software tool;electricity producer;short supply;plant structure;generation technology;data bank;cycle technology;document management;Energy Sector;cost control;average cost;cross sectoral;liquidated damages;civil works;cycle system;coal supply;steam line;automotive industry;car seats;high pressure;capacity addition;fuel requirement;heat extraction;regional location;plant size;generating capacity;reliable technology;high power;demand growth;demand analysis;equipment supplier;price contingency;environmental permit;project costing;special requirements;driving force;technological change;technological improvement;market cost;price level;noise requirements;market growth;industrialized country;Industrialized countries;partnership program;fuel quality;fuel specification;Standard Product;computer application;plant design;turbine output;local condition;