Skip to Main Navigation

Rwanda - Food Security and Social Action Project (English)

The outcome of the Food Security and Social Action Project is rated as satisfactory. Conditions internal and external to Rwanda affected project development, impact, and success. Throughout the project's life, Rwanda experienced political instability, internal and regional insecurity, and suffered from a lack of institutional capacity. The lessons learned from this project include: 1) Post-conflict environments necessitate malleable project designs in order to be able to adapt to the often rapidly changing conditions as to what is feasible and what is desirable. 2) Speed and ownership are a regular trade-off for interventions in a post-conflict environment. In an emergency period, implementation through an independent agency may be most efficient as long as local capacities are too weak to carry out such activities. 3) Projects in post-conflict countries should pay particular attention to financial management. Weak government capacity and the lack of adequate financial controls require the close monitoring of funds. 4) Micro-credit activities, which by nature require some level of stability within the environment they are implemented, may not be appropriate in post-conflict environments. 5) Monitoring and evaluation should be conducted regularly so as to be able to make snap decisions and respond expediently to matters in a changing and sometimes volatile environment.


  • Document Date


  • Document Type

    Implementation Completion and Results Report

  • Report Number


  • Volume No


  • Total Volume(s)


  • Country


  • Region


  • Disclosure Date


  • Disclosure Status


  • Doc Name

    Rwanda - Food Security and Social Action Project

  • Keywords

    rural water supply and sanitation;Petites et Moyennes Entreprises;Food Security and Nutrition;small and medium enterprise;small and medium size enterprise;quality at entry;quality of work;community development plans;structural adjustment program;number of beneficiaries;institutional development impact;income generating activity;principal performance ratings;cost recovery systems;preparation of bids;storage of food;participation of woman;costs of storage;food security component;cost of transportation;quality of infrastructure;children per woman;lack of skill;emergency social fund;capacity building component;construction of market;rehabilitation of road;ratings of bank;process of decentralization;participatory research method;gnp per capita;outputs by components;reconstruction and rehabilitation;local capacity building;social action program;improving food security;distribution of food;rehabilitation of infrastructure;improvements in health;quality and quantity;procedure for implementation;water source development;exchange rate;Internally Displaced Person;Exchange Rates;planning and design;access to water;vulnerable group;rural area;beneficiary assessment;economic infrastructure;Civil War;local development;Social Welfare;international community;nutrition education;food aid;beneficiary contribution;local ngo;repayment rate;social capital;productive activity;long-term poverty;borrower performance;quality materials;civil works;population group;local population;enterprise management;administrative management;aids victim;Nutrition Training;unit price;bank of knowledge;spring development;building technique;personnel management;community activity;mass migration;adequate training;beneficiary group;difficult environment;social surveys;living standard;rural commune;community initiative;permanent employment;government structure;local contractor;center rehabilitation;institutional strengthening;emergency operation;long-term impact;food relief;raise funds;socioeconomic infrastructure;inadequate fund;financial matter;summary ratings;opposition party;financial rate;important component;urban context;beneficiary participation;internal displacement;satisfactory rating;component of phase;train activity;rural community;institutional choice;administrative problem;consulting engineer;road work;nutrition service;environmental awareness;supervisory staff;roof structure;international consultant;urban bias;beneficiary survey;local bank;transportation cost;private transport;family service;primary author;rural market;contaminated water;community involvement;business start-ups;business experience;qualified personnel;risky borrower;potential debtor;repayment period;government ownership;urban development;community priority;labor-intensive work;social need;abject poverty;project sustainability;sustainability rating;local group;political instability;government control;People Skills;public expenditure;sectoral planning;local infrastructure;Population Displacement;small-scale activity;procedure manual;financial constraint;pilot activities;community ownership;employment generation;community level;failure rate;lending process;political manipulation;loan repayment;project finance;severely limits;security threat;working condition;construction site;fertility rate;working day;social activities;rebel movement;aids epidemic;malnutrition rates;food production;local participation;demographic growth;temporary job;infrastructure work;site inspection;audit mission;food delivery;regular monitoring;emergency need;community needs;community-based development;expenditure authority;constructive dialogue;refugee camp;international donor;enterprise promotion;short period;credit effectiveness;peace process;peace negotiation;environmental aspect;adjustment measure;general population;target social;international agency;real gdp;peace agreement;project impact;poverty relief;Population Density;poor community;financial resource;unaccompanied children;sized enterprise;social fabric



Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)

  • Official PDF
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.


Rwanda - Food Security and Social Action Project (English). Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group.