As countries consider how to reopen schools safely in the context of COVID-19 (coronavirus), one key question is how to assess students' learning to support learning recovery. The expected magnitude of learning losses, particularly among students with the highest needs, makes it essential for key stakeholders in the education process — policymakers, teachers, school principals, students, and their parents — to determine where students are in their learning trajectory relative to what had been expected prior to the pandemic, so they can adjust instruction and allocate resources accordingly. To collect this information, stakeholders can rely on student learning assessment, which is an essential feedback mechanism in the education system. This note provides key steps that countries with different availability of resources should consider in developing their plans for learning assessment activities to support learning recovery in the context of school reopening. Throughout this note, assessment of student learning is defined as gathering and evaluating information on what students know, understand, and can do to make informed decisions about the next steps in the educational process. In addition, some considerations and country examples for the implementation of high-stakes examinations are discussed. This note concludes with examples of learning assessment activities that countries around the world are planning or implementing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Likewise, this note highlights important lessons that can support resilience to future emergencies and crises.
Details
-
Author
-
Document Date
2020/11/21
-
Document Type
Report
-
Report Number
154566
-
Volume No
1
-
Total Volume(s)
1
-
Country
-
Region
-
Disclosure Date
2020/11/24
-
Disclosure Status
Disclosed
-
Doc Name
Guidance Note on Using Learning Assessment in the Process of School Reopening
-
Keywords
Teachers; large-scale assessment; assessment tool; learning assessment; efficient allocation of resource; stakeholder need; school year; availability of resource; school closure; core subject; national assessment agency; subject matter expert; Student Learning Assessment; literacy and numeracy; years of schooling; assessment activity; daily teaching practice; national assessment system; provision of resource; colleges and university; children must; information in table; interaction between teacher; educational testing service; adequate quality control; resource allocation decision; other education stakeholder; teacher training material; degree centralization; work at home; provision of teacher; assessment result; the administration; early grade; learning trajectory; diagnostic assessment; summative assessment; assessment material; limited resources; personalized instruction; individual student; high-stakes examination; curriculum content; lesson plan; supplementary training; data management; base assessment; test administrator; assessment process; target school; feedback mechanism; in school; learning standard; financial resource; learning process; classroom practice; classroom activity; education process; Formative Assessment; learning level; assessing student; safety measure; administrative datum; educational process; Education Policy; content development; subject area; logistics requirement; test development; digital materials; learning resource; digital format; curriculum specialist; oral question; test administration; instructional resource; learning material; pedagogical approach; student population; stake examination; comprehensive strategy; performance level; trained teacher; core curriculum; methodological approach; educational technology; assessment framework; international agreement; curriculum material; test score; best use; participating country; school level; time constraint; Coping Mechanisms; complementary learning; foundational competency; social study; social studies; assessment task; diagnostic tool; school district; school time; diagnostic approach; electronic form; online portal; safety precaution; curricular reform; online resources; clear definition; peer support; online training; broader community; instructional practice; remote instruction; contingency plan; learning need; available resources; individual level; resource availability; teaching model; instructional strategy; broad curriculum; conflict settings; classroom use; higher grade; assessment data; several weeks; small sample; school equipment; global pandemic; parental involvement; empirical result; standard deviation; school type; Higher Education; dutch language; electronic device; inclusive school; digital divide; Education Financing; information base; children's health; learning environment; social interaction; school environment; education systems; student participation; achievement level; constrained environment; severe consequence; learning opportunity; cognitive development; Online Learning; achievement data; verification procedures; data quality; assessment program; paper packet; disadvantaged student; seasonal factor; scarce resource; regular school; social crisis; disadvantaged family
- See More
Downloads
COMPLETE REPORT
Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)
- DOCX
- Official PDF
- TXT*
- Total Downloads** :
- Download Stats
-
*The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.
Citation
Luna Bazaldua,Diego Armando Levin,Victoria Liberman,Julia
Guidance Note on Using Learning Assessment in the Process of School Reopening (English). Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/856951606239586214/Guidance-Note-on-Using-Learning-Assessment-in-the-Process-of-School-Reopening