Skip to Main Navigation

Three-year or four-year replenishment cycle results of consultation with donors (English)

In August 2000, IDA donors were sent a set of questions to solicit their views and guidance on the possibility raised at the Lisbon meeting that IDA replenishments might cover a four-year period, with a mid-term review after two years. For IDA13 this four-year period would cover FY2003 through FY2006. Seventeen out of thirty eight donors responded to the survey. This note summarizes donors' responses, grouped into four categories: (1) donors' budgetary and legislative processes; (2) efficiency gains; (3) midterm review; and (4) resources mobilized. The balance of opinion seemed to be that retaining the three-year cycle in IDA13 was the preferred course at this time. Several noted, however, that there could be merit in revisiting the issue later in the replenishment process.

Details

  • Document Date

    2001/01/01

  • Document Type

    Board Report

  • Report Number

    26496

  • Volume No

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • Country

    World,

  • Region

    The World Region,

  • Disclosure Date

    2010/07/01

  • Doc Name

    Three-year or four-year replenishment cycle results of consultation with donors

  • Keywords

    global public good;efficiency gain;legislative process;legislative procedure;internal process;administrative efficiency;allocation issue;proportional increase;budgetary allocation;

Downloads

COMPLETE REPORT

Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)

  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.

Citation

Three-year or four-year replenishment cycle results of consultation with donors (English). IDA13 Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/869181468762615943/Three-year-or-four-year-replenishment-cycle-results-of-consultation-with-donors