Using mixed methods in monitoring and evaluation : experiences from international development (English)

This paper provides an overview of the various ways in which mixing qualitative and quantitative methods could add value to monitoring and evaluating development projects. In particular it examines how qualitative methods could address some of the limitations of randomized trials and other quantitative impact evaluation methods; it also explores the importance of examining "process" in addition to "impact", distinguishing design from implementation...

DETAILS

Author

Bamberger,J. Michael;

Rao,Vijayendra;

Woolcock,Michael;
Document Date
2010/03/01
Document Type
Policy Research Working Paper
Report Number
WPS5245
Volume No
1
Total Volume(s)
1
Country
World,
Region
Other,
Disclosure Date
2010/07/01
Disclosure Status
Disclosed
Doc Name
Using mixed methods in monitoring and evaluation : experiences from international development
Keywords
mixed methods

DOWNLOADS

COMPLETE REPORT

Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)

Official PDF
TXT*
Total Downloads** : 13600
Download Stats
*The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.

Citation

Bamberger,J. Michael; Rao,Vijayendra; Woolcock,Michael.

Using mixed methods in monitoring and evaluation : experiences from international development (English). Policy Research working paper ; no. WPS 5245 Washington, DC: World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/884171468156574032

Using mixed methods in monitoring and evaluation : experiences from international development (English)

DETAILS

DOWNLOADS

COMPLETE REPORT

Citation

SUBSCRIBE TO EMAIL ALERTS