Skip to Main Navigation

Poverty lines in theory and practice (English)

As a part of the Living Standards Measurement Study, this paper presents a critical overview of alternative approaches towards setting poverty lines, which: a) define the minimum level of living standards before being considered "poor"; and, b) make comparisons among these minimum levels, for families of different size and/or composition in different locations and time. The paper argues that economists have emphasized the second role, while generally ignoring the first. Experience suggests that the poverty measures obtained, and the inference for policy derived, are affected by the choice made in setting poverty lines. In critically reviewing the methods found in practice, the paper aims to analyze, and attempts to resolve, ongoing debates about poverty measurements, highlighting the issues bearing the most on policy discussions. The paper discusses two methods within objective poverty lines: food-energy intake, and the cost of basic needs. Subjective poverty lines are discussed in the context of minimum income question, used in many developed countries, while pointing out its pitfalls in the context of developing countries. The paper concludes with a discussion of poverty lines found in practice, as opposed to the theoretical ones mentioned above.

Details

  • Author

    Ravallion, Martin

  • Document Date

    1998/07/31

  • Document Type

    Publication

  • Report Number

    LSM133

  • Volume No

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • Disclosure Date

    2010/07/01

  • Doc Name

    Poverty lines in theory and practice

  • Keywords

    cost of living index;marginal rate of substitution;poverty does;food energy intake;bundle of goods;basic consumption need;total consumption expenditure;indirect utility function;food energy requirement;measure of poverty;relative poverty line;standard of living;making poverty comparison;subjective poverty line;average food share;absolute poverty line;household survey data;total poverty line;study of poverty;implications for policy;food poverty line;distribution of welfare;calories per day;food-energy intake conditional;term of people;choice of method;conventional poverty measure;urban informal sector;distribution-sensitive poverty measure;difference in poverty;differential in poverty;high poverty line;single poverty line;urban poverty line;resulting poverty line;elasticity of poverty;expenditure on consumption;distribution of consumption;regional poverty measure;consumption of commodity;poverty gap index;square poverty gap;number of attempts;demand for food;distribution of expenditure;rural area;utility level;real income;welfare measurement;relative price;poverty profile;real expenditure;Poverty Measurement;nutritional requirement;demand behavior;food-energy requirement;welfare indicator;expenditure function;food component;Poverty measures;urban sector;demand model;monetary poverty;real value;caloric intake;average consumption;active life;measured poverty;fighting poverty;expected value;budget share;functional form;headcount index;welfare comparison;household characteristic;consumer preference;consumer demand;urban household;nutritional intake;empirical relationship;welfare consistency;basic capability;consumption bundle;agricultural labor;increasing function;measuring poverty;money income;living condition;minimum level;high energy;consumer behavior;poverty bundle;household data;local price;reference level;envelope property;consistent poverty;urban poor;urban resident;nominal poverty;expensive calorie;intermediate level;animal protein;constant value;theoretical model;measure of use;indifference curve;welfare economics;horizontal axis;measured increase;nutrient intake;nominal expenditures;food bundle;retail outlet;reference price;welfare level;price change;regression function;prevailing price;caloric shortfall;price vector;consumption poverty;agreed metric;rural line;information base;expensive food;alternative consumption;monetary cost;substitution effect;conventional approach;urban bias;conventional money;noncommercial purposes;empirical evidence;poverty problem;qualitative comparison;public program;standard practice;european commission;demographic composition;national income;public resource;fundamental problem;external information;poverty datum;aggregate poverty;data needs;data processing;copyright notice;intermediate product;transport cost;urban job;body weight;aggregate measure;rural activity;political activities;food intake;Rural Sector;Social Welfare;civil society;median income;basic good;utility poverty;income question;upper bind;classroom use;minimum wage;publicly-provided good;assessing welfare;poverty ranking;prices increase;consumer choice;data requirement;individual welfare;basic food;caloric requirement;consumption vector;budget constraint;food good;consumption pattern;human body;metabolic rate;budget allocation;good health;random variable;demand function;

Downloads

COMPLETE REPORT

Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)

  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.

Citation

Ravallion, Martin

Poverty lines in theory and practice (English). Living standards measurement study (LSMS) working paper ; no. LSM 133 Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/916871468766156239/Poverty-lines-in-theory-and-practice