Skip to Main Navigation

Reducing error, fraud, and corruption (EFC) in social protection programs (English)

Social Protection (SP) and Social Safety Net (SSN) programs channel a large amount of public resources, it is important to make sure that these reach the intended beneficiaries. Error, fraud, or corruption (EFC) reduces the economic efficiency of these interventions by decreasing the amount of money that goes to the intended beneficiaries, and erodes the political support for the program. While no program is immune to EFC, evidence from developed countries demonstrates that such leakage can be brought to negligible levels. In five Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries (UK, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and USA) this fraction is between 2-5 percent for the SP sector as a whole. For SSN programs, which use more complex eligibility criteria and hence are more prone to EFC, this fraction is 10 percent. To achieve these results, programs have implemented a number of measures reviewed in this note. In contrast, efforts to combat or even measure EFC are quite rare in developing countries, although some programs are plagued by it.


  • Author

    Tesliuc, Emil Daniel Milazzo, Annamaria

  • Document Date


  • Document Type


  • Report Number


  • Volume No


  • Total Volume(s)


  • Country


  • Region

    The World Region,

  • Disclosure Date


  • Disclosure Status


  • Doc Name

    Reducing error, fraud, and corruption (EFC) in social protection programs

  • Keywords

    conditional cash transfer program;supreme audit institution;social protection spending;safety net program;public awareness campaign;determination of eligibility;sum of money;economies of scale;disability living allowance;amount of fund;Social Safety Nets;system Financial;quality control reviews;safety net policy;impact on poverty;international social security;social security system;total public spending;social protection sector;Social Protection Benefits;quality control procedure;eligibility criterion;intended beneficiary;improper payment;public resource;administrative procedure;spot check;old-age pension;small sample;preventative measure;political support;Learning and Innovation Credit;registration process;benefit system;opportunity cost;administrative cost;benefit scheme;economic crisis;accountability mechanism;institutional context;program objectives;federal level;ample evidence;social program;municipal control;service contract;program eligibility;economic efficiency;payment accounting;exclusion error;Cash flow;reporting requirement;payment process;civil society;toll free;call center;payment date;criminal offense;operational procedure;eligible family;workfare program;random sample;disability pension;low rate;fraudulent claim;administrative capacity;adequate procedures;eligibility requirement;total saving;retirement pension;unemployment benefit;housing program;credit program;employment program;institutional responsibilities;program budget;clear definition;reporting fraud;risk profile;public attitude;illegal payment;measurement tool;political bias;regular oversight;payment mechanism;financial audits;financial penalty;social control;beneficiary list;local program;survey data;political interference;small fraction;target beneficiary;benefit amount;poverty status;administrative datum;system processing;representative sample;confidence interval;gold standard;disability insurance;unique identifier;false statement;corruption;



Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)

  • Official PDF
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.


Tesliuc, Emil Daniel Milazzo, Annamaria

Reducing error, fraud, and corruption (EFC) in social protection programs (English). Social Safety Nets Primer Notes ; no. 26 Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group.