This report is part of a body of work that looks at various aspects of interjurisdiction cooperation, from assessing sectors or areas for interjurisdictional cooperation in Romania to exploring international case studies and drawing key lessons to inform the 2021-2027 programming period, with a focus on the 39 Article 7 urban areas. The report first examines how the sustainable urban development (SUD) approach has been applied across the European Union (EU) and analyzes several case studies in more depth. It then examines organizational models that have been used in Romania to date and concludes by making recommendations on how these can be further refined to enhance their performance. The case studies in the report focus primarily on EU countries that had substantial SUD 2014-2020 allocations, or innovative SUD approaches.
Details
-
Author
Kriss,Paul, Ionescu-Heroiu,Marcel, Cristea,Marius, Silimela,Yondela Tembakazi, Borkowska-Waszak,Sylwia Magdalena, Ivanov,Ioana, Taralunga,Nicolae, Racoviceanu,Sorina Constanta, Stadler,Reinhold-Lehel, Manea,Maria Magdalena, Vintan,Adina Dorina, Moldoveanu,George Alexandru, Ghintuiala,Daiana-Luisa, Sfarlea,Eva Viorela
-
Document Date
2019/12/01
-
Document Type
Working Paper
-
Report Number
145524
-
Volume No
1
-
Total Volume(s)
1
-
Country
-
Region
-
Disclosure Date
2021/02/02
-
Disclosure Status
Disclosed
-
Doc Name
Romania Catching-Up Regions : Organizational Models for Interjurisdictional Agreements
-
Keywords
urban development; organizational models; small and medium enterprise; sustainable urban development; broad range of stakeholders; reimbursable advisory services; metropolitan area; urban development strategy; cohesion policy; private sector representative; national economic growth; thematic area; growth and development; large urban areas; urban development agenda; million people; ex post evaluation; regional development policy; social cohesion policy; international good practice; private sector engagement; environment fund; geographic information system; level of capacity; regional development agency; transfer of competence; allocation of fund; lack of resource; environment for innovation; multiple funding sources; large metropolitan areas; high population density; urban agglomeration; urban agenda; core city; Investment priorities; investment priority; urban authority; urban dimension; lagging region; local actors; project selection; citizen engagement; administrative boundary; urban investment; Capital Investments; the administration; non-governmental organization; integrated strategy; heating source; boiler replacement; regional decentralization; learning program; regional growth; pilot program; national coordinator; regional space; urban mobility; project impact; fund period; environmental sustainability; audit authority; high concentration; coastal area; demographic decline; local public; private entity; development partner; regional policy; fiscal resource; clear delineation; social dimension; competitive selection; thematic focus; subsidiary right; big city; regional capital; geographical area; noncommercial purposes; sustainable city; access funding; funds target; institutional mechanism; inclusive cities; legal instrument; investment target; investment impact; complementary investment; building resource; local reality; urban administration; social exclusion; new house; administrative capacity; explicit interest; urban level; urban action; national policy; financial instrument; long-term strategy; external intervention; institutional change; public intervention; local knowledge; urban system; public policy; external knowledge; urban policy; economic recovery; effective governance; citizen participation; high performance; fiscal instrument; economic crisis; targeted assistance; Earmarked Funding; educational institution; business support; international financing; regional investment; local municipality; smaller number; territorial planning; national authority; recent years; regional model; social infrastructure; partnership agreement; research centre; similar way; best practice; operational flexibility; investment need; knowledge integration; regional economy; urban plan; fund allocations; Public-Private Partnership; international case; urban people; urban territory; urban regeneration; legal form
- See More
Downloads
COMPLETE REPORT
Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)
- Official PDF
- TXT*
- Total Downloads** :
- Download Stats
-
*The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.
Citation
Kriss,Paul Ionescu-Heroiu,Marcel Cristea,Marius Silimela,Yondela Tembakazi Borkowska-Waszak,Sylwia Magdalena Ivanov,Ioana Taralunga,Nicolae Racoviceanu,Sorina Constanta Stadler,Reinhold-Lehel Manea,Maria Magdalena Vintan,Adina Dorina Moldoveanu,George Alexandru Ghintuiala,Daiana-Luisa Sfarlea,Eva Viorela
Romania Catching-Up Regions : Organizational Models for Interjurisdictional Agreements (English). Romania: Catching-Up Regions Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/956461580281209888/Romania-Catching-Up-Regions-Organizational-Models-for-Interjurisdictional-Agreements