Skip to Main Navigation

The development of monitoring and evaluation capacities to improve government performance in Uganda : Desarrollo de la capacidad de seguimiento y evaluacion para mejorar el desempeno del estado en Uganda (Spanish)

The analysis takes the functioning of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) within the Uganda public sector, rather than the needs and requirements of the external donor community, as its main point of departure. The objective of M&E is seen as the improvement of the performance and effectiveness of government and its public service delivery system. M&E relates to more than the technical aspects of data collection: it ultimately derives its value not from the availability of accurate data per se, but from the way in which they are used to improve decision-making. M&E functions when it supplies managers with a flow of reliable information and analysis about what works and what doesn't as a basis for policy recommendations, optimizing resource allocation, refining institutional strategies, changing the mix of public service products or suppliers, assessing performance of staff, or underpinning accountability requirements. Because M&E addresses the performance of governments in responding to their citizens' needs and priorities, it is ultimately an issue of good public governance.

Details

  • Author

    Hauge,Arild O.

  • Document Date

    2003/10/16

  • Document Type

    Working Paper (Numbered Series)

  • Report Number

    38270

  • Volume No

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • Country

    World,

  • Region

    The World Region,

  • Disclosure Date

    2007/01/03

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Doc Name

    Desarrollo de la capacidad de seguimiento y evaluacion para mejorar el desempeno del estado en Uganda

  • Keywords

    public service delivery;Household Income and Expenditure Survey;Demographic and Health Survey;monitoring and evaluation system;absolute poverty line decrease;public expenditure tracking survey;decentralization of service delivery;point of departure;sector working;availability of data;government service delivery;public sector reform;national service delivery;flow of fund;expenditure tracking studies;public management reform;availability of information;national poverty eradication;data quality;term of people;government service providers;public service provider;structure of incentive;data collection system;public service management;government budget process;cost of travel;accumulation of data;lack of demand;service delivery process;degree of assurance;public management system;assignment of responsibility;performance measure and;national budget process;integrated financial management;medium-term expenditure framework;degree of performance;release of fund;standard of accountability;observed poverty reduction;quality of public;flow of resource;senior government official;medium term expenditure;Human Immunodeficiency Virus;poverty reduction goal;internal accountability mechanism;analysis of poverty;Planning and Operations;service delivery chain;rate of growth;national development planning;incidence of poverty;budget execution problems;impact on poverty;areas of service;inspection activity;Public Services;accountability institution;donor community;budget support;reporting requirement;public finance;operational management;external assistance;water sector;public action;budget analysis;routine monitoring;active participant;information collection;reporting system;public affair;Economic Management;policy formulation;national authority;government operation;public accountability;performance management;continuous assessment;poverty outcome;public monitoring;budget resource;stakeholder consultation;budget cycle;outcome targets;information flow;operational function;qualitative dimension;accountability requirement;household poverty;district planning;population survey;focus group;poverty impact;donor support;non-governmental organization;government decision-makers;poverty trend;daily operation;reform effort;quality datum;delivery targets;political level;public governance;budget request;institutional responsibilities;external source;local stakeholder;information standard;expenditure quality;national progress;poverty indicator;program objectives;recipient countries;parent-teacher association;school completion;domestic demand;central coordination;data system;government action;independent assessment;institutional environment;inspection visit;national decision-makers;health clinics;sound management;bureaucratic requirement;evaluation association;professional body;research exercise;personnel management;indigenous capacity;public notice;governance reform;understanding poverty;skill formation;limited resources;awareness building;long-term process;clear view;performance information;accountability framework;public perception;Budget Management;common problems;organizational development;basic school;target setting;external support;public funding;National Institutions;reporting obligation;water point;effective participation;annual disbursement;research institution;sector-wide approaches;parallel financing;separate agreement;decentralized management;increasing share;anticorruption law;account committee;budget reform;expenditure monitoring;expenditure plan;poverty study;poverty research;anticorruption strategy;anticorruption effort;research institutions;government establishment;funding support;operational planning;budget framework;Macroeconomic Stability;expenditure reduction;annual expenditure;primary health;Agricultural Extension;systems approach;performance culture;logistical resource;donor coordination;transaction cost;government spending;fund allocations;draft policy;effective monitoring;performance orientation;donor funding;Natural Resources

Downloads

COMPLETE REPORT

Official version of document (may contain signatures, etc)

  • Official PDF
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *The text version is uncorrected OCR text and is included solely to benefit users with slow connectivity.

Citation

Hauge,Arild O.

The development of monitoring and evaluation capacities to improve government performance in Uganda : Desarrollo de la capacidad de seguimiento y evaluacion para mejorar el desempeno del estado en Uganda (Spanish). IEG Methods and Evaluation Capacity Development (ECD) working paper series,no. 10 Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/959391468170675511/Desarrollo-de-la-capacidad-de-seguimiento-y-evaluacion-para-mejorar-el-desempeno-del-estado-en-Uganda