Skip to Main Navigation

Pakistan - Partnership for Polio Eradication Project (Inglês)

The purpose of the Partnership for Polio Eradication Project is to assist the Government of Pakistan in its efforts to eradicate Poliomyelitis, by supporting the supply of additional oral polio vaccines (OPV) for the country's 2003-05 supplementary immunization activities. The project will provide financing for only the first component, i.e., the procurement of OPV, to immunize all children of up to 5 years of age. Vaccines will be procured through the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). The second component, entails supplemental operations through three main activities: maintenance of a cold chain, social mobilization, and training. Before each round of immunization, extensive micro-planning, social mobilization campaigns, and training of participants will be conducted to ensure effective implementation, particularly, in reaching targeted groups. The third component provides support for epidemiological, and laboratory surveillance. A technical advisory group will meet periodically, who will provide the Government with detailed analysis of the program performance, its status, and recommended actions.

Detalhes

  • Data do documento

    2003/04/21

  • TIpo de documento

    Documento de avaliação do projeto:

  • No. do relatório

    25461

  • Nº do volume

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • País

    Madagascar,

  • Região

    Sul da Ásia,

  • Data de divulgação

    2010/07/01

  • Nome do documento

    Pakistan - Partnership for Polio Eradication Project

  • Palavras-chave

    polio eradication;days of onset of paralysis;tb control;project rationale;quality of health services;maternal and child health;Center for Disease Control;primary health care facilities;blood transfusion services;monitoring and evaluation system;access to health service;global public good;polio eradication program;social mobilization;social development outcome;routine immunization services;communicable disease control;routine immunization coverage;polio eradication campaign;net present value;release of fund;public health intervention;confirmed polio cases;polio eradication effort;readiness for implementation;complete family;coverage of children;infant mortality rate;applicable safeguard policies;exchange rate;Exchange Rates;children per woman;total fertility rate;burden of disease;community based intervention;per capita income;crowded living condition;devolution of power;public sector expenditure;safety net program;independent external auditor;accounting of funds;public health programs;preventive health services;public private partnership;public-private partnership;rapid population growth;collaboration with ngos;population at large;public health problem;circulation of virus;acute flaccid paralysis;public health expenditure;children at risk;prevention of disability;high infant mortality;eradication of polio;public health facility;political stability;supply of vaccine;cold chain equipment;vitamin a deficiency;mobilization of resource;global polio eradication;spread of hiv;health care practitioner;negative environmental impact;future world population;immunization activity;surveillance datum;polio vaccine;eradication strategy;funding gap;global eradication;community group;political support;vaccination campaign;loan condition;endemic provinces;surveillance quality;draft agreement;surveillance system;community mobilization;multilateral agency;external resource;international standard;international community;eradication efforts;political will;community support;project finance;endemic country;borrower commitment;safeguard policy;government strategy;Infectious Disease;health systems;effectiveness condition;health issue;disease eradication;engineering design;international agency;Environmental Assessment;impact indicator;government representative;management structure;joint training;program planning;program strengthening;external source;anecdotal evidence;animal reservoir;primary beneficiaries;permanent immunity;diagnostic specimens;fiduciary requirements;participatory approach;bilateral agency;environmental issue;appraisal mission;health authorities;financially support;monitoring indicator;procurement issue;traditional practitioners;social issue;environment management;direct payment;environmental screening;smallpox eradication;auditing procedure;private foundations;recurrent budgets;lessons learnt;qualitative assessment;political commitment;community control;institutional review;resource mobilization;project execution;multilateral fund;utilization rate;health specialist;regular structure;cost-benefit analysis;private donor;national immunization;terrorist threat;Disease Surveillance;procurement documents;government structure;disadvantaged area;cost-effective intervention;air time;global effort;mass media;raise awareness;population census;international procurement;procurement procedure;credit proceeds;outstanding balance;financial statement;program administrator;managerial leadership;business environment;creating opportunity;sector priorities;poor child;disadvantaged child;poverty focus;unsanitary condition;output monitoring;human suffering;social burden;diagnostic services;general population;health status;scarce resource;global benefit;national ones;cost breakdown;adequate supply;laboratory surveillance;international expert;program performance;health resource;health outcome;grant funding;disease burden;Public Spending;private service;Public Services;outpatient care;global responsibility;hospital service;management capacity;Maternal Health

Downloads

COMPLETAR RELATÓRIO

Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)

  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.