Skip to Main Navigation

Sudan national multi donor trust fund portfolio : environmental and social safeguards performance review (Inglês)

The report presents the findings of a study conducted in July 2012 of the application of World Bank safeguard policies to projects supported by the Multi-Donor Trust Fund-National (MDTF-NS) from 2006 to the present. The report begins with a brief background section to describe the context of the MDTF-NS, the objectives of the report, the methodology and scope of the report. The principal objective of the environmental and social safeguard performance review of the MDTF-N portfolio is to assess the procedures and resources applied to ensure effective application of the World Bank safeguard policies, in the preparation and implementation of the MDTF-NS portfolio. National legislation and the institutional framework for environmental and social risk management will also be reviewed to better understand its implications for effective implementation of the Bank's safeguards polices. Section two of the report describes the use of safeguards in project preparation, the assignment of environmental categories, the consideration of alternatives, consultation with stakeholders, budget provisions for safeguard implementation, consideration of client capacity, grievance procedures and public disclosure. Section three covers the implementation of safeguard policies, including monitoring, supervision missions, actual grievances, follow-up by the client, results of the latest Country Portfolio Performance Review (CPPR) regarding safeguards and, finally, considerations of long vs. short-term planning for sustainability. Section four contains conclusions and recommendations for action.


  • Autor

    Gross,Daniel R., Kardash, Abdelmoneim

  • Data do documento


  • TIpo de documento

    Documento de Trabalho

  • No. do relatório


  • Nº do volume


  • Total Volume(s)


  • País


  • Região


  • Data de divulgação


  • Disclosure Status


  • Nome do documento

    Sudan national multi donor trust fund portfolio : environmental and social safeguards performance review

  • Palavras-chave

    Compensation and Relocation Committee;economic and sector work;client needs;environmental and social management;Environmental and Social Impact;Environmental and Social Safeguard;access to basic service;participation of local community;participation of civil society;early stages of implementation;Micro and Small Enterprises;project design and implementation;social and environmental;consultations with stakeholders;animal waste management;Full Environmental Assessment;potential for harm;health and environment;number of water;medical waste disposal;lack of facilities;adequate financial provision;road and bridges;damage to health;national environmental legislation;recommendations for action;financial management specialist;provision of water;improve livestock;social risk management;provision water;water supply connection;bank supervision missions;rural development benefit;rehabilitation of water;construction of highway;hand washing facility;downstream water bodies;lack of water;adverse environmental impact;lack of time;response to crisis;analysis of alternatives;Internally Displaced People;Environmental Management Plan;underground storage tank;Safeguard Policies;safeguard policy;mitigation measure;grievance procedure;safeguard specialist;social issue;environmental specialist;extensive consultation;social sustainability;emergency operation;health post;environmental issue;environmental agency;safeguard action;financial intermediaries;safeguard issue;grant funds;land acquisition;rangeland degradation;involuntary resettlement;environmental risk;institutional framework;Livestock Production;construction camp;rangeland management;Conflict Resolution;field visits;disclosure policy;environmental perspective;water source;assessment tool;safeguards requirement;blunt instrument;environmental goal;international donor;water tank;mosquito net;dump site;baseline data;affected communities;environmental regulation;environmental problem;investment program;inadequate safeguards;latrine facility;environmental damage;livestock market;classroom setting;sectoral ministries;satellite communication;oversight function;legal code;long-term sustainability;stocking rate;livestock facility;pastoral group;safeguard measure;electrical installation;national policy;budgetary constraint;environmental staff;community involvement;health club;Resettled Population;water pump;program budget;private activity;budget provision;Civil War;strategic objective;guiding principles;school building;simplified procedures;Safeguards Unit;technical feasibility;alternative routing;construction work;regular operations;national investment;local infrastructure;social analysis;special safeguard;Population Displacement;Bank Fund;train activity;government involvement;financing agreement;procurement rule;effective application;matching fund;aide memoire;health problem;internal conflict;important change;political feasibility;food insecurity;management committee;bank assistance;federal level;informal training;surgical gloves;grievance mechanism;health program;security situation;local investment;Donor countries;long-term planning;environmental degradation;school facility;interethnic conflicts;current investment;loan capital;systems development;loan proceeds;good governance;entrepreneurial spirit;appeal procedure;review audit;highway segment;managing animal;



Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)

  • PDF oficial
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.