Skip to Main Navigation

Brazil - Federal District Multisector Public Management Project (Inglês)

Ratings for the Federal District Multisector Public Management Project for Brazil were as follows: outcomes were unsatisfactory; risk to development outcome was moderate; Bank performance was moderately unsatisfactory; and borrower performance was also highly unsatisfactory. Some lessons learned includes: strong government and implementing entity ownership and capacity are critical for effective design and implementation. Project design needs to introduce safeguards to protect the project in case of a change in political situation, particularly when taking risks with a new instrument and new counterparts. Assessing changes in management practices has to go beyond the signing and evaluation of Result Agreements (RAs). Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) should be part of fiduciary review package, particularly if disbursing against results. This will include preparing a solid log frame; developing measurable indicators; and establishing viable M&E arrangements. Bank fiduciary rules and reporting systems remained a challenge even though the project design intended to introduce more flexible arrangements. Consistent recording of project events and issues is necessary for management to be able to make informed decisions regarding projects.


  • Data do documento


  • TIpo de documento

    Conclusão da Implementação e Relatórios sobre Resultados

  • No. do relatório


  • Nº do volume


  • Total Volume(s)


  • País


  • Região

    América Latina e Caribe,

  • Data de divulgação


  • Disclosure Status


  • Nome do documento

    Brazil - Federal District Multisector Public Management Project

  • Palavras-chave

    Global Indicator;Master Plan for Urban;access to basic health care;education and health;level of health care;ip disbursements archived;public sector management reform;primary school completion rate;access to decision makers;federal district;quality of public service;adjustment need;efficiency of public spending;monitoring and evaluation capacity;population and reproductive health;economic and financial analysis;quality and efficiency;public transport service;quality of education;public transport sector;procurement process;age-grade distortion;low-income area;financial management arrangement;financial management procedure;general education sector;transport control;assessment of management;financial management capability;exchange rate;degree of commitment;public transport mode;public transportation mode;local government system;Exchange Rates;sense of ownership;early child development;achievement of targets;efficiency and quality;global financial crisis;allegations of corruption;central urban area;public sector service;outputs by components;control of information;lack of evidence;poor urban area;indicator value;basic education activity;Early Childhood Development;federal funding;Linked to Disbursement;pap smear;bus service;performance incentive;retroactive financing;bus company;internal control;output measures;program finance;loan financing;intermediate outcome;procurement capacity;good governance;federal program;transactions cost;infant death;public education;operational capacity;outcome indicator;fiduciary risk;increased access;public expenditure;Prenatal Care;



Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)

  • PDF oficial
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.