Skip to Main Navigation

Benin - Borgou Region Pilot Rural Support Project (Inglês)

This report rates project outcome as satisfactory rather than highly satisfactory. given the importance that the LIL places on increasing communiy capacity, it is imperative that project performance indicators are able to track changes in capacity. Moreover, the project had a limited impact on improving the participation of women in managing their socio-economic environment--a major project objective. Also, limited success was achieved in adopting new agricultural production technologies. The PPAR rates sustainability as likely and Borrower performance as highly satisfactory. However, the PPAR rates institutional development impact as substantial rather than high, as some crucial institutional issues received less attention than warranted. The PPAR rates overall Bank performance as only satisfactory: First the Bank did not give attention to coordination of rules and processes between different Bank projects that support similar activities in the Borgou region, often in the same communities. Second, with the move to budget support, the Bank did not effectively (and in a timely manner) communicate to the Borrower as to how it would continue to support a follow on to the Borgou Pilot. The Operation Evaluations Department found that these factors conveyed negative, confusing, and demoralizing messages to the Borrower and the communities. The experience of this project offers several important lessons for future Bank supported community-driven development interventions in Benin and elsewhere: 1) The LIL instrument is designed to support learning and innovation. From the Borrower's perspective, implied in the use of a LIL is future Bank support for expansion of a successful experiment. However, when the Bank shifts towards favoring a different lending approach for the country, without communicating clearly and in a timely manner to the Borrower as to what this means for follow-on support, the credibility of the LIL instrument is eroded. 2) The design of CDD projects needs to be realistic about the costs and time required to satisfactorily implement such operations. 3) In a CDD intervention the performance indicators need to be designed to monitor and track quantitative and qualitative progress on achievement of objectives. Though the quality of community participation in decisionmaking is dificult to measure, if no attempt is made to do so, it is likely to receive less attention as project teams become preoccupied with meeting progress on quantitative targets. 4) The Bank needs to harmonize the rules and processes in its community-based interventions in a given country and coordinate with donors supporting similar interventions in that country.

Detalhes

  • Data do documento

    2003/06/11

  • TIpo de documento

    Relatório sobre Avaliação do Desempenho do Projeto

  • No. do relatório

    26087

  • Nº do volume

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • País

    Benin,

  • Região

    África,

  • Data de divulgação

    2010/07/01

  • Nome do documento

    Benin - Borgou Region Pilot Rural Support Project

  • Palavras-chave

    empowerment of the poor;water supply and sanitation;Learning and Innovation Credit;learning and innovation loan;Operational Core Curriculum;project performance indicator;participation of woman;local government institution;capacity of villages;village development plan;Natural Resource Management;process of decentralization;fight against poverty;community based intervention;Local Development Component;community decision making;control over resources;transfer of responsibility;Decentralization and Community;increase in capacity;long-term sustainable development;access to school;capacity of community;capacity building component;land use right;cooperation and assistance;capacity building support;income generating activity;kind of investment;quality at entry;quality of preparation;program for agricultural;institutional development impact;peer review process;law and regulation;per capita income;natural resource base;village level infrastructure;capacity of woman;quality of infrastructure;community capacity building;productive investment;village communities;participatory approach;community contribution;rural community;community participation;community level;social infrastructure;social capital;rural woman;future bank;agricultural production;local conflict;increased access;resource mobilization;simple procedure;assessment mission;local radio;participatory development;quantitative targets;donor support;poor village;cultural factor;government structure;local planning;decentralization effort;community empowerment;participating community;managerial capacity;bee keeping;storage facility;national budget;follow-on support;impact indicator;quantitative input;political group;community social;long-term effect;small-scale infrastructure;poor community;political implication;written agreement;Education Services;climatic condition;assessment finding;non-governmental organization;donor interest;local election;performance rating;societal norms;poverty alleviation;contribution requirement;marginalized communities;field staff;migratory pattern;water table;seasonal grazing;water availability;literacy program;marketing cost;community involvement;market gardening;budgetary procedure;budget support;monitoring indicator;budgetary limitation;budgetary resource;adequate resources;marketing support;balanced development;long-term sustainability;decentralization framework;Borrowing Countries;decentralized government;budgetary support;social stratification;multiple donor;social factor;private agency;financial resource;government's vision;local capacity;project intervention;radio broadcast;local condition;qualitative assessment;village committee;crop system;water point;public latrine;civil society;basic infrastructure;rural village;participatory management;project costing;government contribution;matching grant;Investment Support;vegetable crop;government service;private provider;procurement responsibility;urban development;evaluation method;Natural Resources;borrower performance;analytical approach;evaluation study;project ratings;operational staff;special interest;administrative support;sectoral approach;poor road;market infrastructure;commercial crop;land area;tree nurseries;Rural Sector;national assembly;credit effectiveness;adjustment need;procurement procedure;counterpart fund;political decentralization;adjustment operation;sustainable use;unintended effect;transition arrangement;Research Support;adequate maintenance;writing skill;literacy level;field visits;poor villagers;opportunity cost;socioeconomic impact;basic skill;assessment rate;community procurement;local ngo;community drive;government commitment;

Downloads

COMPLETAR RELATÓRIO

Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)

  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.