Skip to Main Navigation

Randomized impact evaluation of Afghanistan's national solidarity program : executive summary of the final report (Dari)

The National Solidarity Program (NSP) is the largest development program in Afghanistan. Since its inauguration in 2003, NSP has established 32,000 community development councils (CDCs) across 361 districts in all of Afghanistan's 34 provinces and has financed nearly 65,000 development projects. NSP seeks to improve the access of rural villagers to basic services and to create a foundation of village governance based on democratic processes and female participation. The NSP impact evaluation (IE) is a multi-year randomized control trial designed to measure the effects of implementation of the second phase of NSP on a broad range of economic, political, and social indicators. The sample for study consists of 500 villages selected jointly with NSP and implementing partners in mid-2007. The study tests a series of hypotheses which examine the impacts at midline and end line of NSP on the access of villagers to utilities, services and infrastructure; on the economic welfare of villagers; on local governance; on political attitudes and state-building; and on social norms. NSP funded utilities projects deliver substantial increases in access to drinking water and electricity, but infrastructure projects are less effective. As a consequence, NSP has limited impacts on long-term economic outcomes such as consumption or asset ownership. This brief gives introduction; describes methodology and data sources; and lastly gives conclusion.


  • Autor

    Beath, Andrew Christia, Fotini Enikolopov, Ruben

  • Data do documento


  • TIpo de documento


  • No. do relatório


  • Nº do volume


  • Total Volume(s)


  • País


  • Região

    Sul da Ásia,

  • Data de divulgação


  • Disclosure Status


  • Nome do documento

    Randomized impact evaluation of Afghanistan's national solidarity program : executive summary of the final report

  • Palavras-chave

    access to clean drinking water;female participation;access to medical service;access to drinking water;proportion of male;participation of woman;service and infrastructure;statistical significance;proportion of woman;quality of learning;Access to Education;food aid distribution;proportion of female;central government official;positive impact;block grant;school attendance;program impact;Public Goods;counseling service;democratic process;political activities;customary authorities;treatment group;political attitude;economic welfare;government legitimacy;food insecurity;market outcome;public life;social impact;representative body;beneficial impact;baseline survey;agricultural yield;observed change;social cohesion;agricultural sale;female socialization;aid allocation;dispute mediation;cultural constraints;village council;sales revenue;electoral participation;computational skill;increased access;governance quality;qualitative study;quantitative assessment;implementing partner;household interview;focus group;institutional responsibilities;meeting attendance;health outcome;long-term impact;accountability structure;clear delineation;parliamentary election;democratic election;consumption level;local transportation;project impact;household income;water quality;Water Shortage;benefit distribution;electricity usage;caloric intake;medical professional;social indicator;rural villagers;universal suffrage;public resource;government entity;centralized state;delivering services;local security;institutional accountability;



Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)

  • PDF oficial
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.