Skip to Main Navigation

Gambia, The - Third Education Project : resettlement policy framework (Inglês)

The objective of the Third Education Project for Gambia is to provide a legal framework and a screening process for future education investment activities. Negative measures include: loss of land, loss of housing or commercial business, loss of economic resources or employment, marginalization of the population concerned, a degration of health standards or increased morbidity, loss of access to natural resources, disarticulation or disturbance of way of life of affected population, and food shortages. Mitigation measures include: a) reallocate land equivalent if not better than their land re-possessed; b) intensification of the methods of production and diversification of their produce or revenue generating activities outside their lands; c) use of the resources created by the project to improve productivity; and d) the creation of ad-hoc committees responsible for problems of resettlement or losses of assets or access is recommended.

Detalhes

  • Data do documento

    2006/03/01

  • TIpo de documento

    Plano de reassentamento

  • No. do relatório

    RP814

  • Nº do volume

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • País

    Gâmbia,

  • Região

    África,

  • Data de divulgação

    2009/02/02

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Nome do documento

    Gambia, The - Third Education Project : resettlement policy framework

  • Palavras-chave

    land acquisition;Environmental and Social Management Framework;procedure for payment;Environmental and Social Impact Assessment;Land Acquisition and Resettlement;Technical and Vocational Education;efficient delivery of education;gender equity in education;market value of land;legal framework for resettlement;loss of asset;loss of land;displacement of people;relocation of persons;affected persons;source of income;source income;local government authority;standard of living;acquisition of land;basic education system;quality secondary education;future education;grievance redress mechanism;project affected persons;quality and relevance;quality tertiary education;displacement of persons;compensation for loss;access to asset;social and environmental;resettlement action plan;land tenure system;customary land tenure;resettlement of people;Access to Education;opportunities for human;access to land;method of production;impact of land;rehabilitation of infrastructure;possession of land;valuation of asset;Country Assistance Strategies;country assistance strategy;national policy framework;high quality education;perennial crop;loss of property;lieu of wages;payment of compensation;improved land management;loss of water;Resettlement Policy Framework;compensation for land;severity of impact;resettlement and rehabilitation;payment in kind;sale of land;source of revenue;transfer of land;loss of revenue;replacement of asset;central government authority;loss of livelihood;income earning capacity;payment for compensation;loss of income;national environmental agency;displaced person;land use;replacement cost;rural community;traditional authority;Natural Resources;social network;involuntary resettlement;social consideration;mutual help;civil works;increased morbidity;agricultural land;monitoring plan;production system;social amenities;cultural identities;Host Communities;resettlement plan;community systems;community level;organizational arrangement;property right;disadvantaged persons;land holding;productive asset;grievance mechanism;production level;eligibility criterion;income source;fiscal authority;good faith;title holders;legal instrument;public consultation;land title;consultation process;compensation payment;valuing asset;gender parity;Higher Education;living standard;Land Ownership;tertiary institution;increased access;emotional stress;Population Displacement;religious belief;cultural norm;agricultural asset;agricultural income;field investigation;legal procedure;legal process;monitoring arrangement;private domain;land speculation;Proposed Investment;compensation measures;community institution;community value;declared value;Safeguard Policies;cultural reasons;disabled people;farm family;administrative authority;domestic farming;safeguard policy;continuous basis;vulnerable people;reproductive services;subsistence farming;cultural rules;customary norms;individual person;community land;vulnerable individual;land transfer;legal institution;residential purpose;transparent manner;gold deposit;land conflicts;rural councils;forest code;urban sector;corporate person;annex annex;adequate sanitation;living condition;field survey;affected communities;Fixed Assets;voluntary contribution;grazing land;movable asset;health standards;affected population;food shortage;productive capacity;building material;rental fee;cottage industry;small ruminant;Fish Farming;school location;disposal site;liquid waste;disposal system;customary right;rehabilitation assistance;land preparation;credit facilities;job opportunities;job opportunity;transaction cost;market rate;commercial rates;health facility;productive potential;poverty alleviation;transfer tax;guiding principles;valuation procedure;land resources;indigenous group;Ethnic Minorities;Public Services;site owner;secure tenure;replacement land;housing program;market compensation;vulnerable group;market cost;compensation agreement;groundwater resource;budgetary implication;funding mechanism;drainage system

Downloads

COMPLETAR RELATÓRIO

Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)

  • PDF oficial
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.