Skip to Main Navigation

Poland - Forest Biodiversity Protection Project (Inglês)

Overall, project outcome is satisfactory, sustainability is likely, and the institutional development impact is substantial. Although the Implementation Completion Report re-emphasized the need for greater inclusiveness in project preparation and implementation, these are lessons largely incorporated in subsequent operations. The lessons this audit specifies, relate to longer-term funding for conservation of high-value biological resources, and the Global Environmental Facility's (GEF) approach to the protection of genetic material. First, the GEF should review whether steps are not required to ensure long-term support for efforts to protect resources of high global biological value, since in practice, the assurance that donors would follow the GEF lead, did not materialize, even though the validity for GEF support remained. Although the GEF is taking a more proactive role in program formulation, a generalized review on the issue may be appropriate. Second, the approach by GEF to the protection of generic material, and the role of gene banks, should be reviewed, since substantial investments were made in the gene bank, but they are primarily being used in support of the overall program of the State Forest Administration. Considerable expertise has been developed by the staff of the Kostrzyca gene bank, thus GEF may want to consider optimum uses in its bio-diversity protection program.

Detalhes

  • Data do documento

    2000/06/20

  • TIpo de documento

    Relatório sobre Avaliação do Desempenho do Projeto

  • No. do relatório

    20589

  • Nº do volume

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • País

    Polônia,

  • Região

    Europa e Ásia Central,

  • Data de divulgação

    2017/11/20

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Nome do documento

    Poland - Forest Biodiversity Protection Project

  • Palavras-chave

    gene bank;monitoring and evaluation mechanism;effect of pollution;short time horizon;source of funding;institutional development impact;assessment of performance;international development agency;state forest administration;forest biological diversity;protection of biodiversity;choice of site;geographic information system;management of forest;global environmental benefits;degree of sophistication;preservation of biodiversity;international good practice;water pollution monitoring;biological resource;air pollution monitoring;state of knowledge;biological value;Forest Management;genetic material;borrower performance;Natural Resources;cross-border collaboration;public outreach;buffer zone;global benefit;long-term funding;industrial area;park area;forest plant;restoration activities;ecological issues;incremental cost;principal component;external funding;audit rate;timber production;operational issues;international cooperation;participatory planning;operational procedure;project costing;forest association;institutional framework;global biodiversity;landscape level;primary reason;mitigation activity;forestry policy;sustainable use;socio-economic development;fundamental problem;local income;policy shift;wild boar;commercial forest;public awareness;forestry law;external agencies;forestry sector;natural forest;natural environment;bid price;international environmental;lowland forest;international community;external support;Research Support;manufacturing industry;external assistance;indigenous species;high altitude;pollution damage;restoration program;land-use zoning;border area;forest degradation;acid rain;population center;research fund;environmental area;external source;wildlife reserve;environmental group;limited flexibility;environment protection;forestry institution;private collaboration;ancient tree;ecosystem health;plant material;administrative support;plant species;improved communication;trade contract;carbon emission;Economic Policy;land management;localized restoration;commercial rates;field activity;heavy industry;scientific effort;social analysis;implementing partner;land drop;field operations;bilateral sources;research funding;financial specialist;social standpoint;ecosystem restoration;forest material;forest ecosystem;ecosystem level;performance rating;research institution;fund raising;restoration efforts;biodiversity resource;conservation approach;biological richness;future research;public dissemination;research institutions;conservation measure;conservation planning;plant research;adjacent areas;

Downloads

COMPLETAR RELATÓRIO

Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)

  • PDF oficial
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.