Skip to Main Navigation

Revised Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP) Securing Uganda’s Natural Resource Base in Protected Areas (P174337) (Inglês)


  • Autor

    Borrowing Agency

  • Data do documento


  • TIpo de documento

    Stakeholder Engagement Plan

  • Nº do volume


  • País


  • Região


  • Data de divulgação


  • Disclosure Status


  • Nome do documento

    Revised Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP) Securing Uganda’s Natural Resource Base in Protected Areas (P174337)

  • Palavras-chave

    Environmental and Social Review Summary; Environmental and Social Safeguard; project design and implementation; Gender-Based Violence; community health and safety; implementation of mitigation plans; protected area; participatory forest management; vulnerable social group; stakeholder engagement; environmental conservation; settlement of dispute; water and environment; third-party service provider; grievance redress mechanism; capacity building need; stakeholder analysis matrix; violence against child; effective forest management; loss of land; management of forest; Climate-Smart Development; national policy framework; Natural Resource Management; resolution of grievances; access to infrastructure; natural resource base; defects liability period; operations and maintenance; social and environmental; good business practice; focus group meeting; public address system; relationship with communities; access to land; How to File; consultations with stakeholders; informed decision making; person with disability; secondary level; use of wetland; water resource planning; place of work; community social group; high population growth; annual loss rate; public meeting; consultation process; public hearing; public consultation; grievance management; community level; mitigation measure; human rights; stakeholder consultation; feedback mechanism; vulnerable group; special interest; child labor; stakeholder identification; vulnerable individual; information dissemination; minority group; community conservation; social issue; field staff; Cultural Heritage; soil erosion; wildlife area; Host Communities; conservation group; forest fire; business skill; grievance mechanism; Natural Resources; community wildlife; marginalized group; working condition; opinion leaders; Land tenure; safety plan; stakeholder participation; land area; gender identity; cultural practice; mutual respect; legal requirement; medical provider; disadvantaged individuals; disclosure program; consultation meeting; remote area; effective approach; cultural site; social justice; Environmental Resources; local content; Public Services; government planning; community network; land right; social identity; property owner; Social Protection; Conflict Resolution; livelihood support; high power; low power; primary level; stakeholder mobilization; sexual orientation; development partner; natural forest; physical barrier; open bank; reference source; advocacy support; natural areas; game parks; traditional leaders; Equal Opportunity; manual procedure; community facilitator; community consultation; management structure; dust emission; adequate water; child abuse; Work Injury; occupational hazard; affected persons; implementing partner; geographical area; legal action; working day; management procedure; forest committee; grievance handling; court system; conservation rangers; aggrieved person; regular meetings; conflicting party; legal process; district leadership; participatory planning; corrective action; local council; community response; online consultations; protocol parameter; online platform; print media; baseline information; personal relationship; sensitive issues; risk analysis; physical distance; study including; community engagement; land acquisition; social impact; collected information; stakeholder meetings; fact sheet; answer sheet; social performance; construction phase; vulnerable people; project plan; field visits; continuous consultation; telephone call; community representative; livelihood group; affected communities; practical skill; project effectiveness; resolution mechanism; public engagement; grant financing; economic hardship; several factors; household income; market dynamic; agricultural land; craft design; land take; nutritional requirement; environmental issue; forest fragmentation; know how; agricultural expansion; forest product; discriminatory impact; appropriate authority; no resolution; private land; Ethnic Minorities; wood extraction; forest reserve



Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)

  • PDF oficial
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.