Skip to Main Navigation

Albania : Lake Skadar-Shkoder Integrated Ecosystem Management Project : resettlement action plan (Vol. 2) : Process framework for the Montenegro side of the Lake (Inglês)

The Albania-Montenegro Lake Skadar/Shkodra Integrated Ecosystems Management Project (LSIEMP) aims to support and extend existing mechanisms for effective transbundary cooperation, at the local, regional, and national levels, for the preservation, management, and sustainable economic development of the Skadar Lake region. The process framework document includes a number of recommendation and mitigation measures, as follows : project affected peoples (PAPs) will be given a chance to voice their concerns and preferences regarding project impacts and possible mitigation actions throughout the design, preparation and implementation; reduce unregulated fishing, as much as possible by giving unlicensed fishermen the chance to either legitimize their practices or transition into other livelihood activities; the project will attempt to facilitate the strengthening and/or enforcement of laws and regulations pertaining to the natural resource use in and around the Lake using a combination of incentives and that will be determined during project implementation with inputs from the appropriate resource user umbrella organizations; regulate fishing trade by creating fish markets in Shkoder where only licensed fishermen can sell their catches, while also funding the application of stronger, fairer controls, such as by training and motivating rangers to enforce restrictions on illegal fishing methods across the Lake; encourage investments in the processing and marketing of goods and services; promote investment activities that are already pursued in the area (e.g. handicrafts production, the production of certain medicinal plants, family-based aquaculture in localized fish ponds, etc.) or be essentially new (e.g. agro-industrial business development using updated technologies); establish conflict resolution mechanisms for mediating and resolving conflicts within or between affected communities should it be necessary; and finally, should any conflicts arise that are cross-border in nature, they will be referred to an ad-hoc body created within the framework of an appropriate transboundary institution, such as the bilateral Working Group on Public Outreach and Education established under the LSIEMP.

Detalhes

  • Data do documento

    2007/02/08

  • TIpo de documento

    Plano de reassentamento

  • No. do relatório

    RP592

  • Nº do volume

    2

  • Total Volume(s)

    2

  • País

    South Eastern Europe and Balkans,

  • Região

    Europa e Ásia Central,

  • Data de divulgação

    2007/08/16

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Nome do documento

    Process framework for the Montenegro side of the Lake

  • Palavras-chave

    environmental assessment and management;fishery management plan;public access to information;broad range of stakeholders;sustainable village economy;natural resource use;participatory data collection;enforcement of law;environmental management framework;adverse environmental consequence;Regional Economic Development;standard of living;sustainable tourism development;international good practice;Sustainable Economic Development;determination of eligibility;demand for fish;conflict resolution mechanism;bird nesting sites;affected persons;protected area;Natural Resources;fish resource;local livelihoods;artisanal fishermen;fishing restrictions;alternative livelihood;environmental sustainability;sustainable management;fish stock;fish trade;artisanal fishing;restoration measure;local market;productivity level;livelihood opportunity;socioeconomic conditions;local population;commercial practice;household use;socio-economic indicator;human capital;community access;commercial fishing;local stakeholder;sport fishing;social sustainability;eligibility criterion;household survey;fishing regime;community level;subjective indicators;productive activity;employment alternative;employment type;ecosystem health;data management;targeted training;organizational capacity;monitoring arrangement;produce food;adequate representation;standard indicator;social analysis;social group;spatial planning;species composition;legislative framework;public consultation;public oversight;pollution control;project sponsor;grievance procedure;electric shocks;assessment design;environmental law;livelihood strategy;commercial interests;Urban Planning;tour operator;income support;involuntary resettlement;regulatory regime;fishing practice;socioeconomic survey;migratory species;fishing activity;unsustainable fishing;direct participation;applied studies;integrated management;critical ecosystem;resource users;public engagement;participatory monitoring;legal limit;economic exploitation;habitat restoration;legal structure;freshwater fish;potential conflicts;participatory approach;natural endowment;political dialogue;participation requirement;hard copy;project impact;mitigation actions;consultation process;public hearing;illegal fishing;income restoration;effective participation;unregulated fishing;research program;pilot activities;private entity;municipal offices;national legislation;local fishermen;affected communities;

Downloads

COMPLETAR RELATÓRIO

Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)

  • PDF oficial
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.