Skip to Main Navigation

Final synthesis report - a comparative analysis of decentralisation in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda (Inglês)

This report provides a synthesis and comparative analysis of the main findings from the case studies of decentralization in Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania. The detailed findings are available from the country studies, whereas this synthesis report draws out the main findings and lessons learned and compare the experiences across the three countries. In recent years most of the Sub-Saharan African countries have undertaken comprehensive reforms of their public administrative systems, with decentralization as one of the major tools to improve efficiency in public service delivery and to strengthen the involvement of citizens in the local decision-making processes3. Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania are amongst the countries that, for different historical, political and economic reasons, have embarked on the decentralization reform process. This regional study of the experiences of decentralization addresses the need to foster cross-national learning of best practices, identifies gaps and challenges, provides valuable inputs to a more informed future strategy on donor support and, hopefully, generates ideas for each involved country on the ways and means to strengthen the process.

Detalhes

  • Autor

    Steffensen, Jesper ; Tidemand, Per ; Naitore, Harriet ; Ssewankambo, Emmanual ; Mwaipopo, Eke

  • Data do documento

    2004/08/01

  • TIpo de documento

    Documento de Trabalho

  • No. do relatório

    46312

  • Nº do volume

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • País

    África,

  • Região

    África,

  • Data de divulgação

    2010/07/01

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Nome do documento

    Final synthesis report - a comparative analysis of decentralisation in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda

  • Palavras-chave

    medium term plan;infrastructure and services;Information, Education and Communication;efficiency in resource allocation;transfer power;primary health care;assignment of responsibility;comparative analysis;local government system;central government institution;human resource capacity;devolution of power;central government control;public sector reform;service delivery standard;point of departure;roads and water;local decisionmaking process;law and regulation;fiscal transfer system;public sector employment;local accountability mechanisms;transfer of fund;budget approval process;efficient service provision;assignment of expenditure;assignment of revenue;service and infrastructure;access to fund;career development prospect;public service delivery;economies of scale;transfer of responsibility;local government relation;provision of service;local government authority;community base;Governance and Accountability;adequate human resources;devolution of authority;assignment of function;Civil Service Reform;political structure;devolved system;reform effort;legal framework;reform process;legal reform;Regional Studies;quantitative data;statutory bodies;colonial period;water board;donor support;civil society;municipal road;historical development;radical reform;institutional framework;urban water;institutional incentive;revenue assignment;fiscal framework;government units;financial resource;fiscal autonomy;local democracy;government power;electoral process;intergovernmental finance;public resource;field visits;body corporate;educational service;poverty alleviation;road district;district hospital;uniform standard;autonomous body;accountability structure;colonial administration;legislative power;grant allocation;administrative problem;local council;personnel management;improving competitiveness;political leadership;state policy;reform policy;grant system;efficiency gain;transfer scheme;enhancing participation;political will;transfer function;political representation;financial system;political context;strategic approach;good governance;innovative way;qualitative study;constitutional history;local population;performance incentive;Wage Bill;donor coordination;contextual factor;city council;dutch fund;european commission;decentralization process;public reform;political support;historical perspective;district education;Concept papers;fiscal aspects;legal review;governance reform;donor agencies;administrative capacity;management problems;long-term strategy;development partner;gradual process;tax revenue;budget increase;life expectancy;political agenda;direct funding;comparative assessment;restructuring process;common problems;field work;local management;Infant Mortality;job security;federal system;nation building;guerrilla war;

Downloads

COMPLETAR RELATÓRIO

Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)

  • PDF oficial
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.