Skip to Main Navigation

Third overall performance study on the Global Environmental Facility OPS3 : progressing toward environmental results : Executive summary (Chinês)

The purpose of the Third Overall Performance Study (OPS3), commissioned by the Global Environment Facility (GEF) Council, is "to assess the extent to which GEF has achieved, or is on its way towards achieving its main objectives, as laid down in the GEF Instrument and subsequent decisions by the GEF Council and the Assembly, including key documents such as the Operational Strategy and the Policy Recommendations agreed as part of the Third Replenishment of the GEF Trust Fund." (GEF/C.23/4) The OPS3 team recognizes that this study is taking place at a critical time and will provide input that is relevant to the Fourth Replenishment of the GEF Trust Fund, which will be taking place shortly after the publication of the OPS3 study. A primary goal of OPS3 is to provide relevant, timely, and actionable recommendations for each of the Terms of Reference (TOR) areas to support the replenishment process and associated programming. The scope of OPS3 is defined by the "Terms of Reference for the Third Overall Performance Study approved by the GEF Council on May 21, 2004, and it covers five main themes : 1) Results of GEF activities. 2) Sustainability of results at the country level. 3) GEF as a catalytic institution. 4) GEF policies, institutional structure, and partnerships. 5) GEF implementation processes.

Detalhes

  • Autor

    Wagner,Mark Chandler

  • Data do documento

    2005/06/01

  • TIpo de documento

    Publicação

  • No. do relatório

    36404

  • Nº do volume

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    2

  • País

    Mundo,

  • Região

    Regiões Mundiais,

  • Data de divulgação

    2010/07/01

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Nome do documento

    Executive summary

  • Palavras-chave

    multilateral fund;convention on biological diversity;Junior Professional Associate;Monitoring and Evaluation Unit;access to safe water;Science and Technology;small island developing states;global environmental benefits;state of knowledge;global environmental problem;community of practice;land and water;area biodiversity;market for energy;data collection system;climate change portfolio;Operational Data Store;global environmental issue;lack of transparency;special trust fund;adaptation benefit;methyl bromide phaseout;economies in transition;global environmental agreements;national environmental priority;field visits;recipient countries;catalytic effect;strategic focus;portfolio level;global benefit;academic community;combat desertification;data system;protected area;strategic guidance;land degradation;data gathering;comparative advantage;environmental result;tender process;consultative process;project pipeline;national resource;adequate resources;fund activity;scientific capacity;semi-autonomous entities;agricultural aspect;corporate entity;communications channel;institutional form;central coordination;fee system;dynamic nature;short-term goal;broad stakeholder;limited capacity;financial resource;participatory approach;anecdotal evidence;evaluation system;funds disbursement;successful innovation;strategic action;Programmatic Approach;negative effect;country portfolio;non-governmental organization;water bodies;coherent strategy;organizational change;government representative;operational principle;learning curve;operational issues;macro level;environmental baselines;market development;project approval;sustainable use;benefit sharing;genetic resource;strategic objective;lake victoria;regional conventions;market transformation;world community;achievement need;plant species;waste treatment;incremental cost;strategic partnerships;sustainable way;civil society;field study;simple procedure;land area;global goal;carbon finance;biodiversity loss;global trend;literature review;environmental performance;project size;research community;national strategic;forest business;geographic balance;broad consensus;technical back stopping;field work;extra time;written comment;stakeholder consultation;regional priority;contract negotiation;international partners;generally well;baseline data;evaluation process;global effort;extensive consultation;active participation;informal exchange;applicable law;financial mechanism;International Public;evaluation procedure;

Downloads

COMPLETAR RELATÓRIO

Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)

  • PDF oficial
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.