Skip to Main Navigation

India - Sustainable Urban Transport Project (Inglês)

Ratings for the Energy Efficiency Project for Romania are as follows: outcomes of the project were satisfactory, risk to global environment outcomes was moderate, bank performance was satisfactory, and borrower performance was satisfactory. Some lessons learned included: based on the experience gained from this project as well as from the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), Global Environment Facility (GEF) project, and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) project, the project level transaction costs are still high and clients require considerable pre-investment Technical Assistance (TA) support (feasibility studies, structuring finance and finding attractive financing, etc.) before large scale Energy Efficiency (EE) implementation is possible. Local knowledge and skills contribute to success more cost effectively. A strong and reliable pipeline of initial projects is essential to ensure early success of this type of project. The original fund manager contract structure should have been weighted more towards performance instead of retainer part, adding flexibility in the contract structure to adjust the fixed and performance fee will be desirable and avoids costly repeat procurement, knowledge of local industry and market is very important to ensure success. For small demonstration projects such as this one, the institutional design of Romanian Energy Efficiency Fund (FREE) was overly complex, but at the same time, the fiduciary controls and checks and balances are attractive features for scaling up with both public and private capital.


  • Data do documento


  • TIpo de documento

    Folhas de Dados Integradas sobre Salvaguardas

  • No. do relatório


  • Nº do volume


  • Total Volume(s)


  • País


  • Região

    Sul da Ásia,

  • Data de divulgação


  • Disclosure Status


  • Nome do documento

    India - Sustainable Urban Transport Project

  • Palavras-chave

    Environmental and Social Management Framework;legal right of way;Resettlement action plans;solid waste management facility;urban transport system;sustainable urban transport;local air pollutant;safeguard policy;Safeguard Policies;general transportation sector;safety of dam;public transport development;removal of trees;environmentally sustainable transport;local air pollution;environmentally friendly transport;response to crisis;urban transport reform;green house gas;city development plan;cultural property;project intervention;private land;mitigation measure;electric transmission;involuntary resettlement;bicycle use;special interest;noise level;public domain;stakeholder meetings;city official;municipal governance;institution building;traffic police;project costing;institutional responsibilities;local ngo;resettlement plan;investment loan;public place;physical characteristic;irreversible impacts;safeguard issue;national research;transport planning;income source;building elements;adversely impact;commercial purpose;safeguard analysis;Public Infrastructure;land use;green field;international waterway;indigenous people;Indigenous Peoples;natural habitat;civil works;Activities Page;lessons learnt;road component;adequate budgetary;environmental health;separately funds;positive impact;local heritage;



Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)

  • PDF oficial
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.