Skip to Main Navigation

Niger - Adaptive Social Safety Nets Project : additional financing (Inglês)

The development objective of the Adaptive Social Safety Nets Project for Niger is to establish and support a safety nets system which will increase access of poor and food insecure households to cash transfer and cash for work programs. The additional financing (AF) was formulated during the midterm review of the parent project held in December 2014, in response to the government’s request for additional resources to: (a) strengthen the impact of the project on resilience; (b) cover a financing gap of United States (U.S.) 3.7 million dollars; and (c) expand the geographical scope of the project to address vulnerability in the regions of Niamey (the country’s administrative capital), as well as in the regions of Diffa and Agadez where the volatile security situation continues to contribute to poverty and vulnerability. As part of the AF, the parent project will be restructured to make the safety net system more adaptive, efficient, and responsive to strengthen the ability of poor and vulnerable households to respond to shocks and build their resilience.

Detalhes

  • Data do documento

    2016/03/17

  • TIpo de documento

    Documento do projeto

  • No. do relatório

    PAD1584

  • Nº do volume

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • País

    Níger,

  • Região

    África,

  • Data de divulgação

    2016/04/06

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Nome do documento

    Niger - Adaptive Social Safety Nets Project : additional financing

  • Palavras-chave

    Fragile, Conflict & Violence;resilience to climate-related shocks;health and other social services;public-private partnership;public private partnership;climate change and disaster risk;safety net system;Cash Transfer;disaster risk management;vulnerability to food insecurity;Nutrition and Food Security;economic and financial analysis;impact of climate change;fund expenditure;Integrated Pest Management;Environmental and Social Safeguard;Monitoring and Evaluation Unit;Cash for Work Program;agriculture, fishing, and forestry;Environment and Natural Resources;number of beneficiaries;access of poor;safety net program;response to shock;social protection system;cash transfer program;effective safety nets;categories of expenditure;disaster risk financing;food insecure household;exposure to risk;cash transfer scale;payment of cash;sanitation and flood;transfer of cash;safety net intervention;children per woman;Grievance Redress Service;food crisis response;population growth rate;access to food;extremely poor household;international food prices;capacity for implementation;source of financing;utilization of pesticide;mechanism of population;promotion of woman;Natural Resource Management;social protection program;social protection policy;Early Childhood Development;impact of disaster;beneficiary household;agricultural productivity;target indicator;results framework;outcome indicator;Consulting services;vulnerable population;improved seed;Climate Risk;political instability;climate resilience;nutritional crop;government capacity;crisis prevention;behavioral change;land degradation;geographical coverage;vulnerable household;chronically poor;condition precedent;disbursement arrangement;extreme poverty;income support;program beneficiary;savings group;emergency response;safeguards compliance;procurement arrangement;high vulnerability;geographical area;non-governmental organization;food aid;household expenditure;administrative cost;humanitarian crisis;property right;direct transfer;payment mechanism;human capital;chronic poor;foregone income;household level;government intervention;labor intensity;decentralized level;intermediate indicator;vulnerable people;management cost;productive activity;Exchange Rates;temporary resettlement;Bank Policies;agricultural input;procurement performance;procurement activities;procedure manual;internal auditor;mitigation measure;government expenditure;funds transfer;good performance;emergency need;risk assessment;alternative livelihood;emergency measure;local livelihoods;dune stabilization;nutrition outcome;annual expenditure;security situation;Land tenure;environmental screening;budget envelope;disbursement rate;administrative capital;national strategy;safeguard specialist;institutional architecture;humanitarian response;project approval;school feeding;emergency program;price formation;procurement threshold;short-term intervention;adaptive approach;employment skill;regional research;productive employment;poverty headcount;regional initiative;forestry sector;limited capacity;positive impact;community asset;knowledge activity;prior review;project's achievements;reporting requirement;household investment;extreme event;agricultural runoff;appraisal mission;aide memoire;payment agreement;accounting procedure;health practice;competitive bidding;daily wage;high fertility;transfer beneficiary;national capacity;poor health;nutritional status;project duration;farming practice;water scarcity;soil erosion;payment system;retroactive financing;financing agreement;water catchment;support cost;Electronic Payment;Environmental Assessment;support policy;irrigation agriculture;

Downloads

COMPLETAR RELATÓRIO

Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)

  • PDF oficial
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.